Next Article in Journal
Second Law Analysis of Adiabatic and Non-Adiabatic Pipeline Flows of Unstable and Surfactant-Stabilized Emulsions
Next Article in Special Issue
Reproducibility Probability Estimation and RP-Testing for Some Nonparametric Tests
Previous Article in Journal
Complexity Analysis of Surface EMG for Overcoming ECG Interference toward Proportional Myoelectric Control
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Entropy 2016, 18(4), 114; doi:10.3390/e18040114

Statistical Evidence Measured on a Properly Calibrated Scale for Multinomial Hypothesis Comparisons

1
Battelle Center for Mathematical Medicine, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, 575 Children’s Crossroad, Columbus, OH 43215, USA
2
Departments of Pediatrics and Statistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43215, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Julio Stern and Adriano Polpo
Received: 13 January 2016 / Revised: 22 March 2016 / Accepted: 23 March 2016 / Published: 30 March 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Statistical Significance and the Logic of Hypothesis Testing)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [3675 KB, uploaded 6 April 2016]   |  

Abstract

Measurement of the strength of statistical evidence is a primary objective of statistical analysis throughout the biological and social sciences. Various quantities have been proposed as definitions of statistical evidence, notably the likelihood ratio, the Bayes factor and the relative belief ratio. Each of these can be motivated by direct appeal to intuition. However, for an evidence measure to be reliably used for scientific purposes, it must be properly calibrated, so that one “degree” on the measurement scale always refers to the same amount of underlying evidence, and the calibration problem has not been resolved for these familiar evidential statistics. We have developed a methodology for addressing the calibration issue itself, and previously applied this methodology to derive a calibrated evidence measure E in application to a broad class of hypothesis contrasts in the setting of binomial (single-parameter) likelihoods. Here we substantially generalize previous results to include the m-dimensional multinomial (multiple-parameter) likelihood. In the process we further articulate our methodology for addressing the measurement calibration issue, and we show explicitly how the more familiar definitions of statistical evidence are patently not well behaved with respect to the underlying evidence. We also continue to see striking connections between the calculating equations for E and equations from thermodynamics as we move to more complicated forms of the likelihood. View Full-Text
Keywords: statistical evidence; information dynamics; entropy; thermodynamics; multinomial distribution statistical evidence; information dynamics; entropy; thermodynamics; multinomial distribution
Figures

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Vieland, V.J.; Seok, S.-C. Statistical Evidence Measured on a Properly Calibrated Scale for Multinomial Hypothesis Comparisons. Entropy 2016, 18, 114.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Entropy EISSN 1099-4300 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top