Next Article in Journal
Drone Forensics: An Innovative Approach to the Forensic Investigation of Drone Accidents Based on Digital Twin Technology
Next Article in Special Issue
A 28 GHz Highly Linear Up-Conversion Mixer for 5G Cellular Communications
Previous Article in Journal
A Mixed Reality Design System for Interior Renovation: Inpainting with 360-Degree Live Streaming and Generative Adversarial Networks after Removal
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Miniaturized Antenna for Millimeter-Wave 5G-II Band Communication

1
Department of Aeronautical and Automobile Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India
2
Department of Instrumentation and Control Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India
3
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India
4
Ignion, 08174 Barcelona, Spain
5
Research Group on Smart Society, La Salle Engineering, Universitat Ramon Llull, 08022 Barcelona, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Technologies 2024, 12(1), 10; https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies12010010
Submission received: 16 December 2023 / Revised: 11 January 2024 / Accepted: 16 January 2024 / Published: 18 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Intelligent Reflecting Surfaces for 5G and Beyond Volume II)

Abstract

:
This article introduces a miniaturized antenna for 5G-II band millimeter-wave communication. The antenna’s performance is meticulously examined through comprehensive simulations carried out using CST Microwave Studio, employing an FR-4 substrate with dimensions measuring 12 × 14 × 1.6 mm3. The proposed design exhibits exceptional qualities, featuring an impressive impedance bandwidth of 70.4% and a remarkable return loss of −35 dBi. The operational frequency range of this antenna extends from 16.2 GHz to 33.8 GHz, featuring a central frequency of 25 GHz, positioning it effectively within the 5G-II Band. The antenna consistently maintains polar patterns throughout this spectrum, which guarantees dependable and efficient performance. It showcases a substantial gain of 3.85 dBi and an impressive efficiency rating of 82.9%. Renowned for its versatility, this antenna is well suited for a diverse range of applications, including but not limited to Ka band, Ku band, 5G-II bands, and various other purposes in microwaves.

1. Introduction

Entering an era marked by surging connectivity demands and data prerequisites, the introduction of the 5G-II band signifies a significant advancement. This innovative iteration in wireless communication operates within the designated frequency range of the 5G-II band, finely tuned to address the specific requirements of swift data transmission, minimal latency, and seamless connectivity. This exploration aims to unveil the capabilities and significance of the 5G-II band, shedding light on its potential to reshape contemporary communication and usher in a future where connectivity knows no bounds.
In the field of wireless communications, a diverse range of antenna designs with unique shapes and characteristics are extensively used. These designs, consisting of semi-circular and U-shaped antennas, are documented in various sources [1]. A T-shaped structure has been employed to resonate at the higher mode (28 GHz), as reported in [2]. As discussed in [3], a complete ground plane is implemented to ensure a stable radiation pattern. Researchers have actively explored techniques to enhance antenna performance, with a notable strategy involving the manipulation of the antenna’s ground plane through the incorporation of parasitic elements, which has been proven to boost antenna performance significantly [4]. Introducing a slot in the microstrip line increases the resonance in both modes [5]. Another study presents a rectangular microstrip antenna designed for 5G-band applications [6]. Additionally, the integration of small fractal components has been explored to contribute to overall improvements in antenna attributes. Circular and U-shaped slots have also been integrated into designs, impacting parameters such as bandwidth and radiation patterns [7].
Advancements in aerospace communication systems have been achieved through previous research efforts that extended their operational range. Innovative adaptations to antenna designs played a pivotal role in these advancements. For instance, adjustments to a patch antenna with a defective backside and semi-circular slots led to a breakthrough, broadening the bandwidth to align with aerospace communication demands [8,9]. Manipulating the antenna’s backside with modified slots yielded unexpected advantages, highlighting the intricate nature of antenna design. Beyond these discoveries, studies have explored alternative alterations to antenna designs, such as using a flexible antenna with a “circular” configuration [10]. Better gain is achieved by incorporating a center cut in the main patch of the antenna [11].
Prior research has improved aircraft communication systems by increasing their functional capacity. Creative antenna design changes enabled these advances. Researchers improved a patch antenna with a defective backside by adding semi-circular slots [12,13]. Researchers carefully altered the antenna’s structure to increase its bandwidth for aircraft communication.
Historical research has advanced wireless communication systems, particularly by increasing their effective range. Modifications to the constructive antenna design have increased the capacity. This was enhanced by adding semi-circular slots to the patch antenna with a defective ground structure [14]. Incorporating an oval shape with two adjacent perpendicular rectangular strip lines facilitates proper impedance matching, which contributes to antenna resonance in lower-order bands [15]. For stable polarized radiation, a centrally fed, U-slot cut has been designed [16]. Innovative planar CPW-fed trapezoidal monopole antennas have been developed to reduce interference in wireless communications systems operating at 3 GHz and 3.5 GHz, featuring single- and dual-band rejection capabilities. [17]. These results demonstrate the complexity of antenna design and the potential benefits of unexpected changes. Based on these critical discoveries, research has focused on several antenna design strategies to enhance performance. An exciting investigation concerns the use of a flexible antenna in combination with a radiator designed in a “dumbbell” shape [18]. This work presents a straightforward design of a penta-band circularly polarized ultra-wideband (PBCP-UWB) antenna on FR4, which exhibits a remarkable fractional axial ratio and impedance-matched bandwidth. The simplicity of the antenna underlines its admirable radiation efficiency, evidenced by consistent results in both measurements and simulations [19]. Addressing the ecological impact of plastic substrates in wearable 5G and 6G devices, our study presents a biocompatible planar inverted-F antenna (PIFA) with a dielectric constant of 5 on a chitosan substrate. It operates in the sub-6 GHz band at 4.5 GHz. The compact antenna (mm2) achieves a specific absorption rate (SAR) of 0.41 W/kg, highlighting the potential of chitosan as an eco-friendly dielectric for plastic-free antennas in Internet of Healthcare Things (IoHT) applications [20]. An interesting investigation related to the use of a flexible antenna in combination with the partial ground plane for ultra-wideband is reported in [21].
An ‘E-I’-shaped microstrip antenna is designed explicitly for proper impedance matching, which aids resonance in high frequencies ranging from 57.9 to 62 GHz [22]. A prototype consisting of a dual-polarized L-shaped probe-fed stacked patch antenna and a 16-element phased array is designed for 60-GHz antenna-in-package (AIP) applications. It tackles fabrication challenges by employing an organic multilayer high-density interconnect process [23]. As described in [24], adopting a T-shaped structure is used to achieve a stable radiation pattern. A square-shaped patch can increase the bandwidth of a 5G antenna [25]. This design modification was developed to increase current distribution within the antenna, ultimately improving performance characteristics. Innovative design modifications reflect the iterative and future-oriented essence of antenna engineering [26].
Resolving the difficulties associated with impedance matching is necessary to transfer power effectively. This can be achieved by including multiple slots in the antenna structure [27]. This approach helps to achieve excellent impedance matching and allows efficient power transfer in antenna systems [28]. The efforts outlined demonstrate a continued dedication to advancing antenna engineering. In this area, continued study and innovation are essential to overcome obstacles and maximize the efficiency of aircraft communication systems.
The implementation of the L-shaped design has been crucial in mitigating band resonance problems and improving the antenna’s effectiveness within a specific frequency range [29]. Research has investigated the shortening of the antenna’s ground plane to increase the range of frequencies it can operate on, thereby modifying the way the signal travels to cover a wider frequency range. Researchers have also focused on modifying the primary patch of the antenna to achieve heightened gain, reshaping the core element to optimize signal concentration and radiation efficiency for overall performance enhancements.
In the context of antenna design for UWB band and 5G and beyond communication systems, a key challenge lies in developing compact antenna structures operating efficiently in the microwave band. This challenge necessitates innovative designs offering improved performance, reduced form factor, and compatibility with the stringent requirements of 5G networks. Our research addresses this challenge by introducing a compact ‘UWB band’ antenna for microwave applications in 5G systems. The subsequent sections of this paper detail the proposed antenna design, its geometry, material selection, design evolution, and parametric study, presenting the results and analysis of the antenna’s performance, concluding with applications in the next section.

2. Geometry and Design Structure

Figure 1 provides a visual representation encapsulating the key stages of the pro-posed antenna’s design and the main elements discussed in this article. The customized antenna under scrutiny boasts dimensions of 12 × 14 × 1.6 mm3 and is constructed on an FR4 substrate. Copper is chosen as the material for the antenna, and annealing is applied to enhance its permittivity and conductivity. The FR4 substrate, with a measured dielectric constant of 4.3, serves as the foundational material for the antenna.
Simulations are carried out using the CST simulator to assess the antenna’s performance. The antenna laboratory uses conventional chemical etching techniques to perform the fabrication process. Subsequent testing and measurements take place in an anechoic chamber with the assistance of a Vector Network Analyzer (VNA).
The development of this compact antenna tailored for the 5G-II band and beyond holds paramount significance for the progression of wireless communication systems. The chosen dimensions, substrate material, and fabrication techniques underscore a meticulous approach to antenna design, while the evaluation through simulations and practical testing emphasizes the commitment to ensuring optimal performance in real-world communication scenarios.
Figure 2 visually represents the antenna design’s geometry and underlying concept. The antenna exhibits a compact yet intricate structure, comprising various front and back elements. On the front side, the design incorporates a circular patch with an interesting twist, namely a circular slot at one of the patch’s corners. Another circular element is positioned within this slot, receiving its central feed via a 50 ohm strip line, contributing to the antenna’s lower bound oscillation. Moving to the back side of the antenna, a distinctive mesh-like structure is observed atop the ground plane. Additionally, four parasitic circular elements are strategically integrated on the underside of the backplane, facilitating the resonance for the higher bound frequencies.
The antenna’s length, height, and width are denoted as ‘C15′ ‘ C18,’ and ‘C17′, respectively. Detailed parameter values for the design are provided in Figure 2. This section offers an in-depth examination of the specifications for the proposed radiator. It outlines the creation of a distinctive configuration incorporating a circular component called ‘C2’. This circular element is securely affixed to the primary microstrip and possesses dimensions represented by ‘C4 × C1’. To further enhance the performance of the lower-order band, a circular slot is introduced, housing a circular parasitic element within it. On the rear side of the radiator, we encounter a mesh-like structure designated as ‘C5 to C12’, which integrates four additional parasitic circular elements with a diameter specified as ‘C14’. These elements contribute to the facilitation of higher-order resonance.
The fabrication process for this proposed antenna design involved using a well-established and highly precise chemical etching technique. Great care was taken in optimizing the fabrication process to ensure utmost precision and repeatability. Subsequently to fabrication, meticulous inspection protocols were meticulously applied to thoroughly scrutinize the antenna for any possible manufacturing defects or irregularities. The aforementioned cutting-edge approach demonstrates a comprehensive and intricate strategy to enhance the antenna’s performance, achieved through meticulous design selections, advanced fabrication methodologies, and rigorous quality control procedures. This methodology stands as a notable advancement within the realm of antenna engineering, pushing the limits of achievable precision, efficiency, and dependability.

3. Design Evolution of the Proposed Antenna

The design evolution of the proposed antenna is visually depicted in Figure 3, illustrating the gradual development of the 5G-II band radiator. This progression is divided into four distinct phases: Step 1 initiates the process by creating a foundational circular patch along with a clearly defined ground plane radiator. In Step 2, the design advances as we introduce a circular slot into the primary patch, including a parasitic rectangular strip on the upper rear side. Step 3 involves the precise etching of a mesh structure onto the rear patch, thereby refining the antenna’s architecture through the addition of parasitic circular elements into the primary patch. Moving to Step 4, the focus is on optimizing the ground plane to attain the desired configuration. In this phase, an extra four circular elements are seamlessly incorporated on the rear side of the radiator, elevating its overall performance and resulting in the final product.
In Figure 4A, we can observe the reflection coefficient of the proposed radiator, which signifies the magnitude of S11. These figures systematically depict the evolution of the antenna design. Beginning with Step 01, the initial configuration comprises a straightforward circular patch positioned above a stable ground plane. This circular element, measuring 9 mm in diameter, is connected through a microstrip line with dimensions of 2 mm × 4 mm. The backplane, with dimensions of 12 × 3 mm2, gives rise to single-band resonances spanning from 23.8 to 36 GHz, as presented in Figure 4A. A comparison of all steps in both the E-plane and H-plane is presented in Figure 4B.
Transitioning to Step 02, a significant transformation occurs both in the front patch and on the rear side of the antenna. This modification entails reshaping the circular patch by introducing a slot in between. Consequently, the antenna’s resonance expands, creating a single-band configuration spanning frequencies from 23.5 to 36 GHz, as evident in Figure 4. As we proceed to Step 03, the emphasis shifts to the rear patch, where elements of the mesh structure are etched out. These enhancements lead to improved impedance matching in the lower-order band and resonances ranging from 19 GHz to 36 GHz. In the Final Step (Step 04), a substantial modification is made to the front patch of the antenna. Four parasitic circular-shaped elements are etched out from the lower ground plane, resulting in an extended frequency range for the antenna, covering from 16.3 to 34 GHz, as depicted in Figure 4.

4. Parameter Study

We carefully looked at different aspects of our design during the parameter study. One critical aspect we focused on was the size of the circular patch referred to as ‘C2’. We conducted tests with different sizes, ranging from 8 to 10 mm, to determine the most suitable size for our antenna. After a comprehensive testing process, we concluded that a 3 mm diameter was the optimal choice. This specific size provided the necessary impedance matching for our antenna. The effectiveness of this choice can be observed in Figure 5, which displays the trends in impedance matching.
Another parameter we investigated was the diameter of the parasitic circular element on the front side, referred to as ‘C3’. We examined various sizes, ranging from 3 to 5 mm, and determined that a diameter of 4 mm worked best. This size allowed for the excitation of both lower and higher-order resonances while maintaining the magnitude of S11, a measure of antenna performance, below −10 dB across a wide range of frequencies, spanning from 16.3 to 34 GHz. The influence of this adjustment is evident in Figure 6.
Furthermore, we delved into the diameter of the circular shape on the backplane, known as ‘C14’. We carried out tests with different heights, ranging from 0.5 to 1.5 mm, to identify the most effective configuration. After thorough testing, we determined that a height of 1 mm proved to be the most advantageous, particularly for impedance matching, especially at lower frequencies around 18 GHz. The results of these investigations are presented in Figure 7. We will provide a more detailed discussion of these findings in the upcoming section. These parameter adjustments were essential in fine-tuning the antenna design for optimal performance.

5. Measurement and Simulated Results

Comprehensive measurements were conducted in an anechoic chamber to evaluate the performance of the proposed fabricated antenna. The anechoic chamber provides an isolated and controlled testing environment, minimizing external reflections and interference. A Vector Network Analyzer (VNA) was employed to measure key parameters, such as return loss, radiation patterns, and impedance characteristics. Throughout the measuring process, the antenna was accurately positioned and aligned according to the experimental setup. Multiple measurements were conducted by positioning the antenna at various angles and orientations to record its radiation patterns and assess its directional properties.
Figure 8 displays a comparison between actual measurements and simulated data from CST for our suggested antenna design. It examines the gain and radiation efficiency of the antenna across several frequencies. This comparison elucidates the performance of our antenna in real-world scenarios. An important finding from the graph is that the design achieves its peak gain, about 3.85 decibels, at the frequency where it also demonstrates its best radiation efficiency, reaching an impressive 82.9%. This correlation indicates that at this specific frequency, our antenna is producing the highest signal amplification and effectively converting a significant portion of input power into radiated energy. However, as we move to higher frequencies, an interesting trend emerges. The antenna’s electrical size decreases, resulting in an increase in ohmic losses. This, in turn, leads to a decrease in radiation efficiency at higher frequencies. This phenomenon is driven by the fact that the antenna becomes smaller relative to the wavelength at higher frequencies, causing more energy to be lost as heat due to electrical resistance. Furthermore, at these higher frequencies where the antenna’s size approaches the wavelength, we observe even higher losses due to the excitation of higher-order resonating modes. Despite these challenges, our presented antenna structure demonstrates an impressive capability to generate and reflect radiation effectively within the frequency range of 16.2 to 34 GHz. Significantly, the comparison between the measured data and the CST simulations indicates a close similarity in the plots for gain and radiation efficiency, further validating our design’s accuracy and ability to perform consistently in practical applications.
The proposed structure has undergone a comprehensive analysis to optimize its impact on the S11 parameter and other simulated outcomes. The measurement results were compared with theoretical simulations to validate the antenna’s design and verify its performance, as illustrated in Figure 9. Deviations or discrepancies between the measurements and simulations were carefully analyzed to identify potential factors influencing the antenna’s behavior. The proposed radiator demonstrates a wide impedance bandwidth, indicating its ability to operate effectively across a range of frequencies. The bandwidth is calculated as 70.4%, covering the frequency range from 16.2 GHz to 34 GHz. This broad impedance bandwidth is crucial for accommodating multiple communication bands and ensuring efficient signal transmission. A comparison between the simulated and measured return loss validates the accuracy of the simulation model, with close agreement observed. Minor discrepancies can be attributed to fabrication tolerances and measurement uncertainties. Nonetheless, the antenna demonstrates excellent impedance matching and performs admirably within the desired frequency band.
Figure 10 shows a curve representation of our proposed structure’s simulated input impedance variation. This impedance includes both the real and imaginary components, providing insights into how our design interacts with different frequencies. The curve displayed in the graph illustrates that the real component of impedance, which has been normalized to a reference value of 50 ohms, undergoes changes across the entire frequency spectrum, which spans from 16.2 to 34 GHz. Specifically, this real component ranges from 31 ohms to 69 ohms. The nature of our design’s behavior is primarily inductive within a specific frequency range, as evidenced by the positive polarity of the imaginary part of the curve between 18 and 20 GHz. Beyond this frequency range, its behavior transforms into a capacitive one, characterized by a negative polarity from 20 GHz to 30 GHz. Subsequently, the design reverts to an inductive behavior again, demonstrating characteristics that resemble both a capacitor and an inductor at higher frequencies. These impedance variations at different frequencies are crucial for understanding and optimizing the performance of our proposed structure.
Figure 11 is an illuminating visual representation, effectively showcasing the Co (co-polarization) and Cross-polarization patterns across distinct frequencies, specifically 22 and 32 GHz. This depiction of the radiation pattern unfolds within the context of two orthogonal planes, affording a comprehensive insight into the antenna’s behavior. More precisely, the ‘E’ Plane occupies a position of 90° within the YoZ plane, while the ‘H’ Plane assumes a placement of 0° within the XoZ plane. The radiation patterns exhibit a prominent feature of being remarkably stable and consistent. The antenna’s remarkable efficiency is evident in this quality. The visualization of radiation patterns in orthogonal planes allows clear knowledge of the antenna’s directional characteristics at the selected frequencies to be obtained. The addition of both measured and simulated radiation patterns for the horizontal (H) and electric (E) planes in the illustration enhances the understanding of the topic. The consistent quality of the radiation pattern across these planes is particularly significant. The consistent behavior of the antenna acts as a strong indicator of its well-behaved and harmonious performance. The consistent and unchanging character of the antenna highlights its potential to maintain a reliable and effective performance in terms of both transmitting signals and determining direction. The intricate details of these radiation patterns are explicitly represented in Figure 12, which provides a visualization of the antenna’s radiation patterns at the (a) 22 GHz H-plane and (b) 22 GHz E-plane.
The radiation lobe of an antenna is a crucial component that significantly influences its overall performance and operational capabilities. It plays a crucial role in explaining several elements of the antenna, such as its coverage, directionality, and emission patterns. The objective of this article is to offer an in-depth examination of the antenna’s radiation lobe, with the aim of assessing its suitability for specific use cases. In Figure 12, we are presented with graphical representations of the antenna’s radiation patterns, known as the ‘front and rear phase lobe,’ specifically at a frequency of 22 GHz. These patterns essentially serve as a visual representation of how the antenna disperses and focuses its radiated power in distinct directions. Examining these graphs provides us with useful information about the antenna’s radiation properties when operating at the specified frequencies.
We utilized sophisticated electromagnetic simulation techniques to visually represent the surface currents of the antenna.
Figure 13 shows the antenna’s simulated surface current distribution. Color contours show current intensity, with different colors indicating current magnitude. This visualization helps identify high-current density zones and observe how currents interact with antenna sections. Analyzing front and back surface currents on the recommended antenna at 22 GHz and 32 GHz frequencies. Understanding surface current dispersion and scale helps optimize antenna configuration and uncover issues that may affect efficiency.
Figure 14 shows the Voltage Standing Wave Ratio (VSWR) used to test the antenna. The ratio of a transmission line’s highest to lowest voltage is VSWR, an important antenna engineering metric. A decrease in VSWR indicates better impedance matching, leading to higher antenna efficiency. The graph in Figure 14 illustrates the VSWR characteristics of the analyzed antenna, providing information on its power transfer efficiency to the transmission line and the presence of reflections. A well-designed antenna typically exhibits a consistently low VSWR across its operational frequency range.
The results presented in Figure 14 validate the antenna’s design and shed light on its impedance-matching capabilities. This analysis contributes to a comprehensive understanding of the antenna’s behavior, ensuring its suitability for practical communication applications. The VSWR assessment is a fundamental step in confirming the antenna’s effectiveness, aligning with industry standards and critical to evaluating overall antenna performance.
Table 1 demonstrates a contrast between antennas that have been previously documented. After evaluating multiple parameters, it has been established through our analysis that the design we propose is smaller in dimension and displays enhanced characteristics compared to the antennas previously documented.

6. Conclusions

The proposed article introduces a miniaturized antenna for millimeter-wave 5G-II band communication. This article thoroughly analyzed all the measured data, comparing the results with the antenna’s original design specifications and relevant standards. The radiator, with dimensions of 12 × 14 × 1.6 mm3, exhibits impressive performance characteristics. It boasts a remarkable efficiency of 82.9% and achieves a gain of 3.85 dBi. The antenna demonstrates an impressive impedance bandwidth of 70.4% centered at 25 GHz, covering a wide frequency range from 16.2 to 34 GHz. The E/H-field current distribution also shows a strong and well-defined radiation signal, with a stable radiation pattern. The surface currents exhibit significant signal strength. This antenna proves highly adaptable, and suitable for a variety of applications, including Ka band, Ku band, 5G-II bands, and other microwave and millimeter-wave communication purposes. In terms of future development, a miniaturized antenna designed for millimeter-wave 5G-II band communications provides a platform for potential advancements. Ongoing research may focus on refining the design of the antenna to meet specific frequency bands within Ku, and the investigation of advanced materials or metamaterial structures may contribute to further miniaturization or improved performance metrics.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.V.Y., C.K.R., S.V.Y., T.A. and J.A.; methodology, M.V.Y., C.K.R., S.V.Y., T.A. and J.A.; software, M.V.Y., C.K.R. and S.V.Y.; validation, M.V.Y., C.K.R. and S.V.Y.; formal analysis, M.V.Y., C.K.R., S.V.Y., T.A. and J.A.; investigation, M.V.Y., C.K.R., S.V.Y., T.A. and J.A.; resources, M.V.Y., C.K.R., S.V.Y., T.A. and J.A.; data curation, M.V.Y., C.K.R. and S.V.Y.; writing—M.V.Y., C.K.R. and S.V.Y.; writing—review and editing, M.V.Y., C.K.R., S.V.Y., T.A. and J.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were generated during the study. All the data are contained within the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the use of Grammarly and Quill Bot in correcting the English and grammatical errors in the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. J.A. is an employee of Ignion, which does conduct commercial research in antenna technology. The authors did not receive any fund support from Ignion, and did not have any financial interests.

References

  1. Mishra, B.; Verma, R.K.; Yashwanth, N.; Singh, R.K. A review on microstrip patch antenna parameters of different geometry and bandwidth enhancement techniques. Int. J. Microw. Wirel. Technol. 2021, 14, 652–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Przesmycki, R.; Bugaj, M.; Nowosielski, L. Broadband microstrip antenna for 5G wireless systems operating at 28 GHz. Electronics 2020, 10, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Imran, D.; Farooqi, M.M.; Khattak, M.I.; Ullah, Z.; Khan, M.I.; Khattak, M.A.; Dar, H. Millimeter wave microstrip patch antenna for 5G mobile communication. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Engineering and Emerging Technologies (ICEET), Lahore, Pakistan, 22–23 February 2018; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  4. Khidre, A.; Lee, K.-F.; Elsherbeni, A.Z.; Yang, F. Wide band dual-beam U-slot microstrip antenna. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2013, 61, 1415–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kiran, T.; Mounisha, N.; Mythily, C.; Akhil, D.; Kumar, T.P. Design of microstrip patch antenna for 5G applications. IOSR J. Electron. Commun. Eng. 2018, 13, 14–17. [Google Scholar]
  6. Colaco, J.; Lohani, R. Design and Implementation of Microstrip Patch Antenna for 5G applications. In Proceedings of the 2020 5th International Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems (ICCES), Coimbatore, India, 10–12 June 2020; pp. 682–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shagar, A.; Wahidabanu, S. Novel wideband slot antenna having notch-band function for 2.4 GHz WLAN and UWB applications. Int. J. Microw. Wirel. Technol. 2011, 3, 451–458. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kapoor, K. U-Shaped Microstrip Patch Antenna with Partial Ground Plane for Mobile Satellite Services (MSS). In Proceedings of the 2019 URSI Asia-Pacific Radio Science Conference (AP-RASC), New Delhi, India, 9–15 March 2019; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kurniawan, A.; Mukhlishin, S. Wideband antenna design and fabrication for modern wireless communications systems. Procedia Technol. 2013, 11, 348–353. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ghosh, A.; Ghosh, S.K.; Ghosh, D.; Chattopadhyay, S. Improved polarization purity for circular microstrip antenna with defected patch surface. Int. J. Microw. Wirel. Technol. 2016, 8, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Verma, S.; Mahajan, L.; Kumar, R.; Saini, H.S.; Kumar, N. A small microstrip patch antenna for future 5G applications. In Proceedings of the 2016 5th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO), Noida, India, 7–9 September 2016; pp. 460–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Abdelraheem, A.M.; Abdalla, M.A. Compact curved half circular disc-monopole UWB antenna. Int. J. Microw. Wirel. Technol. 2016, 8, 283–290. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gupta, S. Parasitic rectangular patch antenna with variable shape ground plane for satellite and defence communication. In Proceedings of the 2019 URSI Asia-Pacific Radio Science Conference (AP-RASC), New Delhi, India, 9–15 March 2019; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  14. Awad, N.M.; Abdelazeez, M.K. Multislot microstrip antenna for ultra-wide band applications. J. King Saud Univ.-Eng. Sci. 2018, 30, 38–45. [Google Scholar]
  15. An, W.; Li, Y.; Fu, H.; Ma, J.; Chen, W.; Feng, B. Low-Profile and Wideband Microstrip Antenna With Stable Gain for 5G Wireless Applications. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2018, 17, 621–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rashmitha, R.; Niran, N.; Jugale, A.A.; Ahmed, M.R. Microstrip patch antenna design for fixed mobile and satellite 5G communications. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2000, 171, 2073–2079. [Google Scholar]
  17. Tampouratzis, M.G.; Katsos, E.; Vouyioukas, D.; Stratakis, D.; Yioultsis, T. Design of Planar CPW-Fed UWB Trapezoidal Monopole Antennas with Band Rejection Characteristics. In Proceedings of the 2022 26th International Conference on Circuits, Systems, Communications and Computers (CSCC), Crete, Greece, 19–22 July 2022; pp. 250–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hota, S.; Yadav, M.V.; Baudha, S.; Mangaraj, B.B. Miniaturized planar ultra-wideband patch antenna with semi-circular slot partial ground plane. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Indian Conference on Antennas and Propogation (InCAP), Ahmedabad, India, 19–22 December 2019; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sakshi; Bharti, M. Penta-band Planar Monopole Circular Antenna Design Using Inverted L-Shaped Slot for UWB Application. J. Electron. Mater. 2023, 52, 8281–8292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Marasco, I.; Niro, G.; de Marzo, G.; Rizzi, F.; D’Orazio, A.; Grande, M.; De Vittorio, M. Design and Fabrication of a Plastic-Free Antenna on a Sustainable Chitosan Substrate. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2022, 44, 341–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lakshmanan, R.; Sukumaran, S.K. Flexible ultra wide band antenna for WBAN applications. Procedia Technol. 2016, 24, 880–887. [Google Scholar]
  22. Saini, J.; Agarwal, S.K. Design a single band microstrip patch antenna at 60 GHz millimeter wave for 5G application. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Computer, Communications and Electronics (Comptelix), Jaipur, India, 1–2 July 2017; pp. 227–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xia, H.; Liu, Z.; Liu, H.; Zhang, T.; Wang, F.; Hu, X.; Wu, X.; Li, L.; Wang, Z. A Cost-effective Wideband Dual-Polarized L-shaped Probe-fed Phased Array Antenna for 60 GHz AiP Applications. IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Manuf. Technol. 2023, 13, 1790–1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Abdulbari, A.A.; Jawad, M.M.; Hanoosh, H.O.; Saare, M.A.; Lashari, S.A.; Sari, S.A.; Ahmad, S.; Khalill, Y.; Hussain, Y.M. Design compact microstrap patch antenna with T-shaped 5G application. Bull. Electr. Eng. Inform. 2021, 10, 2072–2078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jandi, Y.; Gharnati, F.; Said, A.O. Design of a compact dual bands patch antenna for 5G applications. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Wireless Technologies, Embedded and Intelligent Systems (WITS), Fez, Morocco, 19–20 April 2017; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  26. Mazinani, S.M.; Hassani, H.R. A novel broadband plate-loaded planar monopole antenna. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2009, 8, 1123–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Thukral, S. A Compact Hammer Shaped Printed Antenna with Parasitic Elements for Defense and Mobile Satellite Applications. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Indian Conference on Antennas and Propagation (InCAP), Jaipur, India, 13–16 December 2021; pp. 521–524. [Google Scholar]
  28. Bansal, Y. A compact slot antenna for ultra-wideband applications. Telecommun. Radio Eng. 2020, 79, 213–222. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kim, G.H.; Yun, T.Y. Compact ultrawideband monopole antenna with an inverted-L-shaped coupled strip. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2013, 12, 1291–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Graphical abstract for proposed approach. (A) Simulated antenna using CST. (B) The fabrication unit available in the Antenna Lab. (C) Fabricated antenna design and testing and measurement. (D) Comparison of simulated and measured results.
Figure 1. Graphical abstract for proposed approach. (A) Simulated antenna using CST. (B) The fabrication unit available in the Antenna Lab. (C) Fabricated antenna design and testing and measurement. (D) Comparison of simulated and measured results.
Technologies 12 00010 g001
Figure 2. Geometry and conceptual design of an antenna.
Figure 2. Geometry and conceptual design of an antenna.
Technologies 12 00010 g002
Figure 3. Evolution of the antenna.
Figure 3. Evolution of the antenna.
Technologies 12 00010 g003
Figure 4. (A) All stages of S11 parameter. (B) All stages of radiation performance.
Figure 4. (A) All stages of S11 parameter. (B) All stages of radiation performance.
Technologies 12 00010 g004
Figure 5. Simulated parameter Sweep ‘C2′.
Figure 5. Simulated parameter Sweep ‘C2′.
Technologies 12 00010 g005
Figure 6. Simulated parameter Sweep ‘C3′.
Figure 6. Simulated parameter Sweep ‘C3′.
Technologies 12 00010 g006
Figure 7. Simulated parameter Sweep ‘C14′.
Figure 7. Simulated parameter Sweep ‘C14′.
Technologies 12 00010 g007
Figure 8. Simulated and measured gain and efficiency curve.
Figure 8. Simulated and measured gain and efficiency curve.
Technologies 12 00010 g008
Figure 9. Magnitude (in dB) V/S frequency curve.
Figure 9. Magnitude (in dB) V/S frequency curve.
Technologies 12 00010 g009
Figure 10. I/P impedance curve.
Figure 10. I/P impedance curve.
Technologies 12 00010 g010
Figure 11. Simulated and measured Co and Cross-polarization radiation patterns. (A) H-plane pattern at 22 GHz and (B) E-plane pattern at 22 GHz.
Figure 11. Simulated and measured Co and Cross-polarization radiation patterns. (A) H-plane pattern at 22 GHz and (B) E-plane pattern at 22 GHz.
Technologies 12 00010 g011
Figure 12. Simulated 3D radiation pattern representation of the antenna.
Figure 12. Simulated 3D radiation pattern representation of the antenna.
Technologies 12 00010 g012
Figure 13. Surface current distribution of the antenna at (A) 22 GHz and (B) 32 GHz.
Figure 13. Surface current distribution of the antenna at (A) 22 GHz and (B) 32 GHz.
Technologies 12 00010 g013
Figure 14. The VSWR curve of the proposed antenna.
Figure 14. The VSWR curve of the proposed antenna.
Technologies 12 00010 g014
Table 1. Comparison of published planar antennas.
Table 1. Comparison of published planar antennas.
Band Obtained (GHz)Peak Gain (dBi)Fractional B/W (%)Peak η (%) Overall Volume (in λ)
[2]26–323.619.89%NA0.05 λ × 0.07 λ × 0.013 λ
[3]38–544.934%78%0.076 λ × 0.083 λ × 0.019 λ
[4]3.1–115.1110%89%0.20 λ × 0.25 λ × 0.015 λ
[5]28–502.656%80%0.10 λ × 0.078 λ × 0.015 λ
[6]25.3–26.83.56<1%NA0.05 λ × 0.05 λ × 0.012 λ
[7]2–94.5127%62%0.33 λ × 0.22 λ × 00.1 λ
[10]3.5–193.2145%81%0.23 λ × 0.23 λ × 0.015 λ
[11]9.5–10.364.4<1%NA0.06 λ × 0.06 λ × 0.004 λ
[12]2.9–165.2139%87%0.33 λ × 0.24 λ × 0.014 λ
[13]2.8–122.79122%72%0.18 λ × 0.14 λ × 0.15 λ
[14]2.7–7.32.3108%78.3%0.32 λ × 0.2 λ × 0.014 λ
[15]2.84–5.17558%NA0.84 λ × 0.68 λ × 0.06 λ
[16]42.48–45.24.387%NA0.10 λ × 0.12 λ × 0.02 λ
[22]57.9–625.4868%NA0.15 λ × 0.15 λ × 0.02 λ
[24]2.9–4.482.5242.8%NA0.02 λ × 0.023 λ × 0.001 λ
Presented16.2–343.8570.4%82.9%0.06 λ × 0.07 λ × 0.0086 λ
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yadav, M.V.; Kumar R, C.; Yadav, S.V.; Ali, T.; Anguera, J. A Miniaturized Antenna for Millimeter-Wave 5G-II Band Communication. Technologies 2024, 12, 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies12010010

AMA Style

Yadav MV, Kumar R C, Yadav SV, Ali T, Anguera J. A Miniaturized Antenna for Millimeter-Wave 5G-II Band Communication. Technologies. 2024; 12(1):10. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies12010010

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yadav, Manish Varun, Chandru Kumar R, Swati Varun Yadav, Tanweer Ali, and Jaume Anguera. 2024. "A Miniaturized Antenna for Millimeter-Wave 5G-II Band Communication" Technologies 12, no. 1: 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies12010010

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop