Next Article in Journal
Targeting the Polyadenylation Signal of Pre-mRNA: A New Gene Silencing Approach for Facioscapulohumeral Dystrophy
Previous Article in Journal
SOD1 in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: “Ambivalent” Behavior Connected to the Disease
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 19
Issue 5
10.3390/ijms19051346
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Screening of Natural Product Derivatives Identifies Two Structurally Related Flavonoids as Potent Quorum Sensing Inhibitors against Gram-Negative Bacteria

by
Suvi Manner
1 and
Adyary Fallarero
2,*
1
Pharmaceutical Sciences Laboratory, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Åbo Akademi University, Artillerigatan 6A, FI-20520 Turku, Finland
2
Pharmaceutical Design and Discovery (PharmDD), Pharmaceutical Biology, Division of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Viikinkaari 5E, P.O. Box 56, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(5), 1346; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19051346
Submission received: 1 April 2018 / Revised: 28 April 2018 / Accepted: 30 April 2018 / Published: 3 May 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Bioactives and Nutraceuticals)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Owing to the failure of conventional antibiotics in biofilm control, alternative approaches are urgently needed. Inhibition of quorum sensing (QS) represents an attractive target since it is involved in several processes essential for biofilm formation. In this study, a compound library of natural product derivatives (n = 3040) was screened for anti-quorum sensing activity using Chromobacterium violaceum as reporter bacteria. Screening assays, based on QS-mediated violacein production and viability, were performed in parallel to identify non-bactericidal QS inhibitors (QSIs). Nine highly active QSIs were identified, while 328 compounds were classified as moderately actives and 2062 compounds as inactives. Re-testing of the highly actives at a lower concentration against C. violaceum, complemented by a literature search, led to the identification of two flavonoid derivatives as the most potent QSIs, and their impact on biofilm maturation in Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa was further investigated. Finally, effects of these leads on swimming and swarming motility of P. aeruginosa were quantified. The identified flavonoids affected all the studied QS-related functions at micromolar concentrations. These compounds can serve as starting points for further optimization and development of more potent QSIs as adjunctive agents used with antibiotics in the treatment of biofilms.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Biofilm formation complicates treatment of various infections, especially those related to the use of medical devices [1]. Conventional antibiotics aimed at killing or inhibiting the growth of dividing, planktonic cells are inefficient in the treatment of biofilm-associated infections. In biofilms, where cells exist as heterogeneous populations with various growth rates (including dormant cells), embedded in a protective matrix of extracellular polymeric substances, cell-to-cell communication plays an important role [2]. This process, termed quorum sensing (QS), seems to be crucial for biofilm formation, and it has emerged as a prominent target for finding effective strategies aimed at biofilm control.
Both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria use QS to coordinate gene expression in a population density dependent manner. However, QS systems differ between species in terms of signal types, receptors, and signal transduction [3,4]. In Gram-negative bacteria, N-acyl-l-homoserine lactone (AHL) signal molecules called autoinducers (AIs) mainly mediate QS. In general, AHL-type AIs consist of a homoserine lactone (HSL) moiety couple with a fatty acid of varying length and oxidation state [5,6]. The AHL-dependent QS systems comprise of two proteins of LuxI and LuxR families, the former being responsible for the synthesis of the AIs and the latter detecting and binding of them [7]. The concentration of AIs increases in a cell density-dependent manner, and when a threshold concentration is reached, the signal molecules are bound to LuxR-like proteins. Thereafter, the AI–LuxR complex further activates the transcription of genes responsible for diverse phenotypes, such as violacein production in Chromobacterium violaceum, pathogenesis and virulence factors production, including motility and biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa [4,8]. In P. aeruginosa, two AHL-dependent, LuxI/LuxR homologous systems, LasI/LasR and RhlI/RhlR exist. Moreover, the RhlI/RhlR system is under control of the LasI/LasR system at both transcriptional and posttranslational level [9].
Given the species specificity and broad-spectrum impact, QS represents an attractive target of anti-biofilm drug discovery. The inhibition of QS systems can be accomplished in different ways, namely, by inhibiting the signal generator, by degrading the signal molecule or by blocking the signal receptor [10]. The enzymatic degradation of the signal molecule is specifically known as quorum quenching [11]. Since QS regulates expression of several virulence factors, quorum sensing inhibitors (QSIs) can be used to attenuate bacterial virulence. Moreover, QSIs can make biofilms more susceptible to conventional antibiotics and the host immune system, and thus, lower doses and shorter antibiotic treatments would be needed [12,13]. Importantly, since QS does not affect the bacterial growth, QSIs are expected to be less prone to resistance development than bactericidal compounds [14].
Natural compounds have been a rich source of innovation in antimicrobial drug discovery, not only as antimicrobials but also as leads in drug design [15]. Natural compounds include complex structures that can provide a wide array of mechanisms of action compared to conventional antibiotics. Various types of QSIs have also been identified from natural sources [16,17]. Among the phytochemicals, halogenated furanones from the marine alga Delisea pulchra are the most studied class of QSIs [18,19,20]. In addition, diverse plant-derived compounds and their synthetic analogues and derivatives, such as tannins [21], cinnamaldehyde from cinnamon [22], iberin from horseradish [23], ajoene from garlic [24] and rosmarinic acid [25] have been reported to exhibit anti-quorum sensing activity against both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria.
In this context, the aim of this study was to identify QSIs from a library of 3040 chemically diverse, naturally inspired compounds. The library (NDL-3000, TimTec, Newark, DE, USA) containing natural derivatives, analogs, semi-natural compounds and mimics covers several compound classes, such as alkaloids, carbohydrates, flavonoids, steroidal compounds, amino acids, and purines. A microtiter well plate-based screening platform using C. violaceum as reporter bacteria was utilized for the identification of QSIs. The platform was recently optimized for the exploration of QSIs from natural compound libraries and successfully applied to the identification of flavonoids as QSIs by our group [26]. In C. violaceum, LuxI/LuxR homolog CviI/CviR is responsible for the production of violacein, a purple pigment, which serves as a useful indicator of QS. The loss of the pigment, in turn, indicates inhibition of QS [27]. Moreover, effects of the identified leads, selected based on the inhibition of violacein production and selectivity, were further evaluated against other QS-regulated functions, including biofilm maturation and motility in other Gram-negative species (P. aeruginosa and Escherichia coli), which use LuxI/LuxR homologs to control their communal behavior. Furthermore, effects of the leads on bacterial growth and cell viability were investigated.

2. Results

2.1. Primary Screening for Quorum Sensing Inhibitors (QSIs) Using Two Strains of C. violaceum as Reporter Bacteria and Classification of the Compounds

C. violaceum has been extensively used as a model bacterium in screening for QSIs [28,29,30,31,32,33]. Here, the compound library was initially tested against C. violaceum, utilizing screening assays for quantification of violacein production and viability in parallel, because only those compounds that induce inhibition of the violacein production, without affecting the growth of bacteria, can be considered as true QSIs [29]. Further, the simultaneous use of two strains of C. violaceum, American Type Culture Collection, ATCC 31532 and its mini-Tn5 mutant strain CV026 (National Collection of Type Cultures, Public Health England, NCTC 13278), as reporter bacteria, enabled the differentiation between QSIs and quorum quenchers (QQs), thus making the screening more comprehensive. This is because the mutant strain produces violacein only in the presence of exogenous AHLs [27], and therefore, it can be assumed that activity of those compounds, which were active only against this strain, is due to direct interference and degradation of AHL. Finally, QSIs were classified as highly actives, moderately actives and inactives according to the inhibitory activity on violacein production (Figure 1).
The selection criteria, applied to the classification of compounds, was adapted from our previous contribution [34]. To obtain a reasonable number of compounds for the secondary screens, the threshold for highly active compounds was set at ≥90% inhibition of violacein production, as compared to untreated controls on both strains. Altogether, 42 compounds, when tested at 400 µM, met this criterion. Among these compounds, 33 were found to display bactericidal activity (higher than 40% inhibition of bacterial viability) against one or both strains, as measured by resazurin staining assay. The remaining nine compounds were classified as highly actives, resulting in an overall hit rate of 0.3% (Figure 2). Only these compounds were selected for further studies.
Additionally, 105 compounds exhibited strain-specific activity and inhibited violacein production by more than 90% in one strain with lower or no activity on the other. Of these, 73 compounds were non-bactericidal and classified as moderately actives. Further, from this group, 14 compounds were highly active against the mutant strain CV026 but inactive (less than 40% inhibition of violacein production) against ATCC 31532 strain, and they were categorized as QQs (n = 14) (Table S1). Moreover, all the compounds that resulted in an inhibition of 40–89% on violacein production without affecting the bacterial growth were also deemed moderately actives (n = 255). Finally, all the non-bactericidal compounds with less than 40% inhibitory activity on violacein production in one or both strains were classified as inactive (n = 2062). Altogether, 641 compounds displayed bactericidal activity. A complete list of the compounds included in the study (compound IDs, International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry, IUPAC names and smiles, provided by TimTec, Newark, DE, USA, www.timtec.net, email: [email protected]) can be found in the Table S3.

2.2. Highly Active QSIs

Based upon the primary screening, nine highly active QSIs were identified (Table 1).
Among these highly active compounds, flavonoids with five representatives (341, 575, 916, 2117 and 2896) were the most represented class (Table 1). These plant secondary metabolites are one of the most widespread and extensively studied classes of natural products that have been shown to exhibit a number of biological activities [34,35,36]. Various flavonoids have also been reported with anti-QS activity against C. violaceum. Flavonols, such as quercetin [37,38,39] and kaempferol [37], glycosylated citrus flavanones naringin, hesperidin and neohesperidin [40], flavanones naringenin, eriodictyol and taxifolin [41], and flavan-3-ols, (−)-cathechin [42] and (−)-epicatechin [43] have shown to inhibit violacein production in C. violaceum without inhibiting the growth. Here, compounds 341, 575, 2117 and 2896 were characterized as flavonoid derivatives, more accurately, 341 as an isoflavonoid derivative, 575 as a flavonol derivative, and compounds 2117 and 2896 as flavone derivatives, whereas compound 916 was characterized as a naturally occurring flavone (6,7-dihydroxyflavone). To the best of our knowledge, the anti-QS activity of isoflavonoids against C. violaceum has not been previously reported. However, dalbinol, an isoflavonoid of rotenoid class, structurally-related to compound 341 has been shown to inhibit P. aeruginosa biofilms at low micromolar concentrations without antibacterial activity [44].
The four remaining highly active QSIs were identified as a nucleoside (cytidine) analogue (144), a mixture of two compounds (339, see details in Table 1), a lignan (1698) and an alkaloid (2307). Previously, QSI activity of some similar compounds, has been reported. Diverse nucleoside analogues have been demonstrated to interfere with auto-inducer 2 (AI-2)-based interspecies QS in multiple Vibrio species [45] but no previous reports exist either on cytidine analogues as QSIs or on inhibition of AHL-based QS-systems by nucleoside analogues. In 339, a mixture of penicillin and 4-[[2-(diethylamino)ethoxy]methyl]aniline are present. Structurally distinct organosulfur compounds, such as isothiocyanates [43] and components of garlic extracts [46], have been identified as QSIs using C. violaceum. In addition, in 339, the core structure of penicillin is included. Interestingly, ceftazidime, another antibiotic of beta-lactam class, has been shown to inhibit QS in P. aeruginosa at sub-MIC concentrations [47]. Compound 1698 was characterized as a furofuran type lignan, pinoresinol, glycosidically linked to a disaccharide, rutinose. Previously, anti-biofilm activity of another furofuran lignan, (+)-medioresinol, against P. aeruginosa and E. coli has been demonstrated [48], but so far, anti-QS activity against C. violaceum has not been reported, to the best of our knowledge. Compound 2307 comprises an aminothiazole linked to an indole moiety. Indole and indole-3-carbinol have demonstrated to inhibit violacein production in C. violaceum [49,50], and 4-(o-methoxyphenyl)-2-aminothiazole has been shown to act as a QSI in P. aeruginosa [51].
Our group has previously reported the anti-QS activity of two of the compounds included within these highly active QSIs, in a screening study utilizing C. violaceum as reporter bacteria [26]. Flavone 916 was classified as moderately active, while compound 2117 was among the most active compounds. Furthermore, 916 has also been found to display anti-biofilm activity against Staphylococcus aureus by both preventing biofilm formation and by eradicating pre-formed biofilms [34]. These results demonstrate that compound 916 possess non-selective, broader anti-biofilm activity. Similarly, both anti-QS and anti-biofilm activities of other flavones, such as luteolin, apigenin and chrysin have been reported against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [52,53,54]. Thus, this primary screening led to the identification of nine structurally diverse QSIs of C. violaceum, of which seven have not been previously reported. The structures of the highly active QSIs are shown in Figure 3. Notably, none of them fully resembles the structure of native AHLs in C. violaceum [55].

2.3. Selection and Characterization of the Leads

The effects of the highly active compounds on violacein production were measured at 40 µM against C. violaceum ATCC 31532. In this trial, only compound 2117 preserved its high activity by inhibiting violacein production by more than 90% (Table 2). Based on these results, compound 2117 and the second most active compound 2896, which resulted in an inhibition of 83.5%, were selected as leads. In order to identify selective QSIs without any off-target effects, reported bioactivities associated with the highly active compounds were examined using PubChem Bioassay project database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pcassay). No bioactivity records were found on the selected leads. While performing data mining on the leads, the other highly active compounds were also investigated. Two of them (575 and 916) were found to be included in previously reported studies. Compound 575 was not active, when investigated for the anti-cancer activity while compound 916 was found to display diverse bioactivities, including also inhibition of cancer cell lines [56]. This finding further emphasizes the multi-target mode of action of compound 916 instead of its potential to act as a selective QSI.
Following the retesting, the half-inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of the two lead compounds (2117, 2896) and quercetin, which was included as a positive control in primary screening, were determined against C. violaceum ATCC 31532. All the compounds exhibited concentration-dependent inhibition of violacein production. Potency (IC50) values were calculated using the Graphpad Prism software, and found to be in the low micromolar range (Table 2). Of the leads, compound 2117 had the lowest IC50 value of 9.6 µM.
A clear structural similarity was observed between the two lead compounds 2117 and 2896 (see structures in Figure 4A,B). Both leads are flavonoid derivatives, in which esters of carboxylic (2117) and fatty (2896) acid are linked to the flavone backbone as side chains. However, they differ in the length of the side chain in addition to the substituents on the phenyl ring (B-ring). In 2117 (2-(2-chlorophenyl)-4-oxochromen-3-yl propanoate), chlorine atom is present, while 2896 (2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4-oxochromen-3-yl decanoate) contains a methoxy group as a substituent (Figure 4).
Fatty acids have earlier been reported to interfere with QS and biofilm development in P. aeruginosa. For instance, lyngbyoic acid—a major metabolite of cyanobacterium Lyngbya cf. majuscula—has been shown to inhibit QS in P. aeruginosa [57]. Another example is the cis-2-decenoic acid—a fatty acid produced by P. aeruginosa that controls biofilms by both inhibiting biofilm formation and by inducing biofilm dispersal in both Gram-positive and Gram-negative species, including P. aeruginosa [58]. It may then be speculated that the presence of a fatty acid promotes the anti-QS activity of the compound 2896. Moreover, a slight structural similarity among the two identified leads and two different AHL can be seen (Figure 4). The carbonyl function is located at the first carbon in the side chain. These AHLs are the N-hexanoyl-l-homoserine lactone C6-HSL, the short chain AHL produced by C. violaceum ATCC 31532 [59] and the autoinducer (N-(β-ketocaproyl)-l-Homoserine) added to C. violaceum CV026 cultures to induce violacein production. Thus, it can be hypothesized that the lead compounds may act as QS-inhibitors by competing with AHLs for receptor binding to the LuxR homologue, in a manner resembling competitive inhibition. Furthermore, in the CV026 strain, which requires exogenous AHL (C4 to C8) to produce violacein, addition of AHLs with longer side chains (C10 to C14) is known to lead to inhibition of violacein production [27]. This fact may further explain the activity of the compound 2896.
Finally, it is important to highlight that both leads were included in the flavonoid library, previously screened by our group for anti-biofilm activity against S. aureus [34]. In this study, both compounds were classified as inactives. This further supports the presented evidence that the compounds 2117 and 2896 preferentially act only on Gram-negative bacteria and, therefore, emphasizes their potential as selective QSIs.

2.4. Impact of the Leads on Biofilm Maturation and Architecture in Other Gram-Negative Species

Since QS plays a significant role in biofilm formation and differentiation [9,60] effects of the leads were studied on the maturation of several P. aeruginosa strains (ATCC 9027, ATCC 15442 and PA01) as well as E. coli K-12 biofilms. In P. aeruginosa, LuxI/LuxR homolog LasI/LasR system regulates biofilm maturation [61], while in E. coli, orphan LuxR homolog sdiA [62] is likely involved in biofilm maturation. Indeed, compounds inhibiting CviI/CviR system in C. violaceum have also shown to interfere with biofilm maturation of E. coli [26]. In this assay, effects of the compounds 2117 and 2896 on the transition from microcolonies to fully formed biofilms were investigated using crystal violet staining and transmitted light microscopy. The microscopic analysis revealed that exposure to the lead compounds at 100 µM led to the alteration of biofilm structure and reduced biofilm formation when compared to untreated biofilms of all the tested strains (Figure 5). However, the impact varied between compounds and strains. Qualitative changes in biofilm architecture have been also reported by other QSIs, such as halogenated furanones and garlic [63,64].
Further, quantitative analysis showed that biofilm biomass was reduced by 11–51% compared to the untreated biofilms, when formed microcolonies were exposed and incubated with the lead compounds (Table 3).
Compound 2117 displayed higher inhibitory activity than 2896, except for in case of P. aeruginosa ATCC 15422. These results are in line with the observations made on biofilm architecture (Figure 5). However, overall, the inhibitory activity of the leads even at the highest test concentration (400 µM) against these Gram-negative species remained modest as compared to their activity against C. violaceum. This finding can be likely explained by the fact that even though the QS-systems of C. violaceum and P. aeruginosa are homologs of LuxI/LuxR system, they differ between species. Strain-specificity, over the system-specificity has been reported for QSIs [23].
Nevertheless, these observations demonstrate the potential of the leads to disrupt biofilm maturation leading to formation of weaker biofilms. Therefore, it can be proposed that use of the leads as adjunctive agents could increase the antimicrobial susceptibility of biofilms, and further enhance the efficacy of the conventional antibiotics. Such features have been previously reported for QSIs [12,63,65].

2.5. Impact of the Leads on Swarming and Swimming Motility

QS-mediated swarming and swimming motilities are considered as important features of Gram-negative bacteria for the surface attachment during the early steps of biofilm formation as well as for biofilm maturation [66,67,68]. Therefore, the ability of the lead compounds to interfere with these processes in P. aeruginosa PAO1 was studied. Various compounds, for example, phenolic compounds, such as flavonol quercetin [37,39], flavones chrysin and baicalein [69], and proanthocyanidins from cranberry [70] have been shown to inhibit motility of P. aeruginosa. Moreover, a fatty acid, anteiso-C15:0 has been also found to inhibit swarming motility of P. aeruginosa [71]. Here, the leads significantly reduced both types of motilities in a concentration-dependent manner, as illustrated in Figure 6. When tested at the highest test concentration (400 µM), both leads 2117 and 2896 were more effective compared to quercetin, used as a positive control in the assay, by inhibiting swarming motility by 72.1% and 69.8%, respectively. In terms of swimming motility, higher inhibition (33.9%) was recorded for the compound 2896 than compound 2117 (28.1%). Inhibition of motility can be correlated with the reduced capacity of P. aeruginosa to form biofilms in presence of the leads. However, the lead compounds did not affect the RhlI/RhlR controlled rhamnolipid biosynthesis in P. aeruginosa that has been connected to swimming and swarming motility [72,73].

2.6. Impact of the Leads on Growth of P. aeruginosa and E. coli

To confirm that any of the observed anti-QS activities was not connected to bactericidal activity, impact of the leads on the growth of P. aeruginosa and E. coli was quantified. Neither of the leads displayed any bactericidal activity, as determined by viable plate counts (Figure S1). Hence, the identified lead compounds 2117 and 2896 can be considered as true QSIs that do not rely upon antibacterial activity as conventional antimicrobials [13].

2.7. Cytotoxicity of the Leads

In vitro cytotoxicity of the leads was measured against HL and RAW 264.7 cell lines. Compound 2117 when assayed at the highest test concentration (100 µM) affected the viability of both cell lines to varying extent, while compound 2896 did not display any effects on the cell viability after 24 h exposure (Table 4). A clear cytotoxic effect of 2117 was observed against RAW 264.7 cell line, whereas against HL cells it demonstrated minor cytotoxicity (<20% inhibition of the viability). Thus, results obtained from the cytotoxicity assay indicate that compound 2896, without any off-target cytotoxicity, is more selective than 2117 as a QSI. However, 2117 inhibited QS in C. violaceum at substantially lower, non-toxic concentrations.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Compound Library

A Natural Derivatives Library, NDL-3000 composed of 3040 distinct samples was purchased from TimTec Inc. (Newark, DE, USA). Compounds in the library were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, minimum 99.9%; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) to a concentration of 20 mM, and stored in matrix tubes at −20 °C. Purity (>95%) and identity of the compounds was confirmed by the supplier using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC), and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance spectroscopy (NMR) (300 MHz or higher) and Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC/MS), respectively. The NDL-3000 library comprises chemically diverse semi-natural, natural derived, and natural compounds-like synthetic compounds, such as alkaloids, natural phenols, nucleoside analogs, carbohydrates, purines, pyrimidines, flavonoids, steroidal compounds and natural amino acids (http://www.timtec.net). A complete list of the compounds included in the study (compound IDs, IUPAC names and smiles as provided by TimTec, Newark, DE, USA, www.timtec.net, email: [email protected]) is included in Table S3.

3.2. Bacterial Strains, Media and Culture Conditions

C. violaceum (ATCC 31532, a biomarker strain) and P. aeruginosa (ATCC 9027, ATCC 15442) were purchased from American type Culture Collection (ATCC; Wesel, Germany) and C. violaceum CV026 (NCTC 13278, a mini-Tn5 mutant of C. violaceum ATCC 31532) from Public Health England’s National Culture of Type Collection (NCTC; Salisbury, UK). P. aeruginosa PAO1 and E. coli K-12 were obtained from University of Helsinki, HAMBI collection (http://www.helsinki.fi/hambi/).
C. violaceum was grown in 3 mL of 30 g/L tryptic soy broth (TSB, Fluka Biochemika, Buchs, Switzerland) until an optical density 595 (OD595) equivalent to 0.7 (~109 CFU/mL) under aerobic conditions (27 °C, 200 rpm shaking) overnight. P. aeruginosa (ATCC 9027, ATCC 15442 and PA01) and E. coli K-12 were pre-cultured in 3 mL of 20 g/L Luria–Bertani broth (LB, Serva Electrophoresis GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) under aerobic conditions (37 °C, 220 rpm shaking) overnight, followed by 100-fold dilution in 10 mL of LB, and further incubation under aerobic conditions (37 °C, 200 rpm shaking) to an OD595 of ~0.4 (approximately 108 CFU/mL). Optical densities were measured using Varioskan Flash Multimode Plate Reader operated with SkanIt RE for Varioskan Flash 2.4.3 software (Thermo Scientific Oy (Vantaa, Finland), and CFUs were confirmed by serial dilution of cultures and plating on tryptic soy agar (TSA, Fluka Biochemika, Buchs, Switzerland) (C. violaceum) and Luria–Bertani (LB) agar Miller (Fisher Scientific, Leicestershire, UK) (P. aeruginosa and E. coli).

3.3. Screening for Quorum Sensing Inhibitors (QSIs)

The initial screening of compound library was conducted using two strains of C. violaceum as model bacterium, and two assays (violacein extraction and resazurin staining) in parallel as recently optimized in [26]. For the screening assays, overnight cultures of C. violaceum were diluted in LB broth supplemented with yeast extract (LBY) (0.1% w/v, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Culture of C. violaceum CV026 was further supplemented with 0.5 µM N-(β-ketocaproyl)-l-Homoserine lactone (3-O-C6-(l)-HSL, Cayman chemicals, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) to induce the violacein production. Bacteria (106 CFU/mL) was exposed to compounds (400 µM) in a total volume of 200 µL in 96-microtiter well plates (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark), and incubated at 27 °C, with shaking at 200 rpm for 24 h. DMSO was added in untreated control wells and bacteria-free wells with only LBY were included controls. Additionally, autoinducer-free wells containing only bacteria were included in C. violaceum CV026 plates. Plates were prepared in duplicates. Quercetin dihydrate (Carl Roth GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) at 400 µM was used as positive control in violacein extraction assay, and azithromycin (Cayman chemicals, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) at 10 µM in viability assay. Both control compounds were prepared in DMSO. DMSO concentration was 2.5% throughout the experiments.

3.3.1. Violacein Extraction

After incubation period of 24 h, plates were centrifuged (Allegra™ X-12R Benchtop centrifuge, Beckman Coulter Inc., Fullerton, CA, USA) at 3000 rpm for 10 min to precipitate the violacein. Supernatants were discarded from the wells by pipetting, and pellets were re-suspended in 200 μL of 96% ethanol by scraping and mixing followed by centrifugation (3000 rpm, 10 min). Thereafter, 100 μL of supernatants were transferred to sterile 96-microtiter well plates, and violacein was quantified by reading the optical density at 595 nm using Varioskan Flash. Inhibition of violacein production was expressed as inhibition percentages of the untreated biofilms (Equation (1)):
Inhibition-% = [(untreated control OD595 − sample OD595)/(untreated control OD595 − media control OD595)] × 100%
in which untreated control = C. violaceum + DMSO, media control = LBY, and sample = C. violaceum treated with a compound. Later on, violacein extraction assay was also utilized for the determination of half inhibitory concentrations of the compounds.

3.3.2. Resazurin Staining Assay

Effects of the compounds on bacterial viability were quantified using resazurin staining assay. After the 24 h incubation, plates were centrifuged (3000 rpm, 10 min) and the supernatants were removed from the wells using multichannel pipette. Resazurin solution (20 µM) prepared in phosphate buffered saline (PBS, Lonza, Viewers, Bornem, Belgium) was added to the wells (200 μL per well), and plates were incubated in darkness, at room temperature (RT) with shaking at 200 rpm for 45 min. Fluorescence (λexc = 560 nm; λem = 590 nm) was read using Varioskan Flash. Bactericidal activity of the compounds was assessed as inhibition percentage of biofilm viability (Equation (2)):
Inhibition-% = [(untreated control − sample)/(untreated control − media control)] × 100%

3.4. Crystal Violet Staining Assay

Crystal violet-based biomass staining assay was performed to assess the effects of the compounds on the transition from microcolonies to fully formed as recently described in [26] with minor modifications. Briefly, diluted cultures of exponentially grown P. aeruginosa ATCC 9027, ATCC 15442 and PA01, and E. coli K-12 (106 CFU/mL) were added to the 96-microtiter well plates (200 µL per well) to form microcolonies for two hours (37 °C). At the end of this period, bacterial suspensions were removed, compounds at a final concentration of 400 µM and fresh LB media were added, and plates were incubated at 37 °C, with shaking (200 rpm) for additional 22 h. After the incubation period, media was discarded and the biofilms were washed once with sterile Milli-Q (MQ)-water. Biomass was fixed with methanol for 15 min followed by staining with 0.23% (v/v) crystal violet (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany) solution prepared in MQ-water (200 µL per well) for 5 min. Thereafter, wells were washed twice with MQ-water and 200 µL of 96% ethanol was added to the wells. Absorbance was measured at 595 nm using Varioskan Flash after 1 h.

3.5. Transmitted Light Microscopy

For imaging, bacteria were allowed to adhere and form microcolonies on coverslips. Briefly, 5 mL of diluted cultures (106 CFU/mL) of P. aeruginosa and E. coli was added to 6-well plates containing glass coverslips (22 mm × 22 mm). The plates were incubated at 37 °C without shaking for 2 h. Thereafter, bacterial suspensions were removed, and the wells were washed once with PBS. Fresh LB with and without the lead compounds at a final concentration of 100 µM was added to the wells, and the plates were incubated at 37 °C for 22 h. At the end of 24 h, coverslips were rinsed three times with MQ-water and air dried followed by staining with 0.23% (v/v) crystal violet solution. Coverslips were allowed to dry and visualized under a Transmitted Light Microscope (EVOS® XL Imaging System, InvitrogenTM, Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) at a magnification of 40×.

3.6. Swarming and Swimming Motility Assays

Assays were performed according to the protocols previously described in [30,74] with some modifications. The swarming agar was prepared in MQ-water consisting of 0.3% (w/v) agar, 1% (w/v) peptone, 0.5% (w/v) yeast extract and 0.5% (w/v) sodium chloride, and the swimming agar similarly but without yeast extract. Compounds at a final concentration of 400 µM and 100 µM were pre-mixed with 5 mL of agar, and poured over solidified LB agar plates (10 mL/petri dish) as overlays. The plates were allowed to dry at 30 °C for three hours followed by point inoculation with 2 µL of P. aeruginosa PAO1 (~108 CFU/mL) and incubation at 37 °C for 18 h. Quercetin was used as a control. Diameters of the swarming and swimming zones were measured after the incubation periods.

3.7. Viable Plate Counts

Effects of the leads on bacterial growth were assessed by performing viable plate counts. Compounds at final concentrations of 100 and 400 µM and cultures of P. aeruginosa (ATCC 9027, ATCC 15422 and PA01) and E. coli K-12 (106 CFU/mL) were simultaneously added to the 96-microtiter well plates (200 µL per well). Untreated bacteria were included in control wells. The plates were incubated at 37 °C, without shaking for 24 h. At the end of this period, bacterial suspensions were transferred from the wells to Eppendorf tubes, and the tubes were sonicated for 10 min (25 °C, 35 kHz, Sonorex Digitec water bath (Bandelin, Zurich, Switzerland)). Each suspension was serially diluted in LB and plated on LB agar. The number of viable bacteria in each test concentration was counted after overnight incubation at 37 °C. Results were expressed as CFU/mL.

3.8. Cytotoxicity Testing

Human lung (HL) epithelial cells [75] were grown in RPMI 1640 (Biowhittaker, Lonza, Viewers, Bornem, Belgium) supplemented with 10% inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2 mM l-glutamine and gentamycin 20 µg/mL, and mouse monocyte macrophage RAW 264.7 cells in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% FBS and 20 µg/mL gentamycin. Cells (3 × 105 cells/mL) were seeded into 96-microtiter well plates (Cellstar TC, Greiner Bio-One GmbH, Frickenhausen, Germany), 200 µL per well, and incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2 24 h before exposure to the compounds. After the incubation, culture medium was discarded, the wells were washed with PBS, and the compound dilutions prepared in culture media were added as triplicates to a final volume of 200 µL. Usnic acid (200 µM, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was included as positive control and DMSO (1%) as solvent control. Plates were incubated for additional 24 h. At the end of 24 h, media was removed, wells were washed twice with PBS and 100 µL of PBS was added. CellTiter Glo® reagent (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) was prepared according to manufacturer’s instructions, and 100 µL was added to the wells. The plates were shaken for two minutes and equilibrated at room temperature for 10 min prior to measuring the luminescence using Varioskan LUX multimode plate reader (Thermo Scientific, Vantaa, Finland). Inhibition of cell viability was calculated in relation to the untreated cells.

3.9. Statistical Analysis

Statistical parameters signal-to-noise (S/N), signal-to-background (S/B) and Z′ values were calculated to monitor the assay performance. Unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction was used to assess the significance using GraphPad Prism v. 7.0 software (GraphPad software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. During the primary screening, compounds were tested as single well compounds, while in follow-up studies, compounds were tested in three technical replicates, three times. The IC50 values were calculated from 15 concentration points by non-linear regression analysis (sigmoidal dose-response fitting with variable slope) using GraphPad Prism.

4. Conclusions

The study demonstrates feasibility of the previously optimized screening platform as an efficient tool for the identification of naturally inspired QSIs against Gram-negative bacteria. It identified several structurally different, highly active QSIs against C. violaceum. In addition to violacein inhibition, the follow-up studies revealed that the selected lead compounds interfered with other QS-mediated functions, namely, biofilm maturation and motility of other Gram-negative species (P. aeruginosa and E. coli) without inhibiting the growth. The selected leads reduced the transition from microcolonies to fully formed biofilms to a varying extent in E. coli and P. aeruginosa, and significantly inhibited swimming and swarming motilities of P. aeruginosa. These findings indicate broad-spectrum anti-QS activity. The leads were able to affect biofilm lifecycle at different stages of development, which further emphasizes the potential of the leads to be used as adjunctive agents with conventional antibiotics. Further studies with these compounds could include determination of the effects on biofilm dispersal and virulence factors production, as well as combinatory testing with conventional antibiotics. Moreover, these results suggest that the lead compounds may serve as inspiring scaffolds for further optimization towards more efficient, non-toxic QSIs to control Gram-negative bacteria.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/19/5/1346/s1.

Author Contributions

A.F. conceived the study, S.M. designed and performed the experiments. The data were analyzed and the manuscript was written by S.M. and revised by A.F. Both authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

Financial support for the work was provided by the Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation (granted to A.F.), Academy of Finland (grant number 272266) and Abo Akademi University.

Acknowledgments

Krista Virtanen (University of Helsinki) is acknowledged for practical help for cytotoxicity testing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

QSQuorum sensing
QSIQuorum sensing inhibitor
AHLN-acyl-l-homoserine lactone
AIAutoinducer
HSLHomoserine lactone
QQQuorum quencher
LBYLuria–Bertani broth supplemented with yeast extract
QUEQuercetin

References

  1. Percival, S.L.; Suleman, L.; Vuotto, C.; Donelli, G. Healthcare-associated infections, medical devices and biofilms: Risk, tolerance and control. J. Med. Microbiol. 2015, 64, 323–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lebeaux, D.; Ghigo, J.M.; Beloin, C. Biofilm-related infections: Bridging the gap between clinical management and fundamental aspects of recalcitrance toward antibiotics. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2014, 78, 510–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. González, J.E.; Keshavan, N.D. Messing with bacterial quorum sensing. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2006, 70, 859–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Waters, C.M.; Bassler, B.L. Quorum sensing: Cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2005, 21, 319–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. McDougald, D.; Rice, S.A.; Kjelleberg, S. Bacterial quorum sensing and interference by naturally occurring biomimics. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2007, 387, 445–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Rutherford, S.T.; Bassler, B.L. Bacterial quorum sensing: Its role in virulence and possibilities for its control. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2012, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Fuqua, C.; Winans, S.C.; Greenberg, E.P. Census and consensus in bacterial ecosystems: The LuxR-LuxI family of quorum-sensing transcriptional regulators. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1996, 50, 727–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Miller, M.B.; Bassler, B.L. Quorum sensing in bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2001, 55, 165–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. De Kievit, T.R.; Gillis, R.; Marx, S.; Brown, C.; Iglewski, B.H. Quorum-sensing genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms: Their role and expression patterns. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 1865–1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Geske, G.D.; O’Neill, J.C.; Blackwell, H.E. Expanding dialogues: From natural autoinducers to non-natural analogues that modulate quorum sensing in gram-negative bacteria. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 1432–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Brackman, G.; Coenye, T. Quorum sensing inhibitors as anti-biofilm agents. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2015, 21, 5–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hentzer, M.; Wu, H.; Andersen, J.B.; Riedel, K.; Rasmussen, T.B.; Bagge, N.; Kumar, N.; Schembri, M.A.; Song, Z.; Kristoffersen, P.; et al. Attenuation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence by quorum sensing inhibitors. EMBO J. 2003, 22, 3803–3815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Rasmussen, T.B.; Givskov, M. Quorum-sensing inhibitors as anti-pathogenic drugs. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2006, 296, 149–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sperandio, V. Novel approaches to bacterial infection therapy by interfering with bacteria-to-bacteria signaling. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2007, 5, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Cragg, G.M.; Newman, D.J. Natural products: A continuing source of novel drug leads. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1830, 3670–3695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kalia, V.C. Quorum sensing inhibitors: An overview. Biotechnol. Adv. 2013, 31, 224–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Nazzaro, F.; Fratianni, F.; Coppola, R. Quorum sensing and phytochemicals. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 12607–12619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Givskov, M.; de Nys, R.; Manefield, M.; Gram, L.; Maximilien, R.; Eberl, L.; Molin, S.; Steinberg, P.D.; Kjelleberg, S. Eukaryotic interference with homoserine lactone-mediated prokaryotic signalling. J. Bacteriol. 1996, 178, 6618–6622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Manefield, M.; de Nys, R.; Kumar, N.; Read, R.; Givskov, M.; Steinberg, P.; Kjelleberg, S. Evidence that halogenated furanones from Delisea pulchra inhibit acylated homoserine lactone (AHL)-mediated gene expression by displacing the AHL signal from its receptor protein. Microbiology 1999, 145 (Pt 2), 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Manefield, M.; Rasmussen, T.B.; Henzter, M.; Andersen, J.B.; Steinberg, P.; Kjelleberg, S.; Givskov, M. Halogenated furanones inhibit quorum sensing through accelerated LuxR turnover. Microbiology 2002, 148, 1119–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Vermote, A.; Brackman, G.; Risseeuw, M.D.; Coenye, T.; van Calenbergh, S. Novel hamamelitannin analogues for the treatment of biofilm related MRSA infections—A scaffold hopping approach. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 127, 757–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Brackman, G.; Celen, S.; Hillaert, U.; van Calenbergh, S.; Cos, P.; Maes, L.; Nelis, H.J.; Coenye, T. Structure-activity relationship of cinnamaldehyde analogs as inhibitors of AI-2 based quorum sensing and their effect on virulence of Vibrio spp. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e16084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Jakobsen, T.H.; Bragason, S.K.; Phipps, R.K.; Christensen, L.D.; van Gennip, M.; Alhede, M.; Skindersoe, M.; Larsen, T.O.; Høiby, N.; Bjarnsholt, T.; et al. Food as a source for quorum sensing inhibitors: Iberin from horseradish revealed as a quorum sensing inhibitor of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 2410–2421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Jakobsen, T.H.; van Gennip, M.; Phipps, R.K.; Shanmugham, M.S.; Christensen, L.D.; Alhede, M.; Skindersoe, M.E.; Rasmussen, T.B.; Friedrich, K.; Uthe, F.; et al. Ajoene, a sulfur-rich molecule from garlic, inhibits genes controlled by quorum sensing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 2314–2325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Annapoorani, A.; Umamageswaran, V.; Parameswari, R.; Pandian, S.K.; Ravi, A.V. Computational discovery of putative quorum sensing inhibitors against LasR and RhlR receptor proteins of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2012, 26, 1067–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Skogman, M.E.; Kanerva, S.; Manner, S.; Vuorela, P.M.; Fallarero, A. Flavones as quorum sensing inhibitors identified by a newly optimized screening platform using Chromobacterium violaceum as reporter bacteria. Molecules 2016, 21, 1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. McClean, K.H.; Winson, M.K.; Fish, L.; Taylor, A.; Chhabra, S.R.; Camara, M.; Daykin, M.; Lamb, J.H.; Swift, S.; Bycroft, B.W.; et al. Quorum sensing and Chromobacterium violaceum: Exploitation of violacein production and inhibition for the detection of N-acylhomoserine lactones. Microbiology 1997, 143 (Pt 12), 3703–3711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Burt, S.A.; Ojo-Fakunle, V.T.; Woertman, J.; Veldhuizen, E.J. The natural antimicrobial carvacrol inhibits quorum sensing in Chromobacterium violaceum and reduces bacterial biofilm formation at sub-lethal concentrations. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e93414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Choo, J.H.; Rukayadi, Y.; Hwang, J.K. Inhibition of bacterial quorum sensing by vanilla extract. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2006, 42, 637–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Yin, H.; Deng, Y.; Wang, H.; Liu, W.; Zhuang, X.; Chu, W. Tea polyphenols as an antivirulence compound disrupt quorum-sensing regulated pathogenicity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 16158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Vattem, D.A.; Mihalik, K.; Crixell, S.H.; McLean, R.J. Dietary phytochemicals as quorum sensing inhibitors. Fitoterapia 2007, 78, 302–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Taganna, J.C.; Quanico, J.P.; Perono, R.M.; Amor, E.C.; Rivera, W.L. Tannin-rich fraction from Terminalia catappa inhibits quorum sensing (QS) in Chromobacterium violaceum and the QS-controlled biofilm maturation and LasA staphylolytic activity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2011, 134, 865–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Sethupathy, S.; Nithya, C.; Pandian, S.K. 2-furaldehyde diethyl acetal from tender coconut water (Cocos nucifera) attenuates biofilm formation and quorum sensing-mediated virulence of Chromobacterium violaceum and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biofouling 2015, 31, 721–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Manner, S.; Skogman, M.; Goeres, D.; Vuorela, P.; Fallarero, A. Systematic exploration of natural and synthetic flavonoids for the inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 19434–19451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Havsteen, B.H. The biochemistry and medical significance of the flavonoids. Pharmacol. Ther. 2002, 96, 67–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cushnie, T.P.; Lamb, A.J. Antimicrobial activity of flavonoids. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2005, 26, 343–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Vasavi, H.S.; Arun, A.B.; Rekha, P.D. Anti-quorum sensing activity of Psidium guajava L. flavonoids against Chromobacterium violaceum and Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Microbiol. Immunol. 2014, 58, 286–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Rekha, P.D.; Vasavi, H.S.; Vipin, C.; Saptami, K.; Arun, A.B. A medicinal herb Cassia alata attenuates quorum sensing in Chromobacterium violaceum and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 64, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Gopu, V.; Meena, C.K.; Shetty, P.H. Quercetin influences quorum sensing in food borne bacteria: In-vitro and in-silico evidence. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0134684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Truchado, P.; Giménez-Bastida, J.A.; Larrosa, M.; Castro-Ibáñez, I.; Espín, J.C.; Tomás-Barberán, F.A.; García-Conesa, M.T.; Allende, A. Inhibition of quorum sensing (QS) in Yersinia enterocolitica by an orange extract rich in glycosylated flavanones. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 8885–8894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Vandeputte, O.M.; Kiendrebeogo, M.; Rasamiravaka, T.; Stévigny, C.; Duez, P.; Rajaonson, S.; Diallo, B.; Mol, A.; Baucher, M.; El Jaziri, M. The flavanone naringenin reduces the production of quorum sensing-controlled virulence factors in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Microbiology 2011, 157, 2120–2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Vandeputte, O.M.; Kiendrebeogo, M.; Rajaonson, S.; Diallo, B.; Mol, A.; El Jaziri, M.; Baucher, M. Identification of catechin as one of the flavonoids from Combretum albiflorum bark extract that reduces the production of quorum-sensing-controlled virulence factors in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 243–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Borges, A.; Serra, S.; Cristina Abreu, A.; Saavedra, M.J.; Salgado, A.; Simões, M. Evaluation of the effects of selected phytochemicals on quorum sensing inhibition and in vitro cytotoxicity. Biofouling 2014, 30, 183–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kim, Y.S.; Ryu, Y.B.; Curtis-Long, M.J.; Yuk, H.J.; Cho, J.K.; Kim, J.Y.; Kim, K.D.; Lee, W.S.; Park, K.H. Flavanones and rotenoids from the roots of Amorpha fruticosa L. that inhibit bacterial neuraminidase. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2011, 49, 1849–1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Brackman, G.; Celen, S.; Baruah, K.; Bossier, P.; van Calenbergh, S.; Nelis, H.J.; Coenye, T. Ai-2 quorum-sensing inhibitors affect the starvation response and reduce virulence in several Vibrio species, most likely by interfering with LuxPQ. Microbiology 2009, 155, 4114–4122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Bodini, S.F.; Manfredini, S.; Epp, M.; Valentini, S.; Santori, F. Quorum sensing inhibition activity of garlic extract and p-coumaric acid. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 49, 551–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Skindersoe, M.E.; Alhede, M.; Phipps, R.; Yang, L.; Jensen, P.O.; Rasmussen, T.B.; Bjarnsholt, T.; Tolker-Nielsen, T.; Høiby, N.; Givskov, M. Effects of antibiotics on quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008, 52, 3648–3663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Hwang, J.H.; Choi, H.; Hwang, I.S.; Kim, A.R.; Woo, E.R.; Lee, D.G. Synergistic antibacterial and antibiofilm effect between (+)-medioresinol and antibiotics in vitro. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2013, 170, 1934–1941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Monte, J.; Abreu, A.C.; Borges, A.; Simões, L.C.; Simões, M. Antimicrobial activity of selected phytochemicals against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus and their biofilms. Pathogens 2014, 3, 473–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Hidalgo-Romano, B.; Gollihar, J.; Brown, S.A.; Whiteley, M.; Valenzuela, E.; Kaplan, H.B.; Wood, T.K.; McLean, R.J. Indole inhibition of N-acylated homoserine lactone-mediated quorum signalling is widespread in gram-negative bacteria. Microbiology 2014, 160, 2464–2473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. More, P.G.; Karale, N.N.; Lawand, A.S.; Rajmane, S.V.; Pawar, S.V.; Patil, R.H. A 4-(o-methoxyphenyl)-2-aminothiazole: An anti-quorum sensing compound. Med. Chem. Res. 2012, 22, 4183–4191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cho, H.S.; Lee, J.H.; Cho, M.H.; Lee, J. Red wines and flavonoids diminish Staphylococcus aureus virulence with anti-biofilm and anti-hemolytic activities. Biofouling 2015, 31, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Lee, J.H.; Regmi, S.C.; Kim, J.A.; Cho, M.H.; Yun, H.; Lee, C.S.; Lee, J. Apple flavonoid phloretin inhibits Escherichia coli O157:H7 biofilm formation and ameliorates colon inflammation in rats. Infect. Immun. 2011, 79, 4819–4827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Shen, X.F.; Ren, L.B.; Teng, Y.; Zheng, S.; Yang, X.L.; Guo, X.J.; Wang, X.Y.; Sha, K.H.; Li, N.; Xu, G.Y.; et al. Luteolin decreases the attachment, invasion and cytotoxicity of UPEC in bladder epithelial cells and inhibits UPEC biofilm formation. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2014, 72, 204–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Durán, N.; Justo, G.Z.; Durán, M.; Brocchi, M.; Cordi, L.; Tasic, L.; Castro, G.R.; Nakazato, G. Advances in Chromobacterium violaceum and properties of violacein-its main secondary metabolite: A review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2016, 34, 1030–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. National Center for Biotechnology Information. PubChem BioAssay Database. Available online: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioassay/924 (accessed on 28 March 2018).
  57. Kwan, J.C.; Meickle, T.; Ladwa, D.; Teplitski, M.; Paul, V.; Luesch, H. Lyngbyoic acid, a “tagged” fatty acid from a marine cyanobacterium, disrupts quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol. Biosyst. 2011, 7, 1205–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Davies, D.G.; Marques, C.N. A fatty acid messenger is responsible for inducing dispersion in microbial biofilms. J. Bacteriol. 2009, 191, 1393–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Morohoshi, T.; Kato, M.; Fukamachi, K.; Kato, N.; Ikeda, T. N-acylhomoserine lactone regulates violacein production in Chromobacterium violaceum type strain ATCC 12472. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2008, 279, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Dickschat, J.S. Quorum sensing and bacterial biofilms. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2010, 27, 343–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Smith, R.S.; Iglewski, B.H. P. aeruginosa quorum-sensing systems and virulence. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2003, 6, 56–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ahmer, B.M. Cell-to-cell signalling in Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica. Mol. Microbiol. 2004, 52, 933–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Rasmussen, T.B.; Bjarnsholt, T.; Skindersoe, M.E.; Hentzer, M.; Kristoffersen, P.; Köte, M.; Nielsen, J.; Eberl, L.; Givskov, M. Screening for quorum-sensing inhibitors (QSI) by use of a novel genetic system, the QSI selector. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 1799–1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Hentzer, M.; Riedel, K.; Rasmussen, T.B.; Heydorn, A.; Andersen, J.B.; Parsek, M.R.; Rice, S.A.; Eberl, L.; Molin, S.; Høiby, N.; et al. Inhibition of quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm bacteria by a halogenated furanone compound. Microbiology 2002, 148, 87–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Brackman, G.; Cos, P.; Maes, L.; Nelis, H.J.; Coenye, T. Quorum sensing inhibitors increase the susceptibility of bacterial biofilms to antibiotics in vitro and in vivo. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 2655–2661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Shrout, J.D.; Chopp, D.L.; Just, C.L.; Hentzer, M.; Givskov, M.; Parsek, M.R. The impact of quorum sensing and swarming motility on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation is nutritionally conditional. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 62, 1264–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. De la Fuente-Núñez, C.; Korolik, V.; Bains, M.; Nguyen, U.; Breidenstein, E.B.; Horsman, S.; Lewenza, S.; Burrows, L.; Hancock, R.E. Inhibition of bacterial biofilm formation and swarming motility by a small synthetic cationic peptide. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 2696–2704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Pratt, L.A.; Kolter, R. Genetic analysis of Escherichia coli biofilm formation: Roles of flagella, motility, chemotaxis and type I pili. Mol. Microbiol. 1998, 30, 285–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Das, A.; Das, M.C.; Sandhu, P.; Das, N.; Tribedi, P.; De, U.C.; Akhterb, Y.; Bhattacharjee, S. Antibiofilm activity of Parkia javanica against Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A study with fruit extract. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 5497–5513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. O’May, C.; Tufenkji, N. The swarming motility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is blocked by cranberry proanthocyanidins and other tannin-containing materials. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 3061–3067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Inoue, T.; Shingaki, R.; Fukui, K. Inhibition of swarming motility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by branched-chain fatty acids. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2008, 281, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Caiazza, N.C.; Shanks, R.M.; O’Toole, G.A. Rhamnolipids modulate swarming motility patterns of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 7351–7361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Manner, S.; Fallarero, A.; Abo Akademi University and University of Helsinki, Finland. Evaluation of the Effects of the Leads in Rhamnolipid Biosynthesis. Personal communication, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  74. Issac Abraham, S.V.; Palani, A.; Ramaswamy, B.R.; Shunmugiah, K.P.; Arumugam, V.R. Antiquorum sensing and antibiofilm potential of Capparis spinosa. Arch. Med. Res. 2011, 42, 658–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Kuo, C.C.; Grayston, J.T. A sensitive cell line, HL cells, for isolation and propagation of Chlamydia pneumoniae strain TWAR. J. Infect. Dis. 1990, 162, 755–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 19 01346 g001 550
Figure 1. Screening for quorum sensing inhibitors. QSI = quorum sensing inhibitor, QQ = quorum quencher, AI = autoinducer, LBY = Luria–Bertani broth supplemented with yeast extract.
Figure 1. Screening for quorum sensing inhibitors. QSI = quorum sensing inhibitor, QQ = quorum quencher, AI = autoinducer, LBY = Luria–Bertani broth supplemented with yeast extract.
Ijms 19 01346 g001
Ijms 19 01346 g002 550
Figure 2. Inhibition of violacein production in C. violaceum ATCC 31532 and CV026 by the non-bactericidal compounds identified in primary screening (n = 2399). Highly active QSIs are marked with black triangles and QQs with black diamonds. Complete results of the primary screening are presented in Table S2. The red lines indicate the thresholds of 90% inhibition of violacein production, which were set to identify the highly active inhibitors from the rest of the screened compounds.
Figure 2. Inhibition of violacein production in C. violaceum ATCC 31532 and CV026 by the non-bactericidal compounds identified in primary screening (n = 2399). Highly active QSIs are marked with black triangles and QQs with black diamonds. Complete results of the primary screening are presented in Table S2. The red lines indicate the thresholds of 90% inhibition of violacein production, which were set to identify the highly active inhibitors from the rest of the screened compounds.
Ijms 19 01346 g002
Ijms 19 01346 g003 550
Figure 3. Structures of the highly active QSIs identified in the primary screening. The structures are drawn using ACD/ChemSketch software. The IUPAC names of the compounds are listed in Table S4.
Figure 3. Structures of the highly active QSIs identified in the primary screening. The structures are drawn using ACD/ChemSketch software. The IUPAC names of the compounds are listed in Table S4.
Ijms 19 01346 g003
Ijms 19 01346 g004 550
Figure 4. Structures of the lead compounds 2117 (A) and 2896 (B), N-hexanoyl-l-homoserine lactone (C6-HSL) (C), and autoinducer, N-(β-ketocaproyl)-l-homoserine used for C. violaceum CV026 cultures (D). The structures are drawn using ACD/ChemSketch software.
Figure 4. Structures of the lead compounds 2117 (A) and 2896 (B), N-hexanoyl-l-homoserine lactone (C6-HSL) (C), and autoinducer, N-(β-ketocaproyl)-l-homoserine used for C. violaceum CV026 cultures (D). The structures are drawn using ACD/ChemSketch software.
Ijms 19 01346 g004
Ijms 19 01346 g005 550
Figure 5. Transmitted light microscopy images of P. aeruginosa and E. coli biofilms grown in the absence and presence of the lead compounds. Biofilms are stained with crystal violet and visualized at a magnification of 40×. Scale bars correspond to 100 µm.
Figure 5. Transmitted light microscopy images of P. aeruginosa and E. coli biofilms grown in the absence and presence of the lead compounds. Biofilms are stained with crystal violet and visualized at a magnification of 40×. Scale bars correspond to 100 µm.
Ijms 19 01346 g005
Ijms 19 01346 g006 550
Figure 6. Inhibition of swarming (a) and swimming (b) motility of P. aeruginosa PAO1 by the lead compounds. In both panels, (A–C) untreated P. aeruginosa PAO1, (D–F) P. aeruginosa PAO1 treated with quercetin, 2117 and 2896 at 100 µM, and (G–I) P. aeruginosa PAO1 treated with quercetin, 2117 and 2896 at 400 µM, respectively. Results are shown as mean ± SD of three (swarming) and four (swimming) independent experiments. Statistical differences are marked in the Figure as: * p < 0.05; ** 0.001 < p < 0.05 and *** p < 0.001).
Figure 6. Inhibition of swarming (a) and swimming (b) motility of P. aeruginosa PAO1 by the lead compounds. In both panels, (A–C) untreated P. aeruginosa PAO1, (D–F) P. aeruginosa PAO1 treated with quercetin, 2117 and 2896 at 100 µM, and (G–I) P. aeruginosa PAO1 treated with quercetin, 2117 and 2896 at 400 µM, respectively. Results are shown as mean ± SD of three (swarming) and four (swimming) independent experiments. Statistical differences are marked in the Figure as: * p < 0.05; ** 0.001 < p < 0.05 and *** p < 0.001).
Ijms 19 01346 g006
Table
Table 1. Inhibition-% of violacein production by the identified highly active compounds in the primary screening.
Table 1. Inhibition-% of violacein production by the identified highly active compounds in the primary screening.
CompoundCompound IDATCC 31532CV026Class
144ST01239194.797.2Nucleoside analogue
339ST02477695.694.7N/A, a mixture of two compounds *
341ST02478493.495.2Flavonoid (isoflavonoid)
575ST04541494.194.3Flavonoid (flavonol)
916ST069294101.995.7Flavonoid (flavone)
1698ST07711791.396.1Lignan
2117ST083092101.8101.9Flavonoid (flavone)
2307ST08852798.898.6Alkaloid
2896ST07996294.591.2Flavonoid (flavone)
* Penicillin G, salt with 4-[[2-(diethylamino)ethoxy]methyl]aniline; N/A = not applicable.
Table
Table 2. Inhibition-% of violacein production by the highly active compounds at 40 µM and IC50 values of the leads with 95% confidence intervals. Results are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three independent tests. N/A = not applicable, N.A. = not analyzed, Que = quercetin. The IUPAC names of the compounds are listed in Table S4.
Table 2. Inhibition-% of violacein production by the highly active compounds at 40 µM and IC50 values of the leads with 95% confidence intervals. Results are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three independent tests. N/A = not applicable, N.A. = not analyzed, Que = quercetin. The IUPAC names of the compounds are listed in Table S4.
CompoundClassInhibition-% 1IC50 (µM)95% Confidence Intervals
144Nucleoside analogue0 ± 5.2N.A.
339N/A3.7 ± 1.8N.A.
341Flavonoid (isoflavonoid)26.9 ± 7.7N.A.
575Flavonoid (flavonol)60.9 ± 4.1N.A.
916Flavonoid (flavone)35.8 ± 1.1N.A.
1698Lignan2.6 ± 4.6N.A.
2117Flavonoid (flavone)99.7 ± 1.09.67.9–11.8
2307Alkaloid76.1 ± 3.3N.A.
2896Flavonoid (flavone)83.5 ± 1.413.98.5–22.5
QueFlavonoid (flavonol)91.8 ± 2.33.12.1–4.5
1 Tested in C. violaceum ATCC 31532.
Table
Table 3. Inhibitory activity of the leads (at 400 µM) on the transition from microcolonies to fully formed biofilms as quantified using crystal violet staining assay. Results are reported as mean ± SD of three independent experiments.
Table 3. Inhibitory activity of the leads (at 400 µM) on the transition from microcolonies to fully formed biofilms as quantified using crystal violet staining assay. Results are reported as mean ± SD of three independent experiments.
Strain21172896
P. aeruginosa PAO142.3 ± 12.411.6 ± 11.1
P. aeruginosa ATCC 902727.2 ± 6.022.5 ± 3.2
P. aeruginosa ATCC 1542211.2 ± 1.828.1 ± 15.1
E. coli K-1251.3 ± 6.914.3 ± 10.1
Table
Table 4. Inhibition-% of cell viability after 24 h exposure to the lead compounds. Results are reported as mean ± SD, n = 3. N.I. = no inhibition. Cytotoxicity was tested in human lung (HL) epithelial cells and mouse monocyte macrophage (RAW 264.7) cells.
Table 4. Inhibition-% of cell viability after 24 h exposure to the lead compounds. Results are reported as mean ± SD, n = 3. N.I. = no inhibition. Cytotoxicity was tested in human lung (HL) epithelial cells and mouse monocyte macrophage (RAW 264.7) cells.
CompoundConcentrationHLRAW 264.7
2117100 µM11.2 ± 4.997.9 ± 0.5
2896 N.I.N.I.
211740 µMN.I.N.I.
2896 N.I.N.I.
211710 µMN.I.N.I.
2896 N.I.N.I.
Usnic acid200 µM90.0 ± 4.798.5 ± 0.6

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Manner, S.; Fallarero, A. Screening of Natural Product Derivatives Identifies Two Structurally Related Flavonoids as Potent Quorum Sensing Inhibitors against Gram-Negative Bacteria. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1346. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19051346

AMA Style

Manner S, Fallarero A. Screening of Natural Product Derivatives Identifies Two Structurally Related Flavonoids as Potent Quorum Sensing Inhibitors against Gram-Negative Bacteria. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018; 19(5):1346. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19051346

Chicago/Turabian Style

Manner, Suvi, and Adyary Fallarero. 2018. "Screening of Natural Product Derivatives Identifies Two Structurally Related Flavonoids as Potent Quorum Sensing Inhibitors against Gram-Negative Bacteria" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19, no. 5: 1346. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19051346

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop