Next Article in Journal
An Optical Fiber Bundle Sensor for Tip Clearance and Tip Timing Measurements in a Turbine Rig
Next Article in Special Issue
Two Phase Non-Rigid Multi-Modal Image Registration Using Weber Local Descriptor-Based Similarity Metrics and Normalized Mutual Information
Previous Article in Journal
TREFEX: Trend Estimation and Change Detection in the Response of MOX Gas Sensors
Previous Article in Special Issue
In vivo X-Ray Computed Tomographic Imaging of Soft Tissue with Native, Intravenous, or Oral Contrast
Sensors 2013, 13(6), 7345-7384; doi:10.3390/s130607345
Review

Optoacoustic Imaging and Tomography: Reconstruction Approaches and Outstanding Challenges in Image Performance and Quantification

 and *
Received: 21 March 2013; in revised form: 29 May 2013 / Accepted: 31 May 2013 / Published: 4 June 2013
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Medical & Biological Imaging)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1212 KB, uploaded 21 June 2014]   |   Browse Figures
Abstract: This paper comprehensively reviews the emerging topic of optoacoustic imaging from the image reconstruction and quantification perspective. Optoacoustic imaging combines highly attractive features, including rich contrast and high versatility in sensing diverse biological targets, excellent spatial resolution not compromised by light scattering, and relatively low cost of implementation. Yet, living objects present a complex target for optoacoustic imaging due to the presence of a highly heterogeneous tissue background in the form of strong spatial variations of scattering and absorption. Extracting quantified information on the actual distribution of tissue chromophores and other biomarkers constitutes therefore a challenging problem. Image quantification is further compromised by some frequently-used approximated inversion formulae. In this review, the currently available optoacoustic image reconstruction and quantification approaches are assessed, including back-projection and model-based inversion algorithms, sparse signal representation, wavelet-based approaches, methods for reduction of acoustic artifacts as well as multi-spectral methods for visualization of tissue bio-markers. Applicability of the different methodologies is further analyzed in the context of real-life performance in small animal and clinical in-vivo imaging scenarios.
Keywords: optoacoustic imaging; photoacoustic tomography; image reconstruction; quantification; multispectral optoacoustic tomography; inverse problem; light transport; spectroscopic imaging optoacoustic imaging; photoacoustic tomography; image reconstruction; quantification; multispectral optoacoustic tomography; inverse problem; light transport; spectroscopic imaging
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Lutzweiler, C.; Razansky, D. Optoacoustic Imaging and Tomography: Reconstruction Approaches and Outstanding Challenges in Image Performance and Quantification. Sensors 2013, 13, 7345-7384.

AMA Style

Lutzweiler C, Razansky D. Optoacoustic Imaging and Tomography: Reconstruction Approaches and Outstanding Challenges in Image Performance and Quantification. Sensors. 2013; 13(6):7345-7384.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lutzweiler, Christian; Razansky, Daniel. 2013. "Optoacoustic Imaging and Tomography: Reconstruction Approaches and Outstanding Challenges in Image Performance and Quantification." Sensors 13, no. 6: 7345-7384.


Sensors EISSN 1424-8220 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert