Next Article in Journal
The Aconitum carmichaelii F3′5′H Gene Overexpression Increases Flavonoid Accumulation in Transgenic Tobacco Plants
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Analysis of the Quality of Domestically Distributed Cut Phalaenopsis Flowers Based on the Season and Place of Origin
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optimum Castor Meal Application in the Cultivation of Pak Choi (Brassica chinensis L.) with Toxicity Survey for Earthworms (Eisenia andrei)

Department of Plant Industry, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung 912301, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2021, 7(10), 383; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7100383
Submission received: 11 September 2021 / Revised: 26 September 2021 / Accepted: 28 September 2021 / Published: 9 October 2021

Abstract

:
In Taiwan, castor meal (CM) is often used by farmers as an organic fertilizer for the supplement of plant nutrition. It can rapidly increase nitrogen availability for crops. However, the excessive application of CM will affect the ecosystem. This study was conducted to evaluate the optimum concentration of CM that can be used as a fertilizer for balancing crop production and soil ecosystem health (by considering earthworms). Pak choi was selected for the experiment. A randomized block design with three replications was used, with treatments consisting of five concentrations of CM (namely 25, 50, 100, 150, and 200 kg/0.1 ha) and fermented livestock compost 800 kg/0.1 ha, represented as CM25, CM50, CM100, CM150, CM200, and LC800, respectively. The results revealed that soil properties, leaf nutrient concentration, and plant traits, namely plant diameter, plant height, and fresh and dry root and shoot matter, improved with the increasing concentrations of CM, and CM100–CM200, and led to the highest production of pak choi which was equivalent to that with LC800. However, the weight of earthworms decreased as CM concentrations increased. The weight of earthworms was similar between CM25, CM50, CM100, and LC800. In conclusion, given the characteristics of high nitrogen as a fertilizer, the optimal dose of CM was 100–150 kg/0.1 ha for obtaining a balance between crop production and ecosystem safety.

1. Introduction

Organic residues are widely used as fertilizers because they provide nutrition to plants, improve the physical and chemical properties of soil [1], and promote microbial activity in soil [2,3,4].
One of the crucial byproducts of organic fertilizer use is the potentially available N [5], which is the most essential nutrient for plant growth [6]. In the soil, N is mainly present in organic form; however, plants can only absorb inorganic N, such as nitrate or ammonia [7,8]. Organic matter (OM) must be mineralized with a suitable carbon to nitrogen (C/N) ratio. When organic residues are added to soil, N and P content temporarily decline through immobilization by microorganisms [9]. Thereafter, N is gradually released from the residue [10]. The C/N ratio is a crucial factor affecting the decomposition rate of organic material [11]. For using any matter as compost, its C/N ratio should ideally be in the range of 25–30 [12]. Because the C/N ratio of plant meal is <20, it can be considered a rapidly available organic fertilizer [13].
Castor (Ricinus communis L.) is widely cultivated in India, China, and Brazil [14]. Castor oil contains abundant ricinoleic fatty acid, which is useful for industrial application; thus, it differs from other oils [15,16]. Castor meal (CM) is produced from the residue left after the extraction of oil from castor seeds. CM is toxic to animals because it contains a toxic protein ricin; however, it is not toxic to plants when used as an organic fertilizer, which is the most common use of this byproduct [17]. CM is often imported and sold as fertilizer to farmers in Taiwan because its N content is approximately 7–8% [18], which is higher than that of many organic fertilizers [19]. However, the high ricinine content in CM was found to cause toxicity in plants and the ecosystem if used in high doses. Following CM application to soil, a temporary toxic effect is occasionally observed for some days because of rapid mineralization, leading to the release of excessive N in the soil; however, the toxicity eases after 1–2 weeks [17,20]. Some studies have revealed that doses >4% (v:v) reduce seedling emergence, impair plant growth, and even cause plant death [21,22]. Moreover, CM contains high concentrations of ricinine, which poisons earthworms in soil if excessively applied [23]. Hence, use of an appropriate CM dose can promote remarkable plant growth.
This study examined the optimum CM dose for improving the growth of pak choi while minimizing its harmful effects on the ecosystem (e.g., earthworms).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Design and Treatments

The experiments were conducted using pots in replicates of four at the Department of Plant Industry, National Pingtung University, Pingtung, Taiwan, between September and December 2020 by using a completely randomized design. Each experimental pot (diameter 31.5 cm and depth 22 cm) was composed of five pak choi plants growing in a blend of sandy loam soil with various organic fertilizers mixed according to the experimental design. The temperatures of the daytime and nighttime were 25 and 18 °C, respectively. The soil temperature and soil moisture were 20–25 °C and 55–60% for the growth of earthworms. In each pot, 55 ± 5 g (10 individuals) of earthworms was introduced. The earthworms were obtained from Tai-Ping No. 2 (Eisenia andrei). Five concentrations of organic fertilizers were employed with 800 kg/0.1 ha application of livestock compost (LC), namely CM 25, 50, 100, 150, and 200 kg/0.1 ha (CM25, CM50, CM100, CM150, and CM200, respectively). The amounts of organic fertilizers to be used in pots were calculated on the basis of pot area and weight of the topsoil. The CM contained OM (90.0%), N (5%), phosphorus oxide (P2O5; 2.1%), and potassium oxide (K2O; 1.5%). The LC contained 61% OM, 2.5% N, 2.3% P2O5, and 2.0% K2O.

2.2. Soil and Plant Analysis

A composite soil sample (0−30 cm) was collected before cultivation. The physiochemical characteristics of the studied soil and plant samples were assessed. Soil texture was determined using the hydrometer method according to Beretta et al. (2014). Soil OM was measured using the Walkley and Black dichromate oxidation method [24]. Soil salinity was measured through the salt bridge method by using an electrical conductance (EC) meter [25], and the soil pH was determined using a pH meter [26]. A mixture of ammonium fluoride (1 N) and hydrochloric acid (0.5 N) was used for P extraction from soil samples, and ammonium acetate (1 M adjusted at pH 7.0) was used for K extraction. P was measured through the molybdenum blue method by using a spectrophotometer (Hitachi U-2000, Japan) at 650 mm [27]. K was measured using a flame photometer (Corning 410, England) [28]. The available nutrients were measured after soil samples were digested according to the procedure by El-Ramady et al. (2014) [29]. The metals in soil and plant extracts were determined using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (Jobin Yvon, Ultima 2000). A composite soil sample (0−30 cm) was collected from each experimental unit for studying available nutrients and physiochemical characteristics. The ground leaf samples were digested using concentrated sulfuric acid. Subsequently, the digested extracts were analyzed for N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Cu, and Zn with standard methods used in soil analysis.

2.3. Determination of Pak Choi Traits

Ten plant samples from each experimental unit were sampled randomly to determine their traits. Plant samples were washed with tap water followed by distilled water and then converted to a mixture by using a blender. The total soluble solid values were measured using a digital refractometer according to the method by Ali et al. (2018) [30]. The plant height, leaf number, leaf width, root length, wet weight, and dry weight were estimated. The leaf area was calculated using Image J software.

2.4. Estimation of Earthworm Weight

After the plant traits were investigated, the soil in the pots was poured out, and earthworms were carefully collected and weighed. The weight of earthworms in each pot was recorded after removing the soil on their surface.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The obtained results were statistically analyzed with one-way analysis of variance and Duncan test (at 0.05% probability), for which SAS 9.1.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was employed.

3. Results

The soil properties before the experiment were as follows: pH = 5.14, EC = 53.5 μS/cm, OM = 3.5%, P2O5 = 23.0 kg/ha, and K2O = 43.6 kg/ha (Table 1). After treatments with organic fertilizers, the pH of all soils increased. Among the different treatments, LC application led to the highest increment in soil pH. However, the CM application exhibited the opposite trend, with the application of 200 kg/0.1 ha showing the lowest pH increment. Conversely, because LC leads to higher salinity and slower nutrient release compared with CM [31], the increase in pH was the highest with LC800. Soil EC increased with CM concentration. The OM (organic matter) of soil was highest with the LC800 (4.4%), and it increased following CM application. Among the treatments of CM, it was the highest with CM150 and CM200 (4.3%). The P contents of soil were similar across all the CM200 and LC800 treatments, and they were significantly higher than CM25. The K contents of soil increased following CM treatment, and the highest level was observed with LC800. The K contents in the treatments of LC800 were significantly higher than CM. N concentration in plants increased with CM concentrations (Table 2). N in plants with CM200 treatment was significantly higher than that with CM25 treatment. However, N with CM25 treatment was higher than that with LC800 treatment by 8.3%. Both P and K concentrations in plants were highest with CM200 than other treatments. The plant height and leaf number were not significantly different between all treatments. The leaf area, leaf width, fresh weight and sugar degree of pak choi were all highest with the LC800. However, the leaf area, leaf width, fresh weight, dry weight, and sugar degree of pak choi increased progressively with the increased application of CM. Although the traits of pak choi were optimal with the LC800 treatment, they were not significantly different from those with the CM200 treatment (Table 3). Comparison of pak choi traits with various soil samples is presented in Figure 1.
The investigation of earthworms in soil samples revealed that the weight of earthworms in soils decreased with all treatments compared with that before the treatment. No significant difference was observed between treatment with 25, 50, and 100 kg/ha CM; however, treatment with 150 and 200 kg/0.1 ha CM revealed significant difference compared with the aforementioned three treatments (Figure 2).

4. Discussion

Appropriate application of organic fertilizers may improve soil physicochemical properties, consequently increasing root growth and the uptake of essential nutrients [32]. Organic fertilizer application can improve soil moisture in diverse terrains [33]. In the current study, the pH and EC of soil increased after the application of organic fertilizers because OM has higher cation exchangeable capacity and can adsorb hydrogen ions in soil solution; however, the rapid release of large amounts of minerals causes temporary soil acidification [34]. Conversely, because LC leads to high salinity and slow nutrient release [31], the pH increment was the highest with LC800 treatment (near CM200). Moreover, leaf area, leaf width, leaf weight, root length, and sugar degree of pak choi increased with the application dose of CM. The highest concentration of CM (200 kg/0.1 ha) significantly enhanced the traits of pak choi in comparison with the lowest CM concentration (25 kg/0.1 ha). Although LC800 application exhibited the greatest improvement in all plant traits, the main traits, including plant height, plant weight, dry weight, and sugar degree, were not significantly different from those with CM100, CM150, CM200, and LC800 application (Figure 1). Abe, Songmuang, and Harada (1995) [35] studied the response of rice plants to various CM concentrations and reported that 200 kg/0.1 ha CM improved the growth and quality of rice in comparison with the nonamended soil. Gupta, Antil, and Narwal (2004) [36] indicated that CM of approximately 100–150 kg/0.1 ha should be applied at least three weeks before sowing of wheat and the field must be kept moist for the degradation of toxicants. Approximately 100 kg/0.1 ha castor cake increases the production of marketable fruits (1.78 kg per plant) compared with controls [37]. The current study clearly demonstrated that CM concentrations of 100, 150, and 200 kg/0.1 ha significantly increased the fresh weight, dry weight, root length, and sugar degree by 31%, 34%, 30%, and 50%, respectively, in comparison with 25 kg/0.1 ha. Moreira et al. (2014) [38] assessed the effect of CM concentration on pak choi plants grown in a greenhouse, and they found that 100–150 kg/0.1 ha CM increased the diameter of lettuce head and leaf numbers by 5.5 and 19.6%, respectively. Hilioti et al. (2017) reported that CM as an organic fertilizer can enhance soil fertility and increase the nutrient uptake in crops [39]. The results of the present field trials illustrated that fortifying the soil with CM200 increased soil EC, OM, P, and K by 56%, 9%, 20%, and 23%, respectively, compared with CM25; furthermore, this CM concentration significantly enhanced the uptake of N, P, and K by 27%, 28%, and 15%, respectively, compared with CM25. Increasing the OM in soil improves the nutrient availability and enhances the physiochemical properties of the soil [40,41]. In the current study, fortification of the soil with CM (CM200) increased the soil EC and OM by 32.9% and 19.4%, respectively, compared with before the experiment, and by 56% and 10%, respectively, compared with CM25 (Table 3 and Figure 1). The leaf nutrient concentration increased with CM concentration (Table 2). CM200 increased the N, P, and K concentration by approximately 27%, 28%, and 29%, respectively. These findings are similar to those of relevant studies indicating higher N, P, and K uptake by wheat and solanaceous plants after CM application [36,42].
CM contains ricin residue, and, hence, CM application to the soil introduces ricin in the soil. Ricin toxin was confirmed to be harmful to animal cells [43]. Stillmark observed that ricin causes agglutination of red blood cells and promotes protein precipitation in serum. The molecule is formed by two chains (A and B) bonded by a single disulfide bond [44]. Chain A is a ribosome-inactivating enzyme of 32 kDa, whereas chain B is a galactose/N-acetylgalactosamine-binding lectin of 34 kDa [45]. Both chains are required for the high toxicity of ricin and inhibition of protein assimilation in cells. In the current result, the traits of pak choi were better or similar with the application of CM100 to CM200 kg/0.1 ha. However, CM application of <150 kg/0.1 ha was most effective at ensuring the survival of earthworms. Therefore, the optimal dose of CM for obtaining a balance between crop production and the reduction of toxicity to earthworms based on primary evaluation was 100–150 kg/0.1 ha.

5. Conclusions

Not only crop productivity but also ecosystem safety should be considered. Castor meal (CM) is a fertilizer of high nitrogen and is often applied by farmers for the supplement of plant nutrition. However, the effect of CM on the ecosystem (e.g., survival of the earthworm) has rarely been considered. This study primarily evaluated the optimum concentration of CM required to balance crop productivity with ecosystem safety. The optimal dose of CM was determined to be 100–150 kg/0.1 ha for obtaining a balance between crop production and the reduction of toxicity to earthworms.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.-H.L.; methodology, Y.-H.L.; software, J.-M.W.; validation, Y.-H.L., Z.-S.L. and J.-M.W.; formal analysis, J.-M.W.; investigation, Z.-S.L.; resources, Y.-H.L.; data curation, J.-M.W.; writing—original draft preparation, J.-M.W.; writing—review and editing, Y.-H.L.; visualization, Z.-S.L.; supervision, Y.-H.L.; project administration, Z.-S.L.; funding acquisition, Y.-H.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Agriculture and Food Agency, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, ROC.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The analysis of inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy was assisted by Kaohsiung District Agricultural Research and Extension Station, Pingtung, Taiwan. All authors reviewed the final manuscript. This research was funded by Agriculture and Food Agency, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, ROC.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hafez, M.; Popova, A.I.; Rashad, M. Integrated use of bio-organic fertilizers for enhancing soil fertility–plant nutrition, germination status and initial growth of corn (Zea mays L.). Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 21, 101329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wu, H.S.; Yang, X.N.; Fan, J.Q.; Miao, W.G.; Ling, N.; Xu, Y.C.; Huang, Q.W.; Shen, Q.R. Suppression of Fusarium wilt of watermelon by a bio-organic fertilizer containing combinations of antagonistic microorganisms. BioControl 2009, 54, 287–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Xiao, X.P.; Mazza, L.; Yu, Y.Q.; Cai, M.M.; Zheng, L.Y.; Tomberlin, J.K.; Yu, J.; Huise, A.; Yu, Z.N.; Fasulo, S.; et al. Efficient co-conversion process of chicken manure into protein feed and organic fertilizer by Hermetia illucens L. (Diptera: Stratiomyidae) larvae and functional bacteria. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 217, 668–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, Q.; Meng, X.H.; Li, T.; Raza, W.; Liu, D.Y.; Shen, Q.R. The Growth Promotion of Peppers (Capsicum annuum L.) by Trichoderma guizhouense NJAU4742-Based Biological Organic Fertilizer: Possible Role of Increasing Nutrient Availabilities. Microorganisms. 2020, 8, 1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Surin, P. Release of Various Elements from Organic Fertilizers Incubated in Organic and Non-organic Paddy Soils at Various Time Periods. Curr. App. Sci. Tech. 2019, 19, 276–288. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhang, X.; Davidson, E.A.; Mauzerall, D.L.; Searchinger, T.D.; Dumas, P.; Shen, Y. Managing nitrogen for sustainable development. Nature 2015, 528, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Raven, J.A.; Wollenweber, B.; Handley, L. A comparison of ammonium and nitrate as nitrogen sources for photolithotrophs. New Phytol. 1992, 121, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hachiya, T.; Sakakibara, H. Interactions between nitrate and ammonium in their uptake, allocation, assimilation, and signaling in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 2501–2512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Christie, P.; Wasson, E.A. Short-term immobilization of ammonium and nitrate added to a grassland soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2001, 33, 1277–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, J.F.; Zhong, F.F. Nitrogen release and re-adsorption dynamics on crop straw residue during straw decomposition in an Alfisol. J. Integr. Agric. 2021, 20, 248–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Priya, V.; Lokesh, M.; Kesavan, D.; Komathi, G.; Naveena, S. Evaluating the Perfect Carbon: Nitrogen (C:N) Ratio for Decomposing. Inter. Res. J. Engin. Tech. 2017, 4, 1144–1147. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kumar, M.; Ou, Y.L.; Lin, J.G. Co-composting of green waste and food waste at low C/N ratio. Waste Manag. 2010, 30, 602–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sudharmaidevi, C.R.; Thampatti, K.C.M.; Saifudeen, N. Rapid production of organic fertilizer from degradable waste by thermochemical processing. Int. J. Recycl. Org. Waste Agric. 2017, 6, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Miller, R.O.; Kissel, D.E. Comparison of Soil pH Methods on Soils of North America. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2010, 74, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Anjani, K. A re-evaluation of castor (Ricinus communis L.) as a crop plant. Perspect. Agric. Vet. Sci. Nutr. Nat. Res. 2014, 9, 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ying, S.; Hill, A.T.; Pyc, M.; Anderson, E.M.; Snedden, W.A.; Mullen, R.T.; She, Y.M.; Plaxton, W.C. Regulatory phosphorylation of bacterial-type PEP carboxylase by the Ca2+-dependent protein kinase RcCDPK1 in developing castor oil seeds. Plant Physiol. 2017, 174, 1012–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Lima, R.; Severino, L.S.; Sampaio, L.R.; Sofiatti, V.; Gomes, J.A.; Beltrão, N.E.M. Blends of castor meal and castor husks for optimized use as organic fertilizer. Indust. Crops Prod. 2011, 33, 364–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Matos, J.B., Jr.; Dias, A.N.; Bueno, C.F.D.; Rodrigues, P.A.; Veloso, Á.L.C.; Filho, D.E.D.F. Metabolizable energy and nutrient digestibility of detoxified castor meal and castor cake for poultry. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2011, 40, 2439–2442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Severino, L.S.; Lima, R.L.S.; Beltrão, N.E.M. Composição Química de Onze Materiais Orgânicos Utilizados em Substratos para Produção de Mudas; Embrapa Algodão: Campina Grande, Brazil, 2006; p. 5. [Google Scholar]
  20. McKeon, T.A.; Shim, K.B.; He, X.H. Reducing the toxicity of castor seed meal through processing treatments. Biocatal. Agric. Biotech. 2013, 2, 159–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Akande, T.O.; Odunsi, A.A.; Adedeji, O.S. Toxicity and Nutritive assessment of castor (Ricinus cummunis) oil and processed cake in rat diet. Asian J. Anim. Sci. 2011, 5, 330–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Roberto, A.C.R.; José, L.M.N.; Guido, A.P.T. Evaluation of seed yield and oil contents in four materials of Ricinus communis L. Agron. Colomb. 2011, 29, 43–48. [Google Scholar]
  23. Scoriza, R.N.; Bianchi, M.D.O.; Correia, M.E.F.; Leal, M.A.A. Effect of castor cake and elephant grass composting on edaphic fauna. Ciência Rural 2016, 46, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Meersmans, J.; Wesemael, B.V.; Molle, M.V. Determining soil organic carbon for agricultural soils: A comparison between the Walkley & Black and the dry combustion methods (north Belgium). Soil Use Manag. 2009, 25, 346–353. [Google Scholar]
  25. Corwin, D.L. Soil Salinity Measurement. In Encyclopedia of Water Science; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 2003; pp. 852–857. [Google Scholar]
  26. Miller, F.P.; Vandome, A.F.; McBrewster, J. Castor Oil; Alphascript Publishing: Beau Bassin, Mauritius, 2009; Volume 63. [Google Scholar]
  27. Wei, L.L.; Chen, C.R.; Xu, Z.H. The effect of low-molecular-weight organic acids and inorganic phosphorus concentration on the determination of soil phosphorus by the molybdenum blue reaction. Biotech. Fertil. Soil 2009, 45, 775–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Banerjee, P.; Prasad, B. Determination of concentration of total sodium and potassium in surface and ground water using a flame photometer. Appl. Water Sci. 2020, 10, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. El-Ramady, H.R.; Alshaal, T.A.; Amer, M.; Domokos-Szabolcsy, É.; Elhawat, N.; Prokisch, J.; Fári, M. Soil Quality and Plant Nutrition. Sustain. Agric. Rev. 2014, 14, 345–446. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ali, M.M.; Janius, R.B.; Nawi, N.M.; Hashim, N. Prediction of total soluble solids and pH in banana using near infrared. J. Eng. Sci. Tech. 2018, 13, 254–264. [Google Scholar]
  31. Dikinya, O.; Mufwanzala, N. Chicken manure-enhanced soil fertility and productivity: Effects of application rates. J. Soil Sci. Environ. Manag. 2010, 1, 46–54. [Google Scholar]
  32. Roussos, P.A.; Gasparatos, D.; Kechrologou, K.; Katsenos, P.; Bouchagier, P. Impact of organic fertilization on soil properties, plant physiology andyield in two newly planted olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivars under Mediterranean conditions. Sci. Hortic. 2017, 220, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Vengadaramana, A.; Jashothan, P.T.J. Effect of organic fertilizers on the water holding capacity of soil in different terrains of Jaffna peninsula in Sri Lanka. J. Nat. Prod. Plant Resour. 2012, 2, 500–503. [Google Scholar]
  34. Kiran, B.R.; Prasad, M.N.V. Ricinus communis L. (Castor bean), a potential multi-purpose environmental crop for improved and integrated phytoremediation. EuroBiotech J. 2017, 1, 101–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Abe, J.; Songmuang, P.; Harada, J. Root Growth of Paddy Rice with Application of Organic Materials as Fertilizers in Thailand. Jpn. Agric. Res. Q. 1995, 29, 77–82. [Google Scholar]
  36. Gupta, A.P.; Antil, R.S.; Narwal, R.P. Utilization of deoiled castor cake for crop production. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2004, 50, 389–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gomes, D.P.; de Carvalho, D.F.; Pinto, M.F.; Valença, D.D.C.; Medici, L.O. Growth and production of tomato fertilized with ash and castor cake and under varying water depths, cultivated in organic potponics. Acta Sci. Agron. 2017, 39, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Moreira, M.A.; dos Santos, C.A.P.; Lucas, A.A.T.; Bianchini, F.G.; de Souza, I.M.; Viégas, P.R.A. Lettuce production according to different sources of organic matter and soil cover. Agric. Sci. 2014, 5, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Hilioti, Z.; Michailof, C.M.; Valasiadis, D.; Iliopoulou, E.F.; Koidou, V.; Lappas, A.A. Characterization of castor plant-derived biochars and their effects as soil amendments on seedlings. Biomass Bioenergy 2017, 105, 96–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shepherd, M.A.; Harrison, R.; Webb, J. Managing soil organic matter—Implications for soil structure on organic farms. Soil Use Manag. 2002, 18, 284–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Aziz, T.; Ullah, S.; Sattar, A.; Nasim, M.; Farooq, M.; Khan, M.M. Nutrient Availability and Maize (Zea mays) Growth in Soil Amended with Organic Manures. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2010, 12, 621–624. [Google Scholar]
  42. Roy, M.; Karmakar, S.; Debsarcar, A.; Sen, P.K.; Mukherjee, J. Application of rural slaughterhouse waste as an organic fertilizer for pot cultivation of solanaceous vegetables in India. Int. J. Recycl. Org. Waste Agric. 2013, 2, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Sandvig, K.; van Deurs, B. Transport of protein toxins into cells: Pathways used by ricin, cholera toxin and Shiga toxin. FEBS Lett. 2002, 529, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Olsnes, S.; Pihl, A. Different Biological Properties of the Two Constituent Peptide Chains of Ricin A Toxic Protein Inhibiting Protein Synthesis. Biochemistry 1973, 12, 3121–3126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Lord, J.M.; Roberts, L.M.; Robertus, J.D. Ricin: Structure, Mode of Action, and Some Current Applications. FASEB J. 1994, 8, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The growth of Pak Choi (Brassica chinensis L.) by the treatments of organic fertilizers. (A) LC800, (B) CM25, (C) CM50, (D) CM100, (E) CM150, (F) CM200. CM25, CM50, CM100, CM150 and CM200 represent the rate of castor meal 25, 50, 100, 150 and 200 kg/0.1 ha. LC800 represented the application of livestock compost 800 kg/0.1 ha.
Figure 1. The growth of Pak Choi (Brassica chinensis L.) by the treatments of organic fertilizers. (A) LC800, (B) CM25, (C) CM50, (D) CM100, (E) CM150, (F) CM200. CM25, CM50, CM100, CM150 and CM200 represent the rate of castor meal 25, 50, 100, 150 and 200 kg/0.1 ha. LC800 represented the application of livestock compost 800 kg/0.1 ha.
Horticulturae 07 00383 g001
Figure 2. The earthworms variation after the harvesting of Pak Choi (Brassica chinensis L.) in soil by the treatments of organic fertilizers. (CM25, CM50, CM100, CM150 and CM200 represented the rate of castor meal 25, 50, 100, 150 and 200 kg/0.1 ha. LC800 represented the application of livestock compost 800 kg/0.1 ha). The same letters (a, b) in the graphic represent no significant difference with 0.05 level according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 2. The earthworms variation after the harvesting of Pak Choi (Brassica chinensis L.) in soil by the treatments of organic fertilizers. (CM25, CM50, CM100, CM150 and CM200 represented the rate of castor meal 25, 50, 100, 150 and 200 kg/0.1 ha. LC800 represented the application of livestock compost 800 kg/0.1 ha). The same letters (a, b) in the graphic represent no significant difference with 0.05 level according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Horticulturae 07 00383 g002
Table 1. The soil properties before and after treatments of different rate of organic fertilizer.
Table 1. The soil properties before and after treatments of different rate of organic fertilizer.
TreatmentspH3 EC (μS/cm)4 OM
(%)
P2O5
(kg/ha)
K2O
(kg/ha)
Before experiment5.14 b 553.5 ab3.5 c23.0 a43.6 bc
1 CM255.61 a35.3 bc3.9 bc18.5 b27.1 c
CM505.54 a26.8 c3.8 bc23.4 a27.3 c
CM1005.53 a33.1 bc4.0 bc20.2 ab29.4 c
CM1505.45 a42.3 b4.3 a21.8 ab29.9 c
CM2005.43 a79.7 a4.3 a23.0 a35.1 bc
2 LC8005.65 a42.9 b4.4 a23.4 a71.8 a
1 CM25, CM50, CM100, CM150, CM200: The application rate of castor meal 25, 50, 100, 150 and 200 kg/0.1 ha. 2 LC800: the compost in accordance with national standard 800 kg/0.1 ha. 3 EC: Electrical conductance. 4 OM: Organic matter. 5 The same letter in the same column of means no significant difference with 0.05 level according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Table 2. The nutrient concentrations in the leaves of Pak Choi after the application of organic fertilizers.
Table 2. The nutrient concentrations in the leaves of Pak Choi after the application of organic fertilizers.
TreatmentsN (%)P (%)K (%)
1 CM253.00 bc 30.239 c3.40 c
CM503.01 bc0.264 bc3.67 bc
CM1003.17 bc0.280 bc3.69 bc
CM1504.02 a0.281 bc3.98 a
CM2004.13 a0.334 a4.01 a
2 LC8002.75 c0.299 a4.39 a
1 CM25, CM50, CM100, CM150 and CM200 represented the rate of castor meal 25, 50, 100, 150 and 200 kg/0.1 ha. 2 LC800 represented the application of livestock compost 800 kg/0.1 ha. 3 The same letter in the same column of means no significant difference with 0.05 level according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Table 3. The traits of Pak Choi by the treatments of organic fertilizers.
Table 3. The traits of Pak Choi by the treatments of organic fertilizers.
Fertilizers Rate (kg)Plant Height (cm)Leaves Number
(No.)
Leaf Area (cm2)Leaf Width (cm)Fresh Weight (g)Dry Weight (g)Root Length (cm)Sugar
Degree
(°Bx)
1 CM2524.2 a 312 a82.6 c5.3 c18.8 c1.30 c12.5 c1.4 c
CM5022.2 a12 a90.2 c6.6 b20.3 b1.52 b12.6 c1.9 b
CM10025.3 a12 a105.4 b6.6 b23.7 ab1.76 ab15.9 b2.5 a
CM15025.1 a11 a120.9 b7.5 ab24.1 a1.85 a16.7 b2.5 a
CM20020.4 a10 a169.6 a7.8 a27.1 a1.98 a18.0 a2.8 a
2 LC80022.7 a10 a231.4 a8.3 a28.2 a1.85 a21.4 a3.0 a
1 CM25, CM50, CM100, CM150 and CM200 represented the rate of castor meal 25, 50, 100, 150 and 200 kg/0.1 ha. 2 LC800 represented the application of livestock compost 800 kg/0.1 ha. 3 The same letter in the same column of means no significant difference with 0.05 level according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Z.-S.; Wu, J.-M.; Lin, Y.-H. Optimum Castor Meal Application in the Cultivation of Pak Choi (Brassica chinensis L.) with Toxicity Survey for Earthworms (Eisenia andrei). Horticulturae 2021, 7, 383. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7100383

AMA Style

Liu Z-S, Wu J-M, Lin Y-H. Optimum Castor Meal Application in the Cultivation of Pak Choi (Brassica chinensis L.) with Toxicity Survey for Earthworms (Eisenia andrei). Horticulturae. 2021; 7(10):383. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7100383

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Zheng-Shang, Jia-Mei Wu, and Yong-Hong Lin. 2021. "Optimum Castor Meal Application in the Cultivation of Pak Choi (Brassica chinensis L.) with Toxicity Survey for Earthworms (Eisenia andrei)" Horticulturae 7, no. 10: 383. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7100383

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop