Next Article in Journal
Who Is Vulnerable to Dengue Fever? A Community Survey of the 2014 Outbreak in Guangzhou, China
Previous Article in Journal
Mapping Environmental Inequalities Relevant for Health for Informing Urban Planning Interventions—A Case Study in the City of Dortmund, Germany
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13(7), 713; doi:10.3390/ijerph13070713

Traditional vs. Contemporary Management Control Practices for Developing Public Health Policies

Pablo de Olavide University, Carretera de Utrera Km 1, 41013 Sevilla, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Ceri J. Phillips
Received: 9 May 2016 / Revised: 2 July 2016 / Accepted: 6 July 2016 / Published: 14 July 2016
(This article belongs to the Section Health Services and Health Economics Research)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [710 KB, uploaded 14 July 2016]   |  

Abstract

Public health policies must address multiple goals and complex community health needs. Recently, management control practices have emerged to provide a broader type of information for evaluating the effectiveness of healthcare policies, and relate activities and processes to multiple strategic outcomes. This study compares the effect of traditional and contemporary management control practices on the achievement of public health policies. It is also analyzed how two different uses of such practices (enabling vs. coercive) facilitate the achievement of public health policies. Relationships are explored using data collected from managers from public health agencies and public hospitals in Spain. The findings show that contemporary management control practices are more suitable than traditional practices to achieve public health policies. Furthermore, results show that public health policies are better achieved when managers use management control practices in an enabling way rather than in a coercive way. View Full-Text
Keywords: management control practices; public health policies; enabling and coercive uses of management control management control practices; public health policies; enabling and coercive uses of management control
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Naranjo-Gil, D.; Sánchez-Expósito, M.J.; Gómez-Ruiz, L. Traditional vs. Contemporary Management Control Practices for Developing Public Health Policies. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 713.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health EISSN 1660-4601 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top