Sensors 2009, 9(11), 8610-8612; doi:10.3390/s91108610
Editorial

Pathogen Sensors

Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 225 S. University Street, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
Received: 19 October 2009; Accepted: 21 October 2009 / Published: 28 October 2009
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pathogen Sensors)
PDF Full-text Download PDF Full-Text [21 KB, uploaded 28 October 2009 09:05 CET]
Abstract: The development of sensors for detecting foodborne pathogens has been motivated by the need to produce safe foods and to provide better healthcare. However, in the more recent times, these needs have been expanded to encompass issues relating to biosecurity, detection of plant and soil pathogens, microbial communities, and the environment. The range of technologies that currently flood the sensor market encompass PCR and microarray-based methods, an assortment of optical sensors (including bioluminescence and fluorescence), in addition to biosensor-based approaches that include piezoelectric, potentiometric, amperometric, and conductometric sensors to name a few. More recently, nanosensors have come into limelight, as a more sensitive and portable alternative, with some commercial success. However, key issues affecting the sensor community is the lack of standardization of the testing protocols and portability, among other desirable elements, which include timeliness, cost-effectiveness, user-friendliness, sensitivity and specificity. [...]

Article Statistics

Load and display the download statistics.

Citations to this Article

Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Irudayaraj, J. Pathogen Sensors. Sensors 2009, 9, 8610-8612.

AMA Style

Irudayaraj J. Pathogen Sensors. Sensors. 2009; 9(11):8610-8612.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Irudayaraj, Joseph. 2009. "Pathogen Sensors." Sensors 9, no. 11: 8610-8612.

Sensors EISSN 1424-8220 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert