Next Article in Journal
Oral Microbiome and Dental Caries Development
Next Article in Special Issue
Learning Curve and Comparison of Dynamic Implant Placement Accuracy Using a Navigation System in Young Professionals
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Peripheral Osteoma of the Mandibular Condyle—Case Series
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Awareness and Attitudes of Dental Students toward Older Adults in Indonesia

by
Anton Rahardjo
1,
Fakhira Hanna Safira Firdaus
1,
Peter Andreas
1,
Yuniardini Septorini Wimardhani
2 and
Diah Ayu Maharani
1,*
1
Department of Preventive and Public Health Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia
2
Department of Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Dent. J. 2022, 10(10), 183; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj10100183
Submission received: 25 August 2022 / Revised: 23 September 2022 / Accepted: 26 September 2022 / Published: 29 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dentistry Journal: 10th Anniversary)

Abstract

:
In this study, we aimed to analyse the awareness and attitudes of dental students (DS) toward older adults (OAs) in Indonesia. Compromised oral health (OH) among OAs is a significant public health problem that is a global health burden. Furthermore, appropriate education can provide DS with information about strategic and efficient treatments for OAs. An online invitation was provided to every dental student in Indonesia in the third to sixth year of study to answer a web-based questionnaire as a part of a survey on awareness and attitudes (14 questions) towards OAs. From 1288 valid forms submitted, it was evident that most students (87%) expressed a positive attitude toward OAs. Female students showed a more positive attitude compared to males, with an odds ratio of 1.539 (p = 0.036), and students who had a connection to an older adult demonstrated a more positive attitude than those who did not (OR = 2.076; p < 0.001). The majority of the DS (98%) were conscious of the importance of geriatrics in dentistry, with female students showing more awareness than their male counterparts (OR = 2.553; p = 0.033). Positive awareness and attitudes must be accompanied by knowledge so that DS can offer appropriate and effective oral care to geriatric patients.

1. Introduction

The OA population is increasing globally; a population census in 2010 showed that Indonesia was among the top five countries in terms of the proportion of OAs, accounting for 13% of the global population [1,2]. Approximately 80% of OAs live in developing countries [2]. Even though the proportion of OAs in Indonesia is lower than in many developed countries, the absolute number is larger [2]. Evidence has shown that the aging of the population contributes to several changes in oral health problems and settings [3,4,5], and that the degree of dependency of the people in this age group can further influence these changes [6,7]. The World Health Organization has issued a “Call for Public Health Action” on the OH of OAs, as it is crucial for healthy aging and has been frequently neglected [8,9]. OH issues among OAs are increasing globally, which requires attention [10].
A previous study described that OAs in Indonesia had poor dental health and had low awareness of OH behaviours [11]. Most of them never visited a dentist, although needs for dental prostheses were apparent. Another study demonstrated that low body mass index was correlated with a poor oral hygiene index and rural residential characteristics among OAs in Indonesia [12]. The need to improve the OH status and OH behaviours of Indonesian elderly people was emphasized. Due to differences in OH problems and settings in this age group, to be able to provide dental treatment, dentists need reliable knowledge, attitudes, and skills [13].
Preparing DS for the changes in the dental treatment needs of OAs is an important part of the curriculum in geriatric dentistry [14]. In Indonesia, teaching related to geriatric dentistry is usually associated with modules in prosthodontics, oral medicine, and preventive dentistry. However, the topics have not been comprehensive and effective. The dental curriculum needs to focus more on education that emphasises the needs of the aging population and on preparing students with the proper cognitive, psychomotor, and affective training in understanding and addressing OA health issues and challenges [14,15]. Some studies have focused on health professionals and their negative attitude toward OAs; others, specific to dental graduates, revealed that they were not ready to provide dental care for OAs [15,16,17,18]. Globally, research has explored DS’ awareness, perceptions, and attitudes toward OAs, to gain information to promote the development of new strategies or models for geriatric dental education for each country [16,19,20,21,22].
Indonesia is the fourth largest country that has a steadily growing number of OA [1]. Despite this, of all the studies that have evaluated the awareness and attitudes of DS toward OAs around the world, Refs. [16,19,20,21,22] none of them have focused specifically on Indonesia. Therefore, this study aimed at assessing the awareness levels and attitudes of Indonesian DS toward OAs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

Currently, there are 32 dental schools in Indonesia. Two of them are new and, therefore, only had preclinical students. The inclusion criteria of the study respondents were that they all had to be registered dental students in year 3 to 6 from the 30 dental schools in Indonesia. No specific exclusion criteria were set. Estimation of DS who were aware of the importance of geriatrics in dentistry was 80% of the population. The margin of error for the estimate was set at 3%. With a two-sided 95% confidence interval, and an 80% estimated response rate, the required sample size was 1241 DS.

2.2. Procedures

The study was approved by the Institutional Research Ethics Committee at the Faculty of Dentistry in Universitas Indonesia (Protocol No. 090700719). Online informed consent was provided by all participants. The survey was sent to all DS at 30 universities in Indonesia, inviting them to participate in this cross-sectional analysis and to voluntarily complete a self-administered questionnaire survey. The questionnaire link was sent to the respective university coordinators, who in turn distributed and monitored the students as they filled the survey forms. A web-based questionnaire was used for its cost-effectiveness, minimal missing values, and higher data completeness rates compared to a paper and pen format.

2.3. Measures

A questionnaire was constructed using past research results [20,23] with some changes to suit the study purpose and population. A modified version of the questionnaire was employed based on previous studies to assess attitude [20] and awareness [23]. Nonetheless, knowledge of DS towards OAs was not explored. The actual questionnaire was translated from English to Bahasa Indonesia by an independent bilingual speaker (IBS). The draft was presented to an expert panel formed to assess the validity. The back-translation was conducted by a second IBS and was compared with the actual English version by the same expert member panel to ensure semantic equivalence. Following revisions based on the expert agreement, the face validity of the questionnaire was assessed among five different university students to obtain a clear picture of the clarity and comprehensiveness of the questionnaire. Cronbach’s alpha for the internal consistency was 0.70, which was considered acceptable.
The final questionnaire had a total of 24 questions that were divided into 3 components. The first component collected the participant’s demographic data, including sex (male/female), year of study (year 3–4/year 5–6), stage of study (preclinical/clinical), age (≤20/>21), type of university (public/private), area of university (Java/non-Java), currently living grandparents (yes/no), relationship with grandparents (yes/no/no because my grandmother and grandfather passed away), and connection with any other OAs (yes/no). The second component pertained to the dental student’s awareness of the importance of geriatrics in dentistry using “yes or no” dichotomous categorical responses. The last component collected information on the attitudes of the students toward OAs using 14-item statements with Likert scale responses comprising the following ranking options: 1 denoted “Strongly Disagree”, 2 for “Disagree”, 3 for “Neutral”, 4 for “Agree”, and 5 for “Strongly Agree”. Based on the mean score, the participants were rated to have a negative attitude (score 0–2.99), neutral attitude (score 3.00), or positive attitude (score 3.01–5.00). An analysis was conducted comparing positive attitude with negative and neutral attitude.

2.4. Analysis

IBM SPSS Statistics version 23.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data analysis. The data were initially analysed descriptively. Additionally, the chi-square test and logistic regression (LR) were conducted to analyse the comparison and relationship between students’ attitudes toward and awareness of OAs and factors, namely sex, year of study, stage of study, age, type of university, area of the university, currently living grandparents, close relationship with grandparents, and connections with any other OAs. The significance level and confidence interval (CI) were set at 0.05 and 95%, respectively.

3. Results

In total, 1288 valid questionnaires were collected, originating from the 30 dental schools in Indonesia that participated in our cross-sectional analysis. Table 1 presents the profiles of the students and the variables associated with awareness and attitudes toward OAs. Most of the students were female (n = 1073, 83.3%); in addition, the majority agreed to the importance of geriatrics in dentistry (n = 1264, 98.1%). Table 2 contains the statements on the attitudes that were asked of the students and the percentage of the responses. Table 3 displays the chi-square analysis between awareness of the DS of OAs and the selected factors. Through the LG, it was shown that sex was a significant factor related to awareness (Table 4). Overall, female DS were more highly aware of the elderly population than male DS with an OR of 2.553 (CI of 1.079–6.044; p = 0.033).
Table 5 describes the relationships between attitudes toward OAs and the independent variables. Sex, a close relationship with grandparents, and connection with any other OAs were found to be correlated with the attitudes of the DS. The results of the LG confirmed that sex and the presence of a connection with other OAs were significantly associated with the students’ attitudes (Table 6). The results of the LG confirmed that the female DS had a higher positive attitude toward OA than did male DS (OR = 1.539; 95% CI = 1.029–2.301; p = 0.036), and those who had a connection with other OA demonstrated a more positive attitude than those who did not have such a connection (OR = 2.076; 95% CI = 1.495–2.884; p < 0.001). Furthermore, no floor or ceiling effects were present, showing that it is unlikely that extreme items are missing in the lower or upper end of the scale, indicating sufficient sensitivity. Nonetheless, test-retest reliability was not conducted in this study.

4. Discussion

The strength of this study lies in the fact that it is the first study conducted to assess the awareness and attitudes of Indonesian DS toward OAs with a relatively large sample size. However, this study had some limitations. First, the study tried to include all the DS from all the schools in Indonesia; however, the response rates of the DS who were located outside Java were lower than those of the DS located on Java Island. The low response rate may cause selection bias, affecting the representativeness of the study for overall dental students in Indonesian. A connection with lecturers from schools outside Java to help inform students about this study might have increased the response rate. Second, another limitation of the study may be that the students who participated might be the ones who are interested in gerodontology; therefore, the interpretation of this study’s results should be considered with caution. Although individual variation always occurs and no measurement is perfectly accurate, the sample size of this study was relatively high, which might reduce any potential errors. Third, the cross-sectional design suggests association but cannot support causality. Future longitudinal studies are needed to follow reported awareness and attitudes of dental students toward older adults in Indonesia over time.
Almost all the DS who participated in this study were aware of the importance of geriatrics in dentistry. Sex influenced the awareness of the DS toward OAs, with female students being more aware than male students. This may be due to the greater social sensitivity of females. Groups with more females have exhibited a great sense of equality in conversation that enables the group members to have a healthy discussion among themselves, thereby making the best use of their knowledge and skills [16,24,25]. Moreover, our study revealed that sex was also associated with the attitude of the DS toward OAs. Female DS had a stronger positive attitude than male DS, which aligns with the results of reports from Iran and Brazil [19,20], although they seem to contrast with other studies conducted in the USA, Germany, and India [18,26,27]. Nonetheless, these results must be interpreted with caution due to potential bias. There were an unequal number of males and females. This unbalanced composition reflects the fact that the majority of DS in Indonesia are females [28,29].
The inculcation of optimistic attitudes toward OAs in DS may be vital for establishing a more positive professional behaviour and practice in dentistry [19,26]. It has been shown that personal experience and societal influence determine the positive attitudes toward OAs [27,30]. Furthermore, the development of empathy since childhood and during dental professional education may also influence the results of this study. The intensive clinical exposure of students, with proper guidance, and increased community visits and interaction with people, might bring about the necessary change in the attitudes of the students [27].
In addition, the findings of this study correspond with those of other studies, revealing that the DS who had a connection with other OAs had a more positive attitude toward this age group compared to those who did not [20,31,32] This may be related to increasing familiarity with the aging process and the physical features of old age due to exposure to OAs [20,32]. The behaviour and values of health care professionals can be affected by the conditions of their families or friends, which leads to greater positive attitudes [20,32].
More than 80% of the DS in the study disagreed with the statement that the treatment of older patients with a chronic illness was hopeless. Indeed, research has shown that chronic illness can be controlled through effective behavioural changes, appropriate medical management, and systematic monitoring, and chronic diseases and their consequences can often be prevented or managed effectively [33,34].
Our results also revealed that more than 60% of the DS agreed that they tended to pay higher attention to and sympathize with geriatric patients than those who are younger. This proportion was similar to the one found by a previous study in Iran [20]. In the present study, almost half of the DS responded neutrally to the statement that obtaining a medical history from OA patients is an ordeal. This may be the result of inadequate training and the experience of the students about the delivery of oral health care to OAs [35]. Effective and affordable strategies and programs should be designed to encourage public health care administration to provide better OH and quality of life (QOL) for OAs [8].
Additionally, more than 70% of the students agreed that as people age, they also become less organized and comparatively more confused. They know that aging is associated with physical, cognitive, and functional alterations, especially in patients with dementia, who rarely follow the recommendations of a dentist [35]. The awareness and attitudes of the DS toward the elderly population in Indonesia are positive. However, half of the participants in the current study would still prefer to see younger patients rather than older ones, which is a similar result to a previous study assessing the same issue in dentists [19]. This may be due to the lack of knowledge on how to treat OAs [15,36]. Although, the topic about the theory of the aging process, relation of aging to the condition of the oral cavity, oral problems related to older adults in terms of tooth loss and its treatment, and systemic conditions found in dental patients have been covered throughout the pre-clinical years of the dental curriculum. The assessment of students on these topics were done based on the semester of the pre-clinical years which covered the topics. Studies to clarify the possible factors that influence this attitude in practicing geriatric dentistry are needed.
The finding of the study may be related to the fact that the lack of further information and education may restrict the students from providing strategic and efficient treatments to OAs [37,38]. Thus, the development of a curriculum related to geriatric dentistry to improve positive attitudes and practices shall be provided to DS in Indonesia. A further implication of the result of this survey is that it was conducted with respondents at the undergraduate level. Training in outreach facilities and community settings may improve students’ competencies in managing older patients, including weak and dependent persons [36,38]. Moreover, opportunities to develop postgraduate gerodontology courses are warranted in Indonesia to address the importance of formal training in comprehensive OH care for OAs [39,40]. Continuing education and training opportunities in OH care for OAs that emphasizes interdisciplinary and interprofessional approaches should be increasingly offered. This is indispensable due to the ever-growing number of OAs in Indonesia.

5. Conclusions

The awareness and attitudes of Indonesian DS toward OAs have been explored and analysed. The findings of this study confirmed that the DS in Indonesia have a positive awareness and attitude toward OAs. This study showed that sex and the existence of a connection with OAs were significant predictors of increased awareness and positive attitudes among the DS in Indonesia. Female students and students who have a connection with OAs and are more exposed to the process of aging have a more positive attitude toward this population. The positive awareness and attitude found in DS need to be accompanied by knowledge so that DS can offer appropriate OH care to OAs in the future.

Author Contributions

D.A.M., Y.S.W. and P.A. supervised the study and contributed to the conception of the study. F.H.S.F. and A.R. contributed to the acquisition of data. D.A.M. and F.H.S.F. contributed to the statistical analysis and data interpretation. D.A.M. and Y.S.W. revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content and contributed to the drafting and finalizing of the manuscript. A.R. acted as a liaison to obtain ethical clearance. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by grants from Universitas Indonesia. Financial support included for the presentation of results.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical approval was granted by the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia. This research was conducted in full accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent Statement

The principal investigator was responsible for ensuring the confidentiality of the study documents and protecting the anonymity of all respondents. Written informed consent was provided by the participants.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data are available from the authors to any author who wishes to collaborate with us.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the funding support and for the participants in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. International Council on Management of Population Programmes. Ageing Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and Cambodia; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 2–112. [Google Scholar]
  2. Natl Inst Heal. Global Health and Aging; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2011; p. 11. [Google Scholar]
  3. Tonetti, M.S.; Bottenberg, P.; Conrads, G.; Eickholz, P.; Heasman, P.; Huysmans, M.; López, R.; Madianos, P.; Müller, F.; Needleman, I.; et al. Dental caries and periodontal diseases in the ageing population: Call to action to protect and enhance oral health and well-being as an essential component of healthy ageing—Consensus report of group 4 of the joint EFP/ORCA workshop on the boundaries between caries and periodontal diseases. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2017, 44 (Suppl. S18), S135–S144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Panchbhai, A.S. Oral health care needs in the dependant elderly in India. Indian J. Palliat. Care 2012, 18, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Slack-Smith, L.; Lange, A.; Paley, G.; O’Grady, M.; French, D.; Short, L. Oral health and access to dental care: A qualitative investigation among older people in the community. Gerodontology 2010, 27, 104–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. De Visschere, L.M.J.; van der Putten, G.J.; Vanobbergen, J.N.O.; Schols, J.M.G.A.; de Baat, C.; Dutch Association of Nursing Home Physicians. An oral health care guideline for institutionalised older people. Gerodontology 2011, 28, 307–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Delwel, S.; Binnekade, T.T.; Perez, R.S.G.M.; Hertogh, C.M.P.M.; Scherder, E.J.A.; Lobbezoo, F. Oral hygiene and oral health in older people with dementia: A comprehensive review with focus on oral soft tissues. Clin. Oral Investig. 2018, 22, 93–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Petersen, P.E.; Kandelman, D.; Arpin, S.; Ogawa, H. Global oral health of older people–Call for Public Health Action. Community Dent. Health 2010, 27 (Suppl. S2), 257–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. World Health Organization. World Report on Ageing and Health; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015; Available online: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/186463/1/9789240694811_eng.pdf (accessed on 21 December 2019).
  10. Petersen, P.E.; Yamamoto, T. Improving the oral health of older people: The approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme. Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol. 2005, 33, 81–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Adiatman, M.; Ueno, M.; Ohnuki, M.; Hakuta, C.; Shinada, K.; Kawaguchi, Y. Functional tooth units and nutritional status of older people in care homes in Indonesia. Gerodontology 2013, 30, 262–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hanindriyo, L.; Widita, E.; Widyaningrum, R.; Priyono, B.; Agustina, D. Residential characteristic on the association between oral hygiene and body mass index among elderly people in Indonesia. Gerodontology 2018, 35, 268–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kitagawa, N.; Sato, Y.; Komabayashi, T. Graduate and undergraduate geriatric dentistry education in a selected dental school in Japan. Eur. J. Dent. Educ. 2011, 15, 231–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Slack-Smith, L.M.; Hearn, L.; Wilson, D.F.; Wright, F. Geriatric dentistry, teaching and future directions. Aust. Dent. J. 2015, 60 (Suppl. S1), 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Marchini, L.; Ettinger, R.; Chen, X.; Kossioni, A.; Tan, H.; Tada, S.; Ikebe, K.; Dosumu, E.B.; Oginni, F.O.; Akeredolu, P.A.; et al. Geriatric dentistry education and context in a selection of countries in 5 continents. Spec. Care Dentist. 2018, 38, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. De Visschere, L.; van der Putten, G.J.; de Baat, C.; Schols, J.; Vanobbergen, J. The impact of undergraduate geriatric dental education on the attitudes of recently graduated dentists towards institutionalized elderly people. Eur. J. Dent. Educ. 2009, 13, 154–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shaikh, S.A.; Aldhuwayhi, S.; Joseph, A.M.; Kumari, V.V.; Khan, A.R.A.; Thakare, A.; Manva, M.Z.; Ustad, F.; Shaikh, S.; Mustafa, M.Z.; et al. Arabian undergraduates perceptions regarding barriers among the geriatric patients for failing to keep dental appointments: A cross-sectional study. J. Popul. Ther. Clin. Pharmacol. 2021, 28, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Anehosur, G.V.; Nadiger, R.K. Evaluation of understanding levels of Indian dental students’ knowledge and perceptions regarding older adults. Gerodontology 2012, 29, e1215–e1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Moreira, A.N.; Rocha, E.S.; Popoff, D.A.V.; Vilaça, E.L.; Castilho, L.S.; de Magalhães, C.S. Knowledge and attitudes of dentists regarding ageing and the elderly. Gerodontology 2012, 29, e624–e631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hatami, B.; Ahmady, A.E.; Khoshnevisan, M.H.; Lando, H.A. Senior dental student’s attitudes toward older adults and knowledge of geriatric dental care in the Islamic Republic of Iran. East. Mediterr. Health J. 2014, 19 (Suppl. S3), S172–S177. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Fabiano, J.A.; Waldrop, D.P.; Nochajski, T.H.; Davis, E.L.; Goldberg, L.J. Understanding dental students’ knowledge and perceptions of older people: Toward a new model of geriatric dental education. J. Dent. Educ. 2005, 69, 419–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Gupta, S.; Kamarthi, N.; Keswani, T.; Venkatraman, S.; Goel, S.; Goel, S. Assessment of the attitude of undergraduate dental students toward the geriatric population. Trop. J. Med. Res. 2014, 17, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Maharani, D.A.; Ariella, S.; Syafaaturrachma, I.D.; Wardhany, I.I.; Bahar, A.; Zhang, S.; Gao, S.S.; Chu, C.H.; Rahardjo, A. Attitude toward and awareness of medical-dental collaboration among medical and dental students in a university in Indonesia. BMC Oral Health 2019, 19, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Bear, J.B.; Woolley, A.W. The role of gender in team collaboration and performance. Interdiscip. Sci. Rev. 2011, 36, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Woolley, A.W.; Chabris, C.F.; Pentland, A.; Hashmi, N.; Malone, T.W. Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science 2010, 330, 686–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Nochajski, T.H.; Waldrop, D.P.; Davis, E.L.; Fabiano, J.A.; Goldberg, L.J. Factors that influence dental students’ attitudes about older adults. J. Dent. Educ. 2009, 73, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Nitschke, I.; Clarenbach-Tran, T.H.; Schlegel, D.; Reiber, T.; Sobotta, B.A.J. Attitudes of German undergraduate dental students towards the aged. Gerodontology 2015, 32, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Amir, L.R.; Tanti, I.; Maharani, D.A.; Wimardhani, Y.S.; Julia, V.; Sulijaya, B.; Puspitawati, R. Student perspective of classroom and distance learning during COVID-19 pandemic in the undergraduate dental study program Universitas Indonesia. BMC Med. Educ. 2020, 20, 392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Maharani, D.A.; Nadira, K.V.; Setiawati, F.; El Tantawi, M. Intention to provide tobacco cessation counseling among Indonesian dental students and association with the theory of planned behavior. BMC Oral Health 2021, 21, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lovell, M. Caring for the elderly: Changing perceptions and attitudes. J. Vasc. Nurs. 2006, 24, 22–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kim, J.H.; Son, G.R.; Algase, D.L. Attitudes toward the elderly among nursing students in Korea. J. Korean Acad. Nurs. 2004, 34, 1499–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Soliz, J.; Harwood, J. Shared family identity, age salience, and intergroup contact: Investigation of the grandparent–grandchild relationship. Commun. Monogr. 2006, 73, 87–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ciccone, M.M.; Aquilino, A.; Cortese, F.; Scicchitano, P.; Sassara, M.; Mola, E.; Rollo, R.; Caldarola, P.; Giorgino, F.; Pomo, V.; et al. Feasibility and effectiveness of a disease and care management model in the primary health care system for patients with heart failure and diabetes (Project Leonardo). Vasc. Health Risk Manag. 2010, 6, 297–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Alwan, A.; Maclean, D.R.; Riley, L.M.; Tursand’Espaignet, E.; Mathers, C.D.; Stevens, G.A.; Bettcher, D. Monitoring and surveillance of chronic non-communicable diseases: Progress and capacity in high-burden countries. Lancet 2010, 376, 1861–1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bots-Vantspijker, P.C.; Vanobbergen, J.N.O.; Schols, J.M.G.A.; Schaub, R.M.H.; Bots, C.P.; de Baat, C. Barriers of delivering oral health care to older people experienced by dentists: A systematic literature review. Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol. 2014, 42, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kossioni, A.; Vanobbergen, J.; Newton, J.; Müller, F.; Heath, R. European College of Gerodontology: Undergraduate curriculum guidelines in gerodontology. Gerodontology 2009, 26, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Cowpe, J.; Plasschaert, A.; Harzer, W.; Vinkka-Puhakka, H.; Walmsley, A.D. Profile and competences for the graduating European dentist—Update 2009. Eur. J. Dent. Educ. 2010, 14, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Patil, P.G.; Ueda, T.; Sakurai, K. Influence of early clinical exposure for undergraduate students on self-perception of different aspects of geriatric dental care: Pilot study between two colleges from Japan and India. J. Indian Prosthodont. Soc. 2016, 16, 288–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Madunic, D.; Gavic, L.; Kovacic, I.; Vidovic, N.; Vladislavic, J.; Tadin, A. Dentists' opinions in providing oral healthcare to elderly people: A questionnaire-based online cross-sectional survey. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tahani, B.; Manesh, S.S. Knowledge, attitude and practice of dentists toward providing care to the geriatric patients. BMC Geriatr. 2021, 21, 399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Profiles of the students and the variables associated with awareness and attitudes toward older adults (n = 1288).
Table 1. Profiles of the students and the variables associated with awareness and attitudes toward older adults (n = 1288).
VariablesN (%)
Demographic information
Sex
 Female1073 (83.3%)
 Male215 (16.7%)
Year of study
 Year 3–4629 (48.8%)
 Year 5–6659 (51.2%)
Stage of study
 Preclinical681 (52.9%)
 Clinical607 (47.1%)
Age, year
 ≤20349 (27.1%)
 >21939 (72.9%)
Type of university
 Public University831 (64.5%)
 Private University457 (35.5%)
Area of university
 Java648 (50.3%)
 Non-Java640 (49.7%)
Connection with older adults
Have grandparents who are currently alive
 Yes936 (72.7%)
 No352 (27.3%)
Have a close relationship with grandparents
 Yes924 (71.7%)
 No97 (7.5%)
 No, because my grandmother and grandfather passed away267 (20.7%)
Have a connection with any other older adults
 Yes747 (58%)
 No541 (42%)
Awareness
Do you realize the importance of geriatrics in dentistry?
 Yes1264 (98.1%)
 No24 (1.9%)
Attitude
 Positive1119 (86.9%)
 Neutral62 (4.8%)
 Negative107 (8.3%)
Table 2. The percentage of dental students’ agreement with the statements given on attitudes toward older adults.
Table 2. The percentage of dental students’ agreement with the statements given on attitudes toward older adults.
StatementsAgreementNeutralDisagreement
Most old people are pleasant to be with.46.051.22.8
It is society’s responsibility to provide care for its elderly persons.87.510.52.0
Old people in general do not contribute much to society.11.435.253.4
In general, old people act too slowly for modern society.24.343.432.3
It is interesting listening to old people’s accounts of their past experiences.82.814.23.0
The government should prioritize allocating money other than to geriatrics.84.513.42.1
Medical care for old people uses up too many human and material resources.15.643.241.2
Old people do not contribute their fair share towards paying for their health care.5.132.362.6
If I have the choice, I would rather see younger patients than elderly ones.21.857.021.2
As people grow older, they become less organized and more confused.74.519.36.2
Elderly patients tend to be more appreciative of the medical care I provide than younger patients.52.738.88.5
Taking a medical history from elderly patients is frequently an ordeal.14.946.039.1
I tend to pay more attention and have more sympathy towards my elderly patients than my younger patients.64.629.55.9
Treatment of chronically ill old patients is hopeless.3.011.885.2
Table 3. Variables related to the dental students’ awareness of older adults.
Table 3. Variables related to the dental students’ awareness of older adults.
VariableAwarenessp-Value
Demographic information
Sex 0.027 *
 Female1057 (98.5%)
 Male207 (96.3%)
Year of study 0.478
 Year 3–4619 (98.4%)
 Year 5–6645 (97.9%)
Stage of study 0.366
 Preclinical671 (98.5%)
 Clinical593 (97.7%)
Age, year 0.816
 ≤20343 (98.3%)
 >21921 (98.1%)
Type of university 0.514
 Public University814 (98%)
 Private University450 (98.5%)
Area of university 0.703
 Java635 (98%)
 Non-Java629 (98.3%)
Connection with older adults
Have grandparents who are currently alive 0.040 *
 Yes923 (98.6%)
 No341 (96.9%)
Have a close relationship with grandparents 0.810
 Yes906 (98.1%)
 No96 (99%)
Have a connection with any other older adults 0.652
 Yes732 (98%)
 No532 (98.3%)
Chi-square test: * p < 0.05.
Table 4. Variables related to the dental students’ awareness of older adults.
Table 4. Variables related to the dental students’ awareness of older adults.
VariableOdds Ratio95% CIp-Value
Sex
 Female2.5531.079–6.0440.033
 Male *
 Constant25.875 <0.001
Logistic regression: CI = Confidence interval, * Reference category.
Table 5. Variables related to the dental students’ attitudes toward older adults.
Table 5. Variables related to the dental students’ attitudes toward older adults.
VariablePositive Attitude
n (%)
p-Value
Demographic information
Sex 0.047 *
 Female941 (87.7%)
 Male178 (82.8%)
Year of study 0.055
 Year 3–4537 (85.4%)
 Year 5–6582 (88.3%)
Stage of study 0.154
 Preclinical584 (85.8%)
 Clinical535 (88.1%)
Age, year 0.170
 ≤20300 (86%)
 >21819 (87.2%)
Type of university 0.262
 Public University728 (87.6%)
 Private University391 (85.6%)
Area of university 0.087
 Java572 (88.3%)
 Non-Java547 (85.5%)
Connection with older adults
Have grandparents who are currently alive 0.992
 Yes813 (86.9%)
 No306 (86.9%)
Have a close relationship with grandparents 0.043 *
 Yes815 (88.2%)
 No77 (79.4%)
Have a connection with any other older adults 0.001 *
 Yes675 (90.4%)
 No444 (82.1%)
Awareness
Do you realize the importance of geriatrics in dentistry? 0.567
 Yes1098 (86.9%)
 No21 (87.5%)
Chi-square test: * p < 0.05.
Table 6. Variables related to the dental students’ attitudes toward older adults.
Table 6. Variables related to the dental students’ attitudes toward older adults.
VariableOdds Ratio95% CIp-Value
Sex
 Female1.5391.029–2.3010.036
 Male *
Have a connection with any other older adults
 Yes2.0761.495–2.884<0.001
 No *
Constant3.203 <0.001
Logistic regression: CI = Confidence interval, * Reference category.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rahardjo, A.; Firdaus, F.H.S.; Andreas, P.; Wimardhani, Y.S.; Maharani, D.A. Awareness and Attitudes of Dental Students toward Older Adults in Indonesia. Dent. J. 2022, 10, 183. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj10100183

AMA Style

Rahardjo A, Firdaus FHS, Andreas P, Wimardhani YS, Maharani DA. Awareness and Attitudes of Dental Students toward Older Adults in Indonesia. Dentistry Journal. 2022; 10(10):183. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj10100183

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rahardjo, Anton, Fakhira Hanna Safira Firdaus, Peter Andreas, Yuniardini Septorini Wimardhani, and Diah Ayu Maharani. 2022. "Awareness and Attitudes of Dental Students toward Older Adults in Indonesia" Dentistry Journal 10, no. 10: 183. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj10100183

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop