Next Article in Journal
Food Safety, a Global Challenge
Next Article in Special Issue
Response to Madans et al. Comments on Sabariego et al. Measuring Disability: Comparing the Impact of Two Data Collection Approaches on Disability Rates. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2015, 12, 10329–10351
Previous Article in Journal
Technologies for Arsenic Removal from Water: Current Status and Future Perspectives
Previous Article in Special Issue
Measuring Disability: Comparing the Impact of Two Data Collection Approaches on Disability Rates
Article Menu

Export Article

Comment of Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13(1), 66.

Open AccessComment
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13(1), 65; doi:10.3390/ijerph13010065

Comments on Sabariego et al. Measuring Disability: Comparing the Impact of Two Data Collection Approaches on Disability Rates. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2015, 12, 10329–10351

1
National Center for Health Statistics, 3311 Toledo Rd., Hyattsville, MD 20782, USA
2
Leonard Cheshire Disability and Development Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK
These authors contributed equally to this work.
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Paul B. Tchounwou
Received: 2 October 2015 / Accepted: 16 December 2015 / Published: 22 December 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Disability and Public Health)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [157 KB, uploaded 23 December 2015]
Note: In lieu of an abstract, this is an excerpt from the first page.

Excerpt

In the article, Measuring Disability: Comparing the Impact of Two Data Collection Approaches on Disability Rates, in Volume 12 of the Journal International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Carla Sabariego et al. [1] raise several issues regarding the use of the short set of questions developed by the Washington Group on Disability Statistics (WG) as compared with the approach to disability measurement proposed through the Model Disability Survey (MDS). We address these below. [...] View Full-Text
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Madans, J.H.; Mont, D.; Loeb, M. Comments on Sabariego et al. Measuring Disability: Comparing the Impact of Two Data Collection Approaches on Disability Rates. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2015, 12, 10329–10351. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 65.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health EISSN 1660-4601 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top