Next Article in Journal
Comparing Biofouling Control Treatments for Use on Aquaculture Nets
Next Article in Special Issue
Development of Small RNA Delivery Systems for Lung Cancer Therapy
Previous Article in Journal
Battle Against Cancer: An Everlasting Saga of p53
Previous Article in Special Issue
Se-Methylselenocysteine Inhibits Apoptosis Induced by Clusterin Knockdown in Neuroblastoma N2a and SH-SY5Y Cell Lines
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 15
Issue 12
10.3390/ijms151222128
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

MiR-222 Targeted PUMA to Improve Sensitization of UM1 Cells to Cisplatin

by
Fangfang Jiang
†,
Wei Zhao
†,
Lijie Zhou
,
Zifeng Liu
,
Wenqing Li
and
Dongsheng Yu
*
Guanghua School of Stomatology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510055, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15(12), 22128-22141; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms151222128
Submission received: 26 September 2014 / Revised: 8 November 2014 / Accepted: 19 November 2014 / Published: 2 December 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue RNA Interference)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
microRNAs have been shown to play critical roles in regulating the chemosensitivity of cancer cells. As a member of the oncogenic miRNAs (oncomiRs), miR-222 has been reported to drive the oncogenesis of many types of malignancies. However, little is known concerning the specific role of miR-222 in human oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). The present study explored the role and mechanism of miR-222 in increasing the expression of p53 up-regulated modulator of apoptosis (PUMA) and enhancing the sensitivity of OSCC to cisplatin (CDDP). Results showed that antisense (As)-miR-222 inhibits the expression of miR-222. In contrast, PUMA was dramaticallyup-regulated. IC50 values were significantly decreased in cells treated with As-miR-222 combined with CDDP, to a greater extent than in cells treated with CDDP alone. Furthermore, As-miR-222 enhanced apoptosis and inhibited the invasiveness of UM1 cells. Analysis of the above data suggested that, in UM1 cells, there might be a regulatory loop between miR-222 and PUMA, and that miR-222 inhibition increased the chemosensitivity to CDDP. These findings demonstrated that down-regulation of miR-222 could enhance the chemosensitivity of human OSCC cells to CDDP, and that the combination of As-miR-222 and CDDP could be an effective therapeutic strategy by boosting the expression of PUMA for controlling the growth of OSCC.
Keywords:
OSCC; PUMA; miR-222; cisplatin

1. Introduction

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is one of the most common types of head and neck cancer [1,2]. As one of the most useful treatment strategies, chemotherapy plays an important role alongside radiotherapy, surgery, biological therapy, and so on, in the multidisciplinary armamentarium against OSCC. Although the antitumor effects of chemotherapeutic agents have been confirmed in a broad range of malignant tumors, their usefulness is limited due to acquired resistance and severe side-effects [3]. New targeted therapies need to be developed, since the five-year survival rate of OSCC patients remains poor [4,5].
The p53 up-regulated modulator of apoptosis (PUMA), which is induced by p53 tumor suppressors or other apoptotic stimuli, is a newly discovered tumor suppressor and might be a promising new target for gene therapy [6]. It could also influence the chemosensitivity of OSCC cells.
Previous studies have shown that miRNAs can function as tumor suppressor miRNAs or oncogenic miRNAs (oncomiRs) and play important roles in transformation and carcinogenesis [7,8,9]. It was further observed that miRNAs play critical roles in regulating tumor cell responses to chemotherapeutic agents. As a member of oncomiRs, miR-222 has been shown to drive the oncogenesis of several malignancies [10,11,12], and some results have indicated that suppression of miR-222 in human epithelial cancers leads to the repression of cell growth and increasing apoptosis, which could enhance the chemotherapeutic effects of cancer therapy [12]. Analysis of our recent data showed that PUMA was a direct target of miR-222 in OSCC, and that miR-222 could regulate the cell biological behavior of UM1 and Tca8113 by targeting PUMA [13].
As a new strategy, chemical-gene therapy was developed in recent years. It combines traditional chemotherapy with gene therapy and may reduce drug dosages while increasing the efficacy of gene therapy. In the present study, we identified miR-222 as a potent regulator of PUMA and aimed to explore whether suppression of miR-222 could enhance the chemotherapeutic effect of cisplatin (CDDP) on OSCC UM1 cells. The results showed that As-miR-222/CDDP can up-regulate PUMA protein expression and lead to apoptosis in UM1 cells. These findings suggest that PUMA is a novel target of miR-222 and that miR-222 could be a critical therapeutic target for OSCC intervention.

2. Results

2.1. miR-222 and PUMA Expression in UM1 Cells Treated with Combination Therapy

As shown in Figure 1, the expression of miR-222 was verified by RT-PCR. Transfection of As-miR-222 altered miR-222 levels significantly compared with the control. It is worth noting that CDDP alone also down-regulated the expression of miR-222, and that the lowest level of miR-222 was achieved by transfection with As-miR-222 in combination with CDDP therapy. For further exploration of the mechanism of miR-222 involvement in UM1 cell biological behavior, the pro-apoptosis gene PUMA was measured by RT-PCR. In As-miR-222, CDDP and As-miR-222/CDDP groups, a marked increase of PUMA was observed.
Ijms 15 22128 g001 1024
Figure 1. RT-PCR analysis of miR-222 and PUMA expression in UM1 cells treated with CDDP and As-miR-222 combination. (A) RT-PCR results showed significant down-regulation of miR-222 after transfection with As-miR-222 in UM1 cells; and (B) The expression of PUMA in CDDP, As-miR-222 and As-miR-222/CDDP groups was significantly up-regulated relative to that in the control and scramble groups. * Denotes statistical significance (p < 0.05); ** denotes obvious statistical significance (p < 0.01).
Figure 1. RT-PCR analysis of miR-222 and PUMA expression in UM1 cells treated with CDDP and As-miR-222 combination. (A) RT-PCR results showed significant down-regulation of miR-222 after transfection with As-miR-222 in UM1 cells; and (B) The expression of PUMA in CDDP, As-miR-222 and As-miR-222/CDDP groups was significantly up-regulated relative to that in the control and scramble groups. * Denotes statistical significance (p < 0.05); ** denotes obvious statistical significance (p < 0.01).
Ijms 15 22128 g001

2.2. As-miR-222 and CDDP Alters Apoptotic Protein Expression

As-miR-222 and CDDP altered apoptotic protein expression, and the expression of apoptosis-related proteins (PUMA, Bcl-2, Bax and Bak) was measured by Western blot to explore the molecular mechanism of miR-222 involvement in UM1 cell apoptosis. As shown in Figure 2, a significant increase of PUMA was observed in UM1 cells in the CDDP, As-miR-222 and As-miR-222/CDDP groups, especially in the As-miR-222/CDDP group. In contrast, the expression of Bcl-2 in the CDDP, As-miR-222 and As-miR-222/CDDP groups was down-regulated relative to that in the control and mixed groups. Bax and Bak expression was increased as the result of Bcl-2 protein down-regulation. Analysis of the data indicated that As-miR-222 and CDDP could induce UM1 cell apoptosis through activation of PUMA and passivation of Bcl-2.

2.3. Determination of PUMA and Bcl-2 Expression in UM1 Cells

We performed immunofluorescence staining to determine the expression of PUMA and Bcl-2 in UM1 cells and examined cells using laser scanning confocal microscopy. After immunofluorescence staining, confocal images of UM1 cells showed high red fluorescence of PUMA in the CDDP, As-miR-222 and As-miR-222/CDDP groups; however, the control and mixed groups exhibited relatively low red fluorescence, suggesting weaker expression of PUMA (Figure 3A). In contrast, confocal images showed that the expression of Bcl-2 in the CDDP, As-miR-222 and As-miR-222/CDDP groups was significantly down-regulated compared with that in the control group (Figure 3B). Cell nuclei were stained for blue fluorescence. In various cancers, including OSCC, high expression of Bcl-2 and low expression of PUMA were important characteristics.
Ijms 15 22128 g002 1024
Figure 2. Expression of PUMA, Bcl-2, Bax and Bak in UM1 cells with treatment of As-miR-222 and CDDP. (A) As determined by Western blot analysis, PUMA, Bax and Bak were observed to be overexpressed in the CDDP, As-miR-222 and As-miR-222/CDDP groups. In contrast, Bcl-2 exhibited an opposite trend; (B) Relative expressions of PUMA, Bcl-2, Bax and Bak were quantified by Image J Instrument software after normalization with the density of GAPDH; and (C) miR-222 expression as control detected by RT-PCR.
Figure 2. Expression of PUMA, Bcl-2, Bax and Bak in UM1 cells with treatment of As-miR-222 and CDDP. (A) As determined by Western blot analysis, PUMA, Bax and Bak were observed to be overexpressed in the CDDP, As-miR-222 and As-miR-222/CDDP groups. In contrast, Bcl-2 exhibited an opposite trend; (B) Relative expressions of PUMA, Bcl-2, Bax and Bak were quantified by Image J Instrument software after normalization with the density of GAPDH; and (C) miR-222 expression as control detected by RT-PCR.
Ijms 15 22128 g002

2.4. As-miR-222 Increases the Cytotoxicity of CDDP on UM1 Cells and Inhibited Cell Proliferation and Invasion

Dose-response curves were performed for both single CDDP and in combination with As-miR-222. The results suggested that As-miR-222 could increase UM1 cell sensitivity to CDDP treatment and decrease cell proliferation. Figure 4A shows that the CDDP concentration causing 50% growth inhibition (IC50) of UM1 cells was 0.725 μg/mL, whereas, in combination with As-miR-222, the IC50 was 0.249 μg/mL. Meanwhile, CDDP could also increase the efficacy of As-miR-222. To evaluate the synergistic effect of As-miR-222 with CDDP on cell proliferation and migration, we used MTT assay, transwell and cell-clone-forming experiments to compare the growth of UM1 cells when treated with As-miR-222 alone or with CDDP. As shown in Figure 4, human OSCC UM1 cells treated with As-miR-222 and CDDP proliferated at a significantly lower rate than did other groups, as evaluated by MTT, transwell and cell-clone-forming experiments.
Ijms 15 22128 g003 1024
Figure 3. Determination of the expression of PUMA and Bcl-2 in UM1 cells with treatment of As-miR-222 and CDDP by immunofluorescence confocal microscopy; (A) Images showed that PUMA was overexpressed with treatment of As-miR-222 and CDDP in UM1 cells; (B) The expression of Bcl-2 exhibited an opposite trend compared with PUMA expression; (C) Relative expression of PUMA and Bcl-2; (D) miR-222 expression as control, detected by RT-PCR.
Figure 3. Determination of the expression of PUMA and Bcl-2 in UM1 cells with treatment of As-miR-222 and CDDP by immunofluorescence confocal microscopy; (A) Images showed that PUMA was overexpressed with treatment of As-miR-222 and CDDP in UM1 cells; (B) The expression of Bcl-2 exhibited an opposite trend compared with PUMA expression; (C) Relative expression of PUMA and Bcl-2; (D) miR-222 expression as control, detected by RT-PCR.
Ijms 15 22128 g003
Ijms 15 22128 g004 1024
Figure 4. Effect of As-miR-222 on the chemosensitivity of UM1 cells to CDDP treatment and on cell proliferation and invasion. (A) IC50 of UM1 cells treated with CDDP alone or in combination with As-miR-222; (B) MTT assay was performed to detect the growth of UM1 cells treated with As-miR-222 and CDDP; (C,E) Cell migration was detected by a transwell assay; and (D,F) Cell-clone-forming experiments were used to detect cell proliferation. * Denotes statistical significance (p < 0.05); ** denotes obvious statistical significance (p < 0.01).
Figure 4. Effect of As-miR-222 on the chemosensitivity of UM1 cells to CDDP treatment and on cell proliferation and invasion. (A) IC50 of UM1 cells treated with CDDP alone or in combination with As-miR-222; (B) MTT assay was performed to detect the growth of UM1 cells treated with As-miR-222 and CDDP; (C,E) Cell migration was detected by a transwell assay; and (D,F) Cell-clone-forming experiments were used to detect cell proliferation. * Denotes statistical significance (p < 0.05); ** denotes obvious statistical significance (p < 0.01).
Ijms 15 22128 g004

2.5. As-miR-222 and CDDP Induced UM1 Cell Apoptosis

As-miR-222 and CDDP inhibit cancer cell proliferation and induce cancer cell apoptosis. Apoptosis assays were used to test whether As-miR-222 or CDDP inhibited cell proliferation through the induction of cell apoptosis. Annexin V-PI analysis showed that the apoptotic cells were significantly increased in cells treated with As-miR-222 and CDDP together as compared with the other three groups, suggesting that apoptosis was obviously induced in cells when treated with As-miR-222 and CDDP (Figure 5).
Ijms 15 22128 g005 1024
Figure 5. As-miR-222 and CDDP induced UM1 cell apoptosis. (A) Percentages of apoptotic UM1 cells are shown in the histogram; (B) Flow cytometry analyses were performed to detect UM1 cell cycles in different groups. * Denotes statistical significance (p < 0.05); ** denotes obvious statistical significance (p < 0.01).
Figure 5. As-miR-222 and CDDP induced UM1 cell apoptosis. (A) Percentages of apoptotic UM1 cells are shown in the histogram; (B) Flow cytometry analyses were performed to detect UM1 cell cycles in different groups. * Denotes statistical significance (p < 0.05); ** denotes obvious statistical significance (p < 0.01).
Ijms 15 22128 g005

2.6. miR-222 Acts Directly on PUMA mRNA 3'UTR

To validate whether PUMA is a direct target of miR-222, we transfected PUMA 3'UTR and mutPUMA 3'UTR luciferase constructs into 293T cells with mimics NC, miR-222 mimics, inhibitor NC (negative control) or miR-222 inhibitor. Luciferase activity was measured by means of a dual-luciferase reporter assay system. Figure 6 shows that, compared with other groups, miR-222 mimics increased the activity of 293T cells transfected with PUMA 3'UTR.

3. Discussion

As a member of the Bcl-2 family, PUMA was discovered in 2001 and was found to possess a powerful pro-apoptotic effect. It belongs to the BH3-only subfamily and is also called Bcl-2 binding component 3 (BBC3). This gene encodes two BH3 domain-containing proteins (PUMA-α and PUMA-β). In contrast to other target spots, PUMA induces apoptosis through not only p53-dependent but also non-p53-dependent pathways to promote apoptosis [14,15,16,17]. Although the specific mechanism for inducing apoptosis needs further investigation, it has been shown to be a promising new target in gene therapy, since the pro-apoptotic function has achieved good results [8,17]. In our study, up-regulation of PUMA and down-regulation of Bcl-2 in UM1 cells were observed with the treatment of As-miR-222 and CDDP. We also found that PUMA 3'UTR mRNA existed in highly conserved miR-222 binding sites and further validated that PUMA was a direct target of miR-222 by luciferase reporter assay. The results suggest that PUMA is directly regulated by miR-222 in OSCC cells.
Ijms 15 22128 g006 1024
Figure 6. PUMA was identified as a target gene of miR-222. (A) A panel that described the site of binding between the miR-222 and the PUMA 3'UTR and the sequence of mutPUMA 3'UTR; and (B) Luciferase activity ratio was determined 48 h after 293T cells were transfected with mimics NC, miR-222 mimics, inhibitor NC or miR-222 inhibitor. ** denotes obvious statistical significance (p < 0.01).
Figure 6. PUMA was identified as a target gene of miR-222. (A) A panel that described the site of binding between the miR-222 and the PUMA 3'UTR and the sequence of mutPUMA 3'UTR; and (B) Luciferase activity ratio was determined 48 h after 293T cells were transfected with mimics NC, miR-222 mimics, inhibitor NC or miR-222 inhibitor. ** denotes obvious statistical significance (p < 0.01).
Ijms 15 22128 g006
Previous studies have shown that the expression profiles of miRNAs in chemoresistant human cancer cell lines vary from those of chemoresponsive tumor cells [18,19]. Altered expression of miRNAs could control the chemosensitivity of cancer cells through either directly regulating apoptosis-related Bcl-2 family proteins to modify the cellular response to apoptosis initiated by chemotherapeutic agents, or modulating drug availability to influence the responsiveness of tumor cells indirectly [20,21,22,23]. miRNA expression affected multiple genes simultaneously, and there were some findings providing support for this hypothesis. This was evidenced by the overexpression of miR-221/222, conferring resistance to tamoxifeninMCF-7 cells, and the down-regulation of miR-451 and miR-328, which could result in increased DOX and mitoxantrone sensitivity, respectively [24,25,26]. All the results suggested that the correction of altered expression of miRNAs might have significance for therapeutic strategies to overcome cancer cell resistance. In this study, we chose the UM1 cell line due to its stable performance and demonstrated, for the first time, that the down-regulation of miR-222 expression by As-miR-222 contributed to sensitizing UM1 cells to CDDP. Analysis of our dose-response data showed that As-miR-222 led to an increased sensitivity of UM1 cells to CDDP.
As a member of oncomiRs, miR-222 was frequently up-regulated in various types of human malignancies and has been associated with cell proliferation, invasion, migration and apoptotic ability in a variety of tumors. Several reports have indicated that miR-222 could be used as a therapeutic tool to modulate sensitivity or resistance to anti-cancer agents. Some studies found that MET up-regulated miR-222 expression by targeting PTEN and TIMP3, enhanced tumorigenicity and conferred resistance to Trail-induced cell death of liver and lung cancer cells [27]. Another study demonstrated that miR-222 could regulate cell invasion, growth and radiosensitivity of gastric cells through directly modulating PTEN expression [28,29,30]. These findings showed that inhibition of miR-222 might form a novel therapeutic strategy, not only to sensitize tumor cells to drug-inducing apoptosis but also to inhibit their proliferation, survival and invasive capabilities.
Current therapy for OSCC needs to seek novel targets and less toxic and more effective therapeutics trategies [31,32,33]. In the present study, the luciferase reporter assay validated that PUMA was a direct target of miR-222.We also found that the combination of As-miR-222 transfection with the treatment of CDDP could significantly inhibit the growth of UM1 cells by reducing proliferation and promoting apoptosis. These results indicated that the modulation of miR-222 activity could regulate the expression of PUMA gene and improve sensitization of OSCC cells to CDDP and might represent a novel approach for treating OSCC. These findings also provided new rationales for novel combinational therapies using As-miR-222 to cooperate synergistically with CDDP in patients with OSCC.

4. Experimental Section

4.1. Cell Culture and Transfection

The UM1 cells were obtained from JCRB (Japanese Collection of Research Bioresources) Cell Bank and maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Gibco BRL, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM glutamine, 100 μg of penicillin/mL and 100 μg of streptomycin/mL, and incubated in a humidified 5% CO2 environment at 37 °C. The 2'-OMe-oligonucleotides were chemically synthesized by Gene Pharma Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The oligonucleotides were modified by 2'-OMe to obtain the following sequences: As-miR-222, 5'-ACCCAGUAGCCAGAUGUAGCU-3'; and scramble sequences, 5'-CAGUACUUUUGUGUAGUACAA-3'. UM1 cells were seeded in 6-well plates and incubated at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 environment. Once they were 60% confluent, As-miR-222 and mixed sequences were transfected with Lipofectamine™ RNAiMAX (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the protocol. After 4–6 h, the transfection medium was replaced with fresh medium, and for the combination treatments, cells were incubated with the addition of CDDP. After treatment for two days, cells were divided into five groups, including control, mixed, As-miR-222, CDDP and As-miR-222/CDDP, which were used for further analysis.

4.2. RT-PCR

After treatment for 48 h, total miRNAs and mRNA were extracted with the miRNeasy Mini Kit (Invitrogen) and Total RNA Purification Kit (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RT-PCR was carried out with the use of a reverse transcription kit with U6, and human β-actin was used as the loading control. For the detection of miR-222 and PUMA the SYBR Green PCR assay was conducted, and the primers were as follows: miR-222 (Forward, 5'-ACACTCCAGCTGGGAGCTACATCTGGCTACTG-3'; Reverse, 5'-CTCAACTGGTGTCGTGGA-3'); U6 (Forward, 5'-CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA-3'; Reverse, 5'-AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT-3'); PUMA (Forward, 5'-TGTCGAATAAACGCTTTACAAAC-3'; Reverse, 5'-AACGTTTGTAATGATGGCTTCTG-3'); and β-actin (Forward, 5'-GGTCGGAGTCAACGGATTTGGTCG-3'; Reverse, 5'-CCTCCGACGCCTGCTTCACCAC-3'). Relative expression levels were calculated by the 2−ΔΔCt method [34].

4.3. Western Blot Analysis

After the treatments for 48 h, UM1 cells were washed three times with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and subjected to lysis in a buffer composed of 50 mM Tris-HCl, 5 mM EGTA, and 0.1 mM PMSF for the extraction of cellular proteins. Cell lysates were centrifuged, and the concentration of total proteins was determined with the Enhanced BCA Protein Assay Kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Haimen, China). The samples were mixed with an equal volume of 5× loading buffer, boiled for 5 min and loaded onto 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). After electrophoresis, gels were blotted onto PVDF membrane by electroblotting. The membrane was blocked in TBST (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.2% Tween, 150 mM NaCl) containing 5% non-fat milk for 1 h at room temperature. The blots were then incubated with specific primary antibodies against PUMA, Bcl-2 and GAPDH overnight at 4 °C, followed by secondary IgG antibody for 1 h at room temperature and washed three times with TBST. The membrane was developed with enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagents and visualized in the AlphaView SA system (Zeiss, Dresden, Germany) for 1–15 min. Image J Instrument software (Yihui, Guangdong, China) was used to quantify the bands of specific proteins after normalization with the density of GAPDH.

4.4. Immunofluorescence

UM1 cells were seeded in 24-well plates with 12-mm-diameter cover slips and incubated for 24 h. Cells were then treated with As-miR-222 or CDDP for the indicated time. After 48 h, cells were washed three times with PBS (pH 7.4), fixed in 4% formaldehyde, permeabilized in 0.1% Triton-X-100 and sequentially incubated with the indicated primary antibodies according to manufacturer’s instructions for 18 h. Subsequently, cells were incubated for 1 h with each of the corresponding secondary antibodies, and nuclei were stained with DAPI.

4.5. Cell Viability Assay

UM1 cell viability was evaluated by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazole)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Four thousand cells/well were seeded into 96-well plates and then allowed to attach overnight. After treatment as described above, a 20 μL quantity of MTT (5 mg/mL) was added to each well at 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 and 72 h, and the cells were incubated for 4 h at 37 °C. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 100 μL of DMSO to each well to dissolve the precipitate for 15 min. Optical density (OD) was measured at a wavelength of 570 nm by spectrophotometric analysis. The data were derived from quintuplicate samples of at least three independent experiments.

4.6. Cell Migration Assay

UM1 cells (1 × 104) were transferred to 8-μm-pore inserts after treatment with As-miR-222 and CDDP, and then placed in wells that contained medium with 10% FBS. The non-migrating UM1 cells on the upper surface were harvested after incubation for 12 h, and cells on the lower surface were fixed and counted by microscopy.

4.7. Flow Cytometry

For cell-cycle analysis, treated and control UM1 cells in the log phase of growth were harvested, washed twice in PBS and fixed in 75% alcohol at 4 °C for 24 h. The nuclei of cells were stained with 50 μg/mL propidium iodide (PI) for an additional 40 min at room temperature in the dark. Cells were re-suspended, and cell cycles of different groups were examined by flow cytometry. Results were presented as the percentage of cells in a particular phase.
For apoptosis assay, Annexin V-PI staining was performed and apoptosis was evaluated by flow cytometry. After treatment with As-miR-222 and CDDP, both attached and floating cells were collected and washed with cold PBS and then re-suspended in buffer at a concentration of 106/mL. According to the manufacturer’s protocol, cells were subjected to Annexin V-PI staining and were analyzed by flow cytometry after 15 min incubation in the dark at room temperature.

4.8. Luciferase Assay

The 293T cells which obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Rockvill, MD, USA) were co-transfected with pMIR vectors containing PUMA 3'UTR or mutPUMA 3'UTR and miR-222 mimics. Cells were subjected to lysis, and the lysate was detected with a dual luciferase reporter assay kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol, with a luminometer. Renilla luciferase activity was used for normalization, and firefly luciferase activity was detected.

4.9. Statistical Analysis

Data were presented as means ± standard deviation (SD) of at least three separate experiments. Results were performed with SPSS software 17.0 (SPSS, Shanghai, China) by t-test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). A p-value less than 0.05 was considered to be significant.

5. Conclusions

Our results indicated that the down-regulation of miR-222 could improve the sensitization of oral squamous cell carcinoma UM1 cells to CDDP by boosting the expression of the PUMA gene. These findings suggested that a combination of As-miR-222 and CDDP could be an effective therapeutic strategy for the treatment of OSCC.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (Nos. 81272554 and 81472526), the Guangdong Natural Sciences Foundation (No. S2011020003247) and the Guangdong Sciences and Technology Project (Nos. 2011B050400030 and 2012B031800387).

Author Contributions

The study was conceived and designed by Dongsheng Yu, Fangfang Jiang and Wei Zhao. The experiments were performed by Fangfang Jiang and Wei Zhao. The data were analyzed by Fangfang Jiang, Lijie Zhou, Zifeng Liu and Wenqing Li. The paper was written by Fangfang Jiang and Wei Zhao.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tran, N.; O’Brien, C.J.; Clark, J.; Rose, B. Potential role of micro-RNAs in head and neck tumorigenesis. Head Neck 2010, 32, 1099–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Chiang, W.F.; Hung, P.S.; Liu, S.Y.; Yuan, T.C.; Chang, K.W.; Chen, Y.P.; Liu, Y.C.; Lin, S.C. Increase of ZASC1 gene copy number in recurrent oral carcinoma. Oral Dis. 2011, 17, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Garcia, J.A.; Dreicer, R. Systemic chemotherapy for advanced bladder cancer: Update and controversies. J. Clin. Oncol. 2006, 24, 5545–5551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Childs, G.; Fazzari, M.; Kung, G.; Kawachi, N.; Brandwein-Gensler, M.; McLemore, M.; Chen, Q.; Burk, R.D.; Smith, R.V.; Prystowsky, M.B.; et al. Low-level expression of microRNAs let-7d and miR-205 are prognostic markers of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Am. J. Pathol. 2009, 174, 736–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Liu, C.J.; Tsai, M.M.; Hung, P.S.; Kao, S.Y.; Liu, T.Y.; Wu, K.J.; Chiou, S.H.; Lin, S.C.; Chang, K.W. miR-31 ablates expression of the HIF regulatory factor FIH to activate the HIF pathway in head and neck carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 1635–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Yu, J.; Zhang, L.; Hwang, P.M.; Kinzler, K.W.; Vogelstein, B. PUMA induces the rapid apoptosis of colorectal cancer cells. Mol. Cell 2001, 7, 673–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Altamemi, I.; Murphy, E.A.; Catroppo, J.F.; Zumbrun, E.E.; Zhang, J.; McClellan, J.L.; Singh, U.P.; Nagarkatti, P.S.; Nagarkatti, M. Role of microRNAs in resveratrol-mediated mitigation of colitis-associated tumorigenesis in ApcMin/+mice. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2014, 350, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Skaftnesmo, K.O.; Prestegarden, L.; Micklem, D.R.; Lorens, J.B. MicroRNAs in tumorigenesis. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2007, 8, 320–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Shi, L.; Cheng, Z.; Zhang, J.; Li, R.; Zhao, P.; Fu, Z.; You, Y. hsa-mir-181a and hsa-mir-181b function as tumor suppressors in human glioma cells. Brain Res. 2008, 1236, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Le Sage, C.; Nagel, R.; Egan, D.A.; Schrier, M.; Mesman, E.; Mangiola, A.; Anile, C.; Maira, G.; Mercatelli, N.; Ciafre, S.A.; et al. Regulation of the p27Kip1 tumor suppressor by miR-221 and miR-222 promotes cancer cell proliferation. EMBO J. 2007, 26, 3699–3708. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang, C.; Kang, C.; You, Y.; Pu, P.; Yang, W.; Zhao, P.; Wang, G.; Zhang, A.; Jia, Z.; Han, L.; et al. Co-suppression of miR-221/222 cluster suppresses human glioma cell growth by targeting p27kip1 in vitro and in vivo. Int. J. Oncol. 2009, 34, 1653–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhang, C.Z.; Han, L.; Zhang, A.L.; Fu, Y.C.; Yue, X.; Wang, G.X.; Jia, Z.F.; Pu, P.Y.; Zhang, Q.Y.; Kang, C.S. MicroRNA-221 and microRNA-222 regulate gastric carcinoma cell proliferation and radioresistance by targeting PTEN. BMC Cancer 2010, 10, 367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Jiang, F.; Zhao, W.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, L.; Liu, Z.; Yu, D. miR-222 regulates the cell biological behavior of oral squamous cell carcinoma by targeting PUMA. Oncol. Rep. 2014, 31, 1255–1262. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Nakano, K.; Vousden, K.H. PUMA, a novel proapoptotic gene, is induced by p53. Mol. Cell 2001, 7, 683–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Avila, J.L.; Grundmann, O.; Burd, R.; Limesand, K.H. Radiation-induced salivary gland dysfunction results from p53-dependent apoptosis. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2009, 73, 523–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Labi, V.; Villunger, A. PUMA-mediated tumor suppression: A tale of two stories. Cell Cycle 2010, 9, 4269–4275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Chen, L.; Willis, S.N.; Wei, A.; Smith, B.J.; Fletcher, J.I.; Hinds, M.G.; Colman, P.M.; Day, C.L.; Adams, J.M.; Huang, D.C. Differential targeting of prosurvival Bcl-2 proteins by their BH3-only ligands allows complementary apoptotic function. Mol. Cell 2005, 17, 393–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zhang, C.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, A.; Wang, Y.; Han, L.; You, Y.; Pu, P.; Kang, C. PUMA is a novel target of miR-221/222 in human epithelial cancers. Int. J. Oncol. 2010, 37, 1621–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Joladarashi, D.; Thandavarayan, R.A.; Babu, S.S.; Krishnamurthy, P. Small engine, big power: MicroRNAs as regulators of cardiac diseases and regeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 15891–15911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Zhong, X.; Coukos, G.; Zhang, L. miRNAs in human cancer. Methods Mol. Biol. 2012, 822, 295–306. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Liao, J.; Liu, R.; Yin, L.; Pu, Y. Expression profiling of exosomal miRNAs derived from human esophageal cancer cells by Solexa high-throughput sequencing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 15530–15551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Fujita, M.J.; Sakai, R. Production of avaroferrin and putrebactin by heterologous expression of a deep-sea metagenomic DNA. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 4799–4809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Tahiri, A.; Leivonen, S.K.; Luders, T.; Steinfeld, I.; RagleAure, M.; Geisler, J.; Makela, R.; Nord, S.; Riis, M.L.; Yakhini, Z.; et al. Deregulation of cancer-related miRNAs is a common event in both benign and malignant human breast tumors. Carcinogenesis 2014, 35, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Miller, T.E.; Ghoshal, K.; Ramaswamy, B.; Roy, S.; Datta, J.; Shapiro, C.L.; Jacob, S.; Majumder, S. MicroRNA-221/222 confers tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer by targeting p27Kip1. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 29897–29903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kovalchuk, O.; Filkowski, J.; Meservy, J.; Ilnytskyy, Y.; Tryndyak, V.P.; Chekhun, V.F.; Pogribny, I.P. Involvement of microRNA-451 in resistance of the MCF-7 breast cancer cells to chemotherapeutic drug doxorubicin. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2008, 7, 2152–2159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Pan, Y.Z.; Morris, M.E.; Yu, A.M. MicroRNA-328 negatively regulates the expression of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2) in human cancer cells. Mol. Pharmacol. 2009, 75, 1374–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Garofalo, M.; di Leva, G.; Romano, G.; Nuovo, G.; Suh, S.S.; Ngankeu, A.; Taccioli, C.; Pichiorri, F.; Alder, H.; Secchiero, P.; et al. miR-221&222 regulate TRAIL resistance and enhance tumorigenicity through PTEN and TIMP3 downregulation. Cancer Cell 2009, 16, 498–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zhang, C.; Han, L.; Zhang, A.; Yang, W.; Zhou, X.; Pu, P.; Du, Y.; Zeng, H.; Kang, C. Global changes of mRNA expression reveals an increased activity of the interferon-induced signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway by repression of miR-221/222 in glioblastoma U251 cells. Int. J. Oncol. 2010, 36, 1503–1512. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Zhang, C.Z.; Zhang, J.X.; Zhang, A.L.; Shi, Z.D.; Han, L.; Jia, Z.F.; Yang, W.D.; Wang, G.X.; Jiang, T.; You, Y.P.; et al. MiR-221 and miR-222 target PUMA to induce cell survival in glioblastoma. Mol. Cancer 2010, 9, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. John-Aryankalayil, M.; Palayoor, S.T.; Cerna, D.; Simone, C.B.; Falduto, M.T.; Magnuson, S.R.; Coleman, C.N. Fractionated radiation therapy can induce a molecular profile for therapeutic targeting. Radiat. Res. 2010, 174, 446–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. De Tullio, G.; de Fazio, V.; Sgherza, N.; Minoia, C.; Serrati, S.; Merchionne, F.; Loseto, G.; Iacobazzi, A.; Rana, A.; Petrillo, P.; et al. Challenges and opportunities of microRNAs in lymphomas. Molecules 2014, 19, 14723–14781. [Google Scholar]
  32. Marignol, L.; Robson, T.; McCarthy, H.O.; Worthington, J.; Murray, M.M.; Hollywood, D.; Lawler, M.; Hirst, D.G. The tissue plasminogen activator gene promoter: A novel tool for radiogenic gene therapy of the prostate? J. Gene Med. 2008, 10, 1032–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Granados Lopez, A.J.; Lopez, J.A. Multistep model of cervical cancer: Participation of miRNAs and coding genes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 15700–15733. [Google Scholar]
  34. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCt method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiang, F.; Zhao, W.; Zhou, L.; Liu, Z.; Li, W.; Yu, D. MiR-222 Targeted PUMA to Improve Sensitization of UM1 Cells to Cisplatin. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 22128-22141. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms151222128

AMA Style

Jiang F, Zhao W, Zhou L, Liu Z, Li W, Yu D. MiR-222 Targeted PUMA to Improve Sensitization of UM1 Cells to Cisplatin. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2014; 15(12):22128-22141. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms151222128

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jiang, Fangfang, Wei Zhao, Lijie Zhou, Zifeng Liu, Wenqing Li, and Dongsheng Yu. 2014. "MiR-222 Targeted PUMA to Improve Sensitization of UM1 Cells to Cisplatin" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 15, no. 12: 22128-22141. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms151222128

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop