Next Article in Journal
Next Article in Special Issue
Previous Article in Journal
Previous Article in Special Issue

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14(3), 4854-4884; doi:10.3390/ijms14034854

Review
Mitogen-Activated Protein (MAP) Kinase Scaffolding Proteins: A Recount
Melanie Meister 1, Ana Tomasovic 2, Antje Banning 1 and Ritva Tikkanen 1,*
1
Institute of Biochemistry, Medical Faculty, University of Giessen, Friedrichstrasse 24, 35392 Giessen, Germany; E-Mails: melanie.meister@biochemie.med.uni-giessen.de (M.M.); antje.banning@biochemie.med.uni-giessen.de (A.B.)
2
Department of Molecular Hematology, University of Frankfurt, Medical School, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; E-Mail: tomasovic@med.uni-frankfurt.de
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: ritva.tikkanen@biochemie.med.uni-giessen.de; Tel.: +49-641-9947-420; Fax: +49-641-9947-429.
Received: 21 January 2013; in revised form: 17 February 2013 / Accepted: 21 February 2013 /
Published: 1 March 2013

Abstract

: The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway is the canonical signaling pathway for many receptor tyrosine kinases, such as the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor. Downstream of the receptors, this pathway involves the activation of a kinase cascade that culminates in a transcriptional response and affects processes, such as cell migration and adhesion. In addition, the strength and duration of the upstream signal also influence the mode of the cellular response that is switched on. Thus, the same components can in principle coordinate opposite responses, such as proliferation and differentiation. In recent years, it has become evident that MAPK signaling is regulated and fine-tuned by proteins that can bind to several MAPK signaling proteins simultaneously and, thereby, affect their function. These so-called MAPK scaffolding proteins are, thus, important coordinators of the signaling response in cells. In this review, we summarize the recent advances in the research on MAPK/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathway scaffolders. We will not only review the well-known members of the family, such as kinase suppressor of Ras (KSR), but also put a special focus on the function of the recently identified or less studied scaffolders, such as fibroblast growth factor receptor substrate 2, flotillin-1 and mitogen-activated protein kinase organizer 1.
Keywords:
mitogen-activated protein kinase; signal transduction; growth factor; receptor tyrosine kinase; scaffolding proteins; cancer

1. MAP Kinase Signaling Cascade

1.1. Components of the MAPK/ERK Signaling Cascade

The process of signal transduction through receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) starts with an extracellular stimulus that activates its designated receptor and, thereby, initiates downstream signaling mechanisms. This can be established by a sequential phosphorylation of a three-tier kinase cascade, which conveys the signal to the nucleus, where a cellular response can be transcriptionally mounted. Protein kinases catalyze the transfer of a γ-phosphoryl group from ATP to a hydroxyl-group of a serine, threonine or tyrosine residue in the substrate protein. They are named after their substrate specificity, i.e., protein serine/threonine kinases, including dual specificity kinases, protein tyrosine kinases and tyrosine kinase-like proteins [1]. Since phosphorylation is a reversible process, phosphatases provide the counterpart to kinases [2].

A prime example for such a kinase cascade is the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, an evolutionarily highly conserved signaling mode that controls fundamental cellular processes, such as proliferation, cellular survival and differentiation. A deregulation of one component in this cascade can result in aberrant signaling events associated with a pathological outcome, e.g., cancerogenesis. Three protein families are central to this pathway, i.e., the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) family, the p38 kinase family and the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) family. The MAPK cascade itself is shaped by three major constituents that form the so-called “three-tiers”, MAPK kinase kinase (MAP3K), MAPK kinase (MAP2K) and MAPK (Figure 1). In addition, several other regulators, activators and scaffolding proteins can affect this cascade. Downstream of MAPK, both cytosolic and nuclear substrates can be phosphorylated. Located upstream of the MAPK tiers are, e.g., the transmembrane RTKs, integrins and G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR), which, upon activation, initiate the downstream signaling and therewith successively recruit the MAPK components to signalosomes. Ligand binding to monomeric transmembrane RTKs, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), induces receptor dimerization [3] and results in transphosphorylation of the receptor molecules [4,5]. The link between the activated, phosphorylated EGFR and the GTPase Ras (p21), which resides immediately upstream of the starting point of the MAPK pathway, is established by two proteins, growth factor receptor-bound protein 2 (Grb2) and son of sevenless homologue (Sos) [69]. The adapter protein Grb2 utilizes its Src homology (SH) domains to bind to the phosphorylated tyrosine 1068 of EGFR (SH2 domains), as well as to a poly-proline region in Sos (SH3 domain) [10,11]. Sos is a guanine exchange factor (GEF) for Ras [1214], whose GTP loading is essential for the Ras-dependent activation of the MAPK pathway, since dominant negative Ras mutants are unable to activate downstream signaling [15]. The GTP-bound, active form of Ras then directly binds to the Ras-binding domain (RBD) of the serine/threonine kinase Raf [1620] and recruits it to the plasma membrane [2123]. Inactive Raf is bound to a regulatory protein, 14-3-3, in the cytosol [24], but upon Ras-induced membrane recruitment, Raf is released from 14-3-3 [25].

Three different isoforms of the MAP3K Raf exist, namely C-Raf (also known as Raf-1), A-Raf and B-Raf, which provide the first tier in the MAPK cascade. Although Ras is involved in the canonical Raf activation, it is not essential for MAPK signaling. Some signaling pathways, e.g., protein kinase C (PKC) signaling, which can be activated with phorbol myristyl acetate (PMA), result in Raf activation without the requirement for the preceding activation of Ras [26,27]. Similar to a dominant-negative Ras, blocking Raf activity, e.g., by expressing a dominant negative mutant, results in an impairment of the activation of the MAPK pathway upon growth factor stimulation [28].

Upon its activation, Raf transmits the signal further downstream to MEK1/2 (MAPK/ERK kinases 1 and 2), which are the second tier in the MAPK cascade. MEK1/2 (also known as p45/p46) are activated by Raf-mediated phosphorylation at Ser218 and Ser222 (hMEK1) [2932]. MEK1 and MEK2 are highly homologous dual specificity kinases, which are capable of phosphorylating both tyrosine and serine/threonine residues [33]. Astoundingly, however, their only known substrates are the MAPK ERK1/2 (p44/p42). MEK1/2 phosphorylate human ERK1 within the Thr202-Xaa-Tyr204 motif [3436]. Activated ERK1/2 are released from MEK1/2 and either phosphorylate target substrates in the cytosol or translocate to the nucleus [3739]. In contrast to MEK1/2, ERK1/2 have a plethora of substrates and are, therefore, effectors of many cellular processes, e.g., differentiation and proliferation [40,41].

1.2. Function and Regulation of ERK

There are eight isoforms of the MAPK ERK, ERK1-8. In this review, we focus on ERK1 and ERK2, as their function has been extensively characterized and they represent typical components of the canonical MAPK signaling pathway. ERK1/2 are serine/threonine protein kinases [42] that prefer to phosphorylate their substrates at Ser/Thr-Pro motifs [43,44]. Recently, novel ERK1 splice variants that are cell-type specific and less abundant were described [45,46]. Due to their high degree of homology, ERK1 and ERK2 have been suggested to share most of their functions. Stimulation of cells generally results in activation of both ERK1 and ERK2, and it is, thus, under debate whether ERK1 and ERK2 are functionally redundant when expressed in the same cell type or if they can indeed exert different functions [4752]. Lefloch et al. suggested that functional differences between ERK1 and ERK2 would depend on their expression levels [48]. Von Thun et al. used a model system for tumor invasiveness to show that depletion of ERK2 impairs invasive migration of the cells. Strikingly, the invasive motility could only be rescued by ERK2, but not by ERK1, again implicating that the two ERK proteins exhibit functional differences [53]. However, the most striking hints for the distinct functions of ERK1 and ERK2 came from the respective knockout mice. While ERK1−/− mice are viable and exhibit relatively minor defects, e.g., in thymocyte differentiation [54], ERK2−/− mice already die at the embryonic stage, E8.5 [55]. This implies that in the ERK2 knockout mice, ERK1 is not able to compensate for the loss of ERK2. However, it has not been clarified if this is due to a lack of redundancy or a missing expression of ERK1 in certain cell types in the ERK2 knockout mice and, thus, failure to compensate for the non-existing ERK2 activity.

The subcellular localization of inactive and active ERK1/2 reflects their broad functional effects. About 10–20 min after the cells are exposed to a growth factor/mitogen, active ERK1/2 translocate to the nucleus, where they induce gene expression and facilitate cell cycle entry. It is still under debate whether ERK translocates to the nucleus as a homodimer or in its monomeric form [3739,5658]. The nuclear translocation of ERK is either facilitated by passive diffusion or by an active transport mechanism [59]. The active translocation of ERK to the nucleus requires phosphorylation of two serines within its nuclear translocation signal (NTS), which is mediated by casein kinase 2 (CK2), binding to importin-7 and phosphorylation of nucleoporin 50 (NUP50) [6063]. Recently, another protein of the nuclear pore complex, TPR (translocated promoter region) was identified as an ERK2 substrate that influences nuclear translocation of ERK2 [64,65]. ERK is involved in several nuclear processes, including transcriptional regulation of gene expression. Transcription factors, such as the Ets-domain containing protein, Elk-1, can be phosphorylated by ERK1/2 [6669], and the phosphorylated Elk-1 then initiates the transcription of immediate-early response genes (IEG), such as c-Fos [70,71]. Fos itself is able to subsequently activate delayed early genes (DEG), including the dual specificity Thr/Tyr MAPK phosphatase 6 (DUSP6). Together with some other members of the DUSP family, DUSP6 is known to dephosphorylate ERK1/2 with high specificity and, thus, functions as a negative feedback regulator of MAPK signaling [7274].

ERK1/2 do not only enhance gene transcription, but can also act as transcriptional suppressors by phosphorylating the Ets2 repressor factor (ERF) [75]. Furthermore, ERK1/2 can target and activate several nuclear receptors, e.g., estrogen receptor (ER), a receptor upregulated in breast cancer [76,77], or peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), a receptor involved in diabetes and obesity [78]. In addition, ERK1/2 regulate chromatin remodeling by activating DNA-binding proteins like poly-ADP-ribose polymerase 1 (PARP-1) [79] and modulate histone modification by phosphorylating mitogen and stress activated protein kinases 1 and 2 (MSK1/2) [8082]. However, the activation of PARP-1 was shown to be independent of ERK2 kinase activity, as such; yet, it seems to depend on an active, phosphorylated ERK [79]. PARP-1 itself has been discussed to be an anchoring protein that would keep ERK in the nucleus and, thereby, facilitate the interaction of ERK with Elk-1 [79,83].

In addition to the manifold substrates of ERK in the nucleus, it also has cytosolic substrates and localizes to other subcellular compartments, such as endosomes, via the MP1-p14 complex, and mitochondria, via voltage-dependent anion channel 1, VDAC1 [8488]. In the cytosol, ERK1/2 have several substrates, some of which will be discussed below. For a more detailed discussion of the topic, please see the recent reviews [41,89]. Recently, Asano et al. described the actin-binding protein, palladin, as a novel substrate for ERK and suggested an anti-migratory function for ERK [90]. Another cytosolic substrate and a scaffolder of ERK is paxillin, a protein found to associate with focal adhesion kinase (FAK) in focal adhesions upon stimulation of cells with hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and to enhance cell spreading and adhesion [91]. Amongst the first described cytosolic substrates of ERK is the family of 90 kDa ribosomal S6 kinases (RSK), a group of Ser/Thr kinases. These proteins are downstream effectors of the MAPK cascade and involved in several cellular processes, e.g., cellular proliferation and differentiation [92,93].

The MAPK cascade is a multifaceted pathway that is involved in a plethora of cellular processes. A deregulation of this pathway results in pathologies, for instance, in cancerogenesis. Regarding the substrate specificities within this pathway, ERK and MEK are in great contrast to each other. While ERK1/2 are the only described substrates of MEK1/2 so far, ERK1/2 has a myriad of substrates in the cytosol and the nucleus. Therefore, a constant feedback mediated regulation of this pathway is important. There are two different regulatory mechanisms: a positive feedback mechanism, which results in an increase in ERK signaling, and a negative feedback mechanism by which ERK signaling is limited and returned to a basal level. For example, ERK1/2 is able to phosphorylate MEK1 at Thr292 and Thr386 in vitro[94,95]. In vivo, ERK1/2 phosphorylates MEK1 as part of a negative feedback regulation during integrin and growth factor signaling [94,96]. Recently, formation of MEK1-MEK2 heterodimers was reported, which was found to be negatively regulated by ERK1/2 by phosphorylation of Thr292 in MEK1, a residue that is not present in MEK2 [97]. Another ERK1/2 mediated negative feedback regulation is the phosphorylation of Sos, which in turn interferes with the interaction of Sos and Grb2 [98]. In general, negative regulators of kinase activities are phosphatases. In particular, dual specificity Thr/Tyr MAPK phosphatases (DUSPs or MKPs) display a negative effect on ERK1/2 activity (for a review on DUSPs, please see [99]). Like ERK1/2, DUSPs can localize to both the cytosol and nucleus. For example, DUSP1 itself is a substrate of ERK1/2. However, phosphorylation stabilizes nuclear DUSP1, which ultimately can lead to a dephosphorylation of ERK1/2 [100,101]. On the other hand, cytosolic ERK1/2 phosphorylate DUSP6 on Ser159 and Ser197 and target it for proteasomal degradation, providing a positive feedback on MAPK signaling [102]. Aside from nuclear regulators of ERK, Sef is an example of a subcellular regulator of ERK, which is associated with membrane ruffles and the Golgi. Sef blocks the nuclear translocation of ERK1/2 by binding it when it is still in complex with MEK1/2 and, thus, inhibits the dissociation of ERK and MEK [103105].

2. MAP Kinase Scaffolders

2.1. MAPK Scaffolding Proteins—An Introduction

The model postulating a free diffusion of signaling components in the cytosol comes along with several disadvantages (Figure 2). The probability for two consecutive kinases to meet in the cytosol is fairly low, and diffusion based signaling would be extremely inefficient. In addition, the signal needs to be transmitted to the corresponding subcellular region. Therefore, scaffolding proteins support signaling partners in propagating the signal and in directing it to the correct cellular location. Scaffolds are defined as proteins with several domains that bind two or more components of a signaling pathway simultaneously. They bring signaling partners in close proximity to each other, link them in a multi-enzyme complex and facilitate their functional interaction. Within this complex, the kinases are shielded from the deactivating phosphatases, and interference with other signaling cascades is minimized [106,107]. Since not all stimuli result in the same cellular response, different scaffolds anchor the signaling modules, with the assistance of various adapter proteins, to specific subcellular regions and enhance the signaling by providing a platform for the interaction with their respective substrates. Altogether, scaffolds enable a plethora of signaling variations by linking the same core kinases in a different subset of reaction partners, substrates and cellular surroundings.

One main characteristic of scaffolds is combinatorial inhibition, an effect first described for the ERK/MAPK scaffold kinase suppressor of Ras (KSR) [108]. Combinatorial inhibition describes the stoichiometry of a scaffold and its signaling partners [109,110]. If the scaffold concentration is too low, the scaffold-dependent-enhanced binding of the kinase and its substrate is not given and, thus, the signaling is below optimum. On the contrary, if the scaffold is in excess, the kinase and its substrate will each bind to an individual scaffold. Hence, downstream signaling is impaired in the absence of a productive interaction. It is in most cases largely unknown how scaffolds themselves are regulated. In a recent review, Dard and Peter discuss mechanisms and modifications that seem to play a regulatory role during scaffold turnover. These mechanisms include oligomerization, conformational activation, nucleocytoplasmic shuttling and phosphorylation [111].

The first MAPK scaffold described was the yeast Ste5p protein. However, in this review, we will focus on MAPK/ERK scaffolds in mammalian cells, and thus, Ste5p, as well as the scaffolds of the JNK MAPK pathway, will not be discussed. For Ste5p and JNK scaffolds, we refer to some recent reviews on these topics [112114]. Several scaffolding proteins for the ERK/MAPK cascade have been described, with KSR (kinase suppressor of Ras) and ß-arrestin being probably the best known ones. Lately, some proteins with scaffolding characteristics have been described, such as connector enhancer of KSR 1 and 2 (CNK1/2) and IQ motif containing GTPase-activating protein 1 (IQGAP1). However, these proteins appear to bind only to some of the core kinases of the MAPK pathway and are, thus, considered to be “nested scaffolds” [115]. IQGAP1, a multidomain protein with several protein interaction motifs, was shown to interact with B-Raf, C-Raf, MEK1/2 and ERK1/2 [116119]. In fact, IQGAP1 appears to be necessary for the growth factor-dependent activation of B-Raf [117] and to promote a MEK1-dependent signaling pathway [118,119]. In the following part, we will summarize the established ERK scaffolding proteins, such as KSR1, MEK-binding partner 1 (MP1) and ß-arrestin, but also shed light on some less studied or recently identified scaffolding proteins, such as mitogen-activated protein kinase organizer 1 (MORG1), fibroblast growth factor receptor substrate 2 (FRS2) and flotillin-1.

2.2. Kinase Suppressor of Ras

Initially identified in genetic screens in Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans as a modifier of activated Ras, KSR1 was found to be a positive regulator of MAPK signaling and represents one of the best characterized MAPK scaffolders so far [120123]. In D. melanogaster, only a single ksr gene is present, which is essential for the viability of the organism. On the other hand, in mammals and C. elegans, two proteins, KSR1 and KSR2, are present and display a functional redundancy [122,124,125]. Whereas the loss of KSR is embryonically lethal in D. melanogaster, the loss of KSR1 has little effect in C. elegans[120123]. Similarly, KSR1 knockout mice are viable and without any major developmental defects [126,127], suggesting a large degree of functional redundancy of the KSR isoforms. Functional implications for KSR1 were acquired by the fact that these mice display defects in T-cell activation and neuronal signaling [128,129] and a decrease in tumor formation caused by polyomavirus middle T (MT) or by treatment with 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) [127,128]. Furthermore, in the absence of KSR1, the induction of arthritis is impaired [130] and KSR1 knockout mice have enlarged adipocytes, indicating a possible role of KSR1 in adipogenesis [131]. The ksr1−/− mice are modestly glucose intolerant. Although they show a normal response to exogenous insulin, they display a three-fold increase in serum insulin levels in response to glucose challenge [126], demonstrating another important role of KSR1 in insulin-regulated glucose metabolism. Most importantly, in KSR1 knockout mice, the high molecular weight complexes containing KSR, MEK and ERK are lost [128]. All this unravels KSR1 as a molecular scaffold that is not strictly required for, but rather enhances, signaling via the MAPK signaling pathway.

KSR1 is able to bind all three kinases of the MAPK pathway. Whereas it constitutively associates with MEK, it interacts with C-Raf and ERK only upon growth factor stimulation [132,133]. With this, it enables MEK to come in close proximity to the Raf kinase at the plasma membrane, which executes its phosphorylation. The domain organization of KSR proteins is similar to that of the Raf proteins, comprising five conserved regions, termed CA1–CA5. The CA1 domain of Drosophila KSR was shown to bind D-Raf (reviewed in [134]), but this region is absent from the KSR proteins of C. elegans. CA2 contains a proline rich region, whereas CA3 is a cysteine rich, atypical C1 domain, displaying homology to the one found in Raf proteins. The CA3 domain regulates the cellular localization of KSR and Raf by assisting in the membrane anchorage following growth factor stimulation or Ras activation [135]. Finally, the CA5 domain is closely related to the kinase domain of Raf proteins and seems to be important for constitutive interaction with MEK [108,136138]. Upon its discovery, KSR1 was considered to be a pseudokinase that lacks catalytic activity, and up to date, the evidence for its catalytic activity is not completely unambiguous [123,135,137,139142]. The lack of catalytic activity of KSR was suggested to rely on the fact that an invariant Lys residue, which is important for orienting ATP in Raf [143], is exchanged for an Arg in KSR1, and despite its similar character, the Arg seemed not to be able to complement the Lys as a catalytic residue [144]. However, recent studies have provided some experimental evidence for the catalytic activity of both KSR1 and KSR2 [145,146]. A KSR1 mutant that is not capable of binding ATP, but associates with both C-Raf and MEK1, fails to activate MEK1, implicating that KSR1 catalytic activity, or at least its ATP binding capability, is required for MEK1 phosphorylation [146]. Furthermore, recent findings have suggested that recombinantly expressed, purified wild-type KSR1, but not its mutant form, is capable of phosphorylating MEK1 in vitro[140]. It has been suggested that Raf kinases are important for the kinase activity of KSR by their virtue of binding to KSR and allosterically stimulating its catalytic activity. Hu et al. have recently shown that MEK1 phosphorylation by KSR1/C-Raf heterodimers requires KSR activity and cooperation with C-Raf [146]. Likewise, a kinase-deficient form of B-Raf was capable of stimulating MEK1 phosphorylation by KSR2, implicating that Raf activity may not be a prerequisite for MEK phosphorylation in this complex [145]. Thus, although these data suggest that KSR may be catalytically active, this appears to require some kind of cooperation, and most likely, dimerization with Raf kinases and the molecular details of KSR regulation will surely be an important aspect of future research.

Depending on its phosphorylation state, KSR1 is found to be localized at the plasma membrane or in the cytoplasm. As with Raf, KSR is held in the cytoplasm by the bound 14-3-3 protein, but it translocates from the cytoplasm to the plasma membrane upon treatment with growth factors in a process regulated by Cdc25C-associated kinase 1 (C-TAK1). C-TAK1 is constitutively associated with KSR1 and phosphorylates its Ser392 residue. Since Ser392 is the site that mediates the binding to 14-3-3 proteins, phosphorylation of this residue by C-TAK1 governs cytoplasmic sequestration of KSR1 in unstimulated cells [133]. Upon growth factor stimulus, Ser/Thr protein phosphatase PP2A dephosphorylates KSR1 on the critical Ser392 residue, resulting in displacement of 14-3-3 and release of the inhibition imposed by 14-3-3. Thus, KSR1 is now free to promote MAPK pathway activation [147].

Apart from 14-3-3, another KSR1 inhibitor has been identified. IMP (impedes mitogenic signal propagation) inhibits signal propagation by disrupting KSR1 homo-oligomerization, which is necessary to join Raf with its substrate, since it seems that different complexes of KSR1-MEK, KSR1-C-Raf and KSR1-B-Raf exist in the cells (reviewed in [148]). Thus, IMP acts as a signal threshold regulator and uncouples C-Raf from KSR1 complexes [149].

2.3. MEK Partner 1/p14 Complex

As already mentioned, the three tiers of the MAPK signaling cascade are initially activated at the plasma membrane. However, at later stages, the complexes are present in endosomes, which is required to achieve a proper signaling response. It seems that the endocytosis of the activated receptors and their associated signaling complexes is crucial for maximal MAPK activation, and activated Ras, C-Raf, MEK1 and ERK1 can be found on endosomes [138,150153]. The reasons for the presence of the second MAPK activation phase, which takes place at the so-called signaling endosome, might be multiple. Endocytosis might enable a more controlled spatio-temporal resolution of the signaling cascade. Furthermore, it might also shield the signal during transmission over long distances, whereas slow protein diffusion and rapid protein dephosphorylation might interfere with it.

MEK partner 1 (MP1) is a widely expressed small protein that was originally identified in a yeast-two hybrid screen using MEK1 as a bait and was correspondingly named after its ability to bind to MEK1 [85]. MP1 facilitates a transient binding of MEK1 to ERK1, thereby enhancing the activation of the MAPK signaling cascade, but it does not bind MEK2 or ERK2 [85]. The group of Huber identified the scaffold protein MP1 as a putative interaction partner of p14, which is a highly conserved protein of 14 kDa [86]. In different cell types, p14 was found to be localized at the cytosolic face of the late endosomes/lysosomes [86]. The interaction of MP1 with p14 was found to be important for the localization of the MP1-MAPK scaffold complex to late endosomes/lysosomes during the second sustained phase of MAPK signaling [154]. However, p14 was found to interact with MEK1 and ERK1 only indirectly via MP1, despite the incredibly similar structures of p14 and MP1, exhibiting a five stranded beta sheet flanked on each side by three helices [155].

Depletion of p14 and MP1 led to a pronounced inhibition of the MAPK signaling pathway. Interestingly, reduced ERK activation during the later stages of signaling was observed, while the early phase of ERK activation at the plasma membrane was unaffected. However, overexpression of p14 was not sufficient to inhibit MAPK signaling, pointing to the fact that p14 does not disrupt the formation of signaling complexes in the way a highly overexpressed MP1 or other scaffolds do [154].

Consistent with its role in endosomal localization of MP1, p14 knockdown resulted in a mislocalization of MP1-MAPK scaffold complexes from late endosomes to the cytoplasm. However, p14 does not contain clearly identifiable membrane localization signals, yet it appears to be important for the localization of the complex in the membranes. Later findings have shown that the endosomal localization of MP1/p14 complexes is facilitated by a small adaptor protein, p18, which is associated with lipid rafts by means of myristoylation and palmitoylation [84]. Interestingly, endosomal dynamics and endosomal association of MP1/p14 complexes were inhibited in cells depleted of p18. Mice lacking p18 expression show an early embryonic lethality due to an impairment of the development of the visceral endoderm and the resulting growth arrest. Cell lines established from the p18 knockout embryos display severe abnormalities in the endosomal/lysosomal compartments, associated with peripheral scattering of the normally perinuclear endosomal compartments. Since p18 is required for the endosomal localization of the MAPK scaffolding complex, MP1/p14, these data suggest that endosome-associated MAPK signaling may play a role in the regulation of the biogenesis of endosomes and lysosomes. Highly intriguingly, a mutation in the 3′ untranslated region of the p14 mRNA that results in reduced p14 expression was found to cause a human genetic disease that manifests as a primary immunodeficiency associated with albinism, short stature and defects in B-cell and cytotoxic T-cell function [156]. In fibroblasts lacking p14 expression, ERK phosphorylation was reduced, in line with the function of p14 in MAPK signaling. It appears that the molecular mechanisms of this disease rely on impairment of the function and cellular localization of lysosome-like organelles, again underscoring the importance of endosomal MAPK signaling in the biogenesis of lysosome-related organelles. However, not only in humans, but also in mice, an efficient MAPK signal transduction through the p14/MP1 complex appears to be important in the regulation of tissue homeostasis. Since a constitutive genetic ablation of p14 is embryonically lethal, conditional knockout mice lacking the expression of p14 in the epidermis were created. The live born mice die shortly after birth due to severe skin defects and rapid dehydration, reflecting the compromised terminal differentiation of the epidermis [157]. However, recent findings of the Sabatini group have revealed an unexpected role of the MP1/p14/p18 complex in signaling through the mammalian target of the Rapamycin (mTOR) pathway [158]. It was shown that this complex targets mTOR to lysosomes and is a prerequisite for amino acid-induced mTOR signaling. In light of these findings, one should thus be cautious when interpreting the results of gene knockdown or knockout studies of MP1/p14/p18 complex proteins, as the observed effect may well be due to impairment of both MAPK and mTOR signaling pathways.

2.4. β-Arrestins

The multifunctional adaptor proteins, ß-arrestins, were originally discovered as proteins that desensitize or terminate G protein coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling. Upon ligand stimulation, GPCRs are phosphorylated by the family of GPCR kinases (GRKs), and this event promotes the recruitment of ß-arrestins to the GPCRs. Consequently, the interaction with ß-arrestins sterically prevents a further coupling of GPRCs with the trimeric G proteins and disrupts the normal activation of the second messenger signaling cascade [159,160]. Later on, several other signaling pathways, e.g., Hedgehog, Wingless, Notch and TGFß pathways, were found to exploit the scaffolding functions of ß-arrestins (reviewed in [161]).

Four members of the ß-arrestin family have been described so far, and they show different, but overlapping, expression patterns. Arrestin 2 (ß-arrestin 1) and arrestin 3 (ß-arrestin 2) are ubiquitously expressed, whereas arrestin 1 (visual ß-arrestin) is localized to retinal rods and cones and arrestin 4 (X-arrestin) is found only in retinal cones. All four members are highly similar, sharing 70% sequence identity, and they are highly conserved across species (reviewed in [162]).

In addition to their role as desensitizers of GPCR signaling, ß-arrestins have been shown to mediate the clathrin-dependent endocytosis of seven transmembrane spanning receptors and to act as adaptors for different E3 ubiquitin ligases [163166]. One of these is the E3 ligase, Mdm2, which catalyzes the ubiquitination of the ß2 adrenergic receptor (ß2AR) and of ß-arrestin 2 itself. Ubiquitination of ß2AR was found to be important for its degradation. Furthermore, ubiquitination of ß-arrestin 2 is indispensable for receptor internalization, since ubiquitinated ß-arrestin 2 is able to recruit certain components of the endocytic machinery, such as clathrin and activating protein 2 (AP-2) [165,167]. Moreover, the ubiquitination status of ß-arrestin 2 governs its association to the ß2AR and determines the stability of the ß-arrestin/GPCR complex. Permanently ubiquitinated ß-arrestin 2 does not dissociate from ß2AR, but internalizes with it to endosomes, whereas binding of the ß-arrestin 2 to the receptor is significantly increased after inhibition of deubiquitinating enzymes [164].

Following ß2 adrenergic receptor activation, the MAPK signaling cascade is activated in a biphasic way. The first phase of the activation is rapid and transient, with the signal peaking 2–5 min after stimulation. The second sustained phase is slower, lasting up to 30 min. The signal peaks 5–10 min after stimulation, and this phase of MAPK activation was found to be mediated by ß-arrestins [168,169]. ß-arrestins can scaffold all three kinases (C-Raf, MEK1 and ERK1/2) of the MAPK signaling cascade, facilitating the phosphorylation and activation of ERK1/2 and, at the same time, retaining ERK1/2 in the cytosol and prolonging the signaling events [152,170,171]. On the other hand, ß-arrestin is subjected to a negative feedback mechanism, during which active ERK phosphorylates its crucial Ser412 residue [172]. Cytosolic ß-arrestin is constitutively phosphorylated at this residue. Rapid dephosphorylation of Ser412 takes place upon agonist stimulation when ß-arrestin is recruited to the plasma membrane. Although it was found not to be required for receptor binding and receptor desensitization, dephosphorylation of Ser412 was shown to be essential for clathrin binding and receptor internalization [173]. Apart from ERK, ß-arrestin 2 was found to facilitate the activation of another MAPK, JNK3, by acting as a scaffold that brings together angiotensin II type 1A (AT1A) receptor, JNK3 and its upstream kinases, ASK1 and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 4 (MKK4), and clustering them together on endosomal structures after treatment with angiotensin II. Similarly to ERK, phosphorylated, active JNK3 then accumulates in the cytosol [174].

Having in mind all the aforementioned roles that ß-arrestins play in different signaling pathways, one would expect significant developmental defects after genetic ablation of the arrestins. However, ß-arrestin 1 knockout mice develop normally, but display increased cardiac contractility in response to adrenergic receptor agonists [175]. Similarly, ß-arrestin 2 knockout mice are viable and develop normally. Nevertheless, after administration of morphine, a prolonged analgesic effect in the knockout mice was observed. This was shown to be due to misregulated internalization and desensitization of the μ opioid receptor [176]. Although the single knockout mice models for ß-arrestin 1 and 2 appear healthy and normal, unless challenged, one can assume that ß-arrestins are functionally not completely interchangeable [161,177]. However, they can functionally compensate for each other in the developing mouse embryo to allow a normal development.

2.5. Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor Substrate 2

FRS2 owes its name to the major and the first described function of this protein as a substrate for the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor [178], although it has later been shown to be an important docking protein for many different RTKs [178183]. FRS2 regulates downstream signaling by forming molecular complexes with other adaptor proteins and tyrosine phosphatases, and it seems to be a critical mediator of sustained ERK activity [184]. Its molecular structure is identical to the homologous protein, FRS3. On their N-terminus, both FRS proteins contain a putative myristoylation site, which is important for their membrane localization [178]. This sequence is followed by a phosphotyrosine binding domain, an anchor for binding to specific peptides of certain receptor tyrosine kinases with or without tyrosine phosphorylated residues [185]. For example, the binding to neurotrophin receptors TrkA and TrkB is dependent on the activation of the specific receptor and mediated by the tyrosine phosphorylated peptides [185187]. In contrast, FRS binding to the FGF receptor is constitutive and involves unphosphorylated amino acids at the juxtamembrane domain of the FGF receptor [185,188]. The C-terminus of FRS proteins contains multiple tyrosine phosphorylation sites (six Tyr residues in FRS2 and five Tyr residues in FRS3). These residues, when phosphorylated by specific RTKs, recruit SH2-domain containing proteins, such as the adaptor protein, Grb2, and protein tyrosine phosphatase Shp2 [178,189]. The recruitment of Grb2 will eventually result in a strong activation of phosphatidylinositide 3 (PI3) kinase signaling pathway and a moderate activation of ERK signaling [189,190], whereas the recruitment of Shp2 causes a strong activation of the ERK signaling pathway [189]. Furthermore, FRS2 does not only function as a platform for the recruitment of proteins responsible for signal activation, but also for those involved in signal attenuation. Its scaffolding function enables Cbl, an ubiquitin ligase for RTKs, to come in close proximity of the FGF receptor. Cbl then ubiquitinates both the FGF receptor and FRS2 and directs them to degradation [191]. Therefore, by playing a dual role in both signal stimulation and attenuation, FRS2 is an important factor in assisting the FGF receptor in the regulation of the developmental processes. In agreement with this, FRS2 is ubiquitously expressed, with the highest expression level in brain, lung, kidney, ovary and testis and can be detected at virtually every developmental stage of a mouse [192]. In line with its important function during development, FRS2 knockout mice display embryonic lethality due to severe problems in gastrulation [180,193].

2.6. MAP Kinase Organizer 1

Whereas FRS2 plays a role in the most upstream part of the MAPK pathway by recruiting signaling components to the RTKs, MORG1 is a scaffold protein in the downstream part of the ERK cascade [194]. Interestingly, MORG1 was first isolated as a binding partner of MP1 [194], which is a very small scaffold protein without the capacity to independently facilitate the assembly of all the kinases in the ERK pathway [85]. Although MORG1 is composed of only 315 amino acids and exhibits a molecular mass of approximately 35 kDa, it is composed of as many as seven WD-40 domains, which form beta-propeller structures and serve as docking sites for many MAPK signal transducers. In this respect, MORG1 associates with ERK1/2, MEK1/2, C-Raf and B-Raf and accelerates downstream signaling from G protein-associated receptors in response to lysophosphatidic acid. Furthermore, it facilitates ERK1/2 activation when cells are stimulated with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) or serum. However, MORG1 is dispensable for the downstream signaling of major tyrosine kinase receptors, such as the epidermal growth factor (EGF) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) receptors [194].

MORG1 was also shown to be important for the regulation of the stability of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) [195]. As a part of a transcriptional complex, HIF-1 activates the transcription of genes involved in the cellular adaptation to low oxygen availability. HIF-1 is composed of two subunits, the oxygen sensitive alpha- and beta-subunits. Under normal oxygen levels, the alpha subunit is hydroxylated by a family of prolyl hydroxylases (PHD). This creates a signal for ubiquitin ligases to exert ubiquitination that will finally target the protein for proteasomal degradation. MORG1 was found to bind to PHD3, and this interaction was shown to activate or stabilize PHD3. In this way, MORG1 assists PHD3 in the regulation of the protein levels of HIF-1α [195].

MORG1 is ubiquitously expressed, with the highest expression levels in heart, brain, liver, kidney and testis, while lower amounts were detected in lung, spleen and skeletal muscle [194]. MORG1 knockout mice display an embryonically lethal phenotype, due to severe neuronal developmental defects, whereas heterozygous MORG1+/− mice are normal [196198]. However, when compared to the wild-type littermates, heterozygous MORG1+/− mice are partially protected from renal and cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury [197,198]. Furthermore, expression of MORG1 was found to be reduced in human brain tissue with ischemic damage, while astrocytes in the surrounding brain tissue showed a strong MORG1 expression [196]. Decreased MORG1 expression might be an intrinsic mechanism of the injured tissue to activate the genetic program, which would enable brain recovery with the help of the increased HIF-1alpha expression and adaptation to hypoxia. These observations put MORG1 into the class of putative therapeutic targets with the aim to limit renal or cerebral injury after ischemia-reperfusion.

2.7. Flotillin-1, a Novel MAPK Scaffolding Protein

Membrane microdomains, also known as lipid rafts, participate in cellular signaling events by providing a specialized surrounding where membrane receptors, their respective signaling partners and adaptor proteins meet to initiate downstream signaling. Due to their enrichment in sphingolipids and cholesterol, these microdomains exhibit a so-called liquid ordered state in the membranes and are able to float in low density fractions of detergent resistant membrane (DRM) preparations [199,200]. Proteins of the flotillin family (flotillin-1 and −2) constitutively associate with membrane microdomains [201,202] and are therefore frequently used as marker proteins for those microdomains. For our recent review on flotillin function, please see [203].

Structurally, flotillins are organized in two major domains. The N-terminal globular SPFH (stomatin/prohibitin/flotillin/HflK/C), also called PHB (prohibitin homology), domain contains acylated residues and hydrophobic stretches that, together with the C-terminal flotillin-domain, enable flotillins to firmly associate with membrane microdomains. In addition, the predicted coiled-coil structures in the C-terminus of flotillins are essential for proper homo- and hetero-oligomerization [204210]. Subcellularly, flotillins localize to the plasma membrane, vesicular/endosomal structures and to the nucleus [209215]. However, the subcellular localization of flotillins is rather dynamic and depends on the cell type and external stimuli.

Interestingly, flotillins are downstream transcriptional targets of ERK signaling. Their transcription is regulated not only by ERK, but also by the retinoic X receptor complexes, which is detectable as an enhanced activity of the flotillin promoter [216]. On the other hand, flotillins, especially flotillin-1, are important regulators of ERK signaling (see below). It is noteworthy that, upon transient depletion of flotillin-1 in HeLa cells, the expression of cyclin D1 upon growth factor treatment is impaired [217,218]. This correlates well with the observation of Lin et al., showing that a knockdown of flotillin-1 in breast cancer cells yields a reduced expression of cyclin D1 and results in an arrest of the cell cycle in the G1/S phase [218].

Flotillins have been functionally implicated to participate in several cellular processes, such as clathrin-independent endocytosis [212,219], organization of the actin cytoskeleton [208,209,220], cellular adhesion [209] and various signaling processes [209,217,221224]. Stimulation of cells with growth factors, such as EGF, results in Src family kinase-mediated phosphorylation of flotillins and their translocation from the plasma membrane to late endosomes [204,225]. This process is dependent on the proper hetero-oligomerization of flotillins and the phosphorylation of Tyr163 in flotillin-2 and Tyr160 in flotillin-1, and a point mutation of Tyr163 into Phe results in constitutive localization of flotillin-2 to the plasma membrane [204,209].

Recently, our group and others found implications of flotillins in MAPK signaling pathways, for example, in EGF receptor [217], insulin receptor [226], TrkA receptor [223] or IgE receptor signaling [222]. Sugawara and colleagues investigated the GPCR-mediated p38/MAPK signaling pathway and showed that flotillins are Gαq binding proteins that positively modulate Gq signaling [224]. Furthermore, in the context of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-mediated MAPK downstream signaling, flotillin-1 interacts with both members of the FRS family of scaffold proteins (FRS2 and FRS3) [227]. Upon growth factor treatment of cells, FRS2 is phosphorylated and serves as an adapter protein, which recruits several signaling proteins that induce Ras-mediated MAPK signaling. In addition, it has been suggested that ERK1/2 acts as a negative feedback regulator on FRS2 [193,228,229]. Upon flotillin-1 depletion, tyrosine phosphorylation of FRS2 is increased, implicating that the flotillin-1/FRS2 signaling complex is required for proper growth factor signaling [227].

Recently, we described a dual role for flotillin-1 during EGFR activation and MAPK downstream signaling [217]. Early, after growth factor stimulation, transient loss of flotillin-1 results in a diminished activation of the receptor tyrosine kinases, as well as impaired ligand-induced receptor clustering prior to its internalization, which indicates an important role for flotillin-1 during receptor tyrosine kinase activation. Later on, flotillin-1 binds the core components of the MAPK cascade C-Raf, MEK1 and ERK2 simultaneously and independently of KSR1 (Figure 3). However, it is still unclear how exactly flotillin-1 associates with the said MAPK components and whether this association changes upon growth factor treatment. Nevertheless, the ability of flotillin-1 to bind the three tiers of the MAPK pathway simultaneously, modulate ERK activation and regulate transcriptional regulation downstream of ERK defines flotillin-1 as a MAPK scaffolding protein [216,217].

3. MAP Kinase Scaffolders: What Are They Good for?

Originally, a simplified view of signaling pathways with a linear flow and amplification was presented, which can still be found in many text books, etc. However, recent research efforts have revealed that rather than utilizing linear cascades, signaling proceeds through intertwining communication networks. The plethora of scaffolding proteins that have been identified in recent years are required for many aspects of signaling. Scaffolders not only increase the efficiency and specificity of signaling, but they also facilitate the crosstalk between different signaling pathways. For example, the MP1/p14 complex plays an important role in the crosstalk between Rac/p21-activated kinase 1 (PAK1) and ERK signaling pathways. It regulates the PAK1-dependent activation of MEK1 in response to adhesion, thus representing a point of convergence for integrating growth factor signaling and cell adhesion to extracellular matrix (ECM) [230,231]. Importantly, the kinetics (amplitude, duration, etc.) of a signaling response is extremely important in regulating the final cellular outcome of the signaling, as, e.g., MAPK activation can result in either proliferation or differentiation of the target cells.

But why do we need so many different scaffolding proteins for a single signaling pathway, such as the MAPK cascade? These scaffolds are usually part of and actually even vital for the formation of multiprotein signaling complexes, and they frequently even bind to the same cascade components. How can a specific function still be accomplished? Upon a closer look, the different scaffolds show many features that distinguish them from the others. Some scaffolds show a very specific cellular localization and may thus regulate or restrict the signaling in specific subcompartments, as, for example, the MP1/p14 scaffold in endosomes, Sef1 in the Golgi or GIT1 (G protein coupled receptor kinase interacting 1), RACK1 (receptor for activated protein C kinase 1) and paxillin in focal adhesions [232]. Furthermore, some scaffolds are constitutive, whereas others are stimulus-dependent. Even within one scaffold, different components may bind either constitutively or only after an extracellular stimulus. It may even be that some scaffolds only respond to specific stimuli, but not to others, as has been shown for MORG1 [194]. The scaffolds also differ in the number of signaling proteins they are able to bind. For example, the MP1/p14 scaffold is a two-component scaffolder that binds MEK1 and ERK1, whereas KSR1 and flotillin-1 can bind at least three signaling tiers. In the case of MP1, its specificity towards MEK1/ERK1 may facilitate specific cellular responses by means of activation of ERK1, but not ERK2 in endosomes.

Some scaffolders, such as MORG1 and flotillin-1, appear even to be “superscaffolds” that are not only capable of binding to the MAPK components, but also to other scaffolds. For example, MORG1 binds to Raf, MEK and ERK, but also associates with the MP1 scaffold in the endosomes [194], whereas RACK1 can bind Raf, MEK and ERK, but it also associates with MP1 [232]. Similarly, flotillin-1 directly associates with Raf, MEK and ERK, but it is also found in a complex with KSR1 [217]. Intriguingly, flotillin-1 also interacts with both FRS2 that has been implicated as a MAPK scaffold and with MORG1 (our unpublished data). However, it has not been studied so far if flotillin-1 is also capable of interacting with MP1, but its interaction with MORG1 may point to at least a functional, if not direct, interaction. Due to the fact that the localization of flotillin-1 changes during signaling in that it becomes endocytosed from the plasma membrane into endosomes upon growth factor stimulation, flotillin-1 may be capable of functioning as a mediator between different scaffolds that show a more specific and signal-independent localization in a certain cellular compartment. The molecular details of this potential flotillin-1 function still need to be clarified in detail, but it is plausible that flotillin-1 acts as a master scaffolder that plays an important role in the regulation of other MAPK scaffolds.

Acknowledgments

The work in the Tikkanen lab has been financially supported by a personal grant (Ti291/6-2) of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) to RT. We thank the members of the Tikkanen group for comments and discussions.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Manning, G.; Whyte, D.B.; Martinez, R.; Hunter, T.; Sudarsanam, S. The protein kinase complement of the human genome. Science 2002, 298, 1912–1934. [Google Scholar]
  2. Alonso, A.; Sasin, J.; Bottini, N.; Friedberg, I.; Friedberg, I.; Osterman, A.; Godzik, A.; Hunter, T.; Dixon, J.; Mustelin, T. Protein tyrosine phosphatases in the human genome. Cell 2004, 117, 699–711. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhou, M.; Felder, S.; Rubinstein, M.; Hurwitz, D.R.; Ullrich, A.; Lax, I.; Schlessinger, J. Real-time measurements of kinetics of EGF binding to soluble EGF receptor monomers and dimers support the dimerization model for receptor activation. Biochemistry 1993, 32, 8193–8198. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lemmon, M.A.; Schlessinger, J. Cell signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases. Cell 2010, 141, 1117–1134. [Google Scholar]
  5. Yarden, Y.; Schlessinger, J. Self-phosphorylation of epidermal growth factor receptor: Evidence for a model of intermolecular allosteric activation. Biochemistry 1987, 26, 1434–1442. [Google Scholar]
  6. Buday, L.; Downward, J. Epidermal growth factor regulates p21ras through the formation of a complex of receptor, Grb2 adapter protein, and Sos nucleotide exchange factor. Cell 1993, 73, 611–620. [Google Scholar]
  7. Egan, S.E.; Giddings, B.W.; Brooks, M.W.; Buday, L.; Sizeland, A.M.; Weinberg, R.A. Association of Sos Ras exchange protein with Grb2 is implicated in tyrosine kinase signal transduction and transformation. Nature 1993, 363, 45–51. [Google Scholar]
  8. Li, N.; Batzer, A.; Daly, R.; Yajnik, V.; Skolnik, E.; Chardin, P.; Bar-Sagi, D.; Margolis, B.; Schlessinger, J. Guanine-nucleotide-releasing factor hSos1 binds to Grb2 and links receptor tyrosine kinases to Ras signalling. Nature 1993, 363, 85–88. [Google Scholar]
  9. Lowenstein, E.J.; Daly, R.J.; Batzer, A.G.; Li, W.; Margolis, B.; Lammers, R.; Ullrich, A.; Skolnik, E.Y.; Bar-Sagi, D.; Schlessinger, J. The SH2 and SH3 domain-containing protein GRB2 links receptor tyrosine kinases to ras signaling. Cell 1992, 70, 431–442. [Google Scholar]
  10. Batzer, A.G.; Rotin, D.; Urena, J.M.; Skolnik, E.Y.; Schlessinger, J. Hierarchy of binding sites for Grb2 and Shc on the epidermal growth factor receptor. Mol. Cell. Biol 1994, 14, 5192–5201. [Google Scholar]
  11. Rozakis-Adcock, M.; Fernley, R.; Wade, J.; Pawson, T.; Bowtell, D. The SH2 and SH3 domains of mammalian Grb2 couple the EGF receptor to the Ras activator mSos1. Nature 1993, 363, 83–85. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chardin, P.; Camonis, J.H.; Gale, N.W.; van Aelst, L.; Schlessinger, J.; Wigler, M.H.; Bar-Sagi, D. Human Sos1: A guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Ras that binds to GRB2. Science 1993, 260, 1338–1343. [Google Scholar]
  13. Medema, R.H.; de Vries-Smits, A.M.; van der Zon, G.C.; Maassen, J.A.; Bos, J.L. Ras activation by insulin and epidermal growth factor through enhanced exchange of guanine nucleotides on p21ras. Mol. Cell. Biol 1993, 13, 155–162. [Google Scholar]
  14. Satoh, T.; Endo, M.; Nakafuku, M.; Akiyama, T.; Yamamoto, T.; Kaziro, Y. Accumulation of p21ras. GTP in response to stimulation with epidermal growth factor and oncogene products with tyrosine kinase activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1990, 87, 7926–7929. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wood, K.W.; Sarnecki, C.; Roberts, T.M.; Blenis, J. Ras mediates nerve growth factor receptor modulation of three signal-transducing protein kinases: MAP kinase, Raf-1, and RSK. Cell 1992, 68, 1041–1050. [Google Scholar]
  16. Van Aelst, L.; Barr, M.; Marcus, S.; Polverino, A.; Wigler, M. Complex formation between Ras and Raf and other protein kinases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993, 90, 6213–6217. [Google Scholar]
  17. Vojtek, A.B.; Hollenberg, S.M.; Cooper, J.A. Mammalian Ras interacts directly with the serine/threonine kinase Raf. Cell 1993, 74, 205–214. [Google Scholar]
  18. Warne, P.H.; Viciana, P.R.; Downward, J. Direct interaction of Ras and the amino-terminal region of Raf-1 in vitro. Nature 1993, 364, 352–355. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhang, X.F.; Settleman, J.; Kyriakis, J.M.; Takeuchi-Suzuki, E.; Elledge, S.J.; Marshall, M.S.; Bruder, J.T.; Rapp, U.R.; Avruch, J. Normal and oncogenic p21ras proteins bind to the amino-terminal regulatory domain of c-Raf-1. Nature 1993, 364, 308–313. [Google Scholar]
  20. Moodie, S.A.; Willumsen, B.M.; Weber, M.J.; Wolfman, A. Complexes of Ras. GTP with Raf-1 and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase. Science 1993, 260, 1658–1661. [Google Scholar]
  21. Leevers, S.J.; Paterson, H.F.; Marshall, C.J. Requirement for Ras in Raf activation is overcome by targeting Raf to the plasma membrane. Nature 1994, 369, 411–414. [Google Scholar]
  22. Marais, R.; Light, Y.; Paterson, H.F.; Marshall, C.J. Ras recruits Raf-1 to the plasma membrane for activation by tyrosine phosphorylation. EMBO J 1995, 14, 3136–3145. [Google Scholar]
  23. Stokoe, D.; Macdonald, S.G.; Cadwallader, K.; Symons, M.; Hancock, J.F. Activation of Raf as a result of recruitment to the plasma membrane. Science 1994, 264, 1463–1467. [Google Scholar]
  24. Clark, G.J.; Drugan, J.K.; Rossman, K.L.; Carpenter, J.W.; Rogers-Graham, K.; Fu, H.; Der, C.J.; Campbell, S.L. 14-3-3 zeta negatively regulates raf-1 activity by interactions with the Raf-1 cysteine-rich domain. J. Biol. Chem 1997, 272, 20990–20993. [Google Scholar]
  25. Roy, S.; McPherson, R.A.; Apolloni, A.; Yan, J.; Lane, A.; Clyde-Smith, J.; Hancock, J.F. 14-3-3 facilitates Ras-dependent Raf-1 activation in vitro and in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol 1998, 18, 3947–3955. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ueda, Y.; Hirai, S.; Osada, S.; Suzuki, A.; Mizuno, K.; Ohno, S. Protein kinase C activates the MEK-ERK pathway in a manner independent of Ras and dependent on Raf. J. Biol. Chem 1996, 271, 23512–23519. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zou, Y.; Komuro, I.; Yamazaki, T.; Aikawa, R.; Kudoh, S.; Shiojima, I.; Hiroi, Y.; Mizuno, T.; Yazaki, Y. Protein kinase C, but not tyrosine kinases or Ras, plays a critical role in angiotensin II-induced activation of Raf-1 kinase and extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases in cardiac myocytes. J. Biol. Chem 1996, 271, 33592–33597. [Google Scholar]
  28. Schaap, D.; van der Wal, J.; Howe, L.R.; Marshall, C.J.; van Blitterswijk, W.J. A dominant-negative mutant of raf blocks mitogen-activated protein kinase activation by growth factors and oncogenic p21ras. J. Biol. Chem 1993, 268, 20232–20236. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ahn, N.G.; Krebs, E.G. Evidence for an epidermal growth factor-stimulated protein kinase cascade in Swiss 3T3 cells. Activation of serine peptide kinase activity by myelin basic protein kinases in vitro. J. Biol. Chem 1990, 265, 11495–11501. [Google Scholar]
  30. Alessi, D.R.; Saito, Y.; Campbell, D.G.; Cohen, P.; Sithanandam, G.; Rapp, U.; Ashworth, A.; Marshall, C.J.; Cowley, S. Identification of the sites in MAP kinase kinase-1 phosphorylated by p74raf-1. EMBO J 1994, 13, 1610–1619. [Google Scholar]
  31. Gomez, N.; Cohen, P. Dissection of the protein kinase cascade by which nerve growth factor activates MAP kinases. Nature 1991, 353, 170–173. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kyriakis, J.M.; App, H.; Zhang, X.F.; Banerjee, P.; Brautigan, D.L.; Rapp, U.R.; Avruch, J. Raf-1 activates MAP kinase-kinase. Nature 1992, 358, 417–421. [Google Scholar]
  33. Dhanasekaran, N.; Premkumar Reddy, E. Signaling by dual specificity kinases. Oncogene 1998, 17, 1447–1455. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ahn, N.G.; Seger, R.; Bratlien, R.L.; Diltz, C.D.; Tonks, N.K.; Krebs, E.G. Multiple components in an epidermal growth factor-stimulated protein kinase cascade. In vitro activation of a myelin basic protein/microtubule-associated protein 2 kinase. J. Biol. Chem 1991, 266, 4220–4227. [Google Scholar]
  35. Crews, C.M.; Alessandrini, A.; Erikson, R.L. The primary structure of MEK, a protein kinase that phosphorylates the ERK gene product. Science 1992, 258, 478–480. [Google Scholar]
  36. Payne, D.M.; Rossomando, A.J.; Martino, P.; Erickson, A.K.; Her, J.H.; Shabanowitz, J.; Hunt, D.F.; Weber, M.J.; Sturgill, T.W. Identification of the regulatory phosphorylation sites in pp42/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAP kinase). EMBO J 1991, 10, 885–892. [Google Scholar]
  37. Canagarajah, B.J.; Khokhlatchev, A.; Cobb, M.H.; Goldsmith, E.J. Activation mechanism of the MAP kinase ERK2 by dual phosphorylation. Cell 1997, 90, 859–869. [Google Scholar]
  38. Chen, R.H.; Sarnecki, C.; Blenis, J. Nuclear localization and regulation of erk- and rsk-encoded protein kinases. Mol. Cell. Biol 1992, 12, 915–927. [Google Scholar]
  39. Khokhlatchev, A.V.; Canagarajah, B.; Wilsbacher, J.; Robinson, M.; Atkinson, M.; Goldsmith, E.; Cobb, M.H. Phosphorylation of the MAP kinase ERK2 promotes its homodimerization and nuclear translocation. Cell 1998, 93, 605–615. [Google Scholar]
  40. Kriegsheim, A.; Preisinger, C.; Kolch, W. Mapping of signaling pathways by functional interaction proteomics. Methods Mol. Biol 2008, 484, 177–192. [Google Scholar]
  41. Yoon, S.; Seger, R. The extracellular signal-regulated kinase: Multiple substrates regulate diverse cellular functions. Growth Factors 2006, 24, 21–44. [Google Scholar]
  42. Rossomando, A.J.; Payne, D.M.; Weber, M.J.; Sturgill, T.W. Evidence that pp42, a major tyrosine kinase target protein, is a mitogen-activated serine/threonine protein kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1989, 86, 6940–6943. [Google Scholar]
  43. Alvarez, E.; Northwood, I.C.; Gonzalez, F.A.; Latour, D.A.; Seth, A.; Abate, C.; Curran, T.; Davis, R.J. Pro-Leu-Ser/Thr-Pro is a consensus primary sequence for substrate protein phosphorylation. Characterization of the phosphorylation of c-myc and c-jun proteins by an epidermal growth factor receptor threonine 669 protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem 1991, 266, 15277–15285. [Google Scholar]
  44. Gonzalez, F.A.; Raden, D.L.; Davis, R.J. Identification of substrate recognition determinants for human ERK1 and ERK2 protein kinases. J. Biol. Chem 1991, 266, 22159–22163. [Google Scholar]
  45. Aebersold, D.M.; Shaul, Y.D.; Yung, Y.; Yarom, N.; Yao, Z.; Hanoch, T.; Seger, R. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1c (ERK1c), a novel 42-kilodalton ERK, demonstrates unique modes of regulation, localization, and function. Mol. Cell. Biol 2004, 24, 10000–10015. [Google Scholar]
  46. Yung, Y.; Yao, Z.; Hanoch, T.; Seger, R. ERK1b, a 46-kDa ERK isoform that is differentially regulated by MEK. J. Biol. Chem 2000, 275, 15799–15808. [Google Scholar]
  47. Fischer, A.M.; Katayama, C.D.; Pages, G.; Pouyssegur, J.; Hedrick, S.M. The role of erk1 and erk2 in multiple stages of T cell development. Immunity 2005, 23, 431–443. [Google Scholar]
  48. Lefloch, R.; Pouyssegur, J.; Lenormand, P. Single and combined silencing of ERK1 and ERK2 reveals their positive contribution to growth signaling depending on their expression levels. Mol. Cell. Biol 2008, 28, 511–527. [Google Scholar]
  49. Nekrasova, T.; Shive, C.; Gao, Y.; Kawamura, K.; Guardia, R.; Landreth, G.; Forsthuber, T.G. ERK1-deficient mice show normal T cell effector function and are highly susceptible to experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Immunol 2005, 175, 2374–2380. [Google Scholar]
  50. Saba-El-Leil, M.K.; Vella, F.D.; Vernay, B.; Voisin, L.; Chen, L.; Labrecque, N.; Ang, S.L.; Meloche, S. An essential function of the mitogen-activated protein kinase Erk2 in mouse trophoblast development. EMBO Rep 2003, 4, 964–968. [Google Scholar]
  51. Vantaggiato, C.; Formentini, I.; Bondanza, A.; Bonini, C.; Naldini, L.; Brambilla, R. ERK1 and ERK2 mitogen-activated protein kinases affect Ras-dependent cell signaling differentially. J. Biol 2006, 5, 14. [Google Scholar]
  52. Voisin, L.; Saba-El-Leil, M.K.; Julien, C.; Fremin, C.; Meloche, S. Genetic demonstration of a redundant role of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 (ERK1) and ERK2 mitogen-activated protein kinases in promoting fibroblast proliferation. Mol. Cell. Biol 2010, 30, 2918–2932. [Google Scholar]
  53. Von Thun, A.; Birtwistle, M.; Kalna, G.; Grindlay, J.; Strachan, D.; Kolch, W.; von Kriegsheim, A.; Norman, J.C. ERK2 drives tumour cell migration in three-dimensional microenvironments by suppressing expression of Rab17 and liprin-beta2. J. Cell Sci 2012, 125, 1465–1477. [Google Scholar]
  54. Pages, G.; Guerin, S.; Grall, D.; Bonino, F.; Smith, A.; Anjuere, F.; Auberger, P.; Pouyssegur, J. Defective thymocyte maturation in p44 MAP kinase (Erk 1) knockout mice. Science 1999, 286, 1374–1377. [Google Scholar]
  55. Yao, Y.; Li, W.; Wu, J.; Germann, U.A.; Su, M.S.; Kuida, K.; Boucher, D.M. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2 is necessary for mesoderm differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 12759–12764. [Google Scholar]
  56. Brunet, A.; Roux, D.; Lenormand, P.; Dowd, S.; Keyse, S.; Pouyssegur, J. Nuclear translocation of p42/p44 mitogen-activated protein kinase is required for growth factor-induced gene expression and cell cycle entry. EMBO J 1999, 18, 664–674. [Google Scholar]
  57. Casar, B.; Pinto, A.; Crespo, P. Essential role of ERK dimers in the activation of cytoplasmic but not nuclear substrates by ERK-scaffold complexes. Mol. Cell 2008, 31, 708–721. [Google Scholar]
  58. Wolf, I.; Rubinfeld, H.; Yoon, S.; Marmor, G.; Hanoch, T.; Seger, R. Involvement of the activation loop of ERK in the detachment from cytosolic anchoring. J. Biol. Chem 2001, 276, 24490–24497. [Google Scholar]
  59. Adachi, M.; Fukuda, M.; Nishida, E. Two co-existing mechanisms for nuclear import of MAP kinase: Passive diffusion of a monomer and active transport of a dimer. EMBO J 1999, 18, 5347–5358. [Google Scholar]
  60. Chuderland, D.; Konson, A.; Seger, R. Identification and characterization of a general nuclear translocation signal in signaling proteins. Mol. Cell 2008, 31, 850–861. [Google Scholar]
  61. Kosako, H.; Yamaguchi, N.; Aranami, C.; Ushiyama, M.; Kose, S.; Imamoto, N.; Taniguchi, H.; Nishida, E.; Hattori, S. Phosphoproteomics reveals new ERK MAP kinase targets and links ERK to nucleoporin-mediated nuclear transport. Nat. Structr. Mol. Biol 2009, 16, 1026–1035. [Google Scholar]
  62. Lorenzen, J.A.; Baker, S.E.; Denhez, F.; Melnick, M.B.; Brower, D.L.; Perkins, L.A. Nuclear import of activated D-ERK by DIM-7, an importin family member encoded by the gene moleskin. Development 2001, 128, 1403–1414. [Google Scholar]
  63. Plotnikov, A.; Chuderland, D.; Karamansha, Y.; Livnah, O.; Seger, R. Nuclear extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 and 2 translocation is mediated by casein kinase 2 and accelerated by autophosphorylation. Mol. Cell. Biol 2011, 31, 3515–3530. [Google Scholar]
  64. Eblen, S.T.; Kumar, N.V.; Shah, K.; Henderson, M.J.; Watts, C.K.; Shokat, K.M.; Weber, M.J. Identification of novel ERK2 substrates through use of an engineered kinase and ATP analogs. J. Biol. Chem 2003, 278, 14926–14935. [Google Scholar]
  65. Vomastek, T.; Iwanicki, M.P.; Burack, W.R.; Tiwari, D.; Kumar, D.; Parsons, J.T.; Weber, M.J.; Nandicoori, V.K. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2 (ERK2) phosphorylation sites and docking domain on the nuclear pore complex protein Tpr cooperatively regulate ERK2-Tpr interaction. Mol. Cell. Biol 2008, 28, 6954–6966. [Google Scholar]
  66. Cruzalegui, F.H.; Cano, E.; Treisman, R. ERK activation induces phosphorylation of Elk-1 at multiple S/T-P motifs to high stoichiometry. Oncogene 1999, 18, 7948–7957. [Google Scholar]
  67. Gille, H.; Sharrocks, A.D.; Shaw, P.E. Phosphorylation of transcription factor p62TCF by MAP kinase stimulates ternary complex formation at c-fos promoter. Nature 1992, 358, 414–417. [Google Scholar]
  68. Marais, R.; Wynne, J.; Treisman, R. The SRF accessory protein Elk-1 contains a growth factor-regulated transcriptional activation domain. Cell 1993, 73, 381–393. [Google Scholar]
  69. Rao, V.N.; Reddy, E.S. Elk-1 proteins interact with MAP kinases. Oncogene 1994, 9, 1855–1860. [Google Scholar]
  70. Chen, R.H.; Abate, C.; Blenis, J. Phosphorylation of the c-Fos transrepression domain by mitogen-activated protein kinase and 90-kDa ribosomal S6 kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993, 90, 10952–10956. [Google Scholar]
  71. Chen, R.H.; Juo, P.C.; Curran, T.; Blenis, J. Phosphorylation of c-Fos at the C-terminus enhances its transforming activity. Oncogene 1996, 12, 1493–1502. [Google Scholar]
  72. Ekerot, M.; Stavridis, M.P.; Delavaine, L.; Mitchell, M.P.; Staples, C.; Owens, D.M.; Keenan, I.D.; Dickinson, R.J.; Storey, K.G.; Keyse, S.M. Negative-feedback regulation of FGF signalling by DUSP6/MKP-3 is driven by ERK1/2 and mediated by Ets factor binding to a conserved site within the DUSP6/MKP-3 gene promoter. Biochem. J 2008, 412, 287–298. [Google Scholar]
  73. Muda, M.; Boschert, U.; Dickinson, R.; Martinou, J.C.; Martinou, I.; Camps, M.; Schlegel, W.; Arkinstall, S. MKP-3, a novel cytosolic protein-tyrosine phosphatase that exemplifies a new class of mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase. J. Biol. Chem 1996, 271, 4319–4326. [Google Scholar]
  74. Zhang, Z.; Kobayashi, S.; Borczuk, A.C.; Leidner, R.S.; Laframboise, T.; Levine, A.D.; Halmos, B. Dual specificity phosphatase 6 (DUSP6) is an ETS-regulated negative feedback mediator of oncogenic ERK signaling in lung cancer cells. Carcinogenesis 2010, 31, 577–586. [Google Scholar]
  75. Sgouras, D.N.; Athanasiou, M.A.; Beal, G.J., Jr; Fisher, R.J.; Blair, D.G.; Mavrothalassitis, G.J. ERF: An ETS domain protein with strong transcriptional repressor activity, can suppress ets-associated tumorigenesis and is regulated by phosphorylation during cell cycle and mitogenic stimulation. EMBO J. 1995, 14, 4781–4793. [Google Scholar]
  76. Kato, S.; Endoh, H.; Masuhiro, Y.; Kitamoto, T.; Uchiyama, S.; Sasaki, H.; Masushige, S.; Gotoh, Y.; Nishida, E.; Kawashima, H.; et al. Activation of the estrogen receptor through phosphorylation by mitogen-activated protein kinase. Science 1995, 270, 1491–1494. [Google Scholar]
  77. Madak-Erdogan, Z.; Lupien, M.; Stossi, F.; Brown, M.; Katzenellenbogen, B.S. Genomic collaboration of estrogen receptor alpha and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2 in regulating gene and proliferation programs. Mol. Cell. Biol 2011, 31, 226–236. [Google Scholar]
  78. Hu, E.; Kim, J.B.; Sarraf, P.; Spiegelman, B.M. Inhibition of adipogenesis through MAP kinase-mediated phosphorylation of PPARgamma. Science 1996, 274, 2100–2103. [Google Scholar]
  79. Cohen-Armon, M.; Visochek, L.; Rozensal, D.; Kalal, A.; Geistrikh, I.; Klein, R.; Bendetz-Nezer, S.; Yao, Z.; Seger, R. DNA-independent PARP-1 activation by phosphorylated ERK2 increases Elk1 activity: A link to histone acetylation. Mol. Cell 2007, 25, 297–308. [Google Scholar]
  80. Drobic, B.; Perez-Cadahia, B.; Yu, J.; Kung, S.K.; Davie, J.R. Promoter chromatin remodeling of immediate-early genes is mediated through H3 phosphorylation at either serine 28 or 10 by the MSK1 multi-protein complex. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38, 3196–3208. [Google Scholar]
  81. Soloaga, A.; Thomson, S.; Wiggin, G.R.; Rampersaud, N.; Dyson, M.H.; Hazzalin, C.A.; Mahadevan, L.C.; Arthur, J.S. MSK2 and MSK1 mediate the mitogen- and stress-induced phosphorylation of histone H3 and HMG-14. EMBO J 2003, 22, 2788–2797. [Google Scholar]
  82. Vicent, G.P.; Ballare, C.; Nacht, A.S.; Clausell, J.; Subtil-Rodriguez, A.; Quiles, I.; Jordan, A.; Beato, M. Induction of progesterone target genes requires activation of Erk and Msk kinases and phosphorylation of histone H3. Mol. Cell 2006, 24, 367–381. [Google Scholar]
  83. Cohen-Armon, M. PARP-1 activation in the ERK signaling pathway. Trends Pharm. Sci 2007, 28, 556–560. [Google Scholar]
  84. Nada, S.; Hondo, A.; Kasai, A.; Koike, M.; Saito, K.; Uchiyama, Y.; Okada, M. The novel lipid raft adaptor p18 controls endosome dynamics by anchoring the MEK-ERK pathway to late endosomes. EMBO J 2009, 28, 477–489. [Google Scholar]
  85. Schaeffer, H.J.; Catling, A.D.; Eblen, S.T.; Collier, L.S.; Krauss, A.; Weber, M.J. MP1: A MEK binding partner that enhances enzymatic activation of the MAP kinase cascade. Science 1998, 281, 1668–1671. [Google Scholar]
  86. Wunderlich, W.; Fialka, I.; Teis, D.; Alpi, A.; Pfeifer, A.; Parton, R.G.; Lottspeich, F.; Huber, L.A. A novel 14-kilodalton protein interacts with the mitogen-activated protein kinase scaffold mp1 on a late endosomal/lysosomal compartment. J. Cell Biol 2001, 152, 765–776. [Google Scholar]
  87. Alonso, M.; Melani, M.; Converso, D.; Jaitovich, A.; Paz, C.; Carreras, M.C.; Medina, J.H.; Poderoso, J.J. Mitochondrial extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 (ERK1/2) are modulated during brain development. J. Neurochem 2004, 89, 248–256. [Google Scholar]
  88. Galli, S.; Jahn, O.; Hitt, R.; Hesse, D.; Opitz, L.; Plessmann, U.; Urlaub, H.; Poderoso, J.J.; Jares-Erijman, E.A.; Jovin, T.M. A new paradigm for MAPK: Structural interactions of hERK1 with mitochondria in HeLa cells. PLoS One 2009, 4, e7541. [Google Scholar]
  89. Mebratu, Y.; Tesfaigzi, Y. How ERK1/2 activation controls cell proliferation and cell death: Is subcellular localization the answer? Cell Cycle 2009, 8, 1168–1175. [Google Scholar]
  90. Asano, E.; Maeda, M.; Hasegawa, H.; Ito, S.; Hyodo, T.; Yuan, H.; Takahashi, M.; Hamaguchi, M.; Senga, T. Role of palladin phosphorylation by extracellular signal-regulated kinase in cell migration. PLoS One 2011, 6, e29338. [Google Scholar]
  91. Liu, Z.X.; Yu, C.F.; Nickel, C.; Thomas, S.; Cantley, L.G. Hepatocyte growth factor induces ERK-dependent paxillin phosphorylation and regulates paxillin-focal adhesion kinase association. J. Biol. Chem 2002, 277, 10452–10458. [Google Scholar]
  92. Romeo, Y.; Zhang, X.; Roux, P.P. Regulation and function of the RSK family of protein kinases. Biochem. J 2012, 441, 553–569. [Google Scholar]
  93. Sturgill, T.W.; Ray, L.B.; Erikson, E.; Maller, J.L. Insulin-stimulated MAP-2 kinase phosphorylates and activates ribosomal protein S6 kinase II. Nature 1988, 334, 715–718. [Google Scholar]
  94. Brunet, A.; Pages, G.; Pouyssegur, J. Growth factor-stimulated MAP kinase induces rapid retrophosphorylation and inhibition of MAP kinase kinase (MEK1). FEBS Lett 1994, 346, 299–303. [Google Scholar]
  95. Mansour, S.J.; Resing, K.A.; Candi, J.M.; Hermann, A.S.; Gloor, J.W.; Herskind, K.R.; Wartmann, M.; Davis, R.J.; Ahn, N.G. Mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase phosphorylation of MAP kinase kinase: Determination of phosphorylation sites by mass spectrometry and site-directed mutagenesis. J. Biochem 1994, 116, 304–314. [Google Scholar]
  96. Eblen, S.T.; Slack-Davis, J.K.; Tarcsafalvi, A.; Parsons, J.T.; Weber, M.J.; Catling, A.D. Mitogen-activated protein kinase feedback phosphorylation regulates MEK1 complex formation and activation during cellular adhesion. Mol. Cell. Biol 2004, 24, 2308–2317. [Google Scholar]
  97. Catalanotti, F.; Reyes, G.; Jesenberger, V.; Galabova-Kovacs, G.; de Matos Simoes, R.; Carugo, O.; Baccarini, M. A Mek1-Mek2 heterodimer determines the strength and duration of the Erk signal. Nat. Structr. Mol. Biol 2009, 16, 294–303. [Google Scholar]
  98. Corbalan-Garcia, S.; Yang, S.S.; Degenhardt, K.R.; Bar-Sagi, D. Identification of the mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylation sites on human Sos1 that regulate interaction with Grb2. Mol. Cell. Biol 1996, 16, 5674–5682. [Google Scholar]
  99. Owens, D.M.; Keyse, S.M. Differential regulation of MAP kinase signalling by dual-specificity protein phosphatases. Oncogene 2007, 26, 3203–3213. [Google Scholar]
  100. Brondello, J.M.; Brunet, A.; Pouyssegur, J.; McKenzie, F.R. The dual specificity mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase-1 and −2 are induced by the p42/p44MAPK cascade. J. Biol. Chem 1997, 272, 1368–1376. [Google Scholar]
  101. Brondello, J.M.; Pouyssegur, J.; McKenzie, F.R. Reduced MAP kinase phosphatase-1 degradation after p42/p44MAPK-dependent phosphorylation. Science 1999, 286, 2514–2517. [Google Scholar]
  102. Marchetti, S.; Gimond, C.; Chambard, J.C.; Touboul, T.; Roux, D.; Pouyssegur, J.; Pages, G. Extracellular signal-regulated kinases phosphorylate mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase 3/DUSP6 at serines 159 and 197, two sites critical for its proteasomal degradation. Mol. Cell. Biol 2005, 25, 854–864. [Google Scholar]
  103. Furthauer, M.; Lin, W.; Ang, S.L.; Thisse, B.; Thisse, C. Sef is a feedback-induced antagonist of Ras/MAPK-mediated FGF signalling. Nat. Cell. Biol 2002, 4, 170–174. [Google Scholar]
  104. Torii, S.; Kusakabe, M.; Yamamoto, T.; Maekawa, M.; Nishida, E. Sef is a spatial regulator for Ras/MAP kinase signaling. Dev. Cell 2004, 7, 33–44. [Google Scholar]
  105. Tsang, M.; Friesel, R.; Kudoh, T.; Dawid, I.B. Identification of Sef, a novel modulator of FGF signalling. Nat. Cell. Biol 2002, 4, 165–169. [Google Scholar]
  106. Heinrich, R.; Neel, B.G.; Rapoport, T.A. Mathematical models of protein kinase signal transduction. Mol. Cell 2002, 9, 957–970. [Google Scholar]
  107. Locasale, J.W.; Shaw, A.S.; Chakraborty, A.K. Scaffold proteins confer diverse regulatory properties to protein kinase cascades. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 13307–13312. [Google Scholar]
  108. Yu, W.; Fantl, W.J.; Harrowe, G.; Williams, L.T. Regulation of the MAP kinase pathway by mammalian Ksr through direct interaction with MEK and ERK. Curr. Biol 1998, 8, 56–64. [Google Scholar]
  109. Ferrell, J.E., Jr. What do scaffold proteins really do? Sci. STKE 2000, 2000, pe1. [Google Scholar]
  110. Levchenko, A.; Bruck, J.; Sternberg, P.W. Scaffold proteins may biphasically affect the levels of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling and reduce its threshold properties. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 5818–5823. [Google Scholar]
  111. Dard, N.; Peter, M. Scaffold proteins in MAP kinase signaling: More than simple passive activating platforms. Bioessays 2006, 28, 146–156. [Google Scholar]
  112. Elion, E.A. The Ste5p scaffold. J. Cell Sci 2001, 114, 3967–3978. [Google Scholar]
  113. Engstrom, W.; Ward, A.; Moorwood, K. The role of scaffold proteins in JNK signalling. Cell Prolif 2010, 43, 56–66. [Google Scholar]
  114. Saito, H. Regulation of cross-talk in yeast MAPK signaling pathways. Curr. Opin. Microbiol 2010, 13, 677–683. [Google Scholar]
  115. Dhanasekaran, D.N.; Kashef, K.; Lee, C.M.; Xu, H.; Reddy, E.P. Scaffold proteins of MAP-kinase modules. Oncogene 2007, 26, 3185–3202. [Google Scholar]
  116. Sbroggio, M.; Carnevale, D.; Bertero, A.; Cifelli, G.; De Blasio, E.; Mascio, G.; Hirsch, E.; Bahou, W.F.; Turco, E.; Silengo, L.; et al. IQGAP1 regulates ERK1/2 and AKT signalling in the heart and sustains functional remodelling upon pressure overload. Cardiovasc. Res 2011, 91, 456–464. [Google Scholar]
  117. Ren, J.G.; Li, Z.; Sacks, D.B. IQGAP1 modulates activation of B-Raf. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 10465–10469. [Google Scholar]
  118. Roy, M.; Li, Z.; Sacks, D.B. IQGAP1 binds ERK2 and modulates its activity. J. Biol. Chem 2004, 279, 17329–17337. [Google Scholar]
  119. Roy, M.; Li, Z.; Sacks, D.B. IQGAP1 is a scaffold for mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling. Mol. Cell. Biol 2005, 25, 7940–7952. [Google Scholar]
  120. Kornfeld, K.; Hom, D.B.; Horvitz, H.R. The ksr-1 gene encodes a novel protein kinase involved in Ras-mediated signaling in C. elegans. Cell 1995, 83, 903–913. [Google Scholar]
  121. Sundaram, M.; Han, M. The C. elegans ksr-1 gene encodes a novel Raf-related kinase involved in Ras-mediated signal transduction. Cell 1995, 83, 889–901. [Google Scholar]
  122. Therrien, M.; Chang, H.C.; Solomon, N.M.; Karim, F.D.; Wassarman, D.A.; Rubin, G.M. KSR, a novel protein kinase required for RAS signal transduction. Cell 1995, 83, 879–888. [Google Scholar]
  123. Therrien, M.; Michaud, N.R.; Rubin, G.M.; Morrison, D.K. KSR modulates signal propagation within the MAPK cascade. Genes Dev 1996, 10, 2684–2695. [Google Scholar]
  124. Channavajhala, P.L.; Wu, L.; Cuozzo, J.W.; Hall, J.P.; Liu, W.; Lin, L.L.; Zhang, Y. Identification of a novel human kinase supporter of Ras (hKSR-2) that functions as a negative regulator of Cot (Tpl2) signaling. J. Biol. Chem 2003, 278, 47089–47097. [Google Scholar]
  125. Ohmachi, M.; Rocheleau, C.E.; Church, D.; Lambie, E.; Schedl, T.; Sundaram, M.V. C. elegans ksr-1 and ksr-2 have both unique and redundant functions and are required for MPK-1 ERK phosphorylation. Curr. Biol 2002, 12, 427–433. [Google Scholar]
  126. Klutho, P.J.; Costanzo-Garvey, D.L.; Lewis, R.E. Regulation of glucose homeostasis by KSR1 and MARK2. PLoS One 2011, 6, e29304. [Google Scholar]
  127. Lozano, J.; Xing, R.; Cai, Z.; Jensen, H.L.; Trempus, C.; Mark, W.; Cannon, R.; Kolesnick, R. Deficiency of kinase suppressor of Ras1 prevents oncogenic ras signaling in mice. Cancer Res 2003, 63, 4232–4238. [Google Scholar]
  128. Nguyen, A.; Burack, W.R.; Stock, J.L.; Kortum, R.; Chaika, O.V.; Afkarian, M.; Muller, W.J.; Murphy, K.M.; Morrison, D.K.; Lewis, R.E.; et al. Kinase suppressor of Ras (KSR) is a scaffold which facilitates mitogen-activated protein kinase activation in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol 2002, 22, 3035–3045. [Google Scholar]
  129. Shalin, S.C.; Hernandez, C.M.; Dougherty, M.K.; Morrison, D.K.; Sweatt, J.D. Kinase suppressor of Ras1 compartmentalizes hippocampal signal transduction and subserves synaptic plasticity and memory formation. Neuron 2006, 50, 765–779. [Google Scholar]
  130. Fusello, A.M.; Mandik-Nayak, L.; Shih, F.; Lewis, R.E.; Allen, P.M.; Shaw, A.S. The MAPK scaffold kinase suppressor of Ras is involved in ERK activation by stress and proinflammatory cytokines and induction of arthritis. J. Immunol 2006, 177, 6152–6158. [Google Scholar]
  131. Kortum, R.L.; Johnson, H.J.; Costanzo, D.L.; Volle, D.J.; Razidlo, G.L.; Fusello, A.M.; Shaw, A.S.; Lewis, R.E. The molecular scaffold kinase suppressor of Ras 1 is a modifier of RasV12-induced and replicative senescence. Mol. Cell. Biol 2006, 26, 2202–2214. [Google Scholar]
  132. Morrison, D.K. KSR: A MAPK scaffold of the Ras pathway? J. Cell Sci 2001, 114, 1609–1612. [Google Scholar]
  133. Muller, J.; Ory, S.; Copeland, T.; Piwnica-Worms, H.; Morrison, D.K. C-TAK1 regulates Ras signaling by phosphorylating the MAPK scaffold, KSR1. Mol. Cell 2001, 8, 983–993. [Google Scholar]
  134. Roy, F.; Therrien, M. MAP kinase module: The Ksr connection. Curr. Biol 2002, 12, R325–R327. [Google Scholar]
  135. Michaud, N.R.; Therrien, M.; Cacace, A.; Edsall, L.C.; Spiegel, S.; Rubin, G.M.; Morrison, D.K. KSR stimulates Raf-1 activity in a kinase-independent manner. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 12792–12796. [Google Scholar]
  136. Channavajhala, P.L.; Rao, V.R.; Spaulding, V.; Lin, L.L.; Zhang, Y.G. hKSR-2 inhibits MEKK3-activated MAP kinase and NF-kappaB pathways in inflammation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 2005, 334, 1214–1218. [Google Scholar]
  137. Denouel-Galy, A.; Douville, E.M.; Warne, P.H.; Papin, C.; Laugier, D.; Calothy, G.; Downward, J.; Eychene, A. Murine Ksr interacts with MEK and inhibits Ras-induced transformation. Curr. Biol 1998, 8, 46–55. [Google Scholar]
  138. Roy, S.; Wyse, B.; Hancock, J.F. H-Ras signaling and K-Ras signaling are differentially dependent on endocytosis. Mol. Cell. Biol 2002, 22, 5128–5140. [Google Scholar]
  139. Boudeau, J.; Miranda-Saavedra, D.; Barton, G.J.; Alessi, D.R. Emerging roles of pseudokinases. Trends Cell Biol 2006, 16, 443–452. [Google Scholar]
  140. Goettel, J.A.; Liang, D.; Hilliard, V.C.; Edelblum, K.L.; Broadus, M.R.; Gould, K.L.; Hanks, S.K.; Polk, D.B. KSR1 is a functional protein kinase capable of serine autophosphorylation and direct phosphorylation of MEK1. Exp. Cell. Res 2011, 317, 452–463. [Google Scholar]
  141. Sugimoto, T.; Stewart, S.; Han, M.; Guan, K.L. The kinase suppressor of Ras (KSR) modulates growth factor and Ras signaling by uncoupling Elk-1 phosphorylation from MAP kinase activation. EMBO J 1998, 17, 1717–1727. [Google Scholar]
  142. Yan, F.; Polk, D.B. Kinase suppressor of ras is necessary for tumor necrosis factor alpha activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase/mitogen-activated protein kinase in intestinal epithelial cells. Cancer Res 2001, 61, 963–969. [Google Scholar]
  143. Robinson, M.J.; Harkins, P.C.; Zhang, J.; Baer, R.; Haycock, J.W.; Cobb, M.H.; Goldsmith, E.J. Mutation of position 52 in ERK2 creates a nonproductive binding mode for adenosine 5′-triphosphate. Biochemistry 1996, 35, 5641–5646. [Google Scholar]
  144. Hanks, S.K.; Quinn, A.M.; Hunter, T. The protein kinase family: Conserved features and deduced phylogeny of the catalytic domains. Science 1988, 241, 42–52. [Google Scholar]
  145. Brennan, D.F.; Dar, A.C.; Hertz, N.T.; Chao, W.C.; Burlingame, A.L.; Shokat, K.M.; Barford, D. A Raf-induced allosteric transition of KSR stimulates phosphorylation of MEK. Nature 2011, 472, 366–369. [Google Scholar]
  146. Hu, J.; Yu, H.; Kornev, A.P.; Zhao, J.; Filbert, E.L.; Taylor, S.S.; Shaw, A.S. Mutation that blocks ATP binding creates a pseudokinase stabilizing the scaffolding function of kinase suppressor of Ras, CRAF and BRAF. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 6067–6072. [Google Scholar]
  147. Ory, S.; Zhou, M.; Conrads, T.P.; Veenstra, T.D.; Morrison, D.K. Protein phosphatase 2A positively regulates Ras signaling by dephosphorylating KSR1 and Raf-1 on critical 14-3-3 binding sites. Curr. Biol 2003, 13, 1356–1364. [Google Scholar]
  148. Matheny, S.A.; White, M.A. Signaling threshold regulation by the Ras effector IMP. J. Biol. Chem 2009, 284, 11007–11011. [Google Scholar]
  149. Chen, C.; Lewis, R.E.; White, M.A. IMP modulates KSR1-dependent multivalent complex formation to specify ERK1/2 pathway activation and response thresholds. J. Biol. Chem 2008, 283, 12789–12796. [Google Scholar]
  150. Howe, C.L.; Valletta, J.S.; Rusnak, A.S.; Mobley, W.C. NGF signaling from clathrin-coated vesicles: Evidence that signaling endosomes serve as a platform for the Ras-MAPK pathway. Neuron 2001, 32, 801–814. [Google Scholar]
  151. Jiang, X.; Sorkin, A. Coordinated traffic of Grb2 and Ras during epidermal growth factor receptor endocytosis visualized in living cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 2002, 13, 1522–1535. [Google Scholar]
  152. Luttrell, L.M.; Roudabush, F.L.; Choy, E.W.; Miller, W.E.; Field, M.E.; Pierce, K.L.; Lefkowitz, R.J. Activation and targeting of extracellular signal-regulated kinases by beta-arrestin scaffolds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 2449–2454. [Google Scholar]
  153. Wu, C.; Lai, C.F.; Mobley, W.C. Nerve growth factor activates persistent Rap1 signaling in endosomes. J. Neurosci 2001, 21, 5406–5416. [Google Scholar]
  154. Teis, D.; Wunderlich, W.; Huber, L.A. Localization of the MP1-MAPK scaffold complex to endosomes is mediated by p14 and required for signal transduction. Dev. Cell 2002, 3, 803–814. [Google Scholar]
  155. Lunin, V.V.; Munger, C.; Wagner, J.; Ye, Z.; Cygler, M.; Sacher, M. The structure of the MAPK scaffold, MP1, bound to its partner, p14. A complex with a critical role in endosomal map kinase signaling. J. Biol. Chem 2004, 279, 23422–23430. [Google Scholar]
  156. Bohn, G.; Allroth, A.; Brandes, G.; Thiel, J.; Glocker, E.; Schaffer, A.A.; Rathinam, C.; Taub, N.; Teis, D.; Zeidler, C.; et al. A novel human primary immunodeficiency syndrome caused by deficiency of the endosomal adaptor protein p14. Nat. Med 2007, 13, 38–45. [Google Scholar]
  157. Teis, D.; Taub, N.; Kurzbauer, R.; Hilber, D.; de Araujo, M.E.; Erlacher, M.; Offterdinger, M.; Villunger, A.; Geley, S.; Bohn, G.; et al. p14-MP1-MEK1 signaling regulates endosomal traffic and cellular proliferation during tissue homeostasis. J. Cell Biol 2006, 175, 861–868. [Google Scholar]
  158. Sancak, Y.; Bar-Peled, L.; Zoncu, R.; Markhard, A.L.; Nada, S.; Sabatini, D.M. Ragulator-Rag complex targets mTORC1 to the lysosomal surface and is necessary for its activation by amino acids. Cell 2010, 141, 290–303. [Google Scholar]
  159. Ferguson, S.S.; Downey, W.E., 3rd; Colapietro, A.M.; Barak, L.S.; Menard, L.; Caron, M.G. Role of beta-arrestin in mediating agonist-promoted G protein-coupled receptor internalization. Science 1996, 271, 363–366. [Google Scholar]
  160. Pitcher, J.A.; Freedman, N.J.; Lefkowitz, R.J. G protein-coupled receptor kinases. Annu. Rev. Biochem 1998, 67, 653–692. [Google Scholar]
  161. Kovacs, J.J.; Hara, M.R.; Davenport, C.L.; Kim, J.; Lefkowitz, R.J. Arrestin development: Emerging roles for beta-arrestins in developmental signaling pathways. Dev. Cell 2009, 17, 443–458. [Google Scholar]
  162. Gurevich, E.V.; Gurevich, V.V. Arrestins: Ubiquitous regulators of cellular signaling pathways. Genome Biol 2006, 7, 236. [Google Scholar]
  163. Martin, N.P.; Lefkowitz, R.J.; Shenoy, S.K. Regulation of V2 vasopressin receptor degradation by agonist-promoted ubiquitination. J. Biol. Chem 2003, 278, 45954–45959. [Google Scholar]
  164. Shenoy, S.K.; Lefkowitz, R.J. Trafficking patterns of beta-arrestin and G protein-coupled receptors determined by the kinetics of beta-arrestin deubiquitination. J. Biol. Chem 2003, 278, 14498–14506. [Google Scholar]
  165. Shenoy, S.K.; McDonald, P.H.; Kohout, T.A.; Lefkowitz, R.J. Regulation of receptor fate by ubiquitination of activated beta 2-adrenergic receptor and beta-arrestin. Science 2001, 294, 1307–1313. [Google Scholar]
  166. Shenoy, S.K.; Xiao, K.; Venkataramanan, V.; Snyder, P.M.; Freedman, N.J.; Weissman, A.M. Nedd4 mediates agonist-dependent ubiquitination, lysosomal targeting, and degradation of the beta2-adrenergic receptor. J. Biol. Chem 2008, 283, 22166–22176. [Google Scholar]
  167. Shenoy, S.K.; Barak, L.S.; Xiao, K.; Ahn, S.; Berthouze, M.; Shukla, A.K.; Luttrell, L.M.; Lefkowitz, R.J. Ubiquitination of beta-arrestin links seven-transmembrane receptor endocytosis and ERK activation. J. Biol. Chem 2007, 282, 29549–29562. [Google Scholar]
  168. Ma, L.; Pei, G. Beta-arrestin signaling and regulation of transcription. J. Cell Sci 2007, 120, 213–218. [Google Scholar]
  169. Shenoy, S.K.; Drake, M.T.; Nelson, C.D.; Houtz, D.A.; Xiao, K.; Madabushi, S.; Reiter, E.; Premont, R.T.; Lichtarge, O.; Lefkowitz, R.J. Beta-arrestin-dependent, G protein-independent ERK1/2 activation by the beta2 adrenergic receptor. J. Biol. Chem 2006, 281, 1261–1273. [Google Scholar]
  170. DeWire, S.M.; Ahn, S.; Lefkowitz, R.J.; Shenoy, S.K. Beta-arrestins and cell signaling. Annu. Rev. Physiol 2007, 69, 483–510. [Google Scholar]
  171. DeFea, K.A.; Zalevsky, J.; Thoma, M.S.; Dery, O.; Mullins, R.D.; Bunnett, N.W. beta-arrestin-dependent endocytosis of proteinase-activated receptor 2 is required for intracellular targeting of activated ERK1/2. J. Cell Biol 2000, 148, 1267–1281. [Google Scholar]
  172. Lin, F.T.; Miller, W.E.; Luttrell, L.M.; Lefkowitz, R.J. Feedback regulation of beta-arrestin1 function by extracellular signal-regulated kinases. J. Biol. Chem 1999, 274, 15971–15974. [Google Scholar]
  173. Lin, F.T.; Krueger, K.M.; Kendall, H.E.; Daaka, Y.; Fredericks, Z.L.; Pitcher, J.A.; Lefkowitz, R.J. Clathrin-mediated endocytosis of the beta-adrenergic receptor is regulated by phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of beta-arrestin1. J. Biol. Chem 1997, 272, 31051–31057. [Google Scholar]
  174. McDonald, P.H.; Chow, C.W.; Miller, W.E.; Laporte, S.A.; Field, M.E.; Lin, F.T.; Davis, R.J.; Lefkowitz, R.J. Beta-arrestin 2: A receptor-regulated MAPK scaffold for the activation of JNK3. Science 2000, 290, 1574–1577. [Google Scholar]
  175. Conner, D.A.; Mathier, M.A.; Mortensen, R.M.; Christe, M.; Vatner, S.F.; Seidman, C.E.; Seidman, J.G. Beta-Arrestin1 knockout mice appear normal but demonstrate altered cardiac responses to beta-adrenergic stimulation. Circ Res 1997, 81, 1021–1026. [Google Scholar]
  176. Bohn, L.M.; Lefkowitz, R.J.; Gainetdinov, R.R.; Peppel, K.; Caron, M.G.; Lin, F.T. Enhanced morphine analgesia in mice lacking beta-arrestin 2. Science 1999, 286, 2495–2498. [Google Scholar]
  177. Kohout, T.A.; Lin, F.S.; Perry, S.J.; Conner, D.A.; Lefkowitz, R.J. beta-Arrestin 1 and 2 differentially regulate heptahelical receptor signaling and trafficking. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 1601–1606. [Google Scholar]
  178. Kouhara, H.; Hadari, Y.R.; Spivak-Kroizman, T.; Schilling, J.; Bar-Sagi, D.; Lax, I.; Schlessinger, J. A lipid-anchored Grb2-binding protein that links FGF-receptor activation to the Ras/MAPK signaling pathway. Cell 1997, 89, 693–702. [Google Scholar]
  179. Delahaye, L.; Rocchi, S.; Van Obberghen, E. Potential involvement of FRS2 in insulin signaling. Endocrinology 2000, 141, 621–628. [Google Scholar]
  180. Hadari, Y.R.; Gotoh, N.; Kouhara, H.; Lax, I.; Schlessinger, J. Critical role for the docking-protein FRS2 alpha in FGF receptor-mediated signal transduction pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 8578–8583. [Google Scholar]
  181. Kurokawa, K.; Iwashita, T.; Murakami, H.; Hayashi, H.; Kawai, K.; Takahashi, M. Identification of SNT/FRS2 docking site on RET receptor tyrosine kinase and its role for signal transduction. Oncogene 2001, 20, 1929–1938. [Google Scholar]
  182. Meakin, S.O.; MacDonald, J.I.; Gryz, E.A.; Kubu, C.J.; Verdi, J.M. The signaling adapter FRS-2 competes with Shc for binding to the nerve growth factor receptor TrkA. A model for discriminating proliferation and differentiation. J. Biol. Chem 1999, 274, 9861–9870. [Google Scholar]
  183. Melillo, R.M.; Santoro, M.; Ong, S.H.; Billaud, M.; Fusco, A.; Hadari, Y.R.; Schlessinger, J.; Lax, I. Docking protein FRS2 links the protein tyrosine kinase RET and its oncogenic forms with the mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling cascade. Mol. Cell. Biol 2001, 21, 4177–4187. [Google Scholar]
  184. Yamada, S.; Taketomi, T.; Yoshimura, A. Model analysis of difference between EGF pathway and FGF pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 2004, 314, 1113–1120. [Google Scholar]
  185. Ong, S.H.; Guy, G.R.; Hadari, Y.R.; Laks, S.; Gotoh, N.; Schlessinger, J.; Lax, I. FRS2 proteins recruit intracellular signaling pathways by binding to diverse targets on fibroblast growth factor and nerve growth factor receptors. Mol. Cell. Biol 2000, 20, 979–989. [Google Scholar]
  186. Dhalluin, C.; Yan, K.S.; Plotnikova, O.; Lee, K.W.; Zeng, L.; Kuti, M.; Mujtaba, S.; Goldfarb, M.P.; Zhou, M.M. Structural basis of SNT PTB domain interactions with distinct neurotrophic receptors. Mol. Cell 2000, 6, 921–929. [Google Scholar]
  187. Easton, J.B.; Royer, A.R.; Middlemas, D.S. The protein tyrosine phosphatase, Shp2, is required for the complete activation of the RAS/MAPK pathway by brain-derived neurotrophic factor. J. Neurochem 2006, 97, 834–845. [Google Scholar]
  188. Xu, H.; Lee, K.W.; Goldfarb, M. Novel recognition motif on fibroblast growth factor receptor mediates direct association and activation of SNT adapter proteins. J. Biol. Chem 1998, 273, 17987–17990. [Google Scholar]
  189. Hadari, Y.R.; Kouhara, H.; Lax, I.; Schlessinger, J. Binding of Shp2 tyrosine phosphatase to FRS2 is essential for fibroblast growth factor-induced PC12 cell differentiation. Mol. Cell. Biol 1998, 18, 3966–3973. [Google Scholar]
  190. Ong, S.H.; Hadari, Y.R.; Gotoh, N.; Guy, G.R.; Schlessinger, J.; Lax, I. Stimulation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase by fibroblast growth factor receptors is mediated by coordinated recruitment of multiple docking proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 6074–6079. [Google Scholar]
  191. Wong, A.; Lamothe, B.; Lee, A.; Schlessinger, J.; Lax, I. FRS2 alpha attenuates FGF receptor signaling by Grb2-mediated recruitment of the ubiquitin ligase Cbl. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 6684–6689. [Google Scholar]
  192. McDougall, K.; Kubu, C.; Verdi, J.M.; Meakin, S.O. Developmental expression patterns of the signaling adapters FRS-2 and FRS-3 during early embryogenesis. Mech. Dev 2001, 103, 145–148. [Google Scholar]
  193. Gotoh, N.; Laks, S.; Nakashima, M.; Lax, I.; Schlessinger, J. FRS2 family docking proteins with overlapping roles in activation of MAP kinase have distinct spatial-temporal patterns of expression of their transcripts. FEBS Lett 2004, 564, 14–18. [Google Scholar]
  194. Vomastek, T.; Schaeffer, H.J.; Tarcsafalvi, A.; Smolkin, M.E.; Bissonette, E.A.; Weber, M.J. Modular construction of a signaling scaffold: MORG1 interacts with components of the ERK cascade and links ERK signaling to specific agonists. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 6981–6986. [Google Scholar]
  195. Hopfer, U.; Hopfer, H.; Jablonski, K.; Stahl, R.A.; Wolf, G. The novel WD-repeat protein Morg1 acts as a molecular scaffold for hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase 3 (PHD3). J. Biol. Chem 2006, 281, 8645–8655. [Google Scholar]
  196. Haase, D.; Keiner, S.; Mawrin, C.; Wolf, G. Reduced Morg1 expression in ischemic human brain. Neurosci. Lett 2009, 455, 46–50. [Google Scholar]
  197. Hammerschmidt, E.; Loeffler, I.; Wolf, G. Morg1 heterozygous mice are protected from acute renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. Am. J. Physiol. Renal. Physiol 2009, 297, F1273–F1287. [Google Scholar]
  198. Stahr, A.; Frahm, C.; Kretz, A.; Bondeva, T.; Witte, O.W.; Wolf, G. Morg1(+/−) heterozygous mice are protected from experimentally induced focal cerebral ischemia. Brain Res 2012, 1482, 22–31. [Google Scholar]
  199. Simons, K.; Gerl, M.J. Revitalizing membrane rafts: New tools and insights. Nat. Rev 2010, 11, 688–699. [Google Scholar]
  200. Simons, K.; Sampaio, J.L. Membrane organization and lipid rafts. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol 2011, 3, a004697. [Google Scholar]
  201. Bickel, P.E.; Scherer, P.E.; Schnitzer, J.E.; Oh, P.; Lisanti, M.P.; Lodish, H.F. Flotillin and epidermal surface antigen define a new family of caveolae-associated integral membrane proteins. J. Biol. Chem 1997, 272, 13793–13802. [Google Scholar]
  202. Schulte, T.; Paschke, K.A.; Laessing, U.; Lottspeich, F.; Stuermer, C.A. Reggie-1 and reggie-2, two cell surface proteins expressed by retinal ganglion cells during axon regeneration. Development 1997, 124, 577–587. [Google Scholar]
  203. Banning, A.; Tomasovic, A.; Tikkanen, R. Functional aspects of membrane association of reggie/flotillin proteins. Curr. Protein Peptide Sci 2011, 12, 725–735. [Google Scholar]
  204. Babuke, T.; Ruonala, M.; Meister, M.; Amaddii, M.; Genzler, C.; Esposito, A.; Tikkanen, R. Hetero-oligomerization of reggie-1/flotillin-2 and reggie-2/flotillin-1 is required for their endocytosis. Cell. Signal 2009, 21, 1287–1297. [Google Scholar]
  205. Babuke, T.; Tikkanen, R. Dissecting the molecular function of reggie/flotillin proteins. Eur. J. Cell Biol 2007, 86, 525–532. [Google Scholar]
  206. Frick, M.; Bright, N.A.; Riento, K.; Bray, A.; Merrified, C.; Nichols, B.J. Coassembly of flotillins induces formation of membrane microdomains, membrane curvature, and vesicle budding. Curr. Biol 2007, 17, 1151–1156. [Google Scholar]
  207. Morrow, I.C.; Rea, S.; Martin, S.; Prior, I.A.; Prohaska, R.; Hancock, J.F.; James, D.E.; Parton, R.G. Flotillin-1/reggie-2 traffics to surface raft domains via a novel golgi-independent pathway. Identification of a novel membrane targeting domain and a role for palmitoylation. J. Biol. Chem 2002, 277, 48834–48841. [Google Scholar]
  208. Neumann-Giesen, C.; Falkenbach, B.; Beicht, P.; Claasen, S.; Luers, G.; Stuermer, C.A.; Herzog, V.; Tikkanen, R. Membrane and raft association of reggie-1/flotillin-2: Role of myristoylation, palmitoylation and oligomerization and induction of filopodia by overexpression. Biochem. J 2004, 378, 509–518. [Google Scholar]
  209. Neumann-Giesen, C.; Fernow, I.; Amaddii, M.; Tikkanen, R. Role of EGF-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of reggie-1/flotillin-2 in cell spreading and signaling to the actin cytoskeleton. J. Cell Sci 2007, 120, 395–406. [Google Scholar]
  210. Solis, G.P.; Hoegg, M.; Munderloh, C.; Schrock, Y.; Malaga-Trillo, E.; Rivera-Milla, E.; Stuermer, C.A. Reggie/flotillin proteins are organized into stable tetramers in membrane microdomains. Biochem. J 2007, 403, 313–322. [Google Scholar]
  211. Dermine, J.F.; Duclos, S.; Garin, J.; St-Louis, F.; Rea, S.; Parton, R.G.; Desjardins, M. Flotillin-1-enriched lipid raft domains accumulate on maturing phagosomes. J. Biol. Chem 2001, 276, 18507–18512. [Google Scholar]
  212. Glebov, O.O.; Bright, N.A.; Nichols, B.J. Flotillin-1 defines a clathrin-independent endocytic pathway in mammalian cells. Nat. Cell. Biol 2006, 8, 46–54. [Google Scholar]
  213. Santamaria, A.; Castellanos, E.; Gomez, V.; Benedit, P.; Renau-Piqueras, J.; Morote, J.; Reventos, J.; Thomson, T.M.; Paciucci, R. PTOV1 enables the nuclear translocation and mitogenic activity of flotillin-1, a major protein of lipid rafts. Mol. Cell. Biol 2005, 25, 1900–1911. [Google Scholar]
  214. Stuermer, C.A.; Lang, D.M.; Kirsch, F.; Wiechers, M.; Deininger, S.O.; Plattner, H. Glycosylphosphatidyl inositol-anchored proteins and fyn kinase assemble in noncaveolar plasma membrane microdomains defined by reggie-1 and −2. Mol. Biol. Cell 2001, 12, 3031–3045. [Google Scholar]
  215. Raemaekers, T.; Peric, A.; Baatsen, P.; Sannerud, R.; Declerck, I.; Baert, V.; Michiels, C.; Annaert, W. ARF6-mediated endosomal transport of Telencephalin affects dendritic filopodia-to-spine maturation. EMBO J 2012, 31, 3252–3269. [Google Scholar]
  216. Banning, A.; Ockenga, W.; Finger, F.; Siebrasse, P.; Tikkanen, R. Transcriptional regulation of flotillins by the extracellularly regulated kinases and retinoid X receptor complexes. PLoS One 2012, 7, e45514. [Google Scholar]
  217. Amaddii, M.; Meister, M.; Banning, A.; Tomasovic, A.; Mooz, J.; Rajalingam, K.; Tikkanen, R. Flotillin-1/reggie-2 protein plays dual role in activation of receptor-tyrosine kinase/mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling. J. Biol. Chem 2012, 287, 7265–7278. [Google Scholar]
  218. Lin, C.; Wu, Z.; Lin, X.; Yu, C.; Shi, T.; Zeng, Y.; Wang, X.; Li, J.; Song, L. Knockdown of FLOT1 impairs cell proliferation and tumorigenicity in breast cancer through upregulation of FOXO3a. Clin. Cancer Res 2011, 17, 3089–3099. [Google Scholar]
  219. Cremona, M.L.; Matthies, H.J.; Pau, K.; Bowton, E.; Speed, N.; Lute, B.J.; Anderson, M.; Sen, N.; Robertson, S.D.; Vaughan, R.A.; et al. Flotillin-1 is essential for PKC-triggered endocytosis and membrane microdomain localization of DAT. Nat. Neurosci 2011, 14, 469–477. [Google Scholar]
  220. Langhorst, M.F.; Solis, G.P.; Hannbeck, S.; Plattner, H.; Stuermer, C.A. Linking membrane microdomains to the cytoskeleton: Regulation of the lateral mobility of reggie-1/flotillin-2 by interaction with actin. FEBS Lett 2007, 581, 4697–4703. [Google Scholar]
  221. Hazarika, P.; McCarty, M.F.; Prieto, V.G.; George, S.; Babu, D.; Koul, D.; Bar-Eli, M.; Duvic, M. Up-regulation of Flotillin-2 is associated with melanoma progression and modulates expression of the thrombin receptor protease activated receptor 1. Cancer Res 2004, 64, 7361–7369. [Google Scholar]
  222. Kato, N.; Nakanishi, M.; Hirashima, N. Flotillin-1 regulates IgE receptor-mediated signaling in rat basophilic leukemia (RBL-2H3) cells. J. Immunol 2006, 177, 147–154. [Google Scholar]
  223. Limpert, A.S.; Karlo, J.C.; Landreth, G.E. Nerve growth factor stimulates the concentration of TrkA within lipid rafts and extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation through c-Cbl-associated protein. Mol. Cell. Biol 2007, 27, 5686–5698. [Google Scholar]
  224. Sugawara, Y.; Nishii, H.; Takahashi, T.; Yamauchi, J.; Mizuno, N.; Tago, K.; Itoh, H. The lipid raft proteins flotillins/reggies interact with Galphaq and are involved in Gq-mediated p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase activation through tyrosine kinase. Cell. Signal 2007, 19, 1301–1308. [Google Scholar]
  225. Riento, K.; Frick, M.; Schafer, I.; Nichols, B.J. Endocytosis of flotillin-1 and flotillin-2 is regulated by Fyn kinase. J. Cell Sci 2009, 122, 912–918. [Google Scholar]
  226. Baumann, C.A.; Ribon, V.; Kanzaki, M.; Thurmond, D.C.; Mora, S.; Shigematsu, S.; Bickel, P.E.; Pessin, J.E.; Saltiel, A.R. CAP defines a second signalling pathway required for insulin-stimulated glucose transport. Nature 2000, 407, 202–207. [Google Scholar]
  227. Tomasovic, A.; Traub, S.; Tikkanen, R. Molecular networks in FGF signaling: Flotillin-1 and cbl-associated protein compete for the binding to fibroblast growth factor receptor substrate 2. PLoS One 2012, 7, e29739. [Google Scholar]
  228. Lax, I.; Wong, A.; Lamothe, B.; Lee, A.; Frost, A.; Hawes, J.; Schlessinger, J. The docking protein FRS2alpha controls a MAP kinase-mediated negative feedback mechanism for signaling by FGF receptors. Mol. Cell 2002, 10, 709–719. [Google Scholar]
  229. Wu, Y.; Chen, Z.; Ullrich, A. EGFR and FGFR signaling through FRS2 is subject to negative feedback control by ERK1/2. Biol. Chem 2003, 384, 1215–1226. [Google Scholar]
  230. Pullikuth, A.; McKinnon, E.; Schaeffer, H.J.; Catling, A.D. The MEK1 scaffolding protein MP1 regulates cell spreading by integrating PAK1 and Rho signals. Mol. Cell. Biol 2005, 25, 5119–5133. [Google Scholar]
  231. Slack-Davis, J.K.; Eblen, S.T.; Zecevic, M.; Boerner, S.A.; Tarcsafalvi, A.; Diaz, H.B.; Marshall, M.S.; Weber, M.J.; Parsons, J.T.; Catling, A.D. PAK1 phosphorylation of MEK1 regulates fibronectin-stimulated MAPK activation. J. Cell Biol 2003, 162, 281–291. [Google Scholar]
  232. Vomastek, T.; Iwanicki, M.P.; Schaeffer, H.J.; Tarcsafalvi, A.; Parsons, J.T.; Weber, M.J. RACK1 targets the extracellular signal-regulated kinase/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway to link integrin engagement with focal adhesion disassembly and cell motility. Mol. Cell. Biol 2007, 27, 8296–8305. [Google Scholar]
Ijms 14 04854f1 1024
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade. Activation of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK) results in recruitment of the adaptor, growth factor receptor-bound protein 2 (Grb2) and the guanine exchange factor (GEF), son of sevenless homologue (Sos), which then interacts with and activates Ras. This results in activation of C-Raf and, thereby, the initiation of sequential phosphorylation steps of the MAPK cascade. Activated ERK can phosphorylate either cytosolic or nuclear substrates.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 1. Schematic representation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade. Activation of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK) results in recruitment of the adaptor, growth factor receptor-bound protein 2 (Grb2) and the guanine exchange factor (GEF), son of sevenless homologue (Sos), which then interacts with and activates Ras. This results in activation of C-Raf and, thereby, the initiation of sequential phosphorylation steps of the MAPK cascade. Activated ERK can phosphorylate either cytosolic or nuclear substrates.
Ijms 14 04854f1 1024
Ijms 14 04854f2 1024
Figure 2. Characteristics of scaffolding proteins. (left) The model postulating a free diffusion of signaling proteins is not able to sufficiently explain the efficiency of signaling; (middle) scaffolding proteins contain several domains for the binding of their interactors and serve as platforms for efficient signal transduction; (right) local adaptors function as specific subcellular anchors for the scaffolding protein and its interactors to cellular subcompartments, such as the plasma membrane or endosomes.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 2. Characteristics of scaffolding proteins. (left) The model postulating a free diffusion of signaling proteins is not able to sufficiently explain the efficiency of signaling; (middle) scaffolding proteins contain several domains for the binding of their interactors and serve as platforms for efficient signal transduction; (right) local adaptors function as specific subcellular anchors for the scaffolding protein and its interactors to cellular subcompartments, such as the plasma membrane or endosomes.
Ijms 14 04854f2 1024
Ijms 14 04854f3 1024
Figure 3. Flotillins are novel scaffolding proteins for the ERK/MAPK pathway. Both flotillins associate with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and are necessary for a proper activation of the receptor and its downstream MAPK signaling pathway. Flotillin-1, which is found in hetero-oligomers with flotillin-2, is a scaffolding protein for C-Raf, MAPK/ERK kinase 1 (MEK1) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2 (ERK2) independently of kinase suppressor of Ras (KSR1). A nuclear target gene of the flotillin scaffolded MAPK cascade is cyclin D1, but flotillins can also influence cytosolic ERK activity.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 3. Flotillins are novel scaffolding proteins for the ERK/MAPK pathway. Both flotillins associate with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and are necessary for a proper activation of the receptor and its downstream MAPK signaling pathway. Flotillin-1, which is found in hetero-oligomers with flotillin-2, is a scaffolding protein for C-Raf, MAPK/ERK kinase 1 (MEK1) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2 (ERK2) independently of kinase suppressor of Ras (KSR1). A nuclear target gene of the flotillin scaffolded MAPK cascade is cyclin D1, but flotillins can also influence cytosolic ERK activity.
Ijms 14 04854f3 1024
Int. J. Mol. Sci. EISSN 1422-0067 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert