Next Article in Journal
Large-Scale No-Show Patterns and Distributions for Clinic Operational Research
Next Article in Special Issue
Public Health Approaches and Barriers to Educating Providers about Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome
Previous Article in Journal
Musculoskeletal Disorders and Working Posture among Dental and Oral Health Students
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hereditary Cancer: Example of a Public Health Approach to Ensure Population Health Benefits of Genetic Medicine
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessConference Report
Healthcare 2016, 4(1), 14; doi:10.3390/healthcare4010014

Expert and Advocacy Group Consensus Findings on the Horizon of Public Health Genetic Testing

1
Departments of Health Management and Policy, and Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 4628 SPH Tower, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, USA
2
Department of Health Policy, Management and Behavior, School of Public Health, State University of New York at Albany, One University Place, Rm. 169, Rensselaer, NY 12144-3456, USA
3
Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, M3049, SPH II, 1415 Washington Hts., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, USA
4
Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 4619A SPH Tower, 1415 Washington Hts., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Cecelia A. Bellcross and Debra Duquette
Received: 31 August 2015 / Revised: 18 December 2015 / Accepted: 18 January 2016 / Published: 27 January 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Implementation of Public Health Genomics)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1287 KB, uploaded 27 January 2016]   |  

Abstract

Description: Among the two leading causes of death in the United States, each responsible for one in every four deaths, heart disease costs Americans $300 billion, while cancer costs Americans $216 billion per year. They also rank among the top three causes of death in Europe and Asia. In 2012 the University of Michigan Center for Public Health and Community Genomics and Genetic Alliance, with the support of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office of Public Health Genomics, hosted a conference in Atlanta, Georgia to consider related action strategies based on public health genomics. The aim of the conference was consensus building on recommendations to implement genetic screening for three major heritable contributors to these mortality and cost figures: hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), and Lynch syndrome (LS). Genetic applications for these three conditions are labeled with a “Tier 1” designation by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention because they have been fully validated and clinical practice guidelines based on systematic review support them. Methodology: The conference followed a deliberative sequence starting with nationally recognized clinical and public health presenters for each condition, followed by a Patient and Community Perspectives Panel, working group sessions for each of the conditions, and a final plenary session. The 74 conference participants represented disease research and advocacy, public health, medicine and nursing, genetics, governmental health agencies, and industry. Participants drew on a public health framework interconnecting policy, clinical intervention, surveillance, and educational functions for their deliberations. Results: Participants emphasized the importance of collaboration between clinical, public health, and advocacy groups in implementing Tier 1 genetic screening. Advocacy groups could help with individual and institutional buy-in of Tier 1 programs. Groups differed on funding strategies, with alternative options such as large-scale federal funding and smaller scale, incremental funding solutions proposed. Piggybacking on existing federal breast and colorectal cancer control programs was suggested. Public health departments need to assess what information is now being collected by their state cancer registries. The groups advised that information on cascade screening of relatives be included in toolkits for use by states. Participants stressed incorporation of family history into health department breast cancer screening programs, and clinical HBOC data into state surveillance systems. The carrying out of universal LS screening of tumors in those with colorectal cancer was reviewed. Expansion of universal screening to include endometrial tumors was discussed, as was the application of guidelines recommending cholesterol screening of children 9–11 years old. States more advanced in terms of Tier 1 testing could serve as models and partners with other states launching screening and surveillance programs. A multidisciplinary team of screening program champions was suggested as a means of raising awareness among the consumer and health care communities. Participants offered multiple recommendations regarding use of electronic health records, including flagging of at-risk family members and utilization of state-level health information exchanges. The paper contains an update of policy developments and happenings for all three Tier 1 conditions, as well as identified gaps. Conclusions: Implementation of cascade screening of family members for HBOC and FH, and universal screening for LS in CRC tumors has reached a point of readiness within the U.S., with creative solutions at hand. Facilitating factors such as screening coverage through the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, and state health information exchanges can be tapped. Collaboration is needed between public health departments, health care systems, disease advocacy groups, and industry to fully realize Tier 1 genetic screening. State health department and disease networks currently engaged in Tier 1 screening can serve as models for the launch of new initiatives. View Full-Text
Keywords: health policy; genomics; cascade screening; electronic health records; surveillance; hereditary breast and ovarian cancer; familial hypercholesterolemia; Lynch syndrome; consumer advocacy; consensus health policy; genomics; cascade screening; electronic health records; surveillance; hereditary breast and ovarian cancer; familial hypercholesterolemia; Lynch syndrome; consumer advocacy; consensus
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Modell, S.M.; Greendale, K.; Citrin, T.; Kardia, S.L.R. Expert and Advocacy Group Consensus Findings on the Horizon of Public Health Genetic Testing. Healthcare 2016, 4, 14.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Healthcare EISSN 2227-9032 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top