Next Article in Journal
Degradation and Mineralization of Benzohydroxamic Acid by Synthesized Mesoporous La/TiO2
Previous Article in Journal
A Method for Formulizing Disaster Evacuation Demand Curves Based on SI Model
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 13
Issue 10
10.3390/ijerph13100998
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Physical Activity Level and Sedentary Behaviors among Public School Children in Dakar (Senegal) Measured by PAQ-C and Accelerometer: Preliminary Results

by
Adama Diouf
1,*,
Mbeugué Thiam
1,
Nicole Idohou-Dossou
1,
Ousmane Diongue
1,
Ndé Mégné
1,
Khady Diallo
2,
Pape Malick Sembène
2 and
Salimata Wade
1
1
Laboratoire de Nutrition, Département de Biologie Animale, Faculté des Sciences et Techniques, Université Cheikh Anta Diop (UCAD) De Dakar, Dakar-Fann BP 5005, Senegal
2
Division du Contrôle Médical Scolaire, Ministère de l’Education Nationale, Camp Jeremy Avenue Cheikh Anta Diop De Dakar, Dakar BP 35453, Senegal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13(10), 998; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13100998
Submission received: 10 June 2016 / Revised: 7 September 2016 / Accepted: 20 September 2016 / Published: 10 October 2016
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: Physical inactivity and sedentary lifestyles are major risk factors of childhood obesity. This study aimed to measure physical activity (PA) levels by accelerometer and Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children (PAQ-C) among Senegalese school children and the relation with Body Mass Index (BMI) and body composition. Methodology: 156 pupils 8–11 years old were randomly selected in four elementary public schools of Dakar. BMI z-score was used to categorize children according to their weight status. PA was measured by PAQ-C in the 156 pupils and by accelerometer (Actigraph GT3X+, Pensacola, FL, USA) in a subsample of 42 children. Body composition was determined by deuterium dilution method. Results: PAQ-C results were comparable in the 156 and 42 pupils. The 42 pupils presented a light activity measured by accelerometer, while PAQ-C classified the majority of them (57%; n = 24) in the moderate PA level. Children spent most of their time (min/day) in sedentary activities and light activities than in moderate and intense activity levels. Accumulation of 60 min/day Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA) was achieved by 54.8% (n = 23) of the pupils. MVPA decreased in girls in relation to their body fatness. There was a significant difference in MVPA between boys and girls. Similarly, overweight/obese (45 ± 16 min/day) children had lower MVPA than their normal and underweight peers (88 ± 34 and 74 ± 36 min/day, respectively; p = 0.004). Conclusions: The two methods are inconsistent for measuring light and moderate PA levels. Although PAQ-C is an uncomplicated routine method, various activities were not adapted for genuine activities in Senegalese children and therefore needs to be validated in African children.

1. Background

Overweight and obesity are emerging public health problems in low- and middle-income countries. Economic transition, urbanization, dietary habits, lifestyles, and lack of physical activity have been reported as being largely responsible for the increased prevalence of obesity and related health risks [1,2,3]. Childhood obesity is a serious public health challenge as overweight and obese children are likely to stay obese and might develop non-communicable diseases (NCDs) during adulthood [4]. Elimination of physical inactivity would remove between 6% to 10% of the major NCDs such as cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and breast and colon cancers, while increasing life expectancy [5]. For positive health outcomes, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that children and youths aged 5–17 years should accumulate at least 60 min per day of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) [6]. The last Lancet Physical Activity Series reported that 80% of adolescent 13–15-year-olds do not meet these current physical activity recommendations [7]. These inappropriate behaviors are perceptible in most African countries and highlight the need for more physical activity surveillance data from Africa [8]. The prevalence of physical inactivity is defined as doing none or very little physical activity at work, at home, for transport, or during discretionary time. It has been reported that less than 50% of children and youths from African countries are physically active for at least 60 min a day at least three days a week [9,10]. In Senegal, few studies have investigated the physical activity level among school children or adolescents. In 2001, Bénéfice et al. using the CSA accelerometer model 7164 reported that Senegalese adolescent spent 50% of their time in sedentary activities, and most of the attending schoolgirls were less active than the non-attending school girls [11]. Recently, Djigue by using Cooper and Ruffier tests reported that overweight/obese children living in urban areas of Dakar were significantly less active than their non-obese peers [12]. However, none of these studies has addressed WHO recommendations on the practice of physical activity in school children. Furthermore, for the evaluation of physical activity level in children and adolescents, different objectives and subjective methods have been suggested, including behavioral observation, questionnaires, pedometry, accelerometry, and doubly labelled water technique [13,14,15,16,17]. Accelerometry method has been used recently in Mozambique [18], South Africa [19], Nigeria [20], and Kenya [21]. Accelerometers are electronic devices that measure the acceleration of body movement, and enable objective quantification of the frequency, duration, and intensity of physical activity. Accelerometry provides accurate physical activity data and sedentary behavior of people [22,23]. However, the method presents weaknesses that have in the past limited its use, including the inability to assess load carrying, upper body movement, and water activity. The Actigraph type accelerometers were found to be a reliable and valid criterion measure for physical activity among children and adolescents, and have been now widely recommended [24,25,26,27]. The questionnaires constitute an alternative method, less expensive and frequently used in epidemiological studies. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) was developed by WHO in 1998 to facilitate the monitoring of physical activity based on a worldwide standard. It has been validated in 12 developed countries and translated into several languages (French, Spanish, Italian, and Chinese) including recently Hausa, a Nigerian local language [20,28]. The PAQ-C (Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children) was developed to measure physical activity among children aged 8–14 years [14]. It is a seven-day recall questionnaire developed to measure physical activity (PA) level of children. Nevertheless, using PAQ-C questionnaire in children is problematic because they may have difficulty understanding questions and recalling activities accurately. In the last 10 years, Senegal, as other sub-Saharan African countries, has made remarkable progress on the enrolment rate in primary school (96%), but there is limited evidence on objectively measure of physical activity in school-aged children. The present study aimed to provide technical preliminary data on physical activity among Senegalese public school children in urban areas of Dakar using two commonly instruments, PAQ-C, and accelerometer.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Design and Subjects

The study used a two-stage stratified sampling design. In the first stage, four elementary public schools were randomly selected from the 149 schools of the Academic Inspection of Dakar. In the second stage, 156 pupils, 8–11 years old (39 in each school) were randomly recruited. The physical activity (PA) level was measured in all 156 by PAQ-C. Then, 42 pupils (20 boys and 22 girls) were selected for accelerometer measurements. Among the 156 children, only 9 children were overweight/obese and were all included in the accelerometer measurements. The other groups (underweight and normal weight) were randomly selected within the 147 (156–159) children to get the same number of boys and girls. Inclusion criteria were children with good general health and without physical disability and psychiatric illness. In this subgroup, PA was measured both by accelerometer and PAQ-C.

2.2. Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

The study was approved by the institutional ethical committee of the University Cheikh Anta Diop of Dakar (0011/2014/CER/UCAD) and authorized by the Ministry of Education. Informed parental consent and child assent were obtained from all participants before enrollment. Study objectives and testing procedures were explained to both pedagogical team and parents. All the data were collected during the full school year.

2.3. Anthropometry

Anthropometric measurements were performed in all the 156 children using standardized procedures. Body weight was measured without excess outer clothing to the nearest 50 g using electronic scales (Seca 869 GmbH & Co., Hamburg, Germany). Height was measured to the nearest 0.5 cm using a portable height device (Olney, MD, USA). Height-for-age z-scores (HAZ), and Body Mass Index for age z-score (BMIZ) were calculated using WHO growth standard reference for children and youth 5–19 years of age. BMIZ was used to categorize pupils as normal weight (−2 ≤ BMIZ ≥ +1), underweight (BMIZ < −2) or overweight/obese (BMIZ > +1) groups [29]. Waist circumference (WC) was measured at a level midway between the lower rib margin and iliac crest using a tape with 1 mm accuracy (Lufkin, Baltimore, MD, USA), and the value of waist/hip ratio ≥0.5 was used to determine abdominal obesity. All the measures were performed twice. The reproducibility of the measurements were assessed by using the coefficient of variation from the duplicated measurement. CV% values of less than 5% were acceptable.

2.3.1. Body Composition

Body composition (fat free mass, fat mass, % body fat) was measured by deuterium dilution method using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometry (FTIR IR-Affinity, Shimadzu, Nakagyo-Ku, Kyoto, Japan). Fat-free mass was calculated considering the hydration factor which varies according to age and sex among children [30].

2.3.2. Physical Activity (PA) Assessment

Accelerometer

PA was measured using a GT3X+ triaxial monitor (ActiGraph, Pensacola, FL, USA). The monitor in conjunction with the ActiLife software version 6.9.3 (ActiGraph, Pensacola, FL, USA) application, deliver objective measure of physical activity including raw acceleration. Each child wore the monitor for seven consecutive days except for water-based activities [31].
The monitor was positioned on the right mid-axilla line at the level of the iliac crest. Raw accelerometer data were recorded in 15-s epochs, and immediately upon retrieval, the data were collapsed to 60 s epochs and analyzed using Actilife software version 6.9.3 (Actigraph, Pensacola, FL, USA). Data were validated if the subject had at least four valid days of data, including one weekend day with greater than 10 h/day of wear time. The wear time was determined according to Troiano method [32]. A valid day was defined as recording at least 600 min of measured wear time between 07:00 a.m. to bedtime 22:59 [33]. Several cut-off point have been proposed to estimate PA intensity in children [24,25,26,27]. However, as reported by Trost et al., and Romanzini et al., those of Evenson provided acceptable classification accuracy for all four levels of physical activity intensity and performed well among children of all ages [23,34]. In our study, we used the cut-off of Evenson et al. to create fours PA levels expressed in count per minute (cpm): sedentary (0–100 cpm), light (101–2295 cpm), moderate (2296–4011 cpm), and vigorous (≥4012 cpm) [25]. The actigraph monitor also records the time/percentage of time spent in sedentary behaviors and the number of minutes per day spent in Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA). MVPA was analyzed to identify the children who have accumulated at least 60 min of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity daily as recommended by WHO [6].

PAQ-C Questionnaire

After the two stages stratified sampling yelling to a sample size of 156 children, all the children were measured for PAQ-C. Then, 42 were selected among the 156 and re-measured after seven days of accelerometer data collection. The PAQ-C contains 10 items and adapted only for measuring PA level [14]. The first item is an activity checklist including several common sports, leisure activities, and games. The remaining items (2–8) assess activity during specific periods of the day, including physical education (PE) class, recess, lunch, immediately after school, evening, and the weekend, as well as two additional questions that assess overall activity patterns during the week. The ninth item concerns the frequency of performed activities (games, sports, dance, ...) each day during the week, and the item 10th focuses on child health. Each question, except the item 10th is scored using a scale that ranges from 1 to 5. The mean of the items is used to calculate the final PAQ-C summary score. PA level was classified using Kowalski scores: Light (score = 1), Moderate (score = 2–4), and Vigorous (score = 5) that indicates a higher level of activity [14].

Leisure-Time Sedentary Behavior

A structured questionnaire was used to collect demographic and socio-economic characteristics, sedentary lifestyles, physical activity, nutrition knowledge, attitude, and dietary practices of the child. In the sedentary lifestyles section, information on child activities during their leisure time such as television viewing, computer use, game playing, and outdoor activities was collected.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Data were computed using Epidata version 3.1 (The Epidata Association, Odense, Denmark), WHO AnthroPlus version 1.04 (WHO, Geneva, Switzerland), Excel 97-2003 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) and Stata/Special 11.1 (STATA Corporation, College Station, TX, USA) Softwares. Characteristics of the children were presented as mean ± SD and percentage. Mean differences by sex were compared using independent-sample t-test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) associated with a post hoc test (Bonferroni) to compare children according to the weight status. Yate’s chi-square was used to compare the physical activity levels by sex and by weight status. Pearson correlation was used to assess the association between variables. p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of the Pupils

Descriptive characteristics of the children by sex and weight status are shown in Table 1. The 42 pupils comprised 20 males and 22 females. Mean age was 9.9 ± 1 years with mean BMIZ of −0.38 ± 1.3, and mean HAZ of 0.20 ± 1.14. Any significant difference related to age, BMI z-score and HAZ was observed between boys and girls. Stunting (HAZ < −2) affected two children (one girl and one boy). According to BMIZ, 12 children were underweight (BMIZ < −2), 21 had normal weight (BMIZ ≥ −2), and 9 were overweight/obese (BMIZ > +1). Fat free mass was significantly higher (p = 0.003) and % body fat lower (p = 0.012) in boys compared to girls. Abdominal obesity, defined by waist:hip ratio ≥ 0.5, was observed in two boys and one girl. Analysis of the sedentary behavior showed that the same lifestyles were observed in boys as in girls. Most of them (55%) spent their time watching television/or playing computer/games rather than doing outdoor playing or active team sports with their friends.

3.2. PA Level and Sedentary Behaviors by Accelerometer

All the 42 children were included in the accelerometer data analysis because they provided at least four valid days of wear time, and wore the Actigraph for an average of 13 ± 1 h per valid day. For the number of valid days, 26 pupils wore the accelerometer for seven consecutive days and the remaining 16 children for four to six days. The mean duration of the actigraph wearing (6 ± 1 days) was comparable between boys and girls and between weight groups (Table 2 and Table 3). Mean cpm was 1242 ± 332 (range from 721 to 2168 cpm). All the children presented light PA level according to Evenson cut-off. The children spent most of their time (min/day) in sedentary (422 ± 83) and light (302 ± 59) activities than in moderate (53 ± 20) and vigorous (21 ± 16) activities and any differences were observed by sex and weight status in the time spent in each activity intensity. Overweight/obese pupils spent less time in moderate (p = 0.022) and vigorous (p = 0.008) activities than their normal and underweight counterpart (Table 2 and Table 3). Mean MVPA were significantly lower in girls than in boys (p = 0.049) and in overweight/obese children (45 ± 16 min/day; p = 0.005) compared to their normal (88 ± 34 min/day) and underweight (74 ± 36) peers. Fifty-five percent (55%; n = 23) of the children (52.2% for boys and 47.8% for girls; p = 0.516) accumulated 60 min/day MVPA as recommended by WHO for children and youths (Table 2). This proportion was significantly lower in overweight/obese than in normal weight pupils (69% vs. 8.7%; p = 0.014). A significant and negative correlation was observed between MVPA and % body mass in girls (r = −0.56; p = 0.012), but not in boys.

3.3. PA Level by PAQ-C Questionnaire

Mean PAQ-C score of the 156 children and of the subsample of 42 pupils were comparable (2.34 ± 0.74 vs. 2.42 ± 0.85; p = 0.549). However, PA score was significantly higher in boys than in girls among the 156 children (2.72 ± 0.66 vs. 1.96 ± 0.62; p = 0.0001), as well as among the subsample of 42 pupils (2.90 ± 0.60 vs. 1.98 ± 0.75; p = 0.0002). Light and moderate PA levels among the 156 (35% and 65%) were similar as those observed among the subsample of 42 pupils (43% and 57%) and the respective proportions were comparable (p > 0.05). The PA level of the subsample of the 42 children was presented by sex (Table 2) and by weight status (Table 3). The proportion of children in light and moderate PA levels was comparable in the weight status groups. According to sex, the proportion of school children engaged in light PA (3 boys and 15 girls) and that of pupils engaged in moderate PA (17 boys and 7 girls) was significantly different (p = 0.001). Indeed, boys were more engaged in moderate activity than girls and inversely. However, these differences were not observed when data were analyzed according to weight status. None of the children presented an intense activity level (score = 5).

3.4. Physical Activity Level Comparison

The comparison the results of physical activity from accelerometer and PAQ-C shows that both methods were consistent for the sedentary activity (Table 2), but classified the children differently in terms of light or moderate PA levels. The accelerometer classified all the pupils (100%) in the light PA level according to Evenson cut-off, and indicated that children spent less time in moderate-to-vigorous activity, while PAQ-C classed 43% (n = 18) and 57% of them (n = 24) in light and moderate PA levels, respectively.

4. Discussion

The purpose of the study was to measure physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviors among Senegalese children between 8 to 11 years of age attending public elementary school in urban areas of Dakar. PA level was measured both by accelerometer and PAQ-C questionnaire. The two methods were distinct despite allowing the classification of children in different levels of physical activity. The accelerometer measures the electrical pulses of each acceleration and/or deceleration over a given period of time (seconds, minutes, or hours) before transforming them into digital data expressed as counts per minute, while PAQ-C assess the general PA level using score. Few published data exist on objective measure of physical activity using accelerometer among school children in sub-Saharan Africa [18,19,20,21]. Our accelerometer data were valid and consistent with the quality control accelerometer data processing since all the children wore the actigraph for at least four days, during 10 h per valid day including at least one valid weekend day [31,32,33]. In this study, we used the cut-off proposed by Evenson developed in children aged 5–16 years including black children [25]. Children spent 65% and 28% of their time in sedentary and light PA level. This result was consistent with previous data published by Benefice et al. among Senegalese adolescent girls in Niakhar, a rural area of Senegal [11]. Predominant light PA level in children and adolescents was also reported from South Africa and Mozambique [18,19]. More than 50% of the African children reached WHO recommendations for moderate-to-vigorous-activity but spent most of their times in light and sedentary activities. Supporting the practice of more moderate and vigorous exercises should be addressed to the school children particularly to the overweight/obese pupils. Although these studies have used different cut-off developed by Puyau, Evenson, and Treuth [24,25,35], the PA level detected were comparable. By contrast, when the habitual physical activity was transformed into MVPA, there was a difference in the time spent on moderate-to-vigorous PA across the studies. This variability makes data comparisons between studies and compliance with MVPA guidelines difficult, highlighting the need to harmonize cut-off values while using acceleromter in different population. To date, there is no consensus about accelerometer cut-off, but those developed by Evenson have been highly recommended as it provided acceptable classification accuracy for all four levels of physical activity intensity, and performed well among children of all ages [25,34]. In our study, weight and sex-based differences were observed in MVPA as persistently reported in the literature. Boys spent significantly more time in MVPA than girls, and overweight/obese pupils less time than their normal and underweight peers. Yet, overall, children spent only 6.6% of their time in MVPA (75 ± 35 min/day) like in Kenyan and South African children with comparable age, even though the Kenyan and South African studies were performed in a bigger sample size than our study [19,36]. In contrast, MVPA was higher in a sample of rural Mozambican and Ugandan children including adolescents [18,37]. These differences could be explained by the age of the children, and/or their living conditions (urban vs.rural areas). The proportion of children who met the WHO guidelines was higher in the Senegalese than in the Kenyan and South African pupils [19,20,21]. The main difference between such countries lies in the level of the economic development, Kenya and South Africa are emerging countries, while Senegal is still a developing country. In this study, 90% of the children who practice at least 60 min/day of MVPA were in normal or underweight status, a small proportion of overweight/obese children met that goal. Similar results have been reported from previous studies in Senegalese, as well as in South Africa, Kenya, and Canada in children and adolescents [11,19,21,22], indicating that overweight children are significantly less likely to practice physical activity than their healthy and underweight peers. Senegalese school children reported active transport to and from school, neverthless, PAQ-C categorized the majority of them in moderate level of PA, like in Nigerian, Malaysian, and Canadian children and adolescents [38,39,40,41], indicating that PAQ-C detects mainly moderate level of PA in children whatever their country of origin. PA level determined by PAQ-C was also sex dependent; girls were more engaged in light activity than boys. Such findings are consistent with early studies [38,39,40,41,42], and could be related to the type and or intensity of activities practiced during their leisure-time. Light PA detected by accelerometer and partially by the PAQ-C among the Senegalese children could be related to the hours spent sitting classroom (5–6 h) and probably to their sedentary lifestyles during their leisure-time (watching TV, playing computer/games, etc.) as previously demonstrated by Muthuri et al. in meta-analysis among sub-Saharan school-aged children [43]. Nevertheless, this study confirmed that the two methods of PA level assessment (accelerometer and PAQ-C) classify differently school children aged 8–11 years. These results are consistent with other studies [19,44,45,46,47]. It is not surprising that PA levels provided by both instruments were different. The accelerometer directly measures the accelerations induced by body movement, and it allows it to accurately capture certain movements, such as swimming or cycling; whereas the PAQ-C was designed to detect frequency of a specific behavior and provides an estimate of PA level using a recall memory. The collected information from the PAQ-C for such measure might be influenced by the desirability to report subjective behaviors, leading to under- or overestimating the global physical activity. Also, various activities listed in the PAQ-C questionnaire (cross country skiing, ice hockey, badminton, aerobics, ringette, hockey, skateboarding, baseball, softball, etc.) were not adapted to our African context and deserve to be reconsidered. These hypotheses were confirmed by several authors who found that questionnaire tend to overestimate by 36% to 173% [48,49] or underestimate by 28% [50] PA level measured using accelerometer. PAQ-C appears to have a moderate reliability [51,52], but its validity was not well established, due to the complexity of PA and sedentary behaviors measurements and the use of an appropriate gold standard method as described by Kelly et al. in a recent published debate [53].

5. Conclusions

The study found considerable differences in both accelerometer and PAQ-C questionnaire to measures PA level in school-aged children. PAQ-C detect light and moderate activity level, while accelerometers indicated that children spent most time in sedentary and light than in moderate-to-vigorous activity intensity. This preliminary study shows that accelerometer and PAQ-C were not equivalent for the measurement of physical activity in children. Accelerometers provide data interpretable in terms of public health, but require close monitoring to get valid data. PAQ-C appears to be an easy-to-use and alternative tool for physical activity surveillance and monitoring, but it needs to be adapted to the environmental genuine activities of African children. Overweight/obese pupils spend more time in sedentary activities and did not meet WHO recommendations. Supporting the practice of moderate exercise at least one hour a day to prevent overweight/obesity and related chronic diseases risk among school-aged children is a key recommendation of this study, although it has some limitations including the small sample size. In addition, the study was conducted in urban public school settings, therefore, observations and conclusions cannot be generalized in all Senegalese school children, especially those in private schools. Further large scale studies are required to assess the extent of PA level among public and private school-aged children in Senegal.

Acknowledgments

The study was funded by IAEA through the regional project RAF/6/042 and the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research of Senegal under the PAPES subvention (Projet d’Appui aux Enseignantes-Chercheures du Sénégal). The authors are grateful to The Ministry of Education of Senegal, the Academic Inspection of Dakar, all the school Directors, the pupils and their parents who participated in this study.

Author Contributions

Adama Diouf coordinated the research project, designed, implemented the study, and wrote the manuscript. Adama Diouf, Mbeugué Thiam, Ousmane Diongue, and Ndé Mégné were responsible for the data collection, analysis, and quality control checking. Nicole Idohou-Dossou provided support for data management. Pape Malick Sembène and Khady Diallo were involved in the implementation of the study. Salimata Wade supervised the research project and reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The research was initiated by the Laboratoire de Nutrition, Département de Biologie Animale, Facultés des Sciences et Techniques, Université Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar, Sénégal, in collaboration with the Ministry of Education of Senegal through the Division du Contrôle Médical Scolaire.

References

  1. World Health Organisation (WHO). Global Health Risks: Mortality and Burden of Disease Attributable to Selected Major Risks; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009; p. 70. [Google Scholar]
  2. Tremblay, M.S.; Colley, R.C.; Saunders, T.J.; Healy, G.N.; Owen, N. Physiological and health implications of a sedentary lifestyle. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 2010, 35, 725–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Assah, F.K.; Mbanya, J.C.; Ekelund, U.L.F.; Wareham, N.J.; Brage, S. Urbanization, physical activity and metabolic health in Sub-Saharan Africa. Diabetes Care 2011, 34, 491–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Biro, F.M.; Wien, M. Childhood obesity and adult morbidities. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1991, 5, 1499S–1505S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lee, M.I.; Shiroma, E.J.; Lobelo, F.; Puska, P.; Blair, S.N.; Katzmarzyk, P.T. Impact of physical inactivity on the world’s major non-communicable diseases. Lancet 2012, 380, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. World Health Organization (WHO). Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2010; p. 60. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hallal, P.C.; Andersen, L.B.; Bull, F.C.; Guthold, R.; Haskell, W.; Ekelund, U. Global physical activity levels: Surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet 2012, 380, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Guthold, R.; Cowan, M.J.; Autenrieth, C.S.; Kann, L.; Riley, L.M. Physical activity and sedentary behavior among school children: A 34-country comparison. J. Pediatr. 2010, 157, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Micklesfield, L.K.; Pedro, T.M.; Kahn, K.; Kinsman, J.; Pettifor, J.M.; Tollman, S.; Norris, S.A. Physical activity and sedentary behavior among adolescents in rural South Africa: Levels, patterns and correlates. BMC Public Health 2014, 14, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Peltzer, K. Health behavior and protective factors among school children in four African countries. Int. J. Behav. Med. 2009, 16, 172–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Bénéfice, E.; Garnier, D.; Ndiaye, G. Assessment of physical activity among rural Senegalese adolescent girls: Influence of age, sexual maturation, and body composition. J. Adolesc. Health 2001, 28, 319–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Djigué, E.O. Evaluation de Paramètres Anthropométriques et de L’aptitude Physique D’enfants en Surpoids de la Région de Dakar (Sénégal). Master’s Thesis, Institut National Supérieur et d’Education Populaire et du Sport (INSEPS), Université Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar, Dakar, Senegal, 2012; p. 57. [Google Scholar]
  13. McKenzie, T.L. The use of direct observation to assess physical activity. In Physical Activity Assessments for Health-Related Research; Welk, G., Ed.; Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL, USA, 2002; pp. 179–195. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kowalski, K.C.; Crocker, P.R.E.; Donen, R.M. The Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children (PAQ-C) and Adolescents (PAQ-A) Manual; College of Kinesiology, University of Saskatchewan: Saskatoon, SK, Canada, 2004; p. 37. [Google Scholar]
  15. Janz, K.F.; Lutuchy, E.M.; Wenthe, P.; Levy, S.M. Measuring activity in children and adolescents using self-report: PAQ-C and PAQ-A. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2008, 40, 767–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. De Cocker, K.; Cardon, G.; de Bourdeaudhuij, I. Pedometer determined physical activity and its comparison with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire in a sample of Belgian adults. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 2007, 78, 429–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Assessment of Body Composition and Total Energy Expenditure in Humans Using Stable Isotope Techniques; IAEA Human Health Series No. 3: Vienna, Austria, 2009; p. 146. [Google Scholar]
  18. Prista, A.; Nhantumbo, L.; Saranga, S. Physical activity assessed by accelerometry in rural African school-age children and adolescents. Pediatr. Exerc. Sci. 2009, 21, 384–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Craig, E.; Bland, R.; Reilly, J. Objectively measured physical activity levels of children and adolescents in rural South Africa: High volume of physical activity at low intensity. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 2012, 38, 81–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Oyeyemi, A.L.; Umar, M.; Oguche, F.; Aliyu, S.U.; Oyeyemi, A.Y. Accelerometer-determined physical activity and its comparison with the international physical activity questionnaire in a sample of Nigerian adults. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e87233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Muthuri, S.K.; Wachira, L.M.; Vincent, O.; Onywera, V.O.; Tremblay, M.S. Direct and self-reported measures of physical activity and sedentary by weight status in school-aged children: Results from ISCOLE-Kenya. Ann. Hum. Biol. 2014, 42, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Colley, R.C.; Garriguet, D.; Janssen, I.; Craig, C.L.; Clarke, J.; Tremblay, M.S. Activité physique des enfants et des jeunes au Canada: Résultats d’accéléromètre de l’enquête canadienne sur les mesures de la santé de 2007–2009. Rapports Sur La Santé 2011, 22, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  23. Romanzini, M.; Petroski, E.L.; Reichert, F.F. Accelerometers thresholds to estimate physical activity intensity in children andadolescents: A systematic review. Rev. Bras. Cineantropom. Desempenho Hum. 2012, 14, 101–113. [Google Scholar]
  24. Puyau, M.R.; Adolph, L.; Vohra, F.A.; Butte, N.F. Validation and calibration of physical activity monitors in children. Obes. Res. 2002, 10, 150–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Evenson, K.R.; Catellier, D.J.; Gill, K.; Ondrak, K.S.; McMurray, R.G. Calibration of two objective measures of physical activity for children. J. Sports Sci. 2008, 26, 1557–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Pulsford, R.M.; Cortina-Borja, M.; Rich, C.; Kinnafick, F.E.; Dezateux, C.; Griffiths, L.J. Actigraph accelerometer-defined boundaries for sedentary behavior and physical activity intensities in 7 year old children. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e21822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Reilly, J.J.; Coyle, J.; Kelly, L.; Burke, G.; Grant, S.; Paton, J.Y. An objective method for measurement of sedentary behavior in 3- to 4-year olds. Obes. Res. 2003, 11, 1155–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Craig, C.L.; Marshall, A.L.; Sjostrom, M.; Bauman, A.; Booth, M.L.; Ainsworth, B.E.; Pratt, M.; Ekelund, U.; Yngve, A.; Sallis, J.F.; et al. International Physical Activity Questionnaire: 12-Country reliability and validity. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2003, 35, 1381–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. De Onis, M.; Onyango, A.W.; Borghi, E.; Siyam, A.; Nishida, C.; Siekmann, J. Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents. Bull. World Health Organ. 2007, 85, 660–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Lohman, T.G. Applicability of body composition techniques and constants for children and youth. Exerc. Sports Sci. Rev. 1986, 14, 325–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Trost, S.G.; Pate, R.R.; Freedson, P.S.; Sallis, J.F.; Taylor, W.C. Using objective physical activity measures with youth: How many days of monitoring are needed? Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2000, 32, 426–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Troiano, R.P. Large-scale applications of accelerometers: New frontiers and new questions. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2007, 39, 1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Rich, C.; Geraci, M.; Griffiths, L.; Sera, F.; Dezateux, C.; Cortina-Borja, M. Quality control methods in accelerometer data processing: Defining minimum wear time. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e67206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Trost, S.G.; Loprinzi, P.D.; Moore, R.; Pfeiffer, K.A. Comparison of accelerometer cut points for predicting activity intensity in youth. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2011, 43, 1360–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Treuth, M.S.; Schmitz, K.; Catellier, D.J.; McMurray, R.G.; Murray, D.M.; Almeida, M.J.; Going, S.; Norman, J.E.; Pate, R. Defining accelerometer thresholds for physical activity intensities in adolescent girls. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2004, 36, 1259–1266. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Ojiambo, R.M.; Easton, C.; Casajús, J.A.; Konstabel, K.; Reilly, J.J.; Pitsiladis, Y. Effect of urbanization on objectively measured physical activity levels, sedentary time, and indices of adiposity in Kenyan adolescents. J. Phys. Act. Health 2012, 9, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Richards, J.; Foster, C. The impact of a Sport-for-Development Programme on the physical activity levels of young adolescent boys in Gulu, Northern Uganda. In Proceedings of the Be Active 2012 Conference, Sydney, Australia, 26–28 September 2012; pp. S257–S258.
  38. Olubusola, E.J.; Adebimp, O.O.; Faniran, T. Physical activity levels of school-aged children and adolescents in Ile-Ife Nigeria. Med. Sport 2013, 17, 176–181. [Google Scholar]
  39. Senbanjo, I.O.; Oshikoya, K.A. Physical activity and body mass index of school children and adolescents in Abeokuta, Southwest Nigeria. World J. Pediatr. 2010, 6, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Dans, P.; Mohd Nasir, M.T.; Zalilah, M.S. Determination of factors associated with physical activity levels among adolescents attending school in Kuantan. Malays. J. Nutr. 2011, 17, 175–187. [Google Scholar]
  41. Storey, K.E.; Forbes, L.E.; Fraser, S.N.; Spence, J.C.; Plotnikoff, R.C.; Raine, K.D.; Hanning, R.M.; McCargar, L.J. Diet quality, nutrition and physical activity among adolescents: The Web-SPAN (Web-Survey of Physical Activity and Nutrition) project. Public Health Nutr. 2009, 12, 2009–2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Al-Nuaim, A.A.; Al-Nakeeb, Y.; Lyons, M.; Al-Hazzaa, H.M.; Nevill, A.; Collins, P.; Duncan, M.J. The prevalence of physical activity and sedentary behaviors relative to obesity among adolescents from Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia: Rural versus urban variations. J. Nutr. Metab. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Muthuri, S.K.; Wachira, L.J.; Leblanc, A.G.; Francis, C.E.; Sampson, M.; Onywera, V.O.; Mark, S.T. Temporal trends and correlates of physical activity, sedentary behavior, and physical fitness among school-aged children in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 3327–3359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. McVeigh, J.; Meiring, R. Physical activity and sedentary behavior in an ethnically diverse group of South African school children. J. Sports Sci. Med. 2014, 13, 371–378. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Corder, K.; van Sluijs, E.M.F.; Wright, A.; Whincup, P.; Wareham, N.J.; Ekelund, U.L.F. Is it possible to assess free-living physical activity and energy expenditure in young people by self-report? Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 89, 862–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Sabia, S.; Hees, V.T.V.; Shipley, M.J.; Trenell, M.I.; Hagger-Johnson, G.; Elbaz, A.; Kivimaki, M.; Singh-Manoux, A. Association between questionnaire and accelerometer assessed physical activity: The role of sociodemographic factors. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2014, 179, 781–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kavanaugh, K.; Moore, J.B.; Hibbett, L.J.; Kaczynski, A.T. Correlates of subjectively and objectively measured physical activity in young adolescents. J. Sport Health Sci. 2015, 4, 222–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Adamo, K.B.; Prince, S.A.; Tricco, A.C.; Connor-Gorber, S.; Tremblay, M.A. comparison of indirect versus direct measures for assessing physical activity in the pediatric population: A systematic review. Int. J. Pediatr. Obes. 2009, 4, 2–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Lee, P.H.; Macfarlane, D.J.; Lam, T.H.; Stewart, S.M. Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF): A systematic review. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2011, 8, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Boon, R.M.; Hamlin, M.J.; Steel, G.D.; Ross, J.J. Validation of the New Zealand Physical Activity Questionnaire (NZPAQ-LF) and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-LF) with accelerometry. Br. J. Sports Med. 2014, 44, 741–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Helmerhorst, H.J.; Brage, S.; Warren, W.; Besson, H.; Ekelund, U. A systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnaires. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2012, 9, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Tessier, S.; Vuillemin, A.; Briançon, S. Revue des questionnaires de mesure de l’activité physique validés chez les enfants et les adolescents. Sci. Sports 2008, 23, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kelly, P.; Fitzsimons, C.; Baker, G. Should we reframe how we think about physical activity and sedentary behavior measurement? Validity and reliability reconsidered. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2016, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of the school-aged children.
Table 1. Characteristics of the school-aged children.
CharacteristicsAll (n = 42)Boys (n = 20)Girls (n = 22)p
Age (year)9 ± 110 ± 19 ± 10.092
Weight (kg)32.8 ± 934.1 ± 9.431.7 ± 8.60.404
Height (cm)139.6 ± 7.7142.1 ± 6.5137.3 ± 8.20.047
BMIZ−0.38 ± 1.50−0.46 ± 1.73−1.71 ± 1.310.741
Weight status, % (n) 0.677
 Underweight28.6 (12)35.0 (7)22.7 (5)
 Normal weight50.0 (21)45.0 (9)54.6 (12)
 Overweight/obese21.4 (9)20.0 (4)22.7 (5)
HAZ0.20 ± 1.140.05 ± 0.93−0.44 ± 1.270.161
Body composition
 Fat free mass (kg)22.9 ± 4.124.7 ± 3.821.1 ± 3.50.003
 Fat mass (kg)6.7 ± 5.15.7 ± 1.27.5 ±1.00.270
 % Fat mass20.616.524.20.012
Waist circumference (cm)56.8 ± 7.857.3 ± 8.0556.4 ± 7.70.692
Waist/hip ratio0.4 ± 0.040.4 ± 0.040.4 ± 0.030.647
Sedentary lifestyles, % (n)
 Eating frequently in front of television55.0 (23)47.8 (11)52.2 (12)0.889
 WatchingTV/computer/games every day55.0 (23)43.5 (10)56.5 (13)0.569
 Outdoor playing/active team sports33.0 (14)64.3 (9)35.7 (5)0.286
BMIZ: Body Mass Index z-score; HAZ: Height-for-age z-scores; Student t-test means comparison boys vs. girls; chi-square: comparison between proportions. Statistical significance is expressed as p < 0.05.
Table
Table 2. Physical activity and sedentary behaviors by sex.
Table 2. Physical activity and sedentary behaviors by sex.
VariablesOverall (n = 42)Boys (n = 20)Girls (n = 22)p
Accelerometer
Number of days accelerometer worn6 ± 16 ± 16 ± 10.578
Time (min/day) spent in various intensity 1
 Sedentary422 ± 83428 ± 89416 ± 790.645
 Light302 ± 59293 ± 57312 ± 620.320
 Moderate53 ± 2059 ± 2247 ± 160.056
 Vigorous21 ± 1625 ± 1816 ± 110.064
 MVPA 275 ± 3585 ± 4065 ± 280.049
 % Met 60 min MVPA daily, (n)54.8 (23)52.2 (12)47.8 (11)0.516
PAQ-C
Mean score2.42 ± 0.852.90 ± 0.61.98 ± 0.750.0002
% PA level, (n) 0.001
 Light (score = 1)43.0 (18)15.0 (3)68.2 (15)
 Moderate (score = 2–5)57.0 (24)85.0 (17)31.8 (7)
1 According to Evenson cut-off; 2 MVPA: Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity; PA: physical activity; Student t-test: mean comparison boys vs. girls; chi-square: comparison proportions by sex. Statistical significance is expressed as p < 0.05.
Table
Table 3. Physical activity and sedentary behaviors by weight status.
Table 3. Physical activity and sedentary behaviors by weight status.
VariablesWeight Status
Normal (n = 21)Underweight (n = 12)Overweight/Obese (n = 9)p
Accelerometer
Number of days of wearing6 ± 16 ± 15 ± 10.950
Time (min/day) spent in various intensity 1
 Sedentary416 ± 89422 ± 83435 ± 780.859
 Light395 ± 67316 ± 48303 ± 560.640
 Moderate58 ± 19 a53 ± 21 a37 ± 12 b,c0.022
 Vigorous26 ± 15 a20 ± 16 a8 ± 4 b,c0.008
 MVPA 288 ± 34 a74 ± 36 a45 ± 16 c,d0.004
 % Met 60 min MVPA daily, (n)69.6 (16)21.7 (5)8.7 (2)0.014
PAQ-C mean score2.35 ± 0.992.61 ± 0.822.31 ± 0.490.645
% PA level, (n) 0.765
 Light (score = 1)47.6 (10)41.7 (5)33.3 (3)0.765
 Moderate (score = 2–4)52.4 (11)58.3 (7)66.7 (6)
1 According to Evenson cut-off points; 2 MVPA: Moderate-to vigorous physical activity; In the same line, means with similar superscripts differ at p < 0.01; chi-square: comparison proportions by weight status. Statistical significance is expressed as p < 0.05.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Diouf, A.; Thiam, M.; Idohou-Dossou, N.; Diongue, O.; Mégné, N.; Diallo, K.; Sembène, P.M.; Wade, S. Physical Activity Level and Sedentary Behaviors among Public School Children in Dakar (Senegal) Measured by PAQ-C and Accelerometer: Preliminary Results. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 998. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13100998

AMA Style

Diouf A, Thiam M, Idohou-Dossou N, Diongue O, Mégné N, Diallo K, Sembène PM, Wade S. Physical Activity Level and Sedentary Behaviors among Public School Children in Dakar (Senegal) Measured by PAQ-C and Accelerometer: Preliminary Results. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2016; 13(10):998. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13100998

Chicago/Turabian Style

Diouf, Adama, Mbeugué Thiam, Nicole Idohou-Dossou, Ousmane Diongue, Ndé Mégné, Khady Diallo, Pape Malick Sembène, and Salimata Wade. 2016. "Physical Activity Level and Sedentary Behaviors among Public School Children in Dakar (Senegal) Measured by PAQ-C and Accelerometer: Preliminary Results" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 13, no. 10: 998. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13100998

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop