Investigating the Utility of Oblique Tree-Based Ensembles for the Classification of Hyperspectral Data
AbstractEnsemble classifiers are being widely used for the classification of spectroscopic data. In this regard, the random forest (RF) ensemble has been successfully applied in an array of applications, and has proven to be robust in handling high dimensional data. More recently, several variants of the traditional RF algorithm including rotation forest (rotF) and oblique random forest (oRF) have been applied to classifying high dimensional data. In this study we compare the traditional RF, rotF, and oRF (using three different splitting rules, i.e., ridge regression, partial least squares, and support vector machine) for the classification of healthy and infected Pinus radiata seedlings using high dimensional spectroscopic data. We further test the robustness of these five ensemble classifiers to reduced spectral resolution by spectral resampling (binning) of the original spectral bands. The results showed that the three oblique random forest ensembles outperformed both the traditional RF and rotF ensembles. Additionally, the rotF ensemble proved to be the least robust of the five ensembles tested. Spectral resampling of the original bands provided mixed results. Nevertheless, the results demonstrate that using spectral resampled bands is a promising approach to classifying asymptomatic stress in Pinus radiata seedlings. View Full-Text
Share & Cite This Article
Poona, N.; van Niekerk, A.; Ismail, R. Investigating the Utility of Oblique Tree-Based Ensembles for the Classification of Hyperspectral Data. Sensors 2016, 16, 1918.
Poona N, van Niekerk A, Ismail R. Investigating the Utility of Oblique Tree-Based Ensembles for the Classification of Hyperspectral Data. Sensors. 2016; 16(11):1918.Chicago/Turabian Style
Poona, Nitesh; van Niekerk, Adriaan; Ismail, Riyad. 2016. "Investigating the Utility of Oblique Tree-Based Ensembles for the Classification of Hyperspectral Data." Sensors 16, no. 11: 1918.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.