Comparison of CPAP and HFNC in Management of Bronchiolitis in Infants and Young Children
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Settings and Patients
2.2. Data Management
2.3. Statistical Analysis
2.4. Ethical Approval
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Haerskjold, A.; Kristensen, K.; Kamper-Jørgensen, M.; Andersen, A.-M.N.; Ravn, H.; Stensballe, L.G. Risk Factors for Hospitalization for Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection: A Population-Based Cohort Study of Danish Children. Pediatr Infect. Dis J. 2015, 35, 61–65. [Google Scholar]
- Essouri, S.; Durand, P.; Chevret, L.; Balu, L.; Devictor, D.; Fauroux, B.; Tissières, P. Optimal level of nasal continuous positive airway pressure in severe viral bronchiolitis. Intensive Care Med. 2011, 37, 2002–2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gupta, S.; Donn, S.M. Continuous positive airway pressure: Physiology and comparison of devices. Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016, 21, 204–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thia, L.P.; McKenzie, S.A.; Blyth, T.P.; Minasian, C.C.; Kozlowska, W.J.; Carr, S.B. Randomised controlled trial of nasal continuous positive airways pressure (CPAP) in bronchiolitis. Arch. Dis. Child. 2008, 93, 45–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Milési, C.; Matecki, S.; Jaber, S.; Mura, T.; Jacquot, A.; Pidoux, O.; Chautemps, N.; Novais, A.; Combes, C.; Picaud, J.; et al. 6 cmH2O continuous positive airway pressure versus conventional oxygen therapy in severe viral bronchiolitis: A randomized trial. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2013, 48, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Donlan, M.; Fontela, P.S.; Puligandla, P.S. Use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in acute viral bronchiolitis: A systematic review. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2011, 46, 736–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jat, K.; Matthew, J.L. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for acute bronchiolitis in children (Review) Summary of Findings for the Main Comparison. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015, 1, CD010473. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Pham, T.M.T.; O’Malley, L.; Mayfield, S.; Martin, S.; Schibler, A. The effect of high flow nasal cannula therapy on the work of breathing in infants with bronchiolitis. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2015, 50, 713–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Milési, C.; Baleine, J.; Matecki, S.; Durand, S.; Combes, C.; Novais, A.; Combonie, G. Is treatment with a high flow nasal cannula effective in acute viral bronchiolitis? A physiologic study. Intensive Care Med. 2013, 39, 1088–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Spentzas, T.; Minarik, M.; Patters, A.B.; Vinson, B.; Stidham, G. Children with respiratory distress treated with high-flow nasal cannula. J. Intensive Care Med. 2009, 24, 323–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dysart, K.; Miller, T.L.; Wolfson, M.R.; Shaffer, T.H. Research in high flow therapy: Mechanisms of action. Respir Med. 2009, 103, 1400–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yoder, B.A.; Stoddard, R.A.; Li, M.; King, J.; Dirnberger, D.R.; Abbasi, S. Heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula versus nasal CPAP for respiratory support in neonates. Pediatrics. 2013, 131, e1482–e1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bressan, S.; Balzani, M.; Krauss, B.; Pettenazzo, A.; Zanconato, S.; Baraldi, E. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen for bronchiolitis in a pediatric ward: A pilot study. Eur J. Pediatr. 2013, 172, 1649–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mayfield, S.; Bogossian, F.; O’Malley, L.; Schibler, A. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy for infants with bronchiolitis: Pilot study. J. Paediatr. Child Health 2014, 50, 373–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Beggs, S.; Zh, W.; Kaul, S.; Kj, O.; Jae, W. High-flow nasal cannula therapy for infants with bronchiolitis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014, 20, CD009609. [Google Scholar]
- Mayfield, S.; Jauncey-Cooke, J.; Hough, J.L; Schibler, A.; Gibbons, K.; Bogossian, F. High-flow nasal cannula therapy for respiratory support in children. Cochrane database Syst. Rev. 2014, 3, CD009850. [Google Scholar]
- Metge, P.; Grimaldi, C.; Hassid, S.; Thomachot, L.; Loundou, A.; Martin, C.; Michel, F. Comparison of a high-flow humidified nasal cannula to nasal continuous positive airway pressure in children with acute bronchiolitis: Experience in a pediatric intensive care unit. Eur J. Pediatr. 2014, 173, 953–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Milesi, C.; Essouri, S.; Pouyau, R.; Liet, J.; Afanetti, M.; Portefaix, A.; Baleine, J.; Durand, S.; Combes, C.; Douillard, A.; et al. High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) for the initial respiratory management of acute viral bronchiolitis in young infants: a multicenter randomized controlled trial (TRAMONTANE study). Intensive Care Med. 2017, 43, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
nCPAP | HFNC | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|
n | 27 | 22 | |
Gender, boys n (%) | 13 (48) | 8 (36) | ns |
Age, months, median (IQ range) | 1.7 (1.2–3.0) | 2.2 (1.53–5.33) | ns |
Gestational age at birth, weeks + days, median (IQ range) | 39 + 3 (38 + 2–40 + 0) | 40 (37 + 3–40 + 3) | ns |
Weight, kg, median (IQ range) | 5.2 (3.9–6.6) | 5.3 (4.7–6.7) | ns |
Symptom duration, days , median (IQ range) | 4 (2–5) | 5 (4–7) | 0.052 |
RSV positive, n (%) | 24 (89.9) | 19 (90.5) | ns |
Atelectasis, n (%) | 7 (30.4) | 6 (33.3) | ns |
pCO2, kPa, median (IQ range) | 7.4 (5.6–8.3) | 7.4 (6–8.3) | ns |
Respiratory Rate per minute, median (IQ range) | 57 (48–62) | 58 (50–60) | ns |
FiO2, % (IQ range) | 30 (21–35) | 30 (25–35) | ns |
Pulse, per minute | 156 (148–170) | 161 (148–178) | ns |
nCPAP | HFNC | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|
Duration of treatment, median (hours) | 93.5 (58.3–163.0) | 93.0 (70–146) | ns |
Duration of hospitalization, median (days) | 7 (4–10) | 8 (5–11) | ns |
Device failure (shift to opposite), n (%) | 0 (0%) | 12 (55%) | <0.001 |
Device failure (referral to PICU), n (%) | 4 (15%) | 5 (24%) | ns |
© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Pedersen, M.B.; Vahlkvist, S. Comparison of CPAP and HFNC in Management of Bronchiolitis in Infants and Young Children. Children 2017, 4, 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/children4040028
Pedersen MB, Vahlkvist S. Comparison of CPAP and HFNC in Management of Bronchiolitis in Infants and Young Children. Children. 2017; 4(4):28. https://doi.org/10.3390/children4040028
Chicago/Turabian StylePedersen, Majken Bisgaard, and Signe Vahlkvist. 2017. "Comparison of CPAP and HFNC in Management of Bronchiolitis in Infants and Young Children" Children 4, no. 4: 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/children4040028