Next Article in Journal
Hopf Bifurcation and Vibration Control for a Thrust Magnetic Bearing with Variable Load Mass
Next Article in Special Issue
A Room Temperature VOCs Gas Sensor Based on a Layer by Layer Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes/Poly-ethylene Glycol Composite
Previous Article in Journal
Continuous and Real-Time Detection of Drinking-Water Pathogens with a Low-Cost Fluorescent Optofluidic Sensor
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Highly Sensitive Acetone Gas Sensor Based on g-C3N4 Decorated MgFe2O4 Porous Microspheres Composites

1
The Collaboration Innovation Center of Coal Safety Production of Henan Province, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, China
2
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, China
3
State Key Laboratory Cultivation Bases for Gas Geology and Gas Control, Jiaozuo 454000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2018, 18(7), 2211; https://doi.org/10.3390/s18072211
Submission received: 3 June 2018 / Revised: 2 July 2018 / Accepted: 6 July 2018 / Published: 10 July 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Nanomaterials based Gas Sensors)

Abstract

:
The g-C3N4 decorated magnesium ferrite (MgFe2O4) porous microspheres composites were successfully obtained via a one-step solvothermal method. The structure and morphology of the as-prepared MgFe2O4/g-C3N4 composites were characterized by the techniques of X-ray diffraction (XRD), field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), thermal gravity and differential scanning calorimeter (TG–DSC) and N2-sorption. The gas sensing properties of the samples were measured and compared with a pure MgFe2O4-based sensor. The maximum response of the sensor based on MgFe2O4/g-C3N4 composites with 10 wt % g-C3N4 content to acetone is improved by about 145 times, while the optimum temperature was lowered by 60 °C. Moreover, the sensing mechanism and the reason for improving gas sensing performance were also discussed.

1. Introduction

Acetone, as a highly volatile and flammable organic compound, is widely used in industries or laboratories as a solvent, chemical intermediate and industrial product [1]. Chronic exposure to an acetone atmosphere causes inflammation and may even cause damage to the liver and kidney, while acute poisoning can harm the central nervous system [2]. In addition, acetone is also a widely accepted breath biomarker for type-I and type-II diabetes [3,4]. Thus, fast and timely monitoring of the existence and concentration of acetone is of great importance for human safety and health.
Gas sensors based on metal oxide semiconductors (MOS) are attractive candidates due to their low cost, fast response and easy fabrication [5,6]. Thus, MOS-based gas sensors have been regarded as an important method of monitoring flammable and toxic gases. Up to now, several types of MOSs have been developed as gas-sensing materials to detect acetone, such as In2O3 [7], WO3 [8,9], SnO2 [10], La2O3 [11], Co3O4 [12], ZnO [13], α-Fe2O3 [14] and so on. However, the gas-sensing materials have limited properties, some of which are unable to satisfy the needs of practical applications. The development of high performing and stable acetone-sensing materials remains a challenging task.
In recent years, spinel ferrite MFe2O4 (M = Mg, Co, Ni, Zn, Mn, Cd, etc.) gas-sensing materials have attracted a significant amount of research interest due to their high selectivity and good chemical stability compared to traditional metal oxide semiconductor gas sensing materials [15]. As a magnetic n-type semiconductor, magnesium ferrite (MgFe2O4) has been used in the research field of gas sensing [16,17,18]. For example, Patil et al. successfully prepared two types of spinel MgFe2O4 thick films via a sol–gel process, which revealed that the best response to acetone vapor occurred at 350 °C and 450 °C, respectively [19]. However, experimental results have shown that MgFe2O4 gas sensing materials have obvious shortcomings, such as poor electrical characteristics and high working temperatures.
In order to improve the properties of gas sensors, compounding MOS with high specific surface area 2D nanomaterials has been proven to be an effective way of creating a synergistic effect through these components [20,21]. Li et al. synthesized Zn2SnO4 nanoparticles/reduced graphene oxide via a solvothermal route and found that the nanocomposites showed good sensitivity to ethanol [22]. Chen et al. synthesized WO3 microspheres loaded with small-size Pt-decorated graphene composite, which exhibited a high selectivity and sensitivity to low concentration acetone gas at the operating temperature of 200 °C [9]. As a new two-dimensional (2D) semiconductor, graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) possesses several advantages, such as high chemical stability, high specific surface area, unique electronic structure, facile preparation and non-toxicity [23,24]. Several previous studies focusing on g-C3N4 decorated various metal oxide composites proved that g-C3N4 plays a very important role in the composites. It not only enlarges the specific surface area and prevents agglomeration of metal oxide nanoparticles, but also forms a heterojunction with MOSs and provides new chemical and structural properties [25,26,27]. Cao et al. reported that SnO2/g-C3N4 nanocomposites show a favorable response to ethanol by a facile calcination method [28]. Hu et al. synthesized the 2D C3N4-tin oxide gas sensors by a one-step method for enhanced acetone vapor detection [29].
In this work, we report the synthesis of g-C3N4 nanosheet decorated MgFe2O4 porous microspheres composites via a one-step solvothermal method. With comparison of the gas-sensing properties of MgFe2O4/g-C3N4 composites with different g-C3N4 contents, including the sensitivity, stability and selectivity, we concluded that the properties of MgFe2O4-based sensors are remarkably improved due to the introduction of g-C3N4. In particular, the sensor based on 10 wt % g-C3N4 decorated MgFe2O4 porous microspheres exhibited the best gas-sensing performance.

2. Experimental

2.1. Preparation of the MgFe2O4/g-C3N4 Composites

All chemicals were of analytical purity and were used without further purification. Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) was synthesized by our previous reported method [30,31]. MgFe2O4/g-C3N4 composites were prepared by a facile solvothermal process. Typically, a certain mass of g-C3N4 was dissolved in 80 mL of ethylene glycol with ultrasonic treatment for 2 h. After this, 1.015 g of magnesium chloride hexahydrate (MgCl2·6H2O, 99.0%), 2.702 g of ferric chloride nonahydrate (FeCl3·9H2O, 99.0%) and 0.54 g of urea (CO(NH2)2, 99.0%) were added into the previously dispersed suspension with magnetic stirring for 30 min. Urea is mainly added in order to adjust the pH value of the solution. Finally, the mixture was transferred into a 100-mL stainless-steel Teflon-lined autoclave and kept for 24 h at 200 ℃ in an oven. The product was collected and washed with DI water and ethanol several times, before being finally dried at 60 ℃ for 24 h. The ratio of MgFe2O4/g-C3N4 composites was controlled by adjusting the weight of the g-C3N4 added. According to this process, the MgFe2O4/g-C3N4 composite with the 5 wt %, 10 wt % and 15 wt % contents of g-C3N4 decorated MgFe2O4 were prepared and marked as MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-5, MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-10 and MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-15, respectively. For comparison, pure MgFe2O4 without g-C3N4 nanosheets was prepared by the same method.

2.2. Sample Characterization

Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD, Cu-Kα, Bruker-AXSD8) (Bruker, Madison, WI, USA) was used to examine the purity and crystalline of the samples over a 2θ range of 10–90°. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, Quanta™250 FEG) (FEI, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEOL JEM-2100) (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) were used to analyze the morphologies and structures of the as-prepared samples. Thermal gravity and differential scanning calorimeter (TG–DSC) for the samples of g-C3N4 and MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-10 were recorded on a TA-SDT Q600 (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) over a temperature range of 30–800 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C min-1 under a flowing air atmosphere. The porous features of the samples were characterized by the N2 adsorption–desorption measurement (Quantachrome Autosorb-iQ2 sorption analyzer) (Quantachrome, Boynton Beach, FL, USA). Before obtained the measurement, the samples were degassed at 200 °C for more than 12 h. The specific surface area of the sample was estimated by using the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method and the pore size distribution was derived from the Density functional theory (DFT) method.

2.3. Gas Sensing Property Test

The gas-sensing property tests of the pure MgFe2O4 porous microspheres and MgFe2O4/g-C3N4 composites with different contents of g-C3N4 were investigated by using an intelligent gas sensing analysis system of CGS-4TPS (Beijing Elite Tech. Co., Ltd. Beijing, China). The fabrication and test process for the sensors is similar to our previously reported method. Figure 1 shows a simple device schematic diagram. The relative humidity is 25% and the temperature is 25 °C in the test chamber during the process of the gas-sensing testing. The response of the gas sensor is defined as follows: Response = Ra/Rg (Ra and Rg were the resistances of the sensor measured in air and in test gas, respectively).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Sample Characterization

Figure 2 shows the XRD patterns of g-C3N4, MgFe2O4 porous microspheres and MgFe2O4/g-C3N4 composites with different g-C3N4 contents. We found that the diffraction peaks of MgFe2O4 were consistent with the standard pattern of MgFe2O4 (JCPDS card No. 17-0464) [32]. For g-C3N4, a strong peak appears at around 27.71° that corresponds to (002) diffraction plane (JCPDS card No. 87-1526) [33], which is well-known for the melon network. Another peak at 12.81° corresponds to (100) ordering of tri-s-triazine units. However, there is no diffraction peak of g-C3N4 observed in the curves of MgFe2O4/g-C3N4 composites. This may be due to the relatively small content of g-C3N4 in the composite.
The morphologies and structures of the as-prepared samples were verified by FESEM and TEM. Figure 3a,d display the SEM and TEM images of pure g-C3N4. It can be observed that the pure g-C3N4 possesses a typical lamellar structure with many wrinkles. The SEM and TEM images of the MgFe2O4 microspheres are shown in Figure 3b,e. From the images, we can see that the prepared MgFe2O4 consists of very uniform microspheres with a hierarchical structure and a diameter of 200–250 nm. The TEM image shows that hundreds of nanoparticles form the building blocks of the MgFe2O4 microspheres, leading to the formation of a hierarchical structure and porous features. Figure 3c shows the SEM image of MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-10 composite. Compared with Figure 3b, we found that the originally dispersed MgFe2O4 microspheres were adhered to each other. From Figure 3f, we confirmed the existence of g-C3N4 and thus, we can conclude that the association phenomenon is due to the introduction of g-C3N4.
In order to determine the high temperature property of the g-C3N4 and MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-10, TG–DSC analysis was applied. As shown in Figure 4, there are three stages of weight loss in the MgFe2O4/g-C3N4 curve according to the peaks of DSC curve. The first stage in the temperature range of 100–300 °C is due to the desorption of adsorbed and trapped water and gas molecules. The reason of the second stage of weight loss between 300 °C and 450 °C is the removal of the primary solvent (ethylene glycol). The total lost weight of these two stages is 1.9%. The third stage corresponds to the temperature range of 475–635 °C in the TG curve of pure g-C3N4, which is due to the combustion of g-C3N4 in air (consistent with Figure 4 inset, the TG–DSC analysis of pure g-C3N4), and the weight loss of this stage is 5.1%. We proved that MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-10 composite could work normally without decomposing below the gas sensing test temperature of 475 °C.
N2-sorption measurements of the as-prepared MgFe2O4 porous microspheres and MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-10 composite were further performed to investigate their specific surface area and porous structure. As shown in Figure 5, the nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms of the two samples show a type IV adsorption-isotherm according to the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) classification, which is indicative of a mesoporous structure. The hysteresis loop of MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-10 samples belongs to H3-type, which demonstrates the presence of a laminated structure with narrow slits formed by MgFe2O4 microspheres and g-C3N4 sheet. Figure 5 (inset) depicts the pore size distribution curves of MgFe2O4 microspheres and MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-10 composite. It can be seen from Figure 5 that the pore diameter of MgFe2O4 and MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-10 composite is concentrated in the ranges of about 30–40 nm and 5–15 nm, respectively. This is in agreement with the TEM analysis results. The result illustrates that g-C3N4 fills the relatively large pores between the MgFe2O4 microspheres. The BET surface areas of MgFe2O4 and MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-10 samples were calculated to be 11.0 m2·g−1 and 16.8 m2·g−1, respectively.

3.2. Gas Sensing Property

It is well known that the working temperature greatly influences the gas-sensing performance of MOS-based sensor because the gas adsorption and desorption and surface reaction kinetics are all closely related with the working temperature. Figure 6 shows the response of MgFe2O4 porous microspheres and MgFe2O4/g-C3N4 composites-based sensors to 500 ppm acetone at different operating temperatures. It can be seen from Figure 6 that all response curves of sensors exhibit “increase–maximum–decrease” trends with increasing temperature. Comparing different curves, the results demonstrate that the introduction of g-C3N4 into MgFe2O4 can greatly enhance the sensor’s response to acetone, with the best g-C3N4 content in MgFe2O4/g-C3N4 composites being 10 wt %. The MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-10-based sensor exhibits the highest response value to acetone (which is 275 at 320 °C). Meanwhile, the highest response of the sensor based on pure MgFe2O4 porous microspheres is 1.9 at 380 °C. Compared with the MgFe2O4-based sensor, the maximum response of the sensor based on MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-10 is improved by about 145 times and the optimum temperature is lowered by 60 °C.
Figure 7a,b illustrate the response value curves of the pure MgFe2O4 porous microspheres and MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-10-based sensors to varied concentrations of acetone under the working temperature of 320 °C. With an increase in acetone concentration, more acetone molecules can adsorb to the materials’ surface, inducing a rise in the response value. According to the difference of acetone concentration range, two linear relationships were fitted respectively. The fitting linear relationships between the response value and acetone concentration are shown in Figure 7a,b, which provides a possibility for accurately monitoring acetone concentration. The responses of the sensor based on MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-10 towards 500, 1000 and 2000 ppm acetone were 271.1, 580 and 832, respectively. Meanwhile, the response values of MgFe2O4 porous microspheres based sensor were 1.8, 3.2 and 3.0, respectively. The results proved that the degree of gas sensor promotion is more obvious with an increase in acetone concentration. According to the IUPAC definition, the limit of detection (LoD) = 3(Noiserms/slope) [34]. The sensor noise was extracted from the root-mean-square (rms) deviation of the response fluctuation using 30 points at the baseline without target gas and the slope was calculated from the linear part in Figure 7. The limit of detection of sensor is determined to be 30 ppb.
Figure 8 depicts the response values of the MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-10-based sensor and the MgFe2O4 porous microspheres-based sensor to different gases with the same concentration (500 ppm) at 320 °C, including ethanol, methanal, methanol, propanediol and acetone. Obviously, it reveals that the sensor based on MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-10 has admirable selectivity to acetone than to other gases compared to the MgFe2O4 porous microspheres-based sensor at 320 °C. This selective test results indicates that the MgFe2O4/g-C3N4 composite could be a good candidate for the selective detection of acetone.
Response and recovery times are the important parameters of gas sensors, which are defined as the time required to reach 90% of the change of sensor resistance. The curve of MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-10-based sensor to 500 ppm acetone at a working temperature of 320 °C is shown in Figure 9. The response time and recovery time were calculated to be 49 s and 29 s, respectively. The result indicates that the gas sensing material of MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-10 possesses good response–recovery characteristics to acetone and could meet the requirements of practical applications.
In order to evaluate the repeatability and stability of the gas sensing properties of MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-10 material over time, the sensor responses to 500 ppm of acetone were measured during a period of 60 days and the sensor structure was prepared by using the same drop coating method. Figure 10 displays the long-term stability test results of MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-10-based sensor in 60 days. There is a small change within a certain range in the response of sensor from this graph, which further confirms that the MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-10-based sensor might have a practical application based on its good long-term stability.

3.3. Gas Sensing Mechanism

A modulation model based on the electronic depletion layer [35,36] can explain the gas sensing property. It is well known that MgFe2O4 and g-C3N4 are n-type semiconductors. The gas sensitivity of the sensor based on n-type semiconductor material essentially originates from the change of its electric resistance when the sensor is exposed to different gas atmospheres. Taking MgFe2O4 as an example, when the sensor is exposed to air, O2 will be adsorbed on the surface of MgFe2O4. The oxygen molecules act as electron acceptors from the conduction band and form surface absorbed oxygen anions, such as O2, O, and O2− (Equations (1)–(3)). This leads to the formation of a relatively thick electronic depletion layer, which results in an increase in the width of the potential barrier and results in the high resistance of the sensor (Ra). When the sensors are exposed to acetone, the former oxygen anions absorbed on the surface of material will react with the reducing gas (Equations (4)–(6)) and the trapped electrons by absorbed oxygen anions are released back to the conduction band. The resistance of sensors (Rg) can be thus decreased, which accompanies the decrease in the width of the potential barrier.
O 2 ( ads ) + e O 2 ( ads )
O 2 ( ads ) + e - 2 O ( ads )
O ( ads ) + e O ( ads ) 2
C H 3 C O C H 3 ( ads ) + 4 O 2 ( ads ) 3 C O 2 + 3 H 2 O + 4 e
C H 3 C O C H 3 ( ads ) + 8 O ( ads ) 3 C O 2 + 3 H 2 O + 8 e
C H 3 C O C H 3 ( ads ) + 8 O ( ads ) 2 3 C O 2 + 3 H 2 O + 16 e
In this work, we found that MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-baesd sensors exhibit better acetone sensing properties than pure MgFe2O4-based sensors. One of the possible reasons for the improved gas performance may be attributed to the heterojunction between the MgFe2O4 microspheres and g-C3N4 nanosheet. When the composite sensor was exposed to air, the process of electrons inflow from a component to another. The existence of heterojunction could lead to a higher potential barrier, which further results in an obvious increase in the sensor resistance (Ra). In contrast, due to the surface redox reaction between oxygen anions and acetone molecules, the potential barrier is decreased and the sensor resistance (Rg) is decreased correspondingly. Meanwhile, the larger surface contributes to more oxygen molecules and acetone molecules being adsorbed on the surface of sensor, which could further enhance the redox reaction between acetone molecules and absorbed oxygen anions.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we reported a high sensitivity acetone sensor based on MgFe2O4/g-C3N4 composite, which was synthesized via a one-step solvothermal method. By analyzing the given results of XRD, FESEM, TEM, TG–DSC and N2-sorption, we proved the existence of g-C3N4 nanosheet in the MgFe2O4/g-C3N4 composite. Due to the introduction of g-C3N4, the gas sensing property of MgFe2O4-based sensor is remarkably improved. Among these composites with different g-C3N4 contents, the MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-10-based sensor exhibited the eximious sensing performance to acetone, such as high sensitivity and selectivity, quick response and recovery as well as favorable stability. The as-prepared MgFe2O4/g-C3N4 composite could be a promising candidate for practical applications requiring highly sensitive acetone gas sensors.

Author Contributions

R.Z. performed the experiments and analyzed the data; Z.Z. analyzed the gas sensing mechanism; Y.W. and J.C. provided the concept and wrote the paper as the corresponding authors.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1704255, U1704146), Program for Science & Technology Innovation Talents in Universities of Henan Province (19HASTIT042), Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province of China (162300410113), the Research Foundation for Youth Scholars of Higher Education of Henan Province (2017GGJS053, 2016GGJS-040), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Universities of Henan Province (NSFRF170201, NSFRF1606), Program for Innovative Research Team in University of Ministry of Education of China (IRT-16R22), Program for Innovative Research Team of Henan Polytechnic University (T2018-2), Foundation for Distinguished Young Scientists of Henan Polytechnic University (J2016-2, J2017-3) for financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, K.; Pei, Z.; Wang, D. Organic solvent pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for biofuels and biochemicals: A review. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 199, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, X.-F.; Ma, W.; Jiang, F.; Cao, E.-S.; Sun, K.-M.; Cheng, L.; Song, X.-Z. Prussian blue analogue derived porous NiFe2O4 nanotubes for low-concentration acetone sensing at low working temperature. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 338, 504–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lourenço, C.; Turner, C. Breath analysis in disease diagnosis: Methodological considerations and applications. Metabolites 2014, 4, 465–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ueta, I.; Saito, Y.; Hosoe, M.; Okamoto, M.; Ohkita, H.; Shirai, S.; Tamura, H.; Jinno, K. Breath acetone analysis with miniaturized sample preparation device: In-needle preconcentration and subsequent determination by gas chromatography–mass spectroscopy. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2009, 877, 2551–2556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Li, Y.; Luo, N.; Sun, G.; Zhang, B.; Ma, G.; Jin, H.; Wang, Y.; Cao, J.; Zhang, Z. Facile synthesis of ZnFe2O4/α-Fe2O3 porous microrods with enhanced tea-sensing performance. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 737, 255–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, S.; Sun, G.; Li, Y.; Zhang, B.; Lin, L.; Wang, Y.; Cao, J.; Zhang, Z. Continuously improved gas-sensing performance of SnO2/Zn2SnO4 porous cubes by structure evolution and further NIO decoration. Sens. Actuators B 2018, 255, 2936–2943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ma, R.-J.; Li, G.-D.; Zou, X.; Gao, R.; Chen, H.; Zhao, X. Bimetallic Pt–Au nanocatalysts decorated In2O3 nests composed of ultrathin nanosheets for Type 1 diabetes diagnosis. Sens. Actuators B 2018, 270, 247–255. [Google Scholar]
  8. Sachdeva, S.; Agarwal, A.; Agarwal, R. Tungsten Oxide Thin Film Characterizations for Acetone Gas Detection. MAPAN 2018, 33, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, L.; Huang, L.; Lin, Y.; Sai, L.; Chang, Q.; Shi, W.; Chen, Q. Fully gravure-printed WO3/Pt-decorated rGO nanosheets composite film for detection of acetone. Sens. Actuators B 2018, 255, 1482–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Qin, L.; Xu, J.; Dong, X.; Pan, Q.; Cheng, Z.; Xiang, Q.; Li, F. The template-free synthesis of square-shaped SnO2 nanowires: The temperature effect and acetone gas sensors. Nanotechnology 2008, 19, 185705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Tang, L.; Li, Y.; Xu, K.; Hou, X.; Lv, Y. Sensitive and selective acetone sensor based on its cataluminescence from nano-La2O3 surface. Sens. Actuators B 2008, 132, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, R.; Zhou, T.; Wang, L.; Zhang, T. Metal−Organic Frameworks-Derived Hierarchical Co3O4 Structures as Efficient Sensing Materials for Acetone Detection. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 9765–9773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, S.-M.; Zhang, L.-X.; Zhu, M.-Y.; Ji, G.-J.; Zhao, L.-X.; Yin, J.; Bie, L.-J. Acetone sensing of ZnO nanosheets synthesized using room-temperature precipitation. Sens. Actuators B 2017, 249, 611–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cheng, Y.; He, Y.; Li, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, H.; Liu, L. Ultra-sensitive and selective acetone gas sensor with fast response at low temperature based on Cu-doped α-Fe2O3 porous nanotubes. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2018, 29, 11178–11186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sickafus, K.E.; Wills, J.M.; Grimes, N.W. Structure of spinel. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2010, 82, 3279–3292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, Y.-L.; Liu, Z.-M.; Yang, Y.; Yang, H.-F.; Shen, G.-L.; Yu, R.-Q. Simple synthesis of MgFe2O4 nanoparticles as gas sensing materials. Sens. Actuators B 2005, 107, 600–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hankare, P.P.; Jadhav, S.D.; Sankpal, U.B.; Patil, R.P.; Sasikala, R.; Mulla, I.S. Gas sensing properties of magnesium ferrite prepared by co-precipitation method. J. Alloys Compd. 2009, 488, 270–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Godbole, R.; Rao, P.; Bhagwat, S. Magnesium ferrite nanoparticles: A rapid gas sensor for alcohol. Mater. Res. Express 2017, 4, 025032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Patil, J.; Nadargi, D.; Mulla, I.S.; Suryavanshi, S.S. Spinel MgFe2O4 thick films: A colloidal approach for developing gas sensors. Mater. Lett. 2018, 213, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lu, J.; Jia, N.; Cheng, L.; Liang, K.; Huang, J.; Li, J. Rgo/CoTiO3 nanocomposite with enhanced gas sensing performance at low working temperature. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 739, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hassan, M.; Wang, Z.H.; Huang, W.R.; Li, M.Q.; Liu, J.W.; Chen, J.F. Ultrathin tungsten oxide nanowires/reduced graphene oxide composites for toluene sensing. Sensors 2017, 17, 2245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Li, Y.; Luo, N.; Sun, G.; Zhang, B.; Lin, L.; Jin, H.; Wang, Y.; Bala, H.; Cao, J.; Zhang, Z. In situ decoration of Zn2SnO4 nanoparticles on reduced graphene oxide for high performance ethanol sensor. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 6836–6842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mamba, G.; Mishra, A.K. Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) nanocomposites: A new and exciting generation of visible light driven photocatalysts for environmental pollution remediation. Appl. Catal. B 2016, 198, 347–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hu, Y.; Li, L.; Zhang, L.; Lv, Y. Dielectric barrier discharge plasma-assisted fabrication of g-C3N4-Mn3O4 composite for high-performance cataluminescence H2S gas sensor. Sens. Actuators B 2017, 239, 1177–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gong, Y.; Wang, Y.; Sun, G.; Jia, T.; Jia, L.; Zhang, F.; Lin, L.; Zhang, B.; Cao, J.; Zhang, Z. Carbon nitride decorated ball-flower like Co3O4 hybrid composite: Hydrothermal synthesis and ethanol gas sensing application. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, E132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Dai, H.; Zhang, S.; Xu, G.; Peng, Y.; Gong, L.; Li, X.; Li, Y.; Lin, Y.; Chen, G. Highly photoactive heterojunction based on g-C3N4 nanosheets decorated with dendritic zinc(ii) phthalocyanine through axial coordination and its ultrasensitive enzyme-free sensing of choline. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 58226–58230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shao, L.; Jiang, D.; Xiao, P.; Zhu, L.; Meng, S.; Chen, M. Enhancement of g-C3N4 nanosheets photocatalysis by synergistic interaction of ZnS microsphere and rGO inducing multistep charge transfer. Appl. Catal. B 2016, 198, 200–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cao, J.; Qin, C.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, B.; Gong, Y.; Wang, X.; Sun, G.; Bala, H.; Zhang, Z. Synthesis of g-C3N4 nanosheet modified SnO2 composites with improved performance for ethanol gas sensing. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 25504–25511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hu, J.; Zou, C.; Su, Y.; Li, M.; Yang, Z.; Ge, M.; Zhang, Y. One-step synthesis of 2D C3N4-tin oxide gas sensors for enhanced acetone vapor detection. Sens. Actuators B 2017, 253, 641–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cao, J.; Gong, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, H.; Sun, G.; Bala, H.; Zhang, Z. Cocoon-like ZnO decorated graphitic carbon nitride nanocomposite: Hydrothermal synthesis and ethanol gas sensing application. Mater. Lett. 2017, 198, 76–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cao, J.; Qin, C.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, B.; Gong, Y.; Zhang, H.; Sun, G.; Bala, H.; Zhang, Z. Calcination method synthesis of SnO2/g-C3N4 composites for a high-performance ethanol gas sensing application. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, E98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Xu, K.; Tong, Y.; Zhao, F. Preparation and comparison of catalytic performance for nano MgFe2O4, go-loaded MgFe2O4 and go-coated MgFe2O4 nanocomposites. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 18844–18850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ao, Z.M.; Peeters, F.M. High-capacity hydrogen storage in al-adsorbed graphene. Phys. Rev. B 2010, 81, 2498–2502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tshabalala, Z.; Shingange, K.; Dhonge, B.; Ntwaeaborwa, O.; Mhlongo, G.; Motaung, D. Fabrication of ultra-high sensitive and selective CH4, room temperature gas sensing of TiO2 nanorods: Detailed study on the annealing temperature. Sens. Actuators B 2017, 238, 402–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liao, L.; Lu, H.B.; Li, J.C.; He, H.; Wang, D.F.; And, D.J.F.; Liu, C.; Zhang, W.F. Size dependence of gas sensitivity of ZnO nanorods. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 1900–1903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ghosh, A.; Bhowmick, T.; Majumder, S. Multi-layered zinc oxide-graphene composite thin films for selective nitrogen dioxide sensing. J. Appl. Phys. 2018, 123, 084501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) The CGS-4TPS gas-sensing test system and (b) the gas sensor substrate.
Figure 1. (a) The CGS-4TPS gas-sensing test system and (b) the gas sensor substrate.
Sensors 18 02211 g001
Figure 2. XRD patterns of g-C3N4, MgFe2O4 porous microspheres and MgFe2O4/g-C3N4 composites with different g-C3N4 contents.
Figure 2. XRD patterns of g-C3N4, MgFe2O4 porous microspheres and MgFe2O4/g-C3N4 composites with different g-C3N4 contents.
Sensors 18 02211 g002
Figure 3. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of (a) g-C3N4; (b) MgFe2O4 porous microspheres and (c) MgFe2O4/g-C3N4 composite; as well as transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of (d) g-C3N4; (e) MgFe2O4 porous microspheres and (f) MgFe2O4/g-C3N4 composite.
Figure 3. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of (a) g-C3N4; (b) MgFe2O4 porous microspheres and (c) MgFe2O4/g-C3N4 composite; as well as transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of (d) g-C3N4; (e) MgFe2O4 porous microspheres and (f) MgFe2O4/g-C3N4 composite.
Sensors 18 02211 g003
Figure 4. Thermogravimetry–differential scanning calorimeter (TG–DSC) profiles of g-C3N4 and MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-10 composites.
Figure 4. Thermogravimetry–differential scanning calorimeter (TG–DSC) profiles of g-C3N4 and MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-10 composites.
Sensors 18 02211 g004
Figure 5. N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms and (inset) the corresponding pore size distribution curves of the MgFe2O4 porous microspheres and MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-10 composites.
Figure 5. N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms and (inset) the corresponding pore size distribution curves of the MgFe2O4 porous microspheres and MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-10 composites.
Sensors 18 02211 g005
Figure 6. Response values of the sensors based on pure MgFe2O4, MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-5, MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-10 and MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-15 composites to 500 ppm acetone as a function of operating temperature.
Figure 6. Response values of the sensors based on pure MgFe2O4, MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-5, MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-10 and MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-15 composites to 500 ppm acetone as a function of operating temperature.
Sensors 18 02211 g006
Figure 7. The response value of the sensors based on (a) MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-10 and (b) MgFe2O4 porous microspheres to the varied concentrations of acetone at the working temperature of 320 °C and their fitting linear.
Figure 7. The response value of the sensors based on (a) MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-10 and (b) MgFe2O4 porous microspheres to the varied concentrations of acetone at the working temperature of 320 °C and their fitting linear.
Sensors 18 02211 g007
Figure 8. Response values of the sensors based on MgFe2O4 and MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-10 to 500 ppm of different types of tested gas at working temperature of 320 °C.
Figure 8. Response values of the sensors based on MgFe2O4 and MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-10 to 500 ppm of different types of tested gas at working temperature of 320 °C.
Sensors 18 02211 g008
Figure 9. Response–recovery time curve of MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-10-based sensor to 500 ppm acetone at working temperature of 320 °C.
Figure 9. Response–recovery time curve of MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-10-based sensor to 500 ppm acetone at working temperature of 320 °C.
Sensors 18 02211 g009
Figure 10. Stability measurement of the sensor based on MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-10-10 to 500 ppm acetone at 320 °C.
Figure 10. Stability measurement of the sensor based on MgFe2O4/g-C3N4-10-10 to 500 ppm acetone at 320 °C.
Sensors 18 02211 g010

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, R.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Cao, J. Highly Sensitive Acetone Gas Sensor Based on g-C3N4 Decorated MgFe2O4 Porous Microspheres Composites. Sensors 2018, 18, 2211. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18072211

AMA Style

Zhang R, Wang Y, Zhang Z, Cao J. Highly Sensitive Acetone Gas Sensor Based on g-C3N4 Decorated MgFe2O4 Porous Microspheres Composites. Sensors. 2018; 18(7):2211. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18072211

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Run, Yan Wang, Zhanying Zhang, and Jianliang Cao. 2018. "Highly Sensitive Acetone Gas Sensor Based on g-C3N4 Decorated MgFe2O4 Porous Microspheres Composites" Sensors 18, no. 7: 2211. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18072211

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop