Next Article in Journal
Bell-Boole Inequality: Nonlocality or Probabilistic Incompatibility of Random Variables?
Next Article in Special Issue
Some Observations on the Concepts of Information-Theoretic Entropy and Randomness
Previous Article in Journal
An Algorithmic Complexity Interpretation of Lin's Third Law of Information Theory
Previous Article in Special Issue
Gibbs Paradox and the Concepts of Information, Symmetry, Similarity and Their Relationship
Entropy 2008, 10(1), 15-18; doi:10.3390/entropy-e10010015
Article

Gibbs’ Paradox and the Definition of Entropy

Physics Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
Received: 10 December 2007 / Accepted: 14 March 2008 / Published: 20 March 2008
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gibbs Paradox and Its Resolutions)
Download PDF [118 KB, uploaded 24 February 2015]

Abstract

Gibbs’ Paradox is shown to arise from an incorrect traditional definition of the entropy that has unfortunately become entrenched in physics textbooks. Among its flaws, the traditional definition predicts a violation of the second law of thermodynamics when applied to colloids. By adopting Boltzmann’s definition of the entropy, the violation of the second law is eliminated, the properties of colloids are correctly predicted, and Gibbs’ Paradox vanishes.
Keywords: Gibbs’ Paradox; entropy; extensivity; Boltzmann. Gibbs’ Paradox; entropy; extensivity; Boltzmann.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Share & Cite This Article

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Swendsen, R.H. Gibbs’ Paradox and the Definition of Entropy. Entropy 2008, 10, 15-18.

View more citation formats

Article Metrics

Comments

Citing Articles

[Return to top]
Entropy EISSN 1099-4300 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert