Next Article in Journal
Use of Physcion to Improve Atopic Dermatitis-Like Skin Lesions through Blocking of Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin
Next Article in Special Issue
Novel Carbon/PEDOT/PSS-Based Screen-Printed Biosensors for Acetylcholine Neurotransmitter and Acetylcholinesterase Detection in Human Serum
Previous Article in Journal
Stearic Acid/Inorganic Porous Matrix Phase Change Composite for Hot Water Systems
Previous Article in Special Issue
Degradation of Proteins and Starch by Combined Immobilization of Protease, α-Amylase and β-Galactosidase on a Single Electrospun Nanofibrous Membrane
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Highly Efficient Indirect P. pastoris Surface Display Method Based on the CL7/Im7 Ultra-High-Affinity System

1
State Key Laboratory of Biocatalysis and Enzyme Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China
2
Hubei Key Laboratory of Industrial Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China
3
Hubei Collaborative Innovation Center for Green Transformation of Bio-Resources, School of Life Sciences, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2019, 24(8), 1483; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24081483
Submission received: 27 February 2019 / Revised: 3 April 2019 / Accepted: 10 April 2019 / Published: 15 April 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Enzyme Immobilization and Its Applications)

Abstract

:
Cell surface display systems for immobilization of peptides and proteins on the surface of cells have various applications, such as vaccine generation, protein engineering, bio-conversion and bio-adsorption. Though plenty of methods have been established in terms of traditional yeast surface display systems, the development of a universal display method with high efficiency remains a challenge. Here we report an indirect yeast surface display method by anchoring Im7 proteins on the surface of P. pastoris, achieving highly efficient display of target proteins, including fluorescence proteins (sfGFP and mCherry) or enzymes (human Arginase I), with a CL7 fusion tag through the ultra-high-affinity interaction between Im7 and CL7. This indirect P. pastoris surface display approach is highly efficient and provides a robust platform for displaying biomolecules.

1. Introduction

Taking advantage of natural surface proteins or their fragments as the anchoring motifs, peptides or proteins of interest can be displayed on the surfaces of various microorganisms or cells such as phages [1], spores [2], E. coli [3], mammalian [4] and yeast cells [5]. Depending on the characteristics of passenger and carrier proteins, C-terminal, N-terminal and sandwich fusion strategies were used for surface display [6]. The surface display peptides or proteins have a plethora of biotechnological and industrial applications, including development of vaccines through displayed antigens to elicit antigen specific immune responses [7], target peptides and proteins screening from libraries using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) [8], construction of whole-cell biocatalysts, as well as the design of bio-sensor and electro-chemical devices [9].
Yeasts are genetically amenable and can be easily grown with low technological threshold [6]. Thus, many kinds of yeast species, especially for S. cerevisiae, have been widely used for surface display. Of note, the large cell size of yeast allows surface display of a relatively large number of protein molecules per cell (~104–105). Combined with FACS, researchers can readily achieve quantitation of the surface-display proteins as well as rapid library screening [6]. Other species of yeast and fungi have also been employed for surface display. Among them, the most used yeast is P. pastoris which can reach a much higher cell density than S. cerevisiae in fermentation, as well as can be utilized for preparation of recombinant protein. Nevertheless, the incumbent yeast display methods, where the target proteins are directly displayed on the cell surface, have many limitations. One of which is the unsubstantial efficiency. An indirect P. pastoris cell surface display methodology has therefore been reported [10]. In the study, a short biotin acceptor peptide (BAP) derived from E. coli biotin ligase (BirA) was fused to the N-terminus of a yeast surface anchor protein termed Flo428. The BAP-Flo428 fusion protein and BirA were co-expressed, leading to the display of the biotinylated BAP on P. pastoris cell surface. Finally, the addition of streptavidin-FITC (fluorescein isothiocyanate) resulted in the display of streptavidin-FITC.
Recently, Vassylyev et al. reported an efficient one-step ultra-high-affinity chromatography system for the purification of proteins with high yield, high purity and high activity [11]. In this system, the 16 KDa CL7 tag which was engineered from the E. coli Colicin E7 DNase (CE7) retains the ultra-high binding affinity (KD~10−14–10−17 M) with its inhibitor 10 KDa Immunity protein 7 (Im7). Inspired by the work, we sought to develop a universal indirect P. pastoris surface display method based on the CL7/Im7 ultra-high-affinity system (Figure 1). Accordingly, Im7 was fused to the N-terminus of SED1 protein [12] from S. cerevisiae and the fusion protein Im7-SED1 could be efficiently displayed on the cell surface of P. pastoris. Based on the fluorometric assay using CL7 fused sfGFP, we found that ~2.8 × 106 of CL7-sfGFP molecules per yeast cell were indirectly displayed on the surface of P. pastoris. Furthermore, in a practice study, the enzyme activities of human Arginase I immobilized on the yeast surface by this approach were measured, resulting in ~ 5045 U per 1 g dry yeast cells. Taken together, we developed a highly efficient P. pastoris surface display system which has wide application prospects.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. General Strategy

To establish a novel indirect P. pastoris cell surface display system that can efficiently display unnatural molecules, we take advantage of the ultra-high-affinity interaction of Im7 and CL7 tag in this work. The principle of our method is illustrated in Figure 1. Initially, the gene of Im7-SED1 fusion protein was integrated into P. pastoris genomes. Then, after induction of yeast cells by 1% (v/v) methanol in BMMY, the Im7-SED1 was displayed on the yeast surface. At last, the addition of CL7 fused proteins resulted in the highly efficient indirect display of target proteins on the yeast cell surface via the super strong interaction of Im7 and CL7 partner (KD~10−14–10−17 M).

2.2. Plasmid Construction

Firstly, the DNA fragments encoding CL7, sfGFP, mCherry, human Arginase I, CL7-sfGFP, CL7-mCherry and CL7-human Arginase I (CL7-huArg I) were amplified by PCR using corresponding primers. Then, the DNA fragments of CL7-sfGFP, CL7-mCherry and CL7-human Arginase I were cloned into vector pET23a-gfp [13] using Nde I and Xho I restriction enzymes. In addition, the DNA fragments encoding for a (G4S)2 linker and an HRV 3C recognition site were also inserted between CL7 and the target proteins, resulting in plasmids pET23a-CL7-sfGFP, pET23a-CL7-mCherry and pET23a-CL7-huArg I (Figure 2A), respectively. Next, the yeast surface anchor protein SED1 from S. cerevisiae without its signal sequence was amplified [12]. Based on the P. pastoris expression vector pPICZαA, we constructed the plasmid pPICZαA-HA-SED1 (Figure 2B) which contains an HA epitope, a multiple clone site, a glycine-serine peptide linker as well as the anchor protein SED1. The restriction enzyme sites Nhe I, Nde I, Hpa I and Apa I were inserted as the multiple cloning sites. Similarly, the plasmid pPICZαA-HA-Im7-SED1 was constructed following the workflow shown in Figure 2C.

2.3. Expression of CL7 Fusion Proteins

The fusion proteins including CL7-sfGFP, CL7-mCherry and CL7-huArg I were expressed in BL21(DE3) E. coli and purified by Ni2+-affinity chromatography (Ni-NTA). The protein samples were detected by 12% SDS-PAGE gels (Figure 3) and analyzed by software ImageJ (Table 1). The recovery efficiency of CL7 fusion proteins eluted by different concentrations of imidazole were calculated. Typically, CL7-sfGFP and CL7-mCherry eluted with 200 mM imidazole, as well as CL7-huArg I eluted with 150 mM and 200 mM imidazole were collected and concentrated. All protein concentrations were determined by the Bradford method using a protein assay kit.

2.4. Flow Cytometry Analysis

The GS115/pPICZαA, GS115/pPICZαA-HA-SED1 and GS115/pPICZαA-HA-Im7-SED1 cells were induced in BMMY medium containing 1% (v/v) methanol for 24 h and were then analyzed by flow cytometry [12]. As a negative control, the unlabeled GS115/pPICZαA cells were used (Figure 4A). The GS115/pPICZαA, GS115/pPICZαA HA-SED1 and GS115/pPICZαA HA-Im7-SED1 cells were labeled by DyLight 649-conjungated goat anti-mouse antibodies, as well as by CL7-sfGFP proteins and mouse anti-HA tag monoclonal antibodies. None of DyLight 649 and CL7-sfGFP fluorescence were observed for GS115/pPICZαA cells (Figure 4B), indicating that there was non-specific protein adsorption on the yeast cell surface. The GS115/pPICZαA HA-SED1 cells showed red DyLight 649 fluorescence (Figure 4C), however no green CL7-sfGFP fluorescence (Figure 4C). In contrast, the GS115/pPICZαA HA-Im7-SED1 cells showed both red and green fluorescence (Figure 4D). These results demonstrate that the HA-SED1 and HA-Im7-SED1 fusion proteins were anchored on the yeast cell surface and the cell surface immobilization of CL7-sfGFP proteins was indirectly displayed by Im7 proteins specifically (Figure 4).

2.5. Fluorescence Microscopy

The fluorescence microscopy assays (Figure 5) were performed using the above-mentioned P. pastoris cells in the presence of CL7-mCherry fusion proteins (Figure 5, right row) and in the presence of mouse anti-HA tag monoclonal antibodies together with FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibodies (Figure 5, middle row). The GS115/pPICZαA cells did not show green and red fluorescence, while the GS115/pPICZαA HA-SED1 cells only showed green fluorescence on the edges. In contrast, both green and red fluorescence were observed on the edges of GS115/pPICZαA HA-Im7-SED1 cells. Collectively, the fluorescence microscopy data and flow cytometry results shown above clearly demonstrate that sfGFP and mCherry were indirectly displayed on the surface of P. pastoris cells through the interaction between Im7 and CL7 tags.

2.6. Western Blotting and Blue Light Transmitter Analysis

The display of HA-SED1 and HA-SED1-Im7 proteins on the surface of P. pastoris cells (Figure 6a, lane 1 and lane 2) were validated by western-blot with HA specific antibodies. As a control, no bands were detected for GS115/pPICZαA cells (Figure 6a, lane 3). The observed molecular weights of HA-SED1 and HA-Im7-SED1 were around 180 kDa, which are both much higher than the anticipated values (36 kDa for HA-SED1 and 45 kDa for HA-Im7-SED1), possibly due to the glycosylation of these SED1 fusion proteins. Under the blue light transmitter (Figure 6b), the GS115/pPICZαA HA-Im7-SED1 cells incubated with CL7-sfGFP showed a very bright green (Figure 6b, tube 4). In contrast, the GS115/pPICZαA HA-SED1 cells in the presence or absence of CL7-sfGFP (Figure 6b, tube 1 and 2), as well as the GS115/pPICZαA HA-Im7-SED1 cells (Figure 6b, tube 3) in the absence of CL7-sfGFP did not show green fluorescence.

2.7. Fluorometric Assay

The CL7-sfGFP indirectly displayed on the P. pastoris surface were quantified according to the protocol [14]. The excitation wavelength and emission wavelength of CL7-sfGFP in TBS (tris-buffered saline, pH 7.6) were determined by wavelength scanning (Figure 7). Thus, the wavelength of 490 nm and 512 nm were used as the optimal excitation and emission wavelength. To prepare the calibration curve of CL7-sfGFP (Figure 8), the fluorescence intensities of distinct amounts of CL7-sfGFP fusion proteins in 1 mL TBS were used. Next, the fluorescence intensity and OD600 of cells incubated with different CL7-sfGFP were examined and the fluorescence intensity/OD600 (F/A) values were calculated and are summarized in Figure 9. The GS115/pPICZαA-HA-SED1 cells incubated with 120 μg of CL7-sfGFP showed a similar F/A value (Table 2) in comparison to GS115/pPICZαA-HA-SED1 cells without CL7-sfGFP proteins (p > 0.05), indicating that there is no non-specific binding between CL7-sfGFP and P. pastoris cells or surface displayed HA-SED1. On the other hand, the F/A values of GS115/pPICZαA-HA-Im7-SED1 cells incubated with 60 μg and 100 μg of CL7-sfGFP proteins showed no obvious differences (p > 0.05), which indicates that 60 μg CL7-sfGFP already saturated surface displayed Im7 proteins. The calculated CL7-sfGFP displayed on yeast surface is ~10.4 μg per mL of 1 OD600 P. pastoris cells. Paus et al. indicated that 1 mL of P. pastoris (OD600 = 1) has ~5 × 107 cells [15]. Therefore, the number of indirect displayed CL7-sfGFP molecules per cell should be calculated as N = m * NA/(M*5 × 107), where m is 10.0 × 10−6 g, M is molecule weight of CL7-sfGFP (44.4 kDa) and NA is the Avogadro’s number. So, ~2.83 × 106 of the CL7-sfGFP fusion protein molecules per cell were displayed by P. pastoris cells using this method. Of note, ~17.8 mg CL7-sfGFP per 1 g dry yeast cell was immobilized on the yeast surface according to the calculation in the following. For each assay, about 1.5 mL of yeast cells was collected and weighted (~51.9 mg). They were then resuspended and diluted in 1 mL TBS following measurement of their OD600 by UV/VIS. The calculated OD600 of 51.9 mg yeast cells was 23 ± 0.2, therefore the OD600 of 1 g wet yeast cells was 443.2. The mass of dehydrated yeast cells from 1 mL wet yeast cells was 10.8 ± 0.1 mg. Thus, the mass ratio between dry and wet P. pastoris cells is 26.2%. Finally, the CL7-sfGFP immobilized by 1 g dry yeast cells (m) was calculated according to the formula: m = m1*n/R (m1, 10.4 μg, the mass cof CL7-sfGFP immobilized by 1 mL of 1 OD600 P. pastoris cells; n, 443.2, the OD600 of 1 g wet yeast cells; R, 26.2%, the mass ratio between dry and wet P. pastoris cells).

2.8. Enzyme Activity Assays for the Free and Surface Displayed CL7-huArg I

The l-ornithine concentration was detected using the colorimetric assay [16], resulting in a calibration curve shown in Figure 10. According to the fluorometric assay results above, we found that ~20.9 μg CL7-huArg I (52.2 kDa) CL7-sfGFP per 1 g dry yeast cell was immobilized on the yeast surface. After enzymatic reactions, the l-ornithine contents in supernatant were analyzed. One unit of enzyme activity is defined as the activity of enzyme that produced 1 μmol of l-ornithine in 1 min. As a result, the activity of free CL7-huArg I is 504.5 U/mg and the activity of displayed enzymes is 261.3 U/mg, indicating that ~50% enzyme activity can be retained after immobilization. The activity of CL7-huArg I that was immobilized by dry yeast cells is 5045 U/g.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Plasmids and Strains

E. coli strain DH5α was used as the host for DNA manipulation. E. coli strain BL21(DE3) was used for protein expression. P. pastoris strain GS115 and the vector pPICZαA was obtained from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). The vector pET23a-T [13], pET23a-CL7, pHBM905a-Arg I [17], pCDNA3.1-mCherry and pET23a-sfGFP was constructed and stored in our laboratory.

3.2. Construction of CL7-sfGFP, CL7-mCherry and CL7-huArg I Expression Plasmids

The expression plasmids for CL7-sfGFP, CL7-mCherry and CL7-huArg I fusion proteins with C-terminal 6× His tags were constructed as follows. The DNA fragments encoding CL7 tag and (G4S)2 linker were amplified from the plasmid pET23a-CL7 by PCR using the primers CL7F and CL7R. The DNA fragments including (G4S)2 linker, HRV 3C recognition site and sfGFP were amplified from the plasmid pET23a-sfGFP by PCR using the primers GS3CF, sfGFPF and sfGFPR. The DNA fragment encoding CL7-(G4S)2-3C-sfGFP was amplified from the above CL7 and sfGFP PCR products using primers CL7F/sfGFPR and cloned into pET23a-T vector employing Nde I and Xho I. A Nhe I site was introduced between HRV 3C recognition site and sfGFP. The plasmid was named pET23a-CL7-sfGFP. Similarly, the DNA fragments encoding mCherry and human Arginase I were amplified from pCDNA3.1-mCherry and pHBM905a-Arg I [17]. The plasmids were constructed and named pET23a-CL7-mCherry and pET23a-CL7-huArg I using the primer pairs mCherryF/mCherryR and huArgIF/huArgIR. All the primers used are shown in Table 3.

3.3. Construction of the P. pastoris Surface Display Plasmids

The plasmids for P. pastoris surface display of SED1 fusion proteins with a N-terminal HA tag were constructed as follows. The gene encoding SED1 protein [12] without original secretion signal sequence was obtained by PCR from the genome of S. cerevisiae strain INVSC1 using the primers SED1F/SED1R. The above PCR products were used as templates for obtaining gene encoding HA-SED1 using the primers ZαHAF, HA-MCSF, MCS-GSF and SED1R. The restriction enzyme sites including Nhe I, Nde I, Hpa I, Apa I and a glycine-serine peptide linker were inserted between HA and SED1. The corresponding DNA fragment was cloned into the vector pPICZαA between EcoR I and Sac II, producing the plasmid termed pPICZαA-HA-SED1. The E. coli Im7 gene was obtained by PCR from pPICZαA-Im7 using the primers Im7F and Im7R. The corresponding DNA fragment was cloned into pPICZαA-SED1 between Nhe I and Apa I, producing the plasmid called pPICZαA-HA-Im7-SED1. The primers used are shown in Table 4.

3.4. Expression and Purification of CL7-mCherry, CL7-sfGFP and CL7-huArg I

The plasmids pET23a-CL7-mCherry, pET23a-CL7-sfGFP and pET23a-CL7-huArg I were transformed into BL21(DE3) chemical competent cells and plated on Luria Bertani broth (LB) plates containing 100 μg/mL ampicillin. Then, one single colony of BL21(DE3) cells on the plates was grown overnight at 37 °C and 200 rpm in 250 mL flasks containing 50 mL of Luria Bertani broth (LB) containing 100 μg/mL ampicillin. The precultured cells were used to inoculate 1 L flasks containing 100 mL of Luria Bertani broth (LB) with 100 μg/mL ampicillin and were grown at 37 °C at 200 rpm. When OD600 reached 0.6, the cells were induced with 1 mM IPTG, grown for another 4 h and then harvested by centrifugation.
The bacterial pellet corresponding to 100 mL of culture was washed two times in Tris-buffered saline (TBS, 50 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6) and resuspended in 25 mL of TBS buffer containing 1 mM PMSF and 10 mM imidazole. The solution was sonicated for 10 min and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm at 4 °C for 0.5 h. The supernatant was used for Ni2+-affinity chromatography. The reins binding with fusion proteins were washed with 25mL of 20 mM imidazole in TBS five times and were eluted with 4 mL of 50 mM, 100 mM, 150 mM and 200 mM imidazole in TBS sequentially. The protein samples were fractionated by 12% SDS-PAGE gels. The bands of CL7 fusion protein in Figure 3 were analyzed by ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). The recovery efficiency of CL7 fusion protein eluted with 4 mL of 50, 100, 150 and 200 mM imidazole were calculated (Table 1). The CL7-sfGFP and CL7-mCherry fusion proteins eluted with 200 mM imidazole and CL7-huArginase I eluted with 150 mM and 200 mM imidazole were collected, concentrated and determined by the Bradford method using a protein assay kit from Beyotime (Beijing, China).

3.5. Yeast Transformation, Cultivation and Induction

The plasmids pPICZαA-HA-Im7-SED1 and pPICZαA-HA-SED1 were digested with Pme I and transformed into the GS115 electrocompetent cells according to the manual. Transformants were isolated by incubation at 28 °C for 48 h on YPD plates supplemented with 100 μg/mL of Zeocin. Then, five to 10 single colonies of transformants were inoculated in 20 mL of BMGY in 250 mL flasks and cultivated at 28 °C under 200 rpm. After 24 h, the cells were centrifuged at 5000× g for 5 min, resuspended in 20 mL of BMMY medium containing 1% (v/v) methanol and continued to grow at 28 °C, 200 rpm for 24 h.

3.6. Flow Cytometry

For flow cytometry analysis [12], the P. pastoris cells were centrifuged at 3000× g for 1 min. The collected cells were washed twice by ice-cold water, resuspended and blocked in 1 mL of phosphate buffered saline (PBS, 137 mM NaCl, 10mM Na2HPO4·12 H2O, 2.7 mM KCl, 2 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.4) with 1 mg/mL BSA for 1 h at 4 °C with rotation. Then, 1 µL of mouse anti-HA tag monoclonal antibodies and 5 µg of CL7-sfGFP proteins were added to the cell suspension of 1000 µL and were incubated at room temperature with rotation for 2 h. The cells were then washed three times with PBS and resuspended in 200 µL of PBS with the addition of 1 µL of DyLight 649-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG(H+L) antibodies and were then incubated at room temperature with rotation for 1 h. At last, the cells were washed three times with PBS and suspended in 1mL of PBS. The yeast cells were examined using a flow cytometer (CytoFLEX, Beckman Coulter, Suzhou, China; Excitation wavelength, 488 nm and 638 nm; Emission wavelength, 525 nm and 660 nm) to estimate the percentage of the fluorescence positive cells.

3.7. Fluorescence Microscopy

For fluorescence microscopy analysis [12], cells of GS115/pPICZαA, GS115/pPICZαA HA-SED1 and GS115/pPICZαA HA-Im7-SED1 were washed and blocked as described above. The cells were resuspended in 1 mL of PBS and 1 µL of mouse anti-HA tag monoclonal antibodies as well as 5 µg of CL7-mCherry protein were added and incubated at room temperature with rotation for 2 h. The cells were washed three times with PBS and resuspended in 200 µL of PBS with the addition of 1 µL of FITC–conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG(H+L) antibodies and were then incubated at room temperature for 1 h with rotation. Finally, the cells were washed three times with PBS, resuspended in 1 mL of PBS and examined by a fluorescence microscopy (IX73, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

3.8. Blue Light Transmitter Analysis

For direct visualization of the yeast cell surface immobilized CL7-sfGFP proteins, a blue light transmitter with the wavelength from 440–485 nm (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) was used. The GS115/pPICZαA HA-SED1 and GS115/pPICZαA HA-Im7-SED1 cells were washed and blocked as described above. The cells were resuspended in 1 mL of PBS and 10 µg of CL7-sfGFP proteins were added to each cell suspension and were incubated at room temperature with rotation for 1 h. The cells were then washed five times with PBS and analyzed under the blue light transmitter.

3.9. Western Blotting Analysis

For Western blotting analysis [10], the cells of GS115/pPICZαA, GS115/pPICZαA HA-SED1 and GS115/pPICZαA HA-Im7-SED1 were washed twice by distilled water, adjusted to OD600 = 10 and boiled in SDS-PAGE buffer (10% SDS, 50% glycerol, 5% 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.5% bromophenol blue, 0.25 M Tris-HCl, pH6.8). The protein samples were fractionated by an 8% SDS-PAGE gel and electro-transferred onto a PVDF membrane. The PVDF membrane was blocked with 5% skimmed milk in Tris-buffered Saline Buffer containing 0.5% Tween 20 (TBST, 50 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, 0.5% Tween 20, pH 7.6) and incubated with mouse anti-HA monoclonal antibody (1:2000) in 5% skimmed milk in TBST for 1 h at room temperature and washed five times. The PVDF membrane was then incubated with HRP-conjugate goat anti-mouse IgG(H+L) antibody (1:2000) in 5% skimmed milk in TBST for 1 h at room temperature. The PVDF membrane was washed five times and the protein bands were visualized using a chemiluminescence detection reagent (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA).

3.10. Fluorometric Assay

For the quantification of yeast surface indirectly displayed CL7-sfGFP fusion proteins, the GS115/pPICZαA-HA-SED1 and GS115/pPICZαA-HA-Im7-SED1 cells were washed and blocked as described above. The fluorometric assay was performed as reported by Shibasaki et al. with some modifications [18], using the fluorescence spectrophotometer F-4600 (HITACHI, Tokyo, Japan). The excitation wavelength and emission wavelength of the CL7-sfGFP fusion proteins were determined by wavelength scanning. Then, 490 nm and 512 nm were chosen as the optimal excitation and emission wavelength, respectively. The fluorescence intensities of 0 µg, 1 µg, 2 µg, 3 µg, 4 µg, 5 µg, 6 µg, 7 µg, 8 µg, 9 µg and 10 µg of CL7-sfGFP fusion proteins in 1 mL of TBS were measured. The calibration curve was prepared with the fluorescence intensities of 4 µg to 10 µg of CL7-sfGFP fusion proteins (Figure 8).
Different amounts of CL7-sfGFP fusion proteins were added into 0.5 mL of the GS115/pPICZαA-HA-Im7-SED1 cells (Table 1). Then, 120 μg of CL7-sfGFP fusion proteins were also added into 0.5 mL of the GS115/pPICZαA-HA-SED1 cells. These cells were incubated at room temperature with rotation for 1 h and were then washed five times with TBS and resuspended in 1 mL of TBS. The GS115/pPICZαA-HA-Im7-SED1 and GS115/pPICZαA-HA-SED1 cells were diluted. Their fluorescence intensities and OD600 were examined and shown in Table 1. In addition, the fluorescence intensity/OD600 (F/A) values were analyzed with GraphPad Prism 5 and are given in Figure 9.

3.11. Human Arginase I Activity Assay

The bio-conversion of l-ornithine from l-Arginine by P. pastoris surface indirectly displayed human Arginase I was examined [16,17]. In a typical experiment, 0.5 mL of GS115/pPICZαA HA-Im7-SED1 cells of 20 OD600 displaying HA-Im7-SED1 fusion proteins was washed five times with bicarbonate buffer (100 mM, pH = 10). Excessive amounts of CL7-huArg I fusion proteins were added into each cell suspension and the cell suspensions were incubated with rotation at room temperature for 2 h. The cells were washed five times with bicarbonate buffer (100 mM, pH = 10) and resuspended in 0.5 mL of bicarbonate buffer (100 mM, pH = 10). The enzyme activity was examined at 40 °C for 10 min in 1 mL of reaction volume (bicarbonate buffer, 50 mM, pH 10; 1 mM MnCl2; 40 mM l-Arginine). The reactions were stopped by boiling at 100 °C for 5 min and the reaction solutions were centrifuged at 5000g for 2 min. Then, 100 μL of 1M TCA was added to 900 μL of the reaction supernatant and the concentration of l-ornithine was detected using the Chinard colorimetric assay [16].

4. Conclusions and Perspective

In conclusion, we established a novel highly efficient indirect P. pastoris surface display system using the ultra-high-affinity interaction between Im7 and CL7 in this study. The Im7-SED1 fusion proteins were successfully expressed on the yeast surfaces. The interaction of surface displayed Im7 proteins with CL7 fusion proteins was confirmed by the blue light transmitter, flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy. Generally, ~2.8 × 106 CL7-sfGFP fusion protein molecules per cell were displayed indirectly by P. pastoris, which was examined and calculated by fluorometric assays. The bio-conversion of l-ornithine from l-Arginine by free and P. pastoris surface displayed human Arginase I was examined, indicating that the enzymes can be efficiently displayed on the cell surface by this method. In future, this efficient surface display system can be further applied as a robust platform for the development of vaccine, bio-sensor, electrochemical devices and bio-catalysts.

Author Contributions

L.M. and Y.L. contributed to the conception and design of the work; The literature search, E. coli protein expression plasmid construction, yeast surface display vector and recombinant yeast strain construction, quantification of yeast surface immobilized proteins, yeast surface immobilization and enzyme activity analysis of human arginase I, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript writing were done by S.L. E. coli protein expression, cytometric analysis, data collection and analysis were done by J.Q. Fluorescence microscopy, blue light transmitter analysis and Western Blotting were done by S.L. Final approval of the version of this manuscript to be published was done by Y.L.

Funding

This work was partially supported by a grant from the Key Technical Innovation Foundation of Hubei Province (No. 2017ACA174 to L.M.), National Foundation of Hubei Province (No. 201700963 to Y.L.) and Joint Open Fund of National Biopesticide Engineering Research Centre and Scientific Observation and Experimental Station of Utilization of microbial resources (Central China), as well as the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (No. JF-NBCOES-1807).

Conflicts of Interest

Yi Liu and Lixin Ma have applied a provisional patent on the indirect display of enzymes on yeast cell surface which was partly presented in this manuscript. The remaining authors have declared no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sheehan, J.; Marasco, W.A. Phage and Yeast Display. Microbiol. Spectr. 2015, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, H.; Wang, Y.; Yang, R. Recent progress in Bacillus subtilis spore-surface display: Concept, progress, and future. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 101, 933–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Van Bloois, E.; Winter, R.T.; Kolmar, H.; Fraaije, M.W. Decorating microbes: Surface display of proteins on Escherichia coli. Trends Biotechnol. 2011, 29, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. King, D.J.; Bowers, P.M.; Kehry, M.R.; Horlick, R.A. Mammalian cell display and somatic hypermutation in vitro for human antibody discovery. Curr. Drug Dis. Technol. 2014, 11, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pepper, L.R.; Cho, Y.K.; Boder, E.T.; Shusta, E.V. A decade of yeast surface display technology: Where are we now? Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 2008, 11, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Andreu, C.; Del Olmo, M.L. Yeast arming systems: Pros and cons of different protein anchors and other elements required for display. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 2543–2561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lei, H.; Jin, S.; Karlsson, E.; Schultz-Cherry, S.; Ye, K. Yeast Surface-Displayed H5N1 Avian Influenza Vaccines. J. Immunol. Res. 2016, 2016, 4131324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Schroter, C.; Krah, S.; Beck, J.; Konning, D.; Grzeschik, J.; Valldorf, B.; Zielonka, S.; Kolmar, H. Isolation of pH-Sensitive Antibody Fragments by Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting and Yeast Surface Display. Methods Mol. Biol. 2018, 1685, 311–331. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Han, L.; Zhao, Y.; Cui, S.; Liang, B. Redesigning of Microbial Cell Surface and Its Application to Whole-Cell Biocatalysis and Biosensors. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2018, 185, 396–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Tanaka, T.; Masunari, S.; Ishii, J.; Wakamura, K.; Segawa, M.; Fukuda, H.; Kondo, A. Displaying non-natural, functional molecules on yeast surfaces via biotin-streptavidin interaction. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 145, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Vassylyeva, M.N.; Klyuyev, S.; Vassylyev, A.D.; Wesson, H.; Zhang, Z.; Renfrow, M.B.; Wang, H.; Higgins, N.P.; Chow, L.T.; Vassylyev, D.G. Efficient, ultra-high-affinity chromatography in a one-step purification of complex proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E5138–E5147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Su, G.D.; Zhang, X.; Lin, Y. Surface display of active lipase in Pichia pastoris using Sed1 as an anchor protein. Biotechnol. Lett. 2010, 32, 1131–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhang, Z.; Tang, R.; Zhu, D.; Wang, W.; Yi, L.; Ma, L. Non-peptide guided auto-secretion of recombinant proteins by super-folder green fluorescent protein in Escherichia coli. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 6990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Liang, X.X.; Wang, B.B.; Sun, Y.F.; Lin, Y.; Han, S.Y.; Zheng, S.P.; Cui, T.B. Quantitative evaluation of Candia antarctica lipase B displayed on the cell surface of a Pichia pastoris based on an FS anchor system. Biotechnol. Lett. 2013, 35, 367–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Paus, E.J.; Willey, J.; Ridge, R.J.; Legg, C.R.; Finkelman, M.A.; Novitsky, T.J.; Ketchum, P.A. Production of recombinant endotoxin neutralizing protein in Pichia pastoris and methods for its purification. Protein Exp. Purif. 2002, 26, 202–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chinard, F.P. Photometric estimation of proline and ornithine. J. Biol. Chem. 1952, 199, 91–95. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Zhang, X.; Liu, J.; Yu, X.; Wang, F.; Yi, L.; Li, Z.; Liu, Y.; Ma, L. High-level expression of human arginase I in Pichia pastoris and its immobilization on chitosan to produce L-ornithine. BMC Biotechnol. 2015, 15, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Shibasaki, S.; Ueda, M.; Iizuka, T.; Hirayama, M.; Ikeda, Y.; Kamasawa, N.; Osumi, M.; Tanaka, A. Quantitative evaluation of the enhanced green fluorescent protein displayed on the cell surface of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by fluorometric and confocal laser scanning microscopic analyses. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2001, 55, 471–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are available upon requested from the corresponding authors.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the indirect P. pastoris surface display system through the ultra-high-affinity interaction between Im7 and CL7. The Im7-SED1 fusion proteins are expressed and displayed on the surface of P. pastoris cells. The addition of CL7 tagged proteins leads to the indirect display of target proteins.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the indirect P. pastoris surface display system through the ultra-high-affinity interaction between Im7 and CL7. The Im7-SED1 fusion proteins are expressed and displayed on the surface of P. pastoris cells. The addition of CL7 tagged proteins leads to the indirect display of target proteins.
Molecules 24 01483 g001
Figure 2. Schemes for the construction of plasmids including (A) pET23a-CL7-sfGFP, pET23a-CL7-mCherry, pET23a-CL7-huArg I; (B) pPICZαA-HA-SED1; and (C) pPICZαA-HA-Im7-SED1.
Figure 2. Schemes for the construction of plasmids including (A) pET23a-CL7-sfGFP, pET23a-CL7-mCherry, pET23a-CL7-huArg I; (B) pPICZαA-HA-SED1; and (C) pPICZαA-HA-Im7-SED1.
Molecules 24 01483 g002aMolecules 24 01483 g002b
Figure 3. SDS-PAGE analysis of the (A) CL7-sfGFP, (B) CL7-mCherry and (C) CL7-huArg I fusion proteins purified by Ni-NTA. M: protein ladder (Thermo Scientific, Product# 26616); Lane 1: E. coli cells without IPTG (Isopropyl β-d-Thiogalactoside); Lane 2: E. coli cells induced with 1 mM IPTG; Lane 3: supernatant after sonication; Lane 4: debris after centrifugation; Lane 5: flow-through of supernatant after binding with Ni2+-resin; Lane 6: flow-through of Ni2+-resin washed with 20 mM imidazole; Lane 7 to Lane 10: elution of 4mL TBS (tris-buffered saline) containing 50 mM, 100 mM, 150 mM and 200 mM imidazole, respectively; Lane 11: the resin resuspended in 4 mL TBS.
Figure 3. SDS-PAGE analysis of the (A) CL7-sfGFP, (B) CL7-mCherry and (C) CL7-huArg I fusion proteins purified by Ni-NTA. M: protein ladder (Thermo Scientific, Product# 26616); Lane 1: E. coli cells without IPTG (Isopropyl β-d-Thiogalactoside); Lane 2: E. coli cells induced with 1 mM IPTG; Lane 3: supernatant after sonication; Lane 4: debris after centrifugation; Lane 5: flow-through of supernatant after binding with Ni2+-resin; Lane 6: flow-through of Ni2+-resin washed with 20 mM imidazole; Lane 7 to Lane 10: elution of 4mL TBS (tris-buffered saline) containing 50 mM, 100 mM, 150 mM and 200 mM imidazole, respectively; Lane 11: the resin resuspended in 4 mL TBS.
Molecules 24 01483 g003
Figure 4. Flow cytometry analysis of P. pastoris cells including (A) unlabeled GS115/pPICZαA, (B) GS115/pPICZαA, (C) GS115/pPICZαA HA-SED1 and (D) GS115/pPICZαA HA-Im7-SED1. All the cells except (A) were treated with DyLight 649-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG(H+L) antibodies (top line) and with CL7-sfGFP and mouse anti-HA tag monoclonal antibodies (bottom line).
Figure 4. Flow cytometry analysis of P. pastoris cells including (A) unlabeled GS115/pPICZαA, (B) GS115/pPICZαA, (C) GS115/pPICZαA HA-SED1 and (D) GS115/pPICZαA HA-Im7-SED1. All the cells except (A) were treated with DyLight 649-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG(H+L) antibodies (top line) and with CL7-sfGFP and mouse anti-HA tag monoclonal antibodies (bottom line).
Molecules 24 01483 g004
Figure 5. Fluorescence microscopy analysis of P. pastoris yeast cells including GS115/pPICZαA (first line), GS115/pPICZαA HA-SED1 (second line) and GS115/pPICZαA HA-Im7-SED1 (third line). All the cells were treated with (middle row) mouse anti-HA tag monoclonal antibodies together with FITC (fluorescein isothiocyanate)-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L) antibodies and with CL7-mCherry (right row).
Figure 5. Fluorescence microscopy analysis of P. pastoris yeast cells including GS115/pPICZαA (first line), GS115/pPICZαA HA-SED1 (second line) and GS115/pPICZαA HA-Im7-SED1 (third line). All the cells were treated with (middle row) mouse anti-HA tag monoclonal antibodies together with FITC (fluorescein isothiocyanate)-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L) antibodies and with CL7-mCherry (right row).
Molecules 24 01483 g005
Figure 6. (a) The western-blot analysis indicated that the HA-Im7-SED1 and HA-SED1 fusion proteins were displayed on the surface of P. pastoris cells. (b) The blue light transmitter analysis showed that CL7-sfGFP proteins were indirectly immobilized on the surface of P. pastoris cells.
Figure 6. (a) The western-blot analysis indicated that the HA-Im7-SED1 and HA-SED1 fusion proteins were displayed on the surface of P. pastoris cells. (b) The blue light transmitter analysis showed that CL7-sfGFP proteins were indirectly immobilized on the surface of P. pastoris cells.
Molecules 24 01483 g006
Figure 7. Scanning the (A) excitation wavelength and (B) emission wavelength of CL7-sfGFP in TBS buffer (pH 7.6).
Figure 7. Scanning the (A) excitation wavelength and (B) emission wavelength of CL7-sfGFP in TBS buffer (pH 7.6).
Molecules 24 01483 g007
Figure 8. The calibration curve and linear regression equation of the CL7-sfGFP fusion proteins in TBS buffer (pH 7.6).
Figure 8. The calibration curve and linear regression equation of the CL7-sfGFP fusion proteins in TBS buffer (pH 7.6).
Molecules 24 01483 g008
Figure 9. The fluorescence intensity/OD600 (F/A) values of yeast cells incubated with different amounts (μg) of CL7-sfGFP.
Figure 9. The fluorescence intensity/OD600 (F/A) values of yeast cells incubated with different amounts (μg) of CL7-sfGFP.
Molecules 24 01483 g009
Figure 10. The calibration curve of l-ornithine.
Figure 10. The calibration curve of l-ornithine.
Molecules 24 01483 g010
Table 1. Recovery efficiency of CL7 fusion protein purified by Ni2+-affinity chromatography.
Table 1. Recovery efficiency of CL7 fusion protein purified by Ni2+-affinity chromatography.
ProteinSupernatant50 mM100 mM150 mM200 mM
CL7-sfGFP100%11.4%20.9%12.0%6.3%
CL7-mCherry100%4.1%12.9%7.6%5.3%
CL7-huArg I100%*10.8%19.7%8.4%
* The band intensity was too low to be detected.
Table 2. The fluorescence intensity/OD600 (F/A) of sf-GFP on the yeast surface.
Table 2. The fluorescence intensity/OD600 (F/A) of sf-GFP on the yeast surface.
CellsGS115/pPICZα-HA-SED1GS115/pPICZα-HA-Im7-SED1
Protein Quantity (μg)012060100
Fluorescence Intensity/OD6000.012 (± 0.0039)0.017 (± 0.0054)0.91 (± 0.063)0.88 (± 0.075)
Table 3. The primers used for the construction of plasmids including pET23a-CL7-sfGFP, pET23a-CL7-mCherry and pET23a-CL7-huArg I.
Table 3. The primers used for the construction of plasmids including pET23a-CL7-sfGFP, pET23a-CL7-mCherry and pET23a-CL7-huArg I.
PrimerSequence (5′→3′)
CL7Fgaaggagatatacatatgagcaaaagcaatgaaccgggtaaag
CL7Rtccaccacctgaaccacctcctccgccttcaatatcaatgttgcgtttcg
GS3CFggaggaggtggttcaggtggtggaggcagtttggaggttttgttccagggtccagctag
sfGFPFgaggttttgttccagggtccagctagcgtgagcaagggcgaggagctgttc
sfGFPRggtggtggtggtggtgctcgagttccttgtacagctcgtccatgcc
mCherryFgaggttttgttccagggtccagctagcatggttagcaaaggggaggaggataac
mCherryRggtggtggtggtggtgctcgagttccttgtacagctcgtccataccgc
huArgIFgaggttttgttccagggtccagctagcagtgctaagtccagaacgattggtattattg3′
huArgIRggtggtggtggtggtgctcgagctttggtgggttcaaatagtcaattggt
Table 4. The primers used for the construction of plasmids pPICZαA-HA-SED1 and pPICZαA-HA-Im7-SED1.
Table 4. The primers used for the construction of plasmids pPICZαA-HA-SED1 and pPICZαA-HA-Im7-SED1.
PrimerSequence (5′→3′)
SED1Faggcggtagcggaggcggagggtcgcaattttccaacagtacatctgcttcttcc
SED1Rgaaagctggcggccgccgcggtcattataagaataacatagcaacaccagccaaac
ZαHAFaaagagaggctgaagctgaattctacccatacgacgttccagactacgctggaggctct
HA-MCSFcgttccagactacgctggaggctctgctagccatatggttaacgggcc
MCS-GSFtgctagccatatggttaacgggcccggaggcggtagcggaggcggagggtc
Im7Fctacgctggaggctctgctagcatggaattgaagaactccatctccgact
Im7Rctccgctaccgcctccgggcccaccttgtttaaaacctggcttaccgttg

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, S.; Qiao, J.; Lin, S.; Liu, Y.; Ma, L. A Highly Efficient Indirect P. pastoris Surface Display Method Based on the CL7/Im7 Ultra-High-Affinity System. Molecules 2019, 24, 1483. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24081483

AMA Style

Li S, Qiao J, Lin S, Liu Y, Ma L. A Highly Efficient Indirect P. pastoris Surface Display Method Based on the CL7/Im7 Ultra-High-Affinity System. Molecules. 2019; 24(8):1483. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24081483

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Shuntang, Jie Qiao, Siyu Lin, Yi Liu, and Lixin Ma. 2019. "A Highly Efficient Indirect P. pastoris Surface Display Method Based on the CL7/Im7 Ultra-High-Affinity System" Molecules 24, no. 8: 1483. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24081483

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop