Next Article in Journal
A Double-Edged Sword: The Role of VEGF in Wound Repair and Chemoattraction of Opportunist Pathogens
Next Article in Special Issue
Alternative Bio-Based Solvents for Extraction of Fat and Oils: Solubility Prediction, Global Yield, Extraction Kinetics, Chemical Composition and Cost of Manufacturing
Previous Article in Journal
Unfolding the Unfolded Protein Response: Unique Insights into Brain Ischemia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Protease and Hemicellulase Assisted Extraction of Dietary Fiber from Wastes of Cynara cardunculus
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 16
Issue 4
10.3390/ijms16047143
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Organocatalytic Upgrading of Furfural and 5-Hydroxymethyl Furfural to C10 and C12 Furoins with Quantitative Yield and Atom-Efficiency

by
Hongjun Zang
† and
Eugene Y. X. Chen
*
Department of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1872, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Current address: Department of Environment and Chemical Engineering, Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianjin 300387, China
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16(4), 7143-7158; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16047143
Submission received: 13 February 2015 / Revised: 25 March 2015 / Accepted: 26 March 2015 / Published: 30 March 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Green Chemistry and the Biorefinery)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
There is increasing interest in the upgrading of C5 furfural (FF) and C6 5-hydroxymethyl furfural (HMF) into C10 and C12 furoins as higher energy-density intermediates for renewable chemicals, materials, and biofuels. This work utilizes the organocatalytic approach, using the in situ generated N,S-heterocyclic carbene catalyst derived from thiazolium ionic liquids (ILs), to achieve highly efficient self-coupling reactions of FF and HMF. Specifically, variations of the thiazolium IL structure have led to the most active and efficient catalyst system of the current series, which is derived from a new thiazolium IL carrying the electron-donating acetate group at the 5-ring position. For FF coupling by this IL (0.1 mol %, 60 °C, 1 h), when combined with Et3N, furoin was obtained in >99% yield. A 97% yield of the C12 furoin was also achieved from the HMF coupling by this catalyst system (10 mol % loading, 120 °C, 3 h). On the other hand, the thiazolium IL bearing the electron-withdrawing group at the 5-ring position is the least active and efficient catalyst. The mechanistic aspects of the coupling reaction by the thiazolium catalyst system have also been examined and a mechanism has been proposed.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Biofuran aldehydes (or furaldehydes), particularly furfural (FF) and 5-hydroxymethyl furfural (HMF) [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11], which are primarily derived from dehydration of C5 and C6 (poly)sugars, have emerged as two key renewable biomass building blocks for biorefining towards addressing global challenges to develop technologically and economically feasible routes for converting nonfood lignocellulosic biomass into feedstock chemicals, sustainable materials, and liquid fuels [12,13,14,15,16,17]. However, such C5 and C6 furaldehydes lead to, upon upgrading, relatively low carbon-number and low energy-density bio-products or fuels. Hence, there is increasing interest in upgrading of FF and HMF into higher molecular weight and higher energy-density kerosene/jet (C8 to C16) or diesel (up to C22) intermediates or fuels. This upgrading can be accomplished by chain extension involving new C–C bond formation through coupling with other organic compounds [18,19,20,21]. Considering the fact that such furaldehydes cannot undergo self-aldol condensation due to lack of α-hydrogen, Dumesic and co-workers utilized cross-aldol condensation of HMF with enolizable organic compounds such as acetone in the presence of an alkaline catalyst, followed by hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) processes, to upgrade HMF into C9 to C15 liquid alkane fuels [22]. Alternatively, opening the furan rings first under mild conditions, followed by HDO, produced alkanes more selectively [23]. Direct (reductive) coupling of two FF molecules by metal catalysts has also been utilized, leading to formation of Pinacol coupling products as a mixture of C10 alcohols, which can be subsequently converted into C8–14 linear and branched alkanes via the HDO process [24].
Departing from the widely employed metal-based catalyst systems, the application of organocatalysis in biomass conversion and upgrading into sustainable chemicals, materials, and biofuels has come to light recently [25]. The organocatalytic approach employs small-molecular organic compounds as efficient metal-free “greener” catalysts to promote catalytic chemical transformations [26,27,28,29,30,31,32], showing potentials of using relatively non- or less toxic, more environmentally benign, atom-economical and more sustainable organocatalysis for biorefining [25,33,34,35]. For instance, we recently found that a room-temperature ionic liquid (IL), 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate ([EMIM]OAc), can readily couple (or dimerize) two HMF molecules together to form C12 5,5'-dihydroxymethyl furoin (DHMF) in high conversion and selectivity [36]. The true catalyst for this coupling reaction was uncovered to be the N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC), 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazol-2-ylidene, which exists in an equilibrium with [EMIM]OAc and is stabilized by HOAc. Understanding of the coupling mechanism and catalytically active specie responsible for the [EMIM]OAc-promoted HMF self-coupling led to a much more effective HMF upgrading process; thus, use of a discrete, stable NHC, 1,3,4-triphenyl-4,5-dihydro-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-ylidene (TPT) [37,38], afforded DHMF with a quantitative selectivity and nearly quantitative isolated yield, with 1 mol % of TPT in a solvent-free process at 60 °C for 1 h [33]. The mechanism of this NHC-catalyzed direct coupling of HMF is outlined in Scheme 1, which resembles that for the NHC-catalyzed benzoin condensation reaction (vide infra). Significantly, as a higher energy-density C12 fuel intermediate, DHMF has been converted to oxygenated diesels by hydrogenation, etherification and esterification, as well as to high-quality alkane fuels; the latter transformation was achieved by the HDO process in water catalyzed by Pt/C and TaOPO4, which converted DHMF to linear hydrocarbons, with 96% selectivity to C10–12 linear alkanes: 27.0% n-decane, 22.9% n-undecane, and 45.6% n-dodecane [33].
Ijms 16 07143 g006 1024
Scheme 1. Solvent-free NHC-catalyzed self-condensation of HMF to DHMF and depicted umpolung coupling catalytic cycle.
Scheme 1. Solvent-free NHC-catalyzed self-condensation of HMF to DHMF and depicted umpolung coupling catalytic cycle.
Ijms 16 07143 g006
ILs exhibit the unique ability to dissolve lignocellulosic biomass [39,40] and related carbohydrates [41,42] under relatively mild conditions; this feature, plus several other concurrent advantages (e.g., as designable and recyclable solvents with low volatility and toxicity), has attracted much interest [43,44,45], particularly in the pursuit of renewable energy and sustainable chemicals from plant biomass [46,47]. Pertinent to the organocatalytic upgrading of furaldehydes, ILs are also precursors to the NHC catalysts that can efficiently promote benzoin condensation, a direct coupling reaction between two aldehydes [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,48]. Scheme 2 outlines the mechanism for the NHC-catalyzed benzoin condensation of benzaldehyde originally proposed by Breslow [49,50,51]. In this mechanism, thiazolium salt A is deprotonated by a strong base (e.g., Et3N) to form thiazolin-2-ylidene NHC catalyst B. Nucleophilic attack of the aldehyde by B generates the carbene-aldehyde zwitterionic adduct C, followed by subsequent protonation/deprotonation or proton transfer, which affords the Breslow intermediate, D. This amino enol intermediate functions as an acyl anion equivalent and attacks a second aldehyde, forming zwitterionic adduct E [49,50,51]. After the proton transfer and the elimination of the benzoin product, the NHC catalyst B is regenerated. This process is also termed aldehyde umpolung (polarity inversion) that converts the electrophilic carbonyl carbon to a nucleophilic center as an acyl anion equivalent. As for the biomass-derived furaldehydes, benzoin condensation of FF is catalyzed by NHCs in a similar fashion [52,53,54]. For example, the methanol adduct of TPT, TPT(MeOH), was used to catalyze condensation of FF to give furoin in 78% yield [55]. On the other hand, 3-benzyl-5-(2-hydroxyethyl)-4-methylthiazolium bromide, HO[TM]Br, in combination with Et3N, was employed for benzoin condensation of FF, achieving 90% yield of furoin [56].
To explore inexpensive alternatives to the discrete NHC catalysts such as TPT for furaldehyde umpolung coupling, we arrived at thiazolium IL HO[TM]Cl, an analog of thiamine (Vitamin B1). The central objective of this work was to investigate activity and selectivity of the structurally modified HO[TM]Cl derivatives, AcO[TM]Cl bearing an electron-donating group at the 5-ring position and Ac[TM]I carrying an electron-withdrawing group at the 5-ring position (Scheme 2), in the self-coupling of FF and HMF. We reasoned that, by tuning the electronic feature of the thiazolium ring, the nucleophilicity of the corresponding NHC catalyst derived from deprotonation could be modulated, thus providing an opportunity to discover more activity and/or selective catalysts for coupling the biomass-derived furaldehydes.
Ijms 16 07143 g007 1024
Scheme 2. Outlined catalytic cycle of the benzoin condensation through the Breslow intermediate (D) and the three thiazolium ILs investigated in this study as the precatalysts for coupling of furaldehydes.
Scheme 2. Outlined catalytic cycle of the benzoin condensation through the Breslow intermediate (D) and the three thiazolium ILs investigated in this study as the precatalysts for coupling of furaldehydes.
Ijms 16 07143 g007

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis of Two New Thiazolium ILs AcO[TM]Cl and Ac[TM]I

The parent thiazolium salt HO[TM]Cl carries the 2-hydroxyethyl group at the 5-position of the methylthiazolium ring. To examine if the protic OH group facilitates or hampers the coupling reaction of furaldehydes, we designed the synthesis of its acetate derivative AcO[TM]Cl. Alkylation of the corresponding substituted methylthiazole with benzyl chloride produced AcO[TM]Cl in 81% isolated yield (Scheme 3). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, Figure 1) and 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, Figure 2) spectra confirm the formation of the clean, desired product, with all the resonances assigned to the expected protons and carbons, respectively (see Experimental Section). Noteworthy is the chemical shift of the C2-H (i.e., NCHS) at 10.26 ppm, indicative of the acidic nature of this proton.
As both HO[TM]Cl and AcO[TM]Cl carry an electron-donating group at the 5-ring position, we designed the synthesis of Ac[TM]I with the electron-withdrawing methoxycarbonyl (acetyl type) group attached to the 5-ring position (Scheme 3). Initial attempts to alkylate the corresponding methylthiazole with benzyl chloride failed to produce the anticipated thiazolium chloride salt, as a result of the electron-deficient nature of the thiazole ring with the methoxycarbonyl attached to it. In turn, we employed the stronger alkylating reagent, MeI, successfully producing the corresponding thiazolium iodide salt, Ac[TM]I. As can be seen from 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, Figure 3) and 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, Figure 4) spectra, the formation of the clean, desired product is achieved. As anticipated, the acidic C2-H (i.e., NCHS) is largely downfield-shifted to 10.02 ppm, consistent with the chemical shift of the same proton observed for HO[TM]Cl and AcO[TM]Cl.
Ijms 16 07143 g008 1024
Scheme 3. Synthesis of two new thiazolium salts as the precatalysts for coupling of furaldehydes.
Scheme 3. Synthesis of two new thiazolium salts as the precatalysts for coupling of furaldehydes.
Ijms 16 07143 g008
Ijms 16 07143 g001 1024
Figure 1. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) of AcO[TM]Cl.
Figure 1. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) of AcO[TM]Cl.
Ijms 16 07143 g001
Ijms 16 07143 g002 1024
Figure 2. 13C NMR (CDCl3) of AcO[TM]Cl.
Figure 2. 13C NMR (CDCl3) of AcO[TM]Cl.
Ijms 16 07143 g002
Ijms 16 07143 g003 1024
Figure 3. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) of Ac[TM]I.
Figure 3. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) of Ac[TM]I.
Ijms 16 07143 g003
Ijms 16 07143 g004 1024
Figure 4. 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) of Ac[TM]I.
Figure 4. 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) of Ac[TM]I.
Ijms 16 07143 g004

2.2. Coupling Reaction of FF to Furoin by HO[TM]Cl, AcO[TM]Cl, and Ac[TM]I

The self-coupling of FF to 1,2-Di(furan-2-yl)-2-hydroxyethanone (furoin) by the thiazolium salt in combination with a base was carried out under neat conditions (no solvent), the results of which were summarized in Table 1. The acetate derivative, AcO[TM]Cl, when combined with 2 equiv of Et3N, was found to be highly effective to catalyze the FF-to-furoin coupling reaction. Specifically, with a loading of 1 mol % pre-catalyst, furoin was achieved in 99% yield (by NMR) at 80 °C in 3 h (entry 1, Table 1). Lowering the pre-catalyst loading to 0.5 and 0.1 mol % while keeping the temperature and time the same still afforded furoin in quantitative yield (entries 2 and 3, Table 1). When carried out at 60 °C for 1 h, the furion yield with a low pre-catalyst loading of 0.1 mol % depended on the amount of the base added, varying from 81% (entry 4), 86% (entry 5), to >99% (entry 6) when the amount of Et3N was increased from 1, 2, and 4 equivalents (relative to the pre-catalyst), respectively. Other bases such as KOtBu and 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU) were also examined but found to be much inferior to Et3N (entries 7 and 8 vs. entry 5, Table 1).
Table
Table 1. Results of self-coupling of FF to furoin catalyzed by thiazolium ILs and base.
Table 1. Results of self-coupling of FF to furoin catalyzed by thiazolium ILs and base.
EntryPre-Catalyst (mol %)Base (mol %)Temperature (°C)Time (h)Furoin Yield (%)
1AcO[TM]Cl, 1Et3N, 280399
2AcO[TM]Cl, 0.5Et3N, 180399
3AcO[TM]Cl, 0.1Et3N, 0.2803>99
4AcO[TM]Cl, 0.1Et3N, 0.160181
5AcO[TM]Cl, 0.1Et3N, 0.260186
6AcO[TM]Cl, 0.1Et3N, 0.4601>99
7AcO[TM]Cl, 0.1KOtBu, 0.260160
8AcO[TM]Cl, 0.1DBU, 0.260156
9HO[TM]Cl, 0.5Et3N, 180399
10HO[TM]Cl, 0.1Et3N, 0.460184
11Ac[TM]I, 0.1Et3N, 0.28030
12Ac[TM]I, 0.5Et3N, 180316
13Ac[TM]I, 5Et3N, 1080349
14Ac[TM]I, 10Et3N, 2080384
The performance of AcO[TM]Cl was compared with the benchmark thiazolium IL HO[TM]Cl. Under relatively high pre-catalyst loading conditions (0.5 mol % or above) at 80 °C for 3 h, the two catalyst systems were indistinguishable, with both achieving quantitative furoin yields under the same conditions (entry 9 vs. 2, Table 1). However, monitoring the reaction by 1H NMR showed the coupling reaction by the catalyst derived from AcO[TM]Cl is much faster and efficient than the coupling by HO[TM]Cl. Thus, with 0.5 mol % of the pre-catalyst loading in combination with 1 mol % of Et3N at 80 °C, the coupling reaction by HO[TM]Cl achieved only 18% furoin yield after 20 min, corresponding to a turn-over frequency (TOF) of 108 h−1, while the coupling by AcO[TM]Cl afforded furoin in 83% yield over the same time period of 20 min, with TOF = 498 h−1, thus being 4.6 times faster. Furthermore, employing the best-performing conditions found for AcO[TM]Cl (0.1 mol % pre-catalyst, 0.4 mol % Et3N, 60 °C, 1 h), the HO[TM]Cl-based catalyst system produced furoin in 84% yield (entry 10, Table 1), as compared to >99% yield achieved by AcO[TM]Cl (entry 6, Table 1).
The thiazolium derivative carrying an electron-withdrawing group on the ring, Ac[TM]I, was much inferior to either HO[TM]Cl or AcO[TM]Cl. For instance, with a low pre-catalyst loading of 0.1 mol %, the Ac[TM]I-based system was ineffective for the coupling reaction (entry 11, Table 1). Increasing the pre-catalyst loading to 0.5, 5, and 10 mol %, the furoin yield was enhanced gradually to 16, 49, and 84%, respectively (entries 12, 13, and 14, Table 1). This large reduction in the catalytic performance by Ac[TM]I could be attributable to the electron-withdrawing substitute that renders low nucleophilicity of the corresponding NHC catalyst. Overall, for the current three thiazolium ILs investigated for the FF coupling reaction, the catalytic performance follows this order: AcO[TM]Cl > HO[TM]Cl >> Ac[TM]I.

2.3. Coupling Reaction of HMF to DHMF by HO[TM]Cl, AcO[TM]Cl, and Ac[TM]I

The self-coupling of HMF to DHMF by the thiazolium salt in combination with a base was also carried out under neat conditions (no solvent), the results of which are summarized in Table 2. The coupling of HMF to DHMF is a much more challenging reaction than the self-coupling of FF, requiring the catalyst in higher loadings. Specifically, with 1 and 5 mol % loadings of AcO[TM]Cl in combination with 2 equivalents of Et3N at 80 °C for 3 h, DHMF was achieved in only 34% and 50% yield, respectively (entries 1 and 2, Table 2). Increasing the catalyst loading to 10 mol % significantly enhanced the DHMF yield to 94% (entry 3, Table 2). Increasing the reaction temperature to 100 and 120 °C improved the DHMF yield somewhat to 96% and 97%, respectively (entries 4 and 5, Table 2). Again, other bases such as KOtBu and DBU gave inferior catalytic performances relative to Et3N (entries 6, 7, and 8 vs. entries 3 and 4, Table 2).
Table
Table 2. Results of self-coupling of HMF to DHMF catalyzed by thiazolium ILs and base.
Table 2. Results of self-coupling of HMF to DHMF catalyzed by thiazolium ILs and base.
EntryPre-Catalyst (mol %)Base (mol %)Temperature (°C)Time (h)Furoin Yield (%)
1AcO[TM]Cl, 1Et3N, 280334
2AcO[TM]Cl, 5Et3N,1080350
3AcO[TM]Cl, 10Et3N, 2080394
4AcO[TM]Cl, 10Et3N, 20100396
5AcO[TM]Cl, 10Et3N, 20120397
6AcO[TM]Cl, 10KOtBu, 2080389
7AcO[TM]Cl, 10KOtBu, 20100393
8AcO[TM]Cl, 10DBU, 2080386
9HO[TM]Cl, 10Et3N, 20 80393
10HO[TM]Cl, 10Et3N, 20 120397
11Ac[TM]I, 0.5Et3N, 180337
12Ac[TM]I, 10Et3N, 2080386
13Ac[TM]I, 10KOtBu, 2080359
14Ac[TM]I, 10DBU, 2080371
For the HMF coupling reaction, HO[TM]Cl performed comparably to AcO[TM]Cl, achieving essentially the same DHMF yields under identical conditions (entry 9 vs. 3, entry 10 vs. 5, Table 2). On the other hand, based on the coupling results (entries 11–14, Table 2), Ac[TM]I was again much inferior to either HO[TM]Cl or AcO[TM]Cl. Overall, for the current three thiazolium ILs investigated for the HMF coupling reaction, the catalytic performance follows this order: AcO[TM]Cl ~ HO[TM]Cl >> Ac[TM]I.

2.4. Proposed Mechanism for FF and HMF Coupling Reaction

To provide further insight into the mechanism of the coupling reaction of FF by the thiazolium/Et3N system, we monitored the reaction of Ac[TM]I + Et3N + FUR (1:1:1) at 80 °C by 1H NMR (Figure 5). The 1H NMR spectrum of the initial mixture showed a mixture of starting reagents (Figure 5a). As the reaction progresses, formation of a new species (from spectrum (a) to (b) to (c)) became apparent; the NMR characteristics of this species (δ 8.05 (dd, 1H), 7.45 (dd, 1H), 6.73 (dd, 1H) ppm for the three furan ring protons, δ 6.21 (s, 1H) for the methide proton (CHOH), δ 3.48 (s, 3H) for the methoxy group (OCH3), δ 2.88 (s, 3H) for the methyl group attached to N (NCH3), and δ 2.28 (s, 3H) for the methyl group on the ring (C=C–CH3).) are consistent with the NHC–FF adduct, intermediate II (Scheme 4). Addition of a second equivalent of FF to the resulting intermediate led to immediate formation of the final coupling product, furoin (Figure 5d).
Ijms 16 07143 g005 1024
Figure 5. Overlay of 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) spectra in the furan and methide proton region of the reaction of Ac[TM]I + Et3N + FF (1:1:1) at 80 °C leading to formation of intermediate II and furoin (upon addition second equivalent of FF).
Figure 5. Overlay of 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) spectra in the furan and methide proton region of the reaction of Ac[TM]I + Et3N + FF (1:1:1) at 80 °C leading to formation of intermediate II and furoin (upon addition second equivalent of FF).
Ijms 16 07143 g005
The above results and the identification of intermediate II led to the coupling mechanism proposed in Scheme 4, which is consistent with the mechanism proposed for the self-coupling of HMF by [EMIM]OAc [36]. Specifically, the NHC catalyst (I) is generated by in situ deprotonation of Ac[TM]I with Et3N. Nucleophilic addition of the carbene I to the carbonyl group of FF generates a zwitterionic tetrahedral intermediate, which is protonated by [Et3NH]+ to intermediate II and regeneration of Et3N. Next, intermediate II is deprotonated by Et3N to form a nucleophilic enol (III), the Breslow intermediate. This enol is an acyl anion equivalent (nucleophilic), thus attacking the carbonyl group of a second FF molecule to form another tetrahedral intermediate (IV). Collapse of this tetrahedral intermediate, via proton transfer and elimination of I, produces furoin and regenerates the NHC catalyst, thus closing the catalytic cycle (Scheme 4). The observation of intermediate II from the 1:1:1 reaction of Ac[TM]I + Et3N + FF and immediate formation of furoin, without observing the intermediate IV upon addition of the second equivalent of FF, suggested that the steps from I to II are fast (and reversible), relative to the second half of the catalytic cycle involving addition of the second FF molecule.
Ijms 16 07143 g009 1024
Scheme 4. Proposed mechanism for coupling of FF by Ac[TM]I/Et3N.
Scheme 4. Proposed mechanism for coupling of FF by Ac[TM]I/Et3N.
Ijms 16 07143 g009

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Materials, Reagents, and Methods

All syntheses and manipulations of air- and moisture-sensitive materials were carried out in flamed Schlenk-type glassware on a dual-manifold Schlenk line, on a high-vacuum line, or in an inert gas (Ar or N2)-filled glovebox. NMR-scale reactions were conducted in Teflon-valve-sealed J. Young-type NMR tubes. HPLC-grade organic solvents were first sparged extensively with nitrogen during filling 20 L solvent reservoirs and then dried by passage through activated alumina (for Et2O, THF, and CH2Cl2) followed by passage through Q-5 supported copper catalyst (for toluene and hexanes) stainless steel columns. DMSO-d6 was first degassed and dried over CaH2, followed by vacuum distillation (CaH2 was filtered off before the distillation). NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian Inova 300 (FT 300 MHz, 1H; 75 MHz, 13C) or a Varian Inova 400 MHz spectrometer. Chemical shifts for 1H and 13C spectra were referenced to internal NMR solvent residual resonances and reported as parts per million relative to SiMe4 (TMS). High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) data were collected on an Agilent 6220 Accurate time-of-flight LC/MS spectrometer.
Furfural (FF, Alfa Aesar, Ward Hill, MA, USA), 5-hydroxymethyl furfural (HMF, Acros Organics, Waltham, MA, USA), Et3N (Acros Organics), KOtBu (Acros Organics), 1,8-diazabicyclo [5.4.0] undec-7-ene (DBU, Acros Organics), methyl iodide (Acros Organics), 5-(2-acetoxyethyl)-4-methylthiazole (TCI America, Montgomeryville, PA, USA), 3-benzyl-5-(2-hydroxyethyl)-4-methylthiazolium chloride (HO[TM]Cl, Alfa Aesar), benzyl chloride (Acros Organics), and 4-methylthiazole-5-carboxylate (Oxchem Corp, Irwindale, CA, USA) were purchased from the respective commercial vendors and used as received.

3.2. Synthesis of Ionic Liquid AcO[TM]Cl

5-(2-Acetoxyethyl)-4-methylthiazole (1.85 g, 10.0 mmol) was mixed with an excess of benzyl chloride (6.33 g, 50.0 mmol) in a round-bottom flask. The mixture was heated at 80 °C for 24 h, during which time precipitates formed. The solid was filtered off and washed with ethyl acetate. After drying under vacuum, AcO[TM]Cl was obtained as a white solid; yield: 2.51 g (81%).
1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 10.26 (s, 1H, thiazole ring proton), 7.25–7.45 (m, 5H, Ph), 5.77 (s, 2H, CH2Ph), 4.12 (t, J = 4.5 Hz, 2H, OCH2), 3.22 (t, J = 4.5 Hz, 2H, OCH2CH2), 2.31 (s, 3H, CH3C=O), 1.92 (s, 3H, C=C–CH3). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 169.9 (C=O), 158.6 (SCN), 142.4 (NC=C), 133.8 (SC=C), 131.1, 129.3, 129.1, 128.1 (Ph), 62.4 (OCH2), 57.0 (CH2Ph), 26.2 (OCH2CH2), 20.6 (CH3C=O), 12.4 (C=C–CH3). HRMS calculated for C15H18ClNO2S [M-H]−: 310.0674; found: 310.0670.

3.3. Synthesis of Ionic Liquid Ac[TM]I

4-Methylthiazole-5-carboxylate (1.0 g, 32 mmol) was mixed with an excess of methyl iodide (2.0 mL) in a round-bottom flask, and the mixture was heated at 40 °C for 24 h. After removal of the excess methyl iodide, the partly crystalline residue was dissolved in absolute alcohol. On careful addition of diethyl ether, the product crystallized in large light yellow needles (0.85 g, 45% yield on the first crop).
1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 10.02 (s, 1H, thiazole ring-H), 4.09 (s, 1H, OCH3), 3.89 (s, 3H, NCH3), 2.75 (s, 3H, C=C–CH3). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 162.3 (C=O), 159.9 (SCN), 152.9 (NC=C), 125.6 (SC=C), 54.2 (O–CH3), 41.3 (NCH3), 13.1 (C=C–CH3). HRMS calculated for C7H10INO2S [M + H]+: 299.9477; found: 299.8741.

3.4. Typical Procedure for Coupling Reaction of FF into Furoin

The coupling reaction was carried out under solvent-free (neat) conditions. In a typical coupling experiment, FF (0.77 g, 8.0 mmol), AcO[TM]Cl (25 mg, 0.08 mmol), and Et3N (2.23 μL, 0.16 mmol) were loaded into a 20 mL vial in the glovebox. The vial was sealed, taken out of the glovebox, and then put in a temperature-controlled orbit shaker. The reaction mixture was shaken (300 rpm) at 80 °C for 3 h. After the reaction, the solidified product was washed with 10 mL hexanes and filtered. After drying in vacuum, furoin was obtained in 99% yield as a bright-yellow powder. 1H NMR for furoin (CDCl3) [33,55]: δ 7.62, 7.38, 7.26, 6.54, 6.41, 6.36 (dd, 6H, furan ring H), 5.80 (s, 1H, CHOH), 4.19 (br s, 1H, CHOH). 1H NMR for furoin (DMSO-d6): δ 8.00 (d, 1H), 7.60 (d, 1H), 7.53 (d, 1H), 6.79 (d, 1H), 6.42 (d, 2H), 6.12 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 1H, CHOH), 5.79 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 1H, CHOH).

3.5. Typical Procedure for Coupling Reaction of HMF into DHMF

The coupling reaction was carried out under solvent-free (neat) conditions. In a typical coupling experiment, HMF (0.126 g, 1.00 mmol), AcO[TM]Cl (0.0311 g, 0.1 mmol), and Et3N (27.4 μL, 0.2 mmol) were loaded into a 20 mL vial in the glovebox. The vial was sealed, taken out of the glovebox, and then put in a temperature-controlled orbit shaker. The reaction mixture was shaken (300 rpm) at 80 °C for 3 h. After the reaction, the solidified product was washed with 10 mL toluene to remove the residual catalyst and any unreacted HMF. DHMF (94% yield) was obtained as white powder after filtration and vacuum drying. 1H NMR for DHMF (DMSO-d6) [36]: δ 7.50, 6.50, 6.34, 6.22 (d, 4H, furan ring H), 6.06 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 1H, CHOH), 5.73 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 1H, CHOH), 5.50 (t, J = 5.9 Hz, 1H, CH2OH), 5.18 (t, J = 5.7 Hz, 1H, CH2OH), 4.46 (d, J = 5.8 Hz, 2H, CH2OH), 4.31 (d, J = 5.7 Hz, 2H, CH2OH).

3.6. Generation of Intermediate II from Reaction of Ac[TM]I + Et3N +FF

Ac[TM]I (29.9 mg, 0.01 mmoL) and Et3N (10.0 mg, 0.01 mmoL) were dissolved in 0.5 mL DMSO-d6 and transferred into a J. Young-type NMR tube, to which FF (9.6 mg, 0.01 mmoL) in 0.5 mL DMSO-d6 was added and fully mixed. The mixture was heated to 80 °C on an NMR spectrometer, and the reaction was followed by taking 1H NMR spectra of the reaction mixture at predetermined time intervals. After 3 h at 80 °C, the formation of intermediate II was indicated by 1H NMR spectrum. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 8.05 (dd, J = 1.65, 0.61 Hz, 1H, furan ring proton), 7.45 (dd, J = 3.65, 0.61 Hz, 1H, furan ring proton), 6.73 (dd, J = 3.65, 1.65 Hz, 1H, furan ring proton), 6.21 (s, 1H, CHOH), 3.48 (s, 3H, OCH3), 2.88 (s, 3H, NCH3), 2.28 (s, 3H, C=C–CH3).

4. Conclusions

This work has synthesized, and examined catalytic performance of, two new electronically modified thiazolium ILs as inexpensive alternatives to the discrete NHC catalysts for umpolung coupling of bio-derived furaldehyde FF and HMF into chain-extended C10 and C12 furoins. Comparing to the current thiazolium benchmark catalyst based on HO[TM]Cl, we found that AcO[TM]Cl bearing an electron-donating group at the 5-ring position, when combined with Et3N, is the most active and efficient catalyst in this series for coupling of FF, being 4.6 times faster than the current benchmark catalyst system. Thus, the catalyst system with a low catalyst loading of only 0.1 mol % of AcO[TM]Cl and 0.4 mol % Et3N, >99% yield of furoin was obtained from the coupling reaction of FF at 60 °C for 1 h. On the other hand, the catalyst system based on Ac[TM]I carrying an electron-withdrawing group at the 5-ring position is the least active and efficient system of the series. For the more challenging coupling reaction of HMF, AcO[TM]Cl and HO[TM]Cl performed equally well, with both achieving 97% yield of DHMF at 120 °C after 3 h, albeit requiring a high catalyst loading of 10 mol %.
The study also yielded the proposed mechanism for the coupling reaction (c.f., Scheme 4). The catalyst responsible for the coupling reaction is the in situ generated NHC I, upon deprotonation of the thiazolium IL by Et3N, which attacks the carbonyl group of FF to form the NHC–FF adduct, intermediate II. Upon deprotonation of intermediate II, the in situ generated enol (III), the Breslow intermediate, undergoes nucleophilic attack at the carbonyl group of a second FF molecule to form the second tetrahedral intermediate (IV). Collapse of this intermediate, via proton transfer and elimination of I, produces the coupling product furoin and regenerates the NHC catalyst, thus closing the catalytic cycle.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, grant DE-FG02-10ER16193.

Author Contributions

Eugene Y. X. Chen was the principle investigator of the project, designed the experiments, and wrote the manuscript. Hongjun Zang performed the entire experiments, collected and analyzed data, as well as wrote the draft of the Experimental Section.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, T.; Nolte, M.W.; Shanks, B.H. Catalytic dehydration of C6 carbohydrates for the production of hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) as a versatile platform chemical. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 548–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Saha, B.; Abu-Omar, M.M. Advances in 5-hydroxymethylfurfural production from biomass in biphasic solvents. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 24–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Teong, S.P.; Yi, G.; Zhang, Y. Hydroxymethylfurfural production from bioresources: Past, present and future. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 2015–2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Van Putten, R.-J.; van der Waal, J.C.; de Jong, E.; Rasrendra, C.B.; Heeres, H.J.; de Vries, J.G. Hydroxymethylfurfural, a versatile platform chemical made from renewable resources. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 1499–1597. [Google Scholar]
  5. Lange, J.-P.; van der Heide, E.; van Buijtenen, J.; Richard Price, R. Furfural—A promising platform for lignocellulosic biofuels. ChemSusChem 2012, 5, 150–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Rosatella, A.A.; Simeonov, S.P.; Frade, R.F.M.; Afonso, C.A.M. 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) as a building block platform: Biological properties, synthesis and synthetic applications. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 754–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zakrzewska, M.E.; Bogel-Łukasik, E.; Bogel-Łukasik, R. Ionic liquid-mediated formation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural—A promising biomass-derived building block. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 397–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ståhlberg, T.; Fu, W.; Woodley, J.M.; Riisager, A. Synthesis of 5-(hydroxymethyl)furfural in ionic liquids: Paving the way to renewable chemicals. ChemSusChem 2011, 4, 451–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. James, O.O.; Maity, S.; Usman, L.A.; Ajanaku, K.O.; Ajani, O.O.; Siyanbola, T.O.; Sahu, S.; Chaubey, R. Towards the conversion of carbohydrate biomass feedstocks to biofuels via hydroxylmethylfurfural. Energy Environ. Sci. 2010, 3, 1833–1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bozell, J.J.; Petersen, G.R. Technology development for the production of biobased products from biorefinery carbohydrates—The US department of energy’s “Top 10” revisited. Green Chem. 2010, 12, 539–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Werpy, T.; Petersen, G. Top Value Added Chemicals from Biomass; U.S. Department of Energy: Washington, DC, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  12. Alonso, D.M.; Wettstein, S.G.; Dumesic, J.A. Gamma-valerolactone, a sustainable platform molecule derived from lignocellulosic biomass. Green Chem. 2013, 15, 584–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gallezot, P. Conversion of biomass to selected chemical products. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 1538–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Alonso, D.M.; Bond, J.Q.; Dumesic, J.A. Catalytic conversion of biomass to biofuels. Green Chem. 2010, 12, 1493–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Corma, A.; Iborra, S.; Velty, A. Chemical routes for the transformation of biomass into chemicals. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 2411–2502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Corma, A.; Huber, G.W. Synergies between bio- and oil refineries for the production of fuels from biomass. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 7184–7201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Huber, G.W.; Iborra, S.; Corma, A. Synthesis of transportation fuels from biomass: Chemistry, catalysts, and engineering. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 4044–4098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wegenhart, B.L.; Liu, S.; Thom, M.; Stanley, D.; Abu-Omar, M.M. A Solvent-free method for making dioxolane and dioxane from the biorenewables glycerol and furfural catalyzed by oxorhenium(V) oxazoline. ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 2524–2530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Balakrishnan, M.; Sacia, E.R.; Bell, A.T. Etherification and reductive etherification of 5-(hydroxymethyl)furfural: 5-(Alkoxymethyl)furfurals and 2,5-bis(alkoxymethyl)furans as potential bio-diesel candidates. Green Chem. 2012, 14, 1626–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Corma, A.; de la Torre, O.; Renz, M. Production of high quality diesel from cellulose and hemicellulose by the Sylvan process: Catalysts and process variables. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 6328–6344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Corma, A.; de la Torre, O.; Renz, M.; Villandier, N. Production of high-quality diesel from biomass waste products. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 2375–2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Huber, G.W.; Chheda, J.N.; Barrett, C.J.; Dumesic, J.A. Production of liquid alkanes by aqueous-phase processing of biomass-derived carbohydrates. Science 2005, 308, 1446–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sutton, A.D.; Waldie, F.D.; Wu, R.; Schlaf, M.; Silks, L.A., III; Gordon, J.C. The hydrodeoxygenation of bioderived furans into alkanes. Nat. Chem. 2013, 5, 428–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Huang, Y.-B.; Yang, Z.; Dai, J.-J.; Guo, Q.-X.; Fu, Y. Production of high quality fuels from lignocellulose-derived chemicals: A convenient C–C bond formation of furfural, 5-methylfurfural and aromatic aldehyde. RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 11211–11214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, D.; Chen, E.Y.-X. Organocatalysis in biorefining for biomass conversion and upgrading. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 964–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jacobsen, E.N.; MacMillan, D.W.C. Organocatalysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 20618–20619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. MacMillan, D.W.C. The advent and development of organocatalysis. Nature 2008, 455, 304–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Houk, K.N.; List, B. Asymmetric organocatalysis. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 487–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bugaut, X.; Glorius, F. Organocatalytic umpolung: N-Heterocyclic carbenes and beyond. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 3511–3522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Wende, R.C.; Schreiner, P. Evolution of asymmetric organocatalysis: Multi- and retrocatalysis. Green Chem. 2012, 14, 1821–1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Grondal, C.; Jeanty, M.; Enders, D. Organocatalytic cascade reactions as a new tool in total synthesis. Nat. Chem. 2010, 2, 167–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Enders, D.; Niemeier, O.; Henseler, A. Organocatalysis by N-heterocyclic carbenes. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 5606–5655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Liu, D.; Chen, E.Y.-X. Diesel and alkane fuels from biomass by organocatalysis and metal-acid tandem catalysis. ChemSusChem 2013, 6, 2236–2239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Caes, B.R.; Palte, M.J.; Raines, R.T. Organocatalytic conversion of cellulose into a platform chemical. Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 196–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ståhlberg, T.; Rodriguez-Rodriguez, S.; Fristrup, P.; Riisager, A. Metal-free dehydration of glucose to 5-(hydroxymethyl)furfural in ionic liquids with boric acid as a promoter. Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 1456–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Liu, D.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, E.Y.-X. Organocatalytic upgrading of the key biorefining building block by a catalytic ionic liquid and N-heterocyclic carbenes. Green Chem. 2012, 14, 2738–2746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Enders, D.; Breuer, K.; Kallfass, U.; Balensiefer, T. Preparation and application of 1,3,4-triphenyl-4,5-dihydro-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-ylidene, a new stable carbine. Synthesis 2003, 8, 1292–1295. [Google Scholar]
  38. Enders, D.; Breuer, K.; Raabe, G.; Runsink, J.; Teles, J.H.; Melder, J.-P.; Ebel, K.; Brode, S. Preparation, structure, and reactivity of 1,3,4-triphenyl-4,5-dihydro-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-ylidene, a new stable carbine. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1995, 34, 1021–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Remsing, R.C.; Swatloski, R.P.; Rogers, R.D.; Moyna, G. Mechanism of cellulose dissolution in the ionic Liquid 1-n-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride: A 13C and 35/37Cl NMR relaxation study on model systems. Chem. Commun. 2006, 12, 1271–1273. [Google Scholar]
  40. Swatloski, R.P.; Spear, S.K.; Holbrey, J.D.; Rogers, R.D. Dissolution of cellulose with ionic liquids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 4974–4975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Zakrzewska, M.E.; Bogel-Łukasik, E.; Bogel-Łukasik, R. Solubility of carbohydrates in ionic liquids. Energy Fuels 2010, 24, 737–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. El Seoud, O.A.; Koschella, A.; Fidale, L.C.; Dorn, S.; Heinze, T. Applications of ionic liquids in carbohydrate chemistry: A window of opportunities. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8, 2629–2647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wasserscheid, P.; Welton, T. Ionic Liquids in Synthesis, 2nd ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  44. Pârvulescu, V.I.; Hardacre, C. Catalysis in ionic liquids. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 2615–2665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Stark, A.; Seddon, K. Ionic liquids. In Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2007; Volume 26, pp. 836–920. [Google Scholar]
  46. Sun, N.; Rodriguez, H.; Rahman, M.; Rogers, R.D. Where are ionic liquid strategies most suited in the pursuit of chemicals and energy from lignocellulosic biomass? Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 1405–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Pinkert, A.; Marsh, K.N.; Pang, S.; Staiger, M.P. Ionic liquids and their interaction with cellulose. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 6712–6728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Moore, J.L.; Rovis, T. Carbene catalysts. Top. Curr. Chem. 2009, 291, 77–144. [Google Scholar]
  49. Kluger, R.; Tittmann, K. Thiamin diphosphate catalysis: Enzymic and nonenzymic covalent intermediates. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 1797–1833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Breslow, R. On the mechanism of thiamine action. IV. Evidence from studies on model systems. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 3719–3726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Breslow, R. Rapid deuterium exchange in thiazolium salts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1957, 79, 1762–1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kabro, A.; Escudero-Adán, E.C.; Grushin, V.V.; van Leeuwen, P.W. Biomass conversion to high value chemicals: From furfural to chiral hydrofuroins in two steps. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 4014–4017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Enders, D.; Kallfass, U. An efficient nucleophilic carbene catalyst for the asymmetric benzoin condensation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1743–1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Stetter, H.; Raemsch, R.Y.; Kuhlmann, H. The preparative use of thiazolium salt-catalyzed acyloin and benzoin formation, I. Preparation of simple acyloins and benzoins. Synthesis 1976, 733, 733–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hashmi, A.S.K.; Wölfle, M.; Teles, J.H.; Frey, W. Bisphenols from furfurals by organocatalysis and gold catalysis. Synlett 2007, 11, 1747–1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lee, C.K.; Kim, M.S.; Gong, J.S.; Lee, I.-S.H. Benzoin condensation reaction of 5-membered heterocyclic compounds. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1992, 29, 149–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zang, H.; Chen, E.Y.X. Organocatalytic Upgrading of Furfural and 5-Hydroxymethyl Furfural to C10 and C12 Furoins with Quantitative Yield and Atom-Efficiency. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 7143-7158. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16047143

AMA Style

Zang H, Chen EYX. Organocatalytic Upgrading of Furfural and 5-Hydroxymethyl Furfural to C10 and C12 Furoins with Quantitative Yield and Atom-Efficiency. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2015; 16(4):7143-7158. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16047143

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zang, Hongjun, and Eugene Y. X. Chen. 2015. "Organocatalytic Upgrading of Furfural and 5-Hydroxymethyl Furfural to C10 and C12 Furoins with Quantitative Yield and Atom-Efficiency" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 16, no. 4: 7143-7158. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16047143

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop