Previous Article in Journal
Municipal Bond Pricing: A Data Driven Method
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Int. J. Financial Stud. 2018, 6(3), 81; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs6030081

The Value Effect of Financial Reform on U.K. Banks and Insurance Companies

1
Independent Researcher, University of Westminster, London W1W 7BY, UK
2
Independent Researcher, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 9 July 2018 / Revised: 9 August 2018 / Accepted: 29 August 2018 / Published: 11 September 2018
Full-Text   |   PDF [3389 KB, uploaded 12 September 2018]   |  

Abstract

In response to the financial crisis, a number of reforms to bank regulation have been introduced. Many of these reforms seek to improve the resilience of banks through making changes to their structure. In the U.K., the Banking Reform Act 2013 was enacted. This study attempts to examine the market’s reaction to this important financial reform, on the stock price of banks and insurance companies and contributes to the current regulatory debate. As reform proposals take time to get converted into Law, this paper focuses on three legislative events extracted from the Parliament website; the third reading at the House of Commons, the third reading at the House of Lords, and the Royal Assent, effectively the stages from which reform proposals convert to Law. This study employs an event study methodology, based on a sample consisting of 24 major banks and insurance companies listed on the London Stock Exchange (LSE) for which data are available from 30/11/2012 to 18/12/2013 covering all three events. The findings are that banks’ shares reacted positively, whereas insurance companies’ shares reacted negatively to the passage of the Banking Reform Act 2013 in the House of Commons (first event); insurance companies experienced negative returns, whereas banks’ returns did not react significantly in relation to the passage of the Act in the House of Lords (second event); and finally, banks’ shares reacted positively while insurance companies’ shares reacted negatively when the Act received the Royal Assent (third event). One of the main intentions of the Banking Reform Act 2013, was to contain the risk taken by banks. Market reaction on banks’ shares shows that the market accepted this; on the other hand, the negative effect on the shares of insurance companies would imply that insurance companies are perceived to have taken on some additional risk as a consequence of the Act. View Full-Text
Keywords: financial institution; financial market; financial service financial institution; financial market; financial service
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Parise, T.V.; Shenai, V. The Value Effect of Financial Reform on U.K. Banks and Insurance Companies. Int. J. Financial Stud. 2018, 6, 81.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Int. J. Financial Stud. EISSN 2227-7072 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top