<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ijms</journal-id>
<journal-title>International Journal of Molecular Sciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title>Int. J. Mol. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1422-0067</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms11093600</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ijms-11-03600</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group>
<subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Model Free Approach for Non-Isothermal Decomposition of Un-Irradiated and γ-Irradiated Silver Acetate: New Route for Synthesis of Ag<sub>2</sub>O Nanoparticles</article-title></title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Siddiqui</surname><given-names>Mohmmed Rafiq H.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-ijms-11-03600">1</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Alshehri</surname><given-names>Saad</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-ijms-11-03600">1</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Warad</surname><given-names>Ismail Kh.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-ijms-11-03600">1</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Abd El-Salam</surname><given-names>Naser M.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af2-ijms-11-03600">2</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Mahfouz</surname><given-names>Refaat M.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-ijms-11-03600">1</xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c1-ijms-11-03600">*</xref></contrib></contrib-group>
<aff id="af1-ijms-11-03600">
<label>1</label> Department of Chemistry, College of Science, King Saud University, P. O. Box 2455, Riyadh-11451, Saudi Arabia; E-Mails: <email>rafiqs@ksu.edu.sa</email> (M.R.H.S.); <email>alshehri@ksu.edu.sa</email> (S.A.)</aff>
<aff id="af2-ijms-11-03600">
<label>2</label> Department of Natural Sciences, Riyadh Community College, King Saud University, P. O. Box 28095, Riyadh-11437, Saudi Arabia; E-Mail: <email>nelsalam@yahoo.com</email></aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c1-ijms-11-03600">*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: <email>rmhfouz@ksu.edu.sa</email>; Tel.: + 966 (1)-4675-981; Fax: +966 (1)-4675-992.</corresp></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2010</year></pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>27</day>
<month>9</month>
<year>2010</year></pub-date>
<volume>11</volume>
<issue>9</issue>
<fpage>3600</fpage>
<lpage>3609</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>5</day>
<month>8</month>
<year>2010</year></date>
<date date-type="rev-recd">
<day>26</day>
<month>8</month>
<year>2010</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>19</day>
<month>9</month>
<year>2010</year></date></history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>© 2010 by the authors; licensee Molecular Diversity Preservation International, Basel, Switzerland.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2010</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0">
<p>This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).</p></license></permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Kinetic studies for the non-isothermal decomposition of unirradiated and γ-irradiated silver acetate with 10<sup>3</sup> kGy total γ-ray doses were carried out in air. The results showed that the decomposition proceeds in one major step in the temperature range of (180–270 °C) with the formation of Ag<sub>2</sub>O as solid residue. The non-isothermal data for un-irradiated and γ-irradiated silver acetate were analyzed using Flynn-Wall-Ozawa (FWO) and nonlinear Vyazovkin (VYZ) iso-conversional methods. These free models on the investigated data showed a systematic dependence of Ea on α indicating a simple decomposition process. No significant changes in the thermal decomposition behavior of silver acetate were recorded as a result of γ-irradiation. Calcinations of γ-irradiated silver acetate (CH<sub>3</sub>COOAg) at 200 °C for 2 hours only led to the formation of pure Ag<sub>2</sub>O mono-dispersed nanoparticles. X-ray diffraction, FTIR and SEM techniques were employed for characterization of the synthesized nanoparticles.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>non-isothermal decomposition</kwd>
<kwd>γ-irradiation</kwd>
<kwd>silver oxide</kwd>
<kwd>nanoparticles</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro">
<title>1. Introduction</title>
<p>Thermal treatment of inorganic substances has great synthetic potential as it may turn simple compounds into advanced materials, such as ceramics, catalysts, and glass and could reproducibly lead in most cases to metal or metal oxide nanoparticles displaying a very narrow size distribution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b1-ijms-11-03600">1</xref>]. Many recent studies on the thermal decomposition of inorganic solids have included measurements on samples that were exposed to radiation prior to heating with the air to investigate the effect of ionizing radiation on the kinetics and thermal decomposition behavior of inorganic compounds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b2-ijms-11-03600">2</xref>]. Silver acetate is a suitable metallic organic compound for preparation of silver nanoparticles for medical applications such as diagnostic biomedical optical imaging, and biological implants like heart valves [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b3-ijms-11-03600">3</xref>].</p>
<p>In the present investigation, thermal decomposition behavior of un-irradiated and γ-irradiated silver acetate was investigated in air with the aim to (a) examine the kinetics of non-isothermal, decomposition of both unirradiated and γ-irradiated silver acetate using a model free iso-conversional approach and compare the results with those obtained in our previously reported investigation using model fitting method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b4-ijms-11-03600">4</xref>] (b) to clarify the effects of, γ-irradiation on the thermal decomposition behavior, and (c) finally to follow the chemical composition of the solid residue obtained at different temperatures while attempting to prepare Ag<sub>2</sub>O at nanoscale by thermal decomposition of silver acetate in the air.</p></sec>
<sec sec-type="results|discussion">
<title>2. Results and Discussion</title>
<p>The TG curve showed that decomposition of silver acetate (CH<sub>3</sub>COOAg) proceeds, in one major decomposition step in the temperature range of 200–280 °C, the formation of Ag(0) as solid residue. Non-isothermal decomposition of silver acetate was previously studied in detail in an inert atmosphere [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b5-ijms-11-03600">5</xref>]. This decomposition step was associated with two minor and one major sharp endothermic peaks as shown in DTA curve in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1-ijms-11-03600">Figure 1</xref>. This indicates that the main decomposition step probably contains three overlapping decomposition steps. A weight gain was detected in the temperature of 300–400 °C attributed to oxidation of Ag(0) and formation of silver oxide Ag<sub>2</sub>O as solid product. This weight gain was characterized by a sharp exothermic peak centered at ≈350 °C. Minor decomposition was recorded after 400 °C and up to 500 °C associated with broad exothermic peak and could be ascribed to formation of non-stoichiometric silver oxide.</p>
<p>No significant changes were detected with the thermal decomposition behavior of silver acetate as a result of γ-irradiation up to 10<sup>3</sup> kGy total γ-ray dose absorbed by the sample, except that the onset temperature was found at a relatively lower temperature by about 20 °C for γ-irradiated sample.</p>
<p>The dynamic data for both un-irradiated and γ-irradiated silver acetate with 10<sup>3</sup> kGy γ-ray dose are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2-ijms-11-03600">Figure 2</xref>. The application of both linear (EWZ) and non-linear (VYZ) model free iso-conversional methods, to the non-isothermal decomposition data for both un-irradiated and γ-irradiated silver acetate with 10<sup>2</sup> kGy total γ-ray dose, permits a determination of E<sub>a</sub> as a function of α, and the results are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3-ijms-11-03600">Figure 3</xref>, where the values of activation energies for both unirradiated and gamma irradiated samples are almost identical and, therefore, we represent the variation in one single curve. The results of the application of these two model free approaches on the investigated data in general showed a systematic dependence of E<sub>a</sub> on the extent of conversion of silver acetate α, indicating a simple decomposition process with almost the same estimated values of E<sub>a</sub> using two free approach models on the linear (FWO) and non-linear (VYZ) methods: E<sub>a</sub> is ≈140 kJ mol<sup>−1</sup> and 120 kJ mol<sup>−1</sup> at the beginning of decomposition, then reaches a minimum of 80 kJ mol<sup>−1</sup> at the end of the decomposition for both un-irradiated and γ-irradiated samples. The relative lower E<sub>a</sub> value obtained at the start of decomposition for γ-irradiated sample could be attributed to the formation of additional decomposition centers created by trapped electrons and holes in the host lattice.</p>
<sec>
<title>2.1. IR, XRD, SEM and TEM Measurements</title>
<p>IR spectra of both un-irradiated and γ-irradiated silver acetate display the characteristic bands assigned to various vibration modes of acetate functional groups. Neither disappearance nor appearance of new bands was recorded in the IR spectrum of γ-irradiated silver acetate with 10<sup>3</sup> kGy total γ-ray dose, but a decrease in the intensity of most characteristic bands was recorded as a result of γ-irradiation. The band assigned to ν<sub>Ag-O</sub> is around 550 cm<sup>−1</sup> and was more affected by irradiation than any other band in the spectrum. The decrease in the intensity of this band could be attributed to bond scission and/or degradation caused by γ-irradiation.</p>
<p>XRD patterns of un-irradiated and γ-irradiated silver acetate are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4-ijms-11-03600">Figure 4a,b</xref>, respectively, both showed the same characteristic features of monoclinic system without any significant changes occurring as a result of γ-irradiation with 10<sup>3</sup> kGy total γ-ray dose.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>2.2. Role of Irradiation</title>
<p>Upon irradiation with <sup>60</sup>Co γ-ray, the Compton effect has the largest cross-section, except for materials of very high atomic number and, moreover, the number of atoms displaced has its maximum effect in the very light elements and diminishes to zero around atomic number 125 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b6-ijms-11-03600">6</xref>]. γ-Irradiation generates additional sites of potential nucleation. These may be crystal defects or reactive radicals that are not necessarily identical with intrinsic nucleation sites but are of comparable reactivity and, or most probably, evolve by a similar sequence of steps into nuclei growth. More extensive irradiation shifts advance the onset of reaction; this is envisaged as being due to the involvement of a small amount of decomposition products, which promote the transformation of all precursor-specific sites into active growth nuclei. The kinetic of growth of all nuclei are identical. The observed increase in reaction rate for γ-irradiated samples is ascribed to a direct relationship between the extent of salt, γ-irradiation and number of nuclei developed on subsequent decomposition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b7-ijms-11-03600">7</xref>].</p>
<p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5-ijms-11-03600">Figure 5</xref> shows the representative XRD pattern of as-synthesized silver oxide nanoparticles. All diffraction lines are indexed to monoclinic Ag<sub>2</sub>O. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6-ijms-11-03600">Figure 6</xref> shows SEM image of the sample. It can be seen that Ag<sub>2</sub>O is present as nanorods over which tiny and agglomerated particles are formed. The morphology of prepared nanoparticles was studied by TEM. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7-ijms-11-03600">Figure 7</xref> shows the typical image for Ag<sub>2</sub>O nanoparticles. These nanoparticles have an average diameter of 2–3 nm. In the TEM images, the shape of these nanoparticles is rod- like, the same as observed in SEM images without any evidence of aggregation.</p>
<p>IR spectrum of as-prepared Ag<sub>2</sub>O nanoparticles display the characteristic band attributed to lattice vibration of Ag<sub>2</sub>O at 550 cm<sup>−1</sup>.</p></sec></sec>
<sec>
<title>3. Experimental Section</title>
<p>Silver acetate with 99.999% (wt.%) purity was obtained commercially from (BDH, UK). The sample used for investigation was dried at 200 °C to ensure complete dehydration.</p>
<p>The decomposition of silver acetate in air yields Ag<sub>2</sub>O and volatile products, and, within the experimental error, eventually goes to completion. The weights of investigated samples were in the range of 100 mg. The decomposition followed in air using dynamic thermogravimetric techniques in the temperature range (25–800 °C).</p>
<p>Under dynamic non-isothermal conditions four linear heating rates (5, 10, 15, 20 °C/min) were applied. For irradiation experiments, samples were encapsulated under vacuum in glass vials and exposed to successively increasing doses of radiation at constant intensity using a cobalt-60 γ-ray cell 220 (Nordion, INT-INC, Ontario, Canada) at a dose rate of 10<sup>4</sup> Gy/h. The source was calibrated against a Fricke ferrous sulfate dosimeter and the dose rate in the irradiated samples was calculated by applying appropriate corrections on the basis of both the photon mass attenuation and energy absorption coefficient for the sample and dosimeter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b8-ijms-11-03600">8</xref>]. The fraction decomposed or the extent of conversion α was calculated as:</p>
<disp-formula>
<mml:math display="block">
<mml:semantics>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>α</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub>
<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>where M<sub>0</sub>, M, M<sub>f</sub> are the initial, actual and final sample mass, respectively.</p>
<sec>
<title>3.1. Synthesis of Ag<sub>2</sub>O Nanoparticles</title>
<p>A sample of γ-irradiated silver acetate with a 10<sup>3</sup> kGy total γ-ray dose was heated for 2 hours in a furnace at 200 °C where a black residue was obtained. The two separate solid residues were collected and subjected to analysis using solid state characterization techniques including XRD, FTIR, SEM and TEM measurements. A parallel experiment was performed starting with un-irradiated silver acetate, where the solid black residue was observed after heating for 24 hours at 300 °C.</p>
<p>The infrared spectra were recorded in KBr pellets using a Perkin-Elmer 1000FT-IR spectrophotometer.</p>
<p>XRD measurements were carried out on a Siemens D5000 X-ray diffractometer using a nickel filter (Cu Kα at λ = 1.5418 Å).</p>
<p>SEM was performed using JSM 6360 ASEM instrument. TEM was performed using TEM-200 CX instrument (Japan).</p>
<p>Further experiments concerning preparation of silver oxide nanoparticles using sol-gel methods starting from un-irradiated and γ-irradiated silver acetate and silver acetyl acetonate are now in progress at our laboratory at King Saud University.</p>
<p><bold>Theory</bold>: a single step process for solid state decomposition has the following kinetic equations:</p>
<disp-formula id="FD1">
<label>(1)</label>
<mml:math display="block">
<mml:semantics>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>α</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>where α is the extent of conversion, k(t) is a temperature dependent reaction rate constant and f(α) the kinetics dependent model function. The Arrhenius equation expresses the explicit temperature dependency of the rate constant as:</p>
<disp-formula>
<label>(2)</label>
<mml:math display="block">
<mml:semantics>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>exp</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>α</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>The A, E<sub>a</sub> and f(α) are called the kinetic triplet that can characterize a unique decomposition reaction. Under non-isothermal conditions in which a sample is heated at a constant rate, the explicit time dependence in <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD1">Equation (1)</xref> is eliminated through the trivial transformation:</p>
<disp-formula>
<label>(3)</label>
<mml:math display="block">
<mml:semantics>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>α</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>where β = dT/dt is the heating rate.</p>
<p>Upon integration, <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD1">Equation (1)</xref> gives:</p>
<disp-formula>
<label>(4)</label>
<mml:math display="block">
<mml:semantics>
<mml:mtable columnalign="left">
<mml:mtr>
<mml:mtd>
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>α</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mo>∫</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:munderover>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>α</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mo>∫</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:munderover>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>exp</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>α</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr>
<mml:mtr>
<mml:mtd>
<mml:mo>≈</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mo>∫</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:munderover>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>exp</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mo>∫</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:munderover>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>exp</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr>
<mml:mtr>
<mml:mtd>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>≡</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mfrac>
<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>where P(x) is the exponential integral for x = Ea/RT. The temperature integral I (E<sub>α</sub>, T) has no analytical solution but many approximations.</p>
<p>The linear iso-conversional integral method, suggested independently by Flynn and Wall and Ozawa, uses Dolyle’s approximation of P(x) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b9-ijms-11-03600">9</xref>]. The method is based on equation:</p>
<disp-formula>
<label>(5)</label>
<mml:math display="block">
<mml:semantics>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>ln</mml:mtext>
<mml:mi>β</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>ln</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:msub>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>α</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>5.3305</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1.052</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>Thus for α = constant. The plot lnβ <italic>versus</italic> (1/T), obtained from thermograms recorded at several heating rates, should be a straight line, the slope of which can be used to evaluate the apparent activation energy E<sub>a</sub>.</p>
<p>A nonlinear iso-conversional method has been developed by Vyazovekin that avoids inaccuracies associated with analytical approximation of the temperature integral [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b10-ijms-11-03600">10</xref>], for a set of n experiments carried out at different heating rates, the activation energy can be determined at any particular value of α by finding the value of E<sub>a</sub> for which the objective function Ω is minimized, where:</p>
<disp-formula>
<label>(6)</label>
<mml:math display="block">
<mml:semantics>
<mml:mtable columnalign="left">
<mml:mtr>
<mml:mtd>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mo>∑</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:munderover>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mo>∑</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>≠</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:munderover>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr>
<mml:mtr>
<mml:mtd>
<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mo>∫</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:msub>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:munderover>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>exp</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>We have developed a mathematical program to evaluate the temperature integral and the results have been compared with Cai <italic>et al</italic>. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b11-ijms-11-03600">11</xref>] approximation where:</p>
<disp-formula>
<label>(7)</label>
<mml:math display="block">
<mml:semantics>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mo>∫</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:munderover>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>exp</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>α</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>α</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>[</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>α</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0.66691</mml:mn></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>α</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2.64943</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>exp</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>α</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></disp-formula></sec></sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions">
<title>4. Conclusions</title>
<p>No significant changes were observed in the thermal decomposition behavior between unirradiated and γ-irradiated samples. Calcinations of γ-irradiated silver acetate (CH<sub>3</sub>COOAg) at 200 °C for 2 hours only led to the formation of Ag<sub>2</sub>O mono-dispersed nanoparticles. Attempts to prepare silver oxide nanoparticles using unirradiated samples under the same conditions were unsuccessful. The SEM and TEM show the formation of nanorods. The TEM shows the diameter of these rods to be between 2–3 nm. To our knowledge this is the first report to prepare Ag<sub>2</sub>O nanoparticles by solid state thermal decomposition of γ-irradiated silver acetate.</p></sec></body>
<back>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgements</title>
<p>Financial support by Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (SABIC) is greatly acknowledgement.</p></ack>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="b1-ijms-11-03600"><label>1</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mahfouz</surname><given-names>RM</given-names></name><name><surname>Siddiqui</surname><given-names>MR</given-names></name><name><surname>Al-Ahmari</surname><given-names>SA</given-names></name><name><surname>Alkyali</surname><given-names>WZ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Kinetics analysis of thermal decomposition of un-irradiated and γ-irradiated tris(acetylacetonate)-Ruthenium(III)[Ru(AcAc)<sub>3</sub>]</article-title><source>Prog. React. Kinet. Mechan</source><year>2007</year><volume>32</volume><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>27</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3184/146867807X217337</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b2-ijms-11-03600"><label>2</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Al-Khamis</surname><given-names>KM</given-names></name><name><surname>Al-Othman</surname><given-names>ZA</given-names></name><name><surname>Mahfouz</surname><given-names>RM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Kinetics studies of the non-isothermal decomposition of un-irrdiated and γ-irradiated gallium acetylacetonate</article-title><source>Prog. React. Kinet. Mechan</source><year>2010</year><volume>35</volume><fpage>131</fpage><lpage>151</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3184/146867810X12700573609126</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b3-ijms-11-03600"><label>3</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Balan</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Malval</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name><name><surname>Schneider</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Burget</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Silver nanoparticles: new synthesis characterization and photophysical properties</article-title><source>Mater. Chem. Phys</source><year>2007</year><volume>104</volume><fpage>417</fpage><lpage>421</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.matchemphys.2007.03.036</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b4-ijms-11-03600"><label>4</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mahfouz</surname><given-names>RM</given-names></name><name><surname>Bumajdad</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Al-Sagheer</surname><given-names>FA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>γ-Irradiation effects on the kinetic and mechanism of the thermal decomposition of silver acetate</article-title><source>Radiat. Effects Defects Solids</source><year>2009</year><volume>164</volume><fpage>170</fpage><lpage>177</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10420150802655716</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b5-ijms-11-03600"><label>5</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Logvinenko</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Polunina</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Mikhailov</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Bokhonov</surname><given-names>BJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Study of thermal decomposition of silver acetate</article-title><source>Therm. Anal. Cal</source><year>2007</year><volume>90</volume><fpage>813</fpage><lpage>816</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10973-006-7883-9</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b6-ijms-11-03600"><label>6</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mahfouz</surname><given-names>RM</given-names></name><name><surname>Monshi</surname><given-names>MAS</given-names></name><name><surname>Abd El-Salam</surname><given-names>NM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Kinetics of the thermal decomposition of γ-irradiated gadolinium acetate</article-title><source>Thermochim. Acta</source><year>2002</year><volume>38</volume><fpage>95</fpage><lpage>101</lpage></citation></ref>
<ref id="b7-ijms-11-03600"><label>7</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Galwey</surname><given-names>AK</given-names></name><name><surname>Herley</surname><given-names>PJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Mohamed</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Thermal decomposition of γ-irradiated silver malonate</article-title><source>J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans</source><year>1988</year><volume>184</volume><fpage>729</fpage><lpage>738</lpage></citation></ref>
<ref id="b8-ijms-11-03600"><label>8</label><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Spinks</surname><given-names>JWT</given-names></name><name><surname>Woods</surname><given-names>RJ</given-names></name></person-group><source>An Introduction to Radiation Chemistry</source><publisher-name>John Wiley &amp; Sons</publisher-name><publisher-loc>New York, NY, USA</publisher-loc><year>1990</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b9-ijms-11-03600"><label>9</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Doyle</surname><given-names>CD</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Kinetic analysis of thermogravimetric data</article-title><source>J. Appl. Polym. Sci</source><year>1961</year><volume>5</volume><fpage>285</fpage><lpage>292</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/app.1961.070051506</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b10-ijms-11-03600"><label>10</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vyazovkin</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Wight</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Model-free and model-fitting approaches to kinetic analysis of isothermal and non-isothermal data</article-title><source>Themochim. Acta</source><year>1999</year><volume>340–341</volume><fpage>53</fpage><lpage>68</lpage></citation></ref>
<ref id="b11-ijms-11-03600"><label>11</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cai</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Yao</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Yi</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>He</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>New temperature integral approximation for non-isothermal kinetics</article-title><source>AlChE J</source><year>2006</year><volume>52</volume><fpage>1554</fpage><lpage>1557</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/aic.10732</pub-id></citation></ref></ref-list>
<sec sec-type="display-objects">
<title>Figures</title>
<fig id="f1-ijms-11-03600" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>TG and DTA of silver acetate.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="ijms-11-03600f1.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f2-ijms-11-03600" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Thermogravimetric data showing the extent of (<bold>a</bold>) un-irradiated and (<bold>b</bold>) γ-irradiated sliver acetate conversion during non-isothermal decomposition.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="ijms-11-03600f2a.gif"/><graphic xlink:href="ijms-11-03600f2b.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f3-ijms-11-03600" position="float">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Activation energy Ea Vs α curves for un-irradiated and γ-irradiated sliver acetate.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="ijms-11-03600f3.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f4-ijms-11-03600" position="float">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>XRD for sliver acetate (<bold>a</bold>) un-irradiated and (<bold>b</bold>) γ-irradiated (10<sup>3</sup> kGy).</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="ijms-11-03600f4.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f5-ijms-11-03600" position="float">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption>
<p>XRD pattern for synthesized silver oxide nanoparticles.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="ijms-11-03600f5.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f6-ijms-11-03600" position="float">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption>
<p>SEM image of sliver oxide nanoparticles.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="ijms-11-03600f6.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f7-ijms-11-03600" position="float">
<label>Figure 7</label>
<caption>
<p>TEM image of sliver oxide nanoparticles.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="ijms-11-03600f7.gif"/></fig></sec></back></article>
