Next Article in Journal
Oxidative Stress-Related Genetic Variants May Modify Associations of Phthalate Exposures with Asthma
Next Article in Special Issue
Prevalence of Tobacco Smoking and Determinants of Success in Quitting Smoking among Patients with Chronic Diseases: A Cross-Sectional Study in Rural Western China
Previous Article in Journal
Neighborhood Factors and Fall-Related Injuries among Older Adults Seen by Emergency Medical Service Providers
Previous Article in Special Issue
Smoking Patterns and Smoking Cessation Willingness—A Study among Beneficiaries of Government Welfare Assistance in Poland
Article Menu
Issue 2 (February) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14(2), 164; doi:10.3390/ijerph14020164

Graphic Warning Labels and the Cost Savings from Reduced Smoking among Pregnant Women

1
Department of Economics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
2
National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge, MN 02138, USA
3
Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA
4
Institute of Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 31 October 2016 / Revised: 26 January 2017 / Accepted: 1 February 2017 / Published: 8 February 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tobacco Control and Priority Groups)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [274 KB, uploaded 10 February 2017]

Abstract

Introduction: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has estimated the economic impact of Graphic Warning Labels (GWLs). By omitting the impact on tobacco consumption by pregnant women, the FDA analysis underestimates the economic benefits that would occur from the proposed regulations. There is a strong link between the occurrence of low birth weight babies and smoking while pregnant. Low birth weight babies in turn generate much higher hospital costs than normal birth weight babies. This study aims to fill the gap by quantifying the national hospital cost savings from the reductions in prenatal smoking that will arise if GWLs are implemented in the U.S. Data and Methods: This study uses several data sources. It uses Natality Data from the National Vital Statistics System of the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) in 2013 to estimate the impact of prenatal smoking on the likelihood of having a low-birth-weight baby, controlling for socio-economic and demographic characteristics as well as medical and non-medical risk factors. Using these estimates, along with the estimates of Huang et al. (2014) regarding the effect of GWLs on smoking, we calculate the change in the number of LBW (low birth weight) babies resulting from decreased prenatal smoking due to GWLs. Using this estimated change and the estimates from Russell et al. (2007) and AHRQ (2013) on the excess hospital costs of LBW babies, we calculate cost saving that arises from reduced prenatal smoking in response of GWLs. Results and Conclusions: Our results indicated that GWLs for this population could lead to hospital cost savings of 1.2 billion to 2.0 billion dollars over a 30 year horizon. View Full-Text
Keywords: prenatal smoking; low birth weight; cost estimations; graphic warning labels prenatal smoking; low birth weight; cost estimations; graphic warning labels
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Tauras, J.A.; Peck, R.M.; Cheng, K.-W.; Chaloupka, F.J. Graphic Warning Labels and the Cost Savings from Reduced Smoking among Pregnant Women. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 164.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health EISSN 1660-4601 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top