Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Two-Phase Bubble Columns: A Comprehensive Review
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
The Effects of the Properties of Gases on the Design of Bubble Columns Equipped with a Fine Pore Sparger
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
ChemEngineering 2018, 2(1), 12; https://doi.org/10.3390/chemengineering2010012

Hydrodynamics of Bubble Columns: Turbulence and Population Balance Model

Chemical Engineering Department, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, J1K 2R1, Canada
Current address: Research Center in Aerospace Engineering, Cenaero, 6041 Gosselies, Belgium.
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 13 February 2018 / Revised: 10 March 2018 / Accepted: 12 March 2018 / Published: 19 March 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bubble Column Fluid Dynamics)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1037 KB, uploaded 19 March 2018]   |  

Abstract

This paper presents an in-depth numerical analysis on the hydrodynamics of a bubble column. As in previous works on the subject, the focus here is on three important parameters characterizing the flow: interfacial forces, turbulence and inlet superficial Gas Velocity (UG). The bubble size distribution is taken into account by the use of the Quadrature Method of Moments (QMOM) model in a two-phase Euler-Euler approach using the open-source Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) code OpenFOAM (Open Field Operation and Manipulation). The interfacial forces accounted for in all the simulations presented here are drag, lift and virtual mass. For the turbulence analysis in the water phase, three versions of the Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) k-ε turbulence model are examined: namely, the standard, modified and mixture variants. The lift force proves to be of major importance for a trustworthy prediction of the gas volume fraction profiles for all the (superficial) gas velocities tested. Concerning the turbulence, the mixture k-ε model is seen to provide higher values of the turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate in comparison to the other models, and this clearly affects the prediction of the gas volume fraction in the bulk region, and the bubble-size distribution. In general, the modified k-ε model proves to be a good compromise between modeling simplicity and accuracy in the study of bubble columns of the kind undertaken here. View Full-Text
Keywords: two-phase flow; bubble column; Euler-Euler; QMOM; turbulence two-phase flow; bubble column; Euler-Euler; QMOM; turbulence
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Braga Vieira, C.; Litrico, G.; Askari, E.; Lemieux, G.; Proulx, P. Hydrodynamics of Bubble Columns: Turbulence and Population Balance Model. ChemEngineering 2018, 2, 12.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
ChemEngineering EISSN 2305-7084 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top