Next Article in Journal
Special Issue: Advances of Peptide Engineering
Next Article in Special Issue
Carbon Black Replacement in Natural Rubber Composites Using Dry-Milled Calcium Carbonate, Soy Protein, and Biochar
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis of a Benzothiadiazole-Based D−A Molecule with Aggregation-Induced Emission and Controlled Assembly Properties
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis, Characterization and Ecotoxicity Evaluation of Biochar-Derived Carbon Dots from Spruce Tree, Purple Moor-Grass and African Oil Palm

by
Kaory Barrientos
1,*,
Maria I. Gaviria
2,
Juan Pablo Arango
1,
Jersson Placido
3,4,
Sandra Bustamante
3,4,5,
Martha E. Londoño
1 and
Marisol Jaramillo
1
1
GIBEC Research Group, Life Sciences Faculty, Universidad EIA, Calle 25 Sur #42-73, Medellín 055420, Colombia
2
GDCON Research Group, Engineering Faculty, Universidad de Antioquia, Calle 67 No. 53-108, Medellín 050010, Colombia
3
Institute of Life Science, Swansea University Medical School, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, Wales, UK
4
VEDAS Corporación de Investigación e Innovación (VEDAS CII), Cl 8 B 65-261, Medellín 050024, Colombia
5
Centre for NanoHealth, Department of Physics, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, Wales, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2021, 9(7), 1095; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9071095
Submission received: 27 May 2021 / Revised: 10 June 2021 / Accepted: 10 June 2021 / Published: 24 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biochar Production and Applications for Clean Industry)

Abstract

:
Biochar-derived C-Dots from Picea, Molinia caerulea and Elaeis guineensis were synthesized through a hydrothermal process, and their physicochemical and optical characteristics and environmental effects were compared. These C-Dots were characterized by techniques such as Attenuated Total Reflection–Fourier Transform Infrared (ATR-FTIR), UV-Vis spectrophotometry, fluorescence spectroscopy, dynamic light scattering (DLS), Z potential, and High-Resolution Transmission Electronical Microscopy (HR-TEM). The ecotoxicity tests were performed using the Microtox™ test, making this study one of the few that use this method. The C-Dots from Molinia caerulea showed the best quantum yield (QY) of 8.39% and moderate ecotoxicity, while Elaeis guineensis has the lowest QY (2.31%) but with zero toxicity. Furthermore, the C-Dots from Picea presents good optical properties but showed high toxicity and limits its use. Finally, all C-Dots showed functional groups that could be biofunctionalized with biomolecules, especially C-Dots from Molinia caerulea and Elaeis guineensis show potential for use in the development of optical biosensors.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Non-pollutant energy access is one of the sustainable development goals defined by the United Nations (UN) to achieve sustainability by 2030 [1], so many research efforts have been focused mainly on the use of plant biomass for energy and biofuels production from high temperature deconstructive methods such as pyrolysis, gasification, and thermal liquefaction [2,3,4,5]. Pyrolysis is a method with complete absence of oxygen and process temperatures around 300–700 °C. The three main products from pyrolysis are synthesis gas (syngas), bio-oils, and biochar [6]. Syngas and bio-oils are widely used for electricity, heat, and biofuel production while biochar is used in bioremediation and amendments processes in soils [6,7,8]. However, the use of biochar is limited due to the variability of the physicochemical properties that depend on the original biomass and the thermal process conditions. Therefore, alternatives for the use of biochar are necessary for the integral sustainability of the pyrolysis process and to close biological cycles following circular economy principles [9,10].
Biochar from the pyrolysis process usually exhibits a porous and semi-crystalline structure with a large surface area. This kind of structure maintains the surface chemical groups (aromatics and negative charge groups), the mineral compounds and give it biological resistance [11,12]. Those characteristics make the biochar a good precursor for more add-value carbonaceous materials, like C-Dots [12,13,14]. Recently, the interest on synthesis strategies for nanomaterials is growing, using waste biomass and biochar [15,16,17,18].
Carbon dots (C-Dots) are quasi-spherical nanoparticles that are made mainly from carbon and oxygen, usually with sizes below 10 nm [19,20,21,22]. These nanomaterials have gained attention because of their excellent photoluminescence yields and high photostability, which make them comparable to traditional quantum dots, but less toxic for biological systems [19,23,24]. C-Dots are attractive for their application as fluorescent probes for bioimaging [25,26], drug delivery [27,28,29], and optical biosensors development for environmental [30,31], agroindustry [32,33], and public health [34,35,36,37], with detection limits on nM order [38,39,40]. The obtention of different types of C-Dots depends on the original feedstock, the physicochemical characteristics of the feedstock, synthesis conditions [23] and the doping with heteroatoms and surface modifications [41]. Therefore, the characterization of the feedstock and the synthesized C-Dots is necessary. Currently, C-Dots synthesis includes methods like laser ablation, arc discharge, solvothermal oxidation, hydrothermal treatment, and microwave irradiation. Combining some of these methods like hydrothermal treatment with natural sources or waste materials, like biochar, becomes an excellent strategy for cost reduction, continuous precursor supply and the obtention of low toxicity nanomaterials [16]. Biochar has been employed as a precursor for C-dots production by different authors and different feedstocks such as sugar cane bagasse [42], microalgae biomass [21], flowers waste, ornamentals plants and fruits [15,43].
Besides, the toxicity studies of nanomaterials like C-Dots are significant areas of research since there is a wide debate about the possible risks associated with the widespread use of nanomaterials [44,45]. These risks are correlated with their size, shape, and chemical characteristics that can interact with biological systems causing a blockage of some signaling routes [46]. Although the study of toxicology effect of C-dots related to human health is more widespread, the effects of these particles in the environment, especially in aquatic environments are less evaluated and are fundamental to determine the impact of these nanoparticles on water quality, and their effect on the biodiversity of aquatic ecosystems [47,48,49,50].
The aim of this article was to compare the physicochemical and optical characteristics and the environmental effects of biochar-derived C-Dots from three different feedstocks: spruce tree (Picea), purple moor-grass (Molinia caerulea), and African oil palm (Elaeis guineensis). The biochar from Picea and Molinia caerulea was donated by two welsh companies that produced biochar from two highly produced biomasses in Wales. However, the feedstock of Elaeis guineensis was selected because it was intended to use materials available in Colombia to be part of the bioeconomy process. Colombia is the fourth producer of palm oil in the world and the first in America, which makes it generate annually about 400,000 tons of waste (approximately 2% of world production), to which must be added value to contribute to the closing of cycles. The C-Dots were obtained through a hydrothermal method and their chemical structure, toxicity, and stability were characterized through different techniques like FTIR, UV-Vis, Fluorescence spectrophotometry, Z potential, DLS, TEM and ecotoxicity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents

Three types of biochar were evaluated in this research, purple moor grass-biochar (Molinia caerulea), spruce tree-biochar (Picea), and African oil palm-biochar (Elaeis guineensis). Purple moor grass-biochar was kindly donated by Henfron Farm (Elan Valley, LD6 5HE, UK) and it was prepared with an Exeter Biocharcoal Retort (Carbon Compost Ltd.; Exeter, UK) in pyrolysis mode and temperatures between 300 °C and 375 °C for 4 h. Spruce tree-biochar was kindly provided by Common Visions LTD (Swansea, Wales, UK). African oil palm-biochar was kindly donated by the “Grupo de Investigación de Energías Alternativas–Centro de Desarrollo Tecnológico del Carbón” research group (GEAB-CIDTEC) from the Universidad Popular del Cesar, UPC Colombia. African oil palm-biochar was prepared at the “Centro Corporación de Investigación de la Palma de Aceite–Cenipalma” and the process involves the pyrolysis of oil palm trunk using FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) technology and temperatures between 200 °C and 400 °C [51]. All biochar were conserved at room conditions until use. Ultrapure water system (Barnstead Smart2Pure, Thermo Scientific, Pittsburg, CA, USA) was used through all the experimental setting. Acetone and potassium permanganate (KMnO4) were bought from Merck Millipore (Burlington, VT, USA). All chemicals were analytical grade.

2.2. Biochar Characterization

African oil palm-biochar and purple moor grass-biochar were characterized by “Grupo interdisciplinario de estudios moleculares” research group (GIEM) from Universidad de Antioquia. The characterization process followed the guide given in the standards NTC 5167 for pH and ashes measurement, NTC 370 for total organic Nitrogen measurement and AOAC 98002 for sulfur measurement. Other characteristics of the oil pam-biochar and purple moor grass-biochar could be consulted in Supplementary Material. The identification of biochar functional groups was performed through Attenuated Total Reflection–Fourier Transform Infrared (ATR-FTIR) in a Perkin Elmer (Waltham, MA, USA) instrument between 3000 cm−1 and 650 cm−1 frequency range and 32 running scans at a resolution of 4 cm−1.

2.3. Synthesis of Biochar-Derived C-Dots

Biochar-derived C-Dots were synthesized using previously reported methods by Placido et al. [13,21] employing a hydrothermal method in presence of a strong oxidation reagent (KMnO4). First, the biochar was shattered into small pieces using a mortar and then passed through a 425 µm sieve (Woven Wire, Endecotts), the sieved biochar was used for the C-dots production. The depolymerization reaction was performed with 10 g of biochar mixed with a solution of KMnO4 10% (w/v) in a 500 mL Erlenmeyer flask. The depolymerization reaction was carried on an autoclave (SA-300H, Sturdy, Wilmington, DE, USA) at 121 °C and 15 psi for 60 min. After reaction, the biochar solutions were centrifuged (SL 8, Thermo Scientific) for 5 min at 1000 rpm to separate the liquid (supernatant) and solid phases (remaining biochar). The supernatant was filtered with a 0.22 µm syringe filter (Merck Millipore, Burlington, VT, USA). The filtered liquid was mixed with Acetone and centrifugated (SL 8, Thermo Scientific) again (1000 rpm, 5 min) until the production of two liquid phases. The upper liquid phase was withdrawn, and later roto evaporated (BM500, Yamato, Santa Clara, CA, USA) at 85 °C and 750 HPa. The Carbon-dots were purified by using overnight dialysis (3.5 KDa MWCO, Standard RC Dry Dialysis, Labs Spectra/PorTM 3) and freeze-dried (18LC-16WW-TS, Thermo Scientific) for 32 h. The newly synthesized C-Dots were kept in solid state at 4 °C until use.

2.4. Characterization of Biochar-Derived C-Dots

C-Dots were characterized by various spectroscopic and morphological techniques. The fluorescence emission and excitation spectra and the UV-Vis spectra were performed at C-Dots concentration of 500 ppm in a Varioskan Lux (Thermo scientific, SkanIt Software 4.1) on a 200 µL working volume microplates (Falcon™ non-treated black 96-well) and 20 °C with 1 nm optical step. The identification of C-Dots functional groups was performed through Attenuated Total Reflection–Fourier Transform Infrared (ATR-FTIR) in a Perkin Elmer instrument between 4000 cm−1 and 650 cm−1 frequency range and 32 running scans at a resolution of 4 cm−1. The stability of the synthesized C-Dots at a concentration of 1000 ppm was examined through Dynamic light scattering (DLS) and Z potential techniques on a Nanoplus-3. The measurement was performed using 0.2 μm filtered solutions in a B0631009 cell, with water as a dispersant (Refractive Index: 1.3328). The shape and size of the C-Dots were taken using High-Resolution Transmission Electronical Microscopy (HR-TEM) on a FEI-Tecnai F20 Super Twin TMP.

2.5. Quantum Yield Measurement

The quantum yield (QY) of the synthesized C-Dots was calculated through comparative method, using quinine sulfate in 0.5 M H2SO4 and based on previous reports [15,16]. The QY was calculated according to the following equation:
Y = Q Y r e f I s a m I r e f A r e f A s a m n s a m 2 n r e f 2
where suffix “ref” and “sam” refers to the standard reference and sample, respectively. “I” is the integrated fluorescent emission intensity, “n” is the refractive index of the solvent and “A” is the intensity of absorbance. All the measurements were done at maximum intensity.

2.6. Ecotoxicity Assay

The C-Dots aquatic toxicity was evaluated via an ecotoxicity assay performed on a Microtox™ Model 500 Analyzer. The Microtox™ test is based on the measurement of Vibrio fischeri bioluminescence changes which correspond to cell viability, specifically the toxicity is related to fluorescence inhibition of the bacteria [52]. An 81.9% Basic Test with 9 double dilutions was applied, starting from the concentration of 1000 ppm for all the C-Dots samples. The results were calculated, taking into account the Gamma function after 5 and 15 min, and were reported as EC50, that is, the concentration that causes the 50% inhibition of the fluorescence of the microorganism [53]. Gamma [54] as:
Gamma = I c I t 1
where I c is the average light reading of filtrates of the control solutions and I t is the light reading of a filtrate of a particular concentration of the test material.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Biochar Characterization

The characteristics of the three types of biochar are shown in Table 1. All materials have alkaline pH, a characteristic attributed to the thermal decomposition of hydroxyl bonds and other weak bonds within the biochar structure produced under medium to high temperatures of synthesis [55]. The biochars exhibited variable nitrogen (N) and sulfur (S) content, which is related to the initial content of the source and the temperature of the synthesis process. It has been reported that with increasing temperatures, more N and S were lost in the material [56,57]. The loss of N in the biochars was attributed to the removal of N via volatilization at relatively low temperatures (~200 °C) [57]. Some works suggest that the pyrolysis temperature is an important factor that influences the speciation of sulfur in the biochar, since there is a much higher fraction of sulfur in organosulfur form for biochar produced at high temperatures, while the biochars at lower temperatures have sulfate, organosulfur, and sulfide [56,58].
Among the analyzed materials, Molinia’s biochar has the highest organic nitrogen content, while the biochar of Molinia caerulea and Elaeis guineensis have the highest sulfur content. Nitrogen values for biochar from Picea and Elaeis guineensis are comparable with those reported for biochar obtained from dairy manure [60], hardwood [61], eucalypt [62], willow [63,64,65], and bagasse from 14 agriculture waste [66]. The three materials reported in this study stand out for having a higher amount of sulfur than some of those reported in the literature [67].
The N and S content is important because these heteroatoms are associated with aromatic rings forming various functional groups on the biochar surfaces [55,68], which influences the properties of the material and its different applications [67,69]. Specifically, in the production of C-Dots from biochar, the N and S heteroatoms can be manipulated to act as electron donors or acceptors, and this process affects the characteristics and optical properties of the C-Dots that are obtained [70].
For the determination of the presence of functional groups on the biochar surface and the C-Dots, the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was used. The biochars FTIR spectrum of biochar derived from Picea, Molinia caerulea and Elaeis guineensis (Figure 1) doesn’t show peaks with high intensities, which is supported by several authors [71,72,73,74], and it’s due to the pyrolysis process, which is performed in biomass to produce biochar, because it promotes the rupture of several functional groups and the progressive carbonization of the material. However, all the spectra showed similar peaks at 744, 813, 877, 1574, and 1700 cm−1.
The peaks at 744, 813, and 877 cm−1 are associated with the carbon linkages, more specifically C–H bending, and the peaks at 1574 and 1700 cm−1 are associated with carboxyl groups. Besides, the Molinia caerulea and Elaeis guineensis biochar shows a C–O group (1111 cm−1) that corresponds to a secondary alcohol, while the Picea biochar shows the C–O group (1196 cm−1) associated with a tertiary alcohol. These groups are mostly found in biochar that are obtained from sources that tend to be polar, hydrophilic, and relatively reactive, such as lignocellulosic feedstocks. Furthermore, the oxygen-containing functional groups have variable charge, at a higher pH, the carboxylic acids give up protons and become negatively charged (–COO) [71,75,76].
The spectra of Molinia cerulea and Elaeis guineensis show peaks at 2000 and 2100 cm−1, corresponding to triple bond of alkynes that are part of the lignocellulose [77,78,79]. Finally, only the biochar of Elaeis guineensis show the presence of asymmetric (2910 cm−1) and symmetric (2850 cm−1) C–H stretching bands associated with aliphatic functional groups, which decrease in intensity due to structural changes occurred during pyrolysis that produce a decrease in aliphatic compounds [80,81]. The spectra obtained from the biochar of Picea, Molinia caerule and Elaeis guineensis, don’t show high intensities due to the carbonization processes to which the biomass is subjected. In addition, the functional groups are related to lignocellulosic feedstocks such as those used in this work. Finally, it is suggested that the differences found in the spectra may be due to the conditions of the thermal conversion process of biochar, since many authors [21,82] report that variables such as reactor type, heating rate, temperature, residence time, oxygen concentration, etc. are significant variables that can affect the characteristics of biochar produced.

3.2. Carbon Dots Characterization

3.2.1. Chemical Characterization

The FTIR spectra of the three biochar-derived C-Dots are depicted in Figure 2. These spectra, unlike those obtained for biochar, show an increase in the intensity of the bands and a change in their position, which suggests an increase in the amount (per unit volume) of some functional groups, and a change in the state of hybridization or electronic distribution of molecular bonds. Furthermore, the absence of the bands between 1700 and 2100 cm−1 suggests the formation of other functional groups due to the hydrothermal process with KMnO4.
The bands between 700 and 900 cm−1 shown in the spectra are associated with con C –H bending, as are the spectra of biochar. The existence of C–O–C bonds leads to the absorption peak at 990 cm−1 for Elaeis guineensis C-Dots and 1045 cm−1 for Picea and Molinia caerulea C-Dots [83,84], and the peak at 1236 cm−1 is associated with C–O stretching [85,86]. One of the most intense peaks of all the spectra occurs at 1370 cm−1 which corresponds to C–N [87,88,89]; the bands located around 1550–1750 cm−1 are assigned, for some authors to C=N [89,90], while other authors associated these bands with the stretching vibration of C=C and carbonyl bonds (C=O) [83,84,85,91]. Moreover, the band around 1700 cm−1 could indicate the vibration of the carbonyl bond of a carboxylic acid, however, because it’s weak, it could represent the deprotonation of the group and the apparition of the carboxylate group (COO) [20]. The presence of carbonyl groups could allow, in future works, the functionalization of these carbonaceous materials with molecules that have amine groups available through the carbodiimide technique.
Finally, the peaks displayed between 2850 cm−1 and 2950 cm−1 are from C–H stretching vibration [91,92,93], and the broad absorption band within 3100–3600 cm−1 derives from the stretching vibration of hydroxyl bonds (O–H) and N–H [83,84]. This data suggest that the C-Dots obtained from Picea, Molinia caerulea and Elaeis guineensis present large hydrophilic groups indicating the formation of water-soluble materials, and the presence of carbonyl moieties suggest that the C-Dots could be slightly negatively charged.

3.2.2. Morphology and Stability

The HR-TEM and the DLS were utilized to investigate the morphology and average size of the biochar-derived C-Dots. The size distribution obtained by measuring the hydrodynamic diameter of C-Dots (1000 ppm) derived from Picea, Molinia caerulea and Elaeis guineensis; by DLS indicates that these nanoparticles have a total hydrodynamic diameter of 113 ± 13.4, 122.7 ± 2, and 105.4 ± 7.1 nm and the polydispersity index are 0.19 ± 0.01, 0.18 ± 0.04, and 0.2 ± 0.03, respectively. Besides, the DLS graphs show that the three types of C-Dots are bimodal and have a second population of particles with hydrodynamic diameter less than 5 nm. However, HR-TEM images (Figure 3) reveal that the three types of the extracted biochar nanoparticles (Picea, Molinia caerulea and Elaeis guineensis) are mono-dispersed, and they have a nearly spherical shape with an average size of 4.2 ± 1.2, 6.2 ± 1.9 and 2.5 ± 0.7 nm, respectively (Figure 3) (the size distribution was determined with 100 particles, which are founded in various TEM images related to different zones in the sample). Besides, the HR-TEM images show some aggregation between the particles, which explains the total hydrodynamic diameter measured with DLS. It is comparable to other reported works [94,95,96]. C-Dots derived from Elaeis guineensis biochar are smaller than the other particles and the C-Dots derived from Molinia caerulea biochar have the greatest variability in size. However, since all the particles are in the range less than 10 nm, they are considered C-Dots.
The Z potential is an indicator of nanoparticles stability since it is a measure of the charge repulsion or attraction between the particles from its surface to the boundary of the diffuse layer. The measurements affording a value of –58.85 ± 7.7, −48.7 ± 1.2, and −56.2 ± 6.2 for C-Dots synthetized from Picea, Molinia caerulea and Elaeis guineensis, respectively. These values indicate that the nanoparticles have great stability.

3.2.3. Optical Properties

The fluorescence spectra (Figure 4) show the maximum emission wavelength (λem) at similar value: 430, 420, and 420 nm for Picea, Molinia caerulea and Elaeis guineensis, respectively. The maximum excitation wavelength is also similar, ranging from 300 nm to 320 nm. The optimal excitation and emission wavelength combination are shown as an insert of Figure 4. All the obtained C-Dots show a brownish yellow color under daylight, and blue emission under UV light.
Usually, C-Dots exhibit an excitation-dependent photoluminescence that are related to state defects [17]. This behavior is particular for Elaeis guineensis whose intensity decrease between 360 nm and 400 nm. In this range is also a red shift photoluminescence that could be explained by the surface oxidation degree as a theory for the fluorescence origin [23]. Some authors found these defects can trap excitons, and the radiation from the recombination of trapped excitons causes the red-shift emission [97,98,99]. The band gap between the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital and the highest occupied molecular orbital reduces with the increase of oxygen content on the C-dots surface, that is, red-shifted emission is derived from increasing surface oxidation degree [23,100]. For Picea and Molinia caerulea, there is no visible red shift phenomenon, and the emission peak is preserved for the different excitation wavelengths, just changing its intensity. This behavior could be explained by the surface functional groups as an alternative theory for the fluorescence origin [23]. According to that, surface states are correlated to surface functional groups, such as C=O and C=N. Those groups are present in all the C-dots (Figure 2) and were proved to be closely related to the fluorescence [101,102]. The functional groups can introduce new energy levels and further produce new electron transitions [23].
The UV-Vis spectra (Figure 5) were investigated at a concentration of 500 ppm. Picea and Molinia caerulea show the same behavior, a characteristic slight absorption signal at 244 nm, while Elaeis guineensis shows a slight absorption signal at 244 nm and a more visible signal at 280 nm. Absorption signals between 240 nm and 290 nm are attributed to the π–π* or n–π* transitions and suggest the presence of C=O, C=C, and C=N surface functional groups [103]. On the other hand, the signal at 244 nm could be attributed precisely to n–π* transitions and could explain the slightly blue shift in the fluorescence spectra of Picea and Molinia caerulea when they are exciting with longer wavelengths [16,104].
The Quantum Yields (QY) of the Picea, Molinia caerulea and Elaeis guineensis C-Dots were 5.44, 8.39, 2.31% respectively, using quinine sulfate (QY of 0.54 in 0.5 M H2SO4 [105]) as the reference. Table 2 shows the comparison of several biomass-derived C-Dots QYs and excitation wavelengths with the results obtained in this work. Moreover, for C-Dots derived from biomass using the hydrothermal method, the QYs can range from 2.3% to 21.7% depending mostly on its size, carbon precursor, and processing parameters [106,107,108]. It is suggested that the high quantum yield obtained for the C-Dots synthesized from Molinia caerulea, is because the biochar from this source is one with the highest nitrogen and sulfur content (Table 1), compared to Picea and Elaeis guineensis, which influence the production of C-Dots with heteroatoms and are related to the increase in fluorescence intensity and its quantum yield [109,110,111]. For instance, Zhu et al. [99], obtained C-Dots doped with nitrogen and synthesized from citric acid and ethylenediamine with a QY of 80%. Likewise, several authors have shown an increase in the QY of C-Dots through doping with nitrogen or sulfur heteroatoms [112,113,114,115,116,117].

3.2.4. Ecotoxicity

In the present work, the aquatic toxicity analysis was carried out because environmental applications of C-Dots are projected (detection of heavy metals, pesticides, and endocrine disruptors) but also to determine the toxic potential that this nanomaterial may have at the end of its life cycle, by encountering water sources and aquatic biota. The Microtox™ test results for the different C-Dots samples are shown in Figure 6. The gamma value equal to unity represents the EC50 in percentage value, which can be seen to be met and exceeded for very low values of Picea (2.35% with slightly erratic values) and higher values of Molinia caerulea (41.92%). In the case of Elaeis guineensis C-Dots, the unit value is not reached, and the projected slope implies that extremely high values would be necessary to cause any toxic effect (858.6%).
The different samples present EC50 values in concentration units, taken at 15 min of the test of 23.5 mg/L, 419.2 mg/L and 8586 mg/L for Picea, Molinia caerulea and Elaeis guineensis C-Dots respectively. According to these results, we can classify them as highly toxic (Picea C-Dots), moderately toxic (Molinia caerulea C-Dots) and non-toxic (Elaeis guineensis C-Dots) [123].
The toxicity of nanomaterials, in general, is a growing field of study, which includes initiatives like US NanoEPA [124] and EU NanoSafety cluster [125]. Toxicity depends on starting material, dose, size, surface chemistry, and durability; additionally, various routes of exposure are considered with different effects on organisms [126]. Picea C-Dots present a marked toxicity, which can be explained by the characteristic mentioned previously and their smaller size (Figure 3). Most studies focused on the safety of nanomaterials agree that size is the main factor of toxicity of nanomaterials with respect to the material on a macroscopic scale, mainly due to their effects through biological barriers, in the surface area and the density of absorption; this triggers endocytosis/exocytosis, oxidative stress, reactive oxygen species (ROS), cell damage and apoptosis [127].
C-Dots have a lower toxicity than quantum dots, traditionally synthesized from heavy metals [127]. However, ecotoxicological evaluations of C-Dots are scarce, despite being a priority test in terms of safety. Few studies have been carried out in bioindicator organisms such as microcrustaceans (Daphnia magna) and zebra fish (Danio rerio), showing that concentrations up to 200 mg/L can be cleared without acute toxic effects [128]. However, in the present work, it was found that Picea C-Dots are toxic for Vibrio fischeri at lower values. This shows that the Microtox™ assays are more sensitive [123] and that more data is needed at the ecotoxicological level to follow the in vivo testing process. The damage routes of C-Dots in these organisms are related to oxidative stress [128]. However, several authors agree that carbonaceous nanomaterials have little or no bioaccumulation capacity, so there would be no chronic toxicity [127]. Future work is required to further clarify these findings.

4. Conclusions

This work shows that Picea C-Dots have excellent optical properties. However, they exhibit high ecotoxicity, which limits their applications. Molinia caerulea and Elaeis guineensis C-Dots have low or no toxicity, but Elaeis guineensis C-Dots has the lowest fluorescence intensity with respect to the others. All the C-Dots have high values of negative Z potential, which indicate colloidal stability. Besides, they have excellent chemical groups on the surface that would allow for easy functionalization to other molecules, so they have the potential, especially Molinia caerulea and Elaeis guineensis C-Dots, for use in the development of optical biosensors with applications in the detection of environmental contaminants and pathogens. However, the optical properties (quantum yield) could be optimized to improve their performance. These results allow for the encouragement of the valorization of agro-industrial waste for its transformation into biochar and its use beyond soil amendment. Finally, future works could include more studies focused on the optimization of the optical properties of C-Dots, as well as the study of their ecotoxicology that allows a safe application of these nanomaterials in different fields of knowledge.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pr9071095/s1, Table S1: Physicochemical analysis of Molinia caerulea biochar, Table S2: Physicochemical analysis of Elaeis guineensis biochar.

Author Contributions

Devised and directed the project, M.J., M.E.L., S.B. and J.P.; designed the experiments and conceptualized the paper, K.B., M.I.G. and J.P.A.; synthetized the C-Dots, J.P., M.E.L., K.B., M.I.G. and J.P.A.; analyzed the biochar characterization data, M.I.G.; conducted the optical properties experiment and analysis, K.B. and M.I.G.; conducted the morphology and stability experiments and analysis, K.B.; analyzed the High-Resolution Transmission Electronical Microscopy data, M.E.L. and K.B.; conducted the Attenuated Total Reflection–Fourier Transform Infrared experiments and analysis, J.P.A. and K.B.; analyzed the Microtox™ data, M.I.G.; performed the Quantum Yield calculations, J.P.A.; wrote the manuscript in consultation, K.B., M.I.G., J.P.A., M.J., M.E.L., J.P. and S.B. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovation of the Colombian government (code 133380764415, contract number CT- 800-2018) (code 111571451059, contract number FP44842-147-2016).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information file.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovation of the Colombian government for financing the projects “Desarrollo de un inmunosensor basado en Carbon Dots para la detección de tuberculosis” (code 133380764415, contract number CT- 800-2018) and “Redes de biosensores aplicados a la detección de contaminantes tóxicos en fuentes naturales que abastecen a las plantas de potabilización” (code 111571451059, contract number FP44842-147-2016). The authors thank the Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovation of the Colombian government for the scholarship for doctoral studies of Maria Isabel Gaviria (Grant number 785 of 2017). Jersson Placido and Sandra Bustamante would like to thank the European Regional Development Fund/Welsh Government funded BEACON+ research program (Swansea University).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. United Nations. The Sustainable Development Goals Report; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2020; ISSN 2521-6899. [Google Scholar]
  2. Benedetti, V.; Patuzzi, F.; Baratieri, M. Characterization of char from biomass gasification and its similarities with activated carbon in adsorption applications. Appl. Energy 2018, 227, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yao, Z.; You, S.; Ge, T.; Wang, C.-H. Biomass gasification for syngas and biochar co-production: Energy application and economic evaluation. Appl. Energy 2018, 209, 43–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Vamvuka, D.; Sfakiotakis, S.; Pantelaki, O. Evaluation of gaseous and solid products from the pyrolysis of waste biomass blends for energetic and environmental applications. Fuel 2019, 236, 574–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kong, X.; Zhu, Y.; Lei, H.; Wang, C.; Zhao, Y.; Huo, E.; Lin, X.; Zhang, Q.; Qian, M.; Mateo, W.; et al. Synthesis of graphene-like carbon from biomass pyrolysis and its applications. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 399, 125808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, J.; Dai, J.; Liu, G.; Zhang, H.; Gao, Z.; Fu, J.; He, Y.; Huang, Y. Biochar from microwave pyrolysis of biomass: A review. Biomass Bioenergy 2016, 94, 228–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chen, T.; Liu, R.; Scott, N.R. Characterization of energy carriers obtained from the pyrolysis of white ash, switchgrass and corn stover—Biochar, syngas and bio-oil. Fuel Process. Technol. 2016, 142, 124–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Muegue, L.C.D.; González, J.C.A.; Mesa, G.P. Characterization and Potential Use of Biochar for the Remediation of Coal Mine Waste Containing Efflorescent Salts. Sustainability 2017, 9, 2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Giri, B.S.; Goswami, M.; Singh, R. Review on Application of Agro-Waste Biomass Biochar for Adsorption and Bioremediation Dye. Biomed. J. Sci. Tech. Res. 2017, 1, 1928–1930. [Google Scholar]
  10. Aresta, M.; Dibenedetto, A.; Angelini, A. Catalysis for the Valorization of Exhaust Carbon: From CO2 to Chemicals, Materials, and Fuels. Technological Use of CO2. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 1709–1742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shalini, S.S.; Palanivelu, K.; Ramachandran, A.; Raghavan, V. Biochar from biomass waste as a renewable carbon material for climate change mitigation in reducing greenhouse gas emissions—A review. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2020, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Tan, X.; Liu, S.-B.; Liu, Y.-G.; Gu, Y.-L.; Zeng, G.-M.; Hu, X.-J.; Wang, X.; Jiang, L.-H. Biochar as potential sustainable precursors for activated carbon production: Multiple applications in environmental protection and energy storage. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 227, 359–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Plácido, J.; Bustamante-López, S.; Meissner, K.; Kelly, D.; Kelly, S. NanoRefinery of carbonaceous nanomaterials: Complementing dairy manure gasification and their applications in cellular imaging and heavy metal sensing. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 689, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Plácido, J.; López, S.B.; Meissner, K.; Kelly, D.; Kelly, S. Multivariate analysis of biochar-derived carbonaceous nanomaterials for detection of heavy metal ions in aqueous systems. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 688, 751–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pourreza, N.; Ghomi, M. Green synthesized carbon quantum dots from Prosopis juliflora leaves as a dual off-on fluorescence probe for sensing mercury (II) and chemet drug. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 98, 887–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Atchudan, R.; Edison, T.N.J.I.; Perumal, S.; Selvam, N.C.S.; Lee, Y.R. Green synthesized multiple fluorescent nitrogen-doped carbon quantum dots as an efficient label-free optical nanoprobe for in vivo live-cell imaging. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2019, 372, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vasimalai, N.; Vilas-Boas, V.; Gallo, J.; Cerqueira, M.D.F.; Menéndez-Miranda, M.; Costa-Fernández, J.M.; Diéguez, L.; Espiña, B.; Fernández-Argüelles, M.T. Green synthesis of fluorescent carbon dots from spices for in vitro imaging and tumour cell growth inhibition. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2018, 9, 530–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kang, C.; Huang, Y.; Yang, H.; Yan, X.F.; Chen, Z.P. A Review of Carbon Dots Produced from Biomass Wastes. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 2316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Campuzano, S.; Yáñez-Sedeño, P.; Pingarrón, J.M. Carbon Dots and Graphene Quantum Dots in Electrochemical Biosensing. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Plácido, J.; Bustamante-López, S.; Meissner, K.; Kelly, D.; Kelly, S. Comparative study of the characteristics and fluorescent properties of three different biochar derived-carbonaceous nanomaterials for bioimaging and heavy metal ions sensing. Fuel Process. Technol. 2019, 196, 106163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Plácido, J.; Bustamante-López, S.; Meissner, K.; Kelly, D.; Kelly, S. Microalgae biochar-derived carbon dots and their application in heavy metal sensing in aqueous systems. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 656, 531–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Abdul, S.; Nor, R.; Zobir, M. Synthesis, Technology and Applications of Carbon Nanomaterials; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  23. Liu, M.L.; Bin Chen, B.; Li, C.M.; Huang, C.Z. Carbon dots: Synthesis, formation mechanism, fluorescence origin and sensing applications. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 449–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, R.; Lu, K.-Q.; Tang, Z.-R.; Xu, Y.-J. Recent progress in carbon quantum dots: Synthesis, properties and applications in photocatalysis. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 3717–3734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, W.; Li, C.; Ren, Y.; Sun, X.; Pan, W.; Li, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, W. Carbon dots: Surface engineering and applications. J. Mater. Chem. B 2016, 4, 5772–5788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zheng, M.; Liu, S.; Li, J.; Qu, D.; Zhao, H.; Guan, X.; Hu, X.; Xie, Z.; Jing, X.; Sun, Z. Integrating Oxaliplatin with Highly Luminescent Carbon Dots: An Unprecedented Theranostic Agent for Personalized Medicine. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 3554–3560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yuan, Y.; Guo, B.; Hao, L.; Liu, N.; Lin, Y.; Guo, W.; Li, X. Doxorubicin-loaded environmentally friendly carbon dots as a novel drug delivery system for nucleus targeted cancer therapy. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 2017, 159, 349–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. D’Souza, S.L.; Deshmukh, B.; Bhamore, J.R.; Rawat, K.A.; Lenka, N.; Kailasa, S.K. Synthesis of fluorescent nitrogen-doped carbon dots from dried shrimps for cell imaging and boldine drug delivery system. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 12169–12179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mehta, V.N.; Chettiar, S.S.; Bhamore, J.R.; Kailasa, S.K.; Patel, R.M. Green Synthetic Approach for Synthesis of Fluorescent Carbon Dots for Lisinopril Drug Delivery System and their Confirmations in the Cells. J. Fluoresc. 2017, 27, 111–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Wang, C.; Pan, C.; Wei, X.; Yang, F.; Wu, W.; Mao, L. Emissive carbon dots derived from natural liquid fuels and its biological sensing for copper ions. Talanta 2020, 208, 120375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Radhakrishnan, K.; Sivanesan, S.; Panneerselvam, P. Turn-On fluorescence sensor based detection of heavy metal ion using carbon dots@graphitic-carbon nitride nanocomposite probe. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2020, 389, 112204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Brachi, P. Synthesis of fluorescent carbon quantum dots (CQDs) through the mild thermal treatment of agro-industrial residues assisted by γ-alumina. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2020, 10, 1301–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Luo, X.; Han, Y.; Chen, X.; Tang, W.; Yue, T.; Li, Z. Carbon dots derived fluorescent nanosensors as versatile tools for food quality and safety assessment: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 95, 149–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bui, T.T.; Park, S.-Y. A carbon dot–hemoglobin complex-based biosensor for cholesterol detection. Green Chem. 2016, 18, 4245–4253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pirsaheb, M.; Mohammadi, S.; Salimi, A. Current advances of carbon dots based biosensors for tumor marker detection, cancer cells analysis and bioimaging. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2019, 115, 83–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chen, Z.-H.; Han, X.-Y.; Deng, L.-X.; Lin, Z.-Y.; Mu, F.-Y.; Zhang, S.; Shi, G.; Zhang, M. A self-calibrating logic system and oxidase-based biosensor using Tb3+-doped carbon dots/DNA conjugates. Talanta 2019, 191, 235–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Bhattacharyya, D.; Sarswat, P.K.; Free, M.L. Quantum dots and carbon dots based fluorescent sensors for TB biomarkers detection. Vacuum 2017, 146, 606–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. He, L.; Yang, Y.; Kim, J.; Yao, L.; Dong, X.; Li, T.; Piao, Y. Multi-layered enzyme coating on highly conductive magnetic biochar nanoparticles for bisphenol A sensing in water. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 384, 123276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, M.L.; Bin Chen, B.; He, J.H.; Li, C.M.; Li, Y.F.; Huang, C.Z. Anthrax biomarker: An ultrasensitive fluorescent ratiometry of dipicolinic acid by using terbium(III)-modified carbon dots. Talanta 2019, 191, 443–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Spanu, D.; Binda, G.; Dossi, C.; Monticelli, D. Biochar as an alternative sustainable platform for sensing applications: A review. Microchem. J. 2020, 159, 105506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, H.; Ding, J.; Zhang, K.; Ding, L. Construction of biomass carbon dots based fluorescence sensors and their applications in chemical and biological analysis. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2019, 118, 315–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Brachi, P. Synthesis of carbon dots (CDs) through the fluidized bed thermal treatment of residual biomass assisted by γ-alumina. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020, 263, 118361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pooja, D.; Singh, L.; Thakur, A.; Kumar, P. Green synthesis of glowing carbon dots from Carica papaya waste pulp and their application as a label-freechemo probe for chromium detection in water. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 283, 363–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hardman, R. A Toxicologic Review of Quantum Dots: Toxicity Depends on Physicochemical and Environmental Factors. Environ. Health Perspect. 2006, 114, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Oberdörster, G.; Oberdörster, E.; Oberdörster, J. Nanotoxicology: An Emerging Discipline Evolving from Studies of Ultrafine Particles. Environ. Health Perspect. 2005, 113, 823–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Chunying, C.; Haifang, W. Biomedical Applications and Toxicology of Carbon Nanomaterials; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  47. Wang, F.; Chen, P.; Feng, Y.; Xie, Z.; Liu, Y.; Su, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Yao, K.; Lv, W.; et al. Facile synthesis of N-doped carbon dots/g-C3N4 photocatalyst with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity for the degradation of indomethacin. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 207, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Farre, M.; Gajda-Schrantz, K.; Kantiani, L.; Barceló, D. Ecotoxicity and analysis of nanomaterials in the aquatic environment. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2008, 393, 81–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jahan, S.; Bin Yusoff, I.; Alias, Y.B.; Bin Abu Bakar, A.F. Reviews of the toxicity behavior of five potential engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) into the aquatic ecosystem. Toxicol. Rep. 2017, 4, 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Rana, S.; Kalaichelvan, P.T. Ecotoxicity of Nanoparticles. ISRN Toxicol. 2013, 2013, 574648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Díaz, L.C.; Pino, N.; Peñuela, G. Biochar from oil palm waste as an amendment for the remediation of soil disturbed by open-cast coal mining. Glob. Adv. Res. J. Eng. Technol. Innov. 2016, 5, 17–22. [Google Scholar]
  52. Erzinger, G.S.; Schmoeller, F.; Pinto, L.H.; Américo, L.; Hemmersbach, R.; Hauslage, J.; Häder, D.-P. Bioluminescence systems in environmental biosensors. In Bioassays; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 242–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Environmental Technology Centre. Biological Test Method: Reference Method for Determining the Toxicity of Sediment using Luminescent Bacteria in a Solid-Phase Test; Report EPS 1/RM/42; Environmental Technology Centre: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2002; ISBN 0-660-18911-9.
  54. ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials). Standard Guide for Conducting Sediment Toxicity Tests with Luminescent Bacteria; Draft No. 8; ASTM: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  55. Panahi, H.K.S.; Dehhaghi, M.; Ok, Y.S.; Nizami, A.-S.; Khoshnevisan, B.; Mussatto, S.I.; Aghbashlo, M.; Tabatabaei, M.; Lam, S.S. A comprehensive review of engineered biochar: Production, characteristics, and environmental applications. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 270, 122462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhao, B.; Xu, H.; Zhang, T.; Nan, X.; Ma, F. Effect of pyrolysis temperature on sulfur content, extractable fraction and release of sulfate in corn straw biochar. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 35611–35617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Zheng, H.; Wang, Z.; Deng, X.; Zhao, J.; Luo, Y.; Novak, J.; Herbert, S.; Xing, B. Characteristics and nutrient values of biochars produced from giant reed at different temperatures. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 130, 463–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Cheah, S.; Malone, S.C.; Feik, C.J. Speciation of Sulfur in Biochar Produced from Pyrolysis and Gasification of Oak and Corn Stover. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 8474–8480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Palviainen, M.; Berninger, F.; Bruckman, V.J.; Köster, K.; de Assumpção, C.R.M.; Aaltonen, H.; Makita, N.; Mishra, A.; Kulmala, L.; Adamczyk, B.; et al. Effects of biochar on carbon and nitrogen fluxes in boreal forest soil. Plant Soil 2018, 425, 71–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Cantrell, K.B.; Hunt, P.G.; Uchimiya, M.; Novak, J.M.; Ro, K. Impact of pyrolysis temperature and manure source on physicochemical characteristics of biochar. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 107, 419–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Nguyen, T.T.N.; Wallace, H.; Xu, C.-Y.; van Zwieten, L.; Weng, Z.H.; Xu, Z.; Che, R.; Tahmasbian, I.; Hu, H.-W.; Bai, S.H. The effects of short term, long term and reapplication of biochar on soil bacteria. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 636, 142–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Abujabhah, I.S.; Doyle, R.; Bound, S.A.; Bowman, J. The effect of biochar loading rates on soil fertility, soil biomass, potential nitrification, and soil community metabolic profiles in three different soils. J. Soils Sediments 2016, 16, 2211–2222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Agegnehu, G.; Nelson, P.; Bird, M.I. Crop yield, plant nutrient uptake and soil physicochemical properties under organic soil amendments and nitrogen fertilization on Nitisols. Soil Tillage Res. 2016, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Agegnehu, G.; Nelson, P.; Bird, M.I. The effects of biochar, compost and their mixture and nitrogen fertilizer on yield and nitrogen use efficiency of barley grown on a Nitisol in the highlands of Ethiopia. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 569, 869–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Agegnehu, G.; Bass, A.M.; Nelson, P.; Bird, M.I. Benefits of biochar, compost and biochar–compost for soil quality, maize yield and greenhouse gas emissions in a tropical agricultural soil. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 543, 295–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Prakongkep, N.; Gilkes, R.J.; Wiriyakitnateekul, W. Forms and solubility of plant nutrient elements in tropical plant waste biochars. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2015, 178, 732–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hossain, Z.; Bahar, M.; Sarkar, B.; Donne, S.W.; Ok, Y.S.; Palansooriya, K.N.; Kirkham, M.B.; Chowdhury, S.; Bolan, N. Biochar and its importance on nutrient dynamics in soil and plant. Biochar 2020, 2, 379–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Brennan, J.K.; Bandosz, T.J.; Thomson, K.T.; Gubbins, K.E. Water in porous carbons. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2001, 187, 539–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Liu, G.; Li, S.; Cheng, M.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, B.; Gao, Y.; Xu, Y.; Liu, F.; Lu, G. Facile synthesis of nitrogen and sulfur co-doped carbon dots for multiple sensing capacities: Alkaline fluorescence enhancement effect, temperature sensing, and selective detection of Fe3+ ions. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 13147–13156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Xu, Q.; Kuang, T.; Liu, Y.; Cai, L.; Peng, X.; Sreeprasad, T.S.; Zhao, P.; Yu, Z.; Li, N. Heteroatom-doped carbon dots: Synthesis, characterization, properties, photoluminescence mechanism and biological applications. J. Mater. Chem. B 2016, 4, 7204–7219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Suárez-Hernández, L.; Barrera-Zapata, R. Morphological and physicochemical characterization of biochar produced by gasification of selected forestry species. Rev. Fac. Ing. 2017, 26, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Shaaban, A.; Se, S.M.; Dimin, M.F.; Juoi, J.M.; Husin, M.H.M.; Mitan, N.M.M. Influence of heating temperature and holding time on biochars derived from rubber wood sawdust via slow pyrolysis. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis. 2014, 107, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Zhao, S.X.; Ta, N.; Wang, X.D. Effect of temperature on the structural and physicochemical properties of biochar with apple tree branches as feedstock material. Energies 2017, 10, 1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Gámiz, B.; Hall, K.; Spokas, K.A.; Cox, L. Understanding activation effects on low-temperature biochar for optimization of herbicide sorption. Agronomy 2019, 9, 588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Brewer, C.E. Biochar Characterization and Engineering. Ph.D. Thesis, Digital Repository, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Liu, Q.; Wang, S.; Zheng, Y.; Luo, Z.; Cen, K. Mechanism study of wood lignin pyrolysis by using TG-FTIR analysis. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis. 2008, 82, 170–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Yang, T.; Lua, A.C. Characteristics of activated carbons prepared from pistachio-nut shells by physical activation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2003, 267, 408–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Chemerys, V.; Baltrėnaitė, E. Influence of Intrinsic Properties of Lignocellulosic Feedstock on Adsorptive Properties of Biochar. J. Environ. Eng. 2018, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kołodyńska, D.; Bąk, J.; Kozioł, M.; Pylypchuk, L.V. Investigations of Heavy Metal Ion Sorption Using Nanocomposites of Iron-Modified Biochar. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2017, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Jouiad, M.; Al-Nofeli, N.; Khalifa, N.; Benyettou, F.; Yousef, L.F. Characteristics of slow pyrolysis biochars produced from rhodes grass and fronds of edible date palm. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis. 2015, 111, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Tang, Y.; Alam, M.S.; Konhauser, K.O.; Alessi, D.S.; Xu, S.; Tian, W.J.; Liu, Y. Influence of pyrolysis temperature on production of digested sludge biochar and its application for ammonium removal from municipal wastewater. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 209, 927–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zuo, P.; Lu, X.; Sun, Z.; Guo, Y.; He, H. A review on syntheses, properties, characterization and bioanalytical applications of fluorescent carbon dots. Microchim. Acta 2016, 183, 519–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Mei, S.; Wei, X.; Hu, Z.; Wei, C.; Su, D.; Yang, D.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, W.; Guo, R. Amphipathic carbon dots with solvent-dependent optical properties and sensing application. Opt. Mater. 2019, 89, 224–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wei, X.; Mei, S.; Yang, D.; Zhang, G.; Xie, F.; Zhang, W.; Guo, R. Surface States Induced Photoluminescence Enhancement of Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Dots via Post-Treatments. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2019, 14, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Chao, D.; Lyu, W.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, Q.; Deng, R.; Zhang, H. Solvent-dependent carbon dots and their applications in the detection of water in organic solvents. J. Mater. Chem. C 2018, 6, 7527–7532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zhang, L.; Liu, W.; Zhuang, H.; Zhang, J.; Chen, C.; Wang, Y.; Shan, S. Environmentally friendly synthesis of photoluminescent biochar dots from waste soy residues for rapid monitoring of potentially toxic elements. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 21653–21659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Prekodravac, J.; Vasiljević, B.; Marković, Z.; Jovanović, D.; Kleut, D.; Špitalský, Z.; Mičušik, M.; Danko, M.; Bajuk-Bogdanović, D.; Todorović-Marković, B. Green and facile microwave assisted synthesis of (metal-free) N-doped carbon quantum dots for catalytic applications. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 17006–17013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ju, J.; Zhang, R.; He, S.; Chen, W. Nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dots-based fluorescent probe for the sensitive turn-on detection of glutathione and its cellular imaging. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 52583–52589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Villanueva, F.Y.; Manioudakis, J.; Naccache, R.; Majewski, M.B. Carbon Dot-Sensitized Photoanodes for Visible Light-Driven Organic Transformations. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 2756–2765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Dastidar, D.G.; Mukherjee, P.; Ghosh, D.; Banerjee, D. Carbon quantum dots prepared from onion extract as fluorescence turn-on probes for selective estimation of Zn2+ in blood plasma. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2021, 611, 125781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Dager, A.; Uchida, T.; Maekawa, T.; Tachibana, M. Synthesis and characterization of Mono-disperse Carbon Quantum Dots from Fennel Seeds: Photoluminescence analysis using Machine Learning. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Ţucureanu, V.; Matei, A.; Avram, A.M. FTIR Spectroscopy for Carbon Family Study. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2016, 46, 502–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Kuo, T.R.; Sung, S.Y.; Hsu, C.W.; Chang, C.J.; Chiu, T.C.; Hu, C.C. One-pot green hydrothermal synthesis of fluorescent nitrogen-doped carbon nanodots for in vivo bioimaging. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2016, 408, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Pham-Truong, T.N.; Ranjan, C.; Randriamahazaka, H.; Ghilane, J. Nitrogen doped carbon dots embedded in poly(ionic liquid) as high efficient metal-free electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. Catal. Today 2019, 335, 381–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Mehta, V.N.; Jha, S.; Kumar, S. One-pot green synthesis of carbon dots by using Saccharum of fi cinarum juice for fl uorescent imaging of bacteria (Escherichia coli) and yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) cells. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2014, 38, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Thambiraj, S.; Shankaran, D.R. Green synthesis of highly fluorescent carbon quantum dots from sugarcane bagasse pulp. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 390, 435–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Liu, H.; He, Z.; Jiang, L.P.; Zhu, J.J. Microwave-assisted synthesis of wavelength-tunable photoluminescent carbon nanodots and their potential applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 4913–4920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Liu, M.L.; Yang, L.; Li, R.S.; Chen, B.B.; Liu, H.; Huang, C.Z. Large-scale simultaneous synthesis of highly photoluminescent green amorphous carbon nanodots and yellow crystalline graphene quantum dots at room temperature. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 3611–3617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Zhu, S.; Meng, Q.; Wang, L.; Zhang, J.; Song, Y.; Jin, H.; Zhang, K.; Sun, H.; Wang, H.; Yang, B. Highly photoluminescent carbon dots for multicolor patterning, sensors, and bioimaging. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 3953–3957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Shen, D.; Long, Y.; Wang, J.; Yu, Y.; Pi, J.; Yang, L.; Zheng, H. Tuning the fluorescence performance of carbon dots with a reduction pathway. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 5998–6003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Zhang, Y.; Yuan, R.; He, M.; Hu, G.; Jiang, J.; Xu, T.; Zhou, L.; Chen, W.; Xiang, W.; Liang, X. Multicolour nitrogen-doped carbon dots: Tunable photoluminescence and sandwich fluorescent glass-based light-emitting diodes. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 17849–17858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Wang, L.; Zhu, S.J.; Wang, H.Y.; Qu, S.N.; Zhang, Y.L.; Zhang, J.H.; Chen, Q.D.; Xu, H.L.; Han, W.; Yang, B.; et al. Common origin of green luminescence in carbon nanodots and graphene quantum dots. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 2541–2547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Moradi, S.; Sadrjavadi, K.; Farhadian, N.; Hosseinzadeh, L.; Shahlaei, M. Easy synthesis, characterization and cell cytotoxicity of green nano carbon dots using hydrothermal carbonization of Gum Tragacanth and chitosan bio-polymers for bioimaging. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 259, 284–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Zhang, Q.; Xie, S.; Yang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Wang, X.; Wu, J.; Zhang, L.; Chen, J.; Wang, Y. A facile synthesis of highly nitrogen-doped carbon dots for imaging and detection in biological samples. J. Anal. Methods Chem. 2018, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Zhang, J.; Yang, L.; Yuan, Y.; Jiang, J.; Yu, S.H. One-Pot Gram-Scale Synthesis of Nitrogen and Sulfur Embedded Organic Dots with Distinctive Fluorescence Behaviors in Free and Aggregated States. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 4367–4374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Chen, W.; Li, D.; Tian, L.; Xiang, W.; Wang, T.; Hu, W.; Hu, Y.; Chen, S.; Chen, J.; Dai, Z. Synthesis of graphene quantum dots from natural polymer starch for cell imaging. Green Chem. 2018, 20, 4438–4442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Ramanan, V.; Thiyagarajan, S.K.; Raji, K.; Suresh, R.; Sekar, R.; Ramamurthy, P. Outright green synthesis of fluorescent carbon dots from eutrophic algal blooms for in vitro imaging. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 4724–4731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Zhang, J.; Liu, X.; Zhou, J.; Huang, X.; Xie, D.; Ni, J.; Ni, C. Carbon dots derived from algae as H2O2 sensors: The importance of nutrients in biomass. Nanoscale Adv. 2019, 1, 2151–2156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Liu, H.; Li, Z.; Sun, Y.; Geng, X.; Hu, Y.; Meng, H.; Ge, J.; Qu, L. Synthesis of Luminescent Carbon Dots with Ultrahigh Quantum Yield and Inherent Folate Receptor-Positive Cancer Cell Targetability. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Shen, L.; Zhang, L.; Chen, M.; Chen, X.; Wang, J. The production of pH-sensitive photoluminescent carbon nanoparticles by the carbonization of polyethylenimine and their use for bioimaging. Carbon 2013, 55, 343–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Wang, S.; Niu, H.; He, S.; Cai, Y. One-step fabrication of high quantum yield sulfur- and nitrogen-doped carbon dots for sensitive and selective detection of Cr(vi). RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 107717–107722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Huang, Q.; Li, Q.; Chen, Y.; Tong, L.; Lin, X.; Zhu, J.; Tong, Q. High quantum yield nitrogen-doped carbon dots: Green synthesis and application as “off-on” fluorescent sensors for the determination of Fe3+ and adenosine triphosphate in biological samples. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2018, 276, 82–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Li, M.; Yu, C.; Hu, C.; Yang, W.; Zhao, C.; Wang, S.; Zhang, M.; Zhao, J.; Wang, X.; Qiu, J. Solvothermal conversion of coal into nitrogen-doped carbon dots with singlet oxygen generation and high quantum yield. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 320, 570–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Wang, Y.; Xia, Y. Optical, electrochemical and catalytic methods for in-vitro diagnosis using carbonaceous nanoparticles: A review. Microchim. Acta 2019, 186, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Xu, Q.; Li, B.; Ye, Y.; Cai, W.; Li, W.; Yang, C.; Chen, Y.; Xu, M.; Li, N.; Zheng, X.; et al. Synthesis, mechanical investigation, and application of nitrogen and phosphorus co-doped carbon dots with a high photoluminescent quantum yield. Nano Res. 2018, 11, 3691–3701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Dong, Y.; Pang, H.; Bin Yang, H.; Guo, C.; Shao, J.; Chi, Y.; Li, C.M.; Yu, T. Carbon-Based Dots Co-doped with Nitrogen and Sulfur for High Quantum Yield and Excitation-Independent Emission. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 7800–7804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Ding, H.; Wei, J.-S.; Xiong, H.-M. Nitrogen and sulfur co-doped carbon dots with strong blue luminescence. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 13817–13823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Qin, X.; Lu, W.; Asiri, A.M.; Al-Youbi, A.O.; Sun, X. Green, low-cost synthesis of photoluminescent carbon dots by hydrothermal treatment of willow bark and their application as an effective photocatalyst for fabricating Au nanoparticles–reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites for glucose detection. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2013, 3, 1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Lu, W.; Qin, X.; Liu, S.; Chang, G.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, Y.; Asiri, A.M.; Al-Youbi, A.O.; Sun, X. Economical, Green Synthesis of Fluorescent Carbon Nanoparticles and Their Use as Probes for Sensitive and Selective Detection of Mercury(II) Ions. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 5351–5357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Zhao, X.J.; Zhang, W.L.; Zhou, Z.Q. Sodium hydroxide-mediated hydrogel of citrus pectin for preparation of fluorescent carbon dots for bioimaging. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 2014, 123, 493–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Feng, X.; Jiang, Y.; Zhao, J.; Miao, M.; Cao, S.; Fang, J.; Shi, L. Easy synthesis of photoluminescent N-doped carbon dots from winter melon for bio-imaging. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 31250–31254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Hsu, P.-C.; Shih, Z.-Y.; Lee, C.-H.; Chang, H.-T. Synthesis and analytical applications of photoluminescent carbon nanodots. Green Chem. 2012, 14, 917–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Niemirycz, E.; Nichthauser, J.; Staniszewska, M.; Nałęcz-Jawecki, G.; Bolałek, J. The Microtox® biological test: Application in toxicity evaluation of surface waters and sediments in Poland. Oceanol. Hydrobiol. Stud. 2007, 36, 151–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. EPA’s Science Policy Council. Nanotechnology White Paper. EPA 100/B-07/001; EPA’s Science Policy Council: Washington, DC, USA, 2007. Available online: www.epa.gov/osa (accessed on 11 June 2021).
  125. Savolainen, K.; Backman, U.; Brouwer, D.; Fadeel, B.; Fernandes, T.; Kuhlbusch, T.; Landsiedel, R.; Lynch, I.; Pylkkanen, L. Nanosafety in Europe 2015–2025: Towards Safe and Sustainable Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology Innovations; Finnish Institute of Occupational Health: Helsinki, Finland, 2013.
  126. Saleh, T.A. Nanomaterials: Classification, properties, and environmental toxicities. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2020, 20, 101067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Alas, M.O.; Alkas, F.B.; Sukuroglu, A.A.; Alturk, R.G.; Battal, D. Fluorescent carbon dots are the new quantum dots: An overview of their potential in emerging technologies and nanosafety. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55, 15074–15105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Yao, K.; Lv, X.; Zheng, G.; Chen, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Zhu, X.; Wang, Z.; Cai, Z. Effects of Carbon Quantum Dots on Aquatic Environments: Comparison of Toxicity to Organisms at Different Trophic Levels. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 14445–14451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Picea, Molinia caerulea and Elaeis guineensis biochar FTIR spectra.
Figure 1. Picea, Molinia caerulea and Elaeis guineensis biochar FTIR spectra.
Processes 09 01095 g001
Figure 2. Picea, Molinia caerulea, and Elaeis guineensis C-Dots FTIR spectra.
Figure 2. Picea, Molinia caerulea, and Elaeis guineensis C-Dots FTIR spectra.
Processes 09 01095 g002
Figure 3. TEM images of (a) Picea, (b) Molinia caerulea and (c) Elaeis guineensis. Histogram of particle diameter distribution of C-Dots (inset).
Figure 3. TEM images of (a) Picea, (b) Molinia caerulea and (c) Elaeis guineensis. Histogram of particle diameter distribution of C-Dots (inset).
Processes 09 01095 g003
Figure 4. Emission spectra of C-Dots under different excitation wavelengths. (a) Picea. (b) Molinia caerulea. (c) Elaeis guineensis.
Figure 4. Emission spectra of C-Dots under different excitation wavelengths. (a) Picea. (b) Molinia caerulea. (c) Elaeis guineensis.
Processes 09 01095 g004
Figure 5. UV-Vis spectra of Picea, Molinia caerulea, and Elaeis guineensis C-Dots.
Figure 5. UV-Vis spectra of Picea, Molinia caerulea, and Elaeis guineensis C-Dots.
Processes 09 01095 g005
Figure 6. Aquatic toxicity test results for Picea (a), Molinia caerulea (b) and Elaeis guineensis (c). Gamma = 1 corresponds to the EC50. Horizontal axis corresponds to the percentage of the concentration, where 100% equals 1000 ppm.
Figure 6. Aquatic toxicity test results for Picea (a), Molinia caerulea (b) and Elaeis guineensis (c). Gamma = 1 corresponds to the EC50. Horizontal axis corresponds to the percentage of the concentration, where 100% equals 1000 ppm.
Processes 09 01095 g006
Table 1. Physicochemical characteristics of biochar.
Table 1. Physicochemical characteristics of biochar.
ParameterPiceaMolinia caeruleaElaeis guineensis
pH8.99.588.26
% N (total organic)0.293.420.2
% S (total)0.431.461.5
% Ash-6.8011.1
Source[59]This workThis work
Table 2. Comparison of several hydrothermally produced C-Dots with different biomass precursors.
Table 2. Comparison of several hydrothermally produced C-Dots with different biomass precursors.
Carbon Precursor λ e x c (nm) QY%Reference
Willow Bark3606[118]
Pomelo peel3606.9[119]
Citrus pectin3601.1[120]
Sugarcane juice3905.67[95]
Winter melon3607.51[121]
Coffee beans3653.80[122]
Picea3105.44This work
Molinia caerulea3208.39This work
Elaeis guineensis3102.31This work
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Barrientos, K.; Gaviria, M.I.; Arango, J.P.; Placido, J.; Bustamante, S.; Londoño, M.E.; Jaramillo, M. Synthesis, Characterization and Ecotoxicity Evaluation of Biochar-Derived Carbon Dots from Spruce Tree, Purple Moor-Grass and African Oil Palm. Processes 2021, 9, 1095. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9071095

AMA Style

Barrientos K, Gaviria MI, Arango JP, Placido J, Bustamante S, Londoño ME, Jaramillo M. Synthesis, Characterization and Ecotoxicity Evaluation of Biochar-Derived Carbon Dots from Spruce Tree, Purple Moor-Grass and African Oil Palm. Processes. 2021; 9(7):1095. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9071095

Chicago/Turabian Style

Barrientos, Kaory, Maria I. Gaviria, Juan Pablo Arango, Jersson Placido, Sandra Bustamante, Martha E. Londoño, and Marisol Jaramillo. 2021. "Synthesis, Characterization and Ecotoxicity Evaluation of Biochar-Derived Carbon Dots from Spruce Tree, Purple Moor-Grass and African Oil Palm" Processes 9, no. 7: 1095. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9071095

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop