Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Social Relationships on the Well-Being and Happiness of Older Adults Living Alone or with Relatives
Next Article in Special Issue
Understanding the Role of Children’s Footwear on Children’s Feet and Gait Development: A Systematic Scoping Review
Previous Article in Journal
Physiological State Evaluation in Working Environment Using Expert System and Random Forest Machine Learning Algorithm
Previous Article in Special Issue
Physical Function of Japanese Preadolescents during the COVID-19 Pandemic
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Evaluation of Muscle Oxygen Dynamics in Children’s Gait and Its Relationship with the Physiological Cost Index

Healthcare 2023, 11(2), 221; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11020221
by Yuya Shirai 1,2, Tadashi Ito 1,3, Yuji Ito 4,5, Naomichi Matsunaga 1, Koji Noritake 6, Nobuhiko Ochi 5 and Hideshi Sugiura 1,*
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Healthcare 2023, 11(2), 221; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11020221
Submission received: 7 December 2022 / Revised: 2 January 2023 / Accepted: 10 January 2023 / Published: 11 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The comments are included in the attached file.

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

First of all, congratulations for the work done, then I will mention a number of changes and recommendations in order to obtain clearer and more accurate information.

- Comments on the abstract:

Avoid the use of abbreviations I the abstract

- Comments on the material and methods:

Numbers from zero to ten must be in letters

 

In general, the changes to be made are minor and at the level of form. At the methodological level, I do not see any serious shortcomings in the study.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors responded to my comments.

Please correct literature 34,37,46,47. The record is inconsistent with the authors' guidelines

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop