Next Article in Journal
Role of Natural Products in Modulating Histone Deacetylases in Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Phenolic Compounds Inhibit 3T3-L1 Adipogenesis Depending on the Stage of Differentiation and Their Binding Affinity to PPARγ
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 24
Issue 6
10.3390/molecules24061046
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Bacillus velezensis: A Valuable Member of Bioactive Molecules within Plant Microbiomes

by
Muhammad Fazle Rabbee
1,†,
Md. Sarafat Ali
1,†,
Jinhee Choi
1,
Buyng Su Hwang
2,
Sang Chul Jeong
2 and
Kwang-hyun Baek
1,*
1
Department of Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Gyeongbuk, Korea
2
Nakdonggang National Institute of Biological Resources, Sangju 37242, Gyeongbuk, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2019, 24(6), 1046; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24061046
Submission received: 19 February 2019 / Revised: 8 March 2019 / Accepted: 12 March 2019 / Published: 16 March 2019
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Bacillus velezensis is an aerobic, gram-positive, endospore-forming bacterium that promotes plant growth. Numerous strains of this species have been reported to suppress the growth of microbial pathogens, including bacteria, fungi, and nematodes. Based on recent phylogenetic analysis, several Bacillus species have been reclassified as B. velezensis. However, this information has yet to be integrated into a well-organized resource. Genomic analysis has revealed that B. velezensis possesses strain-specific clusters of genes related to the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, which play significant roles in both pathogen suppression and plant growth promotion. More specifically, B. velezensis exhibits a high genetic capacity for synthesizing cyclic lipopeptides (i.e., surfactin, bacillomycin-D, fengycin, and bacillibactin) and polyketides (i.e., macrolactin, bacillaene, and difficidin). Secondary metabolites produced by B. velezensis can also trigger induced systemic resistance in plants, a process by which plants defend themselves against recurrent attacks by virulent microorganisms. This is the first study to integrate previously published information about the Bacillus species, newly reclassified as B. velezensis, and their beneficial metabolites (i.e., siderophore, bacteriocins, and volatile organic compounds).

1. Introduction

Rhizosphere is a highly competitive environment, where microorganisms constantly battle for resources to survive [1]. The term rhizosphere was first coined by Lorentz Hiltner in 1904 [2] to describe the nutrient-rich zone of soil (usually 1–3 mm around roots), where plant root exudates facilitate colonization by microbial communities [1,3]. Some such rhizosphere-associated bacteria, i.e., plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), are recognized for their ability to promote plant weight and crop yield [4], by (1) producing antimicrobial secondary metabolites (i.e., antagonism), (2) competing for niches and nutrients (i.e., colonization), and (3) stimulating induced systemic resistance (ISR) [5].
Bacillus species are considered important PGPR, producing a vast array of biologically active secondary metabolites that can potentially inhibit the growth of plant pathogens and deleterious rhizospheric microorganisms [5]. Bacillus spp. are preferred in agricultural systems, due to their ability to form endospores, which can survive to heat exposure and desiccation, and capacity to be formulated into stable dry powders with long shelf lives [6]. Furthermore, because Bacillus spp. are already common inhabitants of plant root microflora, Bacillus spore-based biocontrol agents have little, if any, effect on the composition of the plant root microbial communities [7]. Several Bacillus-based products are now commercially available, including RhizoVital® (Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42; ABiTEP, GmbH, Berlin, Germany), Amylo-X® WG (B. amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum D747; Certis Europe BV, Netherlands), RhizoPlus® (B. subtilis FZB24; ABiTEP), Sonata® (B. pumilus QST2808; AgraQuest, Inc., Davis, California, USA), Taegro® (B. subtilis var. amyloliquefaciens FZB24; Novozymes Biologicals, Inc., Salem, Virginia, USA [8].
Recently, different strains of B. velezensis, which is a typical PGPR, have received considerable attention. For example, living spores of B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42, now reclassified as a strain of B. velezensis, have been formulated into the commercially available bio-inoculant RhizoVital®, which is used to control a variety of soil-borne diseases [9]. The strain is capable of stimulating plant growth and producing different types of biologically active secondary metabolites that suppress plant pathogenic microflora [10]. Meanwhile, B. velezensis has been formulated into the commercially available fungicide Botrybel (Agricaldes, Spain), owing to its activity against Botrytis cinerea, the etiological agent of gray mold, which reportedly infects over 200 plant species worldwide [11].

2. Emergence of B. velezensis from the B. subtilis Species Complex

Bacillus is a large and heterogeneous collection of aerobic or facultatively anaerobic, rod-shaped, endospore-forming bacteria that are widely distributed throughout the environment. B. subtilis, B. licheniformis, and B. pumilus have been identified as the ‘original members’ of the genus Bacillus [12] (Figure 1). In 1943, Fukumoto first isolated B. amyloliquefaciens, a bacterium that produces liquefying amylase from soil [13]. Later, B. amyloliquefaciens was combined with the closely related B. licheniformis, B. pumilus, and B. subtilis into the ‘B. subtilis species complex’, based on phylogenetic and phenetic evidence [14]. This classification was done based on the highly conserved nature of the protein-encoding sequences in B. subtilis species complex [15]. For many years, these closely related species were difficult to classify using classic taxonomical parameters such as morphology, physiological characteristics, guanine-cytosine content, and phylogenetic analysis through 16S rRNA gene sequencing.
B. velezensis (strain CR-502T and strain CR-14b) was first isolated from environmental samples taken from the mouth of the Vélez River at Torredelmar in the province of Málaga, Spain [16]. Phenotypic tests and phylogenetic analyses indicated that the strains were members of the genus Bacillus and closely related to B. subtilis and B. amyloliquefaciens. Further DNA–DNA hybridization experiments revealed that the novel strains possessed less than 20% similarity with other Bacillus species and, therefore, represented a distinct species of Bacillus [16] (Figure 1).
Meanwhile, B. siamensis (strain PD-A10T) was first isolated from the salted crab (poo-khem) in Thailand [17]. As found in B. velezensis, phenotypic and chemotaxonomic analyses indicated that the novel strain was a member of the genus Bacillus (Figure 1), and the 16S rRNA gene sequence of the strain PD-A10T was similar to those of both B. amyloliquefaciens NBRC 15535T (99.5%) and B. subtilis DSM10T (99.4%) [17].
B. methylotrophicus (strain KACC 13105T) was isolated from rice rhizospheric soil in Korea [18]. The strain was capable of utilizing methanol, trimethylamine, and ethanol as carbon sources, and was closely related to members of the B. subtilis species complex, with 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity values ranging from 98.2 to 99.2% [18].
In 2011, B. amyloliquefaciens strains were divided among the subspecies B. amyloliquefaciens subsp. amyloliquefaciens and B. amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum, based on complete genome analysis [19]. Strains of B. amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum are plant-associated and typically used as biological control agents and/or plant growth promoters [20]. Furthermore, comparative genomic analysis of B. amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum and B. methylotrophicus indicated that the genomes were highly similar (95%), with only minor differences within their genomic sequences [21]. Therefore, B. amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum was synonymized with B. methylotrophicus [21] (Figure 1), and successively, B. methylotrophicus was synonymized with B. velezensis, owing to the high phenotypic and genotypic coherence of the taxa [22].
The taxonomic statuses of 66 closely related B. amyloliquefaciens strains were assessed by comparing complete RNA polymerase beta-subunit (rpoB) sequences and core genome sequences [23]. The strains were clustered into a single clade, i.e., the “B. amyloliquefaciens operational group”, which contains three tightly linked branches: (1) B. amyloliquefaciens subsp. amyloliquefaciens, (2) B. siamensis, and (3) B. velezensis, a taxon that includes all the strains previously classified as B. velezensis, B. methylotrophicus, and B. amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum (Figure 1).
This review focuses on B. velezensis, which includes a variety of previously reported strains, namely, B. amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum FZB42 [22], B. amyloliquefaciens FR203A [24], B. amyloliquefaciens SQR9 [25], B. amyloliquefaciens NJN-6 [26], B. amyloliquefaciens SQRT3 [27], B. methylotrophicus KACC 13105T [22], B. velezensis CR-502T and CR-14b [16], and B. subtilis GB03 [28]. Based on rpoB gene analysis and other analyses, these taxa are synonymous with B. velezensis and are each capable of suppressing pathogens. A phylogenetic tree inferred from the type strains of species from the “B. subtilis species complex” is presented in Figure 2. According to phylogenomic analysis, Bacillus species synonymous with B. velezensis were clustered into clades consisting of B. amyloliquefaciens, B. amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum, and B. methylotrophicus.

3. Bioactive Molecules Synthesized by B. velezensis

In 2007, B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42 was reported as the first gram-positive biocontrol bacteria to have its genome sequenced [15]. The strain harbors an array of nine giant gene clusters that function to produce a spectrum of bioactive secondary metabolites (Figure 3) by modularly organized mega-enzymes, known as nonribosomal peptide synthetases and polyketide synthases (Table 1). Five of these nine gene clusters (i.e., srf, bmy, fen, nrs, and dhb; 137 kb) are involved in synthesizing cyclic lipopeptides molecules, such as surfactin, bacillomycin-D, fengycin, an unknown peptide, and the iron-siderophore bacillibactin. Meanwhile, three other gene clusters (i.e., mln, bae, and dfn; 199 kb) were reported to direct the synthesis of antibacterial polyketides, such as macrolactin, bacillaene, and difficidin, and the last gene cluster (bac; 6.9 kb) was reported to direct the synthesis and export of the antibacterial dipeptide bacilysin [29]. Altogether, about 10% (340 kb) of the B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42 genome is dedicated to the nonribosomal synthesis of lipopeptide and polyketide-type antimicrobial molecules, siderophores, and bacteriocins [29]. Closely related Bacillus species are also capable of synthesizing bioactive metabolites that exhibit activity against a wide range of microorganisms (Table 2).

3.1. Antibacterial Molecules

Difficidin and bacilysin are the most effective antibacterial agents produced by B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42 [7]. Little is known about the antibacterial properties of macrolactin and bacillaene [30]. B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42 exerts biocontrol activity by synthesizing difficidin and bacilysin, which facilitates the control of several economically important rice diseases, such as bacterial blight and bacterial leaf streak, which are caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae and X. oryzae pv. oryzicola, respectively [7]. Erwinia amylovora, the causative agent of fire blight disease, can also be effectively controlled by B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42 [31]. However, a mutant strain of B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42 that produces difficidin, but not macrolactin or bacillaene, was reported to exhibit equal or slightly higher activity against E. amylovora than the wild-type FZB42 strain. Bacilysin, one of the antibacterial molecules produced by B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42, is reported to exert an inhibitory effect against E. amylovora [31]. Bacilysin, also possesses anticyanobacterial activity against the harmful alga Microcystis aeruginosa, with a killing rate of 98.78%, and can, therefore, be used as a targeted biocontrol agent [32]. Meanwhile, bacillomycin-D and fengycin from B. velezensis might play redundant roles in defense mechanisms against Ralstonia solanacearum, an etiological agent of tomato wilting [33]. The expression of lipopeptide biosynthesis genes (srfAB, ituC, and fenD for the synthesis of surfactin, iturin, and fengycin, respectively) was greatly induced in co-cultures of B. velezensis and pathogens, such as R. solanacearum [33].
Bacteriocins are ribosomally synthesized peptidic toxins that are synthesized by bacteria. In the plant rhizosphere, such toxins may be produced to kill neighboring pathogenic microbes and nematodes, usually in response to environmental stresses [34,35]. The first known bacteriocin, colicin, was isolated from Escherichia coli by Gratia in 1925 [36]. Recent genomic analysis of B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42 revealed ribosomally encoded gene clusters for plantazolicin, a novel antibacterial and nematicidal agent [37], and amylocyclicin, an antibiotic (Table 1) [38]. Plantazolicin is synthesized by a cluster of 12 genes, which span nearly 10 kb of the B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42 genome [37], and amylocyclicin is a highly hydrophobic cyclic peptide that is synthesized by a cluster of six genes, which span nearly 4.5 kb, and are involved in the compound’s production, modification, exportation, and self-immunization [38].

3.2. Antifungal Molecules

The inoculation of lettuce seeds with commercial B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42 can reduce the severity of bottom rot disease caused by Rhizoctonia solani [20]. Ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry suggested that this suppression might be due to the presence of cyclic lipopeptide molecules (i.e., surfactin, bacillomycin-D, and fengycin) in the lettuce root rhizosphere [20].
B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42 has been reported to exhibit antagonistic interactions with Fusarium graminearum, a plant-pathogenic fungus that threatens the production and quality of wheat and barley worldwide [39]. The antifungal activity exerted by B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42 has primarily been attributed to the nonribosomal synthesis of lipopeptide compounds [40]. For example, a bacillomycin-D deficient mutant strain of B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42 exhibited severely impaired antifungal activities, thereby suggesting that bacillomycin-D contributes significantly to the antifungal action of B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42 [29]. A double mutant of B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42 that was deficient in both bacillomycin-D and fengycin (ΔbmyA ΔfenA) was heavily impaired in its ability to inhibit the growth of F. oxysporum, thereby indicating synergistic effects among such lipopeptides against target organisms [41]. Bacillomycin-D also induces morphological changes in the plasma membranes and cell walls of F. graminearum hyphae and conidia [39].

3.3. Nematocidal Molecules

Plant-parasitic nematodes cause serious damage to many commercially important crops throughout the world [42]. Rhizospheric microorganisms control parasitic nematodes by secreting a variety of metabolites, enzymes, and toxins that suppress nematode reproduction, hatching, and juvenile survival [43]. A variety of nematophagous microbes, including Bacillus spp., have been reported to possess nematicidal activity [44,45]. For example, treating tomato seedlings with B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42 reduced numbers of nematode eggs in tomato roots and of juvenile worms in soil and suppressed the incidence of tomato plant galls [44]. The nematicidal effect exerted by strain FZB42 has been attributed to plantazolicin, a novel compound encoded by the pzn gene cluster [45]. Culture filtrates of B. amyloliquefaciens FR203A have also been used as biocontrol agents for control of the nematode Xiphinema index, a pest of grape crops in Chile [24].

3.4. Siderophore Production

Iron is essential for growth in all living organisms, and most organisms depend on iron as a cofactor for important biochemical processes, including oxygen binding, electron transport, and catalysis [46]. In B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42, nonribosomal peptide synthetases are involved in the synthesis of siderophore bacillibactin [15], which play an important role in facilitating the acquisition of ferric ions (Fe3+) from minerals and organic compounds in the rhizosphere [46]. The binding of siderophores with environmentally free ferric ion facilitates the formation of siderophore–iron complexes that are transported back into bacterial cells through specific receptors (i.e., siderophore binding proteins) in the cell membrane. In gram-positive bacteria, siderophore-binding proteins, siderophore-permeases, and ATPases are involved in the transport of siderophore–iron complexes into the cytoplasm [46], where the ferric ions are reduced to ferrous (Fe2+) ions, thereby becoming available for microbial growth [47]. Rhizospheric B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42, which produces high concentrations of the siderophore bacillibactin, inhibits the growth of phytopathogenic bacterial and fungal competitors by depriving them of essential iron ions [15].

3.5. Production of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)

VOCs are a complex mixture of low-molecular-weight, odorous, lipophilic compounds that are usually produced by plants and microorganisms [48]. Plant- and soil-associated microorganisms that produce VOCs have been reported to suppress virulent microbes, thereby indicating their potential as biocontrol agents against plant diseases [49]. Indeed, the VOCs released by B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42 possess antimicrobial activity and also promote plant growth and systemic resistance [50], whereas the VOCs, acetoin, and 2,3- butanediol, in particular, released by B. subtilis GB03 stimulate ISR in Arabidopsis seedlings and reduce the severity of disease in seedlings challenged with the soft rot pathogen E. carotovora subsp. carotovora [28,51].
The VOCs produced by B. amyloliquefaciens NJN-6 also inhibit fungal growth by suppressing mycelial growth and spore germination in F. oxysporum [26]. In fact, F. oxysporum growth was inhibited by approximately 30–40% [26]. In a similar study, a combination of 22 VOCs produced by B. amyloliquefaciens SQR9 were found to inhibit the growth of the tomato wilt pathogen R. solanacearum by 70% [52], and proteomic analysis indicated that the VOCs also affected pathogen virulence by downregulating catalase and superoxide dismutase activities. The SQR9 VOCs also reduced motility, biofilm formation, tomato root colonization by R. solanacearum, thereby clearly demonstrating the importance of VOCs in controlling pathogenic microbes [52].

4. Stimulation of Induced Systemic Resistance (ISR) by B. velezensis

The application of PGPR to seeds or seedlings can stimulate ISR in the treated plants upon recognition of pathogens (Figure 4). The term ISR was first coined by van Peer et al. [62] to describe the resistance of carnation plants, in which the root had been previously treated with the rhizobacterium Pseudomonas WCS417r, against F. oxysporum f. sp. dianthi. The process of ISR depends on the recognition of PGPR-secreted elicitors, such as lipopolysaccharides, peptidoglycans, flagellin, quorum-sensing molecules, cyclic lipopeptides, and iron chelating siderophores [63,64].
It is now recognized that PGPR induce ISR in plants through the jasmonic acid/ethylene (JA/ET) signaling pathways [5,65] (Figure 4) and that the cellular defense responses of plants include oxidative bursts, cell-wall reinforcement, the accumulation of defense-related enzymes, and the production of antimicrobial phytoalexins [66]. The well-characterized JA/ET responsive genes of Arabidopsis include LOX (lipoxygenase), VSP (vegetative storage protein), PDF1.2 (plant defensin factor 1.2), Hel (hevein), CHI (chitinase), and PAL (phenylalanine ammonia lyase) [67]. Interactions between PGPR and host plants can also activate both the JA/ET and salicylic acid signaling pathways, which are intertwined molecularly through their reliance on a functional version of NPR1 (non-expressor of PR1), a gene that encodes a defense-related regulatory protein (Figure 4). For example, the PGPR B. cereus AR156 induces the simultaneous expression of the JA/ET-responsive marker gene PDF1.2 and the salicylic acid-responsive marker genes PR1, PR2, and PR5 in the leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana when exposed to the pathogen P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 [68].
Surfactin and other nonribosomally synthesized secondary metabolites that are produced by B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42 have been reported to enhance plant defense responses in the root rhizosphere [20]. To examine the role of surfactin in the regulation of plant defense responses against R. solani, lettuce seedlings were bacterized with B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42 and two mutant strains of B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42, namely, CH1 (surfactin deficient) and CH5 (lipopeptide and polyketide deficient). Quantitative real-time PCR analysis indicated that PDF1.2 was upregulated in the FZB42-bacterized plants in presence of R. solani but not in plants bacterized with the mutant strains [20].
In another study, a soil drench that contained both B. amyloliquefaciens SQRT3 and the pathogen R. solanacearum upregulated the expression of several defense-related marker genes (i.e., Pin2, PR-1a, and Osmotin-like) in tomato leaves over that observed in the control plants (drenched with R. solanacearum only). B. amyloliquefaciens SQRT3-mediated ISR was also reported to involve JA, salicylic acid, and ET-dependent signaling pathways and to reduce tomato bacterial wilt by 68.1% [27].

5. Biofilm Formation by B. velezensis

In the rhizosphere, plants create environments that are nutritionally and physicochemically beneficial for root microflora by continuously releasing a variety of organic molecules. Some of these molecules function as chemical signals that attract motile bacteria to move towards the root surface (i.e., chemotaxis), thereby favoring the formation of biofilms [5], which are aggregations of cells that live on either liquid or solid surfaces in a sticky, self-produced matrix of hydrated extracellular polymeric substances. Such extracellular polymeric substances are composed of polysaccharides, proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids and mainly function to facilitate cell stability, adhesion, cohesion, interconnection, and transient immobilization of cells in a biofilm [69].
The formation of biofilms in plant rhizospheres can promote plant growth and protect plants from infectious microbes, both through the secretion of antimicrobial compounds and through systemic resistance. For example, when A. thaliana is infected with P. syringae, the plant secretes malic acid in order to recruit rhizospheric bacteria and, consequently, to enhance Bacillus biofilm formation, thereby promoting immunity against phytopathogenic microbes [70]. The formation of biofilm by B. amyloliquefaciens SQR9 in liquid culture could be regulated by maize root exudates that contained glucose, citric acid, and fumaric acid, and transcriptional profiling of the SQR9 strain revealed that the maize root exudates activated the expression of genes related to extracellular matrix production. Several genes related to fengycin, bacillibactin, and bacilysin synthesis were also upregulated as a result of biofilm formation, thereby providing further evidence of the beneficial role of SQR9 in the maize rhizosphere [25]. As the global transcription regulator, AbrB has been shown to negatively regulate chemotaxis and biofilm formation in Bacillus [25], and the disruption of abrB in B. amyloliquefaciens SQR9 was reported to significantly increase biofilm formation and biocontrol ability [71]. When compared with control seedlings, symptoms of Fusarium wilt were reduced to 50% in B. amyloliquefaciens SQR9-treated cucumber seedlings, and to as low as 20% in seedlings that had been treated with the abrB mutant of B. amyloliquefaciens SQR9 [71].
These results suggest that B. velezensis can also reduce the severity of plant diseases by forming biofilms and that the disease-controlling capacity of the strain can be improved by deleting genes that negatively regulate chemotaxis and biofilm formation.

6. Conclusions and Future Prospects

Increased use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides has resulted in the accumulation of residual chemical compounds in the environment, and pathogenic microorganisms are starting to develop resistance. To circumvent these undesirable effects, it is of utmost importance to use biological agents, such as bio-fertilizers and bio-pesticides. Among the closely related Bacillus species, B. velezensis is attracting attention as a valuable biocontrol agent. Accordingly, in order to develop and formulate bio-based products, it is increasingly important to understand the antimicrobial potential of biosynthesis of B. velezensis. Furthermore, the elucidation of genes responsible for bioactive secondary metabolites and the ability to control such genes are additional important steps for increasing the production of metabolites by beneficial microbes and for facilitating metabolic engineering. B. velezensis may represent a practical and powerful biocontrol agent that can be used as an effective alternative to synthetic agro-chemicals.

Author Contributions

M.F.R., M.S.A., J.C., B.S.H., S.C.J., and K.-h.B. discussed data and designed the paper. M.F.R., M.S.A., and K.-h.B. wrote the manuscript. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (IPET) through Agri-Bio industry Technology Development Program, funded by Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) (117044-3).

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the research funding provided by Yeungnam University, Korea.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sasse, J.; Martinoia, E.; Northen, T. Feed your friends: Do plant exudates shape the root microbiome? Trends Plant Sci. 2018, 23, 25–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hartmann, A.; Rothballer, M.; Schmid, M. Lorenz Hiltner, a pioneer in rhizosphere microbial ecology and soil bacteriology research. Plant Soil 2008, 312, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Morgan, J.A.W.; Bending, G.D.; White, P.J. Biological costs and benefits to plant-microbe interactions in the rhizosphere. J. Exp. Bot. 2005, 56, 1729–1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Beneduzi, A.; Ambrosini, A.; Passaglia, L.M.P. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): Their potential as antagonists and biocontrol agents. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2012, 35, 1044–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ongena, M.; Jacques, P. Bacillus lipopeptides: Versatile weapons for plant disease biocontrol. Trends Microbiol. 2008, 16, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chowdhury, S.P.; Dietel, K.; Rändler, M.; Schmid, M.; Junge, H.; Borriss, R.; Hartmann, A.; Grosch, R. Effects of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 on Lettuce growth and health under pathogen pressure and its impact on the rhizosphere bacterial community. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wu, L.; Wu, H.J.; Qiao, J.; Gao, X.; Borriss, R. Novel routes for improving biocontrol activity of Bacillus based bioinoculants. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pérez-García, A.; Romero, D.; de Vicente, A. Plant protection and growth stimulation by microorganisms: Biotechnological applications of Bacilli in agriculture. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2011, 22, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cawoy, H.; Bettiol, W.; Fickers, P.; Ongena, M. Bacillus-based biological control of plant diseases. Pestic. Mord. World-Pestic. Use Manag. 2009, 1849, 273–298. [Google Scholar]
  10. Krebs, B.; Höding, B.; Kübart, S.; Workie, M.A.; Junge, H.; Schmiedeknecht, G.; Grosch, R.; Bochow, H.; Hevesi, M. Use of Bacillus subtilis as biocontrol agent. I. Activities and characterization of Bacillus subtilis strains. Zeitschrift fur Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz 1998, 105, 181–197. [Google Scholar]
  11. Romanazzi, G.; Feliziani, E. Botrytis cinerea (Gray Mold). In Postharvest Decay: Control Strategies; Bautista-Banos, S., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 131–146. ISBN 9780124115682. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gordon, R.E.; Haynes, W.C.; Pang, C.H.-N. The genus Bacillus; Agriculture Handbook No. 427; U.S. Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA, 1973.
  13. Priest, F.G.; Goodfellow, M.; Shute, L.A.; Berkeley, R.C.W. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens sp. nov., nom. rev. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1987, 37, 69–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fritze, D. Taxonomy of the genus Bacillus and related genera: The aerobic endospore-forming bacteria. Phytopathology 2004, 94, 1245–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Chen, X.H.; Koumoutsi, A.; Scholz, R.; Eisenreich, A.; Schneider, K.; Heinemeyer, I.; Morgenstern, B.; Voss, B.; Hess, W.R.; Reva, O.; et al. Comparative analysis of the complete genome sequence of the plant growth-promoting bacterium Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007, 25, 1007–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ruiz-García, C.; Béjar, V.; Martínez-Checa, F.; Llamas, I.; Quesada, E. Bacillus velezensis sp. nov., a surfactant-producing bacterium isolated from the river Vélez in Málaga, southern Spain. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 191–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sumpavapol, P.; Tongyonk, L.; Tanasupawat, S.; Chokesajjawatee, N.; Luxananil, P.; Visessanguan, W. Bacillus siamensis sp. nov., isolated from salted crab (poo-khem) in Thailand. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2010, 60, 2364–2370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Madhaiyan, M.; Poonguzhali, S.; Kwon, S.W.; Sa, T.M. Bacillus methylotrophicus sp. nov., a methanol-utilizing, plant-growth-promoting bacterium isolated from rice rhizosphere soil. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2010, 60, 2490–2495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Borriss, R.; Chen, X.H.; Rueckert, C.; Blom, J.; Becker, A.; Baumgarth, B.; Fan, B.; Pukall, R.; Schumann, P.; Sproer, C.; et al. Relationship of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens clades associated with strains DSM 7T and FZB42T: A proposal for Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. amyloliquefaciens subsp. nov. and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum subsp. nov. based on complete genome sequence comparisons. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2011, 61, 1786–1801. [Google Scholar]
  20. Chowdhury, S.P.; Uhl, J.; Grosch, R.; Alquéres, S.; Pittroff, S.; Dietel, K.; Schmitt-Kopplin, P.; Borriss, R.; Hartmann, A. Cyclic lipopeptides of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum colonizing the Lettuce rhizosphere enhance plant defense responses toward the bottom rot pathogen Rhizoctonia solani. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2015, 28, 984–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dunlap, C.A.; Kim, S.J.; Kwon, S.W.; Rooney, A.P. Phylogenomic analysis shows that Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum is a later heterotypic synonym of Bacillus methylotrophicus. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2015, 65, 2104–2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dunlap, C.A.; Kim, S.J.; Kwon, S.W.; Rooney, A.P. Bacillus velezensis is not a later heterotypic synonym of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens; Bacillus methylotrophicus, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum and ‘Bacillus oryzicola’ are later heterotypic synonyms of Bacillus velezensis based on phylogenomics. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2016, 66, 1212–1217. [Google Scholar]
  23. Fan, B.; Blom, J.; Klenk, H.P.; Borriss, R. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus velezensis, and Bacillus siamensis form an “operational group B. amyloliquefaciens” within the B. subtilis species complex. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Castaneda-Alvarez, C.; Prodan, S.; Rosales, I.M.; Aballay, E. Exoenzymes and metabolites related to the nematicidal effect of rhizobacteria on Xiphinema index Thorne & Allen. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 120, 413–424. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Zhang, N.; Yang, D.; Wang, D.; Miao, Y.; Shao, J.; Zhou, X.; Xu, Z.; Li, Q.; Feng, H.; Li, S.; et al. Whole transcriptomic analysis of the plant-beneficial rhizobacterium Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR9 during enhanced biofilm formation regulated by maize root exudates. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Yuan, J.; Raza, W.; Shen, Q.; Huang, Q. Antifungal activity of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens NJN-6 volatile compounds against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 5942–5944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, C.Y.; Hu, W.C.; Pan, B.; Liu, Y.; Yuan, S.F.; Ding, Y.Y.; Li, R.; Zheng, X.Y.; Shen, Q.R. Rhizobacterium Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain SQRT3-mediated induced systemic resistance controls bacterial wilt of Tomato. Pedosphere 2017, 27, 1135–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ryu, C.-M.; Farag, M.A.; Hu, C.-H.; Reddy, M.S.; Kloepper, J.W.; Pare, P.W. Bacterial volatiles induce systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134, 1017–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, X.H.; Koumoutsi, A.; Scholz, R.; Schneider, K.; Vater, J.; Süssmuth, R.; Piel, J.; Borriss, R. Genome analysis of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 reveals its potential for biocontrol of plant pathogens. J. Biotechnol. 2009, 140, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Romero-Tabarez, M.; Jansen, R.; Sylla, M.; Lünsdorf, H.; Häussler, S.; Santosa, D.A.; Timmis, K.N.; Molinari, G. 7-O-malonyl macrolactin A, a new macrolactin antibiotic from Bacillus subtilis active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, and a small-colony variant of Burkholderia cepacia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 1701–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, X.H.; Scholz, R.; Borriss, M.; Junge, H.; Mögel, G.; Kunz, S.; Borriss, R. Difficidin and bacilysin produced by plant-associated Bacillus amyloliquefaciens are efficient in controlling fire blight disease. J. Biotechnol. 2009, 140, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wu, L.; Wu, H.; Chen, L.; Xie, S.; Zang, H.; Borriss, R.; Gao, X. Bacilysin from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 has specific bactericidal activity against harmful algal bloom species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 7512–7520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cao, Y.; Pi, H.; Chandrangsu, P.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, H.; Xiong, H.; Helmann, J.D.; Cai, Y. Antagonism of two plant-growth promoting Bacillus velezensis isolates against Ralstonia solanacearum and Fusarium oxysporum. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. White, P.; Joshi, A.; Rassam, P.; Housden, N.G.; Kaminska, R.; Goult, J.D.; Redfield, C.; McCaughey, L.C.; Walker, D.; Mohammed, S.; et al. Exploitation of an iron transporter for bacterial protein antibiotic import. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 12051–12056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Arias, A.A.; Ongena, M.; Devreese, B.; Terrak, M.; Joris, B.; Fickers, P. Characterization of amylolysin, a novel lantibiotic from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens GA1. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  36. Cascales, E.; Buchanan, S.K.; Duche, D.; Kleanthous, C.; Lloubes, R.; Postle, K.; Riley, M.; Slatin, S.; Cavard, D. Colicin Biology. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2007, 71, 158–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Scholz, R.; Molohon, K.J.; Nachtigall, J.; Vater, J.; Markley, A.L.; Süssmuth, R.D.; Mitchell, D.A.; Borriss, R. Plantazolicin, a novel microcin B17/streptolysin S-like natural product from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. J. Bacteriol. 2011, 193, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Scholz, R.; Vater, J.; Budiharjo, A.; Wang, Z.; He, Y.; Dietel, K.; Schwecke, T.; Herfort, S.; Lasch, P.; Borriss, R. Amylocyclicin, a novel circular bacteriocin produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. J. Bacteriol. 2014, 196, 1842–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Gu, Q.; Yang, Y.; Yuan, Q.; Shi, G.; Wu, L.; Lou, Z.; Huo, R.; Wu, H.; Borriss, R.; Gao, X. Bacillomycin D produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens is involved in the antagonistic interaction with the plant-pathogenic fungus Fusarium graminearum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chen, X.H.; Vater, J.; Piel, J.; Franke, P.; Scholz, R.; Schneider, K.; Koumoutsi, A.; Hitzeroth, G.; Grammel, N.; Strittmatter, A.W.; et al. Structural and functional characterization of three polyketide synthase gene clusters in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 4024–4036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Koumoutsi, A.; Chen, X.H.; Henne, A.; Liesegang, H.; Hitzeroth, G.; Franke, P.; Vater, J.; Borriss, R. Structural and functional characterization of gene clusters directing nonribosomal synthesis of bioactive cyclic lipopeptides in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain FZB42. J. Bacteriol. 2004, 186, 1084–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Koenning, S.R.; Overstreet, C.; Noling, J.W.; Donald, P.A.; Becker, J.O.; Fortnum, B.A. Survey of crop losses in response to phytoparasitic nematodes in the United States for 1994. J. Nematol. 1999, 31, 587–618. [Google Scholar]
  43. Tian, B.; Yang, J.; Zhang, K.Q. Bacteria used in the biological control of plant-parasitic nematodes: Populations, mechanisms of action, and future prospects. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2007, 61, 197–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Burkett-Cadena, M.; Kokalis-Burelle, N.; Lawrence, K.S.; van Santen, E.; Kloepper, J.W. Suppressiveness of root-knot nematodes mediated by rhizobacteria. Biol. Control 2008, 47, 55–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liu, Z.; Budiharjo, A.; Wang, P.; Shi, H.; Fang, J.; Borriss, R.; Zhang, K.; Huang, X. The highly modified microcin peptide plantazolicin is associated with nematicidal activity of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 10081–10090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Fukushima, T.; Allred, B.E.; Sia, A.K.; Nichiporuk, R.; Andersen, U.N.; Raymond, K.N. Gram-positive siderophore-shuttle with iron-exchange from Fe-siderophore to apo-siderophore by Bacillus cereus YxeB. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 13821–13826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Saha, R.; Saha, N.; Donofrio, R.S.; Bestervelt, L.L. Microbial siderophores: A mini review. J. Basic Microbiol. 2013, 53, 303–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Schulz-Bohm, K.; Martín-Sánchez, L.; Garbeva, P. Microbial volatiles: Small molecules with an important role in intra- and inter-kingdom interactions. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ossowicki, A.; Jafra, S.; Garbeva, P. The antimicrobial volatile power of the rhizospheric isolate Pseudomonas donghuensis P482. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Compant, S.; Duffy, B.; Nowak, J.; Cle´ment, C.; Barka, E.A. Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: Principles, mechanisms of action, and future prospects. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 4951–4959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ryu, C.M.; Farag, M.A.; Hu, C.H.; Reddy, M.S.; Wei, H.X.; Paré, P.W.; Kloepper, J.W. Bacterial volatiles promote growth in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 4927–4932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Raza, W.; Ling, N.; Yang, L.; Huang, Q.; Shen, Q. Response of Tomato wilt pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum to the volatile organic compounds produced by a biocontrol strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR-9. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Li, Y.; Gu, Y.; Li, J.; Xu, M.; Wei, Q.; Wang, Y. Biocontrol agent Bacillus amyloliquefaciens LJ02 induces systemic resistance against Cucurbits powdery mildew. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Schneider, K.; Chen, X.H.; Vater, J.; Franke, P.; Nicholson, G.; Borriss, R.; Süssmuth, R.D. Macrolactin is the polyketide biosynthesis product of the pks2 cluster of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. J. Nat. Prod. 2007, 70, 1417–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wu, L.; Wu, H.; Chen, L.; Yu, X.; Borriss, R.; Gao, X. Difficidin and bacilysin from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 have antibacterial activity against Xanthomonas oryzae rice pathogens. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Kalyon, B.; Helaly, S.E.; Scholz, R.; Nachtigall, J.; Vater, J.; Borriss, R.; Süssmuth, R.D. Plantazolicin A and B: Structure elucidation of ribosomally synthesized thiazole/oxazole peptides from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 2996–2999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Guo, S.; Li, X.; He, P.; Ho, H.; Wu, Y.; He, Y. Whole-genome sequencing of Bacillus subtilis XF-1 reveals mechanisms for biological control and multiple beneficial properties in plants. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 42, 925–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Rückert, C.; Blom, J.; Chen, X.H.; Reva, O.; Borriss, R. Genome sequence of B. amyloliquefaciens type strain DSM7T reveals differences to plant-associated B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 155, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Jeong, H.; Jeong, D.E.; Kim, S.H.; Song, G.C.; Park, S.Y.; Ryu, C.M.; Park, S.H.; Choi, S.K. Draft genome sequence of the plant growth-promoting bacterium Bacillus siamensis KCTC 13613T. J. Bacteriol. 2012, 194, 4148–4149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Harwood, C.R.; Mouillon, J.-M.; Pohl, S.; Arnau, J. Secondary metabolite production and the safety of industrially important members of the Bacillus subtilis group. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2018, 721–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sansinenea, E.; Ortiz, A. Secondary metabolites of soil Bacillus spp. Biotechnol. Lett. 2011, 33, 1523–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Van Peer, R.; Niemann, G.J.; Schippers, B. Induced resistance and phytoalexin accumulation in biological control of fusarium wilt of Carnation by Pseudomonas sp. strain WCS417r. Phytopathology 1991, 81, 728–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bakker, P.A.H.M.; Pieterse, C.M.J.; van Loon, L.C. Induced systemic resistance by fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. Phytopathology 2007, 97, 239–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Verhagen, B.; Trotel-Aziz, P.; Jeandet, P.; Baillieul, F.; Aziz, A. Improved resistance against Botrytis cinerea by grapevine-associated bacteria that induce a prime oxidative burst and phytoalexin production. Phytopathology 2011, 101, 768–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Van Loon, L.C. Plant responses to plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2007, 119, 243–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Park, K.; Park, Y.-S.; Ahamed, J.; Dutta, S.; Ryu, H.; Lee, S.-H.; Balaraju, K.; Manir, M.; Moon, S.-S. Elicitation of induced systemic resistance of chili pepper by iturin A analogs derived from Bacillus vallismortis EXTN-1. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2016, 96, 564–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Verhagen, B.W.M.; Glazebrook, J.; Zhu, T.; Chang, H.-S.; van Loon, L.C.; Pieterse, C.M.J. The transcriptome of rhizobacteria-induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2004, 17, 895–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Niu, D.-D.; Liu, H.-X.; Jiang, C.-H.; Wang, Y.-P.; Wang, Q.-Y.; Jin, H.-L.; Guo, J.-H. The plant growth–promoting rhizobacterium Bacillus cereus AR156 induces systemic resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana by simultaneously activating salicylate -and jasmonate/ethylene-dependent signaling pathways. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2011, 24, 533–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bleich, R.; Watrous, J.D.; Dorrestein, P.C.; Bowers, A.A.; Shank, E.A. Thiopeptide antibiotics stimulate biofilm formation in Bacillus subtilis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 3086–3091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Rudrappa, T.; Czymmek, K.J.; Pare, P.W.; Bais, H.P. Root-secreted malic acid recruits beneficial soil bacteria. Plant Physiol. 2008, 148, 1547–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Weng, J.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Shen, Q.; Zhang, R. Enhanced root colonization and biocontrol activity of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR9 by abrB gene disruption. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 8823–8830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Molecules 24 01046 g001 550
Figure 1. Bacillus velezensis is the conspecific species integrating B. amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum and B. methylotrophicus (adapted by Dunlap et al. [22]). The significance of the numbers are explained at the bottom of the same column.
Figure 1. Bacillus velezensis is the conspecific species integrating B. amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum and B. methylotrophicus (adapted by Dunlap et al. [22]). The significance of the numbers are explained at the bottom of the same column.
Molecules 24 01046 g001
Molecules 24 01046 g002 550
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree constructed from the rpoB gene sequences of type strains of species from the “B. subtilis species complex” by the neighbor-joining method (using MEGA software). Bootstrap values (%) are given at the nodes obtained by repeating the analysis 1000 times. The scale bar indicates 0.02 nucleotide substitutions per nucleotide position.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree constructed from the rpoB gene sequences of type strains of species from the “B. subtilis species complex” by the neighbor-joining method (using MEGA software). Bootstrap values (%) are given at the nodes obtained by repeating the analysis 1000 times. The scale bar indicates 0.02 nucleotide substitutions per nucleotide position.
Molecules 24 01046 g002
Molecules 24 01046 g003 550
Figure 3. Molecular structure of ribosomal and nonribosomal bioactive compounds synthesized by B. velezensis.
Figure 3. Molecular structure of ribosomal and nonribosomal bioactive compounds synthesized by B. velezensis.
Molecules 24 01046 g003
Molecules 24 01046 g004 550
Figure 4. Signal transduction pathway of induced systemic resistance stimulated by B. velezensis. NPR1: non-expressor of PR1; JA/ET: the jasmonic acid/ethylene signaling pathways; SA: Salicylic Acid.
Figure 4. Signal transduction pathway of induced systemic resistance stimulated by B. velezensis. NPR1: non-expressor of PR1; JA/ET: the jasmonic acid/ethylene signaling pathways; SA: Salicylic Acid.
Molecules 24 01046 g004
Table
Table 1. Genes and gene clusters encoding for the secondary metabolites in B. velezensis.
Table 1. Genes and gene clusters encoding for the secondary metabolites in B. velezensis.
MetaboliteGenes and gene clustersEnzymeSize (kb)FunctionsControlling EffectsReferences
Nonribosomal synthesis of lipopeptides (LP)
SurfactinsrfABCDNRPS32.0Biofilm, Induction of ISRFungi[20]
FengycinfenABCDENRPS38.2Induction of ISRFungi[41]
Bacillomycin-DbmyCBADNRPS/PKS39.7Induction of ISRFungi[33,41]
BacillibactindhbABCDEFNRPS12.8Siderophore productionMicrobial competitors[53]
Nonribosomal synthesis of polyketides (PK)
DifficidindfnAYXBCDEFGHIJKLMNRPS71.1Direct suppressionBacteria[7,40]
BacillaenebaeBCDE, acpK, baeGHIJLMNRSPKS/NRPS74.3Direct suppressionBacteria[40]
MacrolactinmlnABCDEFGHINRPS53.9Direct suppressionBacteria[30,54]
Nonribosomal synthesis of dipeptide antibiotics
BacilysinbacABCDE, ywfGNRPS6.9Direct suppressionBacteria, Cyanobacteria[55]
Ribosomal synthesis of bacteriocins
PlantazolicinpznFKGHIAJC DBEL-9.96Direct suppressionBacteria, Nematodes[37,56]
AmylocyclicinacnBACDEF-4.49Direct suppressionBacteria[38]
Synthesis of VOCs
Acetoin and 2,3-butandiolalsSD; bdhAAcetolactate synthase/decarboxylase and 2,3-butanediol dehydrogenase 3.6Induction of ISRBacteria, Fungi[28,52]
NRPS = nonribosomal peptide synthetases; PKS = polyketide synthases; ISR = induced systemic resistance; VOCs: volatile organic compounds.
Table
Table 2. List of various bioactive metabolites synthesized by B. velezensis and the closely related species.
Table 2. List of various bioactive metabolites synthesized by B. velezensis and the closely related species.
Bacillus SpeciesBioactive MetabolitesReferences
B. velezensisAmylocyclicin, Bacilysin, Bacillomycin-D, Bacillibactin, Bacillaene, Difficidin, Fengycin, Macrolactin, Plantazolicin, Surfactin[15]
B. subtilisBacillibactin, Bacillaene, Bacilysin, Difficidin, Bacitracin, Fengycin, Locillomycin, Subtilosin, Surfactin[23,57]
B. amyloliquefacienssubsp.amyloliquefaciensBacillibactin, Bacillaene, Bacillomycin-D, Bacilysin, Fengycin, Surfactin[23,58]
B. siamensisBacillomycin-D, Bacillaene, Difficidin, Fengycin, Surfactin[59]
B. licheniformisBacitracin, Lichenysin, Lichenin[60]
B. pumilusAmicoumacin, Bacilysin, Bacircine, Pumilacidin[61]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rabbee, M.F.; Ali, M.S.; Choi, J.; Hwang, B.S.; Jeong, S.C.; Baek, K.-h. Bacillus velezensis: A Valuable Member of Bioactive Molecules within Plant Microbiomes. Molecules 2019, 24, 1046. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24061046

AMA Style

Rabbee MF, Ali MS, Choi J, Hwang BS, Jeong SC, Baek K-h. Bacillus velezensis: A Valuable Member of Bioactive Molecules within Plant Microbiomes. Molecules. 2019; 24(6):1046. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24061046

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rabbee, Muhammad Fazle, Md. Sarafat Ali, Jinhee Choi, Buyng Su Hwang, Sang Chul Jeong, and Kwang-hyun Baek. 2019. "Bacillus velezensis: A Valuable Member of Bioactive Molecules within Plant Microbiomes" Molecules 24, no. 6: 1046. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24061046

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop