Next Article in Journal
Effect of PLA/PBAT Antibacterial Film on Storage Quality of Passion Fruit during the Shelf-Life
Next Article in Special Issue
Non-Enzymatic Electrochemical Sensor Based on Sliver Nanoparticle-Decorated Carbon Nanotubes
Previous Article in Journal
Anti-Inflammatory Properties of Bellevalia saviczii Root Extract and Its Isolated Homoisoflavonoid (Dracol) Are Mediated by Modification on Calcium Signaling
Previous Article in Special Issue
Copper Nanowires Modified with Graphene Oxide Nanosheets for Simultaneous Voltammetric Determination of Ascorbic Acid, Dopamine and Acetaminophen
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 24
Issue 18
10.3390/molecules24183374
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Fabrication of Graphene/Molybdenum Disulfide Composites and Their Usage as Actuators for Electrochemical Sensors and Biosensors

by
Jiri Kudr
1,
Vojtech Adam
1,2 and
Ondrej Zitka
1,2,*
1
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Mendel University in Brno, Zemedelska 1, Brno CZ-613 00, Czech Republic
2
Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Brno CZ-616 00, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2019, 24(18), 3374; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24183374
Submission received: 22 August 2019 / Revised: 6 September 2019 / Accepted: 11 September 2019 / Published: 17 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances of Bioanalytical Electrochemistry of Molecules)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
From the rediscovery of graphene in 2004, the interest in layered graphene analogs has been exponentially growing through various fields of science. Due to their unique properties, novel two-dimensional family of materials and especially transition metal dichalcogenides are promising for development of advanced materials of unprecedented functions. Progress in 2D materials synthesis paved the way for the studies on their hybridization with other materials to create functional composites, whose electronic, physical or chemical properties can be engineered for special applications. In this review we focused on recent progress in graphene-based and MoS2 hybrid nanostructures. We summarized and discussed various fabrication approaches and mentioned different 2D and 3D structures of composite materials with emphasis on their advances for electroanalytical chemistry. The major part of this review provides a comprehensive overview of the application of graphene-based materials and MoS2 composites in the fields of electrochemical sensors and biosensors.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In the last decade we were witnesses of a rapid development of materials science research. Inspired and motivated by the legendary Feynman’s lecture, many scientists are watching to “the bottom” and focusing on the unique physicochemical and mechanical properties of nanomaterials. In the 1960’s, a simple scotch tape technique was used to mechanically exfoliate bulk MoS2 to a few-layers state; this also enabled the isolation of other layered materials decades later, including graphene [1,2,3]. After pristine graphene isolation in 2004, burgeoning research in the field of layered 2D materials began [2]. Nowadays, we can use several top-down and bottom-up synthetic procedures to obtain materials with exact numbers of layers and specific properties. In addition, stacking of layered materials on each other due to van der Waals forces can be used to engineer heterostructured solids with unprecedented properties [4].
2D layered materials represent the thinnest (atomically thin) unsupported crystalline solids without dangling bonds thus providing superior intralayer transport of light, heat, spin and charge [5]. Graphene, a single layer of carbon atoms bound in hexagonal honeycomb lattice, is a prominent member of the 2D layered materials group. It possesses several extraordinary properties extensively described elsewhere [6]. Thevenot et al. described an electrochemical biosensor as an integrated receptor–transducer device which provides selective quantitative or semi-quantitative analytical information using a biological recognition element and an electrochemical transducer [7]. The integration of graphene-based materials with an electrochemical transducer provides several advantages, such as increased conductivity, electron transfer rate and/or increased surface-to-volume ratio of transducer thanks to graphene’s ultrathin structure [8,9,10,11]. Further, graphene’s ability to be functionalized with heteroatoms, various molecules or functional groups is part of the superior property of this unique material. The electronic and chemical properties of graphene-based materials are highly influenced by the content of oxygen functional groups. Graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO), as oxygenated monolayers of carbon atoms are widely applied in bioelectronics and biosensors due to higher hydrophilicity (compared to graphene) and the presence of oxygen-containing groups, which enable broad possibilities for functionalization. It is worth noting that conductivity of graphene decreases with increasing oxygen content, thus a material of optimal C/O ratio is needed for individual applications.
Transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) are graphene analogs formed by stacking of sulfur-transition metal–sulfur sheets through van der Waals forces. As a consequence, individual layers can be exfoliated from bulk material to single-layer form. Molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) is a typical member of TMDs. It is composed of a stack of hexagonal layers of Mo atoms sandwiched between two layers of S atoms and possesses p-type semiconducting properties with poor electrical conductivity. MoS2 has two main advantages in electrochemical (bio)sensors. Firstly, it provides additional electrochemically active sites. Secondly, it can improve transducer properties by accommodating additional elements such as metal nanoparticles or biorecognition (e.g., antibodies, enzymes, aptamers) [12]. Similar to graphene, MoS2 possesses different affinities towards ssDNA and dsDNA [13]. Such behavior enables integration of MoS2 with broadly used aptamer technology. However, 2D MoS2 still suffers from several drawbacks. Restacking of 2D materials due high surface energy can decrease the amount of electrochemically active sites, and poor electrical conductivity limits its use as transduction enhancer. Therefore, the hybridization of 2D MoS2 with highly conductive materials such as graphene can help to overcome mentioned drawbacks and can result in materials with fascinating electroanalytical properties.
Several reviews showing the use of MoS2 or the group of TMDs in the field of electrochemical (bio)sensors have been published [14,15,16,17], however here we focus strictly on graphene-based composite materials with MoS2 (Gr/MoS2). We briefly summarize the most important synthetic procedures providing mentioned material. The vast majority of this review focuses on the electroanalytical performance of devices and different state-of-art electrochemical biosensing approaches benefiting from the unique properties of graphene/MoS2 composites.

2. Synthesis of Gr/2D MoS2 Composites

Many different methods have been developed for fabrication of Gr/MoS2 hybrid materials of exact properties such as thickness, morphology, number of electroactive sites. Desired properties of materials correspond with their application purposes and for this reason a significant part of this review is focused on Gr/MoS2 synthesis.

2.1. Hydrothermal and Solvothermal Synthesis

These methods are based on growth of MoS2 structures over graphene/GO/rGO support. MoS2 molecular precursors (e.g., Na2MoO4 and thioacetamide) are dissolved in aqueous (hydrothermal) or organic solvents (solvothermal synthesis) and they are thermally treated in stainless steel reactors for an exact time and at a specific temperature above boiling point of solvent. Products of various properties can be obtained by optimization of heating temperature, reaction time and presence of additional compounds such as surfactants. Advantages of these methods are high yields, simple procedures and relatively low cost of equipment. However, the biggest drawback is low control of the synthesis process.
A few-layer MoS2 hybrid with GO was synthesized by Yu et al. [18]. They used N-methylimidazole water-soluble pillar [5] arene as a surfactant to improve distribution of MoS2 sheets on commercial GO. They heated a solution containing 7 mg∙mL−1 of GO, 1.5 mmol Na2MoO4, 7.5 mmol L-cysteine dissolved in 40 mL deionized water at 240 °C for 24 h. The freeze-dried product was annealed in a tube furnace at 500 °C for 2 h in flow of 10% hydrogen in nitrogen. This approach provided laterally (in-plane) stacked MoS2 on Gr/GO/rGO substrates as reported in other publications with alternative surfactants or without surfactant [19,20,21]. On the contrary, without surfactant, MoS2 vertically stacked on electrochemically exfoliated graphite (EG) as a substrate was reported by Wang et al. [22]. They mixed EG with (NH4)2MoS4 in weight ratios from 1:1 to 1:13 in the presence of hydrazine and treated these mixtures in stainless steel reactors at 200 °C for 15 h and obtained Gr/MoS2 with 95 wt% MoS2 content. The product of this reported synthesis can be seen in Figure 1A,B. Hydrothermal growth of MoS2 on GO in the presence of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) and oxalate dihydrate was reported by Teng et al. [23]. As a MoS2 precursors, they used ammonium paramolybdate (NH4)6Mo7O24 and thiourea and heated their mixture with GO at 180 °C for 12 h in 100 mL autoclave. Then the material was annealed at 800 °C in argon atmosphere to obtain rGO/MoS2. Finally, they covered rGO/MoS2 with amorphous carbon using chemical vapor deposition (CVD) to enhance charge transfer through composite (Figure 1C). Hydrothermal and solvothermal methods are able to fabricate graphene and MoS2 hybrid materials with various 2D and 3D structures. As reported Sun et al., just by changing the rGO amount in the reaction, 3D assembly of MoS2 can be tuned from nanoflowers to crosslinked nanosheets laterally stacked on GO [24]. They used mixed solvothermal synthesis in an ethanol and octylamine mixture. Mixed solvents of deionized water and dimethylformamide (DMF) in a 1:2 ratio were used by Zhao et al. [25]. They observed the effect of NH3·H2O concentration in the reaction reactor on the final product and compared the results with solution with pH adjusted with NaOH. When NH3·H2O was added to reaction mixture, the 3D porous framework constructed by interconnected lamellar nanosheets of Gr/MoS2 hydrogel became more homogeneous with pore sizes from hundreds of nanometers to micrometers. In addition, the presence of NH3·H2O resulted in graphene N-doping. Solvothermal and hydrothermal approaches were also used to modify the 1D carbon fiber, carbon nanotubes or macroscopic carbon paper [26,27,28,29]. MoS2 stacked on carbon nanofiber as was reported by Li et al. can be seen in Figure 1D,E.

2.2. Thermal and Chemical Reduction

These methods of Gr/MoS2 synthesis are even more facile than hydrothermal and solvothermal ones. In case of thermal reduction, the thermal energy is used to convert MoS2 molecular precursors to MoS2 solid materials which are stuck on graphene-based support. In case of chemical reduction, chemical reductants are used to reduce MoS2 precursors to 2D MoS2. Although these methods can easily produce Gr/MoS2 in gram-scale, the main drawback is the control over synthesis process and that the properties of the product can hardly be predicted. The common procedure for Gr/MoS2 fabrication using thermal reduction is to dissolve the Mo salt with S source to create homogeneous solution which is subsequently dried and thermally treated at several hundred °C in inert atmosphere. Srivastava et al. fabricated MoS2 and graphene oxide composite by thermal exfoliation and reduction [30]. They ground ammonium thiomolybdate and graphite oxide and treated the powder for 6 h at 400 °C and finally for 15 min at 1200 °C under flow of nitrogen gas. Koroteev et al. fabricated Gr/MoS2 composite by impregnation of graphene with Mo-containing compound followed by thermal decomposition [31]. They dispersed graphene flakes in water–ethanol mixed solution with addition of ammonium thiomolybdate. Before thermal conversion (500–800 °C for 1 h) of MoS3 to MoS2 at vacuum, thiomolybdate was decomposed using HCl and dried at air atmosphere. Instead of thermal reduction in inert gas or vacuum, synthesis in the presence of CS2 results in S-doping of graphene-based materials (Figure 2A) [32]. Freeze-drying of graphene-based materials with MoS2 precursors provides benefits of sponge-like 3D products before thermal reduction [33]. As Jiang et al. mentioned, these 3D structures can help to prevent graphene or MoS2 restacking problems during synthesis and further processing [34]. They fabricated Gr/MoS2 of stable 3D structure using a combination of hydrothermal and chemical reduction methods. Firstly, they fabricated monolayer MoS2 and graphene oxide. They mixed GO and MoS2 in isopropanol/water solution where functional groups of GO attracted MoS2. The solution was hydrothermally treated to create porous 3D architecture. Subsequently the composite, or more precisely GO, was reduced using hydrazine. Ji et al. fabricated rGO/MoS2 by dry ball-milling of MoS2 and bulk GO at a ratio of 1:1 for 5 h [35]. The product was subsequently chemically reduced with hydrazine. Wang et al. used hydrazine to reduce (NH4)2MoS4 too. In addition, they used cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) as cationic surfactant to promote interaction between negatively charged GO and MoS42− [36].

2.3. Microwave and Electrochemical Synthesis

Microwave synthesis is an effective method for Gr/MoS2 fabrication and represents an alternative to thermal methods. It can induce rapid decomposition of MoS2 precursors and hence lowers the energy consumption and does not need any chemical reductant. Effective one-pot microwave-assisted solvothermal synthesis was reported by Li et al. [37]. They dispersed liquid-exfoliated graphene (0.71 mg∙mL−1) in N-methylpyrrolidone with addition of 1-dodecanethiol, Na2MoO4·2H2O and thiourea. Such solution was heated in a specialized glass reactor using microwave at 200 °C for 12 h. Post-synthesis treatment in tube furnace at 800 °C for 2 h was used to remove sulfur residues and improve product crystallinity (composite can be seen in Figure 2B,C). Xiang et al. decorated chemical vapor deposited graphene foam with MoS2 nanoflowers using a microwave reactor [38]. More precisely, they irradiated an aqueous solution of Na2MoO4·2H2O, thioacetamide and graphene foam in glass tube and kept it at 180 °C for 12 h. Far shorter irradiation of the reaction mixture was reported by Li et al. [39]. They kept a solution of GO, phosphomolybdic acid hydrate and thioacetamide adjusted to pH 7 at 150 °C and 150 W for 10 min.
The electrochemical approach to fabricate Gr/MoS2 composites represents a low-cost and fast method without the use of toxic compounds. Further, it seems to be the most suitable approach for application in electrochemical (bio)sensors since they can be fabricated directly by the electrochemists who are enabled to optimize product properties by using deposition conditions. Fabrication of Gr/MoS2-modified electrode without the need of any post-fabrication treatment was reported by Li et al. [40]. Firstly, they deposited rGO layer on fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) by electrochemical reduction of GO from aqueous solution at −1.2 V. MoS2 nanoparticles were subsequently deposited on the conductive surface of rGO layer through electrochemical deposition of ammonium thiomolybdate in KCl electrolyte at −1.0 V for 5 min. Wan et al. reported constant current deposition of vertical MoS2 structures over a CVD-covered graphene electrode [41]. They used a two-electrode system and (NH4)2MoS4 as an electrolyte. Two-electron reduction occurred at the carbon rod cathode which was covered with MoS2. On the graphene anode a thin film of MoS3 was oxidatively electrodeposited (Figure 2D). A highly crystalline Gr/MoS2-covered anode was obtained by treating anode in quartz tube at 800 °C.

2.4. Chemical Vapor Deposition

CVD is an effective method of high quality Gr/MoS2 composite fabrication which provides excellent control over the fabrication process. In general, the substrate (often metal) is exposed in a vacuum chamber to gaseous precursors which react and/or decompose to create the desired deposited material, and carrier gas removes byproducts. CVD of graphene is a well-established technique, however it still faces many problems hampering the further use of graphene in fundamental research and practice [42]. In addition, it requires expensive equipment and the process needs to be stringently coordinated, thus it seems to be more suitable for FET-based (bio)sensors [43]. Fabrication of vertically aligned MoS2 nanosheets on graphene using CVD was reported by Gnanasecar et al. [44]. They fabricated graphene using atmospheric pressure CVD of acetylene on Cu foil, and the graphene was transferred onto a SiO2 wafer using poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) film. Freestanding graphene on wafer was obtained by chemical etching of Cu and PMMA film. For MoS2 structures growing on graphene they used a home-made two-zone CVD reactor (Figure 2E). MoO3 and sulfur precursors were placed in separately controlled heating zones under the flow of Ar. The heating zone with MoO3 was ramped up to 650 °C (15 °C∙min−1), then slowly heated to 750 °C (2 °C∙min−1) and kept at 750 °C for 10 min. For sulfurization, the sulfur zone was rapidly heated to 200 °C (20 °C∙min−1). Biroju et al. used the mechanical transfer method of MoS2 on graphene [45]. They separately fabricated large area graphene and MoS2 using CVD and MoS2 on SiO2 wafer was uniformly pressed on graphene using a hydraulic pressurizer. Chen et al. fabricated MoSx composite with CVD graphene by dispersing graphene in (NH4)2MoS4 DMF solution and treating it in a quartz tube furnace at 120 °C and 500 °C for 1 h [46].

2.5. Alternative Approaches

Some alternative approaches which cannot be placed within above-mentioned categories were developed. A very facile method for Gr/MoS2 fabrication was developed by Kumar et al. [47]. First, they prepared graphite oxide solution by continuous magnetic stirring and sonication of graphite oxide in ethanol. After addition of bulk MoS2 into graphite oxide solution, ethanol was evaporated. Dry powder was treated with microwave irradiation (800 W, 130 s) for complete exfoliation of graphite oxide. Simple mixing of GO solution with MoS2 nanoparticles and annealing at 400 °C was reported by Venkatesan et al. [48].

3. Applications of Gr/2D MoS2 Composites

Graphene-based materials and MoS2 composites possess specific properties depending on their morphology and structure. The properties are mostly influenced by number of MoS2 layers, graphene degree of oxidation, composite plane or 3D structure. Thus they represent versatile materials, which were recognized as promising for several fields of science. Among others, electrochemical sensors and biosensors can benefit from Gr/MoS2 advances by improved analytical performance such as higher sensitivity, increased analyte selectivity, better peak-to-peak separation and/or a broader linear dynamic range. In this chapter, electroanalytical devices benefiting from Gr/MoS2 properties are divided into sensors and biosensors applications, which directly reduce/oxidize analyte and which use biological recognition elements, respectively.

3.1. Gr/2D MoS2 Composites in Electrochemical Sensors

Electrochemistry represents a facile technique to detect small molecules with high sensitivity, low detection limits, reasonable cost and short time consumption. Uric acid (UA), dopamine (DA) and ascorbic acid (AA) are small biological molecules, which are presented in human physiological fluids and can help to determine human states, including several diseases. However their simultaneous determination is still challenging due to electrode fouling and their oxidation at almost the same potentials. The improvement of electrode sensitivity towards uric acid (UA), dopamine (DA) and ascorbic acid (AA) and differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) peak-to-peak separation via electrode modification with reduced graphene oxide composite with MoS2 was demonstrated by Xing et al. [49]. They showed that porous nanostructure of the composite increased specific surface of the electrode by nearly 4-fold compared with MoS2 modification, provided more active sites for target molecules adsorption and as a result improved electrode catalytic performance. The same conclusions were also made by Huang et al. in case of acetaminophen sensing in the presence of AA and DA with a similar electrode [50]. Direct oxidation of nitrite ions on conventional electrodes is still challenging due to the high overpotentials required. Thus, different modified electrodes were reported for nitrite sensing [51,52,53,54]. Gr/MoS2 can be used to decrease nitrite ions reduction potentials to +0.8 V vs. Ag/AgCl and increase sensitivity (Figure 3A,B) [55]. Three-dimensional nanostructured graphene, MoS2 flowers and multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) composite was previously used for sensitive enzymeless determination of hydrogen peroxide [56]. An amperometric sensor based on modified glassy carbon electrode (GCE) showed excellent electrocatalytic activity towards reduction of H2O2, with a detection limit (LOD) of 0.83 μM, linear range of 5 µM–145 µM and sensitivity of 5.184 µA∙µM∙cm−2. Direct reduction of methyl parathion (its nitro functional group) was reported [57]. Methyl parathion belongs to the group of organophosphorus pesticides which generate concerns in food safety, water management and public health. Hydrothermally fabricated graphene MoS2 nanocomposite was used to modify GCE, and amperometry at −0.6 V vs. Ag/AgCl was used to compare the performance of bare, MoS2-modified and graphene-modified electrodes. A sensor was shown with parameters competitive to enzyme based detection—LOD 3.2 nM and linear dynamic range from 10 nM to 1.9 mM [58]. Good claimed selectivity of the sensor was ascribed to π-stacking of methyl parathion phenyl group on Gr/MoS2 composite, however discrimination was not possible between parathion and methyl parathion. Good performance of the sensor in spiked real fruit and vegetable samples was shown. A flexible electrochemical sensor of folic acid (FA) based on MoS2 nanosheet-modified rGO paper was designed by Kiransan et al. [59]. Their electrodes were fabricated by a two-step process. At first, the vacuum filtration of MoS2 and GO solution through polycarbonate membrane created a free-standing film of composite. Secondly, the film was reduced in HI solution for 1 h and then they cut the membrane to pieces of 5 × 10 mm. To obtain the best performance they optimized the ratio of GO and MoS2 in filtrated solution, finding that a 3:1 ratio was optimal. Oxidation of FA in 0.1 M PBS buffer (pH 7) took place at +0.73 mV vs. Ag/AgCl (Figure 3C). Amperometric detection resulted in LOD of 37 nM and the sensor showed good selectivity even in the serum and the presence of 1.0 mM AA and 0.5 mM UA (Figure 3D).

3.2. Gr/2D MoS2 Composites in Electrochemical Biosensors

Good biocompatibility of Gr/2D MoS2 materials has led many researchers to modify these materials with biological macromolecules such as nucleic acid aptamers, enzymes or antibodies. In case of enzymes, it was demonstrated that layered 3D structures help to increase enzymes’ stability and protect them from loss of activity. Several mediator-free enzyme-based biosensors benefiting from Gr/MoS2 properties were described. Among others, Yoon et al. designed the H2O2 biosensor based on myoglobin (Mb) redox activity [60]. In detail, they encapsulated MoS2 nanoparticles within GO and used this composite material to modify gold electrodes via chemical linker (the principle can be seen in Figure 4A). Mb is able to mediate electrochemical reduction of H2O2 due to the presence of iron within its core [61]. They compared the performance of the designed electrode with Mb/MoS2 and Mb/GO. Mb/GO/MoS2 showed an enhanced electrochemical signal even in the presence of AA, NaNO2 and NaHCO3. The amperometric read-out at −0.3 V vs. Ag/AgCl reached a LOD of 20 nM H2O2. The same approach with immobilization of Mb was used for biosensing of nitric oxide and nitrite ions [62,63]. Alternatively, hemoglobin can be used instead of Mb as showed by Liu et al. [64]. Jeong et al. compared the performance of planar Gr/MoS2 and Gr/MoS2 with 3D structure as enzymatic glucose biosensors [65]. They immobilized glucose oxidase (GOx) on glassy carbon electrodes modified with the mentioned composites and evaluated them with amperometric detection using flow-injection analysis. In general, glucose enzymatic biosensors sense H2O2 generated by oxidation of glucose by GOx. They summarized that the 3D-based biosensor possessed considerably higher sensitivity (3.36 μA∙mM−1) than a biosensor using the same but planar material (0.11 μA∙mM−1). At the H2O2 oxidation potential of −0.45 V the minimal influence of common interferences such as AA, DA or UA was observed. Graphene paper supported MoS2 nanocrystals monolayer with Cu submicron buds for biosensing of lactate and sensing of glucose in sweat, as reported by Wang et al. [66]. In this approach Cu buds enabled direct oxidation of glucose at +0.42 V vs. saturated calomel electrode (SCE) as was reported before [67,68]. For glucose, they reached LOD of 500 nM and linear dynamic range of 5–1775 μM with minimal influence of ions abundant in sweat such as Na+, Cl−, K+, Ca2+ and Mg2+. Further, they modified the mentioned electrode with lactate oxidase. Lactate oxidase is able to convert lactic acid to pyruvate and H2O2, which enabled the indirect quantification of the concentration of lactic acid. LOD of 0.1 μM was obtained for lactate but as authors point out, low detection limits are not mandatory for sweat analysis and stability, selectivity and wide linear range are preferred. Total concentration of phenolic compounds in red wine samples based on carbon screen-printed electrode modified with graphene quantum dots, MoS2 and Trametes versicolor laccase (TvL) was reported by Vasilescu et al. (Figure 4B) [69].
Apart from nucleic acid hybridization sensors, electrochemical signal transduction is highly suitable for detection of aptamer–protein interaction. Aptamers are single-stranded nucleic acid (DNA or RNA) which possess high affinity to target molecules, comparable to or even higher than antibodies. In comparison with antibodies, which are still taken as a golden standard in biorecognition elements, aptamers are about 10-times smaller, more thermally stable and cheaper. Since aptamers are selected in vivo, their sequence can be selected to preserve desired function even in non-physiological pH or high salt concentration (important for electroanalysis). Since no animals are used for aptamer production, molecules which do not cause immune response such as toxic compounds or small molecules such as ions can be used to produce aptamers. In response to these facts, aptamers are frequently used as biorecognition elements in many different analytical applications [70]. Among others, electrochemical aptasensing is rapidly developing and covers several fields such as food safety, environmental hazards, medical diagnosis, etc.
A voltammetric lipopolysaccharides (LPS) aptasensor benefiting from advanced properties of graphene and MoS2 composite was reported by Yuan et al. [71]. They used large specific surface of polyethyleneimine (PEI) functionalized rGO and MoS2 composite (PEI–rGO–MoS2) as a carrier for an electrochemical label—toluidine blue (TB). More precisely, they modified GCE with PEI–rGO–MoS2 and loaded it with TB. Next, they used gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) to attach thiolated LPS aptamer on the electrode and used bovine serum albumin (BSA) to block the electrode against unspecified binding of LPS. In the presence of LPS in analyzed samples the TB reduction signal (−0.35 V vs. SCE) gradually decreased. The response of the aptasensor linearly decreased with logarithm of LPS concentration in the range of 5.0 × 10−5 ng∙mL−1 to 2.0 × 102 ng∙mL−1 with the LOD of 3.01 × 10−5 ng∙mL−1. Their sensor showed good performance in the presence of common serum interferents such as BSA, AA, DA or glucose and showed recoveries in the range 101–103% in spiked serum samples. Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) was target of the aptasensor designed by Geleta et al. [72]. They synthesized rGO, MoS2 and polyaniline (PANI) composite covered with chitosan (CS). GCE modified as mentioned was used to immobilize thiolated AFB1 aptamer via AuNPs (Figure 4C). After aptamer immobilization, the surface excessive active sites were blocked with 6-mercapto-1-hexanol. They used [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− as an electrochemical reporter and observed a decrease of its DPV signal with increasing concentration of AFB1 in analyzed samples. They obtained a remarkable LOD of 0.002 fg∙mL−1 and a calibration curve with a linear range of 0.01 fg∙mL−1 to 1.0 fg∙mL−1 (Figure 4D).
Human papillomavirus (HPV) aptasensor was reported by Chekin et al. [73]. HPV is non-enveloped dsDNA virus that infects the epithelium and is associated with oncogenic risk. Since this virus is essential for the development of cervical cancer it is accepted as its molecular biomarker. They decided to detect HPV-16 via its L1 capsid protein. They drop-casted porous rGO on GCE and subsequently drop-casted MoS2 on rGO-modified GCE. GCE/rGO/MoS2 electrode was chemically functionalized using physisorption of thiol ligands (mixture of PEG and 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid (MUA)). NH2 functionalized L1 protein aptamer was subsequently immobilized on the electrode using carbodiimide chemistry (EDC/NHS). They used DPV to detect (Fe(CN)6)4− as a mediator whose signal showed a constant decrease in the L1 protein concentration range of 0.2–2ng∙mL−1 and LOD 0.1–2ng∙mL−1. rGO/MoS2 nanosheets and Fe3O4 NPs nanozyme synergic catalytic activity was used to amplify the signal of a MCF-7 cytosensor [74]. They used rGO/MoS2 composite for electrode modification due to its high surface area, fast electron transfer and good biocompatibility. For MCF-7 cells preconcentration, they used aptamer-modified superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles which were attracted by including attached cells to the surface of GCE via magnetic field (Figure 4E). Both materials, rGO/MoS2 and Fe3O4 NPs, possessed a synergetic effect in ability to reduce H2O2, and thus mediate 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) oxidation (+0.3 V vs. SCE). TMB oxidation product was analyzed using DPV and the concentration of MCF-7 cells in samples was reported. They obtained a LOD of 6 cells∙mL−1 and a linear range over 15–45 cells∙mL−1 (Figure 4F).

4. Conclusions

In summary, graphene-based materials have attracted great interest from the scientific community. Various fabrication methods which produce composites were developed in efforts to control their structure. The research in the field of graphene-based material composites with MoS2 is in its starting phase and our understanding of the fundamental connection between composite structures and their properties is limited. Methods mentioned in this review bring advantages but still face several challenges and their further development is needed.
Benefits of such composite materials for electroanalytical chemistry were demonstrated in many publications and are promising for further development in this field. Firstly, graphene-based material composites with MoS2 possess high electrocatalytic activity, good electric conductivity and high concentrations of electroactive sites. Such properties enable direct oxidation/reduction of various electroactive compounds, bringing higher sensitivity, selectivity and better peak-to-peak separation in complex samples. Rich functionalities of composites provide possibilities of biorecognition element immobilization. Increased electrode surfaces, often with rich 3D structures enable stable and efficient immobilization of enzymes and promote the development of third generation electrochemical biosensors independent of redox mediators or oxygen. The protective environment of graphene-based material composites with MoS2 provides immobilized enzymes and antibodies protection from degradation and helps to retain their function. Regarding aptamers, here such biosensors take advantage of increased surface and enhance the electrochemical signal of the reporter.
Gr/MoS2 was shown to be a beneficial material with several attractive properties. However, the aim of all advanced materials should be application in the real world. Here, we see the possibilities for integration of Gr/MoS2 to currently developed platforms such as screen-printed electrodes or those currently being developed, such as promising paper-based electrodes.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, J.K. and V.A.; writing—review and editing, O.Z.; supervision, V.A. and O.Z.

Funding

This work was supported by the project CEITEC 2020 (LQ1601) with financial support from the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic under the National Sustainability Programme II and by EFRR “Multidisciplinary research to increase application potential of nanomaterials in agricultural” (No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_025/0007314).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Frindt, R.F. Optical absorption of a few unit-cell layers of MoS2. Phys. Rev. 1965, 140, A536–A539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K.; Morozov, S.V.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S.V.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Firsov, A.A. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 2004, 306, 666–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Novoselov, K.S.; Jiang, D.; Schedin, F.; Booth, T.J.; Khotkevich, V.V.; Morozov, S.V.; Geim, A.K. Two-dimensional atomic crystals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 10451–10453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Das, S.; Robinson, J.A.; Dubey, M.; Terrones, H.; Terrones, M. Beyond Graphene: Progress in Novel Two-Dimensional Materials and van der Waals Solids. In Annual Review of Materials Research; Clarke, D.R., Ed.; Annual Reviews: Palo Alto, CA, USA, 2015; Volume 45, pp. 1–27. [Google Scholar]
  5. Xu, M.S.; Liang, T.; Shi, M.M.; Chen, H.Z. Graphene-Like Two-Dimensional Materials. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 3766–3798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Castro Neto, A.H.; Guinea, F.; Peres, N.M.R.; Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K. The electronic properties of graphene. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2009, 81, 109–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Thevenot, D.R.; Toth, K.; Durst, R.A.; Wilson, G.S. Electrochemical biosensors: Recommended definitions and classification—(Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 1999, 71, 2333–2348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhou, M.; Zhai, Y.M.; Dong, S.J. Electrochemical Sensing and Biosensing Platform Based on Chemically Reduced Graphene Oxide. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 5603–5613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, P.; Han, C.Y.; Zhou, F.Y.; Lu, J.S.; Han, X.G.; Wang, Z.W. Electrochemical determination of tert-butylhydroquinone and butylated hydroxyanisole at choline functionalized film supported graphene interface. Sens. Actuator B-Chem. 2016, 224, 885–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jiang, B.Y.; Wang, M.; Chen, Y.; Xie, J.Q.; Xiang, Y. Highly sensitive electrochemical detection of cocaine on graphene/AuNP modified electrode via catalytic redox-recycling amplification. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2012, 32, 305–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kudr, J.; Richtera, L.; Nejdl, L.; Xhaxhiu, K.; Vitek, P.; Rutkay-Nedecky, B.; Hynek, D.; Kopel, P.; Adam, V.; Kizek, R. Improved Electrochemical Detection of Zinc Ions Using Electrode Modified with Electrochemically Reduced Graphene Oxide. Materials 2016, 9, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, W.S.; Zhang, P.P.; Su, Z.Q.; Wei, G. Synthesis and sensor applications of MoS2-based nanocomposites. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 18364–18378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, Y.S.; Ma, T.C.; Ma, S.Y.; Liu, Y.J.; Tian, Y.P.; Wang, R.N.; Jiang, Y.B.; Hou, D.J.; Wang, J.L. Fluorometric determination of the antibiotic kanamycin by aptamer-induced FRET quenching and recovery between MoS2 nanosheets and carbon dots. Microchim. Acta 2017, 184, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sinha, A.; Dhanjai; Tan, B.; Huang, Y.J.; Zhao, H.M.; Dang, X.M.; Chen, J.P.; Jain, R. MoS2 nanostructures for electrochemical sensing of multidisciplinary targets: A review. Trac-Trends Anal. Chem. 2018, 102, 75–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kalantar-zadeh, K.; Ou, J.Z. Biosensors Based on Two-Dimensional MoS2. ACS Sens. 2016, 1, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, Y.H.; Huang, K.J.; Wu, X. Recent advances in transition-metal dichalcogenides based electrochemical biosensors: A review. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 97, 305–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Thanh, T.D.; Chuong, N.D.; Hien, H.V.; Kshetri, T.; Tuan, L.H.; Kim, N.H.; Lee, J.H. Recent advances in two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides-graphene heterostructured materials for electrochemical applications. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2018, 96, 51–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yu, Z.T.; Ye, J.B.; Chen, W.X.; Xu, S.R.; Huang, F.H. Fabrication of few-layer molybdenum disulfide/reduced graphene oxide hybrids with enhanced lithium storage performance through a supramolecule-mediated hydrothermal route. Carbon 2017, 114, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Huang, G.C.; Chen, T.; Chen, W.X.; Wang, Z.; Chang, K.; Ma, L.; Huang, F.H.; Chen, D.Y.; Lee, J.Y. Graphene-Like MoS2/Graphene Composites: Cationic Surfactant-Assisted Hydrothermal Synthesis and Electrochemical Reversible Storage of Lithium. Small 2013, 9, 3693–3703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Guo, X.R.; Hou, Y.; Ren, R.; Chen, J.H. Temperature-dependent Crystallization of MoS2 Nanoflakes on Graphene Nanosheets for Electrocatalysis. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chang, K.; Chen, W.X. In situ synthesis of MoS2/graphene nanosheet composites with extraordinarily high electrochemical performance for lithium ion batteries. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 4252–4254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, G.; Zhang, J.; Yang, S.; Wang, F.X.; Zhuang, X.D.; Mullen, K.; Feng, X.L. Vertically Aligned MoS2 Nanosheets Patterned on Electrochemically Exfoliated Graphene for High-Performance Lithium and Sodium Storage. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1702254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Teng, Y.Q.; Zhao, H.L.; Zhang, Z.J.; Zhao, L.N.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Z.L.; Xia, Q.; Du, Z.H.; Swierczek, K. MoS2 nanosheets vertically grown on reduced graphene oxide via oxygen bonds with carbon coating as ultrafast sodium ion batteries anodes. Carbon 2017, 119, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sun, H.Y.; Zhao, Y.Y.; Molhave, K. Graphene Oxide-Directed Tunable Assembly of MoS2 Ultrathin Nanosheets for Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. ChemistrySelect 2017, 2, 4696–4704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhao, L.; Hong, C.C.; Lin, L.X.; Wu, H.P.; Su, Y.W.; Zhang, X.B.; Liu, A.P. Controllable nanoscale engineering of vertically aligned MoS2 ultrathin nanosheets by nitrogen doping of 3D graphene hydrogel for improved electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Carbon 2017, 116, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhu, C.B.; Mu, X.K.; van Aken, P.A.; Yu, Y.; Maier, J. Single-Layered Ultrasmall Nanoplates of MoS2 Embedded in Carbon Nanofibers with Excellent Electrochemical Performance for Lithium and Sodium Storage. Angew. Chem.-Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 2152–2156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Chen, Y.M.; Yu, X.Y.; Li, Z.; Paik, U.; Lou, X.W. Hierarchical MoS2 tubular structures internally wired by carbon nanotubes as a highly stable anode material for lithium-ion batteries. Sci. Adv. 2016, 2, e1600021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Yu, H.L.; Zhu, C.L.; Zhang, K.; Chen, Y.J.; Li, C.Y.; Gao, P.; Yang, P.P.; Ouyang, Q.Y. Three-dimensional hierarchical MoS2 nanoflake array/carbon cloth as high-performance flexible lithium-ion battery anodes. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 4551–4557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, A.N.; Hu, Y.Z.; Yu, M.P.; Liu, X.W.; Li, M.G. In situ growth of MoS2 on carbon nanofibers with enhanced electrochemical catalytic activity for the hydrogen evolution. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2017, 42, 9419–9427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Srivastava, S.K.; Kartick, B.; Choudhury, S.; Stamm, M. Thermally fabricated MoS2-graphene hybrids as high performance anode in lithium ion battery. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2016, 183, 383–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Koroteev, V.O.; Bulushev, D.A.; Chuvilin, A.L.; Okotrub, A.V.; Bulusheva, L.G. Nanometer-Sized MoS2 Clusters on Graphene Flakes for Catalytic Formic Acid Decomposition. ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 3950–3956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, Y.F.; Guo, Y.J.; Chen, W.T.; Luo, Q.; Lu, W.L.; Xu, P.; Chen, D.L.; Yin, X.; He, M. Sulfur-doped reduced graphene oxide/MoS2 composite with exposed active sites as efficient Pt-free counter electrode for dye-sensitized solar cell. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 452, 232–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, J.L.; Qin, W.; Xie, J.P.; Lin, R.; Wang, Z.L.; Pan, L.K.; Mai, W.J. Rational design of MoS2-reduced graphene oxide sponges as free-standing anodes for sodium-ion batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 332, 260–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jiang, L.F.; Lin, B.H.; Li, X.M.; Song, X.F.; Xia, H.; Li, L.; Zeng, H.B. Monolayer MoS2-Graphene Hybrid Aerogels with Controllable Porosity for Lithium-Ion Batteries with High Reversible Capacity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 2680–2687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ji, H.M.; Luan, A.L.; Dai, C.C.; Li, M.; Yang, G.; Hou, W.H. Highly active free-standing and flexible MoS2/rGO sandwich-structured films for supercapacitor applications. Solid State Commun. 2019, 297, 45–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, Z.; Chen, T.; Chen, W.X.; Chang, K.; Ma, L.; Huang, G.C.; Chen, D.Y.; Lee, J.Y. CTAB-assisted synthesis of single-layer MoS2-graphene composites as anode materials of Li-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 2202–2210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, J.H.; Wang, H.K.; Wei, W.; Meng, L.J. Advanced MoS2 and graphene heterostructures as high-performance anode for sodium-ion batteries. Nanotechnology 2019, 30, 104003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Xiang, J.Y.; Dong, D.D.; Wen, F.S.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, X.Y.; Wang, L.M.; Liu, Z.Y. Microwave synthesized self-standing electrode of MoS2 nanosheets assembled on graphene foam for high-performance Li-Ion and Na-Ion batteries. J. Alloy. Compd. 2016, 660, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, J.L.; Liu, X.J.; Pan, L.K.; Qin, W.; Chen, T.Q.; Sun, Z. MoS2-reduced graphene oxide composites synthesized via a microwave-assisted method for visible-light photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue. Rsc Adv. 2014, 4, 9647–9651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, S.L.; Min, H.H.; Xu, F.; Tong, L.; Chen, J.; Zhu, C.Y.; Sun, L.T. All electrochemical fabrication of MoS2/graphene counter electrodes for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 34546–34552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wan, X.; Chen, K.; Chen, Z.F.; Xie, F.Y.; Zeng, X.L.; Xie, W.G.; Chen, J.; Xu, J.B. Controlled Electrochemical Deposition of Large-Area MoS2 on Graphene for High-Responsivity Photodetectors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1603998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chen, X.P.; Zhang, L.L.; Chen, S.S. Large area CVD growth of graphene. Synth. Met. 2015, 210, 95–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Vabbina, P.; Choudhary, N.; Chowdhury, A.A.; Sinha, R.; Karabiyik, M.; Das, S.; Choi, W.; Pala, N. Highly Sensitive Wide Bandwidth Photodetector Based on Internal Photoemission in CVD Grown p-Type MoS2/Graphene Schottky Junction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 15206–15213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Gnanasekar, P.; Periyanagounder, D.; Kulandaivel, J. Vertically aligned MoS2 nanosheets on graphene for highly stable electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution reactions. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 2439–2446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Biroju, R.K.; Pal, S.; Sharma, R.; Giri, P.K.; Narayanan, T.N. Stacking sequence dependent photo-electrocatalytic performance of CVD grown MoS2/graphene van der Waals solids. Nanotechnology 2017, 28, 085101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Chen, K.; Li, C.; Chen, Z.L.; Shi, L.R.; Reddy, S.; Meng, H.; Ji, Q.Q.; Zhang, Y.F.; Liu, Z.F. Bioinspired synthesis of CVD graphene flakes and graphene-supported molybdenum sulfide catalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction. Nano Res. 2016, 9, 249–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kumar, R.; Dias, W.; Rubira, R.J.G.; Alaferdov, A.V.; Vaz, A.R.; Singh, R.K.; Teixeira, S.R.; Constantino, C.J.L.; Moshkalev, S.A. Simple and Fast Approach for Synthesis of Reduced Graphene Oxide-MoS(2)Hybrids for Room Temperature Gas Detection. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2018, 65, 3943–3949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Venkatesan, A.; Rathi, S.; Lee, I.Y.; Park, J.; Lim, D.; Kang, M.; Joh, H.I.; Kim, G.H.; Kannan, E.S. Molybdenum disulfide nanoparticles decorated reduced graphene oxide: Highly sensitive and selective hydrogen sensor. Nanotechnology 2017, 28, 365501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Xing, L.W.; Ma, Z.F. A glassy carbon electrode modified with a nanocomposite consisting of MoS2 and reduced graphene oxide for electrochemical simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid, dopamine, and uric acid. Microchim. Acta 2016, 183, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Huang, K.J.; Wang, L.; Li, J.; Liu, Y.M. Electrochemical sensing based on layered MoS2-graphene composites. Sens. Actuator B-Chem. 2013, 178, 671–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. He, B.S.; Yan, D.D. Au/ERGO nanoparticles supported on Cu-based metal-organic framework as a novel sensor for sensitive determination of nitrite. Food Control 2019, 103, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Li, Y.; Cheng, C.; Yang, Y.P.; Dun, X.J.; Gao, J.M.; Jin, X.J. A novel electrochemical sensor based on CuO/H-C3N4/rGO nanocomposite for efficient electrochemical sensing nitrite. J. Alloy. Compd. 2019, 798, 764–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Suma, B.P.; Adarakatti, P.S.; Kempahanumakkagari, S.K.; Malingappa, P. A new polyoxometalate/rGO/Pani composite modified electrode for electrochemical sensing of nitrite and its application to food and environmental samples. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2019, 229, 269–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wang, P.; Wang, M.Y.; Zhou, F.Y.; Yang, G.H.; Qu, L.L.; Miao, X.M. Development of a paper-based, inexpensive, and disposable electrochemical sensing platform for nitrite detection. Electrochem. Commun. 2017, 81, 74–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hu, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, Z.T.; Liu, J.; Shi, J.F.; Li, G.; Li, P.W.; Zhang, W.D.; Lian, K.; Zhuiykov, S. Synthesis and electrochemical properties of rGO-MoS2 heterostructures for highly sensitive nitrite detection. Ionics 2018, 24, 577–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Govindasamy, M.; Mani, V.; Chen, S.M.; Karthik, R.; Manibalan, K.; Umamaheswari, R. MoS2 Flowers Grown on Graphene/Carbon Nanotubes: A Versatile Substrate for Electrochemical Determination of Hydrogen Peroxide. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2016, 11, 2954–2961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Govindasamy, M.; Chen, S.M.; Mani, V.; Akilarasan, M.; Kogularasu, S.; Subramani, B. Nanocomposites composed of layered molybdenum disulfide and graphene for highly sensitive amperometric determination of methyl parathion. Microchim. Acta 2017, 184, 725–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Deo, R.P.; Wang, J.; Block, I.; Mulchandani, A.; Joshi, K.A.; Trojanowicz, M.; Scholz, F.; Chen, W.; Lin, Y.H. Determination of organophosphate pesticides at a carbon nanotube/organophosphorus hydrolase electrochemical biosensor. Anal. Chim. Acta 2005, 530, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kiransan, K.D.; Topcu, E. Free-standing and Flexible MoS2/rGO Paper Electrode for Amperometric Detection of Folic Acid. Electroanalysis 2018, 30, 810–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yoon, J.; Lee, T.; Bapurao, G.B.; Jo, J.; Oh, B.K.; Choi, J.W. Electrochemical H2O2 biosensor composed of myoglobin on MoS2 nanoparticle-graphene oxide hybrid structure. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 93, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Oohora, K.; Onoda, A.; Hayashi, T. Hemoproteins Reconstituted with Artificial Metal Complexes as Biohybrid Catalysts. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019, 52, 945–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Yoon, J.; Shin, J.W.; Lim, J.; Mohammadniaei, M.; Bapurao, G.B.; Lee, T.; Choi, J.W. Electrochemical nitric oxide biosensor based on amine-modified MoS2/graphene oxide/myoglobin hybrid. Colloid Surf. B-Biointerfaces 2017, 159, 729–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Zhang, K.J.; Sun, H.; Hou, S.F. Layered MoS2-graphene composites for biosensor applications with sensitive electrochemical performance. Anal. Methods 2016, 8, 3780–3787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Liu, H.; Chen, X.J.; Su, X.; Duan, C.Y.; Guo, K.; Zhu, Z.F. Flower-like MoS2 Modified Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanocomposite: Synthesis and Application for Lithium-Ion Batteries and Mediator-Free Biosensor. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2015, 162, B312–B318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Jeong, J.M.; Yang, M.; Kim, D.S.; Lee, T.J.; Choi, B.G.; Kim, D.H. High performance electrochemical glucose sensor based on three-dimensional MoS2/graphene aerogel. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 506, 379–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Wang, Z.Y.; Dong, S.; Gui, M.X.; Asif, M.; Wang, W.; Wang, F.; Liu, H.F. Graphene paper supported MoS2 nanocrystals monolayer with Cu submicron-buds: High-performance flexible platform for sensing in sweat. Anal. Biochem. 2018, 543, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Lin, X.Y.; Ni, Y.N.; Kokot, S. Electrochemical and bio-sensing platform based on a novel 3D Cu nano-flowers/layered MoS2 composite. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 79, 685–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Chen, H.; Fan, G.K.; Zhao, J.; Qiu, M.J.; Sun, P.; Fu, Y.F.; Han, D.X.; Cui, G.F. A portable micro glucose sensor based on copper-based nanocomposite structure. New J. Chem. 2019, 43, 7806–7813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Vasilescu, I.; Eremia, S.A.V.; Kusko, M.; Radoi, A.; Vasile, E.; Radu, G.L. Molybdenum disulphide and graphene quantum dots as electrode modifiers for laccase biosensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 75, 232–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhang, Y.; Lai, B.S.; Juhas, M. Recent Advances in Aptamer Discovery and Applications. Molecules 2019, 24, 941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Yuan, Y.H.; Li, L.L.; Zhao, M.; Zhou, J.; Chen, Z.H.; Bai, L. An aptamer based voltammetric biosensor for endotoxins using a functionalized graphene and molybdenum disulfide composite as a new nanocarrier. Analyst 2019, 144, 1253–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Geleta, G.S.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, Z.X. A novel reduced graphene oxide/molybdenum disulfide/polyaniline nanocomposite-based electrochemical aptasensor for detection of aflatoxin B-1. Analyst 2018, 143, 1644–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Chekin, F.; Bagga, K.; Subramanian, P.; Jijie, R.; Singh, S.K.; Kurungot, S.; Boukherroub, R.; Szunerits, S. Nucleic aptamer modified porous reduced graphene oxide/MoS2 based electrodes for viral detection: Application to human papillomavirus (HPV). Sens. Actuator B-Chem. 2018, 262, 991–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Tian, L.; Qi, J.X.; Qian, K.; Oderinde, O.; Cai, Y.Y.; Yao, C.; Song, W.; Wang, Y.H. An ultrasensitive electrochemical cytosensor based on the magnetic field assisted binanozymes synergistic catalysis of Fe3O4 nanozyme and reduced graphene oxide/molybdenum disulfide nanozyme. Sens. Actuator B-Chem. 2018, 260, 676–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 24 03374 g001 550
Figure 1. (A) TEM images and (B) HRTEM images of vertically aligned exfolliated graphite and MoS2 composite. From Wang et al. [22]. (C) Schematic illustration of the formation of the graphene/MoS2/amorphous carbon composite. From Teng et al. [23]. (D) FE-SEM and (E) TEM images of the MoS2 and carbon nanofiber composite. The insert shows the TEM image of a single MoS2 and carbon nanofiber nanostructure. From Li et al. [29].
Figure 1. (A) TEM images and (B) HRTEM images of vertically aligned exfolliated graphite and MoS2 composite. From Wang et al. [22]. (C) Schematic illustration of the formation of the graphene/MoS2/amorphous carbon composite. From Teng et al. [23]. (D) FE-SEM and (E) TEM images of the MoS2 and carbon nanofiber composite. The insert shows the TEM image of a single MoS2 and carbon nanofiber nanostructure. From Li et al. [29].
Molecules 24 03374 g001
Molecules 24 03374 g002 550
Figure 2. (A) Schematic representation showing synthesis of S-doped reduced graphene oxide (rGO)/MoS2 composite. From Wang et al. [32]. (B) Low-magnification and (C) high-magnification TEM images of rGO/MoS2 composite fabricated by one-pot microwave synthesis. From Li et al. [37]. (D) Schematic diagram of the chemical bath deposition of MoS2 on graphene as the anode and carbon rod as the cathode. From Wan et al. [41]. (E) Schematic of the two-zone chemical vapor deposition (CVD) furnace utilized for the synthesis of vertical MoS2 on graphene. From Gnanasekar et al. [44].
Figure 2. (A) Schematic representation showing synthesis of S-doped reduced graphene oxide (rGO)/MoS2 composite. From Wang et al. [32]. (B) Low-magnification and (C) high-magnification TEM images of rGO/MoS2 composite fabricated by one-pot microwave synthesis. From Li et al. [37]. (D) Schematic diagram of the chemical bath deposition of MoS2 on graphene as the anode and carbon rod as the cathode. From Wan et al. [41]. (E) Schematic of the two-zone chemical vapor deposition (CVD) furnace utilized for the synthesis of vertical MoS2 on graphene. From Gnanasekar et al. [44].
Molecules 24 03374 g002
Molecules 24 03374 g003 550
Figure 3. (A) Cyclic voltammetry CV curves of the glassy carbon electrode (GCE), GCE modified with rGO, MoS2 and rGO/MoS2 in 0.1 M PBS (pH = 7.0) with 500 μM nitrite. (B) CV curves of the GCE modified with rGO/MoS2 in 0.1 M PBS (pH = 7.0) under different concentrations of nitrite: 100, 300, 500, 700, and 1000 μM (scan rate: 50 mV∙s−1). Both from Hu et al. [55]. (C) CV curves of rGO (black) and rGO/MoS2 paper electrodes in 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.0) with (blue) and without (red) 2.0 mM folic acid (FA). Scan rate: 50 mV∙s−1. Inset: Structure of FA. (D) The CVs of the same concentrations of ascorbic acid (AA, blue line), uric acid (UA, green line) and FA (black line) and 1.0 mM AA, 0.5 mM UA and 0.5 mM FA containing solution (red line) at the rGO/MoS2 composite paper electrode in pH 7.0 PBS. Scan rate: 50 mV∙ s−1. Both from Kiransan et al. [59].
Figure 3. (A) Cyclic voltammetry CV curves of the glassy carbon electrode (GCE), GCE modified with rGO, MoS2 and rGO/MoS2 in 0.1 M PBS (pH = 7.0) with 500 μM nitrite. (B) CV curves of the GCE modified with rGO/MoS2 in 0.1 M PBS (pH = 7.0) under different concentrations of nitrite: 100, 300, 500, 700, and 1000 μM (scan rate: 50 mV∙s−1). Both from Hu et al. [55]. (C) CV curves of rGO (black) and rGO/MoS2 paper electrodes in 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.0) with (blue) and without (red) 2.0 mM folic acid (FA). Scan rate: 50 mV∙s−1. Inset: Structure of FA. (D) The CVs of the same concentrations of ascorbic acid (AA, blue line), uric acid (UA, green line) and FA (black line) and 1.0 mM AA, 0.5 mM UA and 0.5 mM FA containing solution (red line) at the rGO/MoS2 composite paper electrode in pH 7.0 PBS. Scan rate: 50 mV∙ s−1. Both from Kiransan et al. [59].
Molecules 24 03374 g003
Molecules 24 03374 g004 550
Figure 4. (A) Schematic of electrochemical biosensors composed of myoglobin (Mb) and of GO/MoS2 with electrochemical enhancement for H2O2 detection. From Yoon et al. [60]. (B) Schematic representation of construction and the detection principle of screen-printed carbon electrode modified with graphene quantum dots, MoS2 and laccase as a caffeic acid biosensor. From Vasilescu et al. [69]. (C) Schematic representation of the reduced graphene oxide/molybdenum disulfide/polyaniline nanocomposite-based electrochemical aptasensor for detection of aflatoxin B1 fabrication. (D) Differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) responses of the aptasensor after 20 min incubation with 0.0100, 0.0156, 0.0313, 0.0625, 0.125, and 1.00 fg∙mL−1 AFB1. Both from Geleta et al. [72]. (E) Schematic illustration of magnetic beads assisted bi-nanozyme signal amplification for detection of circulating tumor cells. (F) DPV responses to MCF-7/aptamer/Fe3O4NPs/rGO/MoS2/GCE-fabricated cytosensor after capturing different concentrations of MCF-7 cells from (a) to (h): 0, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40 and 45 cells∙mL−1 in 0.01M PBS (pH=5.0) with 0.1mM of H2O2 and 0.2mM of TMB. Both from Tian et al. [74].
Figure 4. (A) Schematic of electrochemical biosensors composed of myoglobin (Mb) and of GO/MoS2 with electrochemical enhancement for H2O2 detection. From Yoon et al. [60]. (B) Schematic representation of construction and the detection principle of screen-printed carbon electrode modified with graphene quantum dots, MoS2 and laccase as a caffeic acid biosensor. From Vasilescu et al. [69]. (C) Schematic representation of the reduced graphene oxide/molybdenum disulfide/polyaniline nanocomposite-based electrochemical aptasensor for detection of aflatoxin B1 fabrication. (D) Differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) responses of the aptasensor after 20 min incubation with 0.0100, 0.0156, 0.0313, 0.0625, 0.125, and 1.00 fg∙mL−1 AFB1. Both from Geleta et al. [72]. (E) Schematic illustration of magnetic beads assisted bi-nanozyme signal amplification for detection of circulating tumor cells. (F) DPV responses to MCF-7/aptamer/Fe3O4NPs/rGO/MoS2/GCE-fabricated cytosensor after capturing different concentrations of MCF-7 cells from (a) to (h): 0, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40 and 45 cells∙mL−1 in 0.01M PBS (pH=5.0) with 0.1mM of H2O2 and 0.2mM of TMB. Both from Tian et al. [74].
Molecules 24 03374 g004

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kudr, J.; Adam, V.; Zitka, O. Fabrication of Graphene/Molybdenum Disulfide Composites and Their Usage as Actuators for Electrochemical Sensors and Biosensors. Molecules 2019, 24, 3374. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24183374

AMA Style

Kudr J, Adam V, Zitka O. Fabrication of Graphene/Molybdenum Disulfide Composites and Their Usage as Actuators for Electrochemical Sensors and Biosensors. Molecules. 2019; 24(18):3374. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24183374

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kudr, Jiri, Vojtech Adam, and Ondrej Zitka. 2019. "Fabrication of Graphene/Molybdenum Disulfide Composites and Their Usage as Actuators for Electrochemical Sensors and Biosensors" Molecules 24, no. 18: 3374. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24183374

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop