Next Article in Journal
Is Subjective Knowledge the Key to Fostering Sustainable Behavior? Mixed Evidence from an Education Intervention in Mexico
Next Article in Special Issue
How the Mastery Rubric for Statistical Literacy Can Generate Actionable Evidence about Statistical and Quantitative Learning Outcomes
Previous Article in Journal
Teaching Methods in Biology Education and Sustainability Education Including Outdoor Education for Promoting Sustainability—A Literature Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Reevaluating Bloom’s Taxonomy: What Measurable Verbs Can and Cannot Say about Student Learning
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Educ. Sci. 2017, 7(1), 2; doi:10.3390/educsci7010002

Evidence of Sustainable Learning from the Mastery Rubric for Ethical Reasoning

1
Collaborative for Research on Outcomes and Metrics; Departments of Neurology; Biostatistics, Bioinformatics & Biomathematics; Rehabilitation Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Suite 207 Building D, 4000 Reservoir Road NW, Washington, DC 20057, USA
2
Catholic Health Care Ethics; Pellegrino Center for Clinical Bioethics; Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Suite 236, Building D, 4000 Reservoir Road NW, Washington, DC 20057, USA
3
Professor Emeritus, Georgetown University, 37th & O Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20057, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: James Albright
Received: 8 July 2016 / Revised: 5 December 2016 / Accepted: 8 December 2016 / Published: 23 December 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Consequential Assessment of Student Learning)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [262 KB, uploaded 23 December 2016]

Abstract

Interest in sustainable learning has been growing over the past 20 years but it has never been determined whether students—whose learning we are trying to sustain—can perceive either the sustainability of their learning or any of the features of this construct. A four-item survey was developed based on a published definition of “sustainable learning”, and was sent to the 12 graduate students who have completed a new seminar in ethical reasoning. A thematic analysis of the narrative responses was submitted to a degrees-of-freedom analysis to determine the level and type of evidence for student perception of sustainability. Respondents (n = 9) endorsed each of the four dimensions of sustainable learning—and each gave examples for each dimension outside of, and after the end of, the course. One respondent endorsed all dimensions of sustainable learning, but was uncertain whether the course itself led to one particular sustainability dimension. While these results must be considered preliminary because our sample is small and the survey is the first of its kind, they suggest that graduate students can and do perceive each of the four features of sustainability. The survey needs refinement for future/wider use; but this four-dimensional definition could be useful to develop and promote (and assess) sustainable learning in higher education. View Full-Text
Keywords: Mastery Rubric; sustainable learning; ethics education; metacognition; actionable evidence of learning Mastery Rubric; sustainable learning; ethics education; metacognition; actionable evidence of learning
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Tractenberg, R.E.; FitzGerald, K.T.; Collmann, J. Evidence of Sustainable Learning from the Mastery Rubric for Ethical Reasoning. Educ. Sci. 2017, 7, 2.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Educ. Sci. EISSN 2227-7102 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top