Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11(3), 2456-2471; doi:10.3390/ijerph110302456

Yes, The Government Should Tax Soft Drinks: Findings from a Citizens’ Jury in Australia

1,2,†email, 1email, 1,2,3email, 1,2email, 4,5email, 1,2email, 1,2email, 1,2email and 1,2,†,* email
Received: 31 December 2013; in revised form: 14 February 2014 / Accepted: 17 February 2014 / Published: 27 February 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Economics of the Prevention and Treatment of Obesity)
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract: Taxation has been suggested as a possible preventive strategy to address the serious public health concern of childhood obesity. Understanding the public’s viewpoint on the potential role of taxation is vital to inform policy decisions if they are to be acceptable to the wider community. A Citizens’ Jury is a deliberative method for engaging the public in decision making and can assist in setting policy agendas. A Citizens’ Jury was conducted in Brisbane, Australia in May 2013 to answer the question: Is taxation on food and drinks an acceptable strategy to the public in order to reduce rates of childhood obesity? Citizens were randomly selected from the electoral roll and invited to participate. Thirteen members were purposively sampled from those expressing interest to broadly reflect the diversity of the Australian public. Over two days, participants were presented with evidence on the topic by experts, were able to question witnesses and deliberate on the evidence. The jurors unanimously supported taxation on sugar-sweetened drinks but generally did not support taxation on processed meats, snack foods and foods eaten/ purchased outside the home. They also supported taxation on snack foods on the condition that traffic light labelling was also introduced. Though they were not specifically asked to deliberate strategies outside of taxation, the jurors strongly recommended more nutritional information on all food packaging using the traffic light and teaspoon labelling systems for sugar, salt and fat content. The Citizens’ Jury suggests that the general public may support taxation on sugar-sweetened drinks to reduce rates of obesity in children. Regulatory reforms of taxation on sugar-sweetened drinks and improved labelling of nutritional information on product packaging were strongly supported by all members of the jury. These reforms should be considered by governments to prevent childhood obesity and the future burden on society from the consequences of obesity.
Keywords: taxation; childhood obesity; sweetened drinks; Citizens’ Jury; public engagement
PDF Full-text Download PDF Full-Text [228 KB, uploaded 19 June 2014 03:46 CEST]

Export to BibTeX |

MDPI and ACS Style

Moretto, N.; Kendall, E.; Whitty, J.; Byrnes, J.; Hills, A.P.; Gordon, L.; Turkstra, E.; Scuffham, P.; Comans, T. Yes, The Government Should Tax Soft Drinks: Findings from a Citizens’ Jury in Australia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 2456-2471.

AMA Style

Moretto N, Kendall E, Whitty J, Byrnes J, Hills AP, Gordon L, Turkstra E, Scuffham P, Comans T. Yes, The Government Should Tax Soft Drinks: Findings from a Citizens’ Jury in Australia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2014; 11(3):2456-2471.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moretto, Nicole; Kendall, Elizabeth; Whitty, Jennifer; Byrnes, Joshua; Hills, Andrew P.; Gordon, Louisa; Turkstra, Erika; Scuffham, Paul; Comans, Tracy. 2014. "Yes, The Government Should Tax Soft Drinks: Findings from a Citizens’ Jury in Australia." Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 11, no. 3: 2456-2471.

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health EISSN 1660-4601 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert