Next Article in Journal
Novel Feature Modelling the Prediction and Detection of sEMG Muscle Fatigue towards an Automated Wearable System
Next Article in Special Issue
Detecting Nano-Scale Vibrations in Rotating Devices by Using Advanced Computational Methods
Previous Article in Journal
Real Time Speed Estimation of Moving Vehicles from Side View Images from an Uncalibrated Video Camera
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Multi-D-Shaped Optical Fiber for Refractive Index Sensing
Sensors 2010, 10(5), 4825-4837; doi:10.3390/s100504825
Article

GPCA vs. PCA in Recognition and 3-D Localization of Ultrasound Reflectors

* ,
,
,
 and
Received: 25 February 2010; in revised form: 20 April 2010 / Accepted: 7 May 2010 / Published: 11 May 2010
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [341 KB, uploaded 21 June 2014]   |   Browse Figures
Abstract: In this paper, a new method of classification and localization of reflectors, using the time-of-flight (TOF) data obtained from ultrasonic transducers, is presented. The method of classification and localization is based on Generalized Principal Component Analysis (GPCA) applied to the TOF values obtained from a sensor that contains four ultrasound emitters and 16 receivers. Since PCA works with vectorized representations of TOF, it does not take into account the spatial locality of receivers. The GPCA works with two-dimensional representations of TOF, taking into account information on the spatial position of the receivers. This report includes a detailed description of the method of classification and localization and the results of achieved tests with three types of reflectors in 3-D environments: planes, edges, and corners. The results in terms of processing time, classification and localization were very satisfactory for the reflectors located in the range of 50–350 cm.
Keywords: principal component analysis (PCA); generalized principal component analysis (GPCA); reflector classification; times-of-flight (TOFs); ultrasonic sensors principal component analysis (PCA); generalized principal component analysis (GPCA); reflector classification; times-of-flight (TOFs); ultrasonic sensors
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Luna, C.A.; Jiménez, J.A.; Pizarro, D.; Losada, C.; Rodriguez, J.M. GPCA vs. PCA in Recognition and 3-D Localization of Ultrasound Reflectors. Sensors 2010, 10, 4825-4837.

AMA Style

Luna CA, Jiménez JA, Pizarro D, Losada C, Rodriguez JM. GPCA vs. PCA in Recognition and 3-D Localization of Ultrasound Reflectors. Sensors. 2010; 10(5):4825-4837.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Luna, Carlos A.; Jiménez, José A.; Pizarro, Daniel; Losada, Cristina; Rodriguez, José M. 2010. "GPCA vs. PCA in Recognition and 3-D Localization of Ultrasound Reflectors." Sensors 10, no. 5: 4825-4837.


Sensors EISSN 1424-8220 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert