Risks 2013, 1(3), 162-175; doi:10.3390/risks1030162

U.S. Equity Mean-Reversion Examined

Johns Hopkins Carey Business School 100 International Drive, Office 1355, Baltimore, Maryland, 21202, USA
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 16 October 2013; in revised form: 13 November 2013 / Accepted: 18 November 2013 / Published: 4 December 2013
PDF Full-text Download PDF Full-Text [656 KB, uploaded 4 December 2013 15:58 CET]
Abstract: In this paper we introduce an intra-sector dynamic trading strategy that captures mean-reversion opportunities across liquid U.S. stocks. Our strategy combines the Avellaneda and Lee methodology (AL; Quant. Financ. 2010, 10, 761–782) within the Black and Litterman framework (BL; J. Fixed Income, 1991, 1, 7–18; Financ. Anal. J. 1992, 48, 28–43). In particular, we incorporate the s-scores and the conditional mean returns from the Orstein and Ulhembeck (Phys. Rev. 1930, 36, 823–841) process into BL. We find that our combined strategy ALBL has generated a 45% increase in Sharpe Ratio when compared to the uncombined AL strategy over the period from January 2, 2001 to May 27, 2010. These new indices, built to capture dynamic trading strategies, will definitely be an interesting addition to the growing hedge fund index offerings. This paper introduces our first “focused-core” strategy, namely, U.S. Equity Mean-Reversion.
Keywords: Black–Litterman; US stocks; dynamic trading strategy; mean-reversion; quantitative finance; statistical arbitrage

Article Statistics

Load and display the download statistics.

Citations to this Article

Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Liew, J.; Roberts, R. U.S. Equity Mean-Reversion Examined. Risks 2013, 1, 162-175.

AMA Style

Liew J, Roberts R. U.S. Equity Mean-Reversion Examined. Risks. 2013; 1(3):162-175.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liew, Jim; Roberts, Ryan. 2013. "U.S. Equity Mean-Reversion Examined." Risks 1, no. 3: 162-175.

Risks EISSN 2227-9091 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert