Next Article in Journal
Nanocapsular Dispersion of Cinnamaldehyde for Enhanced Inhibitory Activity against Aflatoxin Production by Aspergillus flavus
Previous Article in Journal
Potential of Start Codon Targeted (SCoT) Markers to Estimate Genetic Diversity and Relationships among Chinese Elymus sibiricus Accessions
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 20
Issue 4
10.3390/molecules20046002
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Organic-Inorganic Hybrid Nanoparticles for Bacterial Inhibition: Synthesis and Characterization of Doped and Undoped ONPs with Ag/Au NPs

by
Carlos Alberto Huerta Aguilar
1,
Adriana Berenice Pérez Jiménez
1,
Antonio Romero Silva
1,
Navneet Kaur
2,
Pandiyan Thangarasu
1,*,
Jorge Manuel Vázquez Ramos
1 and
Narinder Singh
3
1
Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, 04510 México D.F., Mexico
2
Centre for Nanoscience & Nanotechnology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, Panjab 160014, India
3
Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Ropar, Rupnagar, Panjab 140001, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2015, 20(4), 6002-6021; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules20046002
Submission received: 21 January 2015 / Revised: 9 March 2015 / Accepted: 17 March 2015 / Published: 7 April 2015
(This article belongs to the Section Organic Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Organic nanoparticles (ONPs) of lipoic acid and its doped derivatives ONPs/Ag and ONPs/Au were prepared and characterized by UV-Visible, EDS, and TEM analysis. The antibacterial properties of the ONPs ONPs/Ag and ONPs/Au were tested against bacterial strains (Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhi). Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and bacterial growth inhibition tests show that ONPs/Ag are more effective in limiting bacterial growth than other NPs, particularly, for Gram positive than for Gram-negative ones. The order of bacterial cell growth inhibition was ONPs/Ag > ONPs > ONPs/Au. The morphology of the cell membrane for the treated bacteria was analyzed by SEM. The nature of bond formation of LA with Ag or Au was analyzed by molecular orbital and density of state (DOS) using DFT.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The use of diverse nanomaterials as antibacterial agents is growing due to their small size, which ensures desirable contact with bacterial cells; in particular, harmless materials that can effectively inhibit bacterial growth is potentially important for preserving packaged food, pharmaceutical and cosmetic products [1]. However, most of the studies are focused on inorganic nanoparticles such as AgNPs [2,3,4,5,6], AuNPs [7,8,9], CuNPs [10,11], ZnONPs [12,13,14], TiO2 [15], ZnO/Ag, TiO2/Cu or Ag/Au NPs [16,17,18,19,20,21] as antibacterial agents. Yet some of these materials are toxic [22,23], expensive [24] or hard to apply due to their low stability [25,26].
Although inorganic-based NPs are effective at inhibiting bacterial growth, their accumulation in biological tissues or in food materials can cause serious problems (damage vital organs) as they are non-biodegradable. On the other hand, organic molecules such as ampicillin, amoxicillin, benzylpenicilllin, bleomycin, cefamandole, levofloxacin, clarithromycin, lincomycin and tetracyclines (antibiotics), and amphotericin, griseofulvin, metronidazole (antifungals) have been shown as efficient antibacterial or anti-viral agents. The accumulation of these molecules in biological systems is much lower and they are easily biodegradable. Thus, the study of nanoparticles based on organic compounds (ONPs) has become an interesting topic. Nevertheless, reports on ONPs in the literature are limited, and most of them are focused on polymers, such as chitosan NPs [27,28,29]. The electronic/optical properties of ONPs are important because their van der Waals intermolecular forces, hydrogen-bonding interactions, and electrostatic attractions are fundamentally different from those of inorganic metals or semiconductors [30]. The changes in their physical and chemical properties increase exponentially with the surface area from NPs to bulk materials [31,32]
α-Lipoic acid (LA), which is present in eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells [33], functions as a cofactor for mitochondrial α-ketoacid dehydrogenases, and it forms a “universal antioxidant” redox couple with dehydrolipoic acid (DLA) [34]. LA plays a key role in the regeneration of biological antioxidants such as vitamin C (D/L-ascorbic acid) and vitamin E [35], sequestration of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS), regulation of redox processes, and manipulation of gene expression and apoptosis [35]. Several authors have studied the catalytic and biological applications of LA because of its biocompatibility [36,37,38,39,40], and its use as a biocompatible-stabilizing agent [41,42]. The presence of a disulfide (dithiolane ring) in the LA structure facilitates an interaction with metallic NPs, especially with AuNPs and AgNPs [43], which can enhance their antibacterial effects. In the literature, the antibacterial properties of ONPs (lipoic acid) and their nanohybrids ONPs/Ag and ONPs/Au have not been reported yet. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of ONPs, ONPs/Ag and ONPs/Au against four different Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Furthermore, the toxicity of the organic molecule or its binding with metal is closely related to the structural and electronic parameters, thus the geometrical and electronic properties of LA are analyzed by Density Functional Theory (DFT) in order to support the antibacterial effect.

2. Results and Discussion

Aqueous colloidal suspensions of ONPs (α-lipoic acid) and the hybrids ONPs/Ag and ONPs/Au were prepared (see Figure 1a,b). All the NPs were characterized by UV-visible spectrophotometry, Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) [44] and Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy (EDS) [44].
Molecules 20 06002 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Formation of α-lipoic acid ONPs; (b) preparation of ONPs/Ag and ONPs/Au.
Figure 1. (a) Formation of α-lipoic acid ONPs; (b) preparation of ONPs/Ag and ONPs/Au.
Molecules 20 06002 g001
The size and morphology of the samples were determined by TEM (25,000× magnification) to provide a representative number of particles [45] (Figure S1). The data (Figure 2) show that ONPs are round shaped (~5.0 nm) (Figure 2a), and ONPs/Ag and ONPs/Au appear as dark particles due to the existence of high density Ag or Au atoms (Figure 2b,c), in agreement with a published report [46]. The particle diameters and size distributions of ONPs/Ag (~13.0 nm) and ONPs/Au (~8.0 nm) are smaller than those of the analogous AgNPs (Figure 2d) and AuNPs (Figure 2e) and the particles are of different sizes, however, a uniform size was obtained after preparing hybrid ONPs/Ag or ONPs/Au (Supplementary Material S1).
Molecules 20 06002 g002 550
Figure 2. Transmission Electron Microscope micrographs: (a) ONPs; (b) ONPs/Ag (ratio 10:1); (c) ONPs/Au (ratio 10:1); (d) Ag NPs and (e) Au NPs.
Figure 2. Transmission Electron Microscope micrographs: (a) ONPs; (b) ONPs/Ag (ratio 10:1); (c) ONPs/Au (ratio 10:1); (d) Ag NPs and (e) Au NPs.
Molecules 20 06002 g002
This suggests that ONPs act as a size controlling agent and prevent the aggregation of metallic nuclei. It was observed that the ONPs/Au particles are more homogeneous than ONPs/Ag.
The EDS study was performed by sampling at 15 different spots in the TEM analyses grid, and the results (Figure 3) show the presence of C, S and O in the ONPs. A signal that corresponds to C, confirms the organic nature of ONPs, however, the quantification of the carbon content is difficult due to interference from the carbon coated grid in the TEM and EDS analysis. The presence of Ag or Au in ONPs/Ag or ONPs/Au is also confirmed by the TEM-EDS. The signal related to Cu commonly appears in EDS because of its presence in the grid.
Molecules 20 06002 g003 550
Figure 3. Energy Dispersive Spectrometry analysis: (a) ONPs, (b) ONPs/Ag (ratio 10:1), (c) ONPs/Au (ratio 10:1).
Figure 3. Energy Dispersive Spectrometry analysis: (a) ONPs, (b) ONPs/Ag (ratio 10:1), (c) ONPs/Au (ratio 10:1).
Molecules 20 06002 g003

2.1. Optical Properties of ONPs, ONPs/Ag and ONPs/Au

The band at 333 nm in the UV-visible absorption spectrum for lipoic acid in THF (Figure 4), also appeared with high intensity in the ONPs [31,32]. The spectral behavior of LA-ONP/Ag is significantly modified compared to that of ONPs (Figure 4) showing a high intensity peak (333 nm) along with a shoulder band (~475 nm). This indicates the existence of a strong interaction between metallic NPs and ONPs.
Molecules 20 06002 g004 550
Figure 4. Characterization of ONPs; (a) visible appearance: (i) ONPs; (ii) ONPs/Ag and (iii) ONPs/Au; (b) UV-Visible profile of lipoic acid-ONPs.
Figure 4. Characterization of ONPs; (a) visible appearance: (i) ONPs; (ii) ONPs/Ag and (iii) ONPs/Au; (b) UV-Visible profile of lipoic acid-ONPs.
Molecules 20 06002 g004

2.2. Antibacterial Activities of ONPs, ONPs/Ag and ONPs/Au

The antibacterial properties of ONPs, ONPs/Ag and ONPs/Au were evaluated against Gram positive (Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus cereus), and Gram negative (Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhi) bacteria. Results (Figure 5, Table 1) show that ONPs, ONPs/Ag and ONPs/Au have considerable inhibitory effects against both Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria.
Molecules 20 06002 g005 550
Figure 5. Antibacterial effects: Bacterial survival (%) after treatment with different NPs (0.2 mM).
Figure 5. Antibacterial effects: Bacterial survival (%) after treatment with different NPs (0.2 mM).
Molecules 20 06002 g005
The qualitative tests (Figure 5) reveal the following inhibition trend: ONPs/Ag > ONPs > ONPs/Au. Furthermore, the number of viable microorganisms decreases when NPs are added to the medium (Figure 6 and Figure S2). Figure 6 describes only the growth rate of bacteria for the different types of NPs. After addition of NPs onto the surface of the Mueller Hinton agar-filled plates, these were then shaken completely in order to get a uniform distribution of NPs in the solution for the bacterial culture at 36 °C for 36 h. The greatest difference between the control (1a, 2a) and treated samples was seen for ONPs/Ag (1d, 2d), so the inhibition effect is higher for ONPs/Ag than for ONPs (1c, 2c) or Ag NPs (1b, 2b), indicating that there is a synergic effect between ONPs and AgNPs.
Table
Table 1. Minimal Inhibitory concentration of different bacteria treated NPs.
Table 1. Minimal Inhibitory concentration of different bacteria treated NPs.
InhibitorMinimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) [44] [mmol/L]
Gram (+)Gram (−)
Bacillus. cereusStaphylococcus aureusEscherichia coliSalmonella typhi
ONPs0.31 ± 0.040.39 ± 0.030.39 ± 0.050.39 ± 0.04
ONPs/Ag0.26 ± 0.050.26 ± 0.050.22 ± 0.020.22 ± 0.03
ONPs/Au0.39 ± 0.110.44 ± 0.020.44 ± 0.090.44 ± 0..04
Ag-NPs0.17 ± 0.040.17 ± 0.030.13 ± 0.010.13 ± 0.05
Au-NPs1.76 ± 0.051.82 ± 0.051.28 ± 0.071.12 ± 0.09
Molecules 20 06002 g006 550
Figure 6. Comparative bacterial growth inhibition (1) Salmonella typhi and (2) Staphylococcus aureus: after treatment (a) Control; (b) AgNPs (0.02 mM); (c) ONPs (0.2 mM); (d) ONPs/Ag (0.2 mM).
Figure 6. Comparative bacterial growth inhibition (1) Salmonella typhi and (2) Staphylococcus aureus: after treatment (a) Control; (b) AgNPs (0.02 mM); (c) ONPs (0.2 mM); (d) ONPs/Ag (0.2 mM).
Molecules 20 06002 g006
After measuring bacterial growth at different concentrations (Figure S3), it was observed that the antibacterial effectiveness greatly increases with increasing concentration of NPs. For all ONPs (undoped or doped), there is no significant difference in optical density at low concentrations (0.05 to 0.2 mM); but cell death occurs at higher concentration, indicating a possible perturbation of the cytoplasmic membrane (see SEM analysis) [47].
The MIC values show that ONPs are more effective in growth control for Gram-positive than for Gram-negative bacteria (Figure 7), and they indicates the minimum amount of NPs required to avoid bacterial growth (mmol/L). This behavior can be explained by the fact that Gram-negative species possess an outer membrane, which acts as an intrinsic barrier for hydrophobic agents due to the presence of negatively charged phosphate in lipopolysaccharides (LPS) [48] along with hydrophobic lipid elements. In contrast, the Gram positive cell wall does not restrict the diffusion of hydrophobic ONPs [49].
Molecules 20 06002 g007 550
Figure 7. Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of bacteria treated with different NPs.
Figure 7. Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of bacteria treated with different NPs.
Molecules 20 06002 g007
The disk diffusion data (Figure 8) show that there is no antibacterial activity with ONPs, probably because of the small size ONPs that can easily diffuse through agar plates, resulting in a low content of NPs in the medium.
Molecules 20 06002 g008 550
Figure 8. Disk diffusion test: (a) Staphylococcus aureus; (b) Salmonella typhi.
Figure 8. Disk diffusion test: (a) Staphylococcus aureus; (b) Salmonella typhi.
Molecules 20 06002 g008
Interestingly, bacterial growth decreased further when the strains were treated with ONPs/Ag (lower MIC values), showing a higher inhibitory effect against Gram negative strains. This suggests that the presence of Ag atoms on ONPs induces a strong antimicrobial action by facilitating the interaction between microbial cells and NPs. The MIC values determined for AgNPs (Table 1) are slightly smaller than those of ONPs/Ag; however, a very low amount of Ag was employed (ratio 10:1) to prepare ONPs/Ag, showing that there is a significant effect in bacterial inhibition.
AgNPs were tested at two different concentrations: 5.0 mM for all NPs, and 0.5 mM, representing the low amount of Ag in the ONPs/Ag (ratio 10:1). This lower concentration was considered in order to prove whether the bacterial effect was caused by Ag NPs or by a possible synergic effect of Ag and ONPs. The results (Figure 6 and Table 2) show that there is no significant difference in the diameter obtained at both concentrations, confirming that ONPs do not alter the antibacterial activity in solid medium.
Table
Table 2. Antibacterial parameters for different bacteria treated with different NPs.
Table 2. Antibacterial parameters for different bacteria treated with different NPs.
Inhibition Zone Diameter (mm) *
MaterialConcentration [44]Bacillus cereusStaphylococcus aureusEscherichia coliSalmonella typhi
ONPs5.0NPNPNPNP
ONPs/Ag5.07.0 ± 0.167.6 ± 0.129.3 ± 0.139.0 ± 0.10
ONPs/Ag0.57.0 ± 0.118 ± 0.099.7 ± 0.129.3 ± 0.08
ONPs/Au5.012.0 ± 0.2111 ± 0.1013 ± 0.1413 ± 0.11
Ag-NPs5.0----
Au-NPs5.0----
* Inhibition zone diameter includes the paper disc diameter (6.0 mm) which contained stock solution (5.0 mM).
Although several possible mechanisms have been proposed to explain the toxicity of NPs to bacteria [50], we consider that the smaller size ONPs/Ag (<15 nm) first possibly adsorb onto the surface of the cell membrane, and then diffuse into the cell, hence affecting cell functions including replication and respiration [51]. Once inside the cell, Ag doped ONPs slowly oxidize to Ag+ ions and can inactivate proteins and/or intercalate between the purine and pyrimidine bases of DNA [52], and also bind with thiol groups of bacterial proteins, all of which lead to cell death [51,53,54,55]. Although the same antibacterial effect was expected for ONPs/Au as for ONPs/Ag, there is a decrease in the bacterial inhibition, even lower than that of ONPs. If the aggregation increases, the concentration of active NPs decreases, so the MIC value increases.
The reported toxicity of Ag+ and AgNPs [56] shows Ag+ ion to be more toxic than AgNPs, and the availability of soluble Ag+ is correlated with bacterial toxicity. The uptake of Ag+ ion is higher than of Ag because the direct uptake of AgNPs by cells is negligible. So, AgNPs are oxidized to Ag+, which then are taken up by cells. This was proved by using cysteine as ligand in the medium. The toxicity of Ag+ was analyzed in the presence and the absence of cysteine, which can coordinate with Ag+ to form a complex. In the presence of cysteine there is less soluble Ag+, resulting in a lower toxicity. In other reports, ROS can mediate between AgNPs and Ag+ via an electron-charging/discharging process [57,58] (superoxide reduces Ag+ to Ag [56], and H2O2 oxidizes AgNPs to Ag+). The ROS can also be produced under weak light (visible or IR). For example, the formation of ROS has been detected in the cell culture by EPR in visible light [59,60,61]; similarly, the generation of ROS has been found in the presence of infrared and visible light [62,63]. Although both AgNPs and Ag(I) are toxic to bacteria [64,65,66], and AgNPs cause cell death by damaging bacterial cell membranes by enhancing permeability and disturbing respiration [67], while Ag+ interacts strongly with the thiol groups of proteins [68] and severely disturbs bacterial membrane integrity thereby affecting DNA replication [69]. In addition, certain NPs can produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) through their reaction with oxygen [70,71] or light-involved generation of electron−hole pairs, causing the dissolution of NPs. However, there is no clarity in the mode of action with cells, and it requires further study.
In the present work, we analyzed the presence of soluble Ag+ in solution by adding NaCl solution to AgNPs suspension in order to verify whether Ag is present as NPs, or as Ag+, and only Ag present in AgNPs, was found. The bacterial growth inhibition (I, %) of different NPs was analyzed, and a synergistic effect for ONPs/Ag was found. The net inhibition (I) rate of Ag-ONPs is higher than the sum of ONPS and AgNPs as shown below:
I [Ag-ONPs] > (I [Ag] + I [ONPs])
The inhibition trend is as follows: ONPs/Ag > ONPs > ONPs/Au. ONPs/Ag exhibits a high inhibition to bacterial growth because of the synergistic effect, i.e., the particles diffuse into cells through the membrane, then AgNPs is slowly oxidized to Ag+ causing severe damage to cell functions (Ag/Ag+, Eoxidation = −0.80 V); simultaneously, ONPs (LA) yields as redox reaction with the components, so both effects lead to a quick cell death. With ONPs/Au, the oxidation of stable Au to Au+ is more difficult (Eoxidation = −1.50 V) than for Ag due to its higher oxidation potential, so the Au+ ion present inside the cell is negligible; however, AuNPs bind strongly with ONPs through the disulfide group, inhibiting the interaction of the particles with cell components, leading to low bacterial inhibition growth. In the case of ONPs, it involves only redox reaction with the cell components, so its inhibition is less than ONPs/Ag but it is higher than ONPS/Au.
The antibacterial effect of the NPs on E. coli and B. cereus was also analyzed by SEM to determine possible morphological changes in the cell membrane (Figure 9). The results (Figure 9a,d) show that there is no visible damage to the cell membrane after treatment with ONPs and this observation was consistent with several repeated experiments. This suggests that the small sized ONPs (~5 nm) can easily diffuse through cell membranes without causing perceptible damage and still cause cell death.
Molecules 20 06002 g009 550
Figure 9. SEM images of bacterial strains after treatment with NPs. (a) Bacillus cereus with ONPs; (b) Bacillus cereus with ONPs/Ag; (c) Bacillus cereus with Ag NPs; (d) Salmonella typhi with ONPs; (e) Salmonella typhi with ONPs/Ag and (f) Salmonella typhi with AgNPs.
Figure 9. SEM images of bacterial strains after treatment with NPs. (a) Bacillus cereus with ONPs; (b) Bacillus cereus with ONPs/Ag; (c) Bacillus cereus with Ag NPs; (d) Salmonella typhi with ONPs; (e) Salmonella typhi with ONPs/Ag and (f) Salmonella typhi with AgNPs.
Molecules 20 06002 g009
However, many holes were produced in the membranes of cells treated with ONPs/Ag (Figure 9b,e), similar to the bacteria treated with AgNPs (Figure 9c,f). Generally, metal NPs bind onto the cell surface due to the electrostatic interactions between NPs and the cell membrane because bacterial surfaces are known to be negatively charged [72] and metal NPs or metal oxide NPs are known to have a slightly positive charge [73], causing the deformation of cell walls. This affects bacterial functions through the interaction with other bacterial components, leading to bacterial death.

2.3. Computational Procedure

The toxicity and redox properties of the LA is directly related to its geometrical and electronic properties; the variation of these parameters during its binding with Ag or Au is also important, thus full optimization was performed for the LA-structure by Density Functional Theory (DFT) using Gaussian’09 at B3LYP with 6-311+G(d,p) basis set [74]. Polarizable Continuum Mode (IEF-PCM) was used to see the solvent effect in THF/water as solvent. Structural data were used to calculate Time-Dependent (TD-DFT) parameters and molecular orbital energies (Table 3) for LA to determine the UV-Vis absorbance [75,76]. Hybrid functional B3LYP with LANLDZ basis set was employed to optimize the complex structure (LA-Ag), and then the UV-visible spectrum was obtained through TD-DFT calculations. The MO energy data are consistent with the experimental results that the participation of molecular orbitals in bonding such as HOMO, HOMO-1, HOMO-2 with Ag is greater than those with Au because a smaller energy difference between the orbitals (HOMO-HOMO-1, 0.272 eV; HOMO-1-HOMO-2, 0.517 eV) was observed for LA-Ag than for LA-Au (HOMO-HOMO-1, 0.822 eV; HOMO-1-HOMO-2, 0.601 eV). This is an agreement with Density of State (DOS) that the appearance of orbitals (energy gap between the orbital) more uniform in HOMO level for LA-Ag than for LA-Au, showing that the binding of LA with metal is important for the bacterial deformation. In addition, the molecular orbitals which are located within disulfide ring, facilitate strong interaction with metals, particularly with Ag (small energy gap of HOMO-LUMO, 2.24 eV) than Au atom (HOMO-LUMO, 2.43 eV). For the case of LA, which involves the bonding directly with the cell components, it is difficult to compare with the interaction of LA with metals than that of with the cell components.
Table
Table 3. Frontier molecular orbital (FMOs) for LA and its decorated with Ag or Au.
Table 3. Frontier molecular orbital (FMOs) for LA and its decorated with Ag or Au.
Molecular OrbitalEnergy (eV)
LAAg-LAAu-LA
LUMO+30.0010.490−0.288
LUMO+2−0.0270.005−0.620
LUMO+1−0.310−0.599−2.637
LUMO−1.361−1.551−3.371
ΔE(HOMO-LUMO)4.4464.1362.433
HOMO−5.807−5.687−5.804
ΔE(HOMO-HOMO-1)1.9510.2720.822
HOMO-1−7.758−5.959−6.626
HOMO-2−8.073−6.476−7.227
HOMO-3−8.696−7.456−7.978
The DFT study (Figure 10) shows that two sulfur atoms are coordinated with Ag to form the complex structure, which is consistent with the electrostatic potential analysis, where negative charge was detected for sulfur and carboxylic acid-oxygen of LA. This also agrees with the electron density analysis that high electron density S and O atoms can act as good receptors, and coordinate with a metal ion (acceptor).
Molecules 20 06002 g010 550
Figure 10. Optimized structures of LA (a) and its forms decorated with Ag (b) or Au (c).
Figure 10. Optimized structures of LA (a) and its forms decorated with Ag (b) or Au (c).
Molecules 20 06002 g010
Density of states (DOS) was determined by Energy-DFT for both LA and LA-Ag complex; the results (Figure 11) show that a close energy gap for orbitals was observed for LA-Ag and wider for LA. For LA, with a high density of states, the individual electronic states are fused to form a wide band above LUMO + 3 levels, while for LA-Ag, there are orbitals involved in bonding with the metal (Figure 12) [77,78], so only a few independent states appeared, yielding a small energy gap at high energy (E = 3.8 eV, LUMO + 15).
Molecules 20 06002 g011 550
Figure 11. Density of states for LA, and its doping with metal atoms: (a) LA-ONPs; (b) Ag doped (1.0%) with LA-ONPs and (c) Au doped (1.0%) LA-ONPs calculated through B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) for LA and B3LYP/LANL2DZ for Ag/Au-LA.
Figure 11. Density of states for LA, and its doping with metal atoms: (a) LA-ONPs; (b) Ag doped (1.0%) with LA-ONPs and (c) Au doped (1.0%) LA-ONPs calculated through B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) for LA and B3LYP/LANL2DZ for Ag/Au-LA.
Molecules 20 06002 g011
Molecules 20 06002 g012 550
Figure 12. Frontier molecular orbitals: (a) LA; (b) LA/Ag.
Figure 12. Frontier molecular orbitals: (a) LA; (b) LA/Ag.
Molecules 20 06002 g012

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Materials and Methods

α-Lipoic acid, HAuCl4, AgNO3, and NaBH4 were used as received from Sigma-Aldrich (Mexico City, Mexico). Tetrahydrofuran (THF, J. T. Baker, Mexico City, Mexico) was employed to synthesize ONPs. The bacterial strains for cell culture were obtained from the Strain Bank (WFCC/WDCM-100) of the UNAM Faculty of Chemistry, and maintained in cysteine tryptic agar (CTA, BIOXON, Mexico City, Mexico). Mueller Hinton (DIBICO, Mexico City, Mexico) for inoculum dilution mixture, nutritive broth (DIBICO) for inoculum suspension and Petri dishes (90 × 15 mm) for cell culture and 96-wells plates were employed for the bacterial inhibition tests. Glutaraldehyde (25% purity) and absolute ethanol were used to prepare the samples for SEM analysis.

3.2. Equipment

All synthesized NPs were characterized by UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer 25, Waltham, MA, USA, range 270 nm to 1100 nm), Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM, JEOL 2010, Tokyo, Japan) with Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy (EDS). For TEM and EDS analysis, samples were prepared by dropping the NPs solution on a 300 mesh copper grid, which was allowed to dry, and coated with a thin layer of carbon. The morphology of the biological samples was also examined with a Quanta 400F field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA).

3.3. Experimental Procedures: Organic Nanoparticles (ONPs)

The LA ONPs of were prepared as reported previously [79]: α-lipoic acid (0.1 mM) dissolved in THF (1.5 mL) was slowly injected into deionized water (100 mL) under sonication to yield a turbid colloidal suspension of ONPs (10.0 mM).

3.4. Gold Doped-Organic Nanocomposites (ONPs/Au)

The colloidal solution of ONPs (50 mL, 10. 0 mM) was mixed with a solution of HAuCl4 (500 μL, 10 mM) to reach a final molar ratio of 10:1 (ONPs:Au). On addition of the Au3+ solution, the resulting solution turned red for a short time and then changed into a colorless solution. Finally, NaBH4 (200 μL, 10 mM) was added dropwise under vigorous stirring to yield the ONPs/Au.

3.5. Silver-Organic Nanocomposites (ONPs/Ag)

ONP/Ag was prepared by the reduction method: the ONPs suspension (10.0 mM) was added to a AgNO3 solution (20.0 μL, 50.0 mM) in a molar ratio of 10:1 (ONPs:Ag), and then NaBH4 (150 μL, 10.0 mM) was added drop-wise under stirring. The turbid suspension turned to a pale yellow-orange color.

3.6. Gold and Silver Nanoparticles

Au NPs or Ag NPs were synthesized by using NaBH4 (10.0 mM) in deionized water, and the resultant colloidal solutions were red (AuNPs) or yellow (Ag NPs).

3.7. Standardization of Inoculum Suspension

Inoculum suspensions were prepared with 24 h-old cultures of bacterial strains on nutritive agar using sterile saline solution (0.9% w/v) and then the bacterial concentration was adjusted to 0.5 on the standard McFarland scale.

3.8. Antibacterial Studies

The antibacterial properties of the ONPs were analyzed against four bacterial strains, two of which were Gram positive (Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus cereus) and the other two Gram negative (Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhi). The identity of the isolated bacterial strains was confirmed according to the microbiological guidelines [80]. The susceptibility of the bacterial strains with ONPs, ONPs/Ag, ONPs/Au, Ag NPs and Au NPs was evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively in order to compare the susceptibilities of simple and doped ONPs.

3.9. Microbiological Qualitative Assays

Antimicrobial activity of all NPs was examined in both solid and liquid culture media. The disk diffusion method [80,81] was employed in solid tests; Mueller Hinton agar plates were inoculated in the previously standardized inoculum suspension with using a sterile cotton-tipped swab; then, sterile paper discs (Whatman No.1, 6.0 mm in diameter) were impregnated with a 5.0 mM solution of the ONPs and were placed on the surface of the plates. The tests were carried out for ONPs/Ag, ONPs/Au, Ag NPs and Au NPs. Diameters of the growth inhibition zones were recorded in mm after incubating the plates for 24 h at 35 °C. Each experiment was carried out in triplicate.
Broth tests were performed by inoculating nutritive broth with bacterial strains (1 × 105 UFC/mL) by adding a stock solution of test material (ONPs, ONPs/Ag, ONPs/Au, AgNPs and AuNPs) to achieve a final concentration of 10.0 mM in ONPs content. An inoculated tube without inhibitor was used as positive control. Bacterial cultures were incubated for 24 h at 35 °C, and then the optical density at 600 nm was measured. An aliquot of each diluted sample was inoculated onto a sterile Mueller Hinton agar plate in order to compare viable microorganisms after treatment with the NPs.

3.10. Minimal Inhibitory Concentrations (MIC)

The modified microdilution method [82] was employed to determine the MIC for ONPs, ONPs/Ag, ONPs/Au, Ag NPs and Au NPs against different bacteria. Each well of microplates (96-wells) was filled with 0.1 mL of inoculated nutritive broth (final concentration 1 × 105 UFC/mL) and 0.1 mL of nanomaterial solution at the respective concentration. Different solutions were prepared from 10.0 mM stock solutions of each material (ONPs, ONPs/Ag, ONPs/Au, Ag NPs and Au NPs) to give a range of concentration from 0.05 to 0.50 mM. Microplates were incubated overnight, and then 10.0 µL of 10.0 mM aqueous p-iodonitrotetrazolium chloride solution was added to all wells to measure bacterial growth as determined by the development of a red color by the biologically active cells. MIC can be defined as the lowest concentration of ONPs, ONPs/Ag, ONPs/Au, AgNPs and AuNPs that generates a colorless well, showing a completely inhibited bacterial growth.

3.11. Morphological Analysis of Bacterial Cells Treatment with NPs

The effect of NPs (ONPs, ONPs/Ag, ONPs/Au and AgNPs) on the morphology of bacterial cells was analyzed by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) as described previously [83]. Bacterial samples, after exposure to MIC of each nanomaterial, were fixed with glutaraldehyde (2.5%) and then dehydrated with a series of ethanol solutions (30%, 50%, 70%, 90%, 95% and 100%). The dehydrated samples were dried by means of a critical point dryer (Auto- Samdri-815 Automatic Critical Point Dryer; Tousimis, Rockville, MD, USA). Each of the dried samples was placed onto SEM stubs and sputter-coated with gold using a cool-sputter coater (E5100 II, Polaron Instruments Inc., Hatfield, PA, USA). The cell damaged portions were then observed by using SEM at 20 kV secondary electrons, capturing the areas where morphological changes occurred in treated cells.

4. Conclusions

Three different organic and hybrid organic-metallic nanoparticles were tested as bacterial growth inhibition agents. The antibacterial studies showed that among all tested materials ONPs/Ag has the highest inhibition effect, while Au-containing materials revealed a low inhibitory effect. It was also shown that Gram positive bacteria are more susceptible to the inhibitory effect of the tested materials as compared to Gram negative strains. The order of bacterial cell growth inhibition was found to be ONPs/Ag > ONPs > ONPs/Au. The morphology of bacterial cells was analyzed before and after inhibition treatments showing that even though both ONPs and Ag-ONPs exert an effective growth control, only bacterial strains treated with silver nanoparticles showed membrane puncturing and perforation.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be accessed at: https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/20/04/6002/s1.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge economic support by the Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico (Project PAPIIT No IN217813) and also Ivan Puente Lee, Facultad de Química, for the SEM and TEM analysis. The authors also acknowledge Berenit Mendoza Garfias, Laboratorio de Microscopía, Instituto de Biología, UNAM, for dehydrating and drying the samples using a critical point dryer. N. Jayanthi, Universidad Politécnica del Valle de México (UPVM), México thanked for useful comments on the paper.

Author Contributions

Carlos Alberto Huerta Aguilar: Preparation of ONPs, doping of ONPs, bacterial analysis, and DFT calculations. Adriana Berenice Perez Jimenez: microbiological analysis and bacterial growth inhibition. Antonio Romero Silva: DFT calculations (Density of State and Molecular Orbital analyses). Navneet Kaur: Preparation of different organic nanoparticles and interpretation of characterization analyses. Pandiyan Thangarasu: The results and discussion (characterization, spectral data, and calculation details). Jorge Manuel Vazquez Ramos: The results and discussion of antibacterial studies and interpretation. Narinder Singh: Characterization of all nanoparticles through electronic microscopy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest

References

  1. Moritz, M.; Geszke-Moritz, M. The newest achievements in synthesis, immobilization and practical applications of antibacterial nanoparticles. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 228, 596–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Singh, M.; Singh, S.; Prasad, S.; Gambhir, I.S. Nanotechnology in medicine and antibacterial effect of silver nanoparticles. Dig. J. Nanomater. Biostructures 2008, 3, 115–122. [Google Scholar]
  3. Feng, Q.L.; Wu, J.; Chen, G.Q.; Cui, F.Z.; Kim, T.N.; Kim, J.O. A mechanistic study of the antibacterial effect of silver ions on escherichia coli and staphylococcus aureus. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2000, 52, 662–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lee, P.C.; Meisel, D. Adsorption and surface-enhanced Raman of dyes on silver and gold sols. J. Phys. Chem. 1982, 86, 3391–3395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lukman, A.I.; Gong, B.; Marjo, C.E.; Roessner, U.; Harris, A.T. Facile synthesis, stabilization, and anti-bacterial performance of discrete ag nanoparticles using medicago sativa seed exudates. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 353, 433–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Maillard, M.; Giorgio, S.; Pileni, M.P. Tuning the size of silver nanodisks with similar aspect ratios: Synthesis and optical properties. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 2466–2470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cui, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Tian, Y.; Zhang, W.; Lü, X.; Jiang, X. The molecular mechanism of action of bactericidal gold nanoparticles on escherichia coli. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 2327–2333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Arockiya Aarthi Rajathi, F.; Parthiban, C.; Ganesh Kumar, V.; Anantharaman, P. Biosynthesis of antibacterial gold nanoparticles using brown alga, stoechospermum marginatum (kützing). Spectrochim. Acta Part. A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2012, 99, 166–173. [Google Scholar]
  9. Muthuvel, A.; Adavallan, K.; Balamurugan, K.; Krishnakumar, N. Biosynthesis of gold nanoparticles using solanum nigrum leaf extract and screening their free radical scavenging and antibacterial properties. Biomed. Prev. Nutr. 2014, 4, 325–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Akhavan, O.; Ghaderi, E. Cu and cuo nanoparticles immobilized by silica thin films as antibacterial materials and photocatalysts. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2010, 205, 219–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Argueta-Figueroa, L.; Morales-Luckie, R.A.; Scougall-Vilchis, R.J.; Olea-Mejía, O.F. Synthesis, characterization and antibacterial activity of copper, nickel and bimetallic Cu-Ni nanoparticles for potential use in dental materials. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int. 2014, 24, 321–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Brayner, R.; Ferrari-Iliou, R.; Brivois, N.; Djediat, S.; Benedetti, M.F.; Fievet, F. Toxicological impact studies based on escherichia coli bacteria in ultrafine ZnO nanoparticles colloidal medium. Nano Lett. 2006, 6, 866–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Jaisai, M.; Baruah, S.; Dutta, J. Paper modified with ZnO nanorods—antimicrobial studies. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2012, 3, 684–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tam, K.H.; Djurisic, A.B.; Chan, C.M.N.; Xi, Y.Y.; Tse, C.W.; Leung, Y.H.; Chan, W.K.; Leung, F.C.C.; Au, D.W.T. Antibacterial activity of ZnO nanorods prepared by a hydrothermal method. Thin Solid Films 2008, 516, 6167–6174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ahmad, R.; Mohsin, M.; Ahmad, T.; Sardar, M. Alpha amylase assisted synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles: Structural characterization and application as antibacterial agents. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 283, 171–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Karunakaran, C.; Rajeswari, V.; Gomathisankar, P. Antibacterial and photocatalytic activities of sonochemically prepared ZnO and Ag-ZnO. J. Alloys Compd. 2010, 508, 587–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ghosh, S.; Goudar, V.S.; Padmalekha, K.G.; Bhat, S.V.; Indi, S.S.; Vasan, H.N. Zno/Ag nanohybrid: Synthesis, characterization, synergistic antibacterial activity and its mechanism. RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 930–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hassan, M.S.; Amna, T.; Sheikh, F.A.; Al-Deyab, S.S.; Choi, K.E.; Hwang, I.H.; Khil, M.-S. Bimetallic Zn/Ag doped polyurethane spider net composite nanofibers: A novel multipurpose electrospun mat. Ceram. Int. 2013, 39, 2503–2510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Valodkar, M.; Modi, S.; Pal, A.; Thakore, S. Synthesis and anti-bacterial activity of Cu, Ag and Cu-Ag alloy nanoparticles: A green approach. Mater. Res. Bull. 2011, 46, 384–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Banerjee, M.; Sharma, S.; Chattopadhyay, A.; Ghosh, S.S. Enhanced antibacterial activity of bimetallic gold-silver core-shell nanoparticles at low silver concentration. Nanoscale 2011, 3, 5120–5125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Sharma, N.; Kumar, J.; Thakur, S.; Sharma, S.; Shrivastava, V. Antibacterial study of silver doped zinc oxide nanoparticles against staphylococcus aureus and bacillus subtilis. Drug Inv. Today 2013, 5, 50–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cohen, D.; Soroka, Y.; Ma’or, Z.; Oron, M.; Portugal-Cohen, M.; Brégégère, F.M.; Berhanu, D.; Valsami-Jones, E.; Hai, N.; Milner, Y. Evaluation of topically applied copper(II) oxide nanoparticle cytotoxicity in human skin organ culture. Toxicol. In Vitro 2013, 27, 292–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Moschini, E.; Gualtieri, M.; Colombo, M.; Fascio, U.; Camatini, M.; Mantecca, P. The modality of cell–particle interactions drives the toxicity of nanosized CuO and TiO2 in human alveolar epithelial cells. Toxicol. Lett. 2013, 222, 102–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lei, M.; Liang, C.; Huan, Q.; Miyabayashi, K.; Miyake, M.; Yang, T. Morphology-controlled growth of Pt nanoparticles taking advantage of smaller molecule and inorganic salt. Acta Mater. 2014, 63, 202–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Goldman, E.R.; Medintz, I.L.; Whitley, J.L.; Hayhurst, A.; Clapp, A.R.; Uyeda, H.T.; Deschamps, J.R.; Lassman, M.E.; Mattoussi, H. A hybrid quantum dot-antibody fragment fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based TNT sensor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 6744–6751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Daniel, M.C.; Astruc, D. Gold nanoparticles: Assembly, supramolecular chemistry, quantum-size-related properties, and applications toward biology, catalysis, and nanotechnology. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 293–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Escobedo-Lozano, A.Y.; Domard, A.; Velázquez, C.A.; Goycoolea, F.M.; Argüelles-Monal, W.M. Physical properties and antibacterial activity of chitosan/acemannan mixed systems. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 115, 707–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kara, F.; Aksoy, E.A.; Yuksekdag, Z.; Hasirci, N.; Aksoy, S. Synthesis and surface modification of polyurethanes with chitosan for antibacterial properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 112, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Tayel, A.A.; Moussa, S.; Opwis, K.; Knittel, D.; Schollmeyer, E.; Nickisch-Hartfiel, A. Inhibition of microbial pathogens by fungal chitosan. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2010, 47, 10–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Uemura, T.; Kitagawa, S. Prussian blue nanoparticles protected by poly(vinylpyrrolidone). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 7814–7815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Fu, H.B.; Yao, J.N. Size effects on the optical properties of organic nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 1434–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ou, Z.-M.; Yao, H.; Kimura, K. Preparation and optical properties of organic nanoparticles of porphyrin without self-aggregation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2007, 189, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Navari-Izzo, F.; Quartacci, M.F.; Sgherri, C. Lipoic acid: A unique antioxidant in the detoxification of activated oxygen species. Plant. Physiol. Biochem. 2002, 40, 463–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Szelag, M.; Mikulski, D.; Molski, M. Quantum-chemical investigation of the structure and the antioxidant properties of alpha-lipoic acid and its metabolites. J. Mol. Model. 2012, 18, 2907–2916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Demir, U.; Demir, T.; Ilhan, N. The protective effect of alpha-lipoic acid against oxidative damage in rabbit conjunctiva and cornea exposed to ultraviolet radiation. Ophthalmologica 2005, 219, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Anand, N.; Ramudu, P.; Reddy, K.H.P.; Rao, K.S.R.; Jagadeesh, B.; Babu, V.S.P.; Burri, D.R. Gold nanoparticles immobilized on lipoic acid functionalized SBA-15: Synthesis, characterization and catalytic applications. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2013, 454, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ghanizadeh, A. Gold nanoparticles and lipoic acid as a novel anti-inflammatory treatment for autism, a hypothesis. J. Med. Hypotheses Ideas 2012, 6, 40–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Guler, E.; Barlas, F.B.; Yavuz, M.; Demir, B.; Gumus, Z.P.; Baspinar, Y.; Coskunol, H.; Timur, S. Bio-active nanoemulsions enriched with gold nanoparticle, marigold extracts and lipoic acid: In vitro investigations. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2014, 121, 299–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Henderson, L.C.; Altimari, J.M.; Dyson, G.; Servinis, L.; Niranjan, B.; Risbridger, G.P. A comparative assessment of α-lipoic acid N-phenylamides as non-steroidal androgen receptor antagonists both on and off gold nanoparticles. Bioorg. Chem. 2012, 40, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Leu, J.-G.; Chen, S.-A.; Chen, H.-M.; Wu, W.-M.; Hung, C.-F.; Yao, Y.-D.; Tu, C.-S.; Liang, Y.-J. The effects of gold nanoparticles in wound healing with antioxidant epigallocatechin gallate and α-lipoic acid. Nanomedicine: Nanomedicine Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2012, 8, 767–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Valodkar, M.; Rathore, P.S.; Jadeja, R.N.; Thounaojam, M.; Devkar, R.V.; Thakore, S. Cytotoxicity evaluation and antimicrobial studies of starch capped water soluble copper nanoparticles. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 201–202, 244–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kim, E.J.; Yeum, J.H.; Choi, J.H. Effects of polymeric stabilizers on the synthesis of gold nanoparticles. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2014, 30, 107–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Navarro, J.R.G.; Pluggae, M.; Loumaigne, M.; Sanchez-Gonzalez, A.; Menucci, B.; Débarre, A.; Brower, A.M.; Werts, M.H.V. Probing interaction between disulfide-based ligands and gold nanoparticles using functionalised fluorescent perylene-monoimide dye. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2010, 9, 1042–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Rafiee, A.; Alimohammadian, M.H.; Gazori, T.; Riazi-rad, F.; Fatemi, S.M.R.; Parizadeh, A.; Haririan, I.; Havaskary, M. Comparison of chitosan, alginate and chitosan/alginate nanoparticles with respect to their size, stability, toxicity and transfection. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Dis. 2014, 4, 372–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Horovitz, O.; Tomoaia-Cotişel, M.; Racz, C.; Tomoaia, G.; Bobos, L.-D.; Mocanu, A. The interaction of silver nanoparticles with lipoic acid. Stud. Univ. Babes-Bolyai Chem. 2009, 54, 89–96. [Google Scholar]
  46. Gedde, U. Polymer Physics; Chapman & Hall: London, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  47. De Almeida, C.G.; Garbois, G.D.; Amaral, L.M.; Diniz, C.C.; Le Hyaric, M. Relationship between structure and antibacterial activity of lipophilic N-acyldiamines. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2010, 64, 287–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Fernandes, P.; Ferreira, B.S.; Cabral, J.M.S. Solvent tolerance in bacteria: Role of efflux pumps and cross-resistance with antibiotics. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2003, 22, 211–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Lambert, P.A. Cellular impermeability and uptake of biocides and antibiotics in gram-positive bacteria and mycobacteria. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2002, 92, 46S–54S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Rai, M.K.; Deshmukh, S.D.; Ingle, A.P.; Gade, A.K. Silver nanoparticles: The powerful nanoweapon against multidrug-resistant bacteria. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2012, 112, 841–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Sondi, I.; Salopek-Sondi, B. Silver nanoparticles as antimicrobial agent: A case study on E. colias a model for Gram-negative bacteria. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004, 275, 177–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Klueh, U.; Wagner, V.; Kelly, S.; Johnson, A.; Bryers, J.D. Efficacy of silver-coated fabric to prevent bacterial colonization and subsequent device-based biofilm formation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2000, 53, 621–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Lok, C.N.; Ho, C.M.; Chen, R.; He, Q.Y.; Yu, W.Y.; Sun, H.Z.; Tam, P.K.H.; Chiu, J.F.; Che, C.M. Proteomic analysis of the mode of antibacterial action of silver nanoparticles. J. Proteome Res. 2006, 5, 916–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Pal, S.; Tak, Y.K.; Song, J.M. Does the antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles depend on the shape of the nanoparticle? A study of the gram-negative bacterium escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 1712–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Gogoi, S.K.; Gopinath, P.; Paul, A.; Ramesh, A.; Ghosh, S.S.; Chattopadhyay, A. Green fluorescent protein-expressing escherichia coli as a model system for investigating the antimicrobial activities of silver nanoparticles. Langmuir 2006, 22, 9322–9328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. He, D.; Dorantes-Aranda, J.J.; Waite, T.D. Silver nanoparticle-algae interactions: Oxidative dissolution, reactive oxygen species generation and synergistic toxic effects. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 8731–8738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Jones, A.M.; Garg, S.; He, D.; Pham, A.N.; Waite, T.D. Superoxide-mediated formation and charging of silver nanoparticles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 1428–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. He, D.; Jones, A.M.; Garg, S.; Pham, A.N.; Waite, T.D. Silver nanoparticle-reactive oxygen species interactions: Application of a charging−discharging model. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 5461–5468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lavi, R.; Shainberg, A.; Friedmann, H.; Shneyvays, V.; Rickover, O.; Eichler, M.; Kaplan, D.; Lubart, R. Low energy visible light induces reactive oxygen species generation and stimulates an increase of intracellular calcium concentration in cardiac cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 40917–40922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Lavi, R.; Shainberg, A.; Shneyvays, V.; Hochauser, E.; Isaac, A.; Zinman, T.; Friedmann, H.; Lubart, R. Detailed analysis of reactive oxygen species induced by visible light in various cell types. Lasers Surg. Med. 2010, 42, 473–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Ankri, R.; Friedman, H.; Savion, N.; Kotev-Emeth, S.; Breitbart, H.; Lubart, R. Visible light induces nitric oxide (NO) formation in sperm and endothelial cells. Lasers Surg. Med. 2010, 42, 348–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Gudkov, S.V.; Karp, O.E.; Garmash, S.A.; Ivanov, V.E.; Chernikov, A.V.; Manokhin, A.A.; Astashev, M.E.; Yaguzhinsky, L.S.; Bruskov, V.I. Generation of reactive oxygen species in water under exposure of visible or infrared irradiation at absorption band of molecular oxygen. Biofizika 2012, 57, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  63. Lubart, R.; Lavie, R.; Friedmann, H.; Sinyakov, M.; Shainberg, A.; Breitbart, H.; Grossman, N. UVA and visible light-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation in cell cultures: An electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) study. In Effects of Low-Power Light on Biological Systems V; Karu, T.L., Lubart, R., Eds.; SPIE: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2000; Volume 1, pp. 18–24. [Google Scholar]
  64. Park, H.-J.; Kim, J.Y.; Kim, J.; Lee, J.-H.; Hahn, J.-S.; Gu, M.B.; Yoon, J. Silver-ion-mediated reactive oxygen species generation affecting bactericidal activity. Water Res. 2009, 43, 1027–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Jose Ruben, M.; Jose Luis, E.; Alejandra, C.; Katherine, H.; Juan, B.K.; Jose Tapia, R.; Miguel Jose, Y. The bactericidal effect of silver nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 2005, 16, 2346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. He, D.; Garg, S.; Waite, T.D. H2O2-mediated oxidation of zero-valent silver and resultant interactions among silver nanoparticles, silver ions, and reactive oxygen species. Langmuir 2012, 28, 10266–10275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Shahverdi, A.R.; Fakhimi, A.; Shahverdi, H.R.; Minaian, S. Synthesis and effect of silver nanoparticles on the antibacterial activity of different antibiotics against staphylococcus aureus and escherichia coli. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2007, 3, 168–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Matsumura, Y.; Yoshikata, K.; Kunisaki, S.-I.; Tsuchido, T. Mode of bactericidal action of silver zeolite and its comparison with that of silver nitrate. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 4278–4281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Neal, A. What can be inferred from bacterium-nanoparticle interactions about the potential consequences of environmental exposure to nanoparticles? Ecotoxicology 2008, 17, 362–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Mylon, S.E.; Sun, Q.; Waite, T.D. Process optimization in use of zero valent iron nanoparticles for oxidative transformations. Chemosphere 2010, 81, 127–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Joo, S.H.; Feitz, A.J.; Sedlak, D.L.; Waite, T.D. Quantification of the oxidizing capacity of nanoparticulate zero-valent iron. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 1263–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Wu, B.; Huang, R.; Sahu, M.; Feng, X.Y.; Biswas, P.; Tang, Y.J. Bacterial responses to Cu-doped TiO2 nanoparticles. Sci. Total Environ. 2010, 408, 1755–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Bokare, A.; Sanap, A.; Pai, M.; Sabharwal, S.; Athawale, A.A. Antibacterial activities of Nd doped and Ag coated TiO2 nanoparticles under solar light irradiation. Colloid Surf. B-Biointerfaces 2013, 102, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Jayanthi, N.; Cruz, J.; Pandiyan, T. DFT studies on the phenol and thiophenol interaction on an undecagold cluster surface. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2008, 455, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Autschbach, J. Calculating electronical optical activity of coordination compounds. In Comprehensive Inorganic Chemistry II—From Elements to Applications, 2nd ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Waltham, MA, USA, 2013; Volume 9, pp. 407–426. [Google Scholar]
  76. Furche, F.; Rappoport, D. Density functional methods for excitated states: Equilibrium structure and electronic spectra. Theor. Comput. Chem. 2005, 16, 93–128. [Google Scholar]
  77. Choho, K.; Langenaeker, W.; VandeWoude, G.; Geerlings, P. Local softness and hardness as reactivity indices in the fullerenes C24–C76. J. Mol. Struct. THEOCHEM 1996, 362, 305–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Jalbout, A.F.; Darwish, A.M.; Alkahby, H.Y. Part II. Ionization energies, hardness, softness, and absolute electronegativity of heteronuclear and homonuclear diatomic molecules by the CBS-QB3 and G3B3 methods. J. Mol. Struct. THEOCHEM 2002, 585, 205–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Bhalla, V.; Gupta, A.; Kumar, M. Fluorescent nanoaggregates of pentacenequinone derivate for sensing of picric acid in aqueous media. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 3112–3115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Balows, A.; Hausler, W.J. Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 5th ed.; American Society for Microbiology: Washington, DC, USA, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  81. Coyle, M.B. Manual of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; American Society for Microbiology: Seattle, WA, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  82. Eloff, J.N. A sensitive and quick microplate method to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration of plant extracts for bacteria. Planta Med. 1998, 64, 711–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Marrie, T.J.; Costerton, J.W. Scanning and transmission electron-microscopy of insitu bacterial-colonization of intravenous and intraarterial catheters. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1984, 19, 687–693. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  • Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Aguilar, C.A.H.; Jiménez, A.B.P.; Silva, A.R.; Kaur, N.; Thangarasu, P.; Ramos, J.M.V.; Singh, N. Organic-Inorganic Hybrid Nanoparticles for Bacterial Inhibition: Synthesis and Characterization of Doped and Undoped ONPs with Ag/Au NPs. Molecules 2015, 20, 6002-6021. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules20046002

AMA Style

Aguilar CAH, Jiménez ABP, Silva AR, Kaur N, Thangarasu P, Ramos JMV, Singh N. Organic-Inorganic Hybrid Nanoparticles for Bacterial Inhibition: Synthesis and Characterization of Doped and Undoped ONPs with Ag/Au NPs. Molecules. 2015; 20(4):6002-6021. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules20046002

Chicago/Turabian Style

Aguilar, Carlos Alberto Huerta, Adriana Berenice Pérez Jiménez, Antonio Romero Silva, Navneet Kaur, Pandiyan Thangarasu, Jorge Manuel Vázquez Ramos, and Narinder Singh. 2015. "Organic-Inorganic Hybrid Nanoparticles for Bacterial Inhibition: Synthesis and Characterization of Doped and Undoped ONPs with Ag/Au NPs" Molecules 20, no. 4: 6002-6021. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules20046002

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop