Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Human Papilloma Viruses, Matrix Metallo-Proteinases and HIV Protease Inhibitors on the Onset and Progression of Uterine Cervix Epithelial Tumors: A Review of Preclinical and Clinical Studies
Previous Article in Journal
Glucosamine-Induced Autophagy through AMPK–mTOR Pathway Attenuates Lipofuscin-Like Autofluorescence in Human Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells In Vitro
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 19
Issue 5
10.3390/ijms19051417
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Turnover of Glycerolipid Metabolite Pool and Seed Viability

by
Xiao-Long Hu
1,2,†,
Xiao-Mei Yu
1,†,
Hong-Ying Chen
1,3 and
Wei-Qi Li
1,3,*
1
Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China
2
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China
3
The Germplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(5), 1417; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19051417
Submission received: 14 April 2018 / Revised: 30 April 2018 / Accepted: 2 May 2018 / Published: 9 May 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Hydration–dehydration cycles can frequently cause stress to seeds, but can also be used to improve germination. However, the molecular basis of the stress caused is poorly understood. Herein, we examine the effects of hydration–dehydration cycles on seed viability and profile the membrane glycerolipid molecular species. We find that seed viability was not affected during the first two cycles, but significantly decreased as further cycles were applied, until all viability was lost. The abundances of seven glycerolipid classes increased and decreased through hydration and dehydration, respectively, but the phosphatidic acid and diacylglycerol abundances changed in the opposite sense, while total glycerolipid contents remained constant. This suggests that during hydration–dehydration cycles, turnover of glycerolipid metabolite pools take place, while no significant lipid synthesis or degradation is involved. As further hydration–dehydration cycles occurred, lipid unsaturation increased, plastidic lipids decreased, and phosphatidylserine acyl chains lengthened. The latter two could be lethal for seeds. Our findings reveal a novel model of membrane lipid changes, and provide new insights into the responses of seeds to hydration–dehydration cycles.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Seeds are not able to germinate without sufficient water under natural conditions [1,2]. However, sporadic rainfall and evaporation can cause seeds to experience hydration–dehydration cycles before germination [3,4]. Also, dew deposition at night and evaporation in the day cause diurnal hydration–dehydration cycles [5]. The seeds of desert plants are particularly likely to experience hydration–dehydration cycles, being frequently subjected to wetting–drying periods on the desert surface [6,7]. Single hydration–dehydration cycles are used artificially to improve seed germination in agricultural and forestry systems. Priming (semi-hydrating dry seeds and then dehydrating them) enables rapid and uniform germination [8,9,10], and can prevent imbibitional chilling injuries [11]. Survival or resistance to the effects of multiple hydration–dehydration cycles is an important trait in seeds both in the natural environment and in agricultural systems.
Seed hydration–dehydration cycles (differing in duration and number) have been investigated intensively at the physiological level. Approaches include soaking–drying, moisture equilibration–drying, and moist sand conditioning–drying [12]. Hydration–dehydration cycles can maintain or enhance seed vigor and viability [6,13,14,15], improve seed storability, and improve resistance to some stressors (e.g., heat shock and salt stress) [12,16,17,18,19]. In addition, wetting and drying cycles can also break seed dormancy [20]. However, hydration–dehydration cycles also cause membrane leakage and oxidative stress [21]. Long-term hydration or large numbers of cycles do not benefit and can even damage seed quality [15,22,23]. Thus, distinct hydration–dehydration treatments can positively or negatively affect germination.
Plant membrane lipids are sensitive to changes in water content [24,25,26,27,28,29]. The components of plant membranes are mainly glycerolipids (see Figure 1 and Table S1), phosphatidic acid (PA), phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), phosphatidylglycerol (PG), phosphatidylinositol (PI), phosphatidylserine (PS), digalactosyldiacylglycerol (DGDG), and monogalactosyldiacylglycerol (MGDG). In the glycerolipid synthesis pathway, membrane lipids are derived from the intermediate PA and diacylglycerol (DAG) at the plastid and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (Figure 1). Environmental stress can cause the turnover of membrane lipids between each other to adjust local membrane features. For example, PA can be produced from PC and PE under freezing, mechanical wounding or drought conditions [28,30,31] because PA is cone-shape and fits the hexagonal II phase of membranes that have shrunk due to water deficit [11,32,33]. Therefore, PA content could be very high in mature dry seeds [11,34] and is known to decrease after seed imbibition [11]. A cellular water deficit commonly causes the degree of unsaturation of membrane lipids to increase [29,35]. A high degree of unsaturation increases membrane fluidity and can, therefore, maintain the physiological efficiency of a membrane [35,36]. Stress can also cause the acyl chain length (ACL) of PS to increase. The existence of long ACLs is speculated to be a signal of plant death [37]. However, it is not yet clear how membrane lipids in seeds respond to hydration–dehydration cycles.
We subjected seeds to hydration–dehydration cycles and profiled the molecular species in membrane lipids of Arabidopsis thaliana seeds using electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry, with the aim of determining how the seed membranes respond to continual changes in water content [31,38,39]. The amounts of all the membrane lipids, except PA, increased dramatically when the seeds were hydrated, and decreased when the seeds were dehydrated. The amount of PA present changed in the opposite direction, and in the same way as DAG. The total amount of glycerolipids present remained constant, but the proportion of PA plus DAG over other glycerolipids changed during the hydration–dehydration cycles. The degree of unsaturation of the membrane lipids changed and the ACL of PS increased as the number of hydration–dehydration cycles increased. Changes in lyso-phospholipids were also examined. We found novel metabolic changes in glycerolipids in the seeds in response to hydration–dehydration cycles.

2. Results

2.1. The Viability of Seeds Gradually Decreased as the Number of Hydration–Dehydration Cycles Increased

We first tested the effects of hydration–dehydration cycles on the viability of Arabidopsis thaliana, Lolium perenne, and Nicotiana tabacum seeds. We hydrated and then dehydrated seeds for six or seven cycles (Figure 2), and determined the germination level after each cycle. The germinations of three species seeds were different, which could be due to their distinct tolerance to dehydration, but they decreased markedly, from almost 100% to 6% for A. thaliana, from almost 100% to 62% for L. perenne, and from almost 100% to 73% for N. tabacum. The most significant decreases occurred after the second cycle for all three species. Hydration and dehydration both decreased the germination level, but dehydration had a stronger effect. These results show that hydration–dehydration cycles decrease seed viability, and that marked damage may occur after the second cycle. A. thaliana seeds are more sensitive than the others to the hydration–dehydration cycle, and provide the duration from full to almost no viability, so we used A. thaliana seeds in subsequent experiments.

2.2. The Total Membrane Lipid Contents of A. thaliana Seeds Changed Significantly through the Hydration–Dehydration Cycles

Samples of A. thaliana seeds collected at five representative time points were subjected to lipidomics analysis. About 140 of the molecular species found in membranes were detected; these included six phospholipid classes (PG, PC, PE, PI, PS, and PA) and two galactolipid classes (MGDG and DGDG). The total membrane lipid contents changed significantly as the number of hydration–dehydration cycles increased (Figure 3 and Table S2). The total lipid content of the dry seeds (C) was 11.23 nmol/mg dry weight (DW). The lipid content increased in the 3H seeds by 31% (from 11.23 to 14.72 nmol/mg DW), then decreased >4-fold, to 3.46 nmol/mg DW, in the 3D seeds. The lipid content then increased by a factor of 4.5 (from 3.46 to 15.52 nmol/mg DW) in the 4H seeds, which was similar to the lipid content of the 3H seeds. The lipid content of the 6D seeds was almost five times lower than the lipid content of the 4H seeds, which was similar to the lipid content of the 3D seeds. These results indicated that hydration increased and dehydration decreased the membrane lipid contents in seeds. In other words, the membrane lipid content was positively related to the dynamic changed water content of the seeds.

2.3. Changes in Lipid Classes during the Hydration–Dehydration Cycles

Different head groups give membrane lipids different physical and chemical properties that may affect their reactions to cellular water deficits. We investigated changes in each lipid class during the hydration–dehydration cycles, and found that the contents of all of the lipid classes, except PA, increased during hydration and decreased during dehydration, meaning that the contents of these seven lipid classes were positively related to the full hydration of the seeds (Figure 4 and Table S2). The PC, PE, and PI contents of the C seeds were higher than the contents of the 3D and 6D seeds, but lower than the contents of the 3H and 4H seeds. By contrast, PA followed the opposite trend to the other seven lipid classes (Figure 4). For example, the PA content of the C seeds was 1.37 nmol/mg DW, but the PA content of the 3H seeds was lower by a factor of 4.72 (from 1.37 to 0.29 nmol/mg DW). The PA content of the 3D seeds was 6.10 times higher (from 0.29 to 1.77 nmol/mg DW) to 3H seeds. These results indicated that specific membrane lipid classes in the seeds responded differently to the continuous hydration–dehydration cycles. The contents of seven lipid classes (PC, PE, PI, PG, PS, MGDG, and DGDG) positively related to full hydration, but the PA content was negatively related to full hydration. In addition, PA contributed >50% of the total lipid contents of 3D and 6D seeds (Figure 5 and Table S3). These results suggested that PA played a distinctive role in cell membranes during hydration–dehydration cycles, and even a critical role during the cumulative imposition of dehydration stress.

2.4. Downward Trends in MGDG and DGDG Contents during the Hydration–Dehydration Cycles

Each head-group class of membrane lipids contains many molecular species distinguished from each other by a standard (total acyl chains/double bonds). The contents and the compositions of almost 140 molecular species were shown in Figure 6 and Figure S1. These reflected the basic trends in the head-group classes, but differences between plastidic and extraplastidic lipids were found. The 34:6 and 36:6 molecular species were the main plastidic DGDG and MGDG species. The 34:6 and 36:6 molecule contents were significantly lower in the 3H and 4H seeds than in the C seeds, indicating that the plastidic lipid contents tended to decrease in seeds during hydration–dehydration cycles. Most of the extraplastidic molecular species of PC, PE, and PI followed the opposite trend, the lipid contents being significantly higher in the 3H and 4H seeds than in the C seeds. Decreasing the MGDG and DGDG contents could block plastid biogenesis [11], so the results supported seeds losing their viability after a number of hydration–dehydration cycles (Figure 2).

2.5. DAG and PA Mediated Glycerolipid Changes during the Hydration–Dehydration Cycles

Why did PA content change in the opposite way to the other lipid contents (Figure 4)? This could be due to its characteristics: (1) PA is a cone-shaped lipid, (2) PA is an intermediate in glycerolipid metabolic pathway. DAG is also cone-shaped and an intermediate in the glycerolipid metabolic pathway, so we propose that DAG may play the same roles as PA during hydration–dehydration cycles in seeds. To test this, we profiled the changes in DAG content during the hydration–dehydration cycles, and found that the DAG content was very high compared with the other lipid class contents, and that the DAG content followed the same trend as the PA content (Figure 7). These results indicated that the DAG content was positively affected by the drying phase of the hydration–dehydration cycles. This suggested that cone-shaped lipids and intermediates in glycerolipid metabolism may play important roles in the responses of seed membranes to dehydration.
Interestingly, the total contents of the glycerolipids that were measured, including DAG and the eight membrane lipid classes mentioned above, remained almost constant through the hydration–dehydration cycles (Figure 7), while the DAG and PA contents fluctuated dramatically. The variance of total glycerolipid content (10.4 ± 8.4%) was significantly lower than that of DAG plus PA content (36.6 ± 16.8%). This raised the question of whether the increases in DAG and PA (group A) content were caused by decreases in the contents of the other seven classes (group B), and vice versa. The turnover between two head-group classes could be investigated by examining the increase–decrease relationship between different molecular species with the same fatty acids [31]. We therefore performed correlation analyses of 14 molecular species in groups A and B (Figure 8) and found that 13 molecular species were negatively correlated, but the 34:6 molecular species were not. This suggests that turnover occurred between the 13 molecular species in groups A and B. Only MGDG, DGDG, PA, and DAG harbor 34:6 molecular species (Figure S2), and 34:6 MGDG and DGDG can be converted specifically into 34:6 PA under freezing conditions [39], so we performed correlation analyses on the 34:6 MGDG and PA, and on the 34:6 DGDG and PA contents (excluding the C seeds), and found negative correlations (r = −0.668 for 34:6 MGDG and PA and r = −0.772 for 34:6 DGDG and PA). This suggested that 34:6 MGDG and DGDG could be converted specifically into 34:6 PA during hydration–dehydration cycles. The results together suggested that the glycerolipid group A and B can convert into each other, but that the total glycerolipid content remained constant in the seeds during the hydration–dehydration cycles. In other words, cycling of glycerolipid metabolites take place during the hydration–dehydration cycles.

2.6. Membrane Lipids Became More Unsaturated during Dehydration

The double bond index (DBI) value represents the degree of lipid unsaturation [40,41]. We calculated DBI for the membrane lipids during the hydration–dehydration cycles, and found that for the total polar lipids, it changed significantly because of the cycles (Table 1). The DBIs for the C, 3H, and 4H seeds were 3.05, 3.05, and 3.02, respectively. The DBIs for the 3D and 6D seeds were 3.13 and 3.31, respectively, significantly higher than the DBIs for the C, 3H, and 4H seeds. This indicated that the unsaturation of the membrane lipids changed in response to seed drying.

2.7. The PS ACL Increased during the Hydration–Dehydration Cycles

The lipid ACL can also affect membrane fluidity. We therefore calculated the membrane lipid ACLs, and found only slight changes except for the PS ACL (Figure 9 and Table S4). The mean membrane lipid ACL was 36 carbons, and the ACL changed by <0.13 carbon (<0.4%) during the continuous hydration–dehydration cycles. This suggested that the ACL contributed very little to membrane fluidity in the seeds during the hydration–dehydration cycles. By contrast, the PS ACL was significantly higher than the other lipid ACLs. The PS ACL increased significantly when the seeds were dehydrated and decreased when the seeds were hydrated. The PS ACL changed by 1.31 carbons (3.2%) between the C and 3H seeds, by 2.34 carbons (5.8%) between the 3H and 3D seeds, and by 2.89 carbons (7.6%) between the 4H and 6D seeds. The ACL of 6D seeds increased to 42.61 carbons. Similar results were previously found for leaves subjected to dehydration and heat shock [37].

2.8. The Profiling of Lyso-Phospholipids during Continuous Hydration–Dehydration Cycles

Lyso-phospholipids, including lysoPC, lysoPG, and lysoPE, are formed through the hydrolysis of fatty acid chain in phospholipids. Lyso-phospholipids are very sensitive to environmental stresses, such as freezing, cold, and heat shock [31,39]. We also profiled the lyso-phospholipid molecular species (Figure 10 and Table S5). The lysoPG content decreased over the full sequence of hydration–dehydration cycles. However, the lysoPC and lysoPE contents changed significantly during a single hydration–dehydration cycle, being highest for the C seeds, decreasing during dehydration, and increasing during hydration. These results indicated that there was different metabolism of specific lyso-phospholipids in seeds on moisture cycling.

3. Discussion

Seeds are commonly affected by hydration–dehydration cycles under natural conditions, and hydration–dehydration cycles have successfully been used to improve seed germination in agricultural and forestry systems. We confirmed the negative effects of multiple hydration–dehydration cycles on A. thaliana, L. perenne, and N. tabacum seed viability, and found that the germination level markedly decreased after the second hydration–dehydration cycle. We profiled the membrane glycerolipid molecular species in A. thaliana seeds during the hydration–dehydration cycles. The contents of seven classes of membrane lipids (PC, PE, PI, PS, PG, MDGD, and DGDG) in the seeds markedly increased and decreased as the moisture varied during hydration and dehydration, respectively, but the PA content changed in the opposite way. The content of the glycerolipid intermediate, DAG, changed markedly in the same way as the PA content. We found that the total glycerolipid content remained constant, even though the contents of PA plus DAG and the sum of other seven classes of glycerolipid changed markedly. These findings mean that there are metabolic cycles of glycerolipids during the hydration–dehydration cycles. Moreover, the plastidic lipid MGDG and DGDG contents decreased, but fluctuated, and the membrane lipid DBI and the PS ACL both increased. These results provided new insights into the lipid molecular responses of seeds to hydration–dehydration cycles.
The effects on seed viability had two distinct phases depending on the number of hydration–dehydration cycles. The first one or two cycles did not affect seed viability (Figure 2) and could even increase it if the cycles were carefully controlled, as in the agricultural practice called priming [9,10,42]. Seed viability gradually decreased, and was totally lost as more cycles occurred. In general, massive degradation of membrane lipids occurred in severe damaged leaves or dying plants [29]. It is puzzling that significant lipid degradation was not detected in A. thaliana seeds. even after the last hydration–dehydration cycle (Figure 4 and Figure 5), when viability was almost totally lost. However, indications of seed death were found in decreasing MGDG and DGDG contents (Figure 4 and Figure 6). Successful germination requires the plastidic lipid MGDG and DGDG contents to increase to allow plastids to form in the shoots [11]. Blocking MGDG and DGDG synthesis through hydration–dehydration cycles therefore prevents full germination. Another indication of seed death was the increase in the PS ACL (Figure 9), as PS acyl chains of living organs are limited to 42 carbons [37]. Thus, lengthening the PS acyl chains through hydration–dehydration cycles could cause seed death.
It is common for abiotic stress to induce changes in membrane lipids, particularly for the PA content to increase [29,43,44,45]. On the one hand, PA increase could be a signal for environmental stimuli [46,47,48], e.g., transiently because of mechanical wounding [45]. On the other hand, PA plays a role as a special membrane structure component with its cone-shape, such as its continuous and massive existence in membranes affected by drought or desiccation [27,29,34]. In this study, the role of PA appears to have been mainly structural, because it was produced in large quantities when the seeds suffered from water deficit and when the membranes shrank intensively. PA can be considered, at least partly, to be a glycerolipid metabolism intermediate, because the substantial turnover among these glycerolipids could occur through PA (Figure 1).
DAG is not a membrane lipid. It localizes in endoplasmic reticulum and plastids to serve as an intermediate in glycerolipid metabolism. The role of DAG in response to stress has been poorly studied. Our results showed, for the first time, that DAG was involved in the response of seeds to water stress. The DAG content of the seeds changed absolutely and relatively in a fluctuating manner during the hydration–dehydration cycles (Figure 7). It followed that the maintenance of total glycerolipids content would only result from an opposite fluctuation in the content of the other seven glycerolipid classes. In other words, (possibly not limited to the one we tested) seeds use internal cycles in the glycerolipid metabolite “pool” that do not involve synthesis and degradation to respond to hydration–dehydration cycles. This is probably an energy- and material-efficient strategy for dealing with environmental stress. But why do seeds decrease their membrane lipids under dehydration? We speculated that water deficit-induced cell shrinking causes its membrane area to decrease. The spare membrane lipids are converted into intermediate DAG. Under hydration, cell shape recovers through the reincorporation of functional membranes, including DAG. These bidirectional turnovers between internal glycerolipids can be performed quickly and efficiently as the seed moisture varies.
In summary, our results indicated the mechanism through which hydration–dehydration cycles cause seeds to die. We proposed a working model for the responses of seeds to hydration–dehydration (Figure 11), and it has potential value for studies on seed priming and survival in the soil seed banks.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Seed Materials

The study was performed on non-dormant seeds of Lolium perenne, Nicotiana tabacum, and Arabidopsis thaliana.

4.2. Hydration–Dehydration Cycles and Sampling Scheme

A. thaliana, L. perenne, and N. tabacum seeds were subjected to continual hydration–dehydration cycles. A. thaliana, L. perenne, and N. tabacum seeds were soaked in water at 25 °C for 2, 2, and 3 d, respectively. The surface water was then removed, and the seeds were dried over an excess of silica gel in a sealed bottle at laboratory temperature for 5 d. A. thaliana and N. tabacum seeds were subjected to six hydration–dehydration cycles, and L. perenne seeds were subjected to seven hydration–dehydration cycles. At each hydration–dehydration cycle, the ability of the seeds to germinate was determined. At specified points of the selected hydration–dehydration cycles, the lipids in the A. thaliana seeds were profiled.

4.3. Seed Germination

Each germination assay was conducted on four replicate groups of seeds. Each A. thaliana, L. perenne, and N. tabacum germination assay was performed using 40, 30, and 40 seeds, respectively. A. thaliana seeds were surface sterilized for 2 min using a 5% hypochlorite solution, then the seeds were rinsed twice with sterilized water. The sterilized seeds were sown in a Petri dish containing 0.7% agar-solidified Murashige and Skoog medium containing 1% sucrose, then the seeds were kept at 4 °C for 2 d. The L. perenne and N. tabacum seeds were sown directly in a Petri dish containing 1% agar-solidified medium. The seed germination tests were performed at 25 °C with light applied at 120 μmol m−2 s−1 light with a 16 h light 8 h dark cycle. Seed germination was scored when radicles more than 2 mm long had emerged from 3 d, 3 d, and 4 d until 30 d after sowing for A. thaliana, L. perenne, and N. tabacum, respectively.

4.4. Lipid Extraction, Electrospray Ionization Tandem Mass Spectrometry Analysis, and Data Processing

Lipid extraction and quantification procedures, as detailed previously, were used with minor modifications [31,38]. Lipids were extracted from five replicate aliquots of A. thaliana seeds per treatment, and each aliquot had a fresh weight of 20–30 mg. Powder from the ground seeds was immediately transferred to 3 mL of isopropanol containing 0.01% butylated hydroxytoluene at 75 °C to inhibit lipolytic activity. Each sample was extracted for 2 d with agitation, in 4 mL of a 2:1 mixture of chloroform and methanol containing 0.01% butylated hydroxytoluene. Each sample was extracted with the chloroform/methanol mixture three times, each time with agitation for 1 week. The remaining seed tissue was heated to 105 °C overnight, and then weighed. The weights of extracted and dried tissue were added together and defined as the dry weight of each sample. The lipid samples were analyzed using a triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer in electrospray ionization mode. The lipids in each class were quantified in comparison to the two internal standards of that class, using a correction curve determined between standards [31]. A Q-test was performed on the total amounts of lipids in each head-group class for the five replicates, and outlying data were then removed. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) method were performed. Correlation coefficient analyses were performed using the Pearson method, using SPSS 19.0 software. The double bond index (DBI) was calculated using the formula
DBI = (Σ[Nb × mol % lipid])/100
N is the number of double bonds in each molecular species. The ACL was calculated using the formula
ACL = (Σ[NC × mol % lipid])/100
NC is the number of acyl carbon atoms in each molecular species.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/19/5/1417/s1. Table S1: Glycerolipids analyzed in this study. R1 or R2, fatty acid. Cho, choline. EA, ethanolamine. Ser, Serine. Gro, glycerol. Ino, inositol. Gal, galactosyl. Cycled-P, PO4−; TableS2: Amounts of membrane lipids in each head-group class and the total membrane lipid contents of the A. thaliana seeds during the hydration–dehydration cycles. C: control (dry seeds), 3H: hydration part of the third hydration–dehydration cycle, 3D: dehydration part of the third hydration–dehydration cycle, 4H: hydration part of the fourth hydration–dehydration cycle, 6D: dehydration part of the sixth hydration–dehydration cycle. DW, Dry weight. TPL, Total polar lipid. Values in the same row with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). Each value is means ± SD (n = 4 or 5). * The PA contents were published previously [34]; Table S3: Compositions of the membrane lipids in each head-group class and the total membrane lipid contents of A. thaliana seeds during the hydration–dehydration cycles. The treatment was the same as that described in Table S2. Values in the same row with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). Each value is means ± SD (n = 4 or 5); Table S4: Acyl chain lengths of the membrane lipids in the A. thaliana seeds during the hydration–dehydration cycles. The treatment was the same as that described in Table S2. Each value is mean ± SD (n = 4 or 5). Values in the same row with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05); Table S5: Lyso-phospholipid contents of the A. thaliana seeds during the hydration–dehydration cycles. The treatment was the same as that described in Table S2. Each value is mean ± SD (n = 4 or 5). Values in the same row with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).

Author Contributions

W.-Q.L. conceived and designed the experiments. X.-L.H., X.-M.Y. and H.-Y.C. performed the experiments; X.-L.H. and X.-M.Y. analyzed the data; X.-L.H. wrote and W.-Q.L. revised the paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Major Science and Technique Programs in Yunnan Province (grant no. 2017AB001), Yunnan Applied Basic Research Project (grant no. 12010100334), Innovation Guidance and Scientific and Technological Enterprise Cultivation Plan in Yunnan Province (grant no. 2017RA001), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 31770375). The authors would like to thank Hugh W. Pritchard his critical reading of this paper. The lipid analyses were performed at the Kansas Lipidomics Research Center.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

PGphosphatidylglycerol
PCphosphatidylcholine
PEphosphatidylethanolamine
PIphosphatidylinositol
PSphosphatidylserine
PAphosphatidic acid
MGDGmonogalactosyldiacylglycerol
DGDGdigalactosyldiacylglycerol
DAGdiacylglycerol
ERendoplasmic reticulum
DBIdouble bond index
ACLacyl chain lengths

References

  1. Roberts, H.A.; Potter, M.E. Emergence Patterns of Weed Seedlings in Relation to Cultivation and Rainfall. Weed Res. 1980, 20, 377–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bewley, J.D.; Black, M. Seeds: Physiology of development and germination. J. Ecol. 1994, 74. [Google Scholar]
  3. Downs, M.P.; Cavers, P.B. Effects of wetting and drying on seed germination and seedling emergence of bull thistle, Cirsium vulgare (Savi) Ten. Can. J. Bot. 2000, 78, 1545–1551. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ritchie, J.T.; Johson, B.S. Soil and plant factors affecting evaporation. Agronomy 1990, 369–390. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhuang, Y.L.; Zhao, W.Z. The ecological role of dew in assisting seed germination of the annual desert plant species in a desert environment, northwestern China. J. Arid Land 2016, 8, 264–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dubrovsky, J.G. Seed hydration memory in Sonoran Desert cacti and its ecological implication. Am. J. Bot. 1996, 83, 624–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ren, J.; Tao, L. Effect of hydration-dehydration cycles on germination of seven Calligonum species. J. Arid Environ. 2003, 55, 111–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Parera, C.A.; Cantliffe, D.J. Improved Germination and Modified Imbibition of shrunken-2 Sweet Corn by Seed Disinfection and Solid Matrix Priming. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1991, 116, 942–945. [Google Scholar]
  9. Girolamo, G.D.; Barbanti, L. Treatment conditions and biochemical processes influencing seed priming effectiveness. Ital. J. Agron. 2012, 7, 178–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Alvarado-Lopez, S.; Soriano, D.; Velazquez, N.; Orozco-Segovia, A.; Gamboa-deBuen, A. Priming effects on seed germination in Tecoma stans (Bignoniaceae) and Cordia megalantha (Boraginaceae), two tropical deciduous tree species. Acta Oecol. 2014, 61, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yu, X.; Li, A.; Li, W. How membranes organize during seed germination: Three patterns of dynamic lipid remodelling define chilling resistance and affect plastid biogenesis. Plant Cell Environ. 2015, 38, 1391–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ramamoorthy, K.; Kalavathi, D.; Paramasivam, M. Maintenance of Vigor and Viability of Stored Pea (Pisum-Sativum L) Seeds. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 1992, 169, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lopez-Urrutia, E.; Martinez-Garcia, M.; Monsalvo-Reyes, A.; Salazar-Rojas, V.; Montoya, R.; Campos, J.E. Differential RNA-and protein-expression profiles of cactus seeds capable of hydration memory. Seed Sci. Res. 2014, 24, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ramamoorthy, K.; Natarajan, N. Seed invigoration by hydration-dehydration for improvement of seed quality in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L). J. Agron. Crop Sci. 1997, 178, 125–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sliwinska, E.; Jendrzejczak, E. Sugar-beet seed quality and DNA synthesis in the embryo in relation to hydration-dehydration cycles. Seed Sci. Technol. 2002, 30, 597–608. [Google Scholar]
  16. Sur, K.; Basu, R.N. Influence of Hydration-Dehydration Treatments of Rice Seed on the Growth of Embryo-Endosperm Transplants. Curr. Sci. 1985, 54, 862–864. [Google Scholar]
  17. Nath, S.; Coolbear, P.; Hampton, J.G. Hydration-Dehydration Treatments to Protect or Repair Stored Karamu Wheat Seeds. Crop Sci. 1991, 31, 822–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Prisco, J.T.; Souto, G.F.; Reboucasferreira, L.G. Overcoming Salinity Inhibition of Sorghum Seed-Germination by Hydration-Dehydration Treatment. Plant Soil 1978, 49, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sanchez, J.A.; Munoz, B.C.; Fresneda, J. Combined effects of hardening hydration-dehydration and heat shock treatments on the germination of tomato, pepper and cucumber. Seed Sci. Technol. 2001, 29, 691–697. [Google Scholar]
  20. Martinez-Ghersa, M.A.; Satorre, E.H.; Ghersa, C.M. Effect of soil water content and temperature on dormancy breaking and germination of three weeds. Weed Sci. 1997, 45, 791–797. [Google Scholar]
  21. Bai, B.; Sikron, N.; Gendler, T.; Kazachkova, Y.; Barak, S.; Grafi, G.; Khozin-Goldberg, I.; Fait, A. Ecotypic Variability in the Metabolic Response of Seeds to Diurnal Hydration-Dehydration Cycles and its Relationship to Seed Vigor. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012, 53, 38–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Thornton, J.M.; Powell, A.A. Prolonged aerated hydration for improvement of seed quality in Brassica oleracea L. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1995, 127, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhu, Y.J.; Yang, X.J.; Baskin, C.C.; Baskin, J.M.; Dong, M.; Huang, Z.Y. Effects of amount and frequency of precipitation and sand burial on seed germination, seedling emergence and survival of the dune grass Leymus secalinus in semiarid China. Plant Soil 2014, 374, 399–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pukacka, S. The effect of desiccation on viability and phospholipid composition of Acer sacharinum L. seeds. Trees-Struct. Funct. 1989, 3, 144–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Stanley, D.W. Biological Membrane Deterioration and Associated Quality Losses in Food Tissues. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. 1991, 30, 487–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Pukacka, S.; Czubak, A. The effect of desiccation on viability and membrane lipid composition of Acer pseudoplatanus seeds. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 1998, 67, 249–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yu, B.; Li, W. Comparative profiling of membrane lipids during water stress in Thellungiella salsuginea and its relative Arabidopsis thaliana. Phytochemistry 2014, 108, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Sang, Y.; Zheng, S.; Li, W.; Huang, B.; Wang, X. Regulation of plant water loss by manipulating the expression of phospholipase Dα. Plant J. 2001, 28, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Li, A.; Wang, D.; Yu, B.; Yu, X.; Li, W. Maintenance or collapse: Responses of extraplastidic membrane lipid composition to desiccation in the resurrection plant Paraisometrum mileense. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e103430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Mai, U.; Morishige, J.; Tanaka, T.; Satouchi, K. Phosphatidic Acid Production in the Processing of Cabbage Leaves. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 11359–11365. [Google Scholar]
  31. Welti, R.; Li, W.; Li, M.; Sang, Y.; Biesiada, H.; Zhou, H.E.; Rajashekar, C.B.; Williams, T.D.; Wang, X. Profiling membrane lipids in plant stress responses. Role of phospholipase D alpha in freezing-induced lipid changes in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 31994–32002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Cullis, P.R.; Kruijff, B.D. Lipid polymorphism and the functional roles of lipids in biological membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1979, 559, 399–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Golovina, E.A.; Hoekstra, F.A. Membrane behavior as influenced by partitioning of amphiphiles during drying: A comparative study in anhydrobiotic plant systems. Comp. Biochem. Phys. A 2002, 131, 545–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, H.; Yu, X.; Zhang, X.; Yang, L.; Huang, X.; Zhang, J.; Pritchard, H.W.; Li, W. Phospholipase Dalpha1-mediated phosphatidic acid change is a key determinant of desiccation-induced viability loss in seeds. Plant Cell Environ. 2018, 41, 50–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Pham Thi, A.T.; Silva, J.V.D.; Mazliak, P. The role of membrane lipids in drought resistance of plants. Bull. Soc. Bot. Fr. 1990, 137, 99–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Repellin, A.; Thi, A.T.P.; Tashakorie, A.; Sahsah, Y.; Daniel, C.; Zuily-Fodil, Y. Leaf membrane lipids and drought tolerance in young coconut palms (Cocos nucifera L.). Eur. J. Agron. 1997, 6, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, Y.; Zheng, G.; Jia, Y.; Yu, X.; Zhang, X.; Yu, B.; Wang, D.; Zheng, Y.; Tian, X.; Li, W. Acyl chain length of phosphatidylserine is correlated with plant lifespan. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e103227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Welti, R.; Shah, J.; Li, W.Q.; Li, M.Y.; Chen, J.P.; Burke, J.J.; Fauconnier, M.L.; Chapman, K.; Chye, M.L.; Wang, X.M. Plant lipidomics: Discerning biological function by profiling plant complex lipids using mass spectrometry. Front. Biosci. 2007, 12, 2494–2506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Li, W.; Wang, R.; Li, M.; Li, L.; Wang, C.; Welti, R.; Wang, X. Differential degradation of extraplastidic and plastidic lipids during freezing and post-freezing recovery in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 461–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Osmond, D.L.; Wilson, R.F.; Raper, C.D. Fatty Acid Composition and Nitrate Uptake of Soybean Roots during Acclimation to Low Temperature. Plant Physiol. 1982, 70, 1689–1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Bakht, J.; Bano, A.; Dominy, P. The role of abscisic acid and low temperature in chickpea (Cicer arietinum) cold tolerance. II. Effects on plasma membrane structure and function. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 3707–3715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Paparella, S.; Araujo, S.S.; Rossi, G.; Wijayasinghe, M.; Carbonera, D.; Balestrazzi, A. Seed priming: State of the art and new perspectives. Plant Cell Rep. 2015, 34, 1281–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Welti, R.; Wang, X. Lipid species profiling: A high-throughput approach to identify lipid compositional changes and determine the function of genes involved in lipid metabolism and signaling. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2004, 7, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Arisz, S.A.; Valianpour, F.; van Gennip, A.H.; Munnik, T. Substrate preference of stress-activated phospholipase D in Chlamydomonas and its contribution to PA formation. Plant J. 2003, 34, 595–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zien, C.A.; Wang, C.; Wang, X.; Welti, R. In vivo substrates and the contribution of the common phospholipase D, PLDα, to wound-induced metabolism of lipids in Arabidopsis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2001, 1530, 236–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, X. Phospholipase D in hormonal and stress signaling. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2002, 5, 408–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Meijer, H.J.; Munnik, T. Phospholipid-based signaling in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2003, 54, 265–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Wang, X. Lipid signaling. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2004, 7, 329–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 19 01417 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic of glycerolipid turnover.
Figure 1. Schematic of glycerolipid turnover.
Ijms 19 01417 g001
Ijms 19 01417 g002 550
Figure 2. Effects of hydration–dehydration cycles on the germination levels of (a) A. thaliana seeds, (b) L. perenne seeds, and (c) N. tabacum seeds. The A. thaliana and L. perenne seeds were hydrated for 2 d and dehydrated for 5 d in each cycle, and the N. tabacum seeds were hydrated for 3 d and dehydrated for 5 d in each cycle. Germination data are mean ± SD (n = 4 replicates, each replicate being 30 or 40 seeds). h: hydration, d: dehydration. * The A. thaliana germination levels were published previously [34].
Figure 2. Effects of hydration–dehydration cycles on the germination levels of (a) A. thaliana seeds, (b) L. perenne seeds, and (c) N. tabacum seeds. The A. thaliana and L. perenne seeds were hydrated for 2 d and dehydrated for 5 d in each cycle, and the N. tabacum seeds were hydrated for 3 d and dehydrated for 5 d in each cycle. Germination data are mean ± SD (n = 4 replicates, each replicate being 30 or 40 seeds). h: hydration, d: dehydration. * The A. thaliana germination levels were published previously [34].
Ijms 19 01417 g002
Ijms 19 01417 g003 550
Figure 3. Total membrane lipid contents of A. thaliana seeds during the hydration–dehydration cycles. C: control (dry seeds), 3H: hydration part of the third hydration–dehydration cycle, 3D: dehydration part of the third hydration–dehydration cycle, 4H: hydration part of the fourth hydration–dehydration cycle, 6D: dehydration part of the sixth hydration–dehydration cycle. DW, dry weight. Each value is mean ± SD (n = 4 or 5). Values with different letters indicate that values are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Total membrane lipid contents of A. thaliana seeds during the hydration–dehydration cycles. C: control (dry seeds), 3H: hydration part of the third hydration–dehydration cycle, 3D: dehydration part of the third hydration–dehydration cycle, 4H: hydration part of the fourth hydration–dehydration cycle, 6D: dehydration part of the sixth hydration–dehydration cycle. DW, dry weight. Each value is mean ± SD (n = 4 or 5). Values with different letters indicate that values are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Ijms 19 01417 g003
Ijms 19 01417 g004 550
Figure 4. Amounts of membrane lipids in each head-group class in A. thaliana seeds during hydration–dehydration cycles. The treatment was the same as that described in Figure 3. DGDG, digalactosyldiacylglycerol. MGDG, monogalactosyldiacylglycerol. PG, phosphatidylglycerol. PC, phosphatidylcholine. PE, phosphatidylethanolamine. PI, phosphatidylinositol. PS, phosphatidylserine. PA, phosphatidic acid. DW, dry weight. Each value is mean ± SD (n = 4 or 5). Bars for the same lipid class with different letters indicate that the values were significantly different (p < 0.05). * The PA content was published previously [34].
Figure 4. Amounts of membrane lipids in each head-group class in A. thaliana seeds during hydration–dehydration cycles. The treatment was the same as that described in Figure 3. DGDG, digalactosyldiacylglycerol. MGDG, monogalactosyldiacylglycerol. PG, phosphatidylglycerol. PC, phosphatidylcholine. PE, phosphatidylethanolamine. PI, phosphatidylinositol. PS, phosphatidylserine. PA, phosphatidic acid. DW, dry weight. Each value is mean ± SD (n = 4 or 5). Bars for the same lipid class with different letters indicate that the values were significantly different (p < 0.05). * The PA content was published previously [34].
Ijms 19 01417 g004
Ijms 19 01417 g005 550
Figure 5. Contributions of the membrane lipids in each head-group class to the total membrane lipid contents of the A. thaliana seeds during the hydration–dehydration cycles. The treatment was the same as that described in Figure 3.
Figure 5. Contributions of the membrane lipids in each head-group class to the total membrane lipid contents of the A. thaliana seeds during the hydration–dehydration cycles. The treatment was the same as that described in Figure 3.
Ijms 19 01417 g005
Ijms 19 01417 g006 550
Figure 6. Molecular species contents of A. thaliana seeds during the hydration–dehydration cycles. The treatment was the same as that described in Figure 3. DW, dry weight. Each value is mean ± SD (n = 4 or 5). * The PA contents were published previously [34].
Figure 6. Molecular species contents of A. thaliana seeds during the hydration–dehydration cycles. The treatment was the same as that described in Figure 3. DW, dry weight. Each value is mean ± SD (n = 4 or 5). * The PA contents were published previously [34].
Ijms 19 01417 g006
Ijms 19 01417 g007 550
Figure 7. Total glycerolipid content of the A. thaliana seeds during the hydration–dehydration cycles. The treatment was the same as that described in Figure 3. DW, dry weight. * The PA contents were published previously [34].
Figure 7. Total glycerolipid content of the A. thaliana seeds during the hydration–dehydration cycles. The treatment was the same as that described in Figure 3. DW, dry weight. * The PA contents were published previously [34].
Ijms 19 01417 g007
Ijms 19 01417 g008 550
Figure 8. Correlation coefficients for group A and B of 14 molecular species. In group A, PA and DAG harbor all 14 molecular species. In group B, PG, PC, PE, and PI harbor 32:0 molecular species; PG, PE, and PI harbor 32:1 molecular species; DGDG, MGDG, PG, PC, PE, PI, and PS harbor 34:1, 34:2, 34:3, 34:4, 36:1, 36:2, 36:3, 36:4, 36:5, and 36:6 molecular species; DGDG and MGDG harbor 34:5 and 34:6 molecular species. The bars with asterisks are significantly different (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Figure 8. Correlation coefficients for group A and B of 14 molecular species. In group A, PA and DAG harbor all 14 molecular species. In group B, PG, PC, PE, and PI harbor 32:0 molecular species; PG, PE, and PI harbor 32:1 molecular species; DGDG, MGDG, PG, PC, PE, PI, and PS harbor 34:1, 34:2, 34:3, 34:4, 36:1, 36:2, 36:3, 36:4, 36:5, and 36:6 molecular species; DGDG and MGDG harbor 34:5 and 34:6 molecular species. The bars with asterisks are significantly different (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Ijms 19 01417 g008
Ijms 19 01417 g009 550
Figure 9. Acyl chain lengths (ACLs) of glycerolipids in the A. thaliana seeds during the hydration–dehydration cycles. The treatment was the same as that described in Figure 3. TPL, Total polar lipids. Each value is mean ± SD (n = 4 or 5). Bars for the same lipid class with different letters indicate that the values were significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 9. Acyl chain lengths (ACLs) of glycerolipids in the A. thaliana seeds during the hydration–dehydration cycles. The treatment was the same as that described in Figure 3. TPL, Total polar lipids. Each value is mean ± SD (n = 4 or 5). Bars for the same lipid class with different letters indicate that the values were significantly different (p < 0.05).
Ijms 19 01417 g009
Ijms 19 01417 g010 550
Figure 10. Lyso-phospholipid molecular species contents in the A. thaliana seeds during the hydration–dehydration cycles. The treatment was the same as that described in Figure 3. DW, dry weight. Each value is mean ± SD (n = 4 or 5). Bars for the same molecular species with different letters indicate that the values were significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 10. Lyso-phospholipid molecular species contents in the A. thaliana seeds during the hydration–dehydration cycles. The treatment was the same as that described in Figure 3. DW, dry weight. Each value is mean ± SD (n = 4 or 5). Bars for the same molecular species with different letters indicate that the values were significantly different (p < 0.05).
Ijms 19 01417 g010
Ijms 19 01417 g011 550
Figure 11. Working model for a metabolic cycle in glycerolipids during hydration–dehydration cycles. The metabolic cycles in glycerolipids are just between intermediate pool in endoplasmic reticulum /plastid and final products of glycerolipids in membranes and not involved in synthesis or degradation. The seeds use the metabolic cycles to respond to hydration–dehydration cycles.
Figure 11. Working model for a metabolic cycle in glycerolipids during hydration–dehydration cycles. The metabolic cycles in glycerolipids are just between intermediate pool in endoplasmic reticulum /plastid and final products of glycerolipids in membranes and not involved in synthesis or degradation. The seeds use the metabolic cycles to respond to hydration–dehydration cycles.
Ijms 19 01417 g011
Table
Table 1. Changes in the double bond index (DBI) for the total polar lipids in the A. thaliana seeds during the hydration–dehydration cycles.
Table 1. Changes in the double bond index (DBI) for the total polar lipids in the A. thaliana seeds during the hydration–dehydration cycles.
Double Bond Index (DBI)
C3H3D4H6D
3.05 ± 0.02 c3.05 ± 0.02 c3.13 ± 0.03 b3.02 ± 0.04 c3.31 ± 0.02 a
The treatment was the same as that described in Figure 3. Each value is mean ± SD (n = 4 or 5). Values in the same row with different letters indicate that values are significantly different (p < 0.05).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hu, X.-L.; Yu, X.-M.; Chen, H.-Y.; Li, W.-Q. Turnover of Glycerolipid Metabolite Pool and Seed Viability. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1417. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19051417

AMA Style

Hu X-L, Yu X-M, Chen H-Y, Li W-Q. Turnover of Glycerolipid Metabolite Pool and Seed Viability. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018; 19(5):1417. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19051417

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hu, Xiao-Long, Xiao-Mei Yu, Hong-Ying Chen, and Wei-Qi Li. 2018. "Turnover of Glycerolipid Metabolite Pool and Seed Viability" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19, no. 5: 1417. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19051417

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop