Next Article in Journal
Beyond Plagiarism: Scientific Ethics and Its Other Aspects
Previous Article in Journal
Library-Mediated Deposit: A Gift to Researchers or a Curse on Open Access? Reflections from the Case of Surrey
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessOpinion
Publications 2018, 6(2), 21; https://doi.org/10.3390/publications6020021

“As-You-Go” Instead of “After-the-Fact”: A Network Approach to Scholarly Communication and Evaluation

1
Mozilla Science Lab, Mountain View, CA, USA
2
Department of Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg University, 5037 AB Tilburg, The Netherlands
3
Department of Organization Studies, Tilburg University, 5037 AB Tilburg, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 28 January 2018 / Revised: 23 April 2018 / Accepted: 23 April 2018 / Published: 26 April 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Scholarly Communication—A Vision for Tomorrow)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [783 KB, uploaded 3 May 2018]   |  

Abstract

Scholarly research faces threats to its sustainability on multiple domains (access, incentives, reproducibility, inclusivity). We argue that “after-the-fact” research papers do not help and actually cause some of these threats because the chronology of the research cycle is lost in a research paper. We propose to give up the academic paper and propose a digitally native “as-you-go” alternative. In this design, modules of research outputs are communicated along the way and are directly linked to each other to form a network of outputs that can facilitate research evaluation. This embeds chronology in the design of scholarly communication and facilitates the recognition of more diverse outputs that go beyond the paper (e.g., code, materials). Moreover, using network analysis to investigate the relations between linked outputs could help align evaluation tools with evaluation questions. We illustrate how such a modular “as-you-go” design of scholarly communication could be structured and how network indicators could be computed to assist in the evaluation process, with specific use cases for funders, universities, and individual researchers. View Full-Text
Keywords: evaluation; network; communication; paper; metaresearch; decentralization; decentralisation; publishing evaluation; network; communication; paper; metaresearch; decentralization; decentralisation; publishing
Figures

Figure 1

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication (CC 0) License. (CC 0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Hartgerink, C.H.J.; van Zelst, M. “As-You-Go” Instead of “After-the-Fact”: A Network Approach to Scholarly Communication and Evaluation. Publications 2018, 6, 21.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Publications EISSN 2304-6775 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top