Next Article in Journal
Transparency with Blockchain and Physical Tracking Technologies: Enabling Traceability in Raw Material Supply Chains
Previous Article in Journal
Microwave-Assisted Hydrothermal Synthesis of Zn2SnO4 Nanostructures for Photocatalytic Dye Degradation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Joint Forces of HR-Spicp-MS and EAF4-MALS for Characterization of Gold Nanorods Conjugated with Synthetic Glycopolymers †

1
Atomic & Mass Spectrometry—A&MS Research Group, Department of Chemistry, Ghent University, Campus Sterre, Krijgslaan 281-S12, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
2
Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium
3
Advanced Optical Microscopy Centre and Biomedical Research Institute, Hasselt University, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
4
Wyatt Technology Europe GmbH, Hochstrasse 12a, 56307 Dernbach, Germany
5
Department of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
6
Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 2nd International Online-Conference on Nanomaterials, 15–30 November 2020; Available online: https://iocn2020.sciforum.net/.
Mater. Proc. 2021, 4(1), 93; https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCN2020-07923
Published: 11 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 2nd International Online-Conference on Nanomaterials)

Abstract

:
As the diversity of nanomaterials is wide and their size can vary by 2 orders of magnitude (1−100 nm), the development of new and advanced analytical tools for their in-depth characterization is of paramount importance, allowing a fundamental understanding of their structure, further alteration and degree of chemical surface functionalization. Herein, we present a new strategy for characterization of gold nanorods (GNRs) that are of specific interest for biomedical applications due to their unique size-dependent longitudinal surface plasmon resonance band in the visible to near-infrared spectral region. More precisely, we characterized GNRs conjugated with short and long synthetic glycopolymers for biosensing of lectins in terms of particle size, coating thickness, and/or mobility properties in comparison with the bare GNRs. This endeavor requires a multidisciplinary approach including a new comprehensive set of fit-for-purpose analytical tools being high-resolution single-particle inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (HR-spICP-MS) and electrical asymmetric-flow field-flow-fractionation hyphenated to a multi-angle light scattering detector (EAF4-MALS). GNRs were separated and characterized via EAF4-MALS in terms of their size and charge, while HR-spICP-MS provided information on the particle number density, size, size distribution, and the dimensional characterization. In addition, EAF4-MALS appears to be suitable for estimating coating thickness of glycoconjugated GNRs.

1. Introduction

Nanomaterials have attracted considerable attention because of their unique physical, chemical, and mechanical properties, exhibiting distinct size-dependent properties in the 1–100 nm range. Intensive research is being done related to the use of nanomaterials in many contexts such as energy storage, energy conversion, solar cells, pharmaceuticals, life science applications, optoelectronics, sensing and actuation nanosystems, catalysis, and composite materials [1]. Since the potential of nanoscale particles (NPs) has been identified, scientific and commercial interest has increased tremendously. It is expected that in the next decade, a countless number of increasingly complex, versatile, and useful nanomaterials will be designed, synthesized, and applied in different research areas. However, these advanced applications of nanomaterials require their customization in terms of chemical composition/functionalization, size, and morphology. Careful and safe design of NPs and precise control during the synthesis process to ensure a successful application is crucial [2]. As a result, development of different analytical tools to follow-up the nanomaterial synthesis from an early stage onwards on the one hand and to fully characterize the finally synthesized NPs on the other is required.
Gold nanorods (GNRs) have been found promising in biomedical applications, mainly because of their unique optical properties dominated by the localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) phenomenon: their anisotropic shape causes a splitting of their optical absorption bands into two peaks corresponding to the transverse and longitudinal plasmon resonances. The longitudinal resonance peak position is highly shape- and size dependent, and it is shifted from the visible to the near-infrared (NIR) region with increasing aspect ratio (length/width) [3,4]. GNRs are promising in cancer diagnostics [5] and treatment [6,7,8,9,10,11], gene therapy and drug deliver applications [12,13], as well as for in vitro diagnostics of a wide variety of disease-specific biomarker targets [14,15,16].
The utilization of GNRs for biomedical applications requires an appropriate functionalization to provide chemical stability and biocompatibility, and to recognize target molecules in a biological environment. However, the synthesis and characterization of GNRs with well-defined sizes, shapes, and bioconjugated surfaces remains an important challenge.
A unique aspect of this specific research is the development of a set of analytical tools (methods) for physicochemical characterization of gold nanorods (GNRs) conjugated with short and long synthetic glycopolymers for biosensing of lectins in terms of particle size, coating thickness, and/or mobility properties in comparison with the bare GNRs. The developmental process of glycoconjugated GNRs requires a multidisciplinary analytical approach including a new comprehensive set of fit-for-purpose tools, such as high-resolution single-particle inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (HR-spICP-MS) and electrical asymmetric-flow field-flow-fractionation hyphenated to a multi-angle light scattering detector (EAF4-MALS).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Glycopolymer Conjugated Gold Nanorods

Citrate-stabilized GNRs of 10 nm width and 38 nm length were purchased from Nanopartz (Loveland CO US/Canada). Monomer N-hydroxyethyl acrylamide (97%, HEA), 2-(dodecylthiocarbonothioylthio)-2-methylpropionic acid pentafluorophenyl ester (98%, PFP-DMP), and D-(+)-galactosamine were all purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Poly(N-hydroxyethyl acrylamide) (PHEA) was synthetized by photo-initiated reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization in two lengths of 35 and 60 degree of polymerizations, corresponding to different degrees of polymerization; then they were functionalized with D-(+)-galactosamine (Gal) achieving the glycopolymers Gal-PHEA35 and Gal-PHEA60, as previously described [17].
Citrate-GNRs were functionalized with 4 mg of each glycopolymer dissolved in 200 µL of water and mixed by pipetting with 800 µL of GNRs suspension at 10 OD. After 1 h incubation at room temperature in the dark, the particles were sonicated for 1 min using an ultrasonic bath at 40 kHz (Branson 1800 series CPX1800H), centrifuged at 12,000 RCF and 20 °C for 15 min using a Sigma 3-30KS centrifuge, and the supernatant removed. This was followed by 3 cycles of re-suspension in 1 mL water, centrifugation and decanting. The particles were finally resuspended in 1 mL water and stored in polypropylene graduated tubes at 4 °C until use.

2.2. HR-Spicp-MS

All samples were analyzed with a Nu Attom ICP-MS (Nu Instruments Ltd., Wrexham, UK). This instrument is equipped with a double-focusing sector field mass spectrometer, with forward (Nier-Johnson) geometry. In single particle mode, a single m/z value was monitored (i.e., the magnetic field and all voltages were fixed). For the measurement of GNRs the instrument was operated at low resolution (R ~ 300). Samples were introduced using a conventional sample introduction system, consisting of a glass concentric nebulizer mounted onto a quartz cyclonic spray chamber with a nominal uptake rate of 300 μL min−1 (self-aspirating). HR-spICP-MS was used in time-resolved analysis (TRA) measurement mode, with dwell times of 40 µs and a total acquisition time of 60 s (Figure 1, Table 1).
Data acquisition and data treatment were performed using the combination of NuAttoLab and NuQuant sofware (Nu Instruments, Ltd., Wrexham, UK). Finally, GNRs dimensional characterization method was adopted from Kalomista et al., 2017 [18].

2.3. EAF4-MALS

EAF4 measurements were performed using an Eclipse AF4 system with Mobility module (Wyatt Technology, Santa Barbara, CA, USA) using a 25 cm Mobility electric long channel equipped with a 350 μm spacer and a 5 kDa cutoff polyether sulfone membrane. Detection was accomplished with a DAWN 18-angle MALS detector (Wyatt Technology, Santa Barbara, CA, USA). 0.5 mM sodium nitrate was used as the carrier solution. For separation, the cross-flow was maintained at 0.5 mL/min for 30 min. For Mobility measurements an amperage of −0.1 mA (bottom electrode positively charged) was applied during separation. Data were collected and analyzed using VISION software (Wyatt Technology, Santa Barbara, CA, USA). Effective channel height calibration was performed using 20 nm spherical gold nanoparticles (BAM-N004, Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und prüfung, Berlin, Germany).

3. Results

3.1. HR-spICP-MS for Glycoconjugated GNRs Characterization

High temporal resolution extends the capabilities of the spICP-MS technique as previously reported by Kalomista et al. [18]. As expected, the average of 5% for shortest and longest transit times were correlated with the length of 32 nm and the width of 11 nm of GNRs, respectively. This is in accordance with the certificates provided for GNRs (10 nm width and 38 nm length). As such HR-spICP-MS allowed fast dimensional characterization of GNRs and could be used as an orthogonal method to investigate different batches of the GNRs after synthesis and their further use in conjugation with short and long synthetic glycopolymers.
The spherical equivalent diameter and particle size distribution data for bare GNRs and glycoconjugated GNRs (Figure 2, Table 2) was derived in order to provide the thickness of the glycopolymers binded on the GNRs surface. When interpreting mean particle size and particle size distribution data result as provided by HR-spICP-MS, it must be acknowledged that the particle size was not significantly altered after binding synthetic glycopolymers on the GNRs surface, meaning that both short and long glycopolymers did not impact the particle size measurements. This is an important factor as the localized surface plasmon resonance signal generated by GNRs is shape- and size-dependent [5,6]. However, HR-sp-ICP-MS is not able to provide information on the thickness of the glycopolymers bound to the GNR surface as it is based on single particle detection via the 197Au ion signal. Therefore, the EAF4-MALS method was further applied.

3.2. EAF4-MALS for Glycoconjugated GNRs Characterization

The size of GNRs was assessed using EAF4-MALS runs without an amperage applied during separation (Figure 3).
The retention time could then be directly related to the sample hydrodynamic size. We observed an increased retention time of glycoconjugated GNRs compared to the bare GNRs (Figure 3) indicating an increase in hydrodynamic size which was highest for the longest glycopolymers. In addition, HR-spICP-MS results have shown that there was no significant difference in spherical equivalent diameter of the bare GNRs and glycoconjugated GNRs. Therefore, the increase in hydrodynamic diameter can be attributed to the glycoconjugation of GNRs. This confirmed successful coating of GNRs. The increase in size (Table 3) can be used to estimate the coating thickness of glycoconjugated GNRs. The charge of GNRs is assessed by comparing EAF4-MALS runs with (−0.1 mA) and without (0.0 mA) an amperage applied during separation. Shifts towards a higher retention time of up to 0.5 min are observed for each sample when applying −0.1 mA. This indicates a negative charge of GNRs before and after glycoconjugation.

4. Conclusions

The current study achieved its main goals concerning the characterization of the GNRs conjugated with short and long synthetic glycopolymers. The GNRs were separated and characterized via EAF4-MALS regarding size and surface charge, while HR-spICP-MS provided information on the particle number density, size, size distribution, and anisotropic dimensions. In addition, EAF4-MALS appeared to be suitable for estimating the coating thickness of glycoconjugated GNRs. Finally, further research is needed to prove the significant advantage offered by joining the capabilities of HR-spICP-MS and EAF4-MALS (e.g., reproducibility) for the characterization of gold nanorods conjugated with synthetic glycopolymers when compared to more common characterization methods, such as UV-VIS and DLS.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.V., A.P., K.T. and I.N.; methodology, R.M., C.J., M.V, A.P., P.G.G.; software, Not applicable; validation, M.V, A.P., R.M., P.G.G..; formal analysis, M.V; A.P., R.M., P.G.G..; investigation, X.X.; resources, F.V, I.N., K.T., M.I.G., C.J.; data curation, Not applicable; writing—original draft preparation, M.V., A.P., R.M.; writing—review and editing, all.; visualization, M.V; A.P., R.M., P.G.; supervision, F.V, I.N., K.T., M.I.G., C.J..; project administration, M.V; A.P., R.M., P.G.G..; funding acquisition, F.V., K.T., I.N., M.I.G.. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable

Acknowledgments

Milica Velimirovic is a senior postdoctoral researcher of the Research Foundation—Flanders (FWO project number 12ZD120N). Alessia Pancaro, Panagiotis G. Georgiou, Inge Nelissen and Matthew I. Gibson thank the European Union’s H2020-MSCA-ITN programme under Grant Agreement N° 814236 (NanoCarb).

References

  1. Curtis, A.S.G.; Wilkinson, C. Nantotechniques and approaches in biotechnology. Trends Biotech. 2001, 19, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mülhopt, S.; Diabaté, S.; Dilger, M.; Adelhelm, C.; Anderlohr, C.; Bergfeldt, T.; de la Torre, J.G.; Jiang, Y.; Valsami-Jones, E.; Langevin, D.; et al. Characterization of Nanoparticle Batch-To-Batch Variability. Nanomaterials 2013, 8, 311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Smith, M.; Mancini, M.C.; Nie, S.M. Bioimaging second window for in vivo imaging. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2009, 4, 710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhu, K.; Yong, T.; Roy, I.; Hu, R.; Ding, H.; Zhao, L.L.; Swihart, M.T.; He, G.S.; Cui, Y.P.; Prasad, P.N. Additive controlled synthesis of gold nanorods (GNRs) for two-photon luminescence imaging of cancer cells. Nanotechnology 2010, 21, 285106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Li, J.L.; Gu, M. Surface plasmonic gold nanorods for enhanced two-photon microscopic imaging and apoptosis induction of cancer cells. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 9492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Dickerson, E.B.; Dreaden, E.C.; Huang, X.H.; El-Sayed, I.H.; Chu, H.H.; Pushpanketh, S.; McDonald, J.F.; El-Sayed, M.A. Gold nanorod assisted near-infrared plasmonic photothermal therapy (PPTT) of squamous cell carcinoma in mice. Cancer Lett. 2008, 269, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. XHuang, H.; El-Sayed, I.H.; Qian, W.; El-Sayed, M.A. Cancer cell imaging and photothermal therapy in the near-infrared region by using gold nanorods. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2115. [Google Scholar]
  8. Okuno, T.; Kato, S.; Hatakeyama, Y.; Okajima, J.; Maruyama, S.; Sakamoto, M.; Mori, S.; Kodama, T. Photothermal therapy of tumors in lymph nodes using gold nanorods and near-infrared laser light. J. Control. Release 2013, 172, 879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kuo, W.S.; Chang, C.N.; Chang, Y.T.; Yang, M.H.; Chien, Y.H.; Chen, S.J.; Yeh, C.S. Gold nanorods in photodynamic therapy, as hyperthermia agents, and in near-infrared optical imaging. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 2711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Li, L.; Chen, J.Y.; Wu, X.; Wang, P.N.; Peng, Q.A. Plasmonic gold nanorods can carry sulfonated aluminum phthalocyanine to improve photodynamic detection and therapy of cancers. J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114, 17194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Chen, C.C.; Lin, Y.P.; Wang, C.W.; Tzeng, H.C.; Wu, C.H.; Chen, Y.C.; Chen, C.P.; Chen, L.C.; Wu, Y.C. DNA-gold nanorod conjugates for remote control of localized gene expression by near infrared irradiation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 3709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Huang, H.C.; Barua, S.; Kay, D.B.; Rege, K. Simultaneous enhancement of photothermal stability and gene delivery efficacy of gold nanorods using polyelectrolytes. ACS Nano 2009, 3, 2941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Nusz, G.J.; Curry, A.C.; Marinakos, S.M.; Wax, A.; Chilkoti, A. Rational selection of gold nanorod geometry for label-free plasmonic biosensors. ACS Nano. 2009, 3, 795–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Guo, Y.J.; Sun, G.M.; Zhang, L.; Tang, Y.J.; Luo, J.J.; Yang, P.H. Multifunctional optical probe based on gold nanorods for detection and identification of cancer cells. Sens. Actuator B Chem. 2014, 191, 741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Truong, P.L.; Cao, C.; Park, S.; Kim, M.; Sim, S.J. A new method for non-labeling attomolar detection of diseases based on an individual gold nanorod immunosensor. Lab Chip. 2011, 11, 2591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Georgiou, P.G.; Baker, A.N.; Richards, S.J.; Laezza, A.; Walker, M.; Gibson, M. Tuning aggregative versus non-Aggregative lectin binding with glycosylated nanoparticles by the nature of the polymer ligand. J. Mater. Chem. B 2019, 8, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kálomista, I.; Kéri, A.; Ungor, D.; Csapó, E.; Dékány, I.; Prohaska, T.; Galbács, G. Dimensional characterization of gold nanorods by combining millisecond and microsecond temporal resolution single particle ICP-MS measurements. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2017, 32, 2455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Johann, C. WP2606: Exosome Characterization with FFF-MALS-DLS.; Wyatt: Dernbach, Germany, 2018. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. High-resolution single-particle inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (HR-spICP-MS) and electrical asymmetric-flow field-flow-fractionation hyphenated to a multi-angle light scattering detector (EAF4-MALS) set up.
Figure 1. High-resolution single-particle inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (HR-spICP-MS) and electrical asymmetric-flow field-flow-fractionation hyphenated to a multi-angle light scattering detector (EAF4-MALS) set up.
Materproc 04 00093 g001
Figure 2. Particle size distribution of (a) bare gold nanorods (GNRs); (b) GNR-Gal-PHEA35; and (c) GNR-Gal-PHEA60.
Figure 2. Particle size distribution of (a) bare gold nanorods (GNRs); (b) GNR-Gal-PHEA35; and (c) GNR-Gal-PHEA60.
Materproc 04 00093 g002
Figure 3. 90° light scattering fractograms of GNRs, GNR-Gal-PHEA35 and GNR-Gal-PHEA60.
Figure 3. 90° light scattering fractograms of GNRs, GNR-Gal-PHEA35 and GNR-Gal-PHEA60.
Materproc 04 00093 g003
Table 1. ICP-MS instrumental settings and conditions.
Table 1. ICP-MS instrumental settings and conditions.
Parameter
RF power1300 W
Plasma gas flow rate13 L min−1
Carrier gas flow rate0.93 L min−1
Measurement modeTRA
Nuclide monitored197Au
Dwell time40 µs
Acquisition time60 s
NebulizerMicroMist
Spray chamberCyclonic
Table 2. HR-spICP-MS results of bare GNRs and glycoconjugated GNRs.
Table 2. HR-spICP-MS results of bare GNRs and glycoconjugated GNRs.
GNRsGNR-Gal-PHEA35GNR-Gal-PHEA60
Spherical equivalent diameter (nm)21.0 ± 0.521.0 ± 0.422.0 ± 0.0
Table 3. Hydrodynamic diameter Dh determined via EAF4-MALS.
Table 3. Hydrodynamic diameter Dh determined via EAF4-MALS.
GNRsGNR-Gal-PHEA35GNR-Gal-PHEA60
Dh (nm)17.021.322.1
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Velimirovic, M.; Pancaro, A.; Mildner, R.; Georgiou, P.G.; Tirez, K.; Nelissen, I.; Johann, C.; Gibson, M.I.; Vanhaecke, F. Joint Forces of HR-Spicp-MS and EAF4-MALS for Characterization of Gold Nanorods Conjugated with Synthetic Glycopolymers. Mater. Proc. 2021, 4, 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCN2020-07923

AMA Style

Velimirovic M, Pancaro A, Mildner R, Georgiou PG, Tirez K, Nelissen I, Johann C, Gibson MI, Vanhaecke F. Joint Forces of HR-Spicp-MS and EAF4-MALS for Characterization of Gold Nanorods Conjugated with Synthetic Glycopolymers. Materials Proceedings. 2021; 4(1):93. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCN2020-07923

Chicago/Turabian Style

Velimirovic, Milica, Alessia Pancaro, Robert Mildner, Panagiotis G. Georgiou, Kristof Tirez, Inge Nelissen, Christoph Johann, Matthew I. Gibson, and Frank Vanhaecke. 2021. "Joint Forces of HR-Spicp-MS and EAF4-MALS for Characterization of Gold Nanorods Conjugated with Synthetic Glycopolymers" Materials Proceedings 4, no. 1: 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCN2020-07923

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop