Next Article in Journal
Efficient Matrix-Based Channel Hopping Schemes for Blind Rendezvous in Distributed Cognitive Radio Networks
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of the Transition Points Mismatch on Quanta Image Sensors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fiber-Optic Magnetic Field Sensing Based on Microfiber Knot Resonator with Magnetic Fluid Cladding

1
College of Science, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
2
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Modern Optical System, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2018, 18(12), 4358; https://doi.org/10.3390/s18124358
Submission received: 6 November 2018 / Revised: 6 December 2018 / Accepted: 7 December 2018 / Published: 10 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Sensors)

Abstract

:
A kind of all-fiber magnetic field sensing structure is proposed and demonstrated here. The sensing element includes a microfiber knot resonator (MKR) cladded with magnetic fluid (MF). The low-index MgF2 slab is adopted as the substrate. The sensitivity increases with the decrease of the MKR ring diameter. The achieved maximum magnetic field sensitivity is 277 pm/mT. The results of this work have the potential to promote the development of magnetically controllable optical devices and the design of ultra-compact cost-effective magnetic field sensors.

1. Introduction

Recently, the micro-nano fiber (MNF) ring resonator has been intensively investigated for its ability to measure various physical parameters, such as magnetic field, temperature, bio-chemical solution, current, salinity, force, electric field, and refractive index (RI) [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. The advantages of the structure lie in its small size, anti-interference, quick response, high resolution, low detection limit and high sensitivity [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. Among various MNF ring resonators, the microfiber loop resonator (MLR), microfiber knot resonator (MKR) and microfiber coil resonator (MCR) attract particular interest [17]. Compared with the MLR and MCR, MKR is an outstanding MNF ring resonator due to its stable performance and adjustable free spectral range (FSR). Li et al. have demonstrated the all-fiber magnetic field sensor based on MKR and magnetic fluid (MF) with a sensitivity of 3 pm/mT [4]. Amili et al. have designed a magnetically controllable silicon microring with ferrofluid cladding and obtained a magnetic field sensitivity of 1.68 pm/Oe [18].
In this work, a fiber-optic magnetic field sensor based on MKR with MF cladding is proposed and experimentally demonstrated. The MgF2 slab with low RI is used as the substrate to support the MKR, which will result in the large evanescent field of the MKR accessing the MF cladding. Therefore, the transmission spectrum of the MKR is highly sensitive to the external RI. The sensitivity is greatly improved. In addition, the proposed MKR sensor has the potential to be utilized in some harsh conditions, such as in narrow gaps and remote monitoring.

2. Fabrication and Sensing Principle

To fabricate the MKR, the single-mode fiber is tapered into microfiber with the flame-heated taper-drawing technique [19]. The diameter of the as-fabricated microfiber is 4 μm. Then, the microfiber is knotted to obtain the MKR with desired ring diameter. The MKR is placed on the low-index MgF2 slab and fixed with UV glue at the non-tapered area. Finally, the MKR with MgF2 substrate is inserted into a glass cell filled with MF. The employed MF is a water-based MF with a density of 1.06 g/cm3 at 25 °C, which is provided by Beijing Sunrise Ferrofluid Technological Co., Ltd., Beijing, China. The diameter of the magnetic nanoparticles is around 10 nm. The RI of MgF2 slab is ~1.37, which is much smaller than that of microfiber. This will avoid the leaking of MKR evanescent field into the substrate. Therefore, most of the MKR evanescent field can penetrate into the surrounding medium (MF). Thus, the sensitivity of the structure will be improved.
The optical micrographs of the as-fabricated MKRs are shown in Figure 1. The ring diameters D are 155, 289, 328 and 594 μm, respectively. There is a slight deviation from an absolutely perfect circle for the as-fabricated structures, especially for those with large diameters.
For the MKR, the resonance wavelength is expressed as [20]
λ r e s = 2 π n e f f L m
where n e f f and L are the effective RI and circumference of the knot, respectively. m is the resonance order. It is obvious from Equation (1) that the resonance wavelength λ r e s changes with n e f f . As the RI of MF increases with the magnetic field (usually around 0.0001 RIU/Oe) [21,22,23,24], the effective RI of knot will also change with the magnetic field. Therefore, the resonance wavelength will shift with the magnetic field. Magnetic field sensing is realized by monitoring the resonance wavelength shift.

3. Experiments and Discussion

The experimental setup for investigating the sensing properties is shown in Figure 2. Light from the highly stabilized laser source (HSLS) is launched into the sensing structure, and the output light is detected and analyzed by an optical spectrum analyzer (OSA, Yokogawa AQ6370C, Tokyo, Japan). The MKR structure under test is placed between two coils in a Helmholtz configuration (HC). The current-voltage source (CVS) provides electric current which flows through the coils, generating an adjustable uniform magnetic field. The magnetic field direction is parallel to the MKR plane. During our experiments, the ambient temperature is kept constant.
Figure 3 shows the transmission spectra of the MKRs at various applied magnetic fields. For all the MKRs, the resonance dip red-shifts with the external magnetic field. Theoretically, the shift for m-th order resonance wavelength can be derived from Equation (1),
Δ λ r e s = n e f f n M F n M F H Δ H n e f f λ r e s
where Δ H is the change of magnetic field intensity. As n e f f increases with n M F , n e f f n M F > 0 . The relationship between RI of MF and magnetic field intensity meets the Langevin function [25], so n M F H > 0 . As n e f f increases with n M F , n e f f n M F > 0 . Consequently, the resonance spectrum red-shifts with the magnetic field. In addition, the extinction ratio of the transmission spectra increases with the magnetic field for a certain MKR structure, which may be assigned to the power coupling change of the structures.
The magnetic-field-dependent wavelength shift is further plotted in Figure 4. Figure 4 reveals that the magnetic field sensitivities are about 277, 97, 73 and 30 pm/mT, respectively. Figure 5 explicitly displays the magnetic field sensitivity as a function of the MKR ring diameter. As the diameter of MKR ring decreases, the sensitivity increases monotonously. The experimental data slightly deviate from linearity, which may contribute to the non-circular structures.
For the microfiber with fixed diameter, the evanescent field increases with the decrease of bending radius. Therefore, the evanescent field of MKR enhances with the decrease of the MKR ring diameter. This will lead to higher sensitivity for an MKR with smaller diameter.
Table 1 compares the sensitivity of various fiber-optic magnetic field sensing structures, which shows that the achieved sensitivity of our structure is relatively high. The sensitivity of our work is around 16 times higher than that of the silicon microring [18] and is the same order of magnitude as that of a microstructured polymer optical fiber structure [26]. We would like to further point out that the RI of MF only depends on the absolute value of the magnetic field. Therefore, the proposed sensor cannot determine the sign of the magnetic field. Besides this, the polarization of incident light and relative orientation between the magnetic field and MKR plane will affect the sensing properties [22,27].
Considering the 0.02 nm wavelength resolution of traditionally commercial OSA, the magnetic field sensing accuracy can reach 0.07 mT, which can be further enhanced by using a demodulator with higher resolution.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, the MKR combined MF is proposed for magnetic field sensing. The resonance wavelength varies approximately linearly with the applied magnetic field. The obtained magnetic field sensitivity is 277 pm/mT for the MKR with a ring diameter of 155 nm. As the diameter of MKR decreases, the sensitivity of the structure increases correspondingly. The sensor designed in this paper can adjust the Q value and sensitivity by micro-operation. It is also easy to fabricate and integrate with traditional optical fibers, and it can be applied to a variety of microphotonic devices.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.P.; Formal analysis, Y.L., S.P. and Y.Z.; Investigation, Y.L.; Project administration, S.P.; Resources, S.P.; Supervision, S.P.; Validation, Y.L. and T.Y.; Writing—original draft, Y.L. and S.P.; Writing—review & editing, Y.L., S.P., Y.Z. and T.Y.

Funding

This research is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61675132), Shanghai “Shuguang Program” (Grant No. 16SG40), Shanghai Talent Development Fund (Grant No. 201529), and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Specialty Fiber Optics and Optical Access Networks (Grant No. SKLSFO2014-05).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, P.; Gu, F.X.; Zhang, L.; Tong, L. Polymer microfiber rings for high sensitivity optical humidity sensing. Appl. Opt. 2011, 50, G7–G10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Liu, Q.; Chen, Y. PMMA-rod-assisted temperature sensor based on a two-turn thick microfiber resonator. J. Mod. Opt. 2016, 63, 159–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lim, K.S.; Harun, S.W.; Damanhuri, S.S.A.; Jasim, A.A.; Tio, C.K.; Ahmad, H. Current sensor based on microfiber knot resonator. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2011, 167, 60–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, X.; Ding, H. All-fiber magnetic-field sensor based on microfiber knot resonator and magnetic fluid. Opt. Lett. 2012, 37, 5187–5189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhou, S.; Dong, J.; He, D.; Wang, Y.; Qiu, W.; Yu, J.; Guan, H.; Zhu, W.; Zhong, Y.; Luo, Y.; et al. Interlinked add-drop filter with amplitude modulation routing a fiber-optic microring to a lithium niobate microwaveguide. Opt. Lett. 2017, 42, 1496–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shahal, S.; Klevin, A.; Masri, G.; Fridman, M. Fused fiber micro-knots. Appl. Opt. 2016, 55, 4538–4541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Liao, Y.; Wang, X.; Yang, H.; Wang, S.; Wang, J. Resonant mode characteristics of microfiber knot-type ring resonator and its salinity sensing experiment. IEEE Photonics J. 2015, 7, 6802308. [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhu, H.; White, I.M.; Suter, J.D.; Dale, P.S.; Fan, X. Analysis of biomolecule detection with optofluidic ring resonator sensors. Opt. Express 2007, 15, 9139–9146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Lorenzi, R.; Jung, Y.; Brambilla, G. In-line absorption sensor based on coiled optical microfiber. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 98, 173504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Ding, M.; Wang, P.; Brambilla, G. A microfiber coupler tip thermometer. Opt. Express 2012, 20, 5402–5408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wu, Y.; Zhang, T.; Rao, Y.; Gong, Y. Miniature interferometric humidity sensors based on silica/polymer microfiber knot resonators. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2011, 155, 258–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xiao, L.; Birks, T.A. High finesse microfiber knot resonators made from double-ended tapered fibers. Opt. Lett. 2011, 36, 1098–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Jin, W.; Wang, C.; Xuan, H.; Jin, W. Tunable comb filters and refractive index sensors based on fibre loop mirror with inline high birefringence microfiber. Opt. Lett. 2013, 38, 4277–4280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jiang, X.; Tong, L.; Vienne, G.; Guo, X.; Tsao, A.; Yang, Q.; Yang, D. Demonstration of optical microfiber knot resonators. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 88, 223501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jiang, X.; Yang, Q.; Vienne, G.; Li, Y.; Tong, L.; Zhang, J.; Hu, L. Demonstration of microfiber knot laser. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 89, 143513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yang, H.; Wang, S.; Wang, X.; Liao, Y.; Wang, J. Temperature sensing in seawater based on microfiber knot resonator. Sensors 2014, 14, 18515–18525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Chen, G.; Ding, M.; Newson, T.; Brambilla, G. A review of microfiber and nanofiber based optical sensors. Open Opt. J. 2013, 7, 32–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Amili, A.E.; Souza, M.C.M.M.; Vallini, F.; Frateschi, N.C.; Fainman, Y. Magnetically controllable silicon microring with ferrofluid cladding. Opt. Lett. 2016, 41, 5576–5579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tong, L.; Gattass, R.R.; Ashcom, J.B.; He, S.; Lou, J.; Shen, M.; Maxwell, I.; Mazur, E. Subwavelength-diameter silica wires for low-loss optical wave guiding. Nature 2003, 18, 816–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, X.; Ding, H. A stable evanescent field-based microfiber knot resonator refractive index sensor. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2014, 26, 1625–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hong, C.; Yang, S.; Horng, H.; Yang, H. Control parameters for the tunable refractive index of magnetic fluid films. J. Appl. Phys. 2003, 94, 3849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Violakis, G.; Korakas, N.; Pissadakis, S. Differential loss magnetic field sensor using a ferrofluid encapsulated D-shaped optical fiber. Opt. Lett. 2018, 43, 142–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Liu, T.; Chen, X.; Di, Z.; Zhang, J.; Li, X. Tunable magneto-optical wavelength filter of long-period fiber grating with magnetic fluids. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 91, 121116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dong, S.; Pu, S.; Huang, J. Magnetic field sensing based on magneto-volume variation of magnetic fluids investigated by air-gap Fabry-Pérot fiber interferometers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 103, 111907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pu, S.; Wang, H.; Wang, N.; Zeng, X. Extremely large bandwidth and ultralow-dispersion slow light in photonic crystal waveguides with magnetically controllability. Appl. Phys. B 2013, 112, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Candiani, A.; Argyros, A.; Leon-Saval, S.; Lwin, R.; Selleri, S.; Pissadakis, S. A loss-based, magnetic field sensor implemented in a ferrofluid infiltrated microstructured polymer optical fiber. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 104, 111106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jiang, Z.; Dong, J.; Hu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Luo, Y.; Zhu, W.; Qiu, W.; Lu, H.; Guan, H.; et al. High-sensitivity vector magnetic field sensor based on side-polished fiber plasmon and ferrofluid. Opt. Lett. 2018, 43, 4743–4746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dong, S.; Pu, S.; Wang, H. Magnetic field sensing based on magnetic-fluid-clad fiber-optic structure with taper-like and lateral-offset fusion splicing. Opt. Express 2014, 22, 19108–19116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Costa, G.K.B.; Gouvêa, P.M.P.; Soares, L.M.B.; Pereira, J.M.B.; Favero, F.; Braga, A.M.B.; Palffy-Muhoray, P.; Bruno, A.C.; Carvalho, I.C.S. In-fiber Fabry-Perot interferometer for strain and magnetic field sensing. Opt. Express 2016, 24, 14690–14696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Deng, M.; Huang, C.; Liu, D.; Jin, W.; Zhu, T. All fiber magnetic field sensor with Ferrofluid-filled tapered microstructured optical fiber interferometer. Opt. Express 2015, 23, 20668–20674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Optical micrographs of the as-fabricated microfiber knot resonators (MKRs) with ring diameters of 155 μm (a), 289 μm (b), 328 μm (c), and 594 μm (d).
Figure 1. Optical micrographs of the as-fabricated microfiber knot resonators (MKRs) with ring diameters of 155 μm (a), 289 μm (b), 328 μm (c), and 594 μm (d).
Sensors 18 04358 g001
Figure 2. Schematic of the experimental setup for investigating the sensing properties.
Figure 2. Schematic of the experimental setup for investigating the sensing properties.
Sensors 18 04358 g002
Figure 3. Transmission spectra of the MKRs at various magnetic fields. The ring diameters of the MKRs are 155 μm (a), 289 μm (b), 328 μm (c), and 594 μm (d).
Figure 3. Transmission spectra of the MKRs at various magnetic fields. The ring diameters of the MKRs are 155 μm (a), 289 μm (b), 328 μm (c), and 594 μm (d).
Sensors 18 04358 g003
Figure 4. Wavelength shift as a function of magnetic field for the MKR sensors. The ring diameters of the MKRs are 155 μm (a), 289 μm (b), 328μm (c), and 594 μm (d).
Figure 4. Wavelength shift as a function of magnetic field for the MKR sensors. The ring diameters of the MKRs are 155 μm (a), 289 μm (b), 328μm (c), and 594 μm (d).
Sensors 18 04358 g004
Figure 5. Magnetic field sensitivity of the MKR sensors as a function of the MKR ring diameter.
Figure 5. Magnetic field sensitivity of the MKR sensors as a function of the MKR ring diameter.
Sensors 18 04358 g005
Table 1. Sensitivity comparison of various magnetic field sensing structures.
Table 1. Sensitivity comparison of various magnetic field sensing structures.
NumberStructureSensitivityReference
1MKR (silica gel)3 pm/mT (0.3 pm/Gs)[4]
2Silicon microring1.68 pm/Oe[18]
3Taper-like and lateral-offset fusion splicing26 pm/Oe[28]
4Fabry–Perot interferometer44 pm/mT (4.4 pm/Gs)[29]
5Taper microstructured fiber117.9 pm/mT (11.79 pm/Gs)[30]
6MKR (MgF2 substrate)277 pm/mT (27.7 pm/Gs)This work

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Y.; Pu, S.; Zhao, Y.; Yao, T. Fiber-Optic Magnetic Field Sensing Based on Microfiber Knot Resonator with Magnetic Fluid Cladding. Sensors 2018, 18, 4358. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18124358

AMA Style

Li Y, Pu S, Zhao Y, Yao T. Fiber-Optic Magnetic Field Sensing Based on Microfiber Knot Resonator with Magnetic Fluid Cladding. Sensors. 2018; 18(12):4358. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18124358

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Yuqi, Shengli Pu, Yongliang Zhao, and Tianjun Yao. 2018. "Fiber-Optic Magnetic Field Sensing Based on Microfiber Knot Resonator with Magnetic Fluid Cladding" Sensors 18, no. 12: 4358. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18124358

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop