<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
 xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
 xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/basic/2.0/"
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/rss/journal/dentistry">
		<title>Dentistry Journal</title>
		<link>http://www.mdpi.com/journal/dentistry</link>
		<description>Latest open access articles published in Dent. J. at http://www.mdpi.com/journal/dentistry</description>
								<items>
			<rdf:Seq>
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/1/2/12" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/1/1/3" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/1/1/1" />
                    	</rdf:Seq>
		</items>
				<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
	</channel>

        <item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/1/2/12">
	<title><![CDATA[Dent.  J., Vol. 1, Pages 12-18: Subjective Oral Health in Dutch Adults]]></title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/1/2/12</link>
	<description>Aim: To determine whether the subjective oral health (SOH) of the Dutch adult population was associated with clinical and demographic variables. Methods: A clinical examination was conducted in a sample of 1,018 people from the Dutch city of  ‘s-Hertogenbosch. SOH was measured using the Dutch translation of the short form of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-NL14). Results: The average score on the OHIP-NL14 was 2.8 ± 5.9 and 51% of the respondents had a score of 0. Dental status was the most important predictor of SOH. Conclusions:  The SOH in the Dutch adult population was much better than in groups of adults in Australia, the United Kingdom and New Zealand. Nevertheless, there were important variations in SOH related to dental and  socio-economic status.</description>

	<prism:publicationName>Dentistry Journal</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2013-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>2</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:doi>10.3390/dj1020012</prism:doi>
	<prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>18</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2304-6767</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title><![CDATA[Subjective Oral Health in Dutch Adults]]></dc:title>
    <dc:date>2013-05-06</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/dj1020012</dc:identifier>
    	<dc:creator>Gijsbert Verrips</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Annemarie Schuller</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/1/1/3">
	<title><![CDATA[Dent.  J., Vol. 1, Pages 3-11: Color Parameters of the Chromascop Shade Guide]]></title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/1/1/3</link>
	<description>The purposes of this study are: (1) determine the color of the twenty shades in the Ivoclar’s Chromascop shade guide, (2) determine the color representation of the shade guide described as coverage error (CE), and (3) compare this shade guide with the Vita Classical and Bioform shade guides. The spectral data was collected using Beckman model DU reflectance spectrophotometer equipped with an integrating sphere. Commission International de l’Eclairage (CIE) chromaticity coordinates were calculated using CIE illuminant C and 1931 observer data, then converted to CIE L*a*b* and Munsell notation. Each shade was spectrophotometrically compared to the published colors of 335 human teeth. The minimum CIE L*a*b* color difference was calculated for each tooth and the average of these color differences was defined as the CE. The measured colors of the Chromascop guide had a CIE L* range of 79.67 to 65.61, an a* range of -0.71 to 3.85, and a b* range of 14.58 to 27.69. The average CE of the Chromascop shade guide was 3.38. The Chromascop shade guide has similar colors and a CE compared with the Bioform and Vita Classical shade guides, but with some shades of higher red and yellow components.</description>

	<prism:publicationName>Dentistry Journal</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2012-12-21</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:doi>10.3390/dj1010003</prism:doi>
	<prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>11</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2304-6767</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title><![CDATA[Color Parameters of the Chromascop Shade Guide]]></dc:title>
    <dc:date>2012-12-21</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/dj1010003</dc:identifier>
    	<dc:creator>William O&#039;Brien</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Won-Suk Oh</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Peter Piché</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/1/1/1">
	<title><![CDATA[Dent.  J., Vol. 1, Pages 1-2: 
Dentistry ― At the Heart of Conflict between Medicine and Technology]]></title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/1/1/1</link>
	<description>As the first Editor-in-Chief of Dentistry Journal, I would like to provide a few comments about this field of research and practice. Evolved from a purely technical profession, dentists are nowadays exposed to a variety of different challenges. [...]</description>

	<prism:publicationName>Dentistry Journal</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2012-06-19</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
	<prism:doi>10.3390/dj1010001</prism:doi>
	<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>2</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2304-6767</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title><![CDATA[
Dentistry ― At the Heart of Conflict between Medicine and Technology]]></dc:title>
    <dc:date>2012-06-19</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/dj1010001</dc:identifier>
    	<dc:creator>Claude Jaquiery</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
    
<cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">
	<cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
	<cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
	<cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
</cc:License>

</rdf:RDF>
