This article is
- freely available
Sensors 2009, 9(11), 8610-8612; doi:10.3390/s91108610
Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 225 S. University Street, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
Received: 19 October 2009 / Accepted: 21 October 2009 / Published: 28 October 2009
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pathogen Sensors)
Download PDF Full-Text [21 KB, uploaded 28 October 2009 09:05 CET]
Abstract: The development of sensors for detecting foodborne pathogens has been motivated by the need to produce safe foods and to provide better healthcare. However, in the more recent times, these needs have been expanded to encompass issues relating to biosecurity, detection of plant and soil pathogens, microbial communities, and the environment. The range of technologies that currently flood the sensor market encompass PCR and microarray-based methods, an assortment of optical sensors (including bioluminescence and fluorescence), in addition to biosensor-based approaches that include piezoelectric, potentiometric, amperometric, and conductometric sensors to name a few. More recently, nanosensors have come into limelight, as a more sensitive and portable alternative, with some commercial success. However, key issues affecting the sensor community is the lack of standardization of the testing protocols and portability, among other desirable elements, which include timeliness, cost-effectiveness, user-friendliness, sensitivity and specificity. [...]
Article StatisticsClick here to load and display the download statistics.
Notes: Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.
MDPI and ACS Style
Irudayaraj, J. Pathogen Sensors. Sensors 2009, 9, 8610-8612.AMA Style
Irudayaraj J. Pathogen Sensors. Sensors. 2009; 9(11):8610-8612.Chicago/Turabian Style
Irudayaraj, Joseph. 2009. "Pathogen Sensors." Sensors 9, no. 11: 8610-8612.