Next Article in Journal
Illumination of the Spatial Order of Intracellular pH by Genetically Encoded pH-Sensitive Sensors
Next Article in Special Issue
Hyperpolarized NMR Probes for Biological Assays
Previous Article in Journal
Hierarchical Recognition Scheme for Human Facial Expression Recognition Systems
Previous Article in Special Issue
Software Defined Radio (SDR) and Direct Digital Synthesizer (DDS) for NMR/MRI Instruments at Low-Field
Sensors 2013, 13(12), 16714-16735; doi:10.3390/s131216714
Article

Calibrationless Parallel Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Joint Sparsity Model

1,* , 2
 and 1
Received: 10 October 2013; in revised form: 22 November 2013 / Accepted: 25 November 2013 / Published: 5 December 2013
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Magnetic Resonance Sensors)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [805 KB, uploaded 21 June 2014]   |   Browse Figures
Abstract: State-of-the-art parallel MRI techniques either explicitly or implicitly require certain parameters to be estimated, e.g., the sensitivity map for SENSE, SMASH and interpolation weights for GRAPPA, SPIRiT. Thus all these techniques are sensitive to the calibration (parameter estimation) stage. In this work, we have proposed a parallel MRI technique that does not require any calibration but yields reconstruction results that are at par with (or even better than) state-of-the-art methods in parallel MRI. Our proposed method required solving non-convex analysis and synthesis prior joint-sparsity problems. This work also derives the algorithms for solving them. Experimental validation was carried out on two datasets—eight channel brain and eight channel Shepp-Logan phantom. Two sampling methods were used—Variable Density Random sampling and non-Cartesian Radial sampling. For the brain data, acceleration factor of 4 was used and for the other an acceleration factor of 6 was used. The reconstruction results were quantitatively evaluated based on the Normalised Mean Squared Error between the reconstructed image and the originals. The qualitative evaluation was based on the actual reconstructed images. We compared our work with four state-of-the-art parallel imaging techniques; two calibrated methods—CS SENSE and l1SPIRiT and two calibration free techniques—Distributed CS and SAKE. Our method yields better reconstruction results than all of them.
Keywords: compressed sensing; magnetic resonance imaging; optimization compressed sensing; magnetic resonance imaging; optimization
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Majumdar, A.; Chaudhury, K.N.; Ward, R. Calibrationless Parallel Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Joint Sparsity Model. Sensors 2013, 13, 16714-16735.

AMA Style

Majumdar A, Chaudhury KN, Ward R. Calibrationless Parallel Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Joint Sparsity Model. Sensors. 2013; 13(12):16714-16735.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Majumdar, Angshul; Chaudhury, Kunal N.; Ward, Rabab. 2013. "Calibrationless Parallel Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Joint Sparsity Model." Sensors 13, no. 12: 16714-16735.


Sensors EISSN 1424-8220 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert