Runoff for Russia (RFR v1.0): The Large-Sample Dataset of Simulated Runoff and Its Characteristics
Abstract
:1. Summary
2. Data Description
2.1. Hydrological Data (Folder: Hydro)
- 1.
- Hydrological model outputs (folders runoff and states),
- 2.
- Runoff characteristics (folder characteristics).
2.1.1. Hydrological Model Outputs
- (1)
- Runoff (folder runoff);
- (2)
- Model states (folder states).
- runoff
- –
- date index column (DD-MM-YYYY format);
- –
- ‘runoff’ (predicted river runoff, mm/day).
- states
- –
- date index column (DD-MM-YYYY format);
- –
- ‘soilstore’ (state of the soil reservoir that could characterize soil moisture dynamics, mm);
- –
- ‘snowpack’ (snow water equivalent, mm);
- –
- ‘meltwater’ (predicted amount of melted water mm).
2.1.2. Runoff Characteristics
- ‘sf_start’ (spring flood beginning, day from the 1 November);
- ‘sf_end’ (spring flood end, day from the 1 November);
- ‘sf_dur’ (spring flood duration, days);
- ‘sf_vol’ (spring flood runoff volume, mm);
- ‘sf_vol_ratio’ (ratio of spring flood runoff volume to total runoff volume, unitless);
- ‘sf_maxQ’ (spring flood maximum runoff, mm);
- ‘sf_maxd’ (day of spring flood maximum runoff, day from the 1 November);
- ‘sf_peaks_num’ (number of runoff peak during spring flood);
- ‘sf_mgn’ (spring flood magnitude, mm);
- ‘bfi’ (baseflow index, ratio between baseflow and total runoff volumes, unitless);
- ‘rf_vol’ (rain flood volume, mm);
- ‘rf_vol_ratio’ (ratio of rain flood volume to total runoff volume);
- ‘rf_maxQ’ (maximum runoff of rain flood, mm);
- ‘rf_maxd’ (day of rain flood maximum runoff, day from the 1 November);
- ‘rf_peaks_num’ (number of runoff peak during rain floods);
- ‘rf_periods_number’ (number of rain floods);
- ‘rf_duration_max’ (maximum duration of rain floods, days);
- ‘rf_duration_min’ (minimum duration of rain floods, days);
- ‘rf_duration_mean’ (mean duration of rain floods, days);
- ‘sf_ratio’ (, spring-flood-related ratio, unitless);
- ‘mar’ (mean annual runoff, mm).
- ‘flood_ratio’ (ratio of flood volume to total runoff volume);
- ‘bfi’ (baseflow index, ratio between baseflow and total runoff volumes, unitless);
- ‘peaks_num’ (number of flood peaks);
- ‘maxQ’ (maximum runoff, mm);
- ‘maxd’ (day of maximum runoff, day from the 1 November);
- ‘mgn’ (runoff magnitude, mm);
- ‘fl_periods_number’ (number of flood periods);
- ‘fl_duration_max’ (maximum duration of floods, days);
- ‘fl_duration_min’ (minimum duration of floods, days);
- ‘fl_duration_mean’ (mean duration of floods, days);
- ‘mar’ (mean annual runoff, mm).
2.2. Meteorological Data (Folder: Meteo)
- date index column (DD-MM-YYYY format);
- ‘T’ (mean air temperature, °C);
- ‘P’ (precipitation, mm/day);
- ‘PET’ (potential evaporation, mm/day).
- ‘T_mean’ (mean annual temperature, °C);
- ‘T_min’ (minimum annual temperature, °C);
- ‘T_max’ (maximum annual temperature, °C);
- ‘T_numdays_belowzero’ (number of days with mean daily temperature below zero);
- ‘T_numdays_thaw’ (number of days with above zero temperatures while snow);
- ‘T_sum_thaw’ (sum of air temperatures while thaw, °C);
- ‘P_sum’ (total annual of precipitation, mm);
- ‘P_max’ (maximum daily precipitation, mm);
- ‘P_numdays_rain’ (number of days with rain);
- ‘P_numdays_snow’ (number of days with snow);
- ‘P_sum_rain’ (sum of liquid precipitation, mm);
- ‘P_sum_snow’ (sum of solid precipitation, mm);
- ‘P_ratio_rain’ (ratio of liquid to total precipitation, unitless);
- ‘P_numdays_rainonsnow’ (number of days with rain-on-snow);
- ‘P_sum_rainonsnow’ (rain-on-snow precipitation sum, mm);
- ‘P_ratio_rainonsnow’ (ratio of rain-on-snow to total precipitation, unitless);
- ‘PET_sum’ (total annual potential evaporation, mm);
- ‘Snowpack_mean’ (mean snow water equivalent, mm);
- ‘Snowpack_max’ (max snow water equivalent, mm);
- ‘Snowpack_numdays’ (number of days while snow).
- ‘T_mean_(1...12)’ (mean monthly air temperature, °C);
- ‘T_sum_(1...12) (sum of monthly temperatures, °C)’;
- ‘P_sum_(1...12)’ (monthly precipitation, mm);
- ‘PET_sum_(1...12) (monthly potential evaporation, mm)’.
2.3. GIS Data (Folder: Gis)
- ‘idx’ (numerical index, number);
- ‘county’ (water management county, number);
- ‘name_ru’ (basin name in Russian Cyrillic letters);
- ‘name_en’ (basin name in English);
- ‘area’ (basin area based on AIS directory, km);
- ‘area_merit’ (basin area based on MERIT data [19], km2);
- ‘lat’ (latitude, degrees);
- ‘lon’ (longitude, degrees);
- ‘geometry’ (spatial representation of basin compatibe with geojson format).
3. Methods and Input Data
3.1. Input Data
3.2. Hydrological Modeling
Parameters | Description | Calibration Range |
---|---|---|
TT | Threshold temperature when precipitation is simulated as snowfall (C) | −2.5–2.5 |
SFCF | Snowfall gauge undercatch correction factor | 1–1.5 |
CWH | Water holding capacity of snow | 0–0.2 |
CFMAX | Melt rate of the snowpack (mm/(day*C)) | 0.5–5 |
CFR | Refreezing coefficient | 0–0.1 |
FC | Maximum water storage in the unsaturated-zone store (mm) | 50–700 |
LP | Soil moisture value above which actual evaporation reaches potential evaporation | 0.3–1 |
BETA | Shape coefficient of recharge function | 1–6 |
UZL | Threshold parameter for extra outflow from upper zone (mm) | 0–100 |
PERC | Maximum percolation to lower zone (mm/day) | 0–6 |
K0 | Additional recession coefficient of upper groundwater store (1/day) | 0.05–0.99 |
K1 | Recession coefficient of upper groundwater store (1/day) | 0.01–0.8 |
K2 | Recession coefficient of lower groundwater store (1/day) | 0.001–0.15 |
MAXBAS | Length of equilateral triangular weighting function (day) | 1–3 |
3.3. Runoff and Meteorological Characteristics Calculation
4. User Notes
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- UN World Water Development Report 2020. Available online: https://www.unwater.org/publications/world-water-development-report-2020/ (accessed on 25 June 2020).
- Blöschl, G.; Hall, J.; Viglione, A.; Perdigão, R.A.; Parajka, J.; Merz, B.; Lun, D.; Arheimer, B.; Aronica, G.T.; Bilibashi, A.; et al. Changing climate both increases and decreases European river floods. Nature 2019, 573, 108–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Blöschl, G.; Kiss, A.; Viglione, A.; Barriendos, M.; Böhm, O.; Brázdil, R.; Coeur, D.; Demarée, G.; Llasat, M.C.; Macdonald, N.; et al. Current European flood-rich period exceptional compared with past 500 years. Nature 2020, 583, 560–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pörtner, H.O.; Roberts, D.C.; Adams, H.; Adler, C.; Aldunce, P.; Ali, E.; Begum, R.A.; Betts, R.; Kerr, R.B.; Biesbroek, R.; et al. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability; IPCC Sixth Assessment Report; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Weart, S. The development of general circulation models of climate. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. Part B: Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 2010, 41, 208–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frieler, K.; Lange, S.; Piontek, F.; Reyer, C.P.O.; Schewe, J.; Warszawski, L.; Zhao, F.; Chini, L.; Denvil, S.; Emanuel, K.; et al. Assessing the impacts of 1.5 °C global warming—Simulation protocol of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP2b). Geosci. Model Dev. 2017, 10, 4321–4345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Golub, M.; Thiery, W.; Marcé, R.; Pierson, D.; Vanderkelen, I.; Mercado-Bettin, D.; Woolway, R.I.; Grant, L.; Jennings, E.; Kraemer, B.M.; et al. A framework for ensemble modelling of climate change impacts on lakes worldwide: The ISIMIP Lake Sector. Geosci. Model Dev. 2022, 15, 4597–4623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ito, R.; Shiogama, H.; Nakaegawa, T.; Takayabu, I. Uncertainties in climate change projections covered by the ISIMIP and CORDEX model subsets from CMIP5. Geosci. Model Dev. 2020, 13, 859–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nasonova, O.N.; Gusev, Y.M.; Kovalev, E.E.; Ayzel, G.V.; Panysheva, K.M. Projecting Changes in Russian Northern River Runoff due to Possible Climate Change during the 21st Century: A Case Study of the Northern Dvina, Taz and Indigirka Rivers. Water Resour. 2019, 46, S145–S154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gusev, E.M.; Nasonova, O.N.; Kovalev, E.E.; Ayzel, G.V. Impact of Possible Climate Change on Extreme Annual Runoff from River Basins Located in Different Regions of the Globe. Water Resour. 2019, 46, S126–S136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, S.; Kumar, R.; Flörke, M.; Yang, T.; Hundecha, Y.; Kraft, P.; Gao, C.; Gelfan, A.; Liersch, S.; Lobanova, A.; et al. Evaluation of an ensemble of regional hydrological models in 12 large-scale river basins worldwide. Clim. Change 2017, 141, 381–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krysanova, V.; Vetter, T.; Eisner, S.; Huang, S.; Pechlivanidis, I.; Strauch, M.; Gelfan, A.; Kumar, R.; Aich, V.; Arheimer, B.; et al. Intercomparison of regional-scale hydrological models and climate change impacts projected for 12 large river basins worldwide—A synthesis. Environ. Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 105002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayzel, G. Runoff for Russia (RFR v1.0), 2022. Available online: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7082269 (accessed on 10 January 2023).
- Arsenault, R.; Bazile, R.; Ouellet Dallaire, C.; Brissette, F. CANOPEX: A Canadian hydrometeorological watershed database. Hydrol. Process. 2016, 30, 2734–2736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Addor, N.; Newman, A.J.; Mizukami, N.; Clark, M.P. The CAMELS data set: Catchment attributes and meteorology for large-sample studies. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2017, 21, 5293–5313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Arsenault, R.; Brissette, F.; Martel, J.L.; Troin, M.; Lévesque, G.; Davidson-Chaput, J.; Gonzalez, M.C.; Ameli, A.; Poulin, A. A comprehensive, multisource database for hydrometeorological modeling of 14,425 North American watersheds. Sci. Data 2020, 7, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hallouin, T. Eflowcalc: A Streamflow Characteristics Calculator in Python. 2021. Available online: 10.5281/zenodo.4721439 (accessed on 10 January 2023).
- A Streamflow Characteristics Calculator in Python. Available online: https://thibhlln.github.io/eflowcalc/index.html (accessed on 2 November 2022).
- Yamazaki, D.; Ikeshima, D.; Sosa, J.; Bates, P.D.; Allen, G.H.; Pavelsky, T.M. MERIT Hydro: A High-Resolution Global Hydrography Map Based on Latest Topography Dataset. Water Resour. Res. 2019, 55, 5053–5073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- HydroATLAS. Available online: hydrosheds.org/hydroatlas (accessed on 2 November 2022).
- Ayzel, G.; Izhitskiy, A. Climate Change Impact Assessment on Freshwater Inflow into the Small Aral Sea. Water 2019, 11, 2377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ayzel, G.; Kurochkina, L.; Zhuravlev, S. The influence of regional hydrometric data incorporation on the accuracy of gridded reconstruction of monthly runoff. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2022, 67, 2429–2440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayzel, G. OpenForecast v2: Development and Benchmarking of the First National-Scale Operational Runoff Forecasting System in Russia. Hydrology 2021, 8, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayzel, G. Machine Learning Reveals a Significant Shift in Water Regime Types Due to Projected Climate Change. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2021, 10, 660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lange, S. Bias correction of surface downwelling longwave and shortwave radiation for the EWEMBI dataset. Earth Syst. Dyn. 2018, 9, 627–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lange, S. Trend-preserving bias adjustment and statistical downscaling with ISIMIP3BASD (v1.0). Geosci. Model Dev. 2019, 12, 3055–3070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lange, S. EartH2Observe, WFDEI and ERA-Interim data Merged and Bias-corrected for ISIMIP (EWEMBI). V. 1.1. GFZ Data Services. 2019. Available online: https://doi.org/10.5880/pik.2019.004 (accessed on 10 January 2023).
- Döll, P.; Trautmann, T.; Gerten, D.; Schmied, H.M.; Ostberg, S.; Saaed, F.; Schleussner, C.F. Risks for the global freshwater system at 1.5 °C and 2 °C global warming. Environ. Res. Lett. 2018, 13, 044038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gelfan, A.; Kalugin, A.; Krylenko, I.; Nasonova, O.; Gusev, Y.; Kovalev, E. Does a successful comprehensive evaluation increase confidence in a hydrological model intended for climate impact assessment? Clim. Change 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bergström, S.; Forsman, A. Development of a conceptual deterministic rainfall-runoff model. Hydrol. Res. 1973, 4, 147–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lindström, G. A simple automatic calibration routine for the HBV model. Hydrol. Res. 1997, 28, 153–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Oudin, L.; Hervieu, F.; Michel, C.; Perrin, C.; Andréassian, V.; Anctil, F.; Loumagne, C. Which potential evapotranspiration input for a lumped rainfall–runoff model?: Part 2—Towards a simple and efficient potential evapotranspiration model for rainfall–runoff modelling. J. Hydrol. 2005, 303, 290–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seibert, J.; Bergström, S. A retrospective on hydrological catchment modelling based on half a century with the HBV model. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2022, 26, 1371–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teutschbein, C.; Seibert, J. Bias correction of regional climate model simulations for hydrological climate-change impact studies: Review and evaluation of different methods. J. Hydrol. 2012, 456–457, 12–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Veijalainen, N.; Lotsari, E.; Alho, P.; Vehviläinen, B.; Käyhkö, J. National scale assessment of climate change impacts on flooding in Finland. J. Hydrol. 2010, 391, 333–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beck, H.E.; van Dijk, A.I.J.M.; de Roo, A.; Miralles, D.G.; McVicar, T.R.; Schellekens, J.; Bruijnzeel, L.A. Global-scale regionalization of hydrologic model parameters. Water Resour. Res. 2016, 52, 3599–3622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Storn, R.; Price, K. Differential evolution—A simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J. Glob. Optim. 1997, 11, 341–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nash, J.E.; Sutcliffe, J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 1970, 10, 282–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schaefli, B.; Gupta, H.V. Do Nash values have value? Hydrol. Process. 2007, 21, 2075–2080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mizukami, N.; Rakovec, O.; Newman, A.J.; Clark, M.P.; Wood, A.W.; Gupta, H.V.; Kumar, R. On the choice of calibration metrics for “high-flow” estimation using hydrologic models. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2019, 23, 2601–2614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liu, D. A rational performance criterion for hydrological model. J. Hydrol. 2020, 590, 125488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roudier, P.; Andersson, J.C.; Donnelly, C.; Feyen, L.; Greuell, W.; Ludwig, F. Projections of future floods and hydrological droughts in Europe under a+ 2 C global warming. Clim. Change 2016, 135, 341–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rets, E.; Kireeva, M.; Samsonov, T.; Ezerova, N.; Gorbarenko, A.; Frolova, N. Algorithm grwat for Automated Hydrograph Separation by BI Kudelin’s Method: Problems and Perspectives. Water Resour. 2022, 49, 23–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliphant, T.E. Guide to Numpy, 2nd ed.; Continuum Press: Austin, TX, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Jones, E.; Oliphant, T.; Peterson, P. SciPy: Open source scientific tools for Python. 2018. Available online: https://scipy.org/ (accessed on 10 January 2023).
- Linke, S.; Lehner, B.; Ouellet Dallaire, C.; Ariwi, J.; Grill, G.; Anand, M.; Beames, P.; Burchard-Levine, V.; Maxwell, S.; Moidu, H.; et al. Global hydro-environmental sub-basin and river reach characteristics at high spatial resolution. Sci. Data 2019, 6, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ayzel, G. Runoff for Russia (RFR v1.0): Computational Codes. 2022. Available online: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7305133 (accessed on 10 January 2023).
- Moges, E.; Demissie, Y.; Larsen, L.; Yassin, F. Review: Sources of Hydrological Model Uncertainties and Advances in Their Analysis. Water 2020, 13, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nasonova, O.N.; Gusev, Y.M.; Kovalev, E.E.; Ayzel, G.V. Climate change impact on streamflow in large-scale river basins: Projections and their uncertainties sourced from GCMs and RCP scenarios. Proc. Int. Assoc. Hydrol. Sci. 2018, 379, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ayzel, G. Runoff for Russia (RFR v1.0): The Large-Sample Dataset of Simulated Runoff and Its Characteristics. Data 2023, 8, 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/data8020031
Ayzel G. Runoff for Russia (RFR v1.0): The Large-Sample Dataset of Simulated Runoff and Its Characteristics. Data. 2023; 8(2):31. https://doi.org/10.3390/data8020031
Chicago/Turabian StyleAyzel, Georgy. 2023. "Runoff for Russia (RFR v1.0): The Large-Sample Dataset of Simulated Runoff and Its Characteristics" Data 8, no. 2: 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/data8020031