Next Article in Journal
Networking Theories on Giftedness—What We Can Learn from Synthesizing Renzulli’s Domain General and Krutetskii’s Mathematics-Specific Theory
Next Article in Special Issue
With Socrates on Your Heels and Descartes in Your Hand: On the Notion of Conflict in John Dewey’s Democracy and Education
Previous Article in Journal
How the Mastery Rubric for Statistical Literacy Can Generate Actionable Evidence about Statistical and Quantitative Learning Outcomes
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Educ. Sci. 2017, 7(1), 5;

Democracy and Bildung/Erziehung—Towards a Universal Theory of Education

Institute of Educational Science, University of Münster, Bispinghof5/6, 48143 Münster, Germany
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Paul Standish and SunInn Yun
Received: 25 October 2016 / Revised: 13 December 2016 / Accepted: 17 December 2016 / Published: 26 December 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Democracy and Education at 100)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [312 KB, uploaded 26 December 2016]   |  


Dewey’s Democracy and Education is re-read as an attempt to develop a universal theory of education that, on the one hand, gives the broadest, most general view on education and, on the other hand, contextualizes every observation by binding it to the assumed perspective. Dewey’s broad concept of education encompasses two dimensions that in the German discourse are usually connected to the distinction of Erziehung and Bildung. In its first dimension, it avoids a widespread “scholastic” view of education by focusing not only on formal but also on informal education. In its second dimension, it also avoids a widespread individualistic view on education by referring not only to growth of the individual, but also to growth of the social setting (democracy) on the whole. This outlook allows for investigating and reflecting any subject matter with respect to its educational aspects—including the process of theorizing itself. This reflective turn of theorizing education has consequences for the understanding of education as an academic field. A universal theory of education is at odds both with a disciplinary approach and the idea of education as an applied field for foundational disciplines. At the same time, it has the potential to reconnect to both configurations of the academic field if these configurations are understood slightly different than today. View Full-Text
Keywords: philosophy of education; science of education; educational theory; theorizing; Bildung; academic field of education philosophy of education; science of education; educational theory; theorizing; Bildung; academic field of education

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Bellmann, J.; Su, H. Democracy and Bildung/Erziehung—Towards a Universal Theory of Education. Educ. Sci. 2017, 7, 5.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Educ. Sci. EISSN 2227-7102 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top