Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14(12), 24320-24337; doi:10.3390/ijms141224320
Article

Comparability of in Vitro Tests for Bioactive Nanoparticles: A Common Assay to Detect Reactive Oxygen Species as an Example

1 Empa, Materials-Biology Interactions Laboratory, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Lerchenfeldstrasse 5, CH-9014 St. Gallen, Switzerland 2 Empa, Head of Research Focus Area Health & Performance, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Lerchenfeldstrasse 5, CH-9014 St. Gallen, Switzerland These authors contributed equally to this work.
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 23 October 2013; in revised form: 10 December 2013 / Accepted: 11 December 2013 / Published: 13 December 2013
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioactive Nanoparticles 2014)
PDF Full-text Download PDF Full-Text [829 KB, Updated Version, uploaded 16 December 2013 20:12 CET]
The original version is still available [798 KB, uploaded 13 December 2013 12:13 CET]
Abstract: The release of reactive oxygen species (ROS) during the electron transport of mitochondrial aerobic respiration is the major source of ROS. However, contact between cells and nanoparticles (NPs) can also induce release of ROS, leading to an imbalance towards the pro-oxidative state. At low levels of ROS production, cells initiate a protective response to guarantee their survival, but an excess of ROS can damage cellular compounds such as membranes and various organelles, or directly cause genotoxicity. Thus an elevated level of ROS is an important indicator of cellular stress and an accurate recording of this parameter would be very informative. ROS can be measured by various assays, but all known assays measuring and quantifying ROS possess certain weaknesses. The problems and challenges of quantitatively detecting ROS in vitro using the 2',7'-dichlorodihydrofluorescein (DCF) assay is discussed as an example. In addition, we debate the difficulties in finding a suitable and stable chemical reaction control for the DCF assay (or other ROS-detecting assays). As a conclusion, we believe that using 3-morpholinosydnonimine hydrochloride (Sin-1) as a ROS inducer in the DCF assay is feasible only qualitatively. However, a quantitative measurement of the absolute amount of ROS produced and a quantitative comparison between experiments is (at the moment) impossible.
Keywords: chemical reaction control; comparability; DCF assay; interference; nanoparticles; reactive oxygen species (ROS); Sin-1

Article Statistics

Load and display the download statistics.

Citations to this Article

Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Roesslein, M.; Hirsch, C.; Kaiser, J.-P.; Krug, H.F.; Wick, P. Comparability of in Vitro Tests for Bioactive Nanoparticles: A Common Assay to Detect Reactive Oxygen Species as an Example. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 24320-24337.

AMA Style

Roesslein M, Hirsch C, Kaiser J-P, Krug HF, Wick P. Comparability of in Vitro Tests for Bioactive Nanoparticles: A Common Assay to Detect Reactive Oxygen Species as an Example. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2013; 14(12):24320-24337.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Roesslein, Matthias; Hirsch, Cordula; Kaiser, Jean-Pierre; Krug, Harald F.; Wick, Peter. 2013. "Comparability of in Vitro Tests for Bioactive Nanoparticles: A Common Assay to Detect Reactive Oxygen Species as an Example." Int. J. Mol. Sci. 14, no. 12: 24320-24337.

Int. J. Mol. Sci. EISSN 1422-0067 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert