Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Guava Pulp Microencapsulated in Mucilage of Aloe Vera and Opuntia ficus-indica as a Natural Dye for Yogurt: Functional Characterization and Color Stability
Previous Article in Journal
Encapsulation of Mesona chinensis Benth Extract in Alginate Beads Enhances the Stability and Antioxidant Activity of Polyphenols under Simulated Gastrointestinal Digestion
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fluoride Exposure from Soybean Beverage Consumption: A Toxic Risk Assessment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessment of Heavy Metal Uptake in Potatoes Cultivated in a Typical Karst Landform, Weining County, China

State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Green Pesticide and Agricultural Bioengineering, Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide and Agricultural Bioengineering, Ministry of Education, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2022, 11(15), 2379; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11152379
Submission received: 11 July 2022 / Revised: 30 July 2022 / Accepted: 3 August 2022 / Published: 8 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Food Toxicology and Food Preservation: Risk Evaluation)

Abstract

:
The average content of heavy metals in Weining soil of karst landforms is generally higher than that of other agricultural regions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the heavy metal content in potatoes from Weining county and to analyze the correlation between the content of heavy metals in potatoes planted in the soil of karst landform and the soil’s environmental factors (soil heavy metals, soil pH, soil organic matter, altitude). Weining county (Guizhou province, China) is a typical karst landform, and has a potato production yield of 2.7 million tons. In this study, 56 soil and potato samples were collected from Weining county and the heavy metal content in the soils and potatoes was detected by inductively coupled plasma atomic mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The content of Cr, Ni, and As in the soil was found to be higher, with almost half of the samples exceeding the maximum allowable levels. A total of 9 of the 56 samples tested had pollution load index values greater than 1.0, which indicates serious soil pollution. It was found that the ability of the potato to absorb heavy metals from the soil was very low, with the average bio-concentration factors of the metals Zn, Cu, Pb, Cr, Ni, and As being 0.087, 0.088, 0.0028, 0.0034, 0.0066, and less than 0.001, respectively. The content of the six heavy metals in the potatoes were all lower than the maximum permissible limit. The results show that a high As content in the soil could increase the content of Pb in potatoes, that a lower pH was beneficial to the bioaccumulation of Cr and Ni in potatoes, and that a high altitude is detrimental to the bioaccumulation of zinc and copper in potatoes. The HRI ranged between 1.12 × 10−2 and 5.92 × 10−2.

1. Introduction

With the rapid economic development occurring around the world, heavy metal pollution is common, and the area and degree of pollution is increasing, which poses a serious threat to the safety of agricultural production and human health [1,2]. Heavy metal pollution in crops has attracted significant attention as of late. The accumulation of heavy metals in soils is a major factor determining the high levels of heavy metals found in crops. The bioaccumulation of heavy metals—especially zinc (Zn), cuprum (Cu), lead (Pb), arsenic (As), chromium (Cr), nickel (Ni), and cadmium (Cd)—in the food chain presents a serious threat to human health [3,4]. For example, Pb poisoning can cause drowsiness, vomiting, irritability, loss of appetite, dizziness, and in severe cases, it can result in a coma or death [5]. Long-term exposure to Ni can also have serious health consequences, including rashes, fatigue, headaches, dizziness, respiratory diseases, decreased lung function, and even fatal cardiac arrest [6].
The potato is the most important non-grain food crop in the world. It is an important source of food owing to the energy, starch, vitamins, and minerals it contains [7]. Due to the growing demand for the food crop, Chinese potato production and exports to the international market are increasing year by year. Known as the ‘Hometown of the Southern China Potato’, Weining county ranks first in terms of the potato production in Guizhou province. At an elevation of nearly 2200 m, Weining county is the highest county in the province. It possesses a low average temperature and long hours of sunshine that make it highly suitable for potato farming. Weining county has a potato cultivation area of 1100 km2, with a total output of 2.7 million tons. The income earned from potato planting accounts for more than 20% of the average annual income of the county’s residents.
Located in western Guizhou province, Weining county is a typical karst landform composed of numerous types of limestone. It contains a large amount of Cd, As, Cu, Cr, and Zn in the carbonate rock and soil and is rich in mineral deposits [8,9]. According to the 2016 Bulletin on Geological Environment of Guizhou province, Guizhou had 4503 small-scale mines, including coal, phosphate, Fe, Zn, and Hg mines [10]. When comparing the content of heavy metals in different agricultural soils (Table S1), it is found that the average content of Cu, Cr, Zn, As, Pb, and Ni in Weining soils of karst landforms are generally higher than those in other regions [1,11,12,13,14,15,16]. In Weining county and the adjacent Hezhang county, many handmade Zn mining areas have existed since the 17th century. Zn smelting activities nearly ceased in 2004 due to concerns related to food safety and environmental pollution [17,18]. The vegetable uptake of metals is one of the major pathways through which soil metals enter into the food chain. Potatoes are in close contact with the soil, and they are buried in the soil for several months before ripening. Therefore, the content of Zn, Cu, Pb, Ni, and other heavy metals in potatoes has always been the focus of attention. Related studies have also reported the content of heavy metals such as Zn, Cu, Pb, and Ni in potatoes and soils [1,19,20,21].
However, Weining county, the primary production area for potatoes in China, has a karst landform that gives it different characteristics from the other major potato-producing areas in the world. Our group has reported that the concentrations of Cd were 0.41 to 10.0 mg/kg in the soil and were 0.023 to 0.18 mg/kg in the potatoes in Weining county. A regression model to predict the concentration of cadmium in the potatoes based on soil properties was developed in Weining county [22]. To date, no analysis has been performed regarding the heavy metal content (such as Cu, Cr, Zn, As, Pb, and Ni) of potatoes from Weining county. The correlation between the presence of heavy metals (such as Cu, Cr, Zn, As, Pb, and Ni) in potatoes and the environmental factors present in the karst landforms has not been investigated.
In this study, we analyzed and tested 56 samples from 15 towns and determined the Cu, Cr, Zn, As, Pb, and Ni concentrations in soils and potatoes in Weining county. The correlation between the concentrations of these heavy metals in potatoes and the environmental factors was analyzed. The bioconcentration factor (BCF), pollution load index (PLI), daily intake of metal (DIM), and health risk index (HRI) were obtained. Further safety assessments were carried out based on the daily consumption of potatoes cultivated in karst landforms.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

Weining county, located in the western part of Guizhou province (103°36′–104°45′ E, 26°36′–27°26′ N), has a total area of 6295 km2. The potato and soil samples were collected from the same 25 m2 open field area. A total of 56 soil samples and 56 potato samples were collected from 15 towns in the county. A sampling map of 56 potatoes and soil is shown in Figure 1.

2.2. Collection of Samples

Approximately 2 kg of soil samples were selected from 7 locations in the vegetable field (0 to 25 cm). The soil samples were mixed and homogenized, placed in polyethene bags, and sent to the laboratory. Air-dried soil samples were passed through a 2 mm nylon mesh sieve.
Approximately 2 kg of potato samples were randomly selected at 7 corresponding soil locations and taken to the laboratory. After washing with distilled water, the potatoes were chopped, repeatedly sampled using a quarter method, dried in an oven at 65 °C for 4 days, and weighed before and after drying to calculate their moisture content. The moisture content of each potato sample was shown in Table S2 in the supporting information.

2.3. Sample Processing

A total of 0.1 g (accurate to 0.0001 g) of soil sample was placed into a digester and mixed with 2 mL of concentrated nitric acid and 1 mL of hydrofluoric acid [23]. Next, the digester was covered, placed in an oven for digestion at 180 °C for 8 h and cooled overnight. The acid was evaporated away by placing the digester on a 180 °C plate until it was nearly dry. Then, it was cooled to room temperature and the residue in the digester was washed with 2% HNO3 and transferred into a 25 mL volumetric flask. The digested solution was analyzed using inductively coupled plasma atomic mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Each sample was analyzed in triplicate. The method was verified using soil material standards (GSS-14 and GSS-4). The relative standard deviation of the parallel determinations of heavy metal concentrations in the soil samples was less than 15%.
A total of 0.5 g (accurate to 0.0001 g) of potato sample was placed into a 50 mL beaker, mixed with 10 mL of nitric acid, covered with a porcelain lid, and allowed to soak overnight. The next day, 2 mL of perchloric acid was added. Digestion continued on a hot plate at 180 °C until the solution became colorless [24]. Afterwards, the lid was removed, and the digestion solution was evaporated to near dryness at 140 °C. The residue was dissolved in 2% HNO3 and transferred to a 25 mL volumetric flask. The concentration of Zn, Cu, Pb, As, Cr, and Ni in digestive juice was determined using ICP-MS. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate. The national standard carrot sample GSB-25 and tangerine sample GSB-11 were used to control the accuracy of the method. The relative standard deviations for the determination of the parallel of heavy metal concentrations in the potatoes were all less than 15%.

3. Data Analysis

All the data were analyzed using SPSS 17.0. The K-means clustering algorithm analysis of the content of each metal was used to identify groups, then the significance analysis was evaluated between groups at p < 0.05. The Pearson correlation test was used to analyze the correlation between the content of heavy metals in the potatoes and soil organic matter (OM), soil pH, and elevation.
Other parameters, such as the BCF, PLI, DIM, and HRI, were also determined.
This section may be divided by subheadings. It should provide a concise and precise description of the experimental results, their interpretation, as well as the experimental conclusions that can be drawn.

3.1. Analysis of Soil pH and OM

The soil and water were mixed at 1:2.5 and the pH was measured with a Sartorius pH meter. Deoxidation was performed with K2Cr2O7 and then the titration method was used to determine the content of organic matter in the soil [25]. Each sample was made in three parallels during the process. In this study, the soil pH varied from 4.36~8.41, with an average value of 5.74. The amount of organic matter (OM) varied from 12.3~102 g/kg with an average value of 50.7 g/kg, as shown in Table 1.

3.2. Bioconcentration Factor

To study the transfer of metals from the soil to the potatoes, the BCF values were calculated as follows [4,26].
BCF = Cpotato/Csoil
Cpotato and Csoil represent the concentrations of heavy metals in the potato and soil (dry weight), respectively.

3.3. Pollution Load Index of the Soil

The extent of pollution by trace metals was assessed by employing the method based on PLI developed by Tomlinson et al. [27], expressed by the following equations:
Contamination Factor (CF) = Csoil/CPML
PLI = (CF1 × CF2 × CF3……CFn)1/n
where Csoil represents the concentration of heavy metal in soil and CPML represents the permissible maximum limit set by the World Health Organization for heavy metals in the soil. CF = contamination factor and n = number of metals [28].

3.4. Daily Intake of Metals from Potatoes and the Associated Health Risk Index

A health risk assessment for consumers based on their intake of metal-contaminated crops was characterized using an HRI. The HRI value was calculated using the formula below [29,30,31].
HRI = DIM/RfD
where DIM (mg/kg/day) is the daily intake of heavy metals via the exposure pathway through the ingestion of vegetables and RfD is the reference dose. The DIM value was calculated using the following formula [32,33].
DIM = Cmetal × Dfood intake/Baverage weight
Cmetal represents the concentration of heavy metals in the potato (fresh weight), Dfood intake represents the average ingestion of potatoes per day (0.128 kg) in 2014 [6], and the Baverage weight represents the average body weight for adults, equal to 60 kg [34]. The RfD standard values recommended by the ‘Integrated Risk Information System’ for Zn, Cu, As, and Ni are 0.37, 0.04, 3 × 10−4, and 0.02 mg kg−1 day−1, respectively [35]. The RfD value for Pb was 0.0035 mg kg−1 day−1 [36] and Cr was 1.38 × 10−2 mg kg−1 day−1 [6].

4. Results

4.1. Assessment of Heavy Metals in the Soil Sample

The concentrations of heavy metals Zn, Cu, Pb, As, Cr, and Ni in soil are shown in Table 2 and Table S3 (in Supporting Information). The average concentrations of Zn, Cu, Pb, As, Cr, and Ni in the soils were 175, 47.8, 59.3, 25.8, 119, and 50.8 mg/kg. Zhang et al. [22] has reported that the average concentration of cadmium in Weining potato soil was 2.60 mg/kg. So, the concentration order of heavy metals in the potato cultivation soil of Weining county was Zn > Cr > Pb > Ni > Cu > As > Cd. The results of the cluster analysis show that when the number of the cluster was five, the difference between the various groups reached a significant level (p < 0.05). The maximum allowable levels of metal Zn, Cu, Pb, As, Cr, and Ni in the soil are as follows: 300, 100, 100, 20, 100, and 50 mg/kg, respectively [37]. In the 56 soil samples, the Zn content of 5 samples, Cu content of 2 samples, and Pb content of 3 samples were found to exceed the standard limit. However, the As content of 39 samples, Cr content of 35 samples, and the concentration of Ni in 26 samples were higher than the standard limit.
(abcde: Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant differences between groups, p < 0.05.).
The degree of soil metal contamination was determined by the comprehensive PLI. The pollution index was calculated based on the contamination factor of each metal [27]. If the PLI value of the metal in the soil is greater than 1, the soil is considered to be contaminated, while uncontaminated soil samples have PLI values less than 1 [38]. The PLI values of the 56 samples are shown in Figure 2 and Table S4 (in Supporting Information). The PLI ranged from 0.357 to 1.56. Nine of fifty-six samples in the Weining region had a PLI value greater than 1.0. The PLI values of soil samples #26, #31, and #32 exceeded 1.3. The Cr, Ni, and As content in the three soils all exceeded the limit values. The Zn content of soil samples #31 and #32 were also very high, with a Zn concentration of 371.8 and 468.6 mg/kg, respectively. (Table S3 in Supporting Information). The results of the cluster analysis show that when the number of cluster was five, the difference between the various groups reached a significant level (p < 0.05).

4.2. Assessment of Heavy Metals in the Potato Sample

The results of the heavy metal content in the potato samples are summarized in Table 3. The average concentrations of Zn, Cu, Pb, Cr, and Ni in the potatoes were 2.73, 0.675, 0.027, 0.072, and 0.055 mg/kg (fresh weight), respectively. The concentrations of As in all the potato samples were below the detection limit (0.01 mg/kg). The concentrations of each heavy metals in the potatoes were all below the permissible maximum limit [39]. Zhang et al. [22] reported that the average concentration of Cd in potatoes in Weining county is 0.083 mg/kg (fresh weight). The sequence of metal concentrations in the potatoes was Zn > Cu > Cd > Cr > Ni > Pb > As. The results of the cluster analysis show that when the number of the cluster was five, the difference between the various groups reached a significant level (p < 0.05).
The BCF reflects the plant’s ability to accumulate trace elements. Table 4 listed the BCF values for each metal element in potatoes. The average BCF of Zn, Cu, Pb, Cr, and Ni in the potatoes were 0.107, 0.088, 0.0028, 0.0034, and 0.0066, respectively. The average BCF for As was less than 0.001. The order of the BCFs of the metals (Zn, Cu, Pb, As, Cr, and Ni) in Weining County was Zn > Cu > Ni > Cr~Pb > As. The results of the cluster analysis show that when the number of the cluster was five, the difference between the various groups reached a significant level (p < 0.05).

4.3. Correlation between Heavy Metal Concentrations in Potatoes and the Environmental Parameters

In this study, the soil pH varied from 4.36–8.41, with an average value of 5.74. The amount of OM varied from 12.3–102 g/kg and the OM average value was 50.7 g/kg. The elevation varied from 2151–2744 m with an average value of 2359 m, as shown in Table 1.
The results of the correlation analysis (Pearson Correlation, 2-tailed) are shown in Table 5. It can be concluded that the content of As in the soil affects the content of Pb in the potatoes (Table 3), and there was a significant correlation between them (correlation coefficient = 0.301, p < 0.05). However, there was no correlation between the other metals in the soil and in the potatoes. There was a negative correlation between the pH of the soil and the Ni content (correlation coefficient = −0.591, p < 0.01) and Cr content (correlation coefficient = −0.344, p < 0.01) in the potatoes. There was no significant correlation between the OM content and the heavy metal content in the potatoes. Elevation affected the content of Zn (correlation coefficient = −0.292, p < 0.05) and Cu (correlation coefficient = −0.444, p < 0.01) in the potatoes.

4.4. Health Risk Index and Daily Intake of Metals of Potatoes

Potatoes are a very important global food crop. To measure the risk exposure to consumers, the HRI was used. First, the DIM was calculated using Equation (5). Many researchers have used the DIM value to assess human daily metal intake and its associated harm [40,41,42]. The DIM values in this study are shown in Table 6; the order of the DIM values was Zn > Cu > Cr > Ni > Pb > As. The DIM values of these metals did not exceed 5.81 × 10−3 mg/kg.
The reference values of the limits of daily heavy metal intake were obtained using the HRI. Then, the HRI was calculated using Equation (4) and is shown in Table 6. In this study, the values of the HRI for the six heavy metals varied from 0.0112 to 0.0592. The observed order was Ni > Cu > Pb > Zn > Cr > As (Table 6). There is no obvious risk to human health if the HRI is <1, but a risk is present if the HRI is >1 [29,32]. The HRI value indicates that the daily consumption of potatoes cultivated in Weining karst landforms does not pose a hazard to human health.

5. Discussion

The concentration order of various heavy metals in soils varies from place-to-place owing to the different soil backgrounds and pollution conditions. Golia et al. [1] has reported the order of concentrations of heavy metals in the soil of locally planted potatoes in Trikala was Zn (9.87 mg/kg) > Cu (0.925 mg/kg) > Pb (0.051 mg/kg) > Ni (0.024 mg/kg) > Cr (0.018 mg/kg) > Cd (0.015 mg/kg). Mehrdad et al. [13] has reported that the order of concentrations of heavy metals in the soil of locally planted potatoes in the Hamadan province, western Iran, was Zn (55.6 mg/kg) > Cr (40.1 mg/kg) > Ni (32.9 mg/kg) > Cu (26.8 mg/kg) > Pb (10.4 mg/kg) > As (8.60 mg/kg) > Cd (2.20 mg/kg). In this study, the concentration order of the heavy metals in the potato cultivation soil was Zn (175 mg/kg) > Cr (119 mg/kg) > Pb (59.3 mg/kg) > Ni (50.8 mg/kg) > Cu (47.8 mg/kg) > As (25.8 mg/kg) > Cd (2.60 mg/kg) [22]. It can be concluded that the content of heavy metals in the soil in the karst potato growing areas is higher than that in other potato growing areas. Since the 17th century, Zn smelting activities using indigenous methods have been carried out in Weining county [18], which may be the reason for the excessive Zn content in some places. Currently, Weining is a major agricultural production county. The research has found that the pollution of Cr, Ni, and As in the soil was more serious than previously believed.
Golia et al. [1] reported the concentration levels of heavy metals in potatoes (fresh weight) in the Trikala region: Zn (0.201 mg/kg) > Cu (0.101 mg/kg) > Cr (0.089 mg/kg) > Pb (0.077 mg/kg) > Ni (0.057 mg/kg) > Cd (0.008 mg/kg). Šrek [19] reported the concentrations of heavy metals in potatoes (dry weight) in the Ruzyne region to be in the following order: Zn (16.1 mg/kg) > Cu (4.30 mg/kg) > Pb (0.60 mg/kg) > Ni (0.58 mg/kg) > Cr (0.19 mg/kg) > As (0.06 mg/kg) > Cd (0.04 mg/kg). Gebrekidan et al. [20] reported that the concentrations of heavy metals in potatoes (dry weight) in the Tahtay region was Pb (2.58 mg/kg) > Cu (2.52 mg/kg) > Zn (1.40 mg/kg) > Cr (0.39 mg/kg) > Ni (0.25 mg/kg) > Cd (0.18 mg/kg). The average concentrations of heavy metals in Weining potatoes (fresh weight) were Zn (2.73 mg/kg) > Cu (0.675 mg/kg) > Cr (0.072 mg/kg) > Ni (0.055 mg/kg) > Pb (0.027 mg/kg) > As (<0.01 mg/kg), in our study. Evidently, the content levels of heavy metals in potatoes varied widely across the regions. The order of the levels of different heavy metals in potatoes is not the same in different agriculture soils.
Khan et al. [21] reported the order of the BCF of the heavy metals (Mo, As, Se, Fe, Cu, Zn, Ni, and Pb) in potatoes irrigated by underground water in the Punjab region of Pakistan region as Zn (20.2) > Cu (4.63) > Mo (1.27) > Ni (1.09) > Fe (1.05) > Se (0.35) > Pb (0.19) >As (0.06). Zhang et al. [22] reported that the average BCF of the heavy metal Cd in Weining potatoes was 0.24. The order of the BCFs of the metals (Zn, Cu, Pb, As, Cr, Cd, and Ni) in Weining County was Cd (0.24) > Zn (0.107) > Cu (0.088) > Ni (0.007 > Cr (0.003) ≈ Pb (0.003) > As (<0.001). In both studies, the ability of potatoes to absorb heavy metals from soil was found to be Zn > Cu > Ni > Pb > As; however, the ability of potatoes to absorb heavy metals was much larger in soils in central Punjab, Pakistan. Mehrdad et al. [13] reported the order of the BCF of the heavy metals (As, Ni, Cd, Cu, Pb, Cr, and Zn) in potatoes from soils that overused phosphate fertilizers in western Iran to be As (0.46) > Ni (0.41) > Cd (0.40) ≈ Cu (0.40) ≈ Pb (0.40) > Cr (0.39) ≈ Zn (0.39), which seemed to suggest to suggest that due to the effect of phosphate fertilizer, the BCF of the potato to various heavy metals tends to be the same (about 0.4). It can be concluded that there were also differences in the BCFs of metals in different conditions. Therefore, it was necessary to study the concentration and bioconcentration of heavy metals in potatoes cultivated in karst landforms.
The content of heavy metals in plants has been proven to be influenced by many factors, such as the content of heavy metals in the soil [4,43], soil pH [4,5,44], the amount of OM in the soil [4,22,45], and elevation [22]. Through the correlation analysis, it can be concluded that the content of metals found in potatoes cultivated in karst field environments of Weining were affected by many factors. In Weining, the high As content in the soil could increase the content of Pb in potatoes, the lower pH was beneficial to the bioaccumulation of Cr and Ni in potatoes, and the high altitude was detrimental to the bioaccumulation of zinc and copper in the potatoes.

6. Conclusions

Through an analysis of six heavy metals (Zn, Cu, Pb, As, Cr, and Ni) in the soil and potato samples, it can be concluded that the heavy metal pollution in Weining soil with a typical karst landform was caused by As, Cr, and Ni. The ability of the potato to absorb heavy metals from the soil was very small, so the concentration of heavy metals in potatoes was below the maximum threshold. There was a significant positive correlation between the content of As in the soil and the content of Pb in potatoes. The content of As in 70% of the soil samples exceeded the standard, which has a potential impact on the bioaccumulation of Pb in Weining potatoes. In this study, a lower pH was more favorable for the transfer of Ni and Cr to potatoes, and a high elevation was not a conducive factor for the bioaccumulation of Zn and Cu in the potatoes. The bioaccumulation of heavy metals (Zn, Cu, Pb, As, Cr, and Ni) in the potatoes and the HRI obtained by the DIM in this study were very low, further indicating that there is no potential health risk in the consumption of potatoes from the Weining karst landforms.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods11152379/s1, Table S1: Heavy metal content in soil in different agricultural regions (mg kg-1); Table S2: The environment parameters and moisture content in potato; Table S3: Heavy metal concentrations in 56 soil samples (mg/kg); Table S4: Pollution load index for metals in soil; Table S5: Heavy metal concentration in 56 potato samples (wet weight mg/kg). Table S6: Bio-concentration factor potato (dry weight)/soil system.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.S., Y.Z. and Q.L.; methodology, X.S., Y.Z. and P.D.; data curation, X.S. and Y.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, X.S. and Q.L.; writing—review and editing, Y.Z.; project administration, T.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2021YFD1700104), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21866009 and 21667007), the Technology Programs of Guizhou Province (No. [2018]5781), the Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities of China (111 Program, D20023), and the Frontiers Science Center for Asymmetric Synthesis and Medicinal Molecules, Department of Education, Guizhou Province [Qianjiaohe KY number (2020)004].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Golia, E.E.; Dimirkou, A.; Mitsios, I.K. Influence of some soil parameters on heavy metals accumulation by vegetables grown in agricultural soils of different soil orders. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2008, 81, 80–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Dong, J.; Yang, Q.W.; Sun, L.N.; Zeng, Q.; Liu, S.J.; Pan, J.; Liu, X.L. Assessing the concentration and potential dietary risk of heavy metals in vegetables at a Pb/Zn mine site. Environ. Earth Sci. 2011, 64, 1317–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Maiz, I.; Arambarri, I.; Garcia, R. Evaluation of heavy metal availability in polluted soils by two sequential extraction procedures using factor analysis. Environ. Pollut. 2000, 110, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Khan, Z.I.; Ahmad, K.; Akram, N.A.; Mehmood, N.; Yasmeen, S. Heavy metal contamination in water, soil and a potential vegetable garlic (Allium sativum L.) in Punjab, Pakistan. Pak. J. Bot 2017, 49, 547–552. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kashem, M.A.; Singh, B.R. The effect of fertilizer additions on the solubility and plant-availability of Cd, Ni and Zn in soil. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys. 2002, 62, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Stasinos, S.; Nasopoulou, C.; Tsikrika, C.; Zabetakis, I. The bioaccumulation and physiological effects of heavy metals in carrots, onions, and potatoes and dietary implications for Cr and Ni: A review. J. Food Sci. 2014, 79, 765–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Renu, T.; Kalpana, S. Assessment of heavy metal bioaccumulation in solanum tuberosum L., Cultivated on Artificially Fed Medium. J. Chem. Biol. Phys. Sci. 2013, 4, 78–84. [Google Scholar]
  8. He, S.L. Geochemical background of supergene sediments in Guizhou. Guizhou Geol. 1998, 8, 149–156. [Google Scholar]
  9. Li, Z.F. Division of karst landform in Guizhou. Guizhou Geol. 2011, 28, 177–181+234. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang, M.F.; Hu, Y.D.M.; Zhou, Q. Study on the prevention and control of mines geological disasters in Guizhou province based on geological and geomorphic features. China Min. 2017, 26, 91–95. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wiersma, D.; Berend, J.; Nicolaas, G. Cadmium, lead, mercury, and arsenic concentrations in crops and corresponding soils in the Netherlands. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1986, 34, 1067–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Huang, S.S.; Liao, Q.L.; Hua, M.; Wu, X.M.; Bi, K.S.; Yan, C.Y.; Chen, B.; Zhang, X.Y. Survey of heavy metal pollution and assessment of agricultural soil in Yangzhong district, Jiangsu province, China. Chemosphere 2007, 67, 2148–2155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Mehrdad, C.; Bahareh, L.; Hajar, M.; Nasim, R. Heavy metal risk assessment for potatoes grown in overused phosphate-fertilized soils. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2013, 185, 1825–1831. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang, Y.L.; Ji, T.W.; Yu, D.H.; Xiao, M. Investigation on heavy metal contents in soils and vegetables of some vegetable bases in zhejiang province. J. Zhejiang Agric. Sci. 2020, 61, 1310–1312. [Google Scholar]
  15. Shan, Z.Q.; Shi, S.M.; Ma, R.K.; Yang, X.L. Soil heavy metals pollution and ecological risk assessment in citrus production areas of Guigang, Guangxi province. Sichuan Environ. 2020, 39, 136–141. [Google Scholar]
  16. Marhaba, T.; Mamattursun, E.; Wang, W.W. Heavy metal contamination and potential ecological risk of vineyard soil in Turpan Basin. Environ. Monit. Chin. 2021, 37, 112–119. [Google Scholar]
  17. Bi, X.Y.; Feng, X.B.; Yang, Y.G.; Qiu, G.G.; Li, G.H.; Li, F.L.; Liu, T.Z.; Fu, Z.Y.; Jin, Z.S. Environmental contamination of heavy metals from zinc smelting areas in Hezhang County, western Guizhou, China. Environ. Int. 2006, 32, 883–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, G.; Feng, X.; Qiu, G.; Bi, X.; Li, Z.; Zhang, C.; Guo, Y. Environmental mercury contamination of an artisanal zinc smelting area in Weining County, Guizhou, China. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 154, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Šrek, P.; Hejcman, M.; Kunzová, E. Multivariate analysis of relationship between potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) yield, amount of applied elements, their concentrations in tubers and uptake in a long-term fertilizer experiment. Field Crops Res. 2010, 118, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gebrekidan, A.; Weldegebriel, Y.; Hadera, A.; Vander, B. Toxicological assessment of heavy metals accumulated in vegetables and fruits grown in Ginfel river near Sheba Tannery, Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2013, 95, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Khan, Z.I.; Ahmad, K.; Yasmeen, S.; Akram, N.A.; Ashraf, M.; Mehmood, N. Potential health risk assessment of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) grown on metal contaminated soils in the central zone of Punjab, Pakistan. Chemosphere 2017, 166, 157–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhang, Y.P.; Wu, Y.; Yang, A.M.; Wang, J.; Zhang, K.K.; Hu, D.Y. Assessment of cadmium content of potato grown in Weining County, Guizhou Province, China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2017, 189, 226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Briki, M.; Ji, H.B.; Li Cai Ding, H.J.; Gao, Y. Characterization, distribution, and risk assessment of heavy metals in agricultural soil and products around mining and smelting areas of Hezhang, China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2015, 187, 767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ministry of Health. Determination of Multiple Elements in Foods (GB/T 5009. 268); Ministry of Health: Beijing, China, 2016.
  25. Lu, R.K. Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis; Chinese Agricultural: Beijing, China, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  26. Cui, Y.J.; Zhu, Y.G.; Zhai, R.H.; Chen, D.Y.; Huang, Y.Z.; Qiu, Y.; Liang, J.Z. Transfer of metals from soil to vegetables in an area near a smelter in nanning, China. Environ. Int. 2004, 30, 785–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Tomlinson, D.L.; Wilson, J.G.; Harris, C.R.; Jeffrey, D.W. Problems in the assessment of heavy-metal levels in estuaries and the formation of a pollution index. Helgoländer Meeresunters. 1980, 33, 566–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Okbah, M.A.; Nasr, S.M.; Soliman, N.F.; Khairy, M.A. Distribution and contamination status of trace metals in the mediterranean coastal sediments, Egypt. Soil Sediment Contam. 2014, 23, 656–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xue, Z.J.; Liu, S.Q.; Liu, Y.L.; Yan, Y.L. Health risk assessment of heavy metals for edible parts of vegetables grown in sewage-irrigated soils in suburbs of baoding city, China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2012, 184, 3503–3513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Neeratanaphan, L.; Khamma, S.; Benchawattananon, R.; Ruchuwararak, P.; Appamaraka, S.; Intamat, S. Heavy metal accumulation in rice oryza sativa near electronic waste dumps and related human health risk assessment. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 2017, 23, 1086–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rachaneekorn, M.; Suwalee, W. Heavy metal contamination near industrial estate areas in Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya province, Thailand and human health risk assessment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1890. [Google Scholar]
  32. USEPA. Region 9, Preliminary Remediation Goals; USEPA: Washington, DC, USA, 2002. Available online: http://www.epa.Gov/region09/waste/sfund/prg (accessed on 1 July 2022).
  33. Karthik, D.; Vijayarekha, K. Chemometric identification of a few heavy metals, pesticides and plasticides in edible sunflower oil for health risk assessment. Int. J. Food Prop. 2018, 21, 1442–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, X.; Sato, T.; Xing, B.; Tao, S. Health risks of heavy metals to the general public in Tianjin, China via consumption of vegetables and fish. Sci. Total Environ. 2005, 350, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). Integrated Risk Information System. 2010. Available online: http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/compare.cfm (accessed on 1 July 2022).
  36. Sriramachari, S.; Jain, A.K. Trace elements in human nutrition and health. Indian J. Med. Res. 1997, 105, 246–247. [Google Scholar]
  37. Chiroma, T.M.; Ebewele, R.O.; Hymore, F.K. Comparative assessment of heavy metal levels in soil, vegetables and urban grey waste water used for irrigation in Yola and Kano. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 2014, 3, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  38. Harikumar, P.S.; Nasir, U.P.; Rahman, M.M. Distribution of heavy metals in the core sediments of a tropical wetland system. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 6, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. FAO/WHO. Expert Committee on Food Additives; FAO: Rome, Italy; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  40. Arora, M.; Kiran, B.; Rani, S.; Rani, A.; Kaur, B.; Mittal, N. Heavy metal accumulation in vegetables irrigated with water from different sources. Food Chem. 2008, 111, 811–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chary, N.S.; Kamala, C.T.; Raj, D.S.S. Assessing risk of heavy metals from consuming food grown on sewage irrigated soils and food chain transfer. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2008, 69, 513–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Khan, S.; Cao, Q.; Zheng, Y.M.; Huang, Y.Z.; Zhu, Y.G. Health risks of heavy metals in contaminated soils and food crops irrigated with wastewater in Beijing, China. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 152, 686–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ahmad, K.; Khan, Z.I.; Ashfaq, A.; Ashraf, M.; Yasmin, S. Assessment of heavy metal and metalloid levels in spinach (spinacia oleracea l.) grown in wastewater irrigated agricultural soil of sargodha, Pakistan. Pak. J. Bot. 2014, 46, 1805–1810. [Google Scholar]
  44. Davies, B.E.; Bailinger, R.C. Heavy metals in soils in north Somerset, England, with special reference to contamination from base metal mining in the Mendips. Environ. Geochem. Health 1990, 12, 291–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Walker, D.J.; Clemente, R.; Roig, A.; Bernal, M.P. The effects of soil amendments on heavy metal bioavailability in two contaminated Mediterranean soils. Environ. Pollut. 2003, 122, 303–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A sampling map of 56 potatoes and soil.
Figure 1. A sampling map of 56 potatoes and soil.
Foods 11 02379 g001
Figure 2. Pollution load index (PLI) distribution of 56 locations’ soil. (abcde: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between groups, p < 0.05.)
Figure 2. Pollution load index (PLI) distribution of 56 locations’ soil. (abcde: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between groups, p < 0.05.)
Foods 11 02379 g002
Table 1. The environmental parameters and moisture content in potatoes.
Table 1. The environmental parameters and moisture content in potatoes.
ContentspHOMElevation (m)Moisture Content (%)
Range4.36–8.4112.3–101.92151–27440.78–0.85
Mean5.74 50.7 23600.81
Median5.4548.3523320.81
Table 2. Analysis of variance for metals concentrations (mg/kg) in soil (n = 56).
Table 2. Analysis of variance for metals concentrations (mg/kg) in soil (n = 56).
MetalsZnCuPbAsCrNi
Mean ± SD181 ± 81.747.8 ± 22.059.3 ± 20.925.8 ± 10.1119 ± 41.250.8 ± 15.6
Maximum value46913111562.829297.2
Minimum value62.818.920.09.7462.124.9
Median16341.452.723.510847.6
GroupNumber167317224
Range62.8–131 a18.9–26.4 a20.0–29.2 a9.74–19.3 a62.1–100 a24.9–29.65 a
Number253036222425
Range137–202 b32.8–45.9 b36.3–68.9 b20.3–29.0 b104–135 b32.0–47.7 b
Number1010814618
Range211–292 c49.3–64.6 c72.2–77.8 c30.9–41.0 c145–183 c49.8–63.4 c
Number476237
Range334–377 d67.2–88.5 d80.5–95.2 d44.5–49.5 d198.9–225 d68.0–77.8 d
Number123112
Range469 e131–131 e104–115 e62.8 e292 e93.1–97.2 e
Exceeding the maximum permissible sample size523393526
Permissible Maximum limit (mg/kg)30010010020.010050.0
(abcde: Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant differences between groups, p < 0.05.).
Table 3. Analysis of variance for metals concentrations (mg/kg) in potatoes (fresh weight n = 56).
Table 3. Analysis of variance for metals concentrations (mg/kg) in potatoes (fresh weight n = 56).
MetalsZnCuPbAs *CrNi
Mean ± SD2.73 ± 1.020.675 ± 0.2280.027 ± 0.018<0.0100.072 ± 0.1530.055 ± 0.032
Maximum value7.421.180.095<0.0100.6590.202
Minimum value1.560.2320.010<0.0100.0100.018
Median2.480.6600.024<0.0100.0230.047
GroupNumber20516--4617
Range1.56–2.22 a0.232–0.327 a0.010–0.017 a--0.010–0.036 a0.018–0.036 a
Number211519--517
Range2.35–3.02 b0.397–0.561 b0.018–0.025 b--0.042–0.107 b0.039–0.052 b
Number121413--112
Range3.07–4.20 c0.574–0.71 c0.029–0.038 c--0.492 c0.059–0.079 c
Number2126--39
Range5.04–5.15 d0.744–0.907 d0.043–0.054 d--0.529–0.543 d0.086–0.109 d
Number1102--11
Range7.42 e0.964–1.18 e0.094–0.095 e--0.659 e0.202 e
Exceeding the maximum permissible sample size000000
Permissible maximum limit (mg/kg)60400.372.367.90
(* below the test line 0.01 mg/kg; abcde: Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant differences between groups, p < 0.05.).
Table 4. Bio-concentration factor for potato (dry weight)/soil system.
Table 4. Bio-concentration factor for potato (dry weight)/soil system.
ContentsZnCuPbAsCrNi
Range0.010–2260.024–0.207<0.001–0.009<0.001<0.001–0.0320.001–0.024
Median0.0710.0750.002<0.0010.0010.005
Mean0.0870.0880.003<0.0010.0030.007
GroupNumber9108--221
Range0.010–0.045 a0.024–0.046 a<0.001 a--<0.001 a0.001–0.004 a
Number262223--4826
Range0.052–0.082 b0.049–0.085 b0.001–0.002 b--0.001–0.004 b0.005–0.009 b
Number121520--25
Range0.088–0.128 c0.097–0.125 c0.003–0.005 c--0.007–0.016 c0.011–0.014 c
Number564--23
Range0.143–0.171 d0.139–0.173 d0.006–0.008 d--0.022–0.023 d0.017–0.020 d
Number431--21
Range0.192–0.226 e0.193–0.207 e0.009 e--0.028–0.032 e0.024 e
(abcde: Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant differences between groups, p < 0.05.).
Table 5. Pearson correlation between the heavy metal content in potatoes and the environmental parameters.
Table 5. Pearson correlation between the heavy metal content in potatoes and the environmental parameters.
EnvironmentHeavy Metals in Potatoes (mg kg−1)
ParametersZnCuPbAsCrNi
[Zn] soil0.2200.0550.231--0.155−0.048
[Cu] soil−0.082−0.031−0.070--0.213−0.127
[Pb] soil0.212−0.1630.109--−0.097−0.255
[As] soil0.1050.0850.301 *--0.182−0.088
[Cr] soil−0.033−0.1340.142--0.083−0.076
[Ni] soil0.0700.0020.108--0.039−0.071
pH−0.208−0.095−0.028--−0.344 **−0.591 **
OM0.208−0.117−0.037--−0.135−0.397
Elevation−0.292 *−0.444 **0.250--0.034−0.066
** = Significant at 0.01 levels; * = Significant at 0.05 levels
Table 6. Health risk index (HRI) and daily intake of metals (DIM mg/kg/day).
Table 6. Health risk index (HRI) and daily intake of metals (DIM mg/kg/day).
PlantHazard Quotient
PotatoMetalsZnCuPbAsCrNi
DIM5.81 × 10−31.44 × 10−35.79 × 10−5<2.1 × 10−51.54 × 10−41.18 × 10−4
RfD (mg kg−1 day−1)0.370.043.5 × 10−33 × 10−41.38 × 10−20.02
HRI1.57 × 10−23.59 × 10−21.65 × 10−2--1.12 × 10−25.92 × 10−2
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shi, X.; Lin, Q.; Deng, P.; Feng, T.; Zhang, Y. Assessment of Heavy Metal Uptake in Potatoes Cultivated in a Typical Karst Landform, Weining County, China. Foods 2022, 11, 2379. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11152379

AMA Style

Shi X, Lin Q, Deng P, Feng T, Zhang Y. Assessment of Heavy Metal Uptake in Potatoes Cultivated in a Typical Karst Landform, Weining County, China. Foods. 2022; 11(15):2379. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11152379

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shi, Xueqin, Qiao Lin, Pengyu Deng, Tianyou Feng, and Yuping Zhang. 2022. "Assessment of Heavy Metal Uptake in Potatoes Cultivated in a Typical Karst Landform, Weining County, China" Foods 11, no. 15: 2379. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11152379

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop