Next Article in Journal
Next Article in Special Issue
Previous Article in Journal
Previous Article in Special Issue
Toxics 2014, 2(2), 115-133; doi:10.3390/toxics2020115
Review

Evaluation of Glycol Ether as an Alternative to Perchloroethylene in Dry Cleaning

1
, 1
 and 1,2,*
Received: 3 January 2014; in revised form: 25 February 2014 / Accepted: 18 March 2014 / Published: 3 April 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Risk Assessment of Environmental Contaminants)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [542 KB, uploaded 3 April 2014]   |   Browse Figures
Abstract: Perchloroethylene (PCE) is a highly utilized solvent in the dry cleaning industry because of its cleaning effectiveness and relatively low cost to consumers. According to the 2006 U.S. Census, approximately 28,000 dry cleaning operations used PCE as their principal cleaning agent. Widespread use of PCE is problematic because of its adverse impacts on human health and environmental quality. As PCE use is curtailed, effective alternatives must be analyzed for their toxicity and impacts to human health and the environment. Potential alternatives to PCE in dry cleaning include dipropylene glycol n-butyl ether (DPnB) and dipropylene glycol tert-butyl ether (DPtB), both promising to pose a relatively smaller risk. To evaluate these two alternatives to PCE, we established and scored performance criteria, including chemical toxicity, employee and customer exposure levels, impacts on the general population, costs of each system, and cleaning efficacy. The scores received for PCE were 5, 5, 3, 5, 3, and 3, respectively, and DPnB and DPtB scored 3, 1, 2, 2, 4, and 4, respectively. An aggregate sum of the performance criteria yielded a favorably low score of “16” for both DPnB and DPtB compared to “24” for PCE. We conclude that DPnB and DPtB are preferable dry cleaning agents, exhibiting reduced human toxicity and a lesser adverse impact on human health and the environment compared to PCE, with comparable capital investments, and moderately higher annual operating costs.
Keywords: dry cleaning; perchloroethylene; dipropylene glycol n-butyl ether; dipropylene glycol tert-butyl ether dry cleaning; perchloroethylene; dipropylene glycol n-butyl ether; dipropylene glycol tert-butyl ether
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Hesari, N.; Francis, C.M.; Halden, R.U. Evaluation of Glycol Ether as an Alternative to Perchloroethylene in Dry Cleaning. Toxics 2014, 2, 115-133.

AMA Style

Hesari N, Francis CM, Halden RU. Evaluation of Glycol Ether as an Alternative to Perchloroethylene in Dry Cleaning. Toxics. 2014; 2(2):115-133.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hesari, Nikou; Francis, Chelsea M.; Halden, Rolf U. 2014. "Evaluation of Glycol Ether as an Alternative to Perchloroethylene in Dry Cleaning." Toxics 2, no. 2: 115-133.

Toxics EISSN 2305-6304 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert