Next Article in Journal
Educational Justice
Next Article in Special Issue
Mathematics Intervention Supporting Allen, a Latino EL: A Case Study
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Conceptualizations of Students with and without Disabilities as Mathematical Problem Solvers in Educational Research: A Critical Review
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Educ. Sci. 2017, 7(2), 52; doi:10.3390/educsci7020052

Effects of Instructional Guidance and Sequencing of Manipulatives and Written Symbols on Second Graders’ Numeration Knowledge

Department of Education, Concordia University, 1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd. Ouest, Montréal, QC H3G 1M8, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Patricia S. Moyer-Packenham
Received: 22 December 2016 / Revised: 20 April 2017 / Accepted: 21 April 2017 / Published: 3 May 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Critical Issues in Mathematics Education)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1321 KB, uploaded 3 May 2017]   |  

Abstract

Concrete objects used to illustrate mathematical ideas are commonly known as manipulatives. Manipulatives are ubiquitous in North American elementary classrooms in the early years, and although they can be beneficial, they do not guarantee learning. In the present study, the authors examined two factors hypothesized to impact second-graders’ learning of place value and regrouping with manipulatives: (a) the sequencing of concrete (base-ten blocks) and abstract (written symbols) representations of the standard addition algorithm; and (b) the level of instructional guidance on the structural relations between the representations. Results from a classroom experiment with second-grade students (N = 87) indicated that place value knowledge increased from pre-test to post-test when the base-ten blocks were presented before the symbols, but only when no instructional guidance was offered. When guidance was given, only students in the symbols-first condition improved their place value knowledge. Students who received instruction increased their understanding of regrouping, irrespective of representational sequence. No effects were found for iterative sequencing of concrete and abstract representations. Practical implications for teaching mathematics with manipulatives are considered. View Full-Text
Keywords: instructional guidance; representational sequencing; conceptual knowledge; manipulatives instructional guidance; representational sequencing; conceptual knowledge; manipulatives
Figures

Figure 2

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Osana, H.P.; Adrien, E.; Duponsel, N. Effects of Instructional Guidance and Sequencing of Manipulatives and Written Symbols on Second Graders’ Numeration Knowledge. Educ. Sci. 2017, 7, 52.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Educ. Sci. EISSN 2227-7102 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top