Next Article in Journal
Increasing the X-ray Diffraction Power of Protein Crystals by Dehydration: The Case of Bovine Serum Albumin and a Survey of Literature Data
Next Article in Special Issue
Genetic Diversity of the Endemic and Medicinally Important Plant Rheum officinale as Revealed by Inter-Simpe Sequence Repeat (ISSR) Markers
Previous Article in Journal
Production of Protocatechuic Acid in Bacillus Thuringiensis ATCC33679
Previous Article in Special Issue
Expression Analysis of Four Peroxiredoxin Genes from Tamarix hispida in Response to Different Abiotic Stresses and Exogenous Abscisic Acid (ABA)

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13(3), 3773-3781; doi:10.3390/ijms13033773

Review
Recent Advances of Flowering Locus T Gene in Higher Plants
Feng Xu 1,2, Xiaofeng Rong 2, Xiaohua Huang 2 and Shuiyuan Cheng 1,*
1
Hubei Key Laboratory of Economic Forest Germplasm Improvement and Resources Comprehensive Utilization, Huanggang Normal University, Huanggang, Hubei 438000, China; E-Mail: xufeng198@126.com
2
College of Horticulture and Gardening, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei 434025, China; E-Mails: rongxf@sina.cn (X.R.); huangxiaohua87820@163.com (X.H.)
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: s_y_cheng@sina.com; Tel.: +86-713-8833599; Fax: +86-716-8621626.
Received: 25 January 2012; in revised form: 9 March 2012 / Accepted: 13 March 2012 /
Published: 21 March 2012

Abstract

: Flowering Locus T (FT) can promote flowering in the plant photoperiod pathway and also facilitates vernalization flowering pathways and other ways to promote flowering. The expression of products of the FT gene is recognized as important parts of the flowering hormone and can induce flowering by long-distance transportation. In the present study, many FT-like genes were isolated, and the transgenic results show that FT gene can promote flowering in plants. This paper reviews the progress of the FT gene and its expression products to provide meaningful information for further studies of the functions of FT genes.
Keywords:
flowering hormone; FT homologous genes; expression of products

1. Introduction

Scientists have studied the flowering of higher plants for nearly a hundred years. The flowering process is extremely complex. Many studies have shown that the floral development process in plants is controlled not only by the complex regulation of multiple genes in internal factors, but also by a variety of environmental factors [1]. In recent years, the Flowering Locus T (FT) gene has been the most widely studied and effective gene in promoting early flowering in plants [24]. In addition, its homologous genes PtFT1, CiFT, Hd3a, and SFT have been isolated from poplar, citrus, rice, and tomato, respectively, and the overexpression of these genes can promote early flowering in transgenic plants [58]. The FT gene and its homologous genes are found in a variety of plants and therefore play similarly important roles; many studies have shown the protein encoded by the FT gene may be the major component of the “flowering hormone” [9,10]. In the present paper, some functions of the FT gene and research progress of the FT protein are briefly reviewed to further shed light on the function of FT genes and their products.

2. Flowering Hormone

The first researcher to study the flowering mechanism was Julis Sachs, who proposed the concept of the flowering material in 1865 following the flowering induction experiment [11]. He used a variety of related experiments to show that the floral promoting factor was first produced in leaves then transported over a long distance through the stem to produce buds that promote flowering. Chailakhyan first proposed the concept of the flowering hormone in 1936 and named this flowering-promoting material [12]. Experimental evidence confirmed that the flowering hormone as a common element in a variety of flowering plants. Such data have greatly stimulated research interest to identify the flowering hormone, but no result has been observed. Huang et al. [13] demonstrated the flowering hormone might be associated with the FT mRNA. This finding brought the attention of many scientists to the FT gene and its products. However, Corbesier et al. [14] subsequently suggested the FT mRNA is not a flowering hormone but an intermediate product, while the real flowering hormone should be the end product FT protein. This claim was proven by two experiments. First, FT protein was confirmed to promote flowering through long-distance transport, as observed using FT protein fused to green fluorescent protein (GFP). Second, grafting experiments of Arabidopsis mutants also proved that the FT protein could be transported over long distances and could ultimately promote flowering. In the course of the experiment, FT mRNA transport was not detected, indicating that the FT protein may be the major component of the flower hormone. Under a long-day photoperiod, the FT protein of Arabidopsis moves from leaves to the top and eventually interacts with Flowering Locus D (FD). The FT-FD complex formed directly or indirectly activates the flower-type genes, such as APETALA1 (AP1) genes and ultimately promotes flowering in Arabidopsis [15,16]. The FT protein is part of the phloem transfer signal, which has been proven in the FT protein homologue in the phloem sap of rice, gourds, and Brassica [1719]. Subsequently, a number of related studies proved that during the FT-mediated flowering process, the floral-promoting signal, which can be transferred from leaves to the apical meristem, is mainly composed of the FT protein [7,2023].

3. Flower-Promoting Material FT

3.1. Flowering Pathway and Basic Functions of FT Genes

The FT gene was isolated as early as 1999, but only in more recent years have researchers been able to build a certain understanding about its regulatory networks and its homologous gene [9,24]. For example, in Arabidopsis, FT gene regulation first receives the signal from the photoperiod regulatory center gene CONSTANS (CO) under long-day conditions to modulate flowering. The CO transcription factor could interact with the promoter of FT gene [25]. Second, the integration of flower-induced signals by the FT gene from the photoperiod, autonomous, and vernalization pathways is promoted through the flowering integration gene Suppressor of Overexpression Constans 1 (SOC1) and Leafy (LFY), which ultimately promote Arabidopsis flowering [26]. Therefore, the FT gene should be the final signaling target gene of the light cycle. The early flowering characteristic of transgenic plants with CO gene overexpression could be eliminated by FT gene mutations, whereas transgenic plants with FT gene overexpression exhibited early flowering in both short-day and long-day conditions [27]. Normally, CO and FT are expressed exclusively in vascular bundles, whereas GIGANTEA (GI) is expressed in various tissues. Interestingly, GI expressed in mesophyll or vascular tissues increases FT expression without up-regulating CO expression under short-day (SD) conditions. For example, ectopic expression test of GI demonstrated that GI could activate FT expression in a CO-independent manner under SD conditions through binding and weakening several FT repressors, such as SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE (SVP), TEMPRANILLO (TEM)1, and TEM2 [28].

The FT gene can not only promote early flowering in plants, but also regulate developmental changes of seeds, pods, and other parts. Arabidopsis belongs to long-day plants. If suddenly placed in a short-day environment, the growth of plants may change minimally, but FT levels would be significantly reduced [16]. FT homologous genes in poplar control the development termination in short-day, dormancy initiation during vernalization, differentiation of buds, and other developmental processes [8]. In Norway Spruce, FT homologous genes regulate flower bud differentiation, formation of floral structures, and other transition processes, suggesting FT functions behave in a very conservative manner among the gymnosperms [29].

In addition to regulation by the photoperiod pathway, FT is also regulated by environmental temperature. At low temperature, low temperature signal in Arabidopsis is adjusted by the vernalization pathway and induces the development process by reducing the level of Flowering Locus C (FLC), which controls FT expression upstream [3033]. On the other hand, temperature elevation leads to changes in the “ambient temperature transcriptome,” which are accompanied by an elevation in auxin levels, increased abundance/activity of Phytochromeinteracting Factor 4 (PIF4), and enhanced expression of FT [34]. Therefore, the photoperiod and temperature can independently regulate expression of FT.

3.2. FT Homologous Genes and Signal Transfer

The discovery of the FT gene function raises interest to study FT genes in different plants. The role of FT homologous genes has been extensively studied in heterologous and homologous plant systems. FT genes have been isolated from many plants, including crop plants, like Oryza sativa [5] and Hordeum vulgare [35]; fruit plants, like Vitis vinifera [36], Malus domestica [37], and Pyrus communis [38]; vegetable plants, like Solanum lycopersicum [7], Cucurbita maxima [19], Solanum tuberosum [39], Pisum sativum [40], and Beta vulgaris [41]; ornamental plants, like Ipomoea nil [42], Chenopodium rubrum [43], Oncidium luridum [44], and Helianthus annuus [45]. Overexpression of FT homologous genes in tomato, poplar, pear, and sunflower can promote early flowering, indicating the conserved function of FT homologous genes [7,46,47]. The FT gene belongs to a small gene family of floral regulators. In rice, 13 FT-like members was found. One of them, designated RFT1, lies adjacent to Hd3a, and its presumed amino acid sequence shows 91% identity with that of Hd3a [5]. Three members of FT were also found in barley [35]. Barley has an adaptive mechanism that adjusts flowering according to photoperiodic changes using a combination of different FT-like genes [48]. In addition, transcripts of FT homologous genes in grapes and maize have been shown to increase before flowering induction [33,49]. Xi and Yu [50] suggested that, in contrast to Arabidopsis and other plants, whose FT and other flowering genes are mainly expressed in the vascular tissues of leaves, FT homologous genes in most soybeans are highly expressed in the petiole during the flowering period. Thus, petioles may play an important role in the flowering regulation of soybeans and other plants, and may be the target organs of some flowering genes in soybean.

The FT signal can be transferred by grafting. Overexpression of the tomato FT homologous gene, Single Flower Truss (SFT), in tomato and tobacco, promotes early flowering. When the transgenic plant with constitutively expressed SFT is used as a scion to graft onto the rootstock of the sft mutant, SFT protein can induce early flowering of sft. However, when the sft mutant is used as a scion to graft onto the wild-type rootstock, it could not promote flowering, indicating a different SFT expression level, resulting in different outcomes [21]. Lin et al. [19] used different hops as rootstock and scion to detect FT protein transfer and extract the FT protein. Zhang [46] used transgenic plants as rootstock and non-transgenic plants as scion to perform a preliminary study on the grafting transfer of the FT signal. The results showed that the split-connection grafting method could not lead to early flowering of the non-transgenic scion, but after grafting, the flowering rate by heat-shock induction in transgenic rootstock significantly decreased, compared with that before grafting, indicating the FT signal in rootstock partially transferred after grafting. These studies showed FT must be transported over a long distance to the top to ultimately promote flowering.

4. FT Expression Product

FT expression products include FT mRNA and FT protein. In 2005, FT mRNA was considered the flowering hormone or its important component. This concept was later disproved, because previous experiments could not be repeated, and in later grafting experiments, FT protein, instead of FT mRNA, was finally detected. FT protein is a class of the CETS family, with a molecular weight of approximately 20 kDa [51]. This protein has a similar sequence and protein-folding structure to mammalian Raf Kinase Inhibitor Protein, and is homologous to the Phosphatidylethanolamine Binding Protein protein [52].

Lin et al. in 2007 [19] used Zucchini yellow mosaic virus-mediated transient expression of Arabidopsis in short-day pumpkin to illustrate the conservation of the FT protein [19]. The presence of the FT protein was also reported in rape [18]. The FT protein can be transported from the phloem to the top to induce flowering [19]. The rice FT homologue Hd3a was found in the inner region of the SAM and in stem and leaf blade vascular tissues, suggesting that it is produced in the vascular tissue of the leaf blade, transported through stem phloem tissue, unloaded at the upper end of the vascular tissue, and translocated to the SAM, probably through the region just beneath the SAM. These results suggest that the Hd3a protein, but not Hd3a mRNA, is a candidate for the florigen in rice [23]. Furthermore, Hd3a interacts with 14-3-3 proteins in the apical cells of shoots, yielding a complex that translocates to the nucleus and binds to the Oryza sativa FD1 transcription factor, a rice homologue of Arabidopsis thaliana FD. The resultant ternary “florigen activation complex” (FAC) induces transcription of OsMADS15, a homologue of AtAPETALA1 (AP1), which leads to flowering. Taoka et al. in 2011 [53] have determined the 2.4 Å crystal structure of rice FAC, which provides a mechanistic basis for florigen function in flowering. The results indicated that 14-3-3 proteins act as intracellular receptors for florigen in shoot apical cells, and offer new approaches to manipulate flowering in various crops and trees. By these successful experiments, the FT protein is seen to have the features of most flowering hormones. It is conservative and can be transported over a long distance to the apical meristem. The FT protein can be detected in repetitions of the same experiment and experiments with different materials, but the FT protein cannot be concluded to be the flowering hormone. Liu et al. in 2008 [54] used a turnip mosaic virus with deletion of Coat Protein (CP) (TCVΔCP) as the vector, cloned FT and mFT (start codon was mutated into stop codon) sequences into the location of the original CP sequence transformed into Arabidopsis, and detected their sequences in unvaccinated upper new leaves and buds to investigate whether FT mRNA has a role in transferring important signals during plant growth and development. In contrast, the GFP sequence, which was added as a control variable, was not detected in the same area. These results showed that FT and mFT sequences are able to restore the intercellular mobility of TCVΔCP.

5. Prospects

Flower development is an important decision of higher plants and is regulated by a variety of flowering genes. The FT gene mainly affects the induction of flowering. Studies have identified its homologous genes in a variety of garden plants, fruit trees, and vegetables. Transgenic technology confirmed that the gene can promote early flowering in plants. Thus, the genetic engineering approach can be used to perform genetic reformation on the flowering genes in wood, such as ginkgo, to shorten their young period.

FT genes are conserved among different species. Although the FT gene and its expression products are somewhat understood, many issues still need to be further studied. One issue is the difference in expression and functions of FT genes between gymnosperms and angiosperms, between annual and perennial plants, and between different parts of the same plant, and how its expression is regulated. Although FT mRNA is not detected during the transfer process, whether it is unrelated to the flowering hormone is another issue to be considered. Moreover, it need to be ascertained whether the reasons that the FT protein has not been detected for a long time are its special structure or low content, the type of FT gene promoter, and how it is regulated. Likewise, more topics of concern are whether the present FT signal graft transfer is of high practical value, and what the transport mechanism and distribution pattern during FT grafting are. Answers to these questions are not clear now, and many related minor issues have also arisen. When these issues are satisfactorily resolved, the concept of the “flowering hormone” and the FT gene and its expression product will be better understood. The resolution will also be a guide to control the flowering of fruit trees, flowers, and vegetables.

Acknowledgments

The present work was supported by the Key Project of Chinese Ministry of Education (No. 210137), the Science Fund of Excellent Young Talents of Hubei Educational Office (No.Q20091201), and the Open Fund of Hubei Key Laboratory of Economic Forest Germplasm Improvement and Resources Comprehensive Utilization (No. 20011BLKF240).

References

  1. Tan, F.C.; Swain, S.M. Genetics of flower initiation and development in annual and perennial plants. Physiol. Plant 2006, 128, 8–17. [Google Scholar]
  2. Mouradov, A.; Cremer, F.; Coupland, G. Control of flowering time: Interacting pathways as a basis for diversity. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 111–130. [Google Scholar]
  3. Komed, Y. Genetic regulation of time to flower in Arabidopsis thaliana. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol 2004, 55, 521–535. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lemmetyinen, J.; Hassinen, M.; Elo, A. Functional characterization of SEPALLATA3 and agamous orthologues in silver birch. Physiol. Plant 2004, 121, 149–162. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kojima, S.; Takahashi, Y.; Kobayashi, Y.; Monna, L.; Sasaki, T.; Araki, T.; Yano, M. Hd3a, a rice ortholog of the Arabidopsis FT gene, promotes transition to flowering downstream of Hd1 under short-day conditions. Plant Cell Physiol 2002, 43, 1096–1105. [Google Scholar]
  6. Endo, T.; Shimada, T.; Fujii, H.; Kobayashi, Y.; Araki, T.; Omura, M. Ectopic expression of an FT homolog from citrus confers an early fowering phenotype on trifoliate orange (Poncirus trifoliata L. Raf.). Transgenic Res 2005, 14, 703–712. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lifschitz, E.; Eviatar, T.; Rozman, A.; Shalit, A.; Goldshmidt, A.; Amsellem, Z.; Alvarez, J.P.; Eshed, Y. The tomato FT ortholog triggers systemic signals that regulate growth and flowering and substitute for diverse environmental stimuli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 6398–6403. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bohleninus, H.; Huang, T.; Charbonnel-Campaa, L.; Brunner, A.M.; Jansson, S.; Strauss, S.H.; Nilsson, O. CO/FT regulatory module controls timing of flowering and seasonal growth cessation in trees. Science 2006, 312, 1040–1043. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kobayashi, Y.; Weigel, D. Move on up, it’s time for change mobile signals controlling photoperiod dependent flowering. Genes Dev 2007, 21, 2371–2384. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zeevaart, J.A.D. Leaf produced floral signals. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol 2008, 11, 541–547. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sachs, J. Wirkung des lichtes auf die blütenbilding unter vermittlung der laubblätter. Bot. Ztg 1865, 23. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chailakhyan, M.K. New facts in support of the hormonal theory of plant development. C. R. Acad. Sci. URSS 1936, 13, 79–83. [Google Scholar]
  13. Huang, T.; Bohlenius, H.; Eriksson, S. The mRNA of the Arabidopsis gene FT moves from leaf to shoot apex and induces flowering. Science 2005, 309, 1694–1696. [Google Scholar]
  14. Corbesier, L.; Vincent, C.; Jang, S. FT protein movement contributes to long-distance signaling in floral induction of Arabidopsis. Science 2007, 316, 1030–1033. [Google Scholar]
  15. Abe, M.; Kobayashi, Y.; Yamamoto, S.; Daimon, Y.; Yamaguchi, A.; Ikeda, Y.; Ichinoki, H.; Notaguchi, M.; Goto, K.; Araki, T. FD, a bZIP protein mediating signals from the floral pathway integrator FT at the shoot apex. Science 2005, 309, 1052–1056. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wigge, P.A.; Kim, M.C.; Jaeger, K.E.; Busch, W.; Schmid, M.; Lohmann, J.U.; Weigel, D. Integration of spatial and temporal information during floral induction in Arabidopsis. Science 2005, 309, 1056–1059. [Google Scholar]
  17. Aki, T.; Shigyo, M.; Nakano, R. Nanoscale proteomics revealed the presence of regulatory proteins including three FT-Like proteins in phloem and xylem saps from rice. Plant Cell Physiol 2008, 49, 767–790. [Google Scholar]
  18. Giavalisco, P.; Kapitza, K.; Kolasa, A. Towards the proteome of Brassica napus phloem sap. Proteomics 2006, 6, 896–909. [Google Scholar]
  19. Lin, M.; Belanger, H.; Lee, Y. Flowering Locus T protein may act as the long-distance florigenic signal in the Cucurbits. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 1488–1506. [Google Scholar]
  20. Turck, F.; Fornara, F.; Coupland, G. Regulation and identity of florigen: Flowering Locus T moves center stage. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol 2008, 59, 573–594. [Google Scholar]
  21. Mathieu, J.; Warthmann, N.; Kuttner, F. Export of FT protein from phloem companion cells is sufficient for floral induction in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol 2007, 17, 1055–1060. [Google Scholar]
  22. Jaeger, K; Wigge, P. FT protein acts as a long-range signal in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17, 1050–1054. [Google Scholar]
  23. Tamaki, S.; Matsuo, S.; Wong, H.L.; Yokoi, S.; Shimamoto, K. Hd3a protein is a mobile flowering signal in rice. Science 2007, 316, 1033–1036. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kardailsky, I.; Shukla, V.K.; Ahn, J.H.; Dagenais, N.; Christensen, S.K.; Nguyen, J.T.; Chory, J.; Harrison, M.J.; Weigel, D. Activation tagging of the floral inducer FT. Science 1999, 286, 1962–1965. [Google Scholar]
  25. Samaeh, A.; Onouehi, H.; Gold, S.E. Distinct roles of CONSTANS target genes in reproductive development of Arabidopsis. Science 2000, 88, 1613–1616. [Google Scholar]
  26. Yoo, S.K.; Chung, K.S.; Kim, J.; Lee, J.H.; Hong, S.M.; Yoo, S.J.; Yoo, S.Y.; Lee, J.S.; Ahn, J.H. CONSTANS activates Suppressor of Overexpression of Constans 1 through Flowering Locus T to promote flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2005, 139, 770–778. [Google Scholar]
  27. Lee, J.; Lee, I. Regulation and function of SOC1, a flowering pathway integrator. J. Exp. Bot 2010, 61, 2247–2254. [Google Scholar]
  28. Sawa, M.; Kay, S.A. GIGANTEA directly activates Flowering Locus T in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 11698–11703. [Google Scholar]
  29. Gyllenstrand, N.; Clapham, D.; Kallman, T.; Lagercrantz, U. A Norway spruce Flowering Locus T homolog is implicated in control of growth rhythm in conifers. Plant Physiol 2007, 144, 248–257. [Google Scholar]
  30. Bastow, R.J.S.; Mylne, C.; Lister, Z. Vernalization requires epigenetic silencing of FLC by histone methylation. Nature 2004, 427, 164–167. [Google Scholar]
  31. Michaels, S.D; Amasino, R.M. Loss of Flowering Locus C activity eliminates the late-flowering phenotype of FRIGIDA and autonomous pathway mutations but not responsiveness to vernalization. Plant Cell 2001, 13, 935–941. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sheldon, C.C.; Conn, A.B.; Dennis, E.S. Different regulatory regions are required for the vernalization induced repression of Flowering Locus C and for the epigenetic maintenance of repression. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 2527–2537. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kumar, S.V.; Wigge, P.A. H2A. Z-Containing nucleosomes mediate the thermosensory response in Arabidopsis. Cell 2010, 140, 136–147. [Google Scholar]
  34. Frankliin, K.A.; Lee, S.H.; Patel, D.; Kumar, S.V.; Spartz, A.K.; Gu, C.; Ye, S.; Yu, P.; Breen, G.; Cohen, J.D.; et al. Phytochrome-intreacting factor 4 (PIF4) regulates auxin biosynthesis at high temperature. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 20231–20235. [Google Scholar]
  35. Faure, S.; Higgins, J.; Turner, A.; Laurie, D.A. The Flowering Locus T-like gene family in Barley (Hordeum vulgare). Genetics 2007, 176, 599–609. [Google Scholar]
  36. Carmona, M.J.; Calonje, M.; Martinez-Zapater, J.M. The FT/TFL1 gene family in grapevine. Plant Mol. Biol 2007, 63, 637–650. [Google Scholar]
  37. Kotoda, N.; Hayashi, H.; Suzuki, M.; Igarashi, M.; Hatsuyama, Y.; Kidou, S.; Igasaki, T.; Nishiguchi, M.; Yano, K.; Shimizu, T.; et al. Molecular characterization of Flowering Locus T-Like genes of apple (Malus domestica Borkh.). Plant Cell Physiol 2010, 51, 561–575. [Google Scholar]
  38. Matsuda, N.; Ikeda, K.; Kurosaka, M.; Takashina, T.; Isuzugawa, K.; Endo, T.; Omura, M. Early flowering phenotype in transgenic pears (Pyrus communis L.) expressing the CiFT gene. J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci 2009, 78, 410–416. [Google Scholar]
  39. Navarro, C.; Abelenda, J.A.; Cruz-Oró, E.; Cuéllar, C.A.; Tamaki, S.; Silva, J.; Shimamoto, K.; Prat, S. Control of flowering and storage organ formation in potato by Flowering Locus T. Nature 2011, 10, 119–123. [Google Scholar]
  40. Hecht, V.; Laurie, R.E.; Vander Schoor, J.K.; Ridge, S.; Knowles, C.L.; Liew, L.C.; Sussmilch, F.C.; Murfet, I.C.; Macknight, R.C.; Weller, J.L. The pea GIGAS gene is a Flowering Locus T homolog necessary for graft-transmissible specification of flowering but not for responsiveness to photoperiod. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 147–161. [Google Scholar]
  41. Pin, P.A.; Benlloch, R.; Bonnet, D.; Wremerth-Weich, E.; Kraft, T.; Gielen, J.J.L.; Nilsson, O. An antagonistic pair of FT homologs mediates the control flowering time in sugar beet. Science 2010, 330, 1397–1400. [Google Scholar]
  42. Hayama, R.; Agashe, B.; Luley, E.; King, R.; Coupland, G. A circadian rhythm set by dusk determines the expression of FT homologs and the short-day photoperiodic flowering response in Pharbitis. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 2988–3000. [Google Scholar]
  43. Cháb, D.; Kolar, J.; Olson, M.S.; Storchova, H. Two Flowering Locus T (FT) homologs in chenopodium rubrum differ in expression patterns. Planta 2008, 228, 929–940. [Google Scholar]
  44. Hou, C.J.; Yang, C.H. Functional analysis of FT and TFL1 orthologs from orchid (Oncidium gower ramsey) that regulate the vegetative to reproductive transition. Plant Cell Physiol 2009, 50, 1544–1557. [Google Scholar]
  45. Blackman, B.K.; Strasburg, J.L.; Raduski, A.R.; Michaels, S.D.; Rieseberg, L.H. The role of recently derived FT paralogs in sunflower domestication. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20, 629–635. [Google Scholar]
  46. Matsuda, N.; Ileda, K.; Kurosaka, M.; Takashina, T.; Isuzugawa, K.; Endo, T.; Omura, M. Early flowering phenotype in transgenic pears (Pyrus communis L.) expressing the CiFT gene. J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci 2009, 78, 410–416. [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhang, H.; Harry, D.E.; Ma, C.; Yuceer, C.; Hsu, C.Y.; Vikram, V.; Shevchenko, O.; Etherington, E.; Strauss, S.H. Precocious flowering in trees: the Flowering Locus T gene as a research and breeding tool in Populus. J. Exp. Bot 2010, 61, 2549–2560. [Google Scholar]
  48. Kikuchi, R.; Kawahigashi, H.; Oshima, M.; Andoand, T.; Handa, H. The differential expression of HvCO9, a member of the CONSTANS-like gene family, contributes to the control of flowering under short-day conditions in barley. J. Exp. Bot 2012, 63, 773–784. [Google Scholar]
  49. Danilevskaya, O.N.; Meng, X.; Hou, Z.; Ananiev, E.V.; Simmons, C.R. A genomic and expression compendium of the expanded PEBP gene family from maize. Plant Physiol 2008, 146, 250–264. [Google Scholar]
  50. Xi, W.; Yu, H. An expanding list: another flowering time gene, Flowering Locus T, regulates flower development. Plant Signal. Behav 2009, 4, 1142–1144. [Google Scholar]
  51. Pnueli, L.; Gutfinger, T.; Hareven, D.; Ben-Naim, O.; Ron, N.; Adir, N.; Lifshitz, E. Tomato SP interacting proteins define a conserved signaling system that regulates shoot architecture and flowering. Plant Cell 2001, 131, 2687–2702. [Google Scholar]
  52. Banfield, M.J.; Brady, R.L. The structure of Antirrhinum Centroradialis protein (CEN) suggests a role as a kinase regulator. Mol. Biol. Evol 2000, 297, 1159–1170. [Google Scholar]
  53. Taoka, K.; Ohki, I.; Tsuji, H.; Furuita, K.; Hayashi, K.; Yanase, T.; Yamaguchi, M.; Nakashima, C.; Purwestri, Y.A.; Tamaki, S.; et al. 14-3-3 proteins act as intracellular receptors for rice Hd3a florigen. Nature 2011, 476, 332–337. [Google Scholar]
  54. Liu, X.X.; Steve, J.; Li, C.Y. Research on moving ability and function of Arabidopsis Flowering Locus T. J. Northwest A & F Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2008, 36, 180–185. [Google Scholar]
Int. J. Mol. Sci. EISSN 1422-0067 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert