Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Effects of Instructional Guidance and Sequencing of Manipulatives and Written Symbols on Second Graders’ Numeration Knowledge
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
I Thought This Was a Study on Math Games: Attribute Modification in Children’s Interactions with Mathematics Apps
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessReview
Educ. Sci. 2017, 7(2), 51; doi:10.3390/educsci7020051

Conceptualizations of Students with and without Disabilities as Mathematical Problem Solvers in Educational Research: A Critical Review

1
College of Educational Studies, Chapman University, Orange, CA 92866, USA
2
School of Urban Education, University of Tulsa, Tulsa OK 74104, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Patricia S. Moyer-Packenham
Received: 16 January 2017 / Revised: 17 April 2017 / Accepted: 18 April 2017 / Published: 1 May 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Critical Issues in Mathematics Education)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1004 KB, uploaded 4 May 2017]   |  

Abstract

Students with disabilities are often framed as “the problem” and have limited opportunities to engage in standards based mathematics, leading to persistent underachievement. In this paper, we investigate a research divide between mathematics educational research for students with and without disabilities, a divide with significant differences in the theoretical orientations and research methodologies used to understand learners. Based on an analysis of 149 mathematics educational research articles published between 2013 and 2015, we found significant differences between articles focused on learners with and without disabilities. For those with disabilities, mathematical problem solving was understood primarily from behavioral and information processing theoretical perspectives, while for those without disabilities, problem solving was understood primarily through constructivist and sociocultural perspectives. While 86% of research on problem-solving including students with disabilities was quantitative, only 35% of research on students without disabilities was quantitative. Fifty percent of problem-solving research on students without disabilities was qualitative, compared to only 6% of research on students with disabilities. Problem solving, then, is studied in very different ways for learners with and without disabilities. Students without disabilities are studied through close analysis of learning, often individual. Students with disabilities are most often studied quantitatively, in groups, with little analysis of individual thinking. By offering only a limited range of methods and theoretical orientations, this research divide reifies deficit constructions of students with disabilities. View Full-Text
Keywords: mathematics education; special education; problem solving; critical mathematics education; disability studies mathematics education; special education; problem solving; critical mathematics education; disability studies
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Lambert, R.; Tan, P. Conceptualizations of Students with and without Disabilities as Mathematical Problem Solvers in Educational Research: A Critical Review. Educ. Sci. 2017, 7, 51.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Educ. Sci. EISSN 2227-7102 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top