Next Article in Journal
Money and Pay-As-You-Go Pension
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Conditional Cash Transfers (CCT) in Anti-Poverty Programs. An Empirical Approach with Panel Data for the Mexican Case of PROSPERA-Oportunidades (2002–2012)
Previous Article in Journal
The Environmental Consequences of Growth: Empirical Evidence from the Republic of Kazakhstan
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sustainability Performance of an Italian Textile Product
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Economies 2018, 6(2), 20; https://doi.org/10.3390/economies6020020

Identifying Sustainability and Knowledge Gaps in Socio-Economic Pathways Vis-à-Vis the Sustainable Development Goals

1
Transitions to New Technologies Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Schlossplatz, 1-A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
2
School of Geography and Environment, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK
3
Ecosystem Services and Management Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Schlossplatz, 1-A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 31 October 2017 / Revised: 18 February 2018 / Accepted: 19 February 2018 / Published: 26 March 2018
Full-Text   |   PDF [3728 KB, uploaded 3 May 2018]   |  

Abstract

With the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the global community has set itself an ambitious development agenda. Current analytical and quantitative modeling capabilities fall short of being able to capture all 17 SDGs and their targets. Even highly ambitious and optimistic pathways currently used in research, such as SSP1/SSP1-2.6, do not meet all SDGs (sustainability gaps) and fail to provide information on some of them (knowledge gaps). We show that for research and modeling purposes, the SDG targets can serve as a basis but need to be operationalized to reduce complexity and also to account for long-term sustainability concerns beyond 2030. We have explored here the requirements for assessing more comprehensively the sustainability of development pathways, guided by holistic interpretation of the SDGs to enable an assessment of the potential embedded synergies and trade-offs between the economic, social and environmental objectives. We see this as call for action for science to work on filling these gaps. At the same time, this is also a call for policy makers and the global community to close the sustainability gaps that emerge from such analysis. We anticipate that such analysis will provide useful information for policy advice and investment decisions during implementation of the UN 2030 Agenda. View Full-Text
Keywords: sustainable development goals; SDG; integrated development pathways; Shared Socio-economic Pathways; SSP; sustainable development; transformation sustainable development goals; SDG; integrated development pathways; Shared Socio-economic Pathways; SSP; sustainable development; transformation
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Zimm, C.; Sperling, F.; Busch, S. Identifying Sustainability and Knowledge Gaps in Socio-Economic Pathways Vis-à-Vis the Sustainable Development Goals. Economies 2018, 6, 20.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Economies EISSN 2227-7099 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top