Next Article in Journal
A Novel Treatment Tool for PLA-Based Encapsulation Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Preparation and Characterisation of PBAT-Based Biocomposite Materials Reinforced by Protein Complex Microparticles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Antimony Extraction from Galena Concentrates †

by
Rafaella Aikaterini Megaloudi
1,*,
Apostolos Kourtis
1,
Paschalis Oustadakis
1,
Evangelos Tzamos
2,
Dimitrios Dimitriadis
3 and
Anthimos Xenidis
1
1
School of Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece
2
R & D Department, EcoResources PC, 54627 Thessaloniki, Greece
3
R & D Department, Hellas Gold S.A., 10674 Athens, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the International Conference on Raw Materials and Circular Economy, Athens, Greece, 5–9 September 2021.
Mater. Proc. 2021, 5(1), 130; https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2021005130
Published: 20 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of International Conference on Raw Materials and Circular Economy)

Abstract

:
The extraction of antimony and arsenic from galena concentrates by leaching with strongly alkaline sodium sulphide solution are investigated. The effects of leaching parameters including sodium sulphide and sodium hydroxide concentrations in the leaching solution, pulp density, reaction time and temperature on the extraction of antimony and arsenic are studied. It is indicated that high antimony extraction rates approaching 90–100% were obtained. However, arsenic extraction remained low at all experimental conditions considered, ranging between 2.5 and 4%, demonstrating that under these conditions, only certain arsenic-containing minerals are dissolved. The process presented is appropriate for antimony extraction with significant benefits associated with an increased value of galena concentrate and its own market value.

1. Introduction

Antimony is a metal with strategic importance and a wide range of applications. The research about antimony extraction is significant due to the fact that it is rarely found in nature alone, but mostly in association with other metals [1]. Antimony compounds are used in almost all modern industries and its future uses relate mainly to the developing technological field. It has been included in the EU critical raw materials list, considering its economic and strategic importance and high supply risk, given that worldwide, 75% of the total antimony is produced in China [2].
There are several antimony deposits in Greece; however, none are currently exploited. When beneficiating mixed sulphide ores, such as that of Kassandra (Olympias and Stratoni) mines, Chalkidiki, NE Greece, antimony is collected together with lead in galena concentrate. Although antimony is a critical element, it is considered as an impurity and, as in the case of arsenic, penalties are applied by customers when their total content in the concentrate exceeds certain values.
For the extraction of antimony in this study, leaching with strongly alkaline sodium sulphide solution is examined following a process similar to that applied at the former Sunshine Mine Company for the treatment of silver containing copper, antimony and sulphide concentrates [3]. Despite the significant differences of Olympias galena concentrate and the Sunshine Mine argentiferous copper concentrate, there were some chemical similarities rendering the application of the method still feasible for galena concentrates [4].
During sulphide leaching, sodium sulphide dissociates, resulting in the formation of S2−, HS and H2S(g) with their relative presence dependent on solution pH. Sulphide ions dominate when pH is greater than 10. The alkaline environment is necessary to prevent sulphide ion hydrolysis and the release of toxic H2S gas [5]. Antimony minerals existing in galena concentrates as either antimony sulphide (Sb2S3, stibnite) or mixed sulphides such as bulangerite (Pb5Sb4S11) are dissolved in alkaline sodium sulphide solutions to produce various thioanions such as thioantimonite (SbS33−) or thioantimonate (SbS43−), depending on reaction conditions. The main reaction describing bulangerite dissolution is:
Pb5Sb4S11(s) + 6Na2S(aq) → 5PbS(s) + 4Na3SbS3(aq)
When there are an insufficient number of sulphide ions in the solution, NaOH will dissolve antimony according to the equation.
Sb2S3(s) + 6NaOH → Na3SbS3(aq) + Na3SbO3(aq) + 3H2O

2. Materials and Methods

A representative sample of galena concentrate was obtained from Olympias Mine located in Chalkidiki (NE Greece). The grain size distribution was determined by the dry sieving of coarse fractions and laser particle analysis (Malvern microplus laser particle size analyser, Malvern Panalytical Ltd., Malvern, UK) of finer fractions. A subsample of 100 g was finely ground and subjected to chemical and mineralogical analyses. Chemical analysis was performed by digestion followed by analysis of the solution by atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS, PinAAcle 900T, PerkinElmer, Akron, OH, USA) and ICP-OES (Optima 7000, PerkinElmer, Akron, OH, USA), whereas the X-ray fluorescence technique (XRF, SPECTRO-XEPOS, SPECTRO, Kleve, Germany) was applied for the measurement of trace elements. Mineralogical analysis was performed by X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD, D8 Focus, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using a Jeol 6380LV (JEOL Ltd., Tendo-shi, Japan).
The galena concentrate was then subjected to alkaline sodium sulphide leaching, in order to extract antimony and arsenic. All experiments were conducted in a 500-mL five-necked, round-bottomed glass split reactor, which was fitted with a glass stirrer, a vapour condenser and a thermometer. In all of the experiments, a constant stirring speed was applied to ensure suspension of the particles. Heating was provided by a heating mantle and the temperature of the solution was controlled by a Pt-100 sensor. Leaching experiments were performed using sodium sulphide (100, 150 and 200 g/L) and sodium hydroxide (30 or 50 g/L) solution, at 5, 10 and 15% pulp density and temperatures of 90, 98 and 104 °C. Each run lasted 240 min and samples were taken at certain times as well as at the end of the experiment for chemical analysis of Sb and As. The solid residues were filtered under vacuum and analyzed with XRD. All leach solutions were analyzed by AAS and ICP-OES.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Sample Characterisation

Galena concentrate is a very fine material with d90 value equal to 190 μm, d10 = 2 μm and d50 = 41.9 μm. The results of chemical analysis are given in Table 1.
As seen in Table 1, the Olympias galena concentrate mainly consists of Pb (52.89%), S (17.39%), Sb (9.91%), Fe (4.47%), As (2.79%) and Zn (1.73%).
The main phases identified by XRD analysis are galena (PbS), boulangerite (Pb5Sb4S11), jamesonite (FePb4Sb6S14), sphalerite (ZnS) and quartz (SiO2) (Figure 1). Furthermore, SEM/microprobe analysis confirmed the presence of arsenopyrite (FeAsS), pyrite (FeS2), and burnonite (CuPbSbS3) (Figure 2).

3.2. Leaching

The results of Sb and As extraction at 4 h leaching time for all of the experiments performed are given in Table 2. The kinetics of Sb and As extraction from galena concentrate vs. Na2S concentration at 50 g/L NaOH concentration, a temperature 98 of °C and an S/L ratio of 0.1 kg/L are given in Figure 3a,b, respectively.
As seen in Table 1, the increase in Na2S concentration in the leaching solution and temperature results in the increase in Sb extraction. Meanwhile, an increase in the S/L ratio results in the decrease in Sb extraction. Maximum Sb extraction (99.09%) was accomplished at 250 g/L Na2S and 50 g/L NaOH concentrations in the leaching solution, a temperature of 98 °C and an S/L ratio of 0.1 kg/L. Under the experimental conditions applied, the kinetics of Sb dissolution are fast when the Na2S concentration is high, reaching values close to the respective maximum values at around 1 hour (Figure 3a). The Sb extraction kinetics at the lowest Na2S concentration investigated (100 g/L) is slower. Concerning As extraction, it is always very low, ranging from 2.15 to 4.05%. This is attributed to the presence of As in galena as arsenopyrite, which is practically insoluble in the alkaline sodium sulphide solutions used in the present study.
Solid leach residues have been further subjected to X-ray analysis with the respective patterns given in Figure 4 in comparison with the initial galena concentrate pattern. As seen in Figure 4, the peaks of boulangerite (Pb5Sb4S11) disappeared as the antimony was dissolved in almost all of the tests that have not been performed under the mildest extraction conditions (temperature of 90 °C and Na2S concentration of 100 g/L).

4. Conclusions

The extraction of antimony from Sb-bearing galena concentrates is of great importance in order to avoid the penalties applied in the market, as it is considered an impurity, and also due to its market value as it is a critical raw material. The Olympias galena concentrate sample used in this study contains 9.91% of Sb and 2.79% of As mainly in the form of boulangerite (Pb5Sb4S11) or jamesonite (FePb4Sb6S14) and arsenopyrite (FeAsS), respectively. The aim of this work was to find the optimal conditions to achieve maximum extraction of both Sb and As.
Based on the experimental results, it has been indicated that almost 100% antimony extraction can be achieved by leaching with sodium sulphide in alkaline conditions. Maximum Sb extraction (99.09%) is accomplished at 250 g/L Na2S and 50 g/L NaOH concentrations, a temperature of 98 °C and a S/L ratio of 0.1 kg/L. Arsenic extraction is always very low, ranging from 2.15 to 4.05%, which is attributed to the presence of As in galena in the form of arsenopyrite, which is practically insoluble in alkaline sodium sulphide solutions. XRD analysis of solid residues confirmed the absence of Sb-bearing phases.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.X. and D.D.; methodology, A.X. and A.K.; validation, A.K., R.A.M. and P.O.; experimentation, R.A.M., A.K., P.O. and E.T.; data curation, R.A.M.; writing—original draft preparation, R.A.M.; writing—review and editing, A.K. and A.X.; visualization, R.A.M.; supervision, A.X.; project administration, A.X.; funding acquisition, A.K. and A.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Hellas Gold S.A.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Hellas Gold SA for funding this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lide, D.R. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 87th ed.; Taylor & Francis: Abingdon-on-Thames, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, C.G. Antimony Production and Commodities. 2018. Available online: www.researchgate.net/profile/Corby-Anderson/publication/299133344_Antimony_Production_and_Commodites/links/5a7e1dcbaca272a73765cb27/Antimony-Production-and-Commodites.pdf (accessed on 5 March 2022).
  3. Anderson, C.G. The metallurgy of antimony. Geochemistry 2012, 72, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Anderson, C.G. Hydrometallurgy at the Sunshine Mine Metallurgical Complex. 1993. Available online: www.researchgate.net/publication/287997283_Hydrometallurgy_at_the_Sunshine_Mine_Metallurgical_Complex (accessed on 5 March 2022).
  5. Samuel, A.A. Antimony Recovery from Complex Copper Concentrates through Hydro- and Electrometallurgical Processes. 2013. Available online: www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A990544&dswid=5952 (accessed on 5 March 2022).
Figure 1. XRD pattern of galena concentrate.
Figure 1. XRD pattern of galena concentrate.
Materproc 05 00130 g001
Figure 2. SEM images of galena concentrate: (a) boulangerite (Spectrum 24); (b) arsenopyrite (Spectrum 1).
Figure 2. SEM images of galena concentrate: (a) boulangerite (Spectrum 24); (b) arsenopyrite (Spectrum 1).
Materproc 05 00130 g002
Figure 3. Extraction of (a) Sb and (b) As vs. time and Na2S concentration in the leaching solution (NaOH conc. 50 g/L, temperature 98 °C and S/L ratio 0.1 kg/L).
Figure 3. Extraction of (a) Sb and (b) As vs. time and Na2S concentration in the leaching solution (NaOH conc. 50 g/L, temperature 98 °C and S/L ratio 0.1 kg/L).
Materproc 05 00130 g003
Figure 4. XRD patterns of solid residues compared to the initial galena concentrate (1 galena, 2 bulangerite, 3 jamesonite, 4 sphalerite, 5 quartz).
Figure 4. XRD patterns of solid residues compared to the initial galena concentrate (1 galena, 2 bulangerite, 3 jamesonite, 4 sphalerite, 5 quartz).
Materproc 05 00130 g004
Table 1. Chemical analysis of the representative galena sample.
Table 1. Chemical analysis of the representative galena sample.
Element (% w/w)Digestion/AASXRF
Pb52.89
Zn1.73
Fe4.47
As2.79
S17.39
Sb9.91
Cu0.30
Mn 0.189
Ca 0.529
Al 0.068
Si 1.23
Table 2. Experimental conditions and Sb and As extraction (leaching time 4 h).
Table 2. Experimental conditions and Sb and As extraction (leaching time 4 h).
Exp. No.Na2S
(g/L)
NaOH
(g/L)
S/L
(kg/L)
T
(°C)
Sb Extraction
(%)
As Extraction
(%)
2100500.109888.803.43
1150500.109899.003.58
7250500.109899.093.19
8150500.109081.432.62
9150500.1010487.893.70
6150300.109898.393.20
4150500.059892.232.55
5150500.159872.794.05
3100500.109075.382.15
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Megaloudi, R.A.; Kourtis, A.; Oustadakis, P.; Tzamos, E.; Dimitriadis, D.; Xenidis, A. Antimony Extraction from Galena Concentrates. Mater. Proc. 2021, 5, 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2021005130

AMA Style

Megaloudi RA, Kourtis A, Oustadakis P, Tzamos E, Dimitriadis D, Xenidis A. Antimony Extraction from Galena Concentrates. Materials Proceedings. 2021; 5(1):130. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2021005130

Chicago/Turabian Style

Megaloudi, Rafaella Aikaterini, Apostolos Kourtis, Paschalis Oustadakis, Evangelos Tzamos, Dimitrios Dimitriadis, and Anthimos Xenidis. 2021. "Antimony Extraction from Galena Concentrates" Materials Proceedings 5, no. 1: 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2021005130

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop