Next Article in Journal
Synergistic Antibacterial Activity of the Essential Oil of Aguaribay (Schinus molle L.)
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis and Antiplasmodial Activity of Betulinic Acid and Ursolic Acid Analogues

Molecules 2012, 17(10), 12015-12022; doi:10.3390/molecules171012015

Article
Nukuhivensiums, Indolo[2,3-a]quinoliziniums from the Marquesan Plant Rauvolfia nukuhivensis
Nicolas J. Martin 1, Soizic Prado 2, Gael Lecellier 1, Olivier P. Thomas 3,* and Phila Raharivelomanana 1,*
1
EIMS Laboratory UMR 241 EIO, University of French Polynesia, 98702 Faa'a, Tahiti, French Polynesia; Email: Nicolas.martin@upf.pf (N.J.M.); Gael.lecellier@upf.pf (G.L.)
2
MCAM Laboratory UMR 7245 CNRS, National Museum of Natural History, 63 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France; Email: Sprado@mnhn.fr
3
Nice Institute of Chemistry UMR 7272 CNRS-PCRE, University of Nice-Sophia Antipolis, Parc Valrose, 06108 Nice, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed; Email: olivier.thomas@unice.fr (O.P.T.); phila.raharivelomanana@upf.pf (P.R.); Tel.: +33-04-9207-6134 (O.P.T.); Fax: +33-04-9207-6189 (O.P.T.); Tel.: +689-803-813 (P.R.); Fax: +689-803-804 (P.R.).
Received: 13 September 2012; in revised form: 7 October 2012 / Accepted: 9 October 2012 /
Published: 12 October 2012

Abstract

: The first phytochemical inspection of the Marquesan endemic plant Rauvolfia nukuhivensis led to the isolation and structure characterization of two new indolo[2,3‑a]quinolizinium derivatives named nukuhivensium (1) and N12-methyl-nukuhivensium (2). They feature an aromatic indolo[2,3-a]quinolizinium core, substituted at C-2 by a n-propyl group, which is unusual in this family of alkaloid derivatives. The structure elucidation was performed on the basis of NMR spectroscopy and especially by interpretation of 2D HMBC correlations. A biosynthetic pathway is proposed on the basis of known enzymatic transformations for this family of natural products. These compounds exhibited low antimicrobial activities.
Keywords:
alkaloid; Rauvolfia; antimicrobial; indoles; biosynthesis

1. Introduction

The highly extended geographic distribution of French Polynesia in the Pacific Ocean has resulted in a relatively high ratio of endemic species spread over the plethora of islands constitutive of this territory, whose distance from the continents may favor the “insular syndrome” leading to more speciation processes [1]. The Marquesas archipelago is one of the most isolated archipelagos of French Polynesia, which have a very original flora within a high endemicity [2,3]. Among them, the plant Rauvolfia nukuhivensis (Apocynaceae), locally called “tueiao”, is endemic of the Marquesas archipelago and more precisely of the small island of Nuku Hiva. Although this plant is still used in traditional medicine as a gynecological antiseptic [4], no phytochemical study has been reported so far. Over-exploited because of the frequent use of its bark (macerate) by local communities, the plant is now classified as a critically endangered species, and the description of its chemical constituents is urgently needed before its extinction [5]. Plants of the genus Rauvolfia are well known for their prolific biosynthesis of structurally diverse bioactive indole alkaloids, among them ajmaline and its plethora of structural analogues [6]. Nowadays, the biosynthetic genes of these biologically important alkaloids have been identified, which is an important step towards a commercial use of these compounds [7,8,9]. Some phytochemical work has been previously undertaken on Pacific species of the genus Rauvolfia. The Scheuer group identified serpentinine, ajmaline, sandwicine, sandwicencine, tetraphylline, tetraphyllicine and mauiensine from the Hawaiian spp. Rauvolfia sandwicensis and R. mauiensis [10,11]. Later, the Sevenet group identified ajmaline, but not reserpine, in some endemic species of the genus Rauvolfia from New Caledonia [12].

Within the framework of our continued interest in the phytochemical study of endemic and endangered species of French Polynesia, two original indolo[2,3-a]quinolizinium derivatives named nukuhivensium (1) and N12-methylnukuhivensium (2) were isolated from the Polynesian sp. Rauvolfia nukuhivensis (Figure 1). We report herein the isolation and structure elucidation of these new derivatives, as well as their antimicrobial activities.

Molecules 17 12015 g001 1024
Figure 1. Structures of natural indolo[2,3-a]quinoliziniums.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 1. Structures of natural indolo[2,3-a]quinoliziniums.
Molecules 17 12015 g001 1024

2. Results and Discussion

The stem bark of Rauvolfia nukuhivensis was extracted three times with ethanol and the crude extract was submitted to two subsequent fractionation processes, first by reversed phase and then by normal phase chromatography, to yield two main fractions containing alkaloids as revealed by TLC. Purification of one fraction by reversed phase HPLC led to the isolation of both compounds 1 and 2 in their pure form.

The molecular formula of 1 was determined as C18H17N2+ by HRESIMS. The 1H-NMR data (Table 1) suggested the presence of a polyaromatic system substituted by an n-propyl group corresponding to the signals at δH 1.12 (t, 3J = 7.5 Hz, H3-15), 1.94 (tq, 3J = 7.7 and 7.5 Hz, H2-14) and 3.06 (t, 3J = 7.7 Hz, H2-13) ppm which were clearly COSY correlated. Inspection of the chemical shifts of the resulting protons and carbons indicated that the rest of the molecule was polyaromatic. The presence of heterocyclic aromatic systems was deduced from the high deshielding of some resonating protons.

Table Table 1. 1H (500 MHz) and 13C (125 MHz) NMR data for compounds 1 and 2 in CD3OD.

Click here to display table

Table 1. 1H (500 MHz) and 13C (125 MHz) NMR data for compounds 1 and 2 in CD3OD.
Position12
δH, mult (J in Hz)δC, multHMBC (H→C)δH, mult (J in Hz)δC, mult
18.65, s120.5, CH13, 3, 6, 12a, 12b8.96, s121.5, CH
2 154.4, C 154.1, C
37.83, d (7.0)124.4, CH4, 1, 137.86, d (7.0)123.9, CH
49.19, d (7.0)137.6, CH3, 6, 2, 12b9.24, d (7.0)138.4, CH
68.84, d (7.0)128.1, CH7, 7a, 12b, 48.90, d (7.0)128.1, CH
78.61, d (7.0)117.2, CH7b, 6, 12a, 12b8.66, d (7.0)116.8, CH
7a 125.0, C 125.6, C
7b 122.5, C 128.9, C
88.36, d (8.0)123.3, CH11, 7b, 7a8.41, d (8.0)122.8, CH
97.50, dd (8.0; 7.0)122.9, CH11, 8, 10, 11a, 7b7.54, dd (8.0, 7.0)123.5, CH
107.74, dd (8.0; 7.0)131.0, CH8, 7b7.83, dd (8.0, 7.0)131.2, CH
117.84, d (8.0)113.6, CH9, 7b, 11a7.95, d (8.0)112.1, CH
11a 143.3, C 144.9, C
12 4.58, s34.6, CH3
12a 131.7, C 131.4, C
12b 134.3, C 135.2, C
133.06, t (7.7)38.6, CH214, 15, 2, 1, 33.09, t (7.7)38.7, CH2
141.94, tq (7.7; 7.5)23.9, CH215, 13, 21.93, tq (7.7, 7.5)24.4, CH2
151.12, t (7.5)14.0, CH314, 131.12, t (7.5)14.0, CH3

A careful inspection of the HMBC spectrum allowed us to unravel the chemical structure of 1. Indeed, the n-propyl was located on the para position of a pyridinium ring due to the key H2-13/C-2/C-1/C-3 HMBC correlations, the H2-13/H-1/H-3 4J correlations and the 3J COSY correlation between the signal at δH 7.83 (d, 3J = 7.0 Hz, H-3) and 9.19 (d, 3J = 7.0 Hz, H-4) ppm, this highly deshielded signal being inferred to the vicinity of the electron withdrawing effect of an ammonium group (Figure 2). The clear H-4/C-3/C-2/C-6/C-12b 2J and 3J HMBC correlations allowed the assignment of the entire pyridinium D ring as well as the C-6 methine. Starting from this C-6 methine, COSY coupled to the signal at δH 8.61 (d, 3J = 7.0 Hz, H-7), we were able to build the quinolizinium part of the molecule. Indeed the H-6/C-4/C-12b/C-7/C-7a HMBC correlations yielded the construction of the second pyridinium ring. The pattern of the resulting signals in the 1H-NMR and COSY spectra was reminiscent of an indole ring with δH 8.36 (d, 3J = 8.0 Hz, H-8), 7.50 (dd, 3J = 8.0 and 7.0 Hz, H-9), 7.74 (dd, 3J = 8.0 and 7.0 Hz, H-10) and 7.84 (d, 3J = 8.0 Hz, H-11) ppm. Finally, the indole ring was fused to the second pyridinium at C-12a/C-7a due to the key H-7/C-7b/C-12a/C-7a HMBC correlations. Additional H-8/C-7a/C-11a 3J HMBC correlations came to confirm the proposed structure of 1.

Molecules 17 12015 g002 1024
Figure 2. Key COSY (bold) and HMBC (H → C, arrow) correlations for 1.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 2. Key COSY (bold) and HMBC (H → C, arrow) correlations for 1.
Molecules 17 12015 g002 1024

The molecular formula of 2 was determined as C19H19N2+ by HRESIMS and suggested the presence of an additional methyl group comparing to 1. This methyl group was easily located at N12 due to the chemical shifts at δH 4.58 (s, H3-C) and δC 33.6 (C-H3) ppm (Table 1) which were reminiscent of an aromatic N-substituted methyl group. The deshielding of H-1 was clearly induced by the presence of this methyl at N12 and the H3-C/C-11a/C-12a HMBC correlations finally confirmed the substitution at N12. Compound 2 may be seen as an artifact during our extraction and purification process. Nevertheless, methylation with methanol is quite rare, especially under our mild extraction and purification conditions and the low nucleophilicity of the indole nitrogen.

From a structural point of view, these compounds share a rare indolo[2,3-a]quinolizinium core already found in flavopereirine [13,14] and sempervirine [15], for example (Figure 1). To our knowledge, the presence of an alkyl chain at C-2 was never reported on this aromatic core and this observation raised the question of the biosynthesis of these compounds. While for flavopereirine and sempervirine an oxidative process starting from saturated known analogues can be proposed, the presence of an n-propyl moiety at C-2 was very intriguing. Because there was no doubt on the structure of these compounds, we undertook a detailed analysis of known biochemical pathways leading to these new compounds. We suggest that a plausible hypothesis would start from the key and highly reactive intermediate “dialdehyde” derived from strictosidine (Scheme 1) [16]. In other Rauvolfia species, this dialdehyde has been proposed to yield the sarpagan and ajmalan alkaloids via 4,21-dehydro-geissoschizine, which involves an iso-propyl at C-2. Rather than an unlikely rearrangement of these three carbon atoms, we propose that nukuhivensiums could be formed like vallesiachotamine (Scheme 1). Indeed, after an alternative cyclization of “dialdehyde” two subsequent decarboxylative steps could afford the n-propyl at C-2 and finally compound 1 after additional oxidative steps. Work is ongoing to isolate minor alkaloids from this plant in order to strengthen our biosynthetic hypothesis.

Molecules 17 12015 g003 1024
Scheme 1. Biosynthetic hypothesis for 1.

Click here to enlarge figure

Scheme 1. Biosynthetic hypothesis for 1.
Molecules 17 12015 g003 1024

Because extracts of this plant are being used as a gynecological antiseptic, we first decided to assess the antimicrobial potential of these two new derivatives. Compounds 1 and 2 were evaluated in vitro for their antimicrobial activity against Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Candida albicans and Aspergillus niger. Both compounds exhibited low antimicrobial activities against S. aureus and C. albicans (Table 2). Two options can then be proposed: (i) other minor compounds are responsible of an antimicrobial activty related to the ethnopharmocological use of this plant; or (ii) the mode of action related to the gynecological use of this plant is not as antimicrobial agents.

Table Table 2. Antimicrobial activities of 1 and 2.

Click here to display table

Table 2. Antimicrobial activities of 1 and 2.
CompoundsMIC90 S. aureus (µg/mL)MIC90 E. coli (µg/mL)MIC90 C. albicans (µg/mL)MIC90 A. niger (µg/mL)
1105>150100>150
2115>150100>150
Tetracycline0.53NtNt
EconazoleNtNt2.602.20

Nt: Non tested.

3. Experimental

3.1. General

UV-Vis spectra were recorded by HPLC-DAD. NMR spectra were measured on a Bruker Avance 500 MHz spectrometer with pulsed field gradient and signals were referenced to the residual solvent signals (CD3OD, at δH 3.31 and δC 49.0 ppm). HRESIMS data were measured with a LTQ Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Finnigan). HPLC purification was carried out on a Waters 600 system equipped with a Waters 717 Plus autosampler, a Waters 998 photodiode array detector, and a Sedex 75 evaporative light-scattering detector (Sedere, France).

3.2. Plant Material

Rauvolfia nukuhivensis was collected at Maauu in the “Terre Déserte” area on Nuku Hiva Island, Marquesas archipelago, French Polynesia, at 477 m above sea level and identified by Dr Jean-François Butaud. A voucher specimen (JFB 2808) has been deposited in the Herbarium of French Polynesia.

3.3. Extraction and Isolation

The dried bark (250 g) was ground and extracted three times with 750 mL of EtOH at room temperature. The maceration was allowed to proceed for 16 h and then the solvent was filtered and concentrated by evaporation to yield a crude oil. The resulting extract (21 g) was dissolved by sonication in a mixture of 200 mL MeOH/CH2Cl2 (1:1) and then filtered before fractionation. This was carried out by vacuum liquid chromatography on RP-C18 and eluted with solvents of decreasing polarity A, B, C, D, E (H2O, H2O/MeOH (1:1), MeOH, MeOH/CH2Cl2 (1:1) and CH2Cl2, respectively). Fraction D, obtained with the MeOH/CH2Cl2 eluent, provided 2.82 g of an oily residue. A portion of fraction D (1.41 g) was further fractionated by normal phase (diol) flash column chromatography using solvents of stepwise increasing polarity: cyclohexane, cyclohexane/EtOAc (3:1), cyclohexane/EtOAc (1:1), cyclohexane/EtOAc (1:3), EtOAc, EtOAc/MeOH (3:1), EtOAc/MeOH (1:1), EtOAc/MeOH (1:3) and MeOH, yielding nine fractions D1 to D9. Purification of D7 (104 mg) was performed by RP-C18 semi-preparative HPLC (Phenomenex, Luna 5 µm C18, 250 mm × 10 mm) with a gradient of MeOH/H2O/TFA (from 70:30:0.1 to 30:70:0.1, flow 3 mL min−1) to afford pure compounds 1 (4.7 mg) and 2 (2.8 mg).

Nukuhivensium (1). UV measured by HPLC/DAD (MeOH/H2O/TFA) λmax 224, 241, 290, 340, 382 nm; 1H- and 13C-NMR see Table 1; HRESIMS m/z 261.13953 [M]+ (calcd for C18H17N2+, 261.13917).

N12-methylnukuhivensium (2). UV measured by HPLC/DAD (MeOH/H2O/TFA) λmax 225, 237, 248, 287, 335, 393 nm; 1H- and 13C-NMR see Table 1; HRESIMS m/z 275.15417 [M]+ (calcd for C19H19N2+, 275.15482).

3.4. Biological Evaluations

Reference strains of Escherichia coli (ATCC 8739) and Staphylococcus aureus subsp. aureus (ATCC 6538) were obtained from the Collection of the Institute Pasteur (Paris, France). Bacterial species were cultivated for 24 h in Luria Bertani medium (LB) at 37 °C. Candida albicans (IBMC Strasbourg) and Aspergillus niger (ATCC 9142) were cultivated at 30 °C for 48 h in Sabouraud dextrose medium (Sanofi Diagnostic Pasteur). Briefly, pre-cultures of the tested micro-organisms were made by inoculating 10 mL of LB and incubating for 24 h for bacteria or 10 mL in Sabouraud for 48 h for fungi. A culture suspension were made by 1/1,000 dilution from preculture and seeded in 96-well microtitration plates. Four microliters of two-fold serial dilutions of each compound (10 mg/mL) was prepared in 100 μL of medium. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for bacteria and at 30 °C for fungus. After 24 h, the optical density of the bacterial suspension of each well was measured at 595 nm using a multiplate reader. Tetracycline and econazole were used as positive controls.

4. Conclusions

Endemic plants of the Pacific Islands have been poorly studied phytochemically and several of them are now recognized as endangered species. Several species of the genus Rauvolfia are found on these islands and Rauvolfia nukuhivensis is currently used in traditional medicines by the local communities of the Marquesas islands (French Polynesia). Within a program aiming at protecting this species we decided to study the therapeutical potential of its chemodiversity. While ajmaline derivatives are frequently encountered, we were able to isolate two new indolo[2,3-a]quinolizinium derivatives closely related to sempervirine, but substituted at C-2 by an n-propyl alkyl chain. This finding raised the question of the biosynthesis of these two derivatives and we suggest another type of cyclisation of the well known corresponding dialdehyde. Because these compounds were found to exhibit a low antimicrobial activity, we will follow up the description of the metabolome of this species to further identify the bioactive constituents of this folk medicine.

Supporting Information

Supplementary materials can be accessed at: http://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/17/10/12015/s1.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a PhD grant to Nicolas Martin from the “Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche” of the French government. We are thankful to J. F. Butaud and to French Polynesia DIREN department for sample collection, plant material identification and helpful discussions. The authors wish to thank Jean-Marie Guigonis (Plate-Forme Bernard Rossi) for HRESIMS measurements and Marc Gaysinski (Plate-Forme Technologique de Chimie de Nice) for recording the NMR experiments.

  • Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds 12 are available from the authors.

References

  1. Guezenec, J.; Moretti, C.; Simon, J.C. Substances Naturelles en Polynésie française (in French); IRD Editions: Montpellier, France, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lorence, D.H.; Wagner, W.L. Introduction to botany of the marquesas islands: New taxa, combinations, and revisions. PhytoKeys 2011, 4, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Florence, J.; Chevillotte, H.; Ollier, C.; Meyer, J.Y. Base de données botaniques Nadeaud de l'herbier de Polynésie française (PAP) (in French). Available online: http://www.herbier-tahiti.pf/ (accessed on 10 October 2012).
  4. Suggs, R.C. Marquesan Sexual Behavior: An Anthropological study of Polynesian Practices; Harcourt, Brace: New York, NY, USA, 1966. [Google Scholar]
  5. Lorence, D.H.; Butaud, J.F. A reassessment of Marquesan Ochrosia and Rauvolfia (Apocynaceae) with two new combinations. PhytoKeys 2011, 4, 95–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lounasmaa, M.; Hanhinen, P. The ajmaline group of indole alkaloids. In The Alkaloids: Chemistry and Biology; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2001; Volume 55, pp. 1–87. [Google Scholar]
  7. Yang, L.; Stöckigt, J. Trends for diverse production strategies of plant medicinal alkaloids. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2010, 27, 1469–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Stöckigt, J.; Panjikar, S.; Ruppert, M.; Barleben, L.; Ma, X.; Loris, E.; Hill, M. The molecular architecture of major enzymes from ajmaline biosynthetic pathway. Phytochem. Rev. 2007, 6, 15–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Stöckigt, J. Biosynthesis in Rauwolfia serpentina. Modern aspects of an old medicinal plan. In The Alkaloids: Chemistry and Biology; Academic Press: SanDiego, CA, USA, 1995; Volume 47, pp. 115–172. [Google Scholar]
  10. Scheuer, P.J.; Chang, M.Y.; Fukami, H. Hawaiian plant studies. X. The structure of mauiensine. J. Org. Chem. 1963, 28, 2641–2643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gorman, M.; Neuss, N.; Djerassi, C.; Kutney, J.P.; Scheuer, P.J. Alkaloids. XIX. Alkaloids of Hawaiian Rauwolfia species. Structure of sandwicine and its interconversion with ajmaline and ajmalidine. Tetrahedron 1957, 1, 328–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Libot, F.; Miet, C.; Kunesch, N.; Poisson, J.E.; Pusset, J.; Sevenet, T. Plants of New Caledonia. Part 1020. Indole alkaloids from Rauvolfia species of New Caledonia. Ann. Pharm. Fr. 1986, 44, 477–485. [Google Scholar]
  13. Reina, M.; Ruiz-Mesia, W.; Lopez-Rodriguez, M.; Ruiz-Mesia, L.; Gonzalez-Coloma, A.; Martinez-Diaz, R. Indole alkaloids from Geissospermum reticulatum. J. Nat. Prod. 2012, 75, 928–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Steele, J.C.P.; Veitch, N.C.; Kite, G.C.; Simmonds, M.S.J.; Warhurst, D.C. Indole and β-Carboline Alkaloids from Geissospermum sericeum. J. Nat. Prod. 2002, 65, 85–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gribble, G.W.; Barden, T.C.; Johnson, D.A. A directed metalation route to the zwitterionic indole alkaloids. Synthesis of sempervirine. Tetrahedron 1988, 44, 3195–3202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. O’Connor, S.E.; Maresh, J.J. Chemistry and biology of monoterpene indole alkaloid biosynthesis. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2006, 23, 532–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules EISSN 1420-3049 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert