- freely available
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14(1), 999-1021; doi:10.3390/ijms14010999
Published: 7 January 2013
Abstract: Gd2InSbO7 and Gd2FeSbO7 were synthesized first, and their structural and photocatalytic properties were studied. The lattice parameters and the band gaps for Gd2InSbO7 and Gd2FeSbO7 were 10.449546 Å, 10.276026 Å, 2.897 eV and 2.151 eV. The photocatalytic degradation of rhodamine B was performed with Gd2InSbO7 and Gd2FeSbO7 under visible light irradiation. Gd2InSbO7 and Gd2FeSbO7 had higher catalytic activity compared with Bi2InTaO7. Gd2FeSbO7 exhibited higher catalytic activity than Gd2InSbO7. The photocatalytic degradation of rhodamine B followed with the first-order reaction kinetics, and the first-order rate constant k was 0.01606, 0.02220 or 0.00329 min−1 with Gd2InSbO7, Gd2FeSbO7 or Bi2InTaO7 as photocatalyst. Complete removal of rhodamine B was observed after visible light irradiation for 225 min or 260 min with Gd2FeSbO7 or Gd2InSbO7 as photocatalyst. The evolution of CO2 was realized, and it indicated continuous mineralization of rhodamine B during the photocatalytic process. The possible photocatalytic degradation pathway of rhodamine B was proposed.
Nowadays, with the development of industry, wastewater is yielded in bulk. Particularly, some industries, such as textile and dyeing manufacturing, produce a large amount of dyestuff wastewater . These dyestuffs are usually synthetic aromatic compounds, which are seriously harmful to the aquatic biota. Moreover, the coloration of the wastewater in streams or lakes would absolutely influence the solar illumination, which would affect the growth of creatures and hydrophytes. Among all kinds of dyestuff, rhodamine B (RhB) is one of the most important representatives of xanthene dyes. RhB is toxic and resistant to biodegradation and direct photolysis, thus RhB would have a considerable deleterious effect upon the environmental matrix. RhB undergoes natural reductive anaerobic degradation; as a result, potentially carcinogenic aromatic amines [2,3] are yielded. Moreover, RhB is widely used as a photosensitizer, a quantum counter and an active medium in dye lasers, etc. [4,5]. Thus, we use RhB as a probe contaminant to evaluate the activity of new photocatalysts, both under ultraviolet light and visible light irradiation.
In terms of the enormous harm of RhB dye wastewater, it was thoroughly urgent to remove RhB dye from effluents before they were emitted to natural water bodies. At present, several treatment measurements were adopted for RhB dye removal. For example, the technology of adsorption using absorbents [3,6–8], such as activated carbon, has been found to be an efficient technology for decolorization of wastewater. Although it was quite effective for activated carbon to adsorb RhB dye in wastewater, activated carbon was restricted from use because of its high cost and difficulty in being regenerated. Therefore, a novel processing method, photocatalysis, has been developed for removing RhB dye wastewater. Photocatalysis is an advanced oxidation processes and has aroused more and more attention by investigators [9–23], and much scientific research on the photocatalytic degradation of aqueous organic contaminants has been reported [10–31]. Some investigations [2,32–38] about the photodegradation of RhB have been reported under ultraviolet light or visible light irradiation, showing that photocatalysis was an effective degradation method for degrading dye to a large extent.
With the development of the investigation of the photocatalysis process, investigators also paid much attention to researching and developing novel photocatalysts [39–43]. Presently, TiO2 was the most common photocatalyst; however, TiO2 could not be used in the visible light region and could only degrade RhB under ultraviolet light irradiation. Moreover, ultraviolet light only occupied 4% of sunlight, which was a restrained factor for photocatalysis technology with TiO2 as the catalyst. Therefore, some efficient catalysts, which could generate electron-hole pairs under visible light irradiation, should be developed, because visible light occupies 43% of sunlight. Fortunately, A2B2O7 compounds were often considered to have photocatalytic properties under visible light irradiation. In our previous work , we have found that Bi2InTaO7 crystallized with the pyrochlore-type structure and acted as a photocatalyst under visible light irradiation and seemed to have a potential for improvement of the photocatalytic activity upon modification of its structure. Based on the above analysis, we could assume that substitution of Ta5+ by Sb5+, substitution of Bi3+ by Gd3+ and substitution of In3+ by Fe3+ in Bi2InTaO7 might increase carrier concentration; as a result, the new photocatalysts Gd2InSbO7 and Gd2FeSbO7 might have advanced photocatalytic properties. Gd2InSbO7 and Gd2FeSbO7 were never synthesized before and never used in the photocatalysis progress. The molecular composition of Gd2InSbO7 and Gd2FeSbO7 was very similar with other A2B2O7 compounds. Thus, the resemblance suggested that Gd2InSbO7 and Gd2FeSbO7 might possess photocatalytic properties under visible light irradiation, which was similar with the other members in the A2B2O7 family. This paper reported the preparation process and property characterization of Gd2InSbO7 and Gd2FeSbO7. Both Gd2InSbO7 and Gd2FeSbO7 were semiconductor compounds that were synthesized for the first time. In this contribution, we discussed the structural and photocatalytic properties of Gd2InSbO7 and Gd2FeSbO7 by degrading RhB under visible light irradiation and compared the photocatalytic activity among Gd2InSbO7, Gd2FeSbO7 and Bi2InTaO7 in order to elucidate the structure-photocatalytic activity relationship in these newly synthesized compounds.
2. Results and Discussion
Figure 1a,b show the SEM images of Gd2InSbO7 and Gd2FeSbO7 with low magnification. Figure 1c,d show the TEM images of Gd2InSbO7 and Gd2FeSbO7 with high magnification. The results showed that the particle diameter of Gd2FeSbO7 was 240 nm and the particle diameter of Gd2InSbO7 was 310 nm. The nanosized particles of Gd2FeSbO7 and Gd2InSbO7 were obtained, and these particles were in inhomogenous global shapes. Figure 1 revealed that the average particle size of Gd2FeSbO7 was smaller than that of Gd2InSbO7. There were two reasons to obtain nanocrystals in this experiment, while synthesizing Gd2InSbO7 and Gd2FeSbO7 powders by the solid-state method. Firstly, the powders, which were obtained after a sintering process by an electric furnace, would be ground by mortar three times and then would be ground in a ball mill three times. The total time for grinding the above photocatalyst powders was approximately 15 h. Secondly, the sizes of the photocatalyst particles were different. We utilized a centrifuge to realize separation of the photocatalyst particles, which had different sizes by adjusting the rotation speed of the centrifuge, and the small particles were obtained. SEM-EDS spectrum taken from the prepared Gd2FeSbO7 indicated the existence of gadolinium, iron, antimony and oxygen. As to the prepared Gd2InSbO7, gadolinium, indium, antimony and oxygen were detected and other elements were not identified.
X-ray powder diffraction patterns of Gd2FeSbO7 and Gd2InSbO7 are shown in Figure 2. Figure 3 displays the powder X-ray diffraction patterns of Gd2InSbO7 together with full-profile structure refinements of the collected data as obtained by the RIETAN™  program, which is based on Rietveld analysis. The results of the final refinement for Gd2FeSbO7 and Gd2InSbO7 manifested an excellent consistency between the observed and calculated intensities for the pyrochlore-type structure, a cubic crystal system and a space group Fd3m (O atoms were included in the model). The lattice parameters of Gd2InSbO7 and Gd2FeSbO7 were 10.449546 Å and 10.276026 Å, respectively. All the diffraction peaks for Gd2FeSbO7 and Gd2InSbO7 could be successfully indexed based on the lattice constant and above space group. The atomic coordinates and structural parameters of Gd2FeSbO7 and Gd2InSbO7 are listed in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. In addition, Our XRD results showed that Gd2FeSbO7 and Gd2InSbO7 crystallized with the same structure, and 2 theta angles of each reflection of Gd2InSbO7 changed with the substitution of In3+ by Fe3+. The lattice parameter decreased from α = 10.449546 Å for Gd2InSbO7 to α = 10.276026 Å for Gd2FeSbO7, indicating a decrease in the lattice parameter of the photocatalyst with the decrease of M ionic radii, Fe3+ (0.78 Å) < In3+ (0.92 Å). Figure 1e,f show the selected area electron diffraction patterns of Gd2InSbO7 and Gd2FeSbO7, respectively. It could be seen that Gd2InSbO7 and Gd2FeSbO7 crystallized with a cubic crystal system, and the lattice parameters α of Gd2InSbO7 and Gd2FeSbO7 were proved to be 10.449546 Å and 10.276026 Å, respectively. According to the calculation results from Figure 1e,f the main diffraction peaks (222), (440), (400) and (622) for Gd2InSbO7 and Gd2FeSbO7 could be found and indexed within Figure 1e,f.
Our X-ray diffraction outcomes showed that Gd2FeSbO7, Gd2InSbO7 and Bi2InTaO7 crystallized with the same pyrochlore-type structure. The cubic system structure with space group Fd3m for Bi2InTaO7 remained unchanged, with Ta5+ being substituted by Sb5+ and with Bi3+ being substituted by Gd3+. The cubic system structure with space group Fd3m for Bi2InTaO7 also remained unchanged with Ta5+ being substituted by Sb5+, with In3+ being substituted by Fe3+ and with Bi3+ being substituted by Gd3+. The result of refinements for Gd2FeSbO7 generated the unweighted R factors, RP = 16.20% with space group Fd3m. Similarly, the result of refinements for Gd2InSbO7 generated the unweighted R factors, RP = 12.13% with space group Fd3m. Zou et al. refined the crystal structure of Bi2InNbO7 and obtained a large R factor, which was owing to a slightly modified structure model for Bi2InNbO7. Based on the high purity of the precursors that were used in this study and the EDS results that did not trace any other elements, it was unlikely that the observed space groups originated from the presence of impurities. Therefore, it was suggested that the slightly high R factor for Gd2FeSbO7 or Gd2InSbO7 was due to a slightly modified structure model of Gd2FeSbO7 or Gd2InSbO7. It should be emphasized that the defects or the disorder/order of a fraction of the atoms could result in the change of structures, including different bond-distance distributions, thermal displacement parameters and/or occupation factors for some of the atoms.
The XPS spectra of Gd2FeSbO7 and Gd2InSbO7 were obtained. The various elemental peaks, which are corresponding to specific binding energies, are given in Table 3. The results further suggested that the oxidative valence state of Gd, Fe, Sb and O ions from Gd2FeSbO7 were +3, +3, +5 and −2, respectively. For Gd2FeSbO7, the mean atomic ratios of Gd: Fe: Sb: O were 2.00: 1.02: 0.99: 6.96 based on averaging our XPS, SEM-EDS and XFS results. Similarly, the oxidation state of Gd, In, Sb and O ions from Gd2InSbO7 were +3, +3, +5 and −2, respectively. For Gd2InSbO7, the mean atomic ratios of Gd: In: Sb: O were 2.00: 1.03: 0.97: 6.98 based on averaging our XPS, SEM-EDS and XFS results. Consequently, it could be deduced that the final materials were of high purity under our preparation conditions. It was noteworthy that neither shoulders nor widening of any XPS peaks of Gd2FeSbO7 or Gd2InSbO7 were observed, suggesting the absence of any other phases.
Figures 4 and 5 present the absorption spectra of Gd2FeSbO7 and Gd2InSbO7, respectively. In contrast to the well-known TiO2, whose absorption edge was less than 380 nm, the absorption edges of newly synthesized Gd2FeSbO7 and Gd2InSbO7 were found to be 586 nm and 428 nm, respectively, which were in the visible region of the spectrum. It was noteworthy that the apparent absorption (defined hereby as 1-transmission) could not take into consideration reflection and scattering. As a result, the apparent absorbance at sub-bandgap wavelengths (600 to 800 nm for Gd2FeSbO7 and 425 to 800 nm for Gd2InSbO7) was higher than zero.
For a crystalline semiconductor compound, the optical absorption near the band edge followed the equation [47,48]: αhν = A (hν-Eg)n. Here, A, α, Eg and ν denoted proportional constant, absorption coefficient, band gap and light frequency, respectively. In this equation, n determined the character of the transition in a semiconductor compound. Eg and n could be calculated by the following steps: (i) plotting ln(αhν) versus ln(hν-Eg) assuming an approximate value of Eg, (ii) deducing the value of n based on the slope in this graph and (iii) refining the value of Eg by plotting (αhν)1/nversus hν and extrapolating the plot to (αhν)1/n = 0. According to this method, Figure 6 shows the plot of (αhν)1/nversus hν for Gd2FeSbO7 and Gd2InSbO7. It was evidently to be found from Figure 6 that the values of Eg for Gd2FeSbO7 and Gd2InSbO7 were calculated to be 2.151 eV and 2.897 eV, respectively, while the values of n for Gd2FeSbO7 and Gd2InSbO7 were calculated to be 0.50 and 0.50, respectively, indicating that Gd2FeSbO7 possessed a narrower band gap compared with that of Gd2InSbO7.
2.2. Photocatalytic Activity
Generally, the photocatalytic process by semiconductors begins with the direct absorption of supra-bandgap photons and the generation of electron–hole pairs within semiconductor particles. This is followed by diffusion of the charge carriers to the surface of the semiconductor particle. Changes in the UV-Vis spectrum of rhodamine B (RhB) upon exposure to visible light (λ > 400 nm) with the presence of Gd2FeSbO7 or Gd2InSbO7 are depicted in Figure 7a,b, respectively. The measurements were performed under oxygen-saturation conditions ([O2]sat = 1.02 × 10−3 M). The degradation of RhB did not occur in darkness within the Gd2FeSbO7/RhB suspension or Gd2InSbO7/RhB suspension or Bi2InTaO7/RhB suspension or RhB suspension. It could be seen from Figure 7a and Figure 7b that a reduction of typical RhB peaks at 553.5 nm and 525 nm was clearly noticed. The results showed that the initial degradation rate of RhB was about 2.413 × 10−9 mol L−1 s−1, and the initial photonic efficiency was estimated to be 0.05069% (λ = 420 nm) for Gd2FeSbO7. Similarly, the initial degradation rate of RhB was about 2.322 × 10−9 mol L−1 s−1, and the initial photonic efficiency was estimated to be 0.04877% (λ = 420 nm) for Gd2InSbO7. For Bi2InTaO7, after visible light irradiation for 200 min, the RhB concentration decreased only from 0.0293 mM to 0.0161 mM, and the initial degradation rate of RhB was about 1.1 × 10−9 mol L−1 s−1. The initial photonic efficiency was estimated to be 0.02311% (λ = 420 nm) for Bi2InTaO7. By contrast, the photonic efficiency of Bi2InTaO7 was inferior to that of Gd2FeSbO7 or Gd2InSbO7.
The kinetics of RhB degradation deduced according to the spectral changes under visible light irradiation are shown in Figure 8, which describes the kinetics not only with Gd2FeSbO7, Gd2InSbO7 and Bi2InTaO7 as catalysts, but also without any photocatalyst. As expected, reduction of RhB signal in the controlled measurements in the absence of a photocatalyst was promising. In addition, the photodegradation removal rate of RhB was 90.35%, 77.80% and 26.62% after visible light irradiation for 80 min with Gd2FeSbO7, Gd2InSbO7 and Bi2InTaO7 as catalysts, respectively. Complete removal of rhodamine B was observed after visible light irradiation for 225 min or 260 min with Gd2FeSbO7 or Gd2InSbO7 as photocatalyst. Based on the above outcomes, it was much faster for Gd2FeSbO7 and Gd2InSbO7 to photodegrade RhB compared with Bi2InTaO7, and the photocatalytic degradation activity of Gd2FeSbO7 or Gd2InSbO7 for degrading RhB was higher than that of Bi2InTaO7; moreover, Gd2FeSbO7 showed higher photocatalytic degradation activity than Gd2InSbO7. The main reason was that the lattice parameter α = 10.746410 Å for Bi2InTaO7 was larger than the lattice parameter α = 10.449546 Å for Gd2InSbO7, and the lattice parameter α = 10.449546 Å for Gd2InSbO7 was larger than the lattice parameter α = 10.276026 Å for Gd2FeSbO7, which probably resulted in a decrease for the migration distance of photogenerated electrons and holes to reach the reaction site on the photocatalyst surface; subsequently, the creation of more active sites was realized. As a result, it would probably improve the photocatalytic activities by decreasing the lattice parameter of the photocatalyst.
The first order nature of the photocatalytic degradation kinetics with Gd2FeSbO7, Gd2InSbO7 and Bi2InTaO7 as catalysts is clearly exhibited in Figure 9, which describes a linear correlation between ln(C/C0) (or ln(TOC/TOC0)) and the irradiation time for the photocatalytic degradation of RhB under visible light irradiation by using Gd2FeSbO7 or Gd2InSbO7 or Bi2InTaO7 as catalyst. Here, C represented the RhB concentration at time t, and C0 represented the initial concentration of RhB. TOC represented the total organic carbon concentration at time t, and TOC0 denoted the initial total organic carbon concentration. According to the relationship between ln(C/C0) and the irradiation time, the apparent first-order rate constant k was estimated to be 0.02220 min−1 with Gd2FeSbO7 as catalyst, 0.01606 min−1 with Gd2InSbO7 as catalyst and 0.00329 min−1 with Bi2InTaO7 as catalyst, indicating that Gd2FeSbO7 and Gd2InSbO7 were more effective than Bi2InTaO7 for the photocatalytic degradation of RhB under visible light irradiation. Meanwhile, Gd2FeSbO7 showed more effective photocatalytic activity for degrading RhB than Gd2InSbO7. According to the relationship between ln(TOC/TOC0) and the irradiation time, the apparent first-order rate constant k was estimated to be 0.02024 min−1 with Gd2FeSbO7 as catalyst, 0.01348 min−1 with Gd2InSbO7 as catalyst and 0.00317 min−1 with Bi2InTaO7 as catalyst, indicating that the photodegradation intermediate products of RhB were probably produced during the photocatalytic degradation of RhB under visible light irradiation.
The photodegradation intermediate products of RhB in our experiment were identified as succinic acid (m/z = 118), terephthalic acid (m/z = 166), pentanedioic acid, 3-Hydroxybenzoic acid (m/z = 138), 1,2-benzenedicarboxylic acid and maleic acid (m/z = 116). Based on the intermediate products detected in this work, a possible photocatalytic degradation pathway for RhB is proposed in Figure 10. This pathway was similar, but not identical, to the pathway proposed by Horikoshi et al. for the photodegradation of RhB under ultraviolet light illumination assisted by microwave radiation with TiO2 as catalyst. According to the research from Zhang et al., the photodegradation of RhB occurred through two competitive processes: one was N-demethylation and the other one was the destruction of the conjugated structure. Thus, we considered that chromophore cleavage, opening-ring and mineralization would be the main photocatalytic degradation pathway of RhB in our experiment. RhB was converted to smaller organic species, which were ultimately mineralized into inorganic products, such as CO2 and water. Figure 11 shows CO2 yields during the photocatalytic degradation of RhB with Gd2FeSbO7, Gd2InSbO7 or Bi2InTaO7 as catalyst under visible light irradiation. The results indicated that the yielded CO2 increased gradually with the increase of reaction time by using Gd2FeSbO7, Gd2InSbO7 or Bi2InTaO7 as catalyst. The production rate of CO2 with Gd2FeSbO7 or Gd2InSbO7 as catalyst was higher than that with Bi2InTaO7 as catalyst, which was in line with the absorption curves (Figures 4 and 5) of Gd2FeSbO7 and Gd2InSbO7. For example, after visible light irradiation for 200 min, the CO2 production was 0.2366 mmol with Gd2FeSbO7 as catalyst, 0.2280 mmol with Gd2InSbO7 as catalyst and 0.1080 mmol with Bi2InTaO7 as catalyst.
Figure 12 shows the change of the total organic carbon (TOC) for photocatalytic degradation of rhodamine B during visible light irradiation with Gd2FeSbO7, Gd2InSbO7 or Bi2InTaO7 as catalyst. The TOC measurements revealed the disappearance of organic carbon when the RhB solution containing Gd2FeSbO7, Gd2InSbO7 or Bi2InTaO7 was exposed under visible light irradiation. The results showed that 86.70%, 70.49% or 25.26% of TOC decrease was obtained after visible light irradiation for 80 min with Gd2FeSbO7, Gd2InSbO7 or Bi2InTaO7 as catalyst, respectively. The turnover numbers, which were the ratio between total amount of evolved gas and exhausted catalyst, were calculated to be more than 0.18 or 0.19 for Gd2FeSbO7 or Gd2InSbO7 after 200 min of reaction time under visible light irradiation. The reactions ceased when the light was turned off, indicating an obvious photic response.
The photocatalytic performance of Gd2FeSbO7 and Gd2InSbO7 was remarkable under visible light irradiation. This superior quality could be even more bracing if one considered the fact that the specific surface areas of Gd2FeSbO7 and Gd2InSbO7 were further smaller than that of titanium dioxide. In this experiment, BET isotherm measurements gave a specific surface area of 4.12 m2 g−1, 3.26 m2 g−1 and 1.26 m2 g−1 for Gd2FeSbO7, Gd2InSbO7 and Bi2InTaO7, respectively, which was almost 12-times smaller than that of TiO2 (46.24 m2 g−1). The particle sizes of Gd2InSbO7 and Gd2FeSbO7 were uneven. We provide SEM images with low magnification of Gd2InSbO7 and Gd2FeSbO7. Simultaneously, we give the TEM images of Gd2InSbO7 and Gd2FeSbO7, which represent the average particle size. Because the particle size of Gd2InSbO7 and Gd2FeSbO7 compounds were greater than 230nm, their specific surface areas were less than 5 m2 g−1.
There are three main reasons to choose Gd for producing Gd2FeSbO7 and Gd2InSbO7 in this paper. Firstly, the substitution of Bi3+ by Gd3+ and the substitution of Ta5+ by Sb5+ in Bi2InTaO7 will produce smaller catalyst particles and increase the specific surface area, because the radii of Gd3+, Bi3+, Ta5+ and Sb5+ are 1.053 Å, 1.17 Å, 0.74 Å and 0.60 Å, which shows that the radius of Gd3+ is smaller than the radius of Bi3+, and the radius of Sb5+ is smaller than the radius of Ta5+. Similarly, the substitution of Bi3+ by Gd3+, the substitution of In3+ by Fe3+ and the substitution of Ta5+ by Sb5+ in Bi2InTaO7 will produce smaller catalyst particles and increase the specific surface area, because the radii of In3+ and Fe3+ are 0.92 Å and 0.78 Å, which shows that the radius of Gd3+ is smaller than the radius of Bi3+, the radius of Fe3+ is smaller than the radius of In3+ and the radius of Sb5+ is smaller than the radius of Ta5+. Thus, the active sites and the catalytic activity will increase. Secondly, the smaller catalyst particles probably result in a decrease of the migration distance of photogenerated electrons and holes, which are formed under visible light irradiation from the grain interior to reach the reaction site on the photocatalyst surface. Subsequently, the photogenerated electrons and the photogenerated holes that reach the surface of the particles in unit time increase, and the creation of more active sites is realized. As a result, it will probably improve the photocatalytic activities with decreasing the particle size of the photocatalyst. Thirdly, some literatures reported that Gd-containing catalyst had excellent catalytic performance [50–53].
Figure 4 and Figure 5 show the action spectra of RhB degradation in the presence of Gd2FeSbO7 or Gd2InSbO7 under visible light irradiation. A clear photonic efficiency (0.03921% at its maximal point for Gd2FeSbO7 and 0.03145% at its maximal point for Gd2InSbO7) at wavelengths that corresponded to sub-Eg energies of the photocatalysts (λ from 425 to 800 nm) was observed for Gd2FeSbO7 and Gd2InSbO7. The existence of photonic efficiency at energies where photons were not absorbed by the photocatalysts, and the correlation between the low-energy action spectrum and the absorption spectrum of RhB clearly demonstrated that any photodegradation at wavelengths above 479 nm should be attributed to the photosensitization by RhB dye itself, the mechanism showing as follows:
According to this mechanism, RhB adsorbed on Gd2FeSbO7 or Gd2InSbO7 was excited by visible light irradiation. Subsequently an electron was injected from the excited RhB to the conduction band of Gd2FeSbO7 or Gd2InSbO7, where the electron was scavenged by molecular oxygen. Scheme I served to explain the results obtained with Gd2FeSbO7 or Gd2InSbO7 as catalyst under visible light irradiation, where Gd2FeSbO7 or Gd2InSbO7 might serve to reduce recombination of photogenerated electrons and holes by scavenging of electrons .
The situation was different below 479 nm, where the photonic efficiency correlated well with the absorption spectra of Gd2FeSbO7 and Gd2InSbO7. This result evidently showed that the mechanism, which was responsible for the photodegradation of RhB, went through band gap excitation of Gd2FeSbO7 or Gd2InSbO7. Although detailed experiments about the effect of oxygen and water on the degradation mechanism were not performed, it was sensible to assume that the mechanism in the first steps was similar to the observed mechanism for Gd2FeSbO7 or Gd2InSbO7 under supra-bandgap irradiation, namely showing below:
Previous luminescent studies had shown that the closer the M–O–M bond angle was to 180°, the more delocalized was the excited state ; As a result, the charge carriers could move easily in the matrix. The mobility of the photoinduced electrons and holes influenced the photocatalytic activity, because high diffusivity increased the probability that the photogenerated electrons and holes would reach the reactive sites of the catalyst surface. Based on the above results, the lattice parameter α = 10.276026 Å for Gd2FeSbO7 was smaller than the lattice parameter α = 10.449546 Å for Gd2InSbO7, thus the photoinduced electrons and holes inside Gd2FeSbO7 was easier and faster to reach the reactive sites of the Gd2FeSbO7 surface than those inside Gd2InSbO7; as a result, the photocatalytic degradation activity of Gd2FeSbO7 was higher than that of Gd2InSbO7. Moreover, in this experiment, for Gd2FeSbO7, the Fe–O–Fe bond angle was 116.424°; at the same time, for Gd2InSbO7, the In–O–In bond angle was 123.338°. The above results showed that the Fe–O–Fe bond angle of Gd2FeSbO7 or the In–O–In bond angle of Gd2InSbO7 was close to 180°, thus the photocatalytic activity of Gd2FeSbO7 or Gd2InSbO7 was accordingly higher. Moreover, the In–O–In bond angle of Gd2InSbO7 was larger than the Fe–O–Fe bond angle of Gd2FeSbO7, which led to an increase of photocatalytic activity for Gd2InSbO7 compared with that of Gd2FeSbO7. The crystal structures of Gd2FeSbO7, Gd2InSbO7 and Bi2InTaO7 were the same, but their electronic structures were considered to be a little different. For Gd2FeSbO7 or Gd2InSbO7, Sb or In was a 5p-block metal element, Gd was a 5d-block rare earth metal element and Fe was a 3d-block metal element, but for Bi2InTaO7, Ta was a 5d-block metal element and Bi was a 6p-block metal element, indicating that the photocatalytic activity might be affected not only by the crystal structure of the photocatalysts, but also by the electronic structure of the photocatalysts. According to the above analysis, the difference of RhB photocatalytic degradation among Gd2FeSbO7, Gd2InSbO7 and Bi2InTaO7 could be mainly attributed to the difference of their crystalline structure and electronic structure.
Figure 13 shows the suggested band structures of Gd2FeSbO7 and Gd2InSbO7. The positions and width of the conduction band (CB) and the valence band (VB) were investigated by calculating the electronic band structure of Gd2FeSbO7 and Gd2InSbO7 with the plane-wave-based density functional method. The band structure calculations of Gd2FeSbO7 and Gd2InSbO7 were performed with the program of cambridge serial total energy package (CASTEP) and first-principles simulation. The CASTEP calculation was composed of the plane-wave pseudopotential total energy method according to the density functional theory. The generalized gradient approximation (GGA-PBE) and the geometry optimization were adopted. The selected unit cell for calculation was [Gd2FeSbO7]2 or [Gd2InSbO7]2. The pseudo-atomic calculations were accomplished for Gd2FeSbO7 with 5d16s2 (Gd), 3d64s2 (Fe), 5s25p3 (Sb) and 2s22p4 (O). The pseudo-atomic calculations were accomplished for Gd2InSbO7 with 5d16s2 (Gd), 5s25p1 (In), 5s25p3 (Sb) and 2s22p4 (O). The self-consistent field tolerance was 1.0 × 10−6 eV/atom. The core electrons were replaced by the ultra-soft pseudopotentials. The FFT grid of the basis was 40 × 30 × 30. The kinetic energy cutoff was 400 eV. 4 × 5 × 5 k-point, and the ultrasoft pseudopotential was applied in the above calculation. The total and partial density of the states of Gd2FeSbO7 and Gd2InSbO7 was taken into consideration. We determined the band structures of Gd2InSbO7 and Gd2FeSbO7 by borrowing ideas from the relevant literature [56–62]. Recently, the electronic structures of InMO4 (M = V, Nb and Ta) and BiVO4 were reported by Oshikiri et al. based on the first principles calculations . The conduction bands of InMO4 (M = V, Nb and Ta) were mainly composed of a dominant d orbital component from V 3d, Nb 4d and Ta 5d orbitals, respectively. The valence bands of BiVO4 were composed of a small Bi 6s orbital component and a dominant O 2p orbital component. The band structures of Gd2FeSbO7 and Gd2InSbO7 should be similar to that of the above compounds. Therefore, we concluded that the conduction band of Gd2FeSbO7 was composed of Gd 5d, Fe 3d and Sb 5p orbital components; meanwhile, the valence band of Gd2FeSbO7 was composed of a small dominant O 2p orbital component. Similarly, the conduction band of Gd2InSbO7 was composed of Gd 5d, In 5p and Sb 5p orbital components; moreover, the valence band of Gd2InSbO7 was composed of a small dominant O 2p orbital component. Direct absorption of photons by Gd2FeSbO7 or Gd2InSbO7 could produce electron–hole pairs within the catalyst, indicating that larger energy than the band gap of Gd2FeSbO7 or Gd2InSbO7 was necessary for decomposing RhB by photocatalysis.
The presented results indicated that the Gd2FeSbO7 (or Gd2InSbO7)-visible light photocatalysis system might be regarded as a method for practical treatment of diluted colored waste water. Our Gd2FeSbO7 (or Gd2InSbO7)-visible light photocatalysis system could be utilized for decolorization, purification and detoxification in the textile, printing and dyeing industries within semi-arid countries. We designed Gd2FeSbO7 (or Gd2InSbO7)-visible light photocatalysis system without demanding chemical reagents or using the high pressure of oxygen or heating. The decolorized and detoxified water was submitted to our new system for treatment, and the results showed that the Gd2FeSbO7 (or Gd2InSbO7)-visible light photocatalysis system might provide a valuable treatment for purifying and reusing colored aqueous effluents.
3. Experimental Section
The novel photocatalysts were synthesized by a solid-state reaction method. Gd2O3, Bi2O3, Fe2O3, In2O3, Sb2O5 and Ta2O5 with purity of 99.99% (Sinopharm Group Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) were used as starting materials. All powders were dried at 200 °C for 4 h before synthesis. For the sake of synthesizing Gd2FeSbO7, the precursors were stoichiometrically churned up, subsequently pressed into small columns and put into an alumina crucible (Shenyang Crucible Co., LTD, Shenyang, China). Eventually, calcination was performed at 1250 °C for 65 h in an electric furnace (KSL 1700X, Hefei Kejing Materials Technology CO., LTD, Hefei, China). Similarly, Gd2InSbO7 was prepared by calcination at 1320 °C for 65 h, and Bi2InTaO7 was prepared by calcination at 1050 °C for 46 h. The crystal structures of Gd2FeSbO7 and Gd2InSbO7 were analyzed by the powder X-ray diffraction method (D/MAX-RB, Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) with CuKα radiation (λ = 1.54056 angstrom). The data were collected at 295 K with a step-scan procedure in the range of 2θ = 10–100°. The step interval was 0.02°, and the time per step was 1.2 s. The chemical composition of Gd2InSbO7 and Gd2FeSbO7 was inspected by scanning electron microscope-X-ray energy dispersion spectrum (SEM-EDS, LEO 1530VP, LEO Electron Microscopy Inc., New York, NY, USA) and X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (XFS, ARL-9800, Thermo ARL, ARL Applied Research Laboratories S.A., Ecublens, Switzerland). The Gd3+ content, Sb5+ content, Fe3+ content, In3+ content and O2− content of Gd2FeSbO7 and Gd2InSbO7 were detected by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, ESCALABMK-2, VG Scientific Ltd., East Grinstead, UK). The chemical composition within the depth profile of Gd2FeSbO7 or Gd2InSbO7 was examined by the argon ion denudation method when X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy was used. The optical absorption of Gd2FeSbO7 and Gd2InSbO7 was analyzed with an UV-visible spectrophotometer (Lambda 40, Perkin-Elmer Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA). The surface areas of Gd2InSbO7, Gd2FeSbO7 and Bi2InTaO7 were surveyed by the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method (MS-21, Quantachrome Instruments Corporation, Boynton Beach, FL, USA), with N2 adsorption at liquid nitrogen temperature. The particle sizes of the photocatalysts were measured by Malvern’s mastersize-2000 particle size analyzer (Malvern Instruments Ltd, Worcestershire, United Kingdom). The particle morphology of Gd2FeSbO7 and Gd2InSbO7 were measured by transmission electron microscope (TEM, Tecnal F20 S-Twin, FEI Corporation, Hillsboro, OR, USA).
The photocatalytic degradation of rhodamine B (RhB) (Tianjin Kermel Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China) was performed with Gd2InSbO7 or Gd2FeSbO7 or Bi2InTaO7 powder (0.8 g) suspended in RhB (300 mL 0.0293 mmol) solution by a pyrex glass cell (Jiangsu Yancheng Huaou Industry, Yancheng, China). Before visible light irradiation, the suspensions were magnetically stirred in darkness for 45 min to make sure the establishment of an adsorption/desorption equilibrium among Gd2FeSbO7, Gd2InSbO7, Bi2InTaO7, the RhB dye and atmospheric oxygen. The photocatalytic reaction system was composed of a 300 W Xe arc lamp, which was a light resource, with the main emission wavelength at 436 nm (Nanjing JYZCPST CO., LTD, Nanjing, China), a magnetic stirrer and a cut-off filter (λ > 400 nm, Jiangsu Nantong JSOL Corporation, Nantong, China). The Xe arc lamp was surrounded by a quartz jacket and was placed inside a photoreactor quartz vessel (5.8 cm in diameter and 68 cm in length) by which a suspension of RhB and the photocatalyst was circulated. An outer recycling water glass jacket maintained a near constant reaction temperature (22 °C), and the solution was stirred and aerated continuously. Two milliliters aliquots were sampled at various time intervals. The incident photon flux Io measured by a radiometer (Model FZ-A, Photoelectric Instrument Factory Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China) was determined to be 4.76 × 10−6 Einstein L−1 s−1 under visible light irradiation (wavelength range of 400–700 nm). The incident photon flux on the photoreactor was varied by adjusting the distance between the photoreactor and the Xe arc lamp. The initial pH value of the liquid was 7.0 and was not adjusted subsequently. The concentration of RhB was determined based on the absorption at 553.5 nm measured by an UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Lambda 40, Perkin-Elmer Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA). The inorganic products obtained from RhB degradation were analyzed by ion chromatograph (DX-300, Dionex Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The identification of RhB and the degradation intermediate products of RhB were performed by gas chromatograph—mass spectrometer (GC-MS, HP 6890 series gas chromatograph, AT™ column, 20.3 m × 0.32 mm, ID of 0.25 μm) operating at 320 °C, which was connected to a HP 5973 mass selective detector and a flame ionization detector, with H2 as the carried gas. The intermediate products of RhB were measured by liquid chromatograph—mass spectrometer (LC-MS, Thermo Quest LCQ Duo, Atlanta, GA, USA, Beta Basic-C18 HPLC column: 150 × 2.1 mm, ID of 5 μm, Finnigan, Thermo, Atlanta, GA, USA). Here, post-photocatalysis solution (20 μL) was injected automatically into the LC-MS system. The eluent contained 60% methanol and 40% water, and the flow rate was 0.2 mL min−1. MS conditions included an electrospray ionization interface, a capillary temperature of 27 °C with a voltage of 19.00 V, a spray voltage of 5000 V and a constant sheath gas flow rate. The spectrum was acquired in the negative ion scan mode, sweeping the m/z range from 50 to 600. Evolution of CO2 was analyzed with an intersmat™ IGC120-MB gas chromatograph equipped with a porapack Q column (3 m in length and an inner diameter of 0.25 in.), which was connected to a catharometer detector.
The total organic carbon (TOC) concentration was determined with a TOC analyzer (TOC-5000, Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). The photonic efficiency was calculated according to the following equation :
where ϕ was the photonic efficiency (%), R was the rate of RhB degradation (Mol L−1 s−1) and Io was the incident photon flux (Einstein L−1 s−1).
Gd2FeSbO7 and Gd2InSbO7 were prepared by the solid-state reaction method for the first time. The structural, optical absorption and photocatalytic properties of Gd2FeSbO7 and Gd2InSbO7 were investigated and compared with Bi2InTaO7. XRD results indicated that Gd2FeSbO7 and Gd2InSbO7 crystallized with the pyrochlore-type structure, cubic crystal system and space group Fd3m. The lattice parameters of Gd2FeSbO7 and Gd2InSbO7 were found to be α = 10.276026 Å and α = 10.449546 Å. The band gaps of Gd2FeSbO7 and Gd2InSbO7 were estimated to be about 2.151 eV and 2.897 eV, indicating that Gd2FeSbO7 and Gd2InSbO7 showed a strong optical absorption in the visible light region (λ > 400 nm). Photocatalytic degradation of aqueous RhB was observed under visible light irradiation in the presence of Gd2FeSbO7 and Gd2InSbO7 accompanied with the formation of final products, such as CO2 and water. Complete removal of carbon from RhB was obtained, as indicated from TOC and CO2 yield measurements, with Gd2FeSbO7 or Gd2InSbO7 as catalyst under visible light irradiation. A Gd2FeSbO7 or (Gd2InSbO7) visible light photocatalysis system could be regarded as an effective way for treating textile industry wastewater. Gd2FeSbO7 or Gd2InSbO7 also showed higher photocatalytic activity compared with Bi2InTaO7 for RhB photocatalytic degradation under visible light irradiation. Moreover, Gd2FeSbO7 exhibited higher catalytic activity than Gd2InSbO7. The photocatalytic degradation of RhB was in line with the first-order reaction kinetics. The apparent first-order rate constant k was 0.01606, 0.02220 and 0.00318 min−1 with Gd2FeSbO7, Gd2InSbO7 or Bi2InTaO7 as catalyst. The possible photocatalytic degradation pathway of RhB was proposed under visible light irradiation.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21277067). This work was supported by a grant from the China-Israel Joint Research Program in Water Technology and Renewable Energy (No. 5). This work was supported by a grant from The Fourth Technological Development Scheming (Industry) Program of Suzhou City of China from 2010 (SYG201006). This work was supported by a grant from the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.
- Bhatnagar, A.; Jain, A.K. A comparative adsorption study with different industrial wastes as adsorbents for the removal of cationic dyes from water. J. Colloid Interface Sci 2005, 281, 49–55. [Google Scholar]
- Fu, H.B.; Pan, C.S.; Yao, W.Q.; Zhu, Y.F. Visible-light-induced degradation of rhodamine B by nanosized Bi2WO6. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 22432–22439. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, Y.P.; Zhao, J.Z.; Zhang, H.; Yang, S.F.; Qi, J.R.; Wang, Z.C.; Xu, H.D. Use of rice husk-based porous carbon for adsorption of Rhodamine B from aqueous solutions. Dyes Pigm 2005, 66, 123–128. [Google Scholar]
- Gupta, V.K.; Ali, I.; Saini, V.K. Removal of rhodamine B, fast green and methylene blue from wastewater using red mud, an aluminum industry waste. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res 2004, 43, 1740–1747. [Google Scholar]
- Fujii, T.; Nishikiori, H.; Tamura, T. Absorption-Spectra of Rhodamine-B dimers in dip-coated thin-films prepared by the sol-gel method. Chem. Phy. Lett 1995, 233, 424–429. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, S.B.; Li, H.T. Dye adsorption on unburned carbon: Kinetics and equilibrium. J. Hazard. Mater 2005, 126, 71–77. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, S.B.; Boyjoo, Y.; Choueib, A. A comparative study of dye removal using fly ash treated by different methods. Chemosphere 2005, 60, 1401–1407. [Google Scholar]
- Gupta, V.K.; Jain, R.; Malathi, S.; Nayak, A. Adsorption-desorption studies of indigocarmine from industrial effluents by using deoiled mustard and its comparison with charcoal. J. Colloid Interface Sci 2010, 348, 628–633. [Google Scholar]
- Ohsaki, H.; Kanai, N.; Fukunaga, Y.; Suzuki, M.; Watanabe, T.; Hashimoto, K. Photocatalytic properties of SnO2/TiO2 multilayers. Thin Solid Films 2006, 502, 138–142. [Google Scholar]
- Davit, P.; Martra, G.; Coluccia, S.; Augugliaro, V.; Lopez, E.G.; Loddo, V.; Marci, G.; Palmisano, L.; Schiavello, M. Adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of acetonitrile: FT-IR investigation. J. Mol. Catal. A 2003, 204, 693–701. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, S.; Choi, W. Dual photocatalytic pathways of trichloroacetate degradation on TiO2: Effects of nanosized platinum deposits on kinetics and mechanism. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 13311–13317. [Google Scholar]
- Luan, J.F.; Ma, K.; Wang, S.; Hu, Z.T.; Li, Y.M.; Pan, B.C. Research on Photocatalytic Degradation Pathway and Degradation Mechanisms of Organics. Curr. Org. Chem 2010, 14, 645–682. [Google Scholar]
- Chatterjee, D.; Mahata, A. Visible light induced photodegradation of organic pollutants on dye adsorbed TiO2 surface. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2002, 153, 199–204. [Google Scholar]
- Fabbri, D.; Prevot, A.B.; Zelano, V.; Ginepro, M.; Pramauro, E. Removal and degradation of aromatic compounds from a highly polluted site by coupling soil washing with photocatalysis. Chemosphere 2008, 71, 59–65. [Google Scholar]
- Sohrabi, M.R.; Ghavami, M. Comparison of Direct Yellow 12 dye degradation efficiency using UV/semiconductor and UV/H(2)O(2)/semiconductor systems. Desalination 2010, 252, 157–162. [Google Scholar]
- Franch, M.I.; Peral, J.; Domenech, X.; Howe, R.F.; Ayllon, J.A. Enhancement of photocatalytic activity of TiO2 by adsorbed aluminium(III). Appl. Catal. B 2005, 55, 105–113. [Google Scholar]
- Yamashita, H.; Nose, H.; Kuwahara, Y.; Nishida, Y.; Yuan, S.; Mori, K. TiO2 photocatalyst loaded on hydrophobic Si3N4 support for efficient degradation of organics diluted in water. Appl. Catal. A 2008, 350, 164–168. [Google Scholar]
- Neppolian, B.; Yamashita, H.; Okada, Y.; Nishijima, H.; Anpo, M. Preparation of unique TiO2 nano-particle photocatalysts by a multi-gelation method for control of the physicochemical parameters and reactivity. Catal. Lett 2005, 105, 111–117. [Google Scholar]
- An, H.Q.; Zhou, J.; Li, J.X.; Zhu, B.L.; Wang, S.R.; Zhang, S.M.; Wu, S.H.; Huang, W.P. Deposition of Pt on the stable nanotubular TiO2 and its photocatalytic performance. Catal. Commun 2009, 11, 175–179. [Google Scholar]
- Davit, P.; Martra, G.; Coluccia, S. Photocatalytic degradation of organic compounds on TiO2 powders: FT-IR investigation of surface reactivity and mechanistic aspects. J. Jpn. Pet. Inst 2004, 47, 359–376. [Google Scholar]
- Cernigoj, U.; Stangar, U.L.; Trebse, P. Degradation of neonicotinoid insecticides by different advanced oxidation processes and studying the effect of ozone on TiO2 photocatalysis. Appl. Catal. B 2007, 75, 229–238. [Google Scholar]
- Sohrabi, M.R.; Ghavami, M. Photocatalytic degradation of Direct Red 23 dye using UV/TiO2: Effect of operational parameters. J. Hazard. Mater 2008, 153, 1235–1239. [Google Scholar]
- Franch, M.I.; Peral, J.; Domenech, X.; Ayllon, J.A. Aluminium(III) adsorption: A soft and simple method to prevent TiO2 deactivation during salicylic acid photodegradation. Chem. Commun 2005, 14, 1851–1853. [Google Scholar]
- Hammami, S.; Bellakhal, N.; Oturan, N.; Oturan, M.A.; Dachraoui, M. Degradation of Acid Orange 7 by electrochemically generated (OH)-O-center dot radicals in acidic aqueous medium using a boron-doped diamond or platinum anode: A mechanistic study. Chemosphere 2008, 73, 678–684. [Google Scholar]
- Luan, J.F.; Pan, B.C.; Paz, Y.; Li, Y.M.; Wu, X.S.; Zou, Z.G. Structural, photophysical and photocatalytic properties of new Bi2SbVO7 under visible light irradiation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys 2009, 11, 6289–6298. [Google Scholar]
- Arana, J.; Rendon, E.T.; Rodriguez, J.M.D.; Melian, J.A.H.; Diaz, O.G.; Pena, J.P. FTIR study of the photocatalytic degradation of NH4+ determination wastes. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2002, 148, 215–222. [Google Scholar]
- Arana, J.; Nieto, J.L.M.; Melian, J.A.H.; Rodriguez, J.M.D.; Diaz, O.G.; Pena, J.P.; Bergasa, O.; Alvarez, C.; Mendez, J. Photocatalytic degradation of formaldehyde containing wastewater from veterinarian laboratories. Chemosphere 2004, 55, 893–904. [Google Scholar]
- Vijayabalan, A.; Selvam, K.; Velmurugan, R.; Swaminathan, M. Photocatalytic activity of surface fluorinated TiO2-P25 in the degradation of Reactive Orange 4. J. Hazard. Mater 2009, 172, 914–921. [Google Scholar]
- Arana, J.; Rodriguez, J.M.D.; Diaz, O.G.; Melian, J.A.H.; Pena, J.P. Comparative study on the photocatalytic mineralization of homologous aliphatic acids and alcohols. Appl. Surface Sci 2006, 252, 8193–8202. [Google Scholar]
- Eslami, A.; Nasseri, S.; Yadollahi, B.; Mesdaghinia, A.; Vaezi, F.; Nabizadeh, R.; Nazmara, S. Photocatalytic degradation of methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) in contaminated water by ZnO nanoparticles. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol 2008, 83, 1447–1453. [Google Scholar]
- Arana, J.; Cabo, C.G.I.; Rodriguez, C.F.; Melian, J.A.H.; Mendez, J.A.O.; Rodriguez, J.M.D.; Pena, J.P. Combining TiO2-photocatalysis and wetland reactors for the efficient treatment of pesticides. Chemosphere 2008, 71, 788–794. [Google Scholar]
- Li, J.P.; Zhang, X.; Ai, Z.H.; Jia, F.L.; Zhang, L.Z.; Lin, J. Efficient visible light degradation of rhodamine B by a photo-electrochemical process based on a Bi2WO6 nanoplate film electrode. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 6832–6836. [Google Scholar]
- Li, X.; Ye, J.H. Photocatalytic degradation of rhodamine B over Pb3Nb4O13/fumed SiO2 composite under visible light irradiation. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 13109–13116. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, J.M. Photodegradation of rhodamine B in water assisted by titania nanorod thin films subjected to various thermal treatments. Environ. Sci. Technol 2007, 41, 1723–1728. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, J.M.; Zhang, T.W. Photodegradation of rhodamine B in water assisted by titania films prepared through a novel procedure. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2004, 162, 171–177. [Google Scholar]
- Li, J.Q.; Li, L.P.; Zheng, L.; Xian, Y.Z.; Jin, L.T. Photoelectrocatalytic degradation of rhodamine B using Ti/TiO2 electrode prepared by laser calcination method. Electrochim. Acta 2006, 51, 4942–4949. [Google Scholar]
- Qu, P.; Zhao, J.C.; Shen, T.; Hidaka, H. TiO2-assisted photodegradation of dyes: A study of two competitive primary processes in the degradation of RB in an aqueous TiO2 colloidal solution. J. Mol. Catal. A 1998, 129, 257–268. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, J.C.; Wu, T.X.; Wu, K.Q.; Oikawa, K.; Hidaka, H.; Serpone, N. Photoassisted degradation of dye pollutants. 3. Degradation of the cationic dye rhodamine B in aqueous anionic surfactant/TiO2 dispersions under visible light irradiation: Evidence for the need of substrate adsorption on TiO2 particles. Environ. Sci. Technol 1998, 32, 2394–2400. [Google Scholar]
- Luan, J.F.; Ma, K.; Zhang, L.Y.; Li, M.; Li, Y.M.; Pan, B.C. Research on Different Preparation Methods of New Photocatalysts. Curr. Org. Chem 2010, 14, 683–698. [Google Scholar]
- Kitano, M.; Takeuchi, M.; Matsuoka, M.; Thomas, J.M.; Anpo, M. Preparation of visible light-responsive TiO2 thin film photocatalysts by an RF magnetron sputtering deposition method and their photocatalytic reactivity. Chem. Lett 2005, 34, 616–617. [Google Scholar]
- Anpo, M.; Yamashita, H.; Ikeue, K.; Fujii, Y.; Zhang, S.G.; Ichihashi, Y.; Park, D.R.; Suzuki, Y.; Koyano, K.; Tatsumi, T. Photocatalytic reduction of CO2 with H2O on Ti-MCM-41 and Ti-MCM-48 mesoporous zeolite catalysts. Catal. Today 1998, 44, 327–332. [Google Scholar]
- Anpo, M.; Takeuchi, M. The design and development of highly reactive titanium oxide photocatalysts operating under visible light irradiation. J. Catal 2003, 216, 505–516. [Google Scholar]
- Hamadanian, M.; Reisi-Vanani, A.; Majedi, A. Preparation and characterization of S-doped TiO2 nanoparticles, effect of calcination temperature and evaluation of photocatalytic activity. Mater. Chem. Phys 2009, 116, 376–382. [Google Scholar]
- Luan, J.F.; Zhao, W.; Feng, J.W.; Cai, H.L.; Zheng, Z.; Pan, B.C.; Wu, X.S.; Zou, Z.G.; Li, Y.M. Structural, photophysical and photocatalytic properties of novel Bi2AlVO7. J. Hazard. Mater 2009, 164, 781–789. [Google Scholar]
- Izumi, F. A software package for the Rietveld analysis of X-ray and neutron diffraction patterns. J. Crystallogr. Assoc. Jpn 1985, 27, 23–26. [Google Scholar]
- Zou, Z.; Ye, J.; Arakawa, H. Preparation, structural and photophysical properties of Bi2InNbO7 compound. J. Mater. Sci. Lett 2000, 19, 1909–1911. [Google Scholar]
- Tauc, J.; Grigorov, R.; Vancu, A. Optical properties and electronic structure of amorphous germanium. Phys. Status Solidi 1966, 15, 627–637. [Google Scholar]
- Butler, M.A. Photoelectrolysis and physical-properties of semiconducting electrode WO3. J. Appl. Phys 1977, 48, 1914–1920. [Google Scholar]
- Horikoshi, S.; Saitou, A.; Hidaka, H.; Serpone, N. Environmental remediation by an integrated microwave/UV illumination method. V. Thermal and nonthermal effects of microwave radiation on the photocatalyst and on the photodegradation of rhodamine-b under UV/Vis radiation. Environ. Sci. Technol 2003, 37, 5813–5822. [Google Scholar]
- Li, G.R.; Qu, D.L.; Arurault, L.; Tong, Y.X. Hierarchically Porous Gd3+-Doped CeO2 Nanostructures for the Remarkable Enhancement of Optical and Magnetic Properties. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 1235–1241. [Google Scholar]
- Selvan, R.K.; Gedanken, A.; Anilkumar, P.; Manikandan, G.; Karunakaran, C. Synthesis and Characterization of Rare Earth Orthovanadate (RVO4; R = La, Ce, Nd, Sm, Eu & Gd) Nanorods/Nanocrystals/Nanospindles by a Facile Sonochemical Method and Their Catalytic Properties. J. Cluster Sci 2009, 20, 291–305. [Google Scholar]
- Perles, J.; Fortes-Revilla, C.; Gutierrez-Puebla, E.; Iglesias, M.; Monge, M.A.; Ruiz-Valero, C.; Snejko, N. Synthesis, structure and catalytic properties of rare-earth ternary sulfates. Chem. Mater 2005, 17, 2701–2706. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, W.; Su, C.; Ran, R.; Shao, Z.P. A new Gd-promoted nickel catalyst for methane conversion to syngas and as an anode functional layer in a solid oxide fuel cell. J. Power Sources 2011, 196, 3855–3862. [Google Scholar]
- Nasr, C.; Vinodgopal, K.; Fisher, L.; Hotchandani, S.; Chattopadhyay, A.K.; Kamat, P.V. Environmental photochemistry on semiconductor surfaces. Visible light induced degradation of a textile diazo dye, naphthol blue black, on TiO2 nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem 1996, 100, 8436–8442. [Google Scholar]
- Wiegel, M.; Middel, W.; Blasse, G. Influence of NS2 ions on the luminescence of niobates and tantalates. J. Mater. Chem 1995, 5, 981–983. [Google Scholar]
- Li, N.; Xiao, H.Y.; Zu, X.T.; Wang, L.M.; Ewing, R.C.; Lian, J.; Gao, F. First-principles study of electronic properties of La2Hf2O7 and Gd2Hf2O7. J. Appl. Phys. 2007, 102, 063704:1–063704:6. [Google Scholar]
- Luan, J.F.; Zhang, L.Y.; Ma, K.; Li, Y.M.; Zou, Z.G. Preparation and property characterization of new Y2FeSbO7 and In2FeSbO7 photocatalysts. Solid State Sci 2011, 13, 185–194. [Google Scholar]
- Charifi, Z.; Reshak, A.H.; Baaziz, H. Phase transition of LaX (X = P, As, Sb and Bi) at high pressure: Theoretical investigation of the structural and electronic properties. Solid State Commun 2008, 148, 139–144. [Google Scholar]
- Vajenine, G.V.; Hoffmann, R.; zurLoye, H.C. The electronic structures and magnetic properties of one-dimensional ABO6 chains in Sr3ABO6 (A = Co,Ni; B = Pt,Ir) and two-dimensional MO3 sheets in InMO3 (M = Fe,Mn). Chem. Phys 1996, 204, 469–478. [Google Scholar]
- Luo, H.Z.; Zhu, Z.Y.; Liu, G.D.; Xu, S.F.; Wu, G.H.; Liu, H.Y.; Qu, J.P.; Li, Y.X. Ab-initio investigation of electronic properties magnetism of half-Heusler alloys XCrAl (X = Fe, Co, Ni) and NiCrZ (Z = Al, Ga, In). Phys. B Condens. Matter 2008, 403, 200–206. [Google Scholar]
- Xiang, H.P.; Wu, Z.J.; Meng, J. Theoretical investigation on the magnetic and electronic properties of Sr2BMoO6 (B = Fe, Co). Phys. Status Solidi B 2005, 242, 1414–1421. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, A.; Liu, L.S.; Shu, C.C.; Zhai, P.C.; Zhao, W.Y.; Zhang, Q.J. Electronic Structures and Transport Properties of RFe4Sb12 (R = Na, Ca, Nd, Yb, Sn, In). J. Electron. Mater 2011, 40, 974–979. [Google Scholar]
- Oshikiri, M.; Boero, M.; Ye, J.H.; Zou, Z.G.; Kido, G. Electronic structures of promising photocatalysts InMO4 (M = V, Nb, Ta) and BiVO4 for water decomposition in the visible wavelength region. J. Chem. Phys 2002, 117, 7313–7318. [Google Scholar]
- Marugan, J.; Hufschmidt, D.; Sagawe, G.; Selzer, V.; Bahnemann, D. Optical density and photonic efficiency of silica-supported TiO2 photocatalysts. Water Res 2006, 40, 833–839. [Google Scholar]
|Table 1. Structural parameters of Gd2FeSbO7 prepared by the solid state reaction method.|
|Table 2. Structural parameters of Gd2InSbO7 prepared by the solid state reaction method.|
|Table 3. Binding energies (BE) for key elements.|
© 2013 by the authors; licensee Molecular Diversity Preservation International, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).